Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Ruruurursadwad
Ruruurursadwad
Pasadilla, 2005). Since then, the nation opens its doors to global free trade,
with high hopes that this agreement would bring developments within the
nation’s poor economy and also to have a role within the global economy and
trade (Villa, 2016). However, the Philippines has failed to create an organized
socioeconomic environment that would have prepared the country for global
competition. On the bright side, Philippine free trade agreement brought drastic
changes in Philippine society. Vast developments in technology were introduced
in the Philippine market by foreign investments. Multilateral agreements
between nations also allowed Filipino workers to travel and work abroad.
Economic engagement of the Philippines with the rest of the world has made a
significant role in the economic revival of the country.
In this modern debate on how to enrich a country with certain economic
policies, free trade has undoubtedly won the argument. And despite of the
consequences it may bring, free trade policy can make the Philippines into an
economically-progressive nation, if the political leaders can utilize its benefits to
help local workers and businesses to improve their capabilities to enter the
competition of global free market.
References:
Internet Articles
News Articles
Oplas, B., Jr. (2016, December 15). Free trade means more investments and
increased mobility. Business World Online. Retrieved from
https://www.bworldonline.com/content.php?section=Opinion&title=free-trade-
means-more-investments-and-increased-mobility&id=137815
Journals
Banlaoi, R. (2004). Globalization and nation-building in the Philippines: State
predicaments in managing society in the midst of diversity. Growth and
governance in Asia, 203-214.
Pasadilla, G., & Liao, C. (2005). Who are opposed to free trade in the
Philippines. Philippine Journal of Development, 32(1), 1-17.