Journal of Engineering Sciences Vol 9, Issue 1, 2018

ISSN NO: 0377-9254

TIME HISTROY ANALYSIS OF MULTI SOREY BUILDING FOR

HIGHRISE (G+10) STRUCTURES

M BALARAM D. APPANNA MURTY

M.Tech Student, Department Of Civil Structural, Assistant Professor, Department Of Civil Structural,
Lenora College of Engineering Rampachodavaram Lenora College of Engineering Rampachodavaram,
East Godavari, AP, India East Godavari, AP, India

ABSTRACT:
Dynamic analysis can be performed by two methods one is response spectrum method
and another is time history method. In response spectrum method, the values are taken as per
code IS 1893 (part 1) 2002 but in time history method the previous Earthquake data is used. The
loads which are used they are as p er IS standards. In present study, the time history analysis
is to be used because time history analysis is more economical then response spectrum
method. Multi-story regular buildings with (G+10) stories have been modelled using software
ETabs for seismic zone II in India. And by using time history method for multi-storey building
the story displacement and story drift calculated. Time history analysis is also known as non-
linear dynamic analysis. A time history is the advanced method of dynamic analysis. The time
history analysis method is also capability to incorporate harmonic forcing function which
can described by sinusoidal curves with a specified arrival time, frequency, amplitude, and
duration.
Keywords: Dynamic analysis, response spectrum, time history, E tabs, multi-storey building
1. INTRODUCTION: those tall structures. Reinforced concrete
multi-storied buildings are very complex to
In the earthquake, prone regions, the chance model as structural systems for analysis.
of failure of building is increase due to act of Usually, they are modeled as two-
earthquake. Because the various seismic dimensional or three-dimensional frame
force act on the building when the systems using finite beam elements. Since
earthquake come in that region. The building earthquake forces are random in nature and
which do not resist these seismic forces they unpredictable, the engineering tools need to
may suffer extensive damage, collapse or be sharpened for analyzing structures under
break. To improve or save these building the the action of these forces. Earthquake loads
seismic evaluation is required therefore the are required to be carefully modeled so as to
dynamic and statics analysis is required. assess the real behavior of structure with a
Therefore, it is necessary to study the clear understanding that damage is expected
variation in seismic behavior of multi- but it should be regulated.
storied RC building in terms of various
responses such as story displacement and ANALYSIS METHODS
story drift. EQUIVALENT STATIC ANALYSIS
This approach defines a series of forces
Time History analysis acting on a building to represent the effect of
All over world, there is high demand for earthquake ground motion, typically defined
construction of tall buildings due to by a seismic design response spectrum. It
increasing urbanization and spiraling assumes that the building responds in its
population, and earthquakes have the fundamental mode. For this to be true, the
potential for causing the greatest damages to building must be low-rise and must not twist

www.jespublication.com Page No:7

Journal of Engineering Sciences
significantly when the ground moves. The
response is read from a design response
spectrum, given the natural frequency of the
building (either calculated or defined by the
building code). The applicability of this
method is extended in many building codes
by applying factors to account for higher
buildings with some higher modes, and for
low levels of twisting. To account for effects
due to "yielding" of the structure, many
codes apply modification factors that reduce
the design forces (e.g. force reduction
factors).
RESPONSE SPECTRUM ANALYSIS
This approach permits the multiple modes of
response of a building to be taken into
account (in the frequency domain). This is
required in many building codes for all
except for very simple or very complex
structures. The response of a structure can
be defined as a combination of many special
shapes (modes) that in a vibrating string
correspond to the "harmonics". Computer
analysis can be used to determine these
modes for a structure. For each mode, a
response is read from the design spectrum,
based on the modal frequency and the modal
mass, and they are then combined to provide
an estimate of the total response of the
structure. In this we have to calculate the
magnitude of forces in all directions i.e. X,
Y & Z and then see the effects on the
building.. Combination methods include the
following
LINEAR DYNAMIC ANALYSIS
Static procedures are appropriate when
higher mode effects are not significant. This
is generally true for short, regular buildings.
Therefore, for tall buildings, buildings with
tensional irregularities, or non-orthogonal
systems, a dynamic procedure is required. In
the linear dynamic procedure, the building is
modelled as a multi-degree-of-freedom
www.jespublication.com
Vol 9, Issue 1, 2018
ISSN NO: 0377-9254
(MDOF) system with a linear elastic
stiffness matrix and an equivalent viscous
damping matrix. The seismic input is
modelled using either modal spectral
analysis or time history analysis but in both
cases, the corresponding internal forces and
displacements are determined using linear
elastic analysis. The advantage of these
linear dynamic procedures with respect to
linear static procedures is that higher modes
can be considered.
REQUIREMENTS
For FNA application, analytical models
should:
- Be primarily linear-elastic.
- Have a limited number of predefined
nonlinear members.
- Be structurally stable without the nonlinear
elements.
- Lump nonlinear behaviour within link or
support objects only.
LEVEL OF ACCURACY OF THE
RESULTS
The solution of the modal equations depends
on the time step and number and type of
modes used. Results may also be sensitive to
physical parameters, loading conditions, and
the analytical technique applied, especially
with irregular structures and advanced
nonlinear systems. Since FNA is an accurate
and efficient analysis method, it may be
worthwhile to apply this technique to a
series of models which simulate variable
computational scenario. For example,
different time steps and modes shapes, to
provide a comparison study. Damping is
handled differently between these two
analysis methods. FNA limits proportional
damping at the frequency extremes to
0.99995 that of critical, while direct
integration uses mass- and stiffness-
proportional damping in which damping at
very low and very high frequencies may
exceed critical.
2. RELATED STUDY:
Page No:8
Journal of Engineering Sciences
DEAD LOADS (DL): All permanent
constructions of the structure form the dead
loads. The dead load comprises of the self-
weight, weight of walls, partitions floor
finishes and the other permanent
constructions in the buildings. The loads
considered in this project are as per IS 456
2000.
LIVE LOAD (LL): Live load or imposed
load is defined as the load on the structure
due to moving weight. Imposed load is
produced by the intended use or occupancy
of a building including the weight of
movable partitions, distributed and
concentrated loads, load due to impact and
vibration and dust loads. Imposed loads do
not include loads due to wind, seismic
activity, snow, and loads imposed due to
temperature changes to which the structure
will be subjected to, creep and shrinkage of
the structure, the differential settlements to
which the structure may undergo.
3. METHODOLOGY:
Main AIM: To analyze a multi-storeyed
RC building (G +10 Storey) for earthquake
intensity III, by using different methods
such as IS method, response spectrum
analysis and Time history analysis. To
compare seismic behaviour of multi-
storeyed RC building for particular
earthquake intensity in terms of responses
To study the effects of different Seismic
zones on performance of multi-storey
building in terms of seismic responses such
as base shear, storey displacement. To
know the relationship between different
methods of seismic analysis and their
seismic responses
TIME HISTORY ANALYSIS:
A full time history will give the response of
a structure over time during and after the
application of a load. To find the full time
www.jespublication.com
Vol 9, Issue 1, 2018
ISSN NO: 0377-9254
history of a structure's response, you must
solve the structure's equation of motion. A
simple single degree of
freedom system (a mass, M, on
a spring of stiffness k, for example) has the
following equation of motion:
ABOUT E-TABS
ETABS is a sophisticated, yet easy to use,
special purpose analysis and design
program developed specifically for
building systems. E-TABS Version 9
features an intuitive and powerful graphical
interface coupled with unmatched
modeling, analytical, and design
procedures, all integrated using a common
database. Although quick and easy for
simple structures, ETABS can also handle
the largest and most complex building
models, including a wide range of
nonlinear behaviors, making it the tool of
choice for structural engineers in the
building industry.
HISTORY AND ADVANTAGES OF E-
TABS
Dating back more than 30 years to the
original development of TABS, the
predecessor of ETABS, it was clearly
recognized that buildings constituted a very
special class of structures. Early releases of
ETABS provided input, output and
numerical solution techniques that took into
consideration the characteristics unique to
building type structures, providing a tool
that offered significant savings in time and
Page No:9
Journal of Engineering Sciences Vol 9, Issue 1, 2018
ISSN NO: 0377-9254

increased accuracy over general purpose

programs.

ETABS STEP BY STEP PROCEDURE

Step-1

Open the ETABS Program

1) Open the ETABS program.
2) Check the units of the model in the drop-
down box in the lower right-hand corner
of the ETABS window, click drop-down Step 4
box to set units to kN-m
3) Click the File menu > New model
command.
4) Set the options according to IS codes
below figure shows the model
initialization

Step 5

Step 2

Model the required Building of moment

Resisting RC Frame by entering Grid data
and storey data as per Model to be generated
Step 6
Step 3
Run Analysis.
Once the data has been entered, save your
model and Run the Analysis

www.jespublication.com Page No:10

Journal of Engineering Sciences Vol 9, Issue 1, 2018
ISSN NO: 0377-9254

3D VIEW

To view results
 Firstly make sure that the , all the
frame members should pass and then
check the rebar% of beams and
columns as per IS: 456-2000
MAXIMUM STORY DISPLACEMENT

4 RESULTS & DISCUSSIONS

GENERAL
This chapter presents the results of Analysis
of RCC frame. Analysis of RCC frame
under the static loads has been performed
using E-TABS software. Subsequently these
results are compared and Analysed for Five
Storey Full Scale Reinforced concrete
Structure under static loads Loads‟. STORY DRIFTS

DISPLACEMENT
PLAN

www.jespublication.com Page No:11

Journal of Engineering Sciences Vol 9, Issue 1, 2018
ISSN NO: 0377-9254

STORY SHEAR ACCELERATION Y DIRECTION

PERIODIC FUNCTION X DIRECTION

STORY OVERTURNING MOMENT

PERIODIC FUNCTION Y DIRECTION

ACCELERATION X DIRECTION

www.jespublication.com Page No:12

Journal of Engineering Sciences Vol 9, Issue 1, 2018
ISSN NO: 0377-9254

www.jespublication.com Page No:13

Journal of Engineering Sciences
5. CONCLUSION:
In this paper the story displacement and
story drift is calculated. The story drift is
maximum at first floor and zero at base and
minimum at the top of the building. The
story drift slightly decrease with increase the
story height. And in case of story
displacement it is minimum at base and
maximum at the top floor. The story
displacement is increase with increase
number of story. In this paper the
displacement and acceleration graph is also
calculated at base, intermediate and top
floor. With increase the story height the
value of displacement and acceleration is
also increase and the graph between
displacement and time is also different at
base and 3rd floor and 10th floor. As Time
History is realistic method, used for seismic
analysis, it provides a better check to the
safety of structures analyzed and designed
by method specified by IS code. By Time
History analysis the base shear and story
displacement obtained during analysis is
comparatively lesser than Static earthquake
analysis. Due to this the steel required is
comparatively lesser than static earthquake
analysis
6. REFERENCES:
www.jespublication.com
Vol 9, Issue 1, 2018
ISSN NO: 0377-9254
1. Ahmad J. Durrani, S.T.Mau and Yi-
Li,(1994). “Earthquake Response of
Flat Slab Buildings, Journal of
Structural Engineering”, Vol. 120
2. Pradip S. Lande, Aniket B. Raut
(Journal of Civil Engineering and
Environment Technology Print
ISSN: 2349-8404; Online ISSN:
2349-879X; Volume 2, Number 10,
April-June, 2015 pp. 7-10) 4 critical.
3. Gupta U., Ratnaparkhe S., Gome,
P.,” Seismic behaviour of building
having flat slabs with Drops”,
International Journal of Emerging
Technology and Advanced
Engineering Volume 2, Issue 10,
October 2012.
4. Dhananjay D. Joshi, Dr. Pranesh B.
Murnal, performance of flat slab
structure using pushover analysis,
IOSR Journal of Mechanical and
Civil Engineering (IOSR-JMCE) e-
ISSN: 2278-1684, p-ISSN: 2320-
334X, Volume 8, Issue 3 (Sep.-
Oct.2013), PP 41-44.
5. Apostolska R. P., G. S. Necevska-
Cvetanovska , J. P. Cvetanovska and
N. Mircic (2008), Seismic
performance of flat-slab building
structural systems The 14th World
Conference on Earthquake
Engineering October 12-17, 2008,
Beijing, Chin
6. Makode R. K. , Akhtar S., Batham
G. (2014), Dynamic analysis of
multi-storey RCC building frame
With flat slab and grid slab, al Int.
Journal of Engineering Research and
Applications, Vol. 4, Issue 2(Version
1), February 2014, pp.416-420.
7. Salman I. Khan & Ashok R
Mundhada (2015), Comparative
study of seismic performance of
multistoried RCC Building With Flat
Slab & Grid Slab: A Review,
Page No:14
Journal of Engineering Sciences Vol 9, Issue 1, 2018
ISSN NO: 0377-9254

IJSCER, ISSN 2319- 6009, Vol.02- 15. Subhajit Sen and Yogendra Singh,
Feb 2015. “Seismic Performance of Flat Slab
8. Sable K. S., Ghodechor V. A., Buildings", Advances in Structural
Khandekar S. B. (2012),
Comparative Study of Seismic
Behaviour of multi-storey flat slab
and conventional reinforced concrete
framed structures, International
Journal of Computer Technology and
Electronics Engineering, Volume 2,
Issue 3, June 2012
9. Navyashree K, Sahana T. S
(2014),Use of flat slabs in multi-
storey commercial building situated
in high seismic zone, IJRET:
International Journal of Research in
Engineering and Technology,
Volume: 03 Issue: 08 | Aug-2014
10. Bothara S. D. ,Varghese V. (2012),
Dynamic analysis of special moment
resisting frame Building with flat
slab and grid slab, International
Journal of Engineering Research and
Applications Vol. 2, Issue 4, July-
August 2012, pp.275-280.
11. Mohamed A. A. El-shaer
(2013),Seismic Load Analysis of
different R.C. Slab Systems for Tall
Building Inpressco Vol.3, No.5
(2013).
12. S.S.Patil, Rupali Sigi, Analysis and
design of flat slabs Using Various
Codes, International Journal of
Researchin Engineering and
Technology eISSN:2319-1163 |
pISSN : 2321-7308.
13. Kim and Lee (Effective analysis of
flat slab structure subjected to lateral
loads, Engineering Structure, page
no. 251- 263.2005)
14. Ahmad J. Durrani S. T. Mau, Amr
Ahmed AbouHashish and Yi Li
“Earthquake Response Of Flat-slab
Buildings”, Journal of Structural
Engineering, Vol. 120, No. 3, March,
1994 Paper No. 5149.

www.jespublication.com Page No:15