Professional Documents
Culture Documents
SP 092 PDF
SP 092 PDF
SP 092 PDF
Experience of Fires
in Concrete Structures
by A. K. Tovey and R. N. Crook
l
2 Experience of Fires
R. N. Crook, at the time of writing the paper, was with the Cement
and Concrete Association, England. He is now Technical Advisory
Engineer for ARC Concrete Ltd, Conbloc Division. He is a member
of the Institution of Civil Engineers and obtained his PhD on fire
resistance of reinforced concrete from the University of Aston.
INTRODUCTION
RF~CORDING OF DATA
BUILDINGS EXAMINED
(1) most of the structures were repaired and many of those which
were not could have been but were demolished for reasons
other than the damage sustained;
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
REFERENCES
APPENDIX A
INITIAL QUESTIONNAIRE
Name
Firm
Address
Tel. No,
APPENDIX B
1. REFERENCE DATA
2. BUILDING DESCRIPTION
3. FIRE DETAILS
4. FIRE EFFECTS
6. REPAIR
7. GENERAL
APPENDIX C
Working Group A
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION ON
FIRES IN CONCRETE STRUCTURES
5 Information
not received *
Department Store In situ RC Spalling to soffit Yes - bonded mortar
one floor
APPENDIX C (continued)
Ref
Type of Building Type of Construction Damage Repaired ?
No.
28
47 Steel frame
APPENDIX C (continued)
Ref Type of Building Type of Construction Damage Repaired 1
No,
85 Information
not received *
86 Factory Yes
102 Information
not received *
103 School In situ, precast Expansion of steel Yes
prestressed beams bracing punched
through concrete
box sections
105 Information
not received
12 Experience of Fires
APPENDIX C (continued)
Ref
Type of Building Type of Construction Damage Repaired ?
No.
108 Information
not received *
109 School In situ walls Steel roof collapsed. Yes
Limited spatting
110 Information
not received *
APPENDIX C (continued)
C11 Flats In situ hollow pot Plaster spall Yes - replace broken
pots
Crack
: : : """:
"' /
1 I I 1
_·-1-- -l--LJ. l L//~
~
'---'
+
0'
••
Scpa<aUon
at fillet
Section
Bottom reinforcement
stopped off before suppon
15
16 Nuclear Power Plants
INTRODUCTION
Two types of fires which occurred during the construction of
Nuclear Power Plant (BWR and PWR) during 1983 and 1984 are descri-
bed in this paper.
The fires occuring in the BWR type Nuclear Power Plant (Fig.
1) corresponded to the ignition of the vertical formwork materials
between walls (Fig. 2), due to incandescent particles, coming from
welds or oxyacetylene cuts, falling on them. The fire was produced
in the junctions between buildings when the second wall which
forms the junction was being prepared for concreting, The fires
caused a local elevation of the temperature in the concrete of the
wall already built and in the reinforcement steel bars of the wall
that was going to be concreted. The aim of the analysis was to
ascertain if the materials of the affected areas were still suita-
ble from the engineering and design viewpoint or if they should be
demolished and replaced.
The fire which occurred in the PWR Nuclear Power Plant in
1983 affected the Electrical Building (Fig. 5), where the form-
works between the 7th and 8th floors burned. As a result of the
visual inspection, the analysis was aimed at determining the areas
to be demolished.
ANALYSIS OF THE BWR FIRES BETWEEN WALLS
The analysis of the fires which occurred between building
walls consisted in the following activities:
F-1 At 16 h 25m the fire was detected (Fig. 1) and use was made
of the powder fire extinguishers. At about 16 h 45 m water
hoses were used to extinguish the fire, which was accomplished
at 18 hours. The cause was attributed to the oxyacetylene
cutting of reinforcement steel.
F-2 Water was directed from the roof of the Auxiliary Building
(Fig. 1) at 21 h 49 m. Due to various impediments in the
water supply the fire was not extinguished until 23 h 40 m.
Water continued to be hosed until 2 o'clock the next morning.
The cause of this fire was not clearly identified, although
it was assumed due to welding operations.
Diaz-Llanos, Velasco, and Preysler 17
Visual Inspection
Visual inspection of the fires indicated the same conclusions
in both cases, although of greater dimensions in the second. ~lmg
of the concrete up to 15 mm deep was observed, cracks were not seen
Only superficial concrete spalling resulted in the most
affected areas. As the specified minimum protective covering of 40
mm had been reduced locally to still admissible values, the aim of
the analysis was to substantiate that the constructed work subject
to this incident still complies with the project requirements.
Drilled Sample Test
Table 1 summarizes the results of the drilled concrete and
reinforcement steel samples tested from the affected and unaffected
areas. Discrepancies in the strength properties of the materials
were not observed. The safety margins between the tested and
required materials strengths were sufficient after the two fires.
In Situ Tests
The results of in situ concrete tests with the sclerometer
are included in table 2 (SCHMIDT hammer, type N). A large number of
measurements were taken to suitably cover all the disturbed area.
The results confirmed a local superficial concrete spalling,because
the test results changed substantially with repeated hammer strikes.
In figure 3, the statistical correlation between sclerometer
readings and ultimate concrete strength is given. This study used a
sample of 290 concrete test cylinders, and each sclerometric measu-
rement is the average of six readings. The test specimens were 3, ~
28 and 45 days old.
The statistical interpretation indicates that for a minimum
sclerometric value of 32 corresponds to an average ultimate concrete
strength of 25 N/mm2 with a 90% level of confidence. The specified
concrete compressive strength was 25 N/rnm 2 •
The propagation speed measurements, done by PUNDIT device,are
summarized in table 2. The test samples which broke with ultimate
concrete strengths between 32.7 and 44 N/mm2 had a direct propaga-
tion speed between 3.48 and 3.86 Km/s. Comparing these results with
3.42 to 3.78 Km/s in situ propagation speed (Table 1) is a procedu-
re for qualifying the ultimate concrete strength in the fire
exposed structure.
Simulated Fire
Five reinforced concrete test samples were prepared to carry
out the bond test according to EH-80 (8). A brick wall was cons-
tructed with four of these test samples embedded, subjecting one
of the faces to a simulated fire equivalent to the one under study.
A thermocouple was placed to measure the temperatures reached at a
depth of 15 mm from the face exposed to the fire. The test sample
not subjected to the fire was used as a reference.
18 Nuclear Power Plants
LIST OF TABLES
1. Vertical construction joint fires. Summary on sample
test
2. Vertical construction joint fires. Summary on in situ
test
3. Bond test according to EH-80
LIST OF FIGURES
1. BWR Plot Plan zones affected by fires
2. Typical section between walls with forms
3. Correlation between ultimate concrete strength and
sclerometer measures in laboratory samples
4. Variation of relative propagation velocity with
temperature
5. PWR Plot Plan and zone affected by fire
6. "In situ" Bond Test
LIST OF REFERENCES
1. "Fabricaci6n y conservaci6n de probetas de hormig6n" UNE
7240, Instituto Nacional de Racionalizaci6n y Normaliza-
ci6n, Madrid, Spain, 1971. (Fabrication and Conservation
of Concrete Samples).
2. "Extracci6n y conservaci6n de probetas testigo de hormi-
g6n", UNE 7241, Instituto Nacional de Racionalizaci6n y
Normalizaci6n, Madrid, Spain, 1971. (Extraction and
Conservation of Concrete Samples).
3. "Ensayo de rotura por compresi6n de probetas de hormig6n','
UNE 7242, Instituto Nacional de Racionalizaci6n y Norma-
lizaci6n, Madrid, Spain, 1971. (Test for Ultimate Compr~
ssive Concrete Strength).
4. "Static Modulus of Elasticity and Poisson's Ratio of
Concrete in Compression", ASTM C-469, American Society
for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia, P a. , USA, 1965.
5. "Barras corrugadas para hornig6n armado", UNE 36088, Ins
tituto Nacional de Racionalizaci6n y Normalizaci6n, Ma=
drid, Spain, 1972. (Steel Quality for ReinforcementBars).
6. "Toma y preparaci6n probetas de acero", UNE 7282, Insti-
tuto Nacional de Racionalizaci6n y Normalizaci6n, Madrid,
Spain, 1972. (Extraction and Preparation of Steel Sarples).
7. "Deformed and Plain Billet-Steel Bars for Concrete
Reinforcement", ASTM A-615-76, American Society forTes-
ting and Materials, Philadelphia, Pa. USA, 1976.
8. "Instrucci6n EH-80 para el proyecto y la ejecuci6n de
obras de hormig6n en masa o armado", Comisi6n Permanente
del Hormig6n, MOPU, 1980. (Bond test).
Diaz-Llanos, Velasco, and Preysler 23
6
F-2
18
NON AFFECTED ZONES
-
n
('!)
~
'"'!
STD. DEVIATION 4. 56 9. 38 =
......
CJl
CONCRETE (I l
AFFECTED ZONES
NON AFFECTED
F- I F-2 ZONES
~
NUMBER 9
- -
~
Cfl
~
0
PROPAGATION MAXIMUM
- 3.78 - ~
VELOCITY ~
( Km/s)
MINIMUM - 3.42 - ::s
0....
MEt 'II
- 3.50 - ~
~
ctl
-
-
STD. DEVIATION 0.17
- '<
Cfl
I
ctl
~
P. PREPARED SURFACE
NP. NON PREPARED SURFACE
(I) HAMMER REBOUND 1:\J
CJ1
26 Nuclear Power Plants
TABLE 3
EH- 80 BOND TEST
BOND STRESS
TEST RESULTS
LEFT INDICATOR RIGHT INDICATOR
NON AFFECT ED BY FIRE
SAMPLE Ibm= 7. 79 N /mm2 Ibm= 9.03 N/mm2
D~
D FIRE F-1
TURBINE BLD.
FIRE
I
S?.
Qj
~
I
Dl
Qj
=
0
00
~
AUXILIARY BLO.
~
..........
):ll
00
C":l
0
~
):ll
=
0...
0 10 20 30 40 m. ~
'"<
00
..........
,..,
(b
1'-.:)
Fig. 1--BWR plot plan--affected zones by fires -l
28 Nuclear Power Plants
800 BOO
1 fTt 1
REBARS
·,'.J,I
. u.··.
··o-.J·
.\ .· .
." >o".':J
WOOD FORM
CONCRETE WALL
(ALREADY POURED l
WALL TO BE
CONCRETED
EXPANDED
POL YURETANE
PLASTIC SHEET
PANEL
DIMENSIONS IN mm . BOARD
40 /
/
/
G ,4;
C\1 G G i_l>"'
/
E
E
'z G (J /
/
J: c_, (, //
I- /
, /s
(,
C)
z
w 30
/
,·,
a:: \.•
I-
(/)
w /
/
1--
w
a:: /
u /
z / l:') /
0 /
0
/
u /
/ e
G
w /
G
/
I- LOWER 90% CONFIDENCE LIMIT
< 2
:::!!
1--
...J
:::l
I
>-
20 30 40
X- SCLEROMETER MEASURES
1,00
TEMPERATURE °C
BY LOGOTHETIS ( 12)
REACT01 SLOG.
_ __._~~~~~- - - - ----1---+-
TURBINE BLDG. 0
""
~
I
t:
~
:::::
c(fJ
AUXILIARY BLDG.
-
~
~
(fJ
~
0
~
~
AFFECTED :::::
ZONE
0 10 20 30 40 m. -
0...
--:'"'
(t
'<
g:_
(t
ELECTRICAL BLDGS. '"':
~
,__,
fJ 25 REBAR
...
I I THREADED SLEEVE
I
,
yr-
8
II
~
II
, II
HOLLOW JACK
~ II
I I
~ I I
~ II
II STEEL BEAM ( 2 lPN -140 SHAPE)
~
II
1:1
~
lf
I l> 150 mm. : I I I
I
I
'I
I I
I CONCRETE II VERTICAL
I WALL II SUPPORT
I
I FLEXIMETER
I
I
I I
II
I II
II
I il
II ,J
"
BOO
33
34 Young Concrete
INTRODUCTION
On March 24, 1959 a construction fire, fueled by straw
insulated wooden formwork and timber falsework, seriously
damaged the reinforced concrete arches and abutment of a highway
bridge that was being widened, Fig. 1 shows the scene on the
morning after.
The existing bridge carried a major freeway over the Bronte
Creek, some 40 km West of Toronto, Ontario, therefore the first
imperative was to determine if this 20 year old structure could
be reopened safely to traffic. Once this had been accomplished,
attention turned to investigating the extent and structural
significance of the damage with a view to remedial work.
Naturally, the young concrete in the new arch and abutment
which, depending on the location was only 6, 19 or 40 days old,
was of special concern.
The first surprise in the investigation was the lack of
published information on the effect of fire on young concrete.
A knowledge base had to be assembled from information on mature
concrete exposed to fires and fire tests and interpreted with
cons i derab 1e judgement. Next, investigative methods had to be
selected and used to probe the condition and properties of the
concrete and steel that remained, apparently intact, in order to
analyze what could be salvaged by restoration of the section or
which elements needed strengthening or replacing. Lastly,
specific remedial works had to be devised, specified and
executed which would ensure a durable structure with a long term
performance in no way inferior as a result of the fire.
All these steps are described in detail in a paper
presented at the time (1). The purpose of this paper is to
revisit the bridge to determine if the diagnosis made, and the
remedial work undertaken over 25 years ago have stood the test
of time. In light of this experience, advancements in knowledge
of the effects of elevated temperatures on materials, in investi-
gative techhiques and in repair methods are reviewed to see
whether any of the advancements would warrant a different course
of action if a fire of similar consequence occurred today.
Smith 35
REFERENCES
1. Smith, Peter, "New Concrete is Not for Burning - Investiga-
tion and Repair of Damage to Concrete Caused by Formwork and
Falsework Fire," Journal ACI, V. 60, No. 11, Nov. 1963,
pp. 1535-1566.
2. "The Assessment of Fire Damaged Concrete Structures and
Repair by Gunite," Technical Report No. 15, The Concrete Society
U.K., 1978.
3. Dore, E., "The Assessment of Fire Damage to Concrete
Structures," Concrete, Sept. 1984, pp. 49-51.
4. Smith, Peter, "Resistance to High Temperatures," STP 169B,
ASTM, 1978, pp. 388-419.
5. Abrams, Melvin S., "Performance of Concrete Structures
Exposed to Fire," Proceedings, "Materials and Processes - In
Service Performance," Ninth National SAMPE Technical Conference,
1977, Reprinted as Research and Development Bulletin 060.01D by
PCA.
6. Gustaferro, Armand, "Experiences from Evaluating Fire Damaged
Concrete Structure," SP 80, ACI, 1983, pp. 269-278.
7. Logothetis, L., and Economou, C., "Influence of High
Temperature on Calibration of Non Destructive Testing of
Concrete," RILEM Bulletin, Materials and Structures, Vol. 14,
No. 70, Jan.-Feb. 1981, pp. 39-43.
8. "In Situ/Nondestructive Testing of Concrete," {edited by
V.M. Malhotra), SP 82, ACI 1984.
9. Clifton, James, "Nondestructive Evaluation in Rehabilitation
and Preservation of Concrete and Masonry Materials," SP 85,
ACI 1985, pp. 19-29.
10. Harmathy, T.Z., "Determining the Temperative History of
Concrete Constructions Following Fire Exposure," Journal ACI,
Vol. 65, No. 11, Nov. 1968, pp. 959-964.
11. Smith, Leslie, and Placido, Francis, "Thermoluminescence: A
Comparison with the Residual Strength of Various Concretes,"
SP 80, ACI 1983, pp. 293-304
12. Suter, G.T., "Can Extremely Green Concrete Withstand Fire
with Minor Damage?," SP 80, ACI 1983, pp. 255-268.
13. Dougill, John W., "Material Dominated Aspects of Design for
Structural Fire Resistance of Concrete Structures," SP 80,
ACI 1983, pp. 151-176.
4·2 Young Concrete
I
Fig, 8-Condition of shotcrete repairs after 25 years exposure (1984)
SP 92-4
47
48 Assessment and Repair
IN'rRODUCTION
QUALITATIVE ASSESSMENT
This clearly shows that the main damage was sustained·in the upper
left-hand quarter of the first floor with the most notably
affected members in the area bounded by columns 5, 8, 19 and 22.
The degree of damage is again clearly shown to reduce away from
this area towards the lower right-hand corner (col. 59). This
corner was the position that the fire started but the major
combustible material was located to the rear of the building
adjoining a single-storey steel framed warehouse which was totally
destroyed. The fire can be seen to have spread to the second
floor but was brought under control before a major fire or
extensive damage had developed. A comprehensive report giving a
good indication of both damage and likely repair can be prepared
in only a few days using the simple visual assessment procedure.
At this stage, any surprising aspect in the performance of a
structure would also be noted.
QUANTITATIVE ASSESSMENT
beyond this depth to reach a zone which has not exceeded 1000C by
reference to Figure 7. The average damage factor may then be
determined for the compression block taking a factor of 1 .0 for
all concrete subjected to temperatures less than 1oooc, and a
factor of 0.85 for concrete within the 3000C to 100°C zone.
REPAIR TECHNIQUES
Resin Repairs
Cement Mortars
Plaster
Alternative Supports
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
REFERENCES
12. Holmes, M., Anchor, R.D., Cook, G.M.E., and Crook, R.N., The
effects of elevated temperature on the strength properties of
reinforcing and prestressing steels, The Structural Engineer,
Vol.60B, No.1, March 1982, pp.7-13.
15. Royles, R., Morley, P.D., and Khan, M.R., The behaviour
reinforced concrete at elevated temperatures with particular
reference to bond strength, Bond in Concrete : Proceedings of the
International Conference, Paisley, 14-16 June 1982, London,
Applied Science Publishers, 1982, pp.217-228.
18. Plecnik, J,M., Bresler, R., Chjan, H.M., Pham, M., and Choa,
J,, Epoxy repaired concrete walls under fire exposure, Proceedings
of the American Society of Civil Engineers, Structural Division,
Vol.108, No.ST8, August 1982, pp.1894-1908.
19. Plecnik, J,M., Bresler, B., Cunningham, J.D., and !ding, R.,
Temperature effects on epoxy adhesives, Proceedings of the
American Society of Civil Engineers, Structural Division, Vol.106,
No.ST1, January 1980, pp.99-113.
Floor
peeling
.. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. =
......
~
~
"'0
2 Column substantial
loss
..
pink
..
noticeable
..
localized
to corners
up to 257..
none buckled
none
..
none
..
=·
'"l
1-
z
w
>
w
NO
PRELIMINAFW
DESIGN FOf1
MAJOH
YES z
~
if)
w
D
NO
-'
<(
>
0
a:
Q_
Q.
<(
1-
0
<(
a:
1-
z
0
0
)
1
I 2
1 3
3
3 2
2
1 2 2
3
3
3 3
3
3 3
3
3
3 >
00
00
1 2 1 1 3 2 3 3 3 3 3 2
1L 2 3 1 3 3 3 3 ('l)
00
15
1
I 2
2
16
2
3-
3
17
2
1
1
18 2 3
2
19 3 3
3
20 3 3
3
21 2
3
3
-
00
a
('l)
2 3 1 1 3 3 2 2 :::::
3 3 1 2 2 3 .......
2 3 2 2 1 1 1 3 2 2 1
p;
3 1 2
3 3 1 2 1 2 :::::
3
a..
30 31 2 3 32 1 33 1 1 34 1 35 1 36 1
~
3 1 2 2 2
)
2 1 1 1 1 1 '
2 2/_ 3 1 2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1 '"i:l
2 2:.
L 1
1
2
1 1
1
1 1
1
1 1
1
1 1
1
1 0
0 ""
°
-
44 ot,5 1 46 1 47 1 1 48 1 1 49 1 1 50 1 1 51 0
. 1
)
0
E
4
Col
---r
'
'
.
I
Member Ref
~--f1·-P~-f~~-T-· ~-
' . ' ' .
3
•. . . . . . . . . . . . '·.· .· ......1
F\>:f.~:~i.,.:/t~<·;.-:J~->~->:k~- 43
~~-f-~?_ha__19_h9_h1~2___li;·.:·:.1~·~.··. :·.:;r~~\··/:l~6~··~~/~~-~j59
ELEVATION
• Pundit
0 BRE
I:B Windsor
x Schmidt
I I
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - _ _ _ __J ~
"L..r--------- ----,_J----- -------- -,__r----------- ---.,_,J
X 48 52' 48 X X 47
35 37 40 45 43 45 77 123 104 38
35 36 37 38 55 52 47 36
36 34 35 36 35 35
33 33 34
PLAN
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __r-,__ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ......r-,
----------------------------------------·r
!I
0·6
0·41-- REPORT 15
0·2
'"~
1·2
'::rt
Typical hot- rolled
O·B
0·6
\
\
\
\
REVISION ~"" ~.. _.,,..
\
0·4 \ REVISION
\
\
\
0·2 \ 0·2
Normal Pmk White grey ,Buff
Fig. 5--Compressive strength on cooling Fig. 6--Yield strength of steels at room temperature
after heating to an elevated temperature 0\
.......
CcJ T ..... ptnh.....iotribvtOooo;., • .,....... .,,_,..,, M ............
0"1
(a) Slabs exposeo ~o hea: oo one face liOO,--,-,---,---,-,,.-,--r-r-r-o-T,;-T-r-l ~
~··· :·.::~
eoo
( ) >
=
000
'.....
::· (fJ
(fJ
('!)
I (fJ
- I OC;
JOO
: :1
Joel
i\imtiLJ I l f"l =t'- 1--.....;,_ "'"'""'I == =r----i- --+==-:....___
1 ~~ ~
i i E
3('l)
:::;
,..-
,.
~
:::;
""""--- I I
c..
2oo! 1 ! ! f"'-- ~ \ ::=t-- --L: :=--r=--9 :zn~
\OQ I .::lVU :-:1m Ul"t uv:.K '>"YI;..;=:; Kl= I =+==-=+- -LJ ~
;:::::;
('l)
v
7~ 100
O•srane~ !rQ<II
1::0::.
~~oos~d T.oee o! si•C·"'"'
(OJ 'hm!'<'falur~ <lo"'robuhun on a d~n·~ concrorT~ rib<>' ~><'•m
=·
>-;
63
64 Nondestructive Testing
INTRODUCTION
The type of damage that often meets the eye after a structure is
exposed to fire is shown in Figures 1 and 2. Figure 1 shows a
large wall after exposure to a severe hydrocarbon fire. The con-
crete is highly discolored, spalling is extensive and deep, and
some of the steel is bent. Extensive spalling of concrete is
evident on the wall shown in Figure 2. Much of the horizontal
and vertical reinforcement is exposed, and some of the steel is
damaged.
For many years several techniques have been used to evaluate dama-
ge to concrete exposed to fire. lvhile valuable in certain res-
pects, most of these techniques are often costly and time consu-
ming. They are also limited in that they are more qualitative
rather than quantitative. They do not provide specific informa-
tion as to location, type, and degree of damage. Without such
information, it is impossible for even highly-trained structural
engineers to determine the effects of damage on structural capa-
city of the member or on the structural integrity of a building.
Consequently, the remedial work required to restore the building
to its original capability is inconclusive.
Visual Inspection
Auditory Methods
Core Sampling
21 (b)show that the delaminations were filled, and that the con-
crete lvas solid throughout the wall. Patterns shown in Figures
20 (b) and 21 (b) are identical to that shown in Figure 5 which is
typical for solid, undamaged material.
When damage due to fire does not extend down to the reinfor-
cing steel, it is necessary to determine the depth of undamaged
concrete cover remaining over the steel. This information is re-
quired to restore concrete cover thickness to original specifica-
tions. Magnetic and Microwave non-destructive testing techniques
are now available to obtain this information rapidly and accurate-
ly.
density material changes. For example, the reason that radar lo-
cates reinforcing steel is because there is an 80 percent change
in dialectric characteristics, 1~hereas radar will have difficul-
ties recognizing air-filled voids in concrete since the dialectric
change is minor.
SUMMARY
REFERENCES
'>, • j I
,f\,'
,.,
'
Fig. 1-Damage to concrete wall due to hydrocarbon fire
Muenow and Abrams 73
SKETCH A
(a ) ( b)
I
I OSCILLOSCOPE SIGNAL
I
I I
. ;·
. "::\ . . . ~·.A.;
., ) £'. .... .a 1 .. . .· . . . A • • . f,l . • .
IMPACTOR
CONCRETE SPECIMEN
SKETCH 8
REFLECTOR
¥
(a) (b)
OSCILLOSCOPE SIGNAL
,{:'" .
IMPACTOR
CONCRETE SPECIMEN 2
(I ,, ' ·~··
... ,
II. I
t- ,
J I
•:. I,
~liu
n,.....___
',.
...
.. ,. ..• ~
,~·.'.
r ~._,
·•.·.. ·..
"C1
(!)
:>
0
8
(!)
H
Ul
(lj
:.:
(!)
.w
(!)
H
u
~
0
u
'0
(!)
00
~
(lj
"C1
.c:
u
•rl
.c:
:.:
8
0
H
4-;
(lj
(!)
H
(lj
H
0
0
rl
~
~
I
rl
00
•rl
~
82 Nondestructive Testing
,I
Q)
-1-'
Q)
1-<
u
10:
0
u
'0
Q)
oo
<U
e<U
'0
4-<
0
1-<
Q)
:>.
<U
.--1
10:
•.-I
.
0
......
~
u
e
"'".
If)
N
4-<
0
.--i
<U
>
0
eQ)
~
0\
I
.--<
00
.
•rl
"'"'
Muenow and Abrams 85
For this purpose specimens were loaded with different stress le-
vels and heated up to maximum temperatures between 150 °C and
750 °C. After a holding period the specimens were cooled under
load.
87
88 Heating and Cooling
INTRODUCTION
TEST PROGRAMME
Testing Procedure
EXPERIMENTAL DETAILS
Specimens
Deformation Measurements
There are two measurement systems for the strains in the un-
stressed axes. One is similar to the measurement system for the
loaded axis. The other system is conducted according to a lateral
extensometer. The thermal strains of the transmitters, separately
determined by calibration tests, must be taken into considera-
tion.
Surface Cracks
Deformation Behaviour
Total Strains
'rhe total strains (diagrams b in Figures 6 - 9) were measured
during the experiments on the surfaces of the specimens. The
strains in all three disc axes were registered. Due to the symme-
trical form of the prisms, it was only necessary to measure in the
load direction (longitudinal strain) and in one of the perpendi-
cular directions (lateral strain).
94 Heating and Cooling
In the load direction the strain is much less than in the la-
teral directions. In comparison with the nonloaded specimen (Fig.
6), £ 1 is less and £ 3 is somewhat greater.
'!:~~~~-~~~~~
The diagrams "c" in Figures 7, 8 and 9 show the total creep
strains during the entire experimental cycle. The total creep of
concrete (linear in direction x, y, z or volrnnetric) in the time
interval (t - T1 ) (see Fig. 1) is defined as the time- and tempe-
rature dependent increase of the strains (in direction x,y,z or
volumetric) under the influence of a steady load. In order to
evaluate the total creep Ec i(t,T) in the time interval from
t = T1 to t < T2 the followlng equation was used:
CONCLUSIONS
HEFERENCES
/3/ Mindess, S.; Diamond, S.: The Cracking and Fracture of Mor-
tar. Materiaux et Constructions, Vol. 15 - No. 86, 1982.
/5/ Ehm, C.; Kordina, K.; Schneider, U.: The Behaviour of Con-
crete under Biaxial Conditions and High Temperatures. RILEM-
CEB-CNHS International Conference on Concrete under Multi-
axial Conditions. Toulouse, 1984.
0 X )(
• )( )(
20 )(
• )( )(
40 )( )(
• )(
60 )(
•
x prisms •discs
Component in kg/m 3
Cement PZ 35 F 260
Quartzitic sand 0 - 2 mm 923
Quartzitic gravel 2 - 8 mm 191
Quartzitic gravel 8 - 16 mm 768
Water 190
Fly ash 60
552
551
172
323 0
0 2.81
2.58
-
7.71
-
-
-- -
8.52
0.95
- 0.27
VI
e
479
488
330 20
325 20
2.40
2.18
6.63
6.18
-
- -- 6.49
6.13 -
-
1. 93
VI
·;: 533 185 40 1.86 - - - - - 0.81
---
0. 480 320 40 1.74 6.20 - 5.54 - 1.64
519
546
340 40
336 60
2.59
1.87
6.30
6.48
-- 5.60
7.81
- 1.91
o. 31
(600°C< Tmax < "'7so•c 2.49 6.53 11.44 20.35 17.42 15.77
mean value
Prisms , genera 11 y 6.68 1 )/17.42 2 ) -0.76 1 )/15.77 2 )
2.36 6.55 11.44 20.35
mean value
Concrete generally,
independent of 2.53 6.78 II. 92 20.35 6.29 1 )/17.42 2 ) -0.69 1 )/15.77 2 )
specimen form
(6oo •c < r s " 750 •c) mean value 65.8 9.0 25.2
Prisms, generally mean value 37.2 11.1 51.7
Concrete, generally (independent
of specimens geometric and 38.4 12.4 49.2
temperature)
t:l
Qi
>
~
en
en
-
Cll
'-
en
a.
"t, timet
1-
I
CII
'-
.a
~
Cll
Tmax --'--
I
I
--·---....
a.
-
E
Cll
I
timet
deformation transmitters
(unloaded axis I
/inductive displacement
transducer
prtncipal directions
2mm
(a) a 40 percent; Tmax = 600 C (b) a= 0 percent; Tmax
0
b) -;!!.
.!;
- - - - Ey
"'c: .......... Ez
·a'- - Ey=Ey+2•£z
.....
0 "'
:s
c) "'S2
I
)( 300
E
:J
"'
QJ
-s"'a.
d)
a) u BOO
0 Prism no.477
.G stress level a=0.2
Qj
:; 600
.....
0 ,_
Qj
a. 400
E
$
200
b) 0~
0
.b - - - - Ey
<II ......... Ez
c
·a - Ey= £y+2·tz
.1::
<II
0
:§
..·························...
.·..
······ .,...,---------,,
c) 0
---
~
0
.G
a.
0 .....................·····························
Qj
,_
Qj -2
u
0 -4
:§
d) "'
I
S2
e:::J"
Ill
Qj
.!!!
:::J
a.
e) j'
c
·e
.G
~,_
Qj
Ill
"5
a.
0
0 100 400 500 60
time in minutes
a) ~1000
Disc no. 465
.!:
~800
stress level ct= 0.2
~
~6
E
$!
b) 0~
0
- - - - - Ey
.!: - · - · - - Ex
Ill ••••••·••• Ez
c ---Ey:Ey•Ex•Ez
£Ill
:S
·~·'!'::'~::::':·~~:·:.-:=::-:::. . . . . . -.-.-. -::.:-::.:-:-:.~·.:-::: ~::-:-.:::-.: .
.s ---------------------
0
c) ';!.
.s
0.
u
~
..............
000000 0 00 •:-..:.:\•M.,.....-•U".•-~"'=:::: ;':'.::T:o":"'o~':": H"To"oftlo~: :r:o-:'0 ::~: ::0:: :"::.-:". 00 : : : ; : • ; ; : : • . : : : . : ' . ".:::'.: : : : . : - . :
._
............ _
~
d) "''52
X
E
iil
QJ
Ill
:;
0.
e)
.'~
,!;
15000·~~~==~==========~==~====~
time in minutes
a) \;' 1000
Disc no. 443
.!:
f! 800 stress level ct=0.6
:I
0
~ 600
E
$
1.00
0
b) '$. - - - - Ey
.!: -·-·-Ex
Ill
c: ............ Ez
"5
2 -·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·
------- ~~ ... ..... _
-10
---- ---------------------
........···"··..............................................................................
0
c) '$. 6
.!:
.f!
a. 4
2
:
-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·
u
:§ ···:.::::.:·:;;:< .....·
.s
-2 '', ......
-4 ''
' ... ... _
-6
-8
-------- ---------------
....I
d)
!:? 300
E
•
..
:I
Ill 200
~
:I
a. 100
0
e) I
c:
·e,!; 1
t.O
0~
Prism
.£
c Disc
·a
....Ill
L.
u
£Qj
E
::J
g
0
E
L.
Qj
:5
0~~~--~J_----L---~----~--~~--~----~~
0 t.OO 600 800
temperature in °C
..., 500
I
-
0
)(
---0.=0.0
E
:J
Ul
............. a.= 0.2
<II
Ul
-----a.= 0.4
3 -·-·-·-a.= 0.6
a.
.
.
I
;
I
I
temperature in °C
Fig. 11-Mean acoustic emission pulse sum during heating for prism
Ill
E
::J
Ill
1r tn tm 1rv time t
14 ~ hold ~4 ~
heating cooling
time
Possibilities of Assessing
the Temperatures Reached by Concrete
Building Elements During a Fire
by L. Krampf and A. Haksever
115
116 'lemperatures
INTRODUCTION
The present paper may serve to support the engineer who is forced
to decide if a reinforced or prestressed concrete structure being
affected by a fire can be reused, if need be after repair, or if
the building must be demolished.
Building Materials
Fig. 2.1 shows results won with samples subjected to the ISO 834
standard fire and extinguished immediately after the burners had
been switched off. The scatter of the results is considerable due
to the condition of the wood, knots, cracks, humidity etc. In ad-
dition, the side flanges normally are less affected than the bot-
tom side of a cross-section. Strictly speaking, the depth of
charring occuring during a standard fire is not equal to the d,pth
reached with the same temperatures occuring in a real fire.
A number of factors influences the process. But for the present
purpose it might be allowed to do some conclusions by fig. 2.1.
Due to the fact that during the cooling down period of a real
fire, the depth of charring will increase which has not been in-
118 Temperatures
The melting point of usual silicate glass is about 1000 °C and lo-
wer. With special fire protection glass the melting point increa-
ses. Numbers cannot be given here since the products are differ-
ing from each other.
Compared with fig. 3.2 the figure 3.3 provides the results for a
ventilation factor 0.6 using the else same boundary conditions as
in fig. 3.2. Obviously a ventilation increase causes lower hot
gas temperatures in the fire room as it is being evident in
fig. 3.3. This apperance can also be confirmed by means of theo-
retical investigations/18/.
Fire rooms from Lehrte had normal insulation on the walls. At··
mospherical influences contrary to Metz should and could not be
avoided during the tests.
Krampf and Haksever 125
Maximum temperatures
a) In the test from Metz with a fire load of 30 kg/m2 and p = 0.25
it is being evident that the exposed cross section of
200 mm x 200 mm was heated up to core even more than 300 °C,
whilst for p = 0.60 the penetration depth of the same isotherm
on the major axis of the cross section amounts to only 10 mm
(comp. figs. 4.1 and 4.2).
126 Temperatures
b) The comparison of the fire loads 30 and 60 kg/m2 from Metz for
a ventilation factor p = 0.25 shows that the increase of fire
1oads causes the heating of total cross section
area (200 x 200) more than 450 oc (comp. figs. 4.1 and 4.3).
DAMAGES, REUSEABILITY
Concrete
Steel
Since the mechanical stress working during the heating process can
influence the residual characteristics, considerable differences
from the courses given in figs. 5.2 and 5.3 may occur.
Bond
Prestressing
Chemical influences
REFERENCES
/1/ Abrams, M.S. und Cruz, C.R.: The Behaviour at high tempera-
ture of steel strand for prestressed concrete. Portland Ce-
ment Ass., Skokie, Ill., 1961.
/2/ Abrams, M.S. und Erlin, B.: Estimating post-fire strength
and exposure temperature of prestressing steel by a metallo-
graphic method. Portland Cement Ass., Skokie, Ill., 1967.
/3/ Arnault, P., et al.: Rapport Experimental sur les Essai s
avec des Feux Naturels executes dans la petite Installation.
/4/ anonym: Assessment of fire-damaged concrete structures and
repair by gunite. Concrete society, Techn. Report Nr. 15,
London, 1978.
/5/ Bechtold, R.: Tragverhalten von AuBenstUtzen unter Brandbe-
anspruchung. Bericht des Instituts fUr Baustoffe, Massivbau
und Brandschutz der Technischen Universitat Braunschweig,
1977.
/6/ Bechtold, R., Ehlert, K.P. und Wesche, J.: Brandversuche an
einem zum Abbruch bestimmten, viergeschossigen modernen Wohn-
haus in Lehrte. Bericht des Instituts fUr Baustoffe, Massiv-
bau und Brandschutz der Technischen Universitat Braunschweig,
1977.
/7/ Haksever, A.: StahlbetonstUtzen mit Rechteckquerschnitten
bei natUrlichen Branden. Institut fUr Baustoffe, Massivbau
und Brandschutz der Technischen Universitat Braunschweig,
Heft 52, 1982.
130 1emperatures
T[°C) a[mmJ
1200 120
100
~ 80
:J
0
~
a. £
~ 60 a.
<II
"0
~
Ol
.!;;
40 L..
L..
t 0
8. £
u
E
8 20
1.0
-
0.8
.....~- 0.6
"' 1\
"\
.,J'
1 0.4 \
~
Vi 0.2 1\
0
0 200 400 600 BOO T [oc)
critical steeltemperature
T [°C] a [mm]
1200
_. l-- >--
lOCO
rV
.... 800
C1J v ...
~.... I "E
C1J
0.
E 600
I
I /
v-- chip -board
v-- gypsum plaster- board 30
E
~
VI 25
15
~ at/ foz !JlC1J
E 400 c
20 -"'
t
8. I v 15 £
-~
E
8 200
1
/ I 10
~- 5
0
0 :l> 60 90 lal l!XJ 180 t {min]
standard fire duration
a[mm]
---
120
~ !OJ
v Ca(OH) 2 -H,O
ct-ll-quarlz·~
80
e /
C1J
0.
E I ,. /
x
_,-"
t
"0
~
-g
600 I temperature
f - - within /
3500<:
~
~ L{1J 7 ~- --- 40 0
8.
E
/ / ~~3oC
8 200 // / /
.~~
---
20
/ '// ,/
.,. 756oc ~~~~~wness
0
/h / /
0 30 60 90 120 150 180 t [min]
standard fire duration
rr
ignition phase
bumrg phase cootirg down phase
t
- - - fire duration
Fig. 3.1-Development of a real fire
---1------ _ A I A =p =0,25
ISO 834
~ 1000 ·················
..Y ······················
~
~
C1l
BOO
0.
E
2
i
~
600
60 kg/m 2
E
8
~ 400 --- 30 kg/ m2--
0
Q;
~
200 __ 15 kgL~-!--------!----
00 30 60 90 120 150
- - - - - - fire duration I min I
1100 t-------J----t---J-----+---+---j
7()()1-----
0 20 30 40 50
- - - - fire duration t [ min l
~
~ 600
.9!
15 30 45 60
fire duration I min J
Fig, 3.4-Temperature-time development in a compartment; Lehrte-tests;
fire load 30 kg wood/m2; ventilation factor 0.30
~
0
/1 speed ot Wind 110rying about
,~1 4m/sec from south - Past
I•
((/ II
1\
1\
,, .\
t! \.
Cl.'iling
I/:'
400
I
I
I half heoght .......
200
~·-·
ui
I
·-·-.":::.;.;::;;
30 60 90 120
fire duration I min J
Fig. 3.5-Temperature-time development in a compartment; Lehrte-tests;
fire load 30 kg wood/m2; ventilation factor 0.30
\I
0 I
spl.'ed of wond \Oryong about
~C1l
C1l
.... 800
/
·"
. /
-\
4 m/sec from west
r'
~ 600
i - I\
~ I
I I( \...--"
~ '<..bottom
'·
400
!
I '·-:::---- 1---
200
!
Tf
ceilong ' · - .
·- ................
30 60 90 135 180
fire duration I min J
Fig, 3,6-Temperature-time development in a compartment; Lehrte-tests;
fire load 90 kg wood/m2; ventilation factor 0.30
136 Temperatures
:EI200
... 1000
800
I~
\
f
'I/ /
I
r;,
/
I I
v
. . . . ·n
100------1-1
I
r----..
~ "" .\
----.::---\
~I\
\ I /
/
"' \
"
> ]00 ~ 0
t.OO
I I'.. .._
I 1---
Jl
\ '\ .:.; I
200 [\' I" v~~ ,.r- 0 6
0
1/
0 15 30 45 60 90
,\ "'' t'...: I'- v/~d' IJ
±>~~_:,p)
heat exposure I (min]
square section 200°
~
]00
IL
Iii w-
so•
tOO
-150
_,
''
H
IS •20
I
'
• I I I I I
~
-200 !'..
§~
- JOO
-400
- II v I'-.
75 500
1/
Ill/
t: ISO
1\
-
_TI
';: 8
.. ·-
0
"'!::
.,_
~
lw
ISO
-·zoo
JOO
-p.
-
It
T -section
300/500/160
70 0
100
I\
<00 ]QQ~
°
I/
]
I· II II 01~01 ••• I I l
Fig. 4.1-Maximum temperature occurring in different cross sections
exposed to a fire like: fire load 30 kg wood cribs/m2; ventilation
factor 0.60; high heat insulation of surrounding elements {Metz-tests)
Kramp£ and Haksever 137
, ..
...
000
I I I I t \ChlO
I
::-.:::
000 /:
'// v r-...,
" "'
I~
-·
400
7 \
t\
I
I
I
/
1/
1\
v
' \
I
""' 1\
I
1
TI
I \__ t-... \ I'-.
.f
...-'~' 17
/
...... ,\" '
J
v
11
.........
Jl
0 30 60
I---
90
---
~
°
//I/
_....__._,~
I
' - ,~
-f---t-+--"-+-+-+~>7•,• I I I I I I I
- ·100
150 I--
-~
'"" I/
I/
- ., ..
- "
II -~ 8
n
- I\
- 75 --
- 3=J ...
110 n•c-
100 - ,..
-~~~-r-
~ -
- - T- section 10
'
::1*" - lOO ))Q/500/160 square section J:X> 0
...
1300
I ZOO
_,--. t=H--t--+ ~ IQ I I I I
I \ /.
L .....100
' I· I I I I I ..!~;_,,~1+1-tl_,l~!+t
~
I
100 c;:.
~
f'lv
K
400
500
~
600 11 \'
700 .
\
I
l
~".#
~ .c:-- 150
1~~~
200 I'-..
~I\: t--...
r;:::
700
- 300
T- section
~00 1100
300/500/160 square section D:l 0
t~ "
< I I I 115-::nltJI I I I ~ I t
Fig. 4.3-Maximum temperature occurring in different cross sections
exposed to a fire like: fire load 60 kg wood cribs/m2; ventilation
factor 0.25; high heat insulation of surrounding elements (Metz-tests)
Krampf and Haksever 139
--~----200,-----41
~--+--+10•~ I J I I
I
n
0
0 30 60 90 135 180
[min]
heat exposure t
square section 200 °
I!-
1-1" J
'
•
I
+-<lf-+-1__._.,.,__._. 100--------+,
-+•••• ~. • • • • •
~ M- ISO r. ~
zoo v
we lOO
'00 ~ v ......
§tf -
1/ 1/
ll
110
1\
A- •o•
I./ 1/
li ~- - - I'-
- --
100 ' v
150 - f-1-=-l~ ~
~ - 700
T- section
!~ - 500
300 /500 /160 square section 300°
, ••• t I 11~10111
' I I 'I
Fig. 4 .4-Maximum temperature occurring in different ·Cross sections
when exposed to a fire like: fire load 60 kg wood cribs/m2; venti-
lation factor 0.30; high heat insulation of surrounding elements
(Metz-tests)
140 Temperatures
I ' t t I
t t I "'"
lDO
j
I ~,-,--,--,-,-~~.--,-,--,-,~~
?:
~ v '::;>-- ·--c-,:::: '~
If' \ llt~~~ -1-f-- r=:::f01\\
v
f
f- -\ - --
- . -1- /17 ""1\ \
·-- -~
b)'
1':
-~!!
,, ,_ -~ ~
-- --- - - -
- 1- t-- - -- - 1- - - -1 - - -
'- :::::.1 = I~ Fc100'C /
-
1\ J, / V;
--
!10
/
'- ,&, l-J \\~ ~ i-ldo- I-- ~ ' / 1/J
100 [\_~ != ~~~-
ooo-- 1=::: ~ r.:::: /
exposure 15 min 30 min
100
I 1L \\
I '"I 20~
If' v- \
(....-- 1------
~ -p....._ I-- r----:::
~
~·
.L t' .rl " """
TI
1-
1--- r---- -~/ 11
1/ L~<~' .1f.
----
" 1--
.:
/'~
,,<$
~>,; <J- ""'"- ~
I
\
{ /
\ \ 11-- 8- 1)~-
1- 1- -- ·--1.-
lp
rs \:: v
li
'1- -
/
\ ['-..'-- __.-' /
- I
~
1--
1--- v / 1\
·""
-
-
I/ D IJ.
'-- " !"-. ____, /
60 min
_) ::::: - ~<O'C-
llO
1-
----~
90 min
1.0
.c 0.8
OJ
c
<lJ
L.
1i) 0.6
0::J sudden
u cooling down
.iii
<II
L.
0.4
....0
.Q
0 0.2
L.
0 T[°C]
0 200 400 600 800
temperature reached before
!}) 0.8
!})
<lJ
.....
lil
0.6
~
<lJ
>.
0
::J
0.4
u
.iii
<lJ
L..
0 0.2
0
0
.....
0 T[°C)
0 200 LIJO 600 800
temp!:'rature rf:'ached before
Fig. 5.2-Residual yield strength after heating of cold-worked
reinforcing steel; exposure time to the maximum temperature 30
minutes
142 Temperatures
1.0
.!:
.,_. ~~
~ 0.8
4.>
.....
1il
~ 0.6
\\
8~ ~
Ill
c
4.>
.,_.
0 04
~
:J
'0
iii
4.>
.....
0 0.2
0
0 200 400
temperature reached be fore
0.8
(Jl
c
'iii
Ill
4.>
0.6
.....
iil
4.>
.....
Q_
0.4
'+-
0
0
.,_.
0
.....
Residual Properties
of Concrete Heated Rapidly
by K. D. Hertz
143
144 Hesidual Properties
K.D. Hertz for a decade has made research on fire exposed concrete
structures at the Institute of Building Design at the •reclmical
University of Denmark, and has simultaneously been active as con-
sulting engineer designing structures in Denmark, Greenland and
Saudi Arabia. He is a M.Sc. Ph.D. Struct. Eng.
INTRODUC'riON
This supplies us for the first time with information on the resid-
ual compressive strength of rapid heated concrete.
This paper describes the heating method and the test results and
possible new applications for the heating method.
DIELECTRIC HEATING
If the field oscillates the dipoles will tend to follow the oscil-
lations. But if the field oscillates sufficiently rapid, which is
approximately 1 GHz, the hindrance of the movement due to the mate-
rial structure will cause a considerable heat development.
Such materials are for example benzene, carbon, glass and porce-
lain.
Other materials such as water and many organic compounds are easily
heated by microwaves.
The walls of the cavity are all made of metal in order to reflect
the microwaves produced by one or several magnetrones, and a metal
stirrer can be used to disperse them and ensure a homogeneous power
distribution.
MICROWAVE TESTINGS
At the second heating the specimen was heated 20°C per minute at
1200 W until B00°c, and still the temperature distribution was al-
most uniform. ( I'igure 2) .
For the same reason the 14 days old concrete specimens were kept
for 3 days at 105°c before heating in the microwave oven.
The specimens were heated 10°C per minute two by two at 1200 W and
2.45 GHz the time necessary to achieve the maximum temperature
wanted.
From the test results it can be seen that the residual compressive
strength of rapid heated concrete decreases almost linearly as the
temperature increase.
The free water and from approximately 150°C the water of the hy-
drated calcium silicates evaporates, and consequently the hydrated
cement paste shrinks.
At the same time the aggregate expands, and at 300°c the stresses
between the aggregate and the matrix are so large that microcracks
develop through the matrix.
This is the main reason why the residual strength drops about 65
pet. from 400°c to 600°c for slow-heated specimens.
By heating at 10°C per minute it seems that the process does not
develop fully and the residual strength drops only about 35 pet.
from 400°c to 600°c.
The fact that the rapidly heated concrete has a lower residual
strength than the slowly heated at maximum temperatures from 200°c
to 400°c is often critical to the structural use of the test re-
sults. Large parts of the cross-sections of a concrete structure
reach maximum temperatures of this level by fire exposure, and the
parts achieving higher temperature levels will have strengths,
which are often negligible for calculation of the load-bearing ca-
pacity of the structure.
Hitherto the usual procedure has been to measure the heat loss of
a heated specimen during a slow coolinq in a calorimeter.
From these data the specific capacity of heat will be 1.03 kJ/kg°C.
Hertz 149
REFERENCES
[ 2) HERTZ, K.D.:
Microwave Heating for Fire Material •resting of Concrete
- A Theoretical Study.
Report No. 144.
Institute of Building Design,
Technical University of Denmark.
Lyngby 1981. 25 p.
CIB W14/81/3 (DK).
[ 3) HERTZ, K.D.:
Microwave Heating for fire Material 'l'esting of Concrete
- An Experimental Study.
Report No. 164 .
Institute of Building Design,
Technical University of Denmark.
Lyngby 1983. 38 p.
CIB W14/83/19 (DK).
[ 4) HERTZ, K.D.:
Analyses of Prestressed Concrete Structures Exposed to
Fire.
Report No. 174.
Institute of Building Design,
Technical University of Denmark.
Lyngby 1985. 154 p.
CIB W14/85/9 (DK)
Hertz 151
•c
600
400
200
0(
1000
600
600
400
200
10°( per min.
oc
~
1000
BOO
600
400
200
20°( per min.
10 20 30 40 SO 60 70 80 90 100 min.
_h_
fcc20
1.0
& - micn:1-1Klve heated
0.9
:---normal heated
0.8
0.7
0.6
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
153
154 Reinforced Columns
INTRODUCTION
CALCULATION PROCEDURE
Environment Temperatures
where
f = 0 (7)
r
where
TEST SPECIMENS*
tudinal reinforcing bars and 10-mm diameter ties were used. The
location of the main reinforcing bars, which were welded to steel
end plates, and the locations of the ties are shown in Fig. 7.
The yield stress of the main reinforcing bars was 444 HPa and
that of the ties was 427 Hl'a. The ultimate tensile strength was
730 HPa for the main bars and 671 HPa for the ties.
TgsT APPARATUS
Fire Tests
Ultrasonic Tests
Fire Tests
During the tests the heat input into the furnace was
controlled so that the average temperature followed as closely as
possible the standard temperature-time relations described earlier
in the present paper. The accuracy of control during both tests
was such that the duration of the average furnace temperature from
that given by the standard temperature-time relations was less than
10°C, except in the first 3-5 minutes of the test and after the
furnace had cooled down to below l00°C. Column A was exposed to
fire for one hour and Column B for two hours before the start of
the cooling period. Measurements were made of the furnace
temperatures during the fire exposure and cooling periods until the
average furnace temperature reached near ambient temperature.
Measurements were also made of the concrete temperatures at various
locations during the fire exposure and cooling periods. During
these periods the load was kept constant and the axial deformation
of the column was measured until the temperatures in the column
reached values close to ambient temperature. At that stage, which
was reached about one day after the cooling period started, the
load on the column was increased at a rate of 12.5 kN per minute
until the column failed.
Ultrasonic Tests
cylinders were fabricated at the time the columns were cast, and
then maintained at curing and storage conditions identical to those
of the columns. The pulse velocity measurements were made along
both the transverse and the longitudinal axis of the cylinders.
The cylinders were subsequently tested for compressive strength on
the day of the fire test.
Column Temperatures
The columns tested in the present study were made from the
same siliceous aggregate concrete. Using the same procedure and
thermal properties described in Reference 1, the temperature
history of the columns was calculated. There was again good
agreement between the calculated and the measured temperature
curves. Figures 11 and 12 present measured and calculated
temperatures of the concrete as a function of time for various
depths along the centerline of the column.
Average Compress:l,ve
Cylinder Pulse Velocity Strength
Column No, (m/s) (MPa)
A 1 4570 37.7
A 2 4600 39.0
A 3 4615 40.0
B 1 4665 42.1
of these factors does not introduce large errors. Thus the results
suggest that it is justified to consider the residual strength of a
concrete column that has been exposed to fire as principally
dependent on the maximum temperatures attained in the concrete.
CONCLUSIONS
REFERENCES
12. Weigler, H., and Fisher, R., Beton bei Temperaturen von 100 C
his 750 C, Beton Herstellung Verwendung, V. 18, No. 2, 1968.
u
0
"'::>
1-
600
""w
"'
Q.
:;: 400
w
1-
200
0
0 100 200 300 400
TIME, min
600
T • 20 o C
500
T • 200°C
ro
0..
400
:;:
T • 400°C
vl 300
w
"'..... T • 600°C
200
T • 800°C
100
600
500
"'
"- 400
::0
T • 400'C
vi 300
....
Vl
"'
.....
Vl
200
100
0.01 0.02 o. 03 0. 04 0. 05
STRAIN, Es
40
T • 20" C
30
"'
"-
::0
vi 20
....
V>
"'
.....
Vl
10
STRAIN,£c
40
Ll NE
..
"-
::;;
30
~ 20
....
Vl
,_
"'
Vl
10
0.03 o. 05
STRAIN, Ec
;!:
C)
z 0.9
ll;!
,_
Vl
..... 0.8
<(
z
C) o. 7
ii<
0
l5 0, 6
z
0
>= 0.5
(J
~ 0.4
,_
"'
C)
15 0. 3
"',_
Vl
0.2
~
e 0. I
....
Vl
"' 0
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800
TEMPERATURE, "C
48 mm COVER TO MAIN
EINFORCING BAR
]305 mm
533 x 533 x 25 mm
u
305 mm
TIIICK STEEL PLAIT-
I<Zfflt--ZZffZ"'_j 50 mm
I--
f--
E
E
f--
~
f-- E
E E
E
s I-- ~
~ >--
<(
V>
I-- "'
<(
CD
u•
f-- >--
~
f--
f--
f--
TRANSMITIING RECEIVING
TRANSDUCER
TRANSDUCER\- o.... .•. •
FROM ~~-c·.~.·->-'-'-----~~>---'----11'1
V-METER • ·; • , .
~~··.· ~: ...
152 mm
203
203
203
203
203
203
203
COLUMN CENTRHI NE
203
203 ISIICIINI~
I 2 3
203 10 mm
'""~f: w
E
E
ICI 5 5
-N
lEI 4 4 h•
I 2 3
FRONT IOOOR/ EASTI
ELEVATION PLAN
WEST
Dl RECTI ON TIIICKNESS OF
CONCRETE, mm
E -w 292
N-S 279
SE- NW 276
NE- SW 287
1-1 307
2- 2 286
3- 3 285
4-4 286
SE BAR- NE BAR 200
SW BAR - SE BAR 201
NW BAR- SW BAR 199
NE BAR - NW BAR 192
EAST
600
300
200
u
0
100
w
"'
:::>
,__.
<( 300
"'
w
"- 200 64 mm OEPTH
""
w
,__.
100
200
100
800
CA lCUlA TEO
600
MEASURED
400
200
u
0
600
w
"',__.:::> 400
<(
"'a..
w
200
""
w
,__
600
400
152 mm OEPTH
200
o~~~~-L~~~-L~-L~~~
........ .....
.... , AVERAGE CURVE
FOR MANY MIXES
''
''
''
e"' ''
'
>-
,_ ''
u
~
ANTIC I PAlEO
RANGE OF DATA
''
....
>
....
'
VI
.....
:::>
a.
5000
----
UNDAMAGED .,.
;
...... ... --- ~-
e"' ...... ;
/
>-.
,_
u
----
0
.....
....
>
....
VI
.....
:::>
a.
00 10 20 30 40 50 60
COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH, MPa
125r----~~--~--~----~---r--~r---,----,
~100-<>~.
~ 75 0
" ~~I DUAL STRENGTII
~ ~0 • •
u.
0
50
25 -
~o...._
MODUlUS 0 "·
...........0
~
-
----.....:0
OOL--~1~0~0--~2~0~0--~30~0--~40~0~~5~07
0--~6~0~0---7~0~0--~800
·-o
TEMPERATURE, °C
12
10 - - CAlCUlATED
E 8
E -----MEASURED
6
z" 4
0
....
0
""
::;:
-2 ',,
"'a ... , .... ____________ ,
-4
....
u.
c -6
.... -8
I
I
""
X
-10
-12
I
I
"" -14
-16
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600
TIME, ml n
o~--1.~~----~~~------------1
-2
l
I
E -4 I
E I
-6 I
I
z I
0 \
1-- \
<( \
:;;: \
\
""
0 \
U-
~ -18 -
' ',
-' -20 '
'' ........ ,,
<(
X
<(
-22
-24
......... _______ ,
-26 I
I
-28 --CALCULATED I
I
-30 -----MEASURED I
-32 I
-34
-36L-~--~~~-L--~~---L--~~
0 2 00 4 00
TIME, min
120
,_
:I:
(!)
z
.....
<>:
,_
V>
.....
<(
z
(!)
""
0
..._
0
.....
(!)
,_
<(
z
.....
u
"".....
B.
:.:
,_
(!)
z
.....
,_
""
V>
0
0 4 10 II 12
TIME, months
175
176 Strain Measurements
IN'I'UODUCTION
APPARATUS
t-1ain Tests
a EAT
K ••••••••• ( 2)
80(1-V) 2 ( 1- V)
CONCLUSIONS
Structural Effects:
Thermal strains representing underlying "material"
behaviour were measured uncomplicated by "structural"
effects by employing a relatively slow rate of heatinq
(<1°C/minute) and small specimen diameter (60mm) which
minimized radial temperature gradients and thermal
stresses during thermal transients.
Conditions Within Specimen:
Two peaks in the maximum radial temperature difference
(AT) occur at about 160°C and 550°C during heating at
l°C/minute due to moisture loss and dissociation of
Ca(OH)2. The tensile thermal stresses that develop in
the specimen centre during heating are proportional to
AT. ~1oisture loss increases sharply above 100°C to
reach a maximum at about l35-200°C depending on the
heating rate. ·
186 Strain Measurements
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
REFERENCES
fumace
~ heating
zones
~
specimen
-<-
\fJ
•nv•r conneeting rods
:::::
micrometer
e
¥
~
::s
~
transducer
dead weights
=
0....
~
::=-'
0
'- :::::
'"I
'-<
28
24
~ 20
1 16
~ 12
,..-,,
8
4 ~ .,..... .......... "' -----
gravel -
1
0 100 200 300 400
SURFACE TEMPERATURE-•C
2 N
a
.....,0
~ a
~ ClJ
f<
".,ClJ
.,
0
-1
~
...
s:
f<
ClJ
I<
.,
liClJ"'
+a
.....,0
..
ClJ
I<
§
u
7
~
I:
QJ 1.5
u 6
H
5
2!.
Ill 4 1.0
Ill
\-z-
0
..1 3
~
.<! 2
...__ __ o.5
....QJ
"
)
....QJ ..,0
~ 1
QJ
~
0 0
0 100 200 300 400 500 "'
P:
Temperature- 0 c
.."
H ..." - OPC/PFA PP2
I
6000
b."
I CPl
...."
0 4000 -OPC BI
" ...."
0 GI
LI
! 2000 H
u
.." - SRC/Cemsava Ion
CPJ
"
0
0
-50000
Temper11ture - 0c
::s
....,= 0
......
Ill
~
$lj
riJ
.:::
""!
~
3~
..... ::s
......
f\~ ~ \\~.,.
-sooot- riJ
Basalt II
......51 t eon:::-et~
tl
...fl -1000
u
= D
-1500
10000~----------------~------~
,
t
r
I
.i Ir
~ sooo / I
I I .BII
''b
...
...,
I(
1:: Ll
..
b
Temperature - 0 c
...,
1::
0
....u
~
....
1::
E -4000~------------------------~
-2000
g
s·
..·f.. ,£""
~I -Jooo a=
...
000
IJC
CJ)
!);J
w
IC
"·J.. no. of curvel .s,., -4000
=
.....c included ....... ~
CJ)
...... 3CJ)
:1 .. . '(6-11) -, -5000
c
....
0 BI ::s
.......
0'
::Iu
.,
......c
-60
E• standard
.l.t:. .
~
t,.,
......c
81
-6000
-7000
w
... .
0 deviation
u
""(10-11) -8000
.
-9000
:t lE'':
Fig. 10--Load Induced Thermal
.. Strains of 5 concretes during
"'(eJ first heating at 1 C/minute
under 10 percent compressive
Fig. 9--Master Load Induced Thermal load
Strain (LITS) curves representing
5 different concretes each con-
taining 67 percent aggregate by
volume, during heating at 1 C/minute
under 3 load levels
100 200 300 00 . _100 _200
I
-1000
(a)
-1000
\0
0
~
-2000
)( \0
~
... -''''[ •«•••
0
c ~
-8000
concrete
-
:::::
..,<-·
..,::s
::s
Fig. 11--Strains during cooling from 600 C under four load 0..
levels of thermally (a) stable and (b) unstable concrete ~
::s"'
0
:::::
~
'-<
1-'
\0
C,Jl
196 Strain Measurements
Chloride Absorption
from Concrete Surfaces
by A. Lammke
197
198 Chloride Absorption
1. Introduction
The concrete beams were treated 5 times with lime paste on one
half of their surface, then cut with a stone saw into blocks and
slices. The slices from the treated and untreated halves were
analysed. The results are given in table 4 and in the graphs 4,
5 and 6.
3. Theoretical aspects
k . cn
c equilibrium concentration
of absorbed material in solution
C = a - x
a start concentration
of absorbed material
4. Conclusions
5. Bibliography
[1] Richartz, W.
Die Bindung von Chlorid bei der Zementhartung
Zement - Kalk - Gips, 22, 10, S. 447-456 (1969)
(2] Ruffert, G.
Betonschaden durch PVC-Brande und ihre Sanierung
Deutsche Bauzeitung, 5. S. 70-71 (1980)
(4] Kupfer, H.
Entfernung von Chlorid aus Beton durch Elektroosmose
Forschungsvorhaben B I 5- 80 01 81 - 1/330-20
Deutscher AusschuB fur Stahlbeton 1980
[6] Bernhardt, H.
Eindringverhalten von Chlorwasserstoff bzw.
Calciumchlorid in Leichtbeton
schaden prisma, 11, 3, S. 33-37 (1982)
[10] Freundlich, H.
Kapillarchemie, Bd. 1 und 2
(Leipzig 1930, 1932)
Table 1
Chloride distribution in test specimens
Specimen
1 % 2 % 4 %
% NaCl by weight of cement
Table 2
Chloride distribution in test specimens
after 5 lime paste treatments
Specimen
% NaCl by weight of cement
1 %
I 2 %
I 4 %
Table 3
Loss of chloride in treated concrete ./.
total absorption of chloride in used lime
specimen
1,3147 0,0352
1 % NaCl
specimen
1,8009 0,1077
2 % NaCl
specimen
3,9241 0,1069
4 % NaCl
Table 4
Chloride distribution of the total concrete cross section
before and after lime treatment [% Cl] by weight of concrete
Table 5
Chemical and mineral composition of cements
Minerals calcu-
lated according
to Boque
c 3A 3,3 10,6 -
c 4 AF 12,8 1,8 15,1
C 2F - - 1,3
206 Chloride Absorption
~
Q u f:
QJ E
--·--!Y-
0 u
z
~
QJ
~-
00 .r:.
---~- ~
"' ....
QJ QJ 0.
c
OJ
c::> E
·..:: u
QJ
~I
I
I ~
I
/\
/
v --~
\
\
'{:
~ ''
~ ''
u
c '
~
0
"'
I .r:.
0.
u
0 ~
sd g
o'
12
d
Ol
~
Q u ·r, E
QJ
I E
z0 uQJ 0
~ I
~ 0 -l ~
.c
~ ~ QJ I a.
c
QJ :J
§ c I u
QJ
E I I
u -1 ~
QJ
lI
/J-,-· -
0.
I
"'
-- 'C
I \
\ ,_,,. \'!
\
\
\
\
f------L
.r:.
I 0.
u 0 ~
sd g
d
12
d
0 Ol
Lammke 207
0
$!,......
u0 I E
z u
Ql
-- I o
(11
E
.....
•u-
:: ~o -~ ~ .c
c "' - o-
c "'E
~ ~
"' ij}
u
~~~ ....
0
VI I I
(J
"I
0
.....
~
,, ,..,
0
!':"' /
u
-- (
I
u
5
...... /' ...... , .c
u a.
;;--0 - ·0
,..,o e
0"1
N
o· "'d 0
;;· g.
~
iJ I E
u I E
~ u
...,~ 2"' ~
lC£
c ~
.l= a.
f
\
"' c .§"'
E
\ u "'
::J \
u I
"'a.
"' I I
I
I
I
I
.... ....
/ .... ....
' ....
.... ....
~
!':
u
c
0
u
I ....
.... ....
....
u
g 9
d d
208 Chloride Absorption
% Cl /concrele
0,25
Spt'C lm~:>n ?'1, NoCI
-unlreol~:>d
---lime lrrol~:>d
0,15
1\ \ ''
I
" .... /
""
I ....__ /
I
I
~ fv ~ ~ --:: -J
I
I
0. 10
I
Q08
0 10 20 30 '0 so 60 70 80 90 100
deplh (mm)
graph 5
% Cl /conuele
0,)}
spec•mE>n l'/.NoCI
\ .,..- ........
'
- unlrE>OIE>d
--- limE> lr~:>oiE>d
~
I
"' /
'I
0 .•.
I
I
I
I
I
\
I'-- ~
' '-
~
'" 'v
../
v
I
Q2
I
I
I
I
I
I
0, IS
I
I
Q13
0 10 20 30 '0 so 70 80 90 100
graph 6 deplh (mm)
Lammke 209
0
E .'!
E m
5.0 · I - ---~--~--,..----,--·--,---,---.----.----,
~ (.0 1 - - - - - - - - - ·
-~ p
£ lO -·-·- - · ·· - - - - - - - 1 - - - - - 1 - ~-;..-_...,T---1
c
6 ~.0 ----- --· .. - - --~~ - - 1 - ---11---i
v--v--
~ v--
l-g Lv_·.- ·-~.-~=~" " '; !-·~·:::d:-==±::::::::~~:~'l==f==:f==:L-
"'
1.0
0
0
.....
10 .70 50 60 10 eo 90 100
concenlrol10n C I mmol I
0.4
c
"'
E
"'u 0.3.
0
.I:
~
"'3: 0.2
>-
.D
"'
"0
0,1
()
:cu
"0
c
::>
0
.D 0
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
lime of reaction I days I
por !land cement
norma I 35 F o--a
high alumino '<"---<>
low alumino o---o
--
hydro led
graph 8