PANGASINAN STATE UNIVERSTIY

URDANETA CITY CAMPUS

COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING AND ARCHITECTURE
DEPARTMENT OF ARCHITECTURE

Name of Student :
Course and Year :
Semester and Year :
Course No. : Course Title:
Course No. of Units : Schedule :

INDIVIDUAL STUDENT CLASS RECORD (ISCR)

RQMNT. NO. DESCRIPTION RATING REMARKS

GRADING SYSTEM: Grades are computed using the following criteria;

30% QUIZESSAY, DATA GATHERING REQUIREMENTS
40% MID-TERM/FINAL EXAM (Major Examination)
30% STUDENTSHIP, TERMPAPERS, AND PROJECTS

COMPUTATIONS

_______________________________
Arch./EnP. NELCO PAUL P. COQUIA
MAEHP-MAJOR IN URBAN AND REGIONAL PLANNING

Date: __________________
 PANGASINAN STATE UNIVERSTIY
URDANETA CITY CAMPUS
COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING AND ARCHITECTURE
DEPARTMENT OF ARCHITECTURE

RATING SHEET II
GRADING RUBRIC FOR GRAPHICAL REQUIREMENTS FOR ARCHITECTURE
LEVEL OF ASSESSMENT

CRITERIA Inadequate=1 Adequate=2 Above Average=3

(BELOW STANDARD- (MEETS STANDARD- (EXCEEDS STANDARD-
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT) DEVELOPING) GOAL)
COMPLIANCE AND Fails to follow format Generally meet Meet format and
TIMELESS and requirements format and requirements
requirements
Incorrect margins, Generally correct Margins, spacing,
spacing and margins, spacing and and indentations are
indentation indentations correct
Neatness of essay Essay is neat but Essay is neat and
needs may have some correctly
attention assembly errors assembled
Submitted late Submitted on-time Submitted in
advance
LEVEL OF CONTENT Shows some thinking Content indicates Content indicates
AND DEVELOPMENT reasoning but most thinking and original thinking and
ideas are reasoning applied develops ideas with
underdeveloped and with original thought sufficient and firm
unoriginal on a few ideas. evidence.
Main point lack Main points are Main points well
detailed development. present with limited developed with
Ideas are vague with detail and quantity. Critical
little evidence of development. Some thinking is waved
critical thinking critical thinking is into points.
present.
QUALITY OF Overall presentation is Overall presentation Overall presentation
PRESENTATION AND weak is adequate is of good quality
WORKMANSHIP Numerous graphic Some graphic No graphic
convention errors convention errors convention errors
apparent. apparent apparent
Organization is poor Organization is Organization is
logical excellent
Presentation style is Presentation style is Presentation style is
not appropriate to appropriate to exemplary
discipline. discipline

COMMENTS

Descriptive Rating Does not meet expectations Meet expectation Exceeds expectations

_______________________________
Arch./EnP. NELCO PAUL P. COQUIA
MAEHP-MAJOR IN URBAN AND REGIONAL PLANNING

Date: __________________
 PANGASINAN STATE UNIVERSTIY
URDANETA CITY CAMPUS
COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING AND ARCHITECTURE
DEPARTMENT OF ARCHITECTURE

RATING SHEET I
GRADING RUBRIC FOR WRITTEN REQUIREMENTS FOR ARCHITECTURE
LEVEL OF ASSESSMENT
CRITERIA Inadequate=1 Adequate=2 Above Average=3
(BELOW STANDARD- (MEETS STANDARD- (EXCEEDS STANDARD-
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT) DEVELOPING) GOAL)
COMPLIANCE AND Fails to follow format Generally meet Meet format and
TIMELESS and requirements format and requirements
requirements
Incorrect margins and Generally correct Margins and spacing
spacing margins and spacing are correct
Neatness of essay Essay is neat but Essay is neat and
needs may have some correctly
attention assembly errors assembled
Submitted late Submitted on-time Submitted in
advance
LEVEL OF CONTENT Shows some thinking Content indicates Content indicates
AND DEVELOPMENT reasoning but most thinking and original thinking and
ideas are reasoning applied develops ideas with
underdeveloped and with original thought sufficient and firm
unoriginal on a few ideas. evidence.
Main point lack Main points are Main points well
detailed development. present with limited developed with
Ideas are vague with detail and quantity. Critical
little evidence of development. Some thinking is waved
critical thinking critical thinking is into points.
present.
QUALITY OF WRITING Writing is weak Writing is adequate Writing is of good
quality
Numerous Some grammatical No grammatical or
grammatical and and spelling errors spelling errors
spelling errors apparent apparent
apparent.
Organization is poor Organization is Organization is
logical excellent
Style is not Style is appropriate Style is exemplary
appropriate to to discipline
discipline.

COMMENTS

Descriptive Rating Does not meet expectations Meet expectation Exceeds expectations

_______________________________
Arch./EnP. NELCO PAUL P. COQUIA
MAEHP-MAJOR IN URBAN AND REGIONAL PLANNING

Date: __________________