Professional Documents
Culture Documents
GS ORGDEV Kaizen Handouts 010410 Asia
GS ORGDEV Kaizen Handouts 010410 Asia
GS ORGDEV Kaizen Handouts 010410 Asia
Tomas
Graduate School
España, Manila
Organizational Development
Friday 6:00pm – 9:00pm
Submitted by:
Submitted to:
A. Kaizen
The word itself as per Imai (1986) “implies improvement that involves
everyone – both managers and workers – and entails a relatively little
expense”. According to him, Kaizen applies to all aspects of life, not just to
the workplace.
The driving force behind kaizen is dissatisfaction with the status quo, no
matter how good the firm is perceived to be. Standing still will allow the
competition to overtake and pass any complacent firm. The act of being
creative to solve a problem or make an improvement not only educates
people but also inspires to go further.
1. maintenance
2. improvement
The first step in the Kaizen Process establishes the PDCA cycle.
The PDCA cycle revolves continuously. It’s the reason why management
should initiate this by establishing continuously challenging goals.
However, before working on PDCA, any current process must be
stabilized. This is also referred as improvement
The SDCA cycle, on the other hand, standardizes and stabilizes the
current process and also refers to maintenance.
IMPROVEMENT – PDCA
Act Plan
A P
C D
Check Do
MAINTENANCE – SDCA
Standardi
Act
ze
A S
C D
Check Do
• Of quality, cost and delivery, which should have the highest priority?
• This concept requires management commitment.
• Managers often face the temptation to make compromises in
meeting delivery requirements or cutting costs.
TQM
Quality Assurance
Quality Control
Inspection
4. Policy Deployment
If everybody is engaged with Kaizen for Kaizen’s sake without any aim, its
impact may be limited. Management should ensure that clear cut targets
are established to guide everyone. Top Management must device a long
term strategy broken down into medium term and annual strategies.
GEMBA
GEMBA
• Sitting at the top or sitting at the bottom are equally valid in terms
of gemba management.
• Gemba by providing the product and services that satisfy the
customer and management by setting strategy and deploying policy
to achieve the goal in gemba.
• Thus the thrust for improvement should be both bottom-up and top-
down.
• Top-down initiates establishing policies, targets and priorities.
• This process of achieving corporate objectives is called policy
deployment
• Many managers tend to believe that their job is to always tell gemba
what to do.
• Looking at the bottom-top, managers must see that they should
listen to and learn from employees in gemba in order to provide
appropriate help.
• Gemba becomes the source for achieving commonsense, low cost
improvements.
• The respective roles of management in this two models should not
be confused.
C. Five Golden Rules of Gemba
This is the first, and most important rule. Many managers learn
about the problems that happened in gemba from a report that
reaches them several days or weeks after. The best solution is to go
to gemba at once when you hear that a problem has happened.
2. Check with gembutsu (machines, tools, rejects, and
customer complaints.)
By repeating the question “why” several times, you can find out the
root cause of the problem.
A. Housekeeping
Refers to the practice of going through all the tools, materials, etc., in
the work area and keeping only essential items. Everything else is
stored or discarded. This leads to fewer hazards and less clutter to
interfere with productive work.
B. Muda Elimination
In Japanese, the word muda means waste. Any activity that does not
add value is muda. People in gemba either add value or do not add
value. This is also true for other resources, such as machines and
materials. Muda elimination can be the most cost-effective way to
improve productivity and reduce operating costs. Kaizen emphasizes
the elimination of muda in gemba rather than the increasing of
investment.
Types of Muda
1. Muda
Any activity that consumes resources without creating value for the
customer. Within this general category it is useful to distinguish between
type one muda, consisting of activities that cannot be eliminated
immediately, and type two muda, consisting of activities that can be
eliminated quickly through kaizen.
2. Mura
3. Muri
C. Standardization
How often do you walk into an office and there is clutter everywhere. It is
not at all clear where today's work is. Make the work visible, organized
and easy to see! Avoid hiding the work in different locations.
Andons
An andon is a device to indicate that the process has stopped for some
reason. This can be as simple as a colored block that you place on top of
your workstation or a flashing light that is connected to a central support
resource.
Signage
Professional signage can be a great way to create visual control.
Color Coding
Creating a color code that everyone understands can have great visual
impact.
Floor Marking
Indicate what should go where.
Visual procedures
Use flow charts, text and pictures to describe the process right beside
where the action takes place.
Shadow Boards
By creating a shadow around an item then it is easy to see where the item
should be returned.
I have been working with an engineering company for the past two (2)
years already. In this period, I have come to realize that our organization
is now ready to accept an organizational intervention which is Kaizen. My
proposal has been accepted by our General Manager (who is also the
owner of the company) and we’re about to implement it by April.
We don’t have a kaizen event at the moment since we’re still kicking off
the program. However, with the input that the study has given us, we
would probably know when to have a kaizen event. It may not solve any
problem within our organization, but it can possibly bring breakthrough
improvements in our objective to have a lean company.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Burton, T., & Boeder, S. (2003). The Lean Extended Enterprise. Boca
Raton, Florida. J. Ross Publishing Inc.
Farris, A., et. al. (2008). Critical success factors for human resource
outcomes in Kaizen events: An empirical study. Int. J. Production
Economics. USA.
Leanenterprises. (2008 July 6). Lean Enterprise Case Study DELL Example
[Video File]. Retrieved from http://www.youtube.com/watch?
v=cdg9rpg6Dt8