Professional Documents
Culture Documents
This Content Downloaded From 157.40.143.45 On Mon, 12 Oct 2020 05:57:51 UTC
This Content Downloaded From 157.40.143.45 On Mon, 12 Oct 2020 05:57:51 UTC
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide
range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and
facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at
https://about.jstor.org/terms
Philosophy Documentation Center is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend
access to Journal of the Society of Christian Ethics
venerable theologians. This perspective does not mesh well with today's view
of authority, and some readers may bristle at the possible insinuation that "the
Fathers" understood God better than we can. However, even these readers will
appreciate the way Pinckaers distinguishes between what they understood well
then and what we understand well now. The community of Defending Probabil
ism is of a pair of like-minded theologians focused on a narrow problem. Each
has an eye devoted to history, but both are also accountable to their own con
temporary theological and ecclesiological context. Fleming and Caramuel seem
to meet in agreement on several points, not the least of which is remembering
what it means to be human together before God. Their ways of approaching
history and theology centralize that understanding, and their partnership re
inforces that understanding and mutual Christian gratitude.
Nancy M. Rourke
Canisius College
Review of
Laura M. Hartman
Augustana College