IN THE COURT OF CIVIL JUDGE JUNIOR DIVISION

AT MAPUSA

Regular Civil Suit No. 147/09/D

SMT. MANORATHI ATMARAM SANGODKAR

Alias shubhangi shailesh lotlikar,
& other ….Plaintiffs

V/S

Shri Antonio A. Avita Cruz de Ataide Lobo

& another ….Defendants

Application for Amendment

The Plaintiff states and submits as under:-

1. The plaintiff states that there are certain typographical errors

that has occasioned in the application for abetment which was
notice by the under signed advocate only when he was
preparing written arguments.

2. It is submitted that there is a need to clarify certain statement

made in the application and accordingly the plaintiff are filling
the present application.

3. The plaintiffs states that in para 4, second line it is stated that

the defendant no. 1 never brought to the notice of the court that
defendant no. 2 expired. This line needs to be clarify as under
“The Defendant no.1 brought to the notice of “A” Court
Incharge of “D” court at Mapusa . that Defendant no. 2 expired
behind the back of the plaintiffs of their lawyer.

4. In para 4, 3rd line it is stated that even the learned Judge was not
aware until on 17th Aug 2012 as will be seen from the Rosnama .
The plaintiff would like to clarify the above statement as under
”The learner Judge of the “F” Court so that the defendant no. 2
has expired 17th Aug 2012. The above statement is therefore
required to be deleted and substituted with the clarificatory
statement.

5. In para 14, 15th line, it is mentioned as 2012 which may be

corrected to 2013.
6. In para 15th, 3rd line, 12th April 2012 may be corrected to 12th
April 2012.

7. No procedure would be caused defendant no.2 or to his

advocate who is hell bent to more hill out or mole. On the
contrary it will facilitate the court to do complete justice to the
application filed by the plaintiffs and the objection caused by
the defendant.

8. The plaintiff has shown sufficient cause to grant this

application. The clarification that sought to be in corporate in
the application for the abetment as the stated above are based
on the documents.

Prayer:-

(A) It is, therefore that the application for amendment to the

application for abetment dated 12th April 2013 the allows
unit the intenstad of Justice.

Mapusa :-

Date:-05.08.2013 Adv. for applicant.