Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Torres Vs CA Case Digest
Torres Vs CA Case Digest
SC RULING: YES.
Contracts bind the parties not only to what has been expressly stipulated but also
to all necessary consequences accdg to the nature in keeping with good faith, usage and
law.
Art 1773, as basis by petitioners that contract is void, was intended primarily to
protect third parties from fraud thus the inventory. On the case at bar, there are no third
parties involved. Petitioners cannot deny the contract and then recognize it in accordance
to what suits their purpose.
The nullity of partnership will not prevent courts from considering the joint
venture agreement an ordinary contract.
Art 1422, basis that contract is void, due to lack of valid consideration, is
misplaced. The consideration in the contract is the expectation of profits from the
subdivision project.