Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Suma 2020 Assessment 1
Suma 2020 Assessment 1
Suma 2020 Assessment 1
A culturally responsive curriculum is one of the essential ways in which to engage Indigenous
learners. Such a curriculum must be infused with rich connections to the Indigenous students’
cultural and linguistic backgrounds within their family and community contexts (Belgrade,
Mitchell & Arquero, 2002). Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander students should be able to see
themselves (their identities and culture) in the curriculum of every learning area and should be
able to participate fully in the curriculum. For this to happen they first need teachers who are
skilled and are culturally competent in the local context and second provide high expectations
for learning that incorporates Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander perspectives. A culturally
responsive curriculum is one which makes linkages between local Aboriginal and Torres Strait
Islander histories and cultures and the learning areas in the curriculum. AITSL gives the example
of ACSSU048 which discusses the Earth’s rotation on its axis causing regular changes including
night and day. Indigenous Australian use their knowledge of astronomy for time-keeping
through observing the rising and setting of the stars, solar cycle and lunar phases to indicate
special events. The curriculum also highlights positive representations of local Aboriginal and
Torres Strait Islander people in art, sport and NAIDOC as well as ways in which people fill key
roles in their own and the broader community such as the Yarning Strong set of chapter books
that introduce a range of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander authors. As a cross-curriculum
priority in the Australian curriculum, the Aboriginal studies framework consists of three key
concepts; Country/Place, Culture and People. There are nine organising ideas that help teachers
link these three interconnected concepts to learning areas in the curriculum and to the general
capabilities; particularly to personal and social capability, ethical understanding and
intercultural understanding. However, as per Lowe and Yunkaporta’s (2018) critical analysis of
the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander content of the curriculum, the stated intention of
ACARA to ensure “that all young Australians will be given the opportunity to gain a deeper
understanding and appreciation of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander histories and cultures”,
(Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority, 2011), has not been achieved.
Lowe and Yunkaporta (2018) indicate that the curriculum content does not provide teachers
with the tools to create learning experiences that would enable students to understand the
depth of the histories and cultures of the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people and their
significance within Australia.
Culturally competent pedagogy has been backed up by policy as long ago as 1975 when the
Education for Aborigines: Report to the Schools Commission (Aboriginal Consultative Group)
was created and in the 1990s the National Statement of Principles and Standards for more
Culturally Inclusive Schooling in the 21st Century and A Model of More Culturally Inclusive and
Educationally Effective Schools (Schwab, 2018). According to Karmel (1973), policy
recommended a grass-roots approach to the control of schools, equality for the disadvantaged,
encouraging diversity, community involvement, building core skills and lifelong learning
(Schwab, 2018). Although these principles have evolved over the years, they have been
significant in developing Indigenous education policy (Price & Rogers, 2019). In 2000-2001 the
‘What Works’ project was meant to accelerate the achievement of educational equality for
Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander students. The Department of Education and the Arts
prepared guidelines that embedded Indigenous perspectives within school practices so that
Indigenous students ‘develop their sense of identity and pride in their culture, as well as
building knowledge and understanding of their cultural heritage, thus contributing to
developing a positive self-concept’ (Department of Education and the Arts, QLD, 2005).
However, despite these policies and their implication of finding solutions, the majority of
teachers and schools remain unskilled with regards to relating to Aboriginal and Torres Strait
Islander parents, caregivers and students. This is due to policies proceeding along a course of
untested assumptions such as that all Indigenous students are alike (they have a similar
lifestyle, beliefs, choices and needs) and that principles of ‘consultation, ‘implementation’ and
‘community control’ are included without consideration for how it would actually look in the
context of Indigenous Australian communities (Schwab, 2018). Also, education policies have
been allowed to continue their process of starting reform then stopping repeatedly. There
needs to be continuity, where appropriate programs are resourced with a sustained effort from
state and territory education systems (Price & Rogers, 2019). Also, as recommended by the
DETYA (Commonwealth Department of Education, Training and Youth Affairs) study in 2000,
partnering with the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander community throughout the
educational process, including policy making is key (McRae et al, 2000).
Partnering with community forms the crux of creating a culturally- responsive pedagogy. When
departments of school education enter into partnerships with Aboriginal and Torres Strait
Islander people throughout the whole educational process they empower them to become
active partners. Hence, the knowledge and culture of the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander
communities is valued and the programs that are created are more likely to be effective (Price
& Rogers, 2019). ‘What Works’ provides advice to all teachers about how school staff members
can develop partnerships. It mentions the importance of kinship to Indigenous peoples, that the
most important unit is family (over the generations and networks of relationships) who will
always be the educators of their children. Hence, if the interests of families and schools are
aligned and there is mutual support between school and home, education will be more
successful (What Works Team, 2009). Partnering begins with pre-service teachers having a yarn
with a member of the Aboriginal community in a setting preferred by the community member.
It has been proven that through conversations like this preservice teachers are motivated to
broaden their limited understanding of Aboriginal culture. Also, the creation of policy to close
the educational gap must also be a joint venture undertaken with Indigenous peoples and their
children (Price & Rogers, 2019). As Dr Chris Sarra said, ‘It is time for doing things with
Indigenous communities and not to Indigenous communities’ (2008). Teachers must discuss
with their students and their parents and caregivers about what it is that can be done together.
This involves making informal contact, getting to know each other rather than doing formal
business, looking for ways to celebrate and acknowledge community events, finding ways for
parents to be involved in the school (canteen, sports coaching, homework centres). A practical
application of partnering is through use of PLPs (personal learning plans) where a teacher sits
with the student’s family and formulates a personal learning plan based on the student’s
interests, talents, future plans, current class content, how the partners will contribute and how
success will be celebrated (What Works Team, 2009).
References
Abrams, E., Taylor, P. C., & Guo, C. J. (2013). Contextualizing culturally relevant science and
mathematics teaching for indigenous learning. International Journal of Science and
Mathematics Education, 11(1), 1-21.
AITSL (Australian Institute of Teaching Standards and Leadership). (2011) . National Professional
Standards for Teachers (the Standards). Melbourne: Educational Services Australia.
Department of Education and the Arts, Qld . (2005). Closing the Gap Education Strategy.
McRae , D. ,et. al. (2000). What Works? Explorations in improving outcomes for Indigenous
students. Canberra: Australian Curriculum Studies Association.
Main, D., Nichol, R., & Fennell, R. (2000). Reconciling pedagogy and health sciences to promote
Indigenous health. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health, 24(2), 211-213.
Price, K., & Rogers, J. (Eds.). (2019). Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander education. Cambridge
University Press.
Sarra, C. (2007). Stronger, Smarter, Sarra. Teacher: The National Education Magazine, (Mar
2007), 32.
Sarra, C. (2008). ‘Getting it Right: Indigenous Leadership and Beyond’. Keynote Address to Jobs
Australia National Conference, 9 September.
What Works Team. (2009). Conversations > relationships > partnerships: A resource for the
community. National Curriculum Services: Commonwealth of Australia.
What Works Team. (2010). The Work Program. Improving outcomes for Indigenous students.
The Workbook and guide for school educators, 3rd, revised edition. National Curriculum
Services: Australia.