Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Overview of Artificial Lift Systems
Overview of Artificial Lift Systems
Summary
This paper gives guidelines to assist in the selection of One serious limitation to artificial lift installations has
artificial lift methods. The most important guideline is been the installation of small casing sizes, which limits
determination of the flow rates possible by each method. the installation to specific tubing sizes to obtain the ob-
This requires preparation of pressure/flow rate diagrams
jective flow rate and, in particular, limits the size of
combining well-inflow performance relationships with
retrievable gas lift equipment and/or pumping equip-
tubing intake curves. The tubing intake curve includes
ment. The installation of gas-lift mandrels that accept
pressure loss in the complete piping system and/or
only I-in. (2.5-cm) OD gas-lift valves is common in the
pressure gains by the pumping method. Many other fac-
U.S. , and serious limitations on gas passage volumes
tors other than rate, such as location, retrievability by
are imposed on the system with this small valve. Also,
wireline, corrosion, paraffin, scale deposition, cost,
the better performance characteristics of the 1 /z -in.
operating life, and others, influence the final selection of
(3.81-cm) OD valve are lost. For the pumping systems,
lift equipment.
the smaller capacity pumps must be used in the smaller
Introduction casing sizes, and sometimes the advantage of
This paper provides an overview of artificial lift systems retrievable pumps is lost.
and gives guidelines indicating when one system is better Surface-space limitations become an important factor.
to use than another. Advantages and disadvantages are For example, if large compressors for gas lift or large
given with examples in the selection of lifl methods. generators for electrical pumping are anticipated for off-
This list represents the relative standing of lift systems shore platforms, provisions must be made in the original
based on the number of installations throughout the design to allow for both weight and space on the plat-
world: (1) sucker rod pumping (beam pumping), (2) gas forms. Some engineers are invariably optimistic about
lift, (3) electric submersible pumping, (4) hydraulic natural flow in the planning stage, and in many instances
piston pumping, (5) hydraulic jet pumping, (6) plunger they still maintain that artificial lift will not be required
(free-piston) lift, and (7) other methods. This differs ac- during the life of a field. This leads to very poor plan-
cording to field, state, and country. ning, especially on offshore facilities.
New lift systems are being developed and tested con- In the design of artificial lift systems for a well, it is
tinually. The lifting of heavy viscous crude oils requires recommended that it initially be treated as if it were a
special attention, and methods designed specifically for flowing well—i.e. , a production systems graph should
this purpose are being tested. Wells located offshore and be prepared to see if the well is capable of flowing and, if
in deep water present specific problems, and surface- it is, at what rate. The artificial lift analysis can be placed
space limitations become important. The artificial lift on the same plot. Numerous flowing wells will show in-
method should be considered before the well is drilled. creased flow rates when placed on artificial lift.
Obviously this cannot be done on wildcat wells, but it The purpose of any artificial lift system is to create a
must be done on all subsequent development wells. The predetermined tubing intake pressure such that the reser-
drilling program must be set out to ensure hole sizes that voir may respond and produce the objective flow rate.
permit adequate casing and tubing sizes. The design and analysis of any lifting system can be
divided into two main components. The first is the reser-
Ot 49—2136/82/0010-9979$00.25 voir component (inflow performance relationship),
Copyright 1982 Society of Petroleum Engineers of AIME
which represents the well’s ability to produce fluids. The
2384 JOURNAL OF PETROLEUM
TECHNOLOGY
TABLE 1—RELATIVE ADVANTAGES OF ARTIFICIAL LIFT SYSTEMS”
Hydraulic
Electric Submersible Hydraulic
Rod Pumping Piston Pumping Pumping Gas Lift Jet Pump Plunger Lift
Relatively simple Not so depth limited— Can lift extremely Can handle large Retrievable without Retrievable without
system design. can lift large volumes high volumes, volume of solids with pulling tubing. pulling tubing.
from great depths, 20,000 B/D minor problems.
Units easily 500 B/D (79.49 m ^/d), (19 078 m"/d), in Has no moving parts. Very inexpensive
changed to other from 15,000 ft shallow wells with Handles large volume installation.
wells with minimum (4572 m). Have been large casing. Currently in high-PI wells No problems in
cost. lifting -L 120,000 B/D (continuous lift), deviated or crooked Automatically keeps
installed to 18,000 ft
(5486.4 m). (19 068 m*/d) from 50,000 B/D holes. tubing clean of
Efficient, simple water supply wells in (7949.37 m*/d). paraffin, scale.
and easy for field Crooked holes Middle East with Unobtrusive in urban
people to operate. 600-hp (448-kW) Fairly flexible— locations. Applicable for high
present
minimal problems. units; 720-hp (537- convertible from gas oil ratio wells.
Applicable to slim kW) continuous to Applicable otlshore.
holes and multiple available, 1,000-hp intermittent to Can be used in
Unobtrusive in urban
completions. (746-kW) under chamber or plunger Can use water as a
locations. conjunction with
development.
Can pump a well down Power source can be lift as well power source. intermittent gas lift.
lo very low pressure remotely located. Unobtrusive in urban declines.
(depth and rate locations. Power fluid does not Can be used to unload
dependent). Analyzable. Unobtrusive in urban have to be so clean liquid from gas wells.
Simple to operate. locations. as for hydraulic
System usually is Flexible—can usually piston pumping.
naturally vented for match displacement Easy to install Power source can be
gas separation and to well’s capability downhole pressure remotely located. Corrosion scale
fluid level soundings. as well declines. sensor for telemetering emulsion treatment
pressure to surface via Easy to obtain easy Io perform.
Flexible—can match Can use gas or cable. downhole pressures
displacement rate to electricity as and gradients. Power source can be
well capability as well power source. Crooked holes present remotely located and
declines. no problem. Lifting gassy wells can handle high
Downhole pumps is no problem. volumes to 30,000 B/D
Analyzable. can be circulated Applicable offshore. (4769.62 m*/d).
out in free systems. Sometimes serviceable
Can lift high- Corrosion and scale with wireline unit.
temperature and Can pump a well treatment easy to
viscous oils. down to fairly low perform. Crooked holes present
pressure. no problem.
Can use gas or Availability in
electricity as power Applicable to different size. Corrosion is not
source. multiple completions. usually as adverse.
Lifting cost for high
Corrosion and.scale Applicable oflshore. volumes generally Applicable offshore.
treatments easy to very low.
perform. Closed system will
combat corrosion.
Applicable to pump
oP control if Easy to pump in
electrified. cycles by time clock.
‘Reprinted with permission from S. Gibbs, Nabla Corp., Midland, T8, with modifications by It. nrown. ’
* Reprinted with permission from S. Gibbs, Nabla Corp., Midland, TX, with modifications by K. Brown. '
RATE •h'
many factors control the flow rate. For example, the rate
Fig. 1—Typical inflow performance curves.
by gas lift may exceed all other methods if relatively
high volumes of free gas must be handled by the pump-
ing mechanism, whereas electrical pumping may show
higher rates for high productivity water wells and low
GOR oil wells. NATURAL FLOW (NF)
The procedures for preparation of these intake curves BEAM PUMP (BP)
has been presented by Agena. 2 A short summary of the
method of preparation is presented here. It is suggested JET PUMPING (JP)
that the first intake curve for any well will be prepared GAS LIFT (GL)
ELECTRICAL
assuming that the well will flow naturally. Fig. 3 shows PUMPING (EP)
that this well does flow naturally. If the tubing intake
curve falls above the IPR curve as noted in Fig. 3, the
well is dead. PRESSURE
well.
PRESSURE
RATE ¥•
RATE ¥•
a
PRESSURE STABLE
RATE
RATE ¥•
d
PRESSURE
RATE ¥•
PRESSURE
b
RATE %
e
Fig. 4—(a) dead well, (b) dead well, (c) dead or severe heading well, (d) well flowing at Position 2, (3) stable flow.
the separator pressure controls the suction pressure to average reservoir pressures, the node at the bottom of
the compressor and, hence, controls horsepower re- the well is
quirements.
SAFETY HORIZONTAL
VALVE
WELLHEAD ’wh
PRESSURE
TUBING INTAKE PRESSURE - SEPARATOR PRESSURE 3• FLOWLINE
FLOWLINECHOKE ISOLATED
VERTICAL
TUOINO ’SAFETY VALVE
t
’RESTnICTION
RATE ••$•
Ftg. 6—Solution at wellhead.
a
SEPARATOR
PRESSURE
ISOLATED
SEPARATOR PRESSURE
SEPARATOR
PRESSURE SEPARATOR
LENGTH
CHOKE
PRESSURE DOWNSTREAM OF CHOKE
WELLHEAD
PRESSURE
RATE •g•
b
Fig. 7—Effect of separator pressure.
BELOW DOWNHOLE
RESTRICTION
TOTAL A »+=«
TUBING INTAKE
CURVE
PRESSURE
> TOTAL
PRESSURE 0 VOLUMET R IC
RATE
STOGK TANK
RATE
RATE •g•
RATE •g•
Fig. 11—(a) typical pump installation, (b) pressure traverse
for
pumping system, (c) pumping-system-rate solution Fig. 12—IPR curves for total fluid production including gas.
at bottom
OCTOBER 1982 of well. 2391
SEPARATOR
FEET
EFFECTIVE
2OOO LIFT POSITION
FEET
.T
Pt • 3000 psi
PD • 1200 psi
A Pp • Pg - 0 psi • I2OO -O
PUMP AT EFFECTIVE PUMP AT IOOOO FEET
LIFT POINT I2OO0 Pg • 3200 psi APpggp• 2000 psi
2000 •f ‹xc • 1200 psi
FEET PUMP INTAKE PRESSURE • O
PI • 2.0
Fig. 13—(a) effective lift piston, (b) pump set at effective lift, (c) pump set at bottom, (d) pump set at 10,000 ft.
assume that the pump must lift from its setting depth, the
4,500 ft (1371.6 m), such as tubing loss, flowline loss,
unit may be designed for greater horsepower than re-
and separator pressure.
quired. For example, if a well is 12,000 ft (3657.6 m)
If we assume that the pumping system is at 10,000 ñ
deep, has a static pressure of 3,000 psi (20.68 MPa), PI
(3048 m), or even on bottom at 12,000 ñ (3657.6 m),
is 2 (assumed constant), gas liquid ratio = 300 scf/bbl
the pump must lift only from the effective lift point of
(53.5 std m 3 31. wellhead pressure is 160 psi (1.10 4,500 ft (1371.6 m). Another way to visualize this
MPa), and is completed with 2 '/z-in. (6.35-cm) tubing,
what is the depth of effective liñ for a rate of 2,000 B/D concept is to note that the pump must create a certain
(317.97 m 3 /d)? The flowing bottomhole pressure (BHP) discharge pressure to overcome all pressure losses and
required for the well to yield this rate is
head above the effective lift point, which is also the Up
3,000 —(2,000/2) — 2,000 psi (13.79 MPa). The effec— that the pump must create if it is set at the effective lift
tive liñ point is that depth to which the flowing BHP is point. In the previous example, this Up is 1,200 psi
capable of supporting the fluids in the tubing string. (8.27 MPa) and is approximately the same regardless of
The appropriate .nultiphase flow correlation shows this the pump position, neglecting any effect of changes
to be 7,500 ft (7.- 86 m) from bottom or at a depth of caused by multiphase flow calculations. Fig. 13 clarifies
4,500 ft (1371.6 my (Fig. 13). Theoretically, a pumping this with the pump set at different positions. Note that
system could be set at 4,500 ft (1371.6 m) and, by discharge pressure is the same if the pump is on the
creating a zero intake pressure at this point, the bottom or at 10,000 ñ (3048 m), but less at 4,500 ñ
objective flow rate could be obtained. The discharge (1371.6 m) because of free gas lightening the pressure
head above the pump then would consist of all head and traverse. However, the total fluid volume (oil plus free
pressure losses above gas) is much higher at 4,500 ft (1371.6 m).
There are many reasons for setting a pump either abnormal sand production in these areas, the free
below or near the effective liñ point. Obviously, the pumps are replaced
pump should be submerged enough to allow sufficiently
high entry pressure to prevent cavitation and to over-
come any entry loss restrictions that might exist across a
downhole gas separator. Submergence in feet (meters)
is defined as the fluid level in the annulus above the
pump under operating conditions. The desirability of
creating low pump intake pressures may restrict some
pumping systems, and a general nile of thumb of 300-
psi (2.07-MPa) pump intake pressure for oil wells
pumping gas will restrict some pumps. The handling of
free gas volumes through the pump makes the deeper
setting position more attractive.
Jet Pump. The jet pump is not very efficient for lifting
from great depths. It also requires a higher percentage
of submergence than do the other lift systems. A
minimum of 20' o submergence is needed for most
applications and even greater for better efficiencies.
However, some jet pumps are set at l I ,tD0 ñ (3352.8
m) and are producing 2fD to 300 B/D (31.8 to 47.7 m
3/d).
Paraffin. Accumulation
of paraffin in the upper
portions of the tubing
string, wellhead, or
flowline will cause
backpressure that
reduces efficiency.
Removal or prevention
is required. Sucker rod
pumping has an ad-
vantage over other lift
methods since the rods
provide continuous
scraping action.
OCTOBER 1982 Scrapers or guides may 2393
TABLE 3—GIVEN DATA, EXAMPLE 1 " Relative Economics. Six economic factors represent the
most important parameters in selection of artificial lift
Depth, ft (m) 8,000 (2438.4) equipment: (1) initial capital investment, (2) monthly
G D asing
O size,
R in.
, A
l (cm)
l
s
c
f p
o
( w
s e
t r
d
s
m o
* u
/ r
m c
* e
)
s
W
a a
t v
e a
r i
l
p a
r b
o l
d e
u
c p
t
i
o ,
n
, p
s
% i
a
R
a (
t M
e P
, a
)
B PI
/ unt
D il
rea
chi
(
ng
m
p
——
3
1,6
00
/ psi
d (11
) .03
°APl MP
T a)
u p
bi ,
n p
g s
si i
z a
e
, (
in M
. P
( a
c )
m
)
O C
References
1 . Brown, K.E. , ei al.: Ttie
Technolog y of Ariific’ial Li ft
Methods,
PennWell Books, Tulsa
(1979) II-B.
2. Agena, B. , “Preparation of
Tubing Intake Curves for
Artificial Lift Systems,”
MS thesis, U. of Tulsa
(1982).