Professional Documents
Culture Documents
ISCR Rating Sheets I and II PDF
ISCR Rating Sheets I and II PDF
ISCR Rating Sheets I and II PDF
Name of Student :
Course and Year :
Semester and Year :
Course No. : Course Title:
Course No. of Units : Schedule :
COMPUTATIONS
_______________________________
Arch./EnP. NELCO PAUL P. COQUIA
MAEHP-MAJOR IN URBAN AND REGIONAL PLANNING
Date: __________________
PANGASINAN STATE UNIVERSTIY
URDANETA CITY CAMPUS
COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING AND ARCHITECTURE
DEPARTMENT OF ARCHITECTURE
RATING SHEET II
GRADING RUBRIC FOR GRAPHICAL REQUIREMENTS FOR ARCHITECTURE
LEVEL OF ASSESSMENT
COMMENTS
Descriptive Rating Does not meet expectations Meet expectation Exceeds expectations
_______________________________
Arch./EnP. NELCO PAUL P. COQUIA
MAEHP-MAJOR IN URBAN AND REGIONAL PLANNING
Date: __________________
PANGASINAN STATE UNIVERSTIY
URDANETA CITY CAMPUS
COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING AND ARCHITECTURE
DEPARTMENT OF ARCHITECTURE
RATING SHEET I
GRADING RUBRIC FOR WRITTEN REQUIREMENTS FOR ARCHITECTURE
LEVEL OF ASSESSMENT
CRITERIA Inadequate=1 Adequate=2 Above Average=3
(BELOW STANDARD- (MEETS STANDARD- (EXCEEDS STANDARD-
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT) DEVELOPING) GOAL)
COMPLIANCE AND Fails to follow format Generally meet Meet format and
TIMELESS and requirements format and requirements
requirements
Incorrect margins and Generally correct Margins and spacing
spacing margins and spacing are correct
Neatness of essay Essay is neat but Essay is neat and
needs may have some correctly
attention assembly errors assembled
Submitted late Submitted on-time Submitted in
advance
LEVEL OF CONTENT Shows some thinking Content indicates Content indicates
AND DEVELOPMENT reasoning but most thinking and original thinking and
ideas are reasoning applied develops ideas with
underdeveloped and with original thought sufficient and firm
unoriginal on a few ideas. evidence.
Main point lack Main points are Main points well
detailed development. present with limited developed with
Ideas are vague with detail and quantity. Critical
little evidence of development. Some thinking is waved
critical thinking critical thinking is into points.
present.
QUALITY OF WRITING Writing is weak Writing is adequate Writing is of good
quality
Numerous Some grammatical No grammatical or
grammatical and and spelling errors spelling errors
spelling errors apparent apparent
apparent.
Organization is poor Organization is Organization is
logical excellent
Style is not Style is appropriate Style is exemplary
appropriate to to discipline
discipline.
COMMENTS
Descriptive Rating Does not meet expectations Meet expectation Exceeds expectations
_______________________________
Arch./EnP. NELCO PAUL P. COQUIA
MAEHP-MAJOR IN URBAN AND REGIONAL PLANNING
Date: __________________