Professional Documents
Culture Documents
U.S. Drug Prices vs. The World
U.S. Drug Prices vs. The World
Americans usually pay approximately four times more the price of drugs compared to
other international countries. Countries with the same Par Capita Income as the U.S. typically
have lower drug prices. Other countries like France and Germany exceed the U.S. in the Per
Capita spending of drugs (Hwang & Kesselheim, 2016). This cost is due to the competition,
which is limited among the companies for drugs. Nevertheless, since then, growth in spending
has completely exceeded that of other developed nations. Americans use fewer drug
prescriptions compared to other European countries, and when they use them, they are more
However, the complexity of the U.S. system of healthcare and the liquidity of the supply
chain system of drugs bring in conditions that cause the maximization of prices and limited
competition. All wholesale manufacturers and distributors in the U.S. have developed
mechanisms that help them maximize profits. Almost all other countries, except the U.S., have
policies that tend to lower the drug prices (Kanavos et al., 2013). These policies include control
of prices or regulations that limit the cost-effectiveness thresholds, reference pricing, and drugs’
profitability. This does not provide an answer as to why drug prices tend to be high in the U.S.
but rather how some countries lower their drug prices. Other countries are not willing and do not
feel the need to pay high prices compared to the U.S., who are always ready to pay for high
prices.
Nonetheless, there is always a need for the U.S. to lower their drug prices while still
encouraging manufacturers to make more innovations. Lowering these prices will lead to
significant savings in the country. Each drug is grouped according to classes in which they have
the same effect. For example, all types of ibuprofen belong to the same class since they work
actively the same (Hwang & Kesselheim, 2016). This class would include other drugs like
U.S DRUG PRICES VS THE WORLD 3
naproxen and aspirin since they have the same agents. For any drug at a given price, the insurer
pays a set amount, that is, a reference drug price for a specific medicine in a given class level. A
company for drugs can choose to set a higher price for a drug, and in case a consumer agrees to
Additionally, by setting the price of reference to be a little bit low, the manufacturers of
the drugs can reduce the prices of drugs that are good substitutes. If the manufacturers do not do
this, then the consumers will opt for products that cost lower. By doing this, reference pricing
does not pull down innovation (Zwier, 2015). Instead, it encourages a different way of doing it.
This promotes cost-effectiveness since consumers avoid high out-of-pocket costs, and the market
also rewards innovations that lead to drugs that are low priced. Also, this will help Americans to
reduce their spending on health. The nursing leader can act as a change agent in this issue. This
is by providing forums that support and influence others towards the implementation of
successful programs in organizations of health (Kanavos et al., 2013). In this case, for instance,
he or she can inspire others to adopt this change in lowering the prices of drugs in the country.
In conclusion, the prices of drugs in the United States are very high in comparison to
other countries. This is because the companies that manufacture drugs have limited competition
and therefore charge very high prices. The U.S. government needs to consider a change in these
prices in the economy and view it as a positive change. The nursing leaders can also play a role
References
Hwang, T. J., & Kesselheim, A. S. (2016). Public referendum on drug prices in the US: will it
Kanavos, P., Ferrario, A., Vandoros, S., & Anderson, G. F. (2013). Higher US branded drug
prices and spending compared to other countries may stem partly from quick uptake of
Zwier, P. J. (2015). High Prices in the US for Life-Saving Drugs: Collective Bargaining through
Tort Law. Marq. Benefits & Soc. Welfare L. Rev., 17, 203.