y NUR AicRAILAH — 9180626 mY 1 vs yer Data Mean | Miata gure | Meee ee | Gy 9 ONE Ig)” Bron Re ys = i ML gman | vere | eg ge | [eae 438429 13°46 é pS tet (ela ee BO [ssa 24116 = G36 -30-4¥ at = 36 31 36 rT xg arte brond 2 De a5 | 36 = 436431 2 aaa s0-4 Ne 7 Poets = 0-01 = a = 00-3 Tard 3 a _ ay t36 498108 Aisles G9 = 2004) — = 0-81 24-8 Brond y as Ty [32] p< cotta t33 Te pa = @8-b - 30-4) os Qe = 20-4 ae || Sra Heyy Tot ay ety = | 2s 68-0 Reon | 3-6 $30-84 befweee 29-8 $386 group ees. | sew | aes SEs BAY gots ce atyqa Galeulation MSE Cao 4CF-1) * + S60-a 3 = 99-433a3 ra045 k-t gets a [pe soapaace| mSE a0 4S = 0-343 1/0 g@-wy 945-1)7 IbNUR AINAQILAH 2180636 Hy Heomal = Harand 1 = Mpands «Maran 43 = BHarondy | {hetween Brandi, Brand 2, brand and Brand 4. There_Is ho srgntfreant difference in the means of the batteries Hvwrmat_# Hpranay + Aranda # Ascands # Haran 4 1 CAt teas} four of thems means of the batteries brand between Brond 1, Brond@., Brand 3 or Brand y ate differant) 1KOSONGKAN Assizgnm en} Chap{ey_ 4 RUANG IN! grand 4 Brand 2 Brand 3 ornorne a poe 28 ay 20. 20 36 36 3a _t 34 3. 28 38 28 32. 28, 28s 94 a4 33 2S Ai-the S% sign ficance lovel does there appear to be a diguence in mean \fetine arong the four brands of batteries i Anova [Pisiaies [ss sk F | Pevajue Perit Rerween, 68-2 o2ts83" | ogy | Orgs [3+ ay group wid hin eae 44x Te SOE Tora Sbo-2 | ‘ Take d= 005 Conclusion : Fail to reject Ay Crikcal_tegion : Fy y = 3-24 There is no significant difference in the means of 0-7393 < 3-34 _batteris between brondt 4 Be brand, brand 3 and ——_— ee brandi ota 3aYy —*——__