Realism and Complex Disorder outlines key differences between realism and complex interdependence in international relations theory. Realism assumes that states are coherent units and that military force is an effective policy tool. Complex interdependence instead sees multiple channels of connection between states and a reduced role of hierarchy and military force. The document also discusses how complex interdependence sees international organizations as playing a more significant role compared to realism, and how it can help governments form transnational coalitions.
Realism and Complex Disorder outlines key differences between realism and complex interdependence in international relations theory. Realism assumes that states are coherent units and that military force is an effective policy tool. Complex interdependence instead sees multiple channels of connection between states and a reduced role of hierarchy and military force. The document also discusses how complex interdependence sees international organizations as playing a more significant role compared to realism, and how it can help governments form transnational coalitions.
Realism and Complex Disorder outlines key differences between realism and complex interdependence in international relations theory. Realism assumes that states are coherent units and that military force is an effective policy tool. Complex interdependence instead sees multiple channels of connection between states and a reduced role of hierarchy and military force. The document also discusses how complex interdependence sees international organizations as playing a more significant role compared to realism, and how it can help governments form transnational coalitions.