Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Civil Procedure and Practice by Solicitor Katura
Civil Procedure and Practice by Solicitor Katura
Civil Procedure and Practice by Solicitor Katura
By Solicitor Katura
CIVIL CLAIM
A lawsuit brought to redress a private wrong such as breach of contract, encroachment, or
negligence; or to enforce civil remedies such as compensation, damages, injunction. Also called
civil action, civil proceedings, or civil suit.
CIVIL PROCEDURE
This is a procedure of litigation before the Courts in civil matters. It does not give any litigant a
right but it enacts a procedure through which a right can be obtained.
RELEVANT CASE
J. B. SHIRIMA & OTHERS v. HUMPHREY MEENA (1992) TLR 290 (HC)
It was stated that “A relief is not a cause of action, where the plaint does not disclose a cause of
action the Court has two alternatives; to order amendment of the plaint, or to strike out the plaint.”
Plaint struck out.
B. JURISDICTION
Civil Procedure and Practice ;
By Solicitor Katura
This is the official power of the Court to make legal decisions and judgements.
CATEGORIES OF JURISDICTION
2. PECUNIARY JURISDICTION - This is the power of the court to entertain a claim basing
on its monetary claim. Black's Law Dictionary 3 traces the origin of the term pecuniary
from a Latin word “pecunia” which means money or real or personal property and the term
pecuniary is defined as relating to monetary.
Relevant case
ABDU HASSAN v. MOHAMED AHMED (1989) TLR 181 (HC)
It was Held that;- The trial magistrate lacked pecuniary jurisdiction to entertain the matter
and the proceedings are a nullity.
Order accordingly.
RELEVANT CASE
RICHARD NDAHALAWE V. TANZANIA HARBOURS AUTHORITY . CIVIL
CASE NO. 422 OF 2002 (HC).
It was Held that:- " It is clear to us that trade disputes have to follow the prescribed
procedure and there is no room for going to the High Court straight. The High Court has no
original jurisdiction to entertain trade disputes. Such matters are dealt with in accordance
with the Act." Accordingly, this court has no original jurisdiction to entertain the suit. It is
incompetently before the court. I therefore uphold the alternative objection by defendants
and the suit is struck out with costs.
2. APPELLATE JURISDICTION – This is the power of the court to hear the matter on
appeal. It means the matter has already been heard by the lower Court. E.g. Appeal from
District/R. Magistrate Court to the High Court. [SS. 20, 25 of MCA, 1984].
RELEVANT CASES
HALAIS PRO-CHEMIE v WELLA A.G. (1996) TLR 269 (CA)
It was Held that: The Court could, on its own motion and at any time, invoke its revisional
jurisdiction in respect of proceedings in the High Court; Except under exceptional
circumstances, a party to proceedings in the High Court could not invoke the revisional
jurisdiction of the Court as an alternative to the appellate jurisdiction of the Court;
3. CONCURRENT JURISDICTION: This is the power which is given to more than one
Court over the matter. E.g. Divorce petition can either be filed in Primary Court, D.C, RMC
or H. Court; S. 66 of the Law of Marriage Act, 1971, S.63 of MCA, 1984 {Contra, S. 13
of The CPC}.
Civil Procedure and Practice ;
By Solicitor Katura
RELEVANT CASE
NATIONAL BANK OF COMMERCE v STAR TRANSPORT CO LTD (19970 TLR
293 (CA)
It was Held that; The Court of Appeal and the High Court had concurrent jurisdiction in
the present matter. The applicant had rightly made application to the High Court before
coming to the Court of Appeal as under Rule 44, where the Courts had concurrent
jurisdiction, first application should be made to the High Court;
RELEVANT CASES
SEIF SHARIF HAMAD v. S.M.Z (1992) TLR 43 (CA)
It was Held that: Our appellate jurisdiction derives from the Appellate Jurisdiction Act,
1979. Section 6 deals with criminal appeals like this one. Section 6(2) expressly permits
only the D.P.P. to appeal against any order of the High Court or subordinate court in the
exercise of extended jurisdiction;
RELEVANT CASES
MOSES J MWAKIBETE v THE EDITOR - UHURU, SHIRIKA LA MAGAZETI YA
CHAMA AND NATIONAL PRINTING CO LTD (1995) TLR 134 (CA)
It was Held that:- The Court of Appeal can be moved to use its revisional jurisdiction
under s 2(3) of the Appellate Jurisdiction Act 1979 only where there is no right of appeal, or
where the right of appeal is there but has been blocked by judicial process, and lastly, where
the right of appeal existed but was not taken, good and sufficient reasons are given for not
having lodged an appeal;
Civil Procedure and Practice ;
By Solicitor Katura
The applicant in this case had a right to appeal and has not given any good and sufficient
reasons why he did not appeal; therefore he cannot move the Court of Appeal to exercise its
revisional jurisdiction.
6. JUDICIAL REVIEW JURISDICTION: The power of the High Court to determine the
legality of the decision of administrative tribunals or actions of administrator/s.
RELEVANT CASES
ALHAJI A J MUNGULA v BARAZA KUU LA WAISLAM WA TANZANIA (1997)
TLR 50 (HC)
It was stated that; Judicial review would be confined (restricted) to the decisions of
BAKWATA which pertained to the performance of a legal function: its decision on matters
in respect of the domestic relationship between it and its officers would not be subject to
review. Application refused.
C: LIMITATION:
This is divided into two:-
a – LIMITATION OF TIME – This is loss of legal right because of passage of time. Limitation of
time is divided into two:-
1. Limitation of time involves a matter which is not yet in the Court. In this situation the
Court doors are closed until he/she applies for extension of time to the Minister responsible
for legal affairs.
As under the Law of Limitation Act Cap 89 (2002) Section 44.-(1) Where the Minister is
of the opinion that in view of the circumstances in any case, it is just and equitable so to do,
Civil Procedure and Practice ;
By Solicitor Katura
he may, after consultation with the Attorney-General, by order under his hand, extend the
period of limitation in respect of any suit by a period not exceeding one-half of the period of
limitation prescribed by this Act for such suit.
2. Limitation of time involves a matter which is already in the Court. He/she must apply
for extension of time to the Court.
As under the Law of Limitation Act Cap 89 (2002) Section 14.-(1) Notwithstanding the
provisions of this Act, the court may, for any reasonable or sufficient cause, extend the
period of limitation for the institution of an appeal or an application, other than an
application for the execution of a decree, and an application for such extension may be
made either before or after the expiry of the period of limitation prescribed for such appeal
or application.
b – ESTOPPEL – This is a Doctrine which prevents one from denying facts or rights due to his
or her actions, conduct, statements, admissions, failure to act or judgment against in an identical
legal case. OR This is a doctrine of promissory which prevents one party from withdrawing a
promise made to a second party if the latter has reasonably relied on that promise.
This is divided into two:-
1. Res subjudice - in Latin means “Under Judgement”. It denotes that a matter or case is
being considered by Court or Judge. When two or more cases are filed between the same
parties on the same subject matter, in two or more different Courts, the competent court has
power to “Stay Proceedings” of another Court.
As under Civil Procedure Code Cap 33 Section 8. No court shall proceed with the trial of
any suit in which the matter in issue is also directly and substantially in issue in a
previously instituted suit between the same parties, or between parties under whom they or
any of them claim litigating under the same title where such suit is pending in the same or
any other court in Tanzania having jurisdiction to grant the relief claimed.
2. Res judicata – In Latin term for "a matter [already] judged" by a competent court and
therefore may not be pursued further by the same parties, and refers to either of two
Civil Procedure and Practice ;
By Solicitor Katura
concepts: in both civil law and common law legal systems, a case in which there has been a
final judgment and is no longer subject to appeal.
As under Civil Procedure Code Cap 33 Section 9 “No court shall try any suit or issue in
which the matter directly and substantially in issue has been directly and substantially in
issue in a former suit between the same parties or between parties under whom they or any
of them claim litigating under the same title in a court competent to try such subsequent suit
or the suit in which such issue has been subsequently raised and has been heard and
finally decided by such court.”
Judgement by consent;-
If judgement ends by consent the judgement will be on merit and it operate Res judicata. If a matter
had experte it will be deemed to have been had and finally decided on merit and sufficient for res
judicata.
RELEVANT CASE
MARATO MATIKU V. WANKYO SANAWA (1987) TLR 150 (HC)
It was Held that: Where grounds relied in the later petition are the same as those dismissed
previously, then the petition is res judicata.
Appeal dismissed.
VILLAGE CHAIRMAN - K.C.U. MATEKA v ANTHONY HYERA (1988) TLR 188 (HC)
It was Held that: one of the conditions for successful invocation of the plea of res judicata is that
the parties in the previous suit must be the same as in the subsequent suit. In Kigonsera Primary
Court civil case No. 59 of 1983 and Mbinga District Court Civil No. 81 of 1983 the parties were
Antony Hyera and Osmund Ndunguru. The appellant as chairman was not a party to these
proceedings. The plea is therefore not maintanable in law.
Appeal dismissed.
A: REPRESENTATIVE SUIT
This is a legal action in which one or a few members of a class sue on behalf of themselves and
other members of the same class.
As according to Civil Procedure Code Cap 33, Order 1 Rule 8(1) “Where there are numerous
Civil Procedure and Practice ;
By Solicitor Katura
person having the same interest in one suit, one or more of such persons may, with the permission
of the court, sue or be sued, or may defend, in such suit, on behalf of or for the benefit of all
persons so interested; but the court shall in such case give, at the plaintiff's expense, notice of the
institution of the suit to all such persons either by personal service or, where from the number of
persons or any other cause such service is not reasonably practicable, by public advertisement, as
the court in each case may direct.”
Relevant Case:-
LUJUNA SHUBI BALLONZI V. CHAMA CHA MAPINDUZI (1996) TLR 203 (HC)
It was Held that:- Although the plaint does not expressly say so, it is plain that the plaintiff has
purported to file the suit on behalf of himself and also on behalf of all Tanzanians who are not
members of the ruling party; but as the suit has been filed without adopting the procedure laid down
in Order I Rule 8 of the Civil Procedure Code, for instituting representative suits, it is
incompetent in law.
MUSSA HAMISI SHAH & TWO OTHERS V. DAR ES SALAAM CITY COUNCIL (1996)
TLR 201 (HC)
It was Held that: The law allows representative suits, but any application for leave to bring a suit
in this way should be entertained by the court that will hear the suit in due course. It would be
premature for this Court to grant the injunction sought before the main suit has been filed. Leave is
granted to the Applicants to file the main suit, and the application succeeds to this extent only.
B: SUMMARY SUIT
Civil Procedure and Practice ;
By Solicitor Katura
Outline:-
1. Application of Order. O.XXXV R.1
2. Institution of summary suits. O.XXXV, R.2
3. Defendant showing defence on merits to have leave to appear. O.XXXV, R.3
4. Power to set aside decree. O.XXXV, R.8
5. Power to order bill, etc., to be deposited with officer of court. O.XXXV, R.9
6. Recovery of cost of noting non-acceptance of dishonoured bill or note. O.XXXV, R.10
7. Procedure in suits. O.XXXV, R.11
A summary suit is instituted by presenting a plaint in the court of law containing the following
specification ;-
1. That, it must mention that the suit is filed under 'summary procedure'
2. And below the title of the suit it should be written 'Made under Order XXXV of Civil
Procedure Code, Cap 33'.
A. APPLICATION OF ORDER
(O.XXXV R.1-This Order shall apply to-
1. Suits upon Bills of exchange (including cheques)
2. Suits for the recovery of income tax.
3. Suits arising out of mortgage.
4. Suits by the Tanzania Electric Supply Company Limited for the recovery of meter rents,
charges for the supply of electricity and other charges (including any tax) connected with.
5. Suits for the recovery of rent, interest or other debts due to the Republic, the Government or
any local government authority.
6. Suits for the recovery of possession of any immovable property including any building or
other premises where the right of the person seeking to recover such possession is not
restricted by the provisions of the Rent Restriction Act.
7. suits for the recovery of possession of any immovable property from a lesse, under such
agreement the lessee has no right of ownership over the property leased to him.
F: RECOVERY OF COST
O.XXXV, R.10 The holder of every dishonoured bill of exchange or promissory note shall have the
same remedies for the recovery of the expenses incurred in noting the same for non-acceptance or
non-payment, or otherwise, by reason of such dishonour, as he has under this Order for the recovery
of the amount of such bill or note.
G: PROCEDURE IN SUITS.
O.XXXV, R.11. Save as provided by this Order, the procedure in suits under this order shall be the
same as the procedure in suits instituted in the ordinary manner.
scopes of Disputes
Ownership of Land
Trespass to Land
Housing Disputes
e.g: rent & eviction
Certain form of recoveries in mortgages and third party claims.
Composition of Village Land Council (s.5(1) of the Land Disputes Courts Act Cap 216).
The Council shall be composed of Seven members of whom three shall be Women and all must be
approved by the Village Assembly.
Functions of the Village Land Council (s.7 of the Land Disputes Courts Act Cap 216).
1. Receiving complaints from parties in respect of land;
2. Convening meetings for the hearing of disputes from parties; and
3. Mediating between and assist parties to arrive at a mutually acceptable settlement of the
disputes on any matter concerning land within its area of jurisdiction.
Where the parties are not satisfied with the decision (s.9 of the Land Disputes Courts Act Cap
216).
Where the parties to the dispute before the Village Land Council are not satisfied with the decision
of the Council, the dispute in question shall be referred to the Ward Tribunal. As according to (s.9
of the Land Disputes Courts Act Cap 216).
Composition Of Ward Tribunal (s.11 of the Land Disputes Courts Act Cap 216)
Each Tribunal shall consist of not less than four nor more than eight members of whom three shall
be women who shall be elected by a Ward Committee.
Pecuniary Jurisdiction (s.15 of the Land Disputes Courts Act Cap 216).
The Jurisdiction of the Tribunal shall in all proceedings of a civil nature relating to land be limited
to the disputed land or property valued at three million shillings.
Powers Of The Tribunal (s.16 of the Land Disputes Courts Act Cap 216).
1. Order the recovery of possession of land;
2. Order the specific performance of any contract;
3. Make orders in the nature of an injunction both mandatory and prohibitive;
4. Award any amount claimed;
5. Award compensation;
6. Order the payment of any costs and expenses incurred by a Successful party or his
witnesses; or
7. Make any other order, which the justice of the case may require.
Institution of Complaint to Ward Tribunal (s.17 of the Land Disputes Courts Act Cap 216)
When a complaint is made to the Secretary under subsection (1), that Secretary shall cause it to be
submitted to the Chairman of the Tribunal who shall immediately select three members of the
Tribunal to mediate.
Where the complaint is received orally from the complainant, the Secretary shall immediately put it
in writing and produce a copy for the complainant.
Appearance By Advocate Prohibited (s.18 of the Land Disputes Courts Act Cap 216)
No advocate as such may appear and act for any party in a Ward Tribunal. The Ward Tribunal may
permit any relative or any member of the household of any part to any proceeding, upon request of
such party to appear and act for such party.
Also a Ward Tribunal in any proceeding to which a body corporate is a party may authorize its
director, secretary, member or a person in the employment of the body corporate to appear on
Civil Procedure and Practice ;
By Solicitor Katura
behalf, other than an advocate.
Appeals From Ward Tribunal (s.19 of the Land Disputes Courts Act Cap 216)
A person aggrieved by an order or decision of the Ward Tribunal may appeal to the District Land
and Housing Tribunal (DLHT).
Time For Appeal (s.20 of the Land Disputes Courts Act Cap 216)
Every appeal to a District Land and Housing Tribunal shall be filed in the District Land and
Housing Tribunal within forty-five days after the date of the decision or order against which the
appeal is brought.
The District Land and Housing Tribunal may for good and sufficient cause extend the time for
filing and appeal either before or after the expiration of forty-five days.
And where an appeal is made to the District Land and Housing Tribunal within the said period of
forty days, or any extension of time granted, the District Land and Housing Tribunal shall hear and
determine the appeal.
Establishment of the District Land and Housing Tribunal (s.22 of the Land Disputes Courts
Act Cap 216)
The Minister shall establish in each district, region or zone, as the case may be, a court to be known
as the District Land and Housing Tribunal.
The Court established shall exercise jurisdiction within the District, Region or Zone in which it is
established.
PART II
APPLICATIONS, SUMMONS AND SERVICE
Outline
1. Filing an Application. (r.3 of Land Disputes Courts Regulation, 2003)
2. Issue Of Summons
3. Service Of Summons
i) Filing an Application
Any proceedings before the Tribunal shall be commenced by an application filed by an applicant or
his representative through payment of appropriate fees prescribed in the first schedule of these
Regulations.(r.3(1) of Land Disputes Courts Regulation, 2003).
An application to the Tribunal shall be made in the form prescribed in the Second Schedule to these
Regulations and shall contain the following:-
1. The names and addresses of the parties involved.
2. The addresses of the suit premises or location of the Land involved in the dispute to which
the application relates.
3. Nature of disputes and cause of action.
4. Estimated value of the subject matter of the dispute.
5. Relief sought.
6. Amount of rent if the dispute involves payment of rent.(r.3(2) of Land Disputes Courts
Regulation, 2003).
Civil Procedure and Practice ;
By Solicitor Katura
Between
MEDDY KAGERE………………………………………………………………… APPLICANT
And
YUSUPH MACHO……………………………………………………………….RESPONDENT
APPLICATION
7. Relief(s) Claimed:
The Applicant prays for this Honorable Tribunal to grant judgement and decree against the
Respondent on the following orders and relief(s):-
1. A Declaration that the Applicant is the lawful owner of the suit property.
2. Permanent injunction to restrain the Respondent or his agents or workmen or
servants from demolishing the Applicant’s property.
3. Permanent injunction to restrain the Respondent or his agents or workmen or
servants from constructing any structure on the suit premises.
4. Demolition order to demolish any structure constructed on the suit premises by the
Respondent or his agents or workmen or servants.
5. Costs of this Application be borne by Respondent.
6. Any other relief(s)/orders the Honorable Tribunal will deem appropriate to grant.
Civil Procedure and Practice ;
By Solicitor Katura
VERIFICATION
I, MEDDY KAGERE, being the Applicant in this case hereby verify that what all has been stated
above in paragraph 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 is true to the best of my own knowledge, and what is stated
in paragraph 7 is the information supplied to me by my Advocate.
TO BE SERVED UPON:
YUSUPH MACHO,
P.O.BOX 7649,
KINONDONI,
DAR ES SALAAM.
The application form may be obtained from the Registry or sub-registry of the Tribunal by
the applicant or his representative upon payment of prescribed fees. (r.3(3) of Land Disputes
Courts Regulation, 2003)
N:B - Where there is an emergence or any dangerous situation on the part of the Applicant or
Civil Procedure and Practice ;
By Solicitor Katura
which threatens the Applicant. It needs the Applicant to prepare APPLICATION, CHAMBER
SUMMONS and AFFIDAVIT.
PART III
SUBMISSION OF WRITTEN STATEMENT OF DEFENCE, COUNTER AFFIDAVIT AND
COUNTER CLAIM.
Outline
1. Written Statement Of Defence. (r.7(1)(a).
2. Counter Affidavit. (r.7(1)(b).
3. Counter Claim. (r.7(2).
4. Extension of time. (r.7(3).
5. Fixing the Date of Hearing. (r.8(1).
6. Notice of date of hearing. (r.8(2).
7. Receiving Documents. (r.10).
Outline:-
1. Proceed Hearing.
2. Where Applicant is absent
3. Where Respondent is absent
4. Read the Application for Respondent
5. Evidences and submissions
6. Judgement
7. Contents of Judgement
I) Proceed Hearing.
The Tribunal shall proceed to hear the evidences on both sides and determine the application
where both parties are present. (r.11(1)(a) of Land Disputes Courts Regulation, 2003).
vi) Judgement
After receiving evidences and submissions, the Tribunal may pronounce judgement on the
spot or reserve judgement to be pronounced later. Provided that the judgement shall not be reserved
for a period of three months from the date of conclusion of the proceedings.(r.19(1) of Land
Disputes Courts Regulation, 2003).
3. An Appeal which must seek Certificate Of Point Of Law from the High court.
This is when the High Court exercises its appellate jurisdiction in the normal civil cases for the
cases originated from the Primary Court, here the aggrieved party must seek for a certificate of
point of Law from the High Court in order to appeal to the Court of Appeal.
As provided under THE APPELLATE JURISDICTION ACT CAP 141.
s.5.-(2)(c) In civil proceedings, except where any other written law for the time being in
force provides otherwise, no appeal shall lie against any decision or order of the HighCourt
in any proceedings under Head (c) of Part III of the Magistrates' Courts Act unless the High
Court certifies that a point of law is involved in the decision or order;
N.B;- The above leave or certificate of point law will be obtained only after lodging the notice of
appeal.
As provided under COURT OF APPEAL RULES, 2009
Rule-46(1) “Where an application for a certificate or for leave is necessary, it shall be
made after the notice of appeal is lodged”.
Between
JOSEPHINE RWEZAURA…………………………………………………..APPELLANT
And
KYEJU CONSULTING LIMITED…….......…………………………...RESPONDENT
(An appeal from the judgment of the High court of Tanzania, Land Division, at Dar es Salaam,
before Hon. Mwangesi J. dated…….August 2018 in Land Appeal No…..of 2018).
NOTICE OF APPEAL
(Under Rule 83(1) of the Tanzania Court of Appeal Rules, 2009)
TAKE NOTICE THAT JOSEPHINE RWEZAURA being dissatisfied with the decision of the
Honorable Mr. Mwangesi J. given at Dar es Salaam on the…......day of August 2016 intends to
appeal to the Court of Appeal of Tanzania against the whole of the said decision as decided.
………………………………………
ADVOCATE FOR THE APPLICANT
To
The Registrar
High Court of Tanzania
Land Division
Dar Es Salaam
Lodged in the High Court of Tanzania Land Division at Dar es Salaam this………..day
of…………………………………2018.
……………………………..
REGISTRAR
EXCEPTION
Except in the Land matters, whereby there must be a seek for a leave for the matter from the District
Land and Housing Tribunal and seek for a certificate of point of law from the High Court (Land
Division) for the matter from the Ward Tribunal, regardless the High Court (Land Division)
exercises its original or appellate jurisdiction.
Civil Procedure and Practice ;
By Solicitor Katura
N:B:- In case the High Court refused to grant leave, a fresh application should be made to the Court
of Appeal and not an appeal.
b) An Application for a leave to the High Court (Land Division), the proper provision to move the
Court is provided;-
Under THE LAND DISPUTES COURTS ACT, CAP 216.
s.47. (1) “Any person who is aggrieved by the decision of the High Court (Land Division) in
the exercise of its original, revisional or appellate jurisdiction, may with the leave from the
High Court (Land Division) appeal to the Court of Appeal in accordance with the Appellate
Jurisdiction Act.”
c) An Application for a leave to the Court of Appeal whether for the Land matters or other civil
matters after being rejected by the High Court, the suitable and relevant provision to move the
Court is provided;-
under THE APPELLATE JURISDICTION ACT, CAP 141.
s.5(1)(c) “In civil proceedings, except where any other written law for the time being in
force provides otherwise, an appeal shall lie to the Court of Appeal with the leave of the
High Court or of the Court of Appeal, against every other decree, order, judgment, decision
or finding of the High Court.”
d) An Application for a Certificate of point of law to the High Court for the matter originated from
the Primary Court. The suitable provision to move the Court is provided;-
under THE APPELLATE JURISDICTION ACT, CAP 141.
s.5(2)(c) “no appeal shall lie against any decision or order of the High Court in any
proceedings, unless the High Court certifies that a point of law is involved in the decision or
order.”
Civil Procedure and Practice ;
By Solicitor Katura
e) An Application for a Certificate of point of law to the High Court (Land Division) for the
matter originated from the Ward Tribunal. The suitable provision to move the Court is provided;-
Under THE LAND DISPUTES COURTS ACT, CAP 216.
47.(2) “Where an appeal to the Court of Appeal originates from the Ward Tribunal, the
appellant shall be required to seek for the Certificate from the High Court (Land Division)
certifying that there is point of law involved in the appeal.”
All Civil matters governed by CPC are suit and they are commenced by either plaint or other
manner.
FUNCTIONS OF PLEADINGS
CONTENTS OF PLEADINGS
1. Pleadings should contain only material facts and not evidences. This means, the pleading
should contain the "fact probanda"(facts which requires to be proved) and not "fact
probantia"(the evidences of all the facts). The documents attached to pleadings are not
evidences, they will become evidences latter when they are tendered before the Court of law
during hearing. Order VI, Rule 3.
2. The material facts should be stated in paragraphs and numbered. Order VI Rule.3.
3. Pleadings shall contain facts and not matters of law. It is a duty of a court to apply law and
a duty of a plaintiff to state the facts.
4. They have to be signed by both client and his advocate. Order VI Rule 14
5. Pleadings must be verified. Order VI Rule 15
Scenario
In 20th May, 2017 parties entered into a contract for construction of a residential house worth 500m
in Mwanza, the whole amount was paid in the same day, completion date agreed was 19th April,
2018, to date nothing has been done.
1. PLAINT
BETWEEN
DENIS TEMBA............................................................ PLAINTIFF
AND
CHACHA CONSTRUCTION LTD........................................... .................DEFENDANT
PLAINT
Opening statement
The Plaintiff above named states as follows:-
The agreement
4. That, on 28th May, 2017 the Plaintiff and Defendant entered into agreement for the
construction of the residential house at the consideration of 500 million.
Civil Procedure and Practice ;
By Solicitor Katura
The copy of the said agreement is hereby attached and marked as “DT-1” and leave of
the Court is sought to form part of the Plaint.
Payment
5. That, the whole amount of 500 million which is subject to the contract was paid in the same
day when the agreement was signed.
The time.
6. That, the completion date of the contract agreed between Plaintiff and Defendant was 19 th
April, 2018, to date nothing has been done.
WHEREFORE: The Plaintiff prays for judgement and decree against the defendant as follows,
for:-
1. An order declared that a defendant has breached the contract.
2. An order for payment of Tshs 500 millions being amount paid to the defendant for the
construction of the house.
3. An order for payment of 20% interest for the amount stated of 500 millions and for the time
wastage.
4. An order for payment of general damages to be assessed by the Court.
5. An order for payment of 20% on general damages.
6. An order for payment of costs.
7. Any other relief the Court may deem fit and just to grant.
VERIFICATION
I Denis Temba, being Plaintiff herein do hereby verified that what is stated in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, 4,
5, 6, and 7 is true to the best of my knowledge, while paragraph 8 is the information I received from
my advocate.
Between
DENIS TEMBA.................................................................................................. PLAINTIFF
And
CHACHA CONSTRUCTION LTD................................................... .................DEFENDANT
3. That, the contents of paragraph three of the Plaint are strongly disputed and the Plaintiff is
put into strictly proof.
4. That, the contents of paragraph four are disputed except that the defendant agreed that he
entered in the contract with the plaintiff.
5. That, the contents of paragraphs 5, 6, 7 and 8 are strongly disputed and the plaintiff is put to
strict proof thereto.
WHEREFORE; The Defendant prays that this Honourable Court dismisses the Plaintiff's suit in its
entirety with costs.
…................................
PRINCIPAL OFFICER OF THE DEFENDANT
AUTHORIZED TO SIGN AND
DEPOSE TO THE FACT OF THE CASE.
….............................
ADVOCATE FOR THE DEFENDANT
VERIFICATION
I, CHACHA MWITA MARANYA, being the Principal officer of the Company able to depose to
the facts of the case, do hereby verified what is stated herein in paragraph 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 is true to
the best of my knowledge.
Between
DENIS TEMBA.................................................................................................. PLAINTIFF
And
CHACHA CONSTRUCTION LTD................................................... .................DEFENDANT
WHEREFORE;- The Defendant prays that this Honourable Court dismiss the Plaintiff’s suit in its
entirety with costs.
…................................
PRINCIPAL OFFICER OF THE DEFENDANT
ABLE TO SIGN AND DISPOSE
TO THE FACT OF THE CASE.
….............................
ADVOCATE FOR THE DEFENDANT
VERIFICATION
I CHACHA MWITA MARANYA being the Principal officer of the Company able to depose to
the facts of the case, do hereby verified what is stated herein in paragraph 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 is true to
the best of my knowledge
Between
DENIS TEMBA............................................................ PLAINTIFF
And
CHACHA CONSTRUCTION LTD........................................... .................DEFENDANT
Civil Procedure and Practice ;
By Solicitor Katura
2. That the contents of paragraph 2 of the plaint are not disputed served that the address of
service of the defendant for the purpose of this suit shall be under care of:-
HAKMOR ATTONEYS,
KISHIMBA HOUSE,
2nd FLOOR, RWAGASORE STREET,
P.O.BOX 5567,
MWANZA, TANZANIA.
3. The contents of paragraph three of the Plaint are strongly disputed and the Plaintiff is put
into strictly proof.
4. The contents of paragraph four are disputed except that the defendant agreed that he entered
in the contract with the plaintiff.
5. The contents of paragraphs 5, 6, 7 and 8 are strongly disputed and the plaintiff is put to strict
proof thereto.
WHEREFORE; The Defendant prays that this Honourable Court dismisses the Plaintiff’s suit in
its entirety with costs.
…................................
PRINCIPAL OFFICER OF THE DEFENDANT
ABLE TO DEPOSE TO THE FACT OF THE CASE.
….............................
Civil Procedure and Practice ;
By Solicitor Katura
ADVOCATE FOR THE DEFENDANT
VERIFICATION
I CHACHA MWITA MARANYA being the Principal officer of the Company able to depose to
the facts of the case, do hereby verified what is stated herein in paragraph 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 is true to
the best of my knowledge
COUNTER-CLAIM
The Defendant repeats each and all of the foregoing allegations of Defence and Counterclaims from
the Plaintiff as follows:-
1. That, the Defendant by this counterclaim claims against the Plaintiff the sum of Tshs
200,000,000/= Millions being the amount due and owing by the Plaintiff to the Defendant
under the terms of the Charge and the Credit Agreement as at 30th June, 2016 together with
interest thereon at the rate of 20% interest from 1st July, 2016 until payment in full.
2. That, the Defendant avers (alleges) that the Plaintiff has by his own admission
acknowledged the aforesaid debt due and owing to the Defendant.
WHEREFORE; The Defendant by the counterclaim prays that the Plaintiff’s suit against it be
dismissed with costs and that judgment be entered on the counterclaim in the Defendant’s favour
for:-
Civil Procedure and Practice ;
By Solicitor Katura
1. The sum of Tshs 200,000,000/=Millions together with interest thereupon at the prevailing
commercial rates of interest from 1st July, 2018 until payment in full.
2. Costs of the counterclaim and interest thereupon at such rate and for such period of time as
this Honourable Court may deem fit to grant; and,
3. Such further or other reliefs as may be appropriate in the circumstances.
VERIFICATION
I CHACHA MWITA MARANYA being the Principal officer of the Company able to depose to
the facts of the case, do hereby verified what is stated herein in paragraph 1 and 2 is true to the best
of my knowledge
INTERLOCUTORY PROCEEDING
Relevant case
UNIVERSITY OF DAR ES SALAAM V. SYLVESTER CYPRIAN AND 210
OTHERS, [1998] TLR 176
Civil Procedure and Practice ;
By Solicitor Katura
It was stated that:- “Applications which are considered interlocutory, are those which do
not decide the rights of the parties, but are made for the purposes of keeping things in the
status quo till the rights can be decided”.
N:B: You can appeal , review or make revision for interlocutory orders if that order has the effect
of finalizing the case.
1. INTERIM PAYMENT
Meaning; This is amount of money that is paid before the total amount of money owed is decided.
In practice; The plaintiff has filed the Plaint, defendant replied by Written Statement of Defence,
and the plaintiff realized that the defendant has admitted part of the his claims, therefore the
plaintiff can apply for the interim payment judgement of that claim admitted, before they can
proceed with the rest which are not admitted.
ORDER XII. RULE 4. “Any party may at any stage of a suit, where admissions of fact have been
made either on the pleading, or otherwise, apply to the court for such judgment or order as upon
such admissions he may be entitled to, without waiting for determination of any other question
between the parties; and the court may upon such application make such order, or give such
judgment, as the court may think just.”
In practice; A security which a defendant in an action may require of a plaintiff who does not
reside within the jurisdiction of the court, for the payment of such costs as may be awarded to the
defendant.
ORDER XXV. RULE 1(1) “Where, at any stage of a suit, it appears to the court that a sole
plaintiff is, or (when there are more plaintiffs than one) that all the plaintiffs are residing out of
Tanzania, and that such plaintiff does not, or that no one of such plaintiffs does, possess any
sufficient immovable property within Tanzania other than the property in suit, the court may, either
of its own motion or on the application of any defendant, order the plaintiff or plaintiffs, within a
time fixed by it, to give security for the payment of all costs incurred and likely to be incurred by
any defendant.”
ORDER XXXVI. RULE 6. (1) Where, at any stage of a suit, the court is satisfied, by affidavit or
otherwise, that the defendant, with intent to obstruct or delay the execution of any decree that may
be passed against him-
(a) is about to dispose of the whole or any part of his property;
(b) is about to remove the whole or any part of his property from the local limits of the jurisdiction
of the court, the court may direct the defendant, within a time to be fixed by it, either to furnish
security, in such sum as may be specified in the order, to produce and place at the disposal of the
court, when required, the said property or the value of the same, or such portion thereof as may be
sufficient to satisfy the decree, or to appear and show cause why he should not furnish security.
(2) The plaintiff shall, unless the court otherwise directs, specify the property required to be
attached and the estimated value thereof.
(3) The court may also in the order direct the conditional attachment of the whole or any portion of
the property so specified.
ORDER XXXVII. RULE 7. “The court may, on the application of any party to a suit, order the
sale, by any person named in such order, and in such manner and on such terms as it thinks fit, of
any movable property, being the subject matter of such suit or attached before judgment in such
Civil Procedure and Practice ;
By Solicitor Katura
suit, which is subject to speedy and natural decay or which for any other just and sufficient cause it
may be desirable to have sold at once.”
6. TEMPORARY INJUNCTION
This is a restraining order or a temporary court order issued to prohibit an individual from carrying
out a particular action, especially approaching or contacting a specified person. This is governed by
the following provisions:-
ORDER XXXVII. RULE 1 & 2 “Where in any suit it is proved by affidavit or otherwise–
(a) that any property in dispute in a suit is in danger of being wasted, damaged, or alienated by any
party to the suit of or suffering loss of value by reason of its continued use by any party to the suit,
or wrongly sold in execution of a decree;”
(b) “that the defendant threatens, or intends to remove or dispose of his property with a view to
defraud his creditors, the court may by order grant a temporary injunction to restrain such act or
make such other order for the purpose of staying and preventing the wasting, damaging, alienation,
sale, loss in value, removal or disposition of the property as the court thinks fit, until the disposal of
the suit or until further orders:
Provided that an order granting a temporary injunction shall not be made against the
Government, but the court may in lieu (replace) thereof make an order declaratory of the rights of
the parties.”
2.-(1) “In any suit for restraining the defendant from committing a breach of contract or other injury
of any kind, whether compensation is claimed in the suit or not, the plaintiff may, at any time after
the commencement of the suit and either before or after judgment, apply to the court for a
temporary injunction to restrain the defendant form committing the breach of contract or injury
complained of, or any breach of contract or injury of a like kind arising out of the same contract or
relating to the same property or right:
Provided that no application shall be made for a temporary injunction where the defendant
is the Attorney-General but, in such case, the plaintiff may apply to the court for an order
declaratory of the rights of the parties.”
(2) “In case of disobedience or of breach of any such terms, the court granting an injunction may
order the property of the person guilty of such disobedience or breach to be attached and may also
order such person to be detained as a civil prisoner for a term not exceeding six months, unless in
Civil Procedure and Practice ;
By Solicitor Katura
the meantime the court directs his release.”
(3) “No attachment under this rule shall remain in force for more than one year, at the end of which
time, if the disobedience or breach continues, the property attached may be sold, and out of the
proceeds the court may award such compensation as it thinks fit, and shall pay the balance, if any,
to the party entitled thereto.”
SECTION 68(c). “In order to prevent the ends of justice from being defeated the court may grant a
temporary injunction and in case of disobedience commit the person guilty thereof as a civil
prisoner and order that his property be attached and sold”
SECTION 95. “Nothing in this Code shall be deemed to limit or otherwise affect the inherent
power of the court to make such orders as may be necessary for the ends of justice or to prevent
abuse of the process of the court.”
Relevant case
ATTILIO VS. MBOWE (1969) HCD 284.
It was stated that; “It is generally agreed that, there are three conditions which must be
satisfied before such an injunction can be issued:-
1. There must be serious question to be tried on the facts alleged, and a probability that
the plaintiff will be entitled to the relief prayed;
2. That the Court’s interference is necessary to protect the plaintiff from the kind of
injury which may be irreparable before his legal right is established, and
3. That on the balance there will be greater hardship and mischief suffered by the
Civil Procedure and Practice ;
By Solicitor Katura
plaintiff from the withholding of the injunction than will be suffered by the
defendant from the granting of it.
Order XXXVII Rule.3. “In addition to such terms as the keeping of an account and giving
security, the court may by order grant injunction under rule 1 or rule 2 and such order shall be in
force for a period specified by the court, but not exceeding six months: Provided that the court
granting the injunction may, from time to time extend such period for a further period which in the
aggregate shall not exceed one year.”
ISSUING OF NOTICE
Order XXXVII Rule.4. “The court shall in all cases, before granting an injunction, direct notice
of application for the same to be given to the opposite party, except where it appears that the giving
of such notice would cause undue delay and that the object of granting the injunction, would
thereby be defeated”.
CHAMBER SUMMONS
This is a document which is used to bring an existing legal action before the court for orders that are
designed to ready the action for hearing. These may also be known as a chamber application and are
generally supported by affidavits and not spoken evidence.
AT MWANANYAMALA
CHAMBER SUMMONS
(Made under ORDER XXXVII RULE 1, s.68(c) and s.95 of the Civil Procedure Code Cap 33
and any other enabling provision of the law)
This Application has been taken out at the instance of GREAT LAW CHAMBERS and is
supported by the annexed affidavit of OMAR YUSUPH MWINYI the Applicant, together with
other grounds as may be adduced at the hearing.
GIVEN UNDER my hand and the seal of this Court this …...............day of …...............2018
...........................................
TRIBUNAL CHAIRMAN
AFFIDAVIT
An affidavit is a written statement from an individual which is sworn to be true it is essentially an
oath that what they are saying is the truth.
AT MWANANYAMALA
Between
OMAR YUSUPH MWINYI………………………..…….................................……..APPLICANT
And
NURDIN SHABANI MKAMA.....................................................................….RESPONDENT
AFFIDAVIT
I, OMAR YUSUPH MWINYI, an adult, Muslim and a resident of Dar es salaam DO HEREBY
MAKE OATH and state as hereunder;-
1. That, I am the Applicant in this matter and thus conversant with the facts that I am about to
depose herein under.
Civil Procedure and Practice ;
By Solicitor Katura
2. That, I am the lawful owner of the plot of land No 163 under the right of occupancy No…
located at Mbweni area, Malindi, at Kinondoni District with a right of occupancy for a
period of 33 years.
3. That, I acquired the Plot of land since 1 st April 2001 and I was then registered as the official
owner of the property.
A copy of the certificate of title is attached herewith and marked as Annexure
“MAA- 1” and the Applicant seeks for a leave of this Honorable Tribunal to
refer to it and forming part of this Affidavit.
4. That, sometimes in 2013 it came to the knowledge of the applicant that the respondent had
trespassed onto the land of the applicant and had already started constructing a house.
Photos of the building that is on the applicants plot are attached herewith and
marked as annexure “MAA-2” and the applicant seeks for a leave of this
Honorable Tribunal to refer to it and forming part of this affidavit.
5. That, after making several communications with the respondent to stop the construction the
respondent disagreed and with total arrogance continued with the construction.
6. That, on the 9th August 2013 the applicant wrote a letter to the kinondoni municipal council
complaining about the trespass on her land.
A copy of the letter is attached herewith and marked as annexure “MAA-3”and the
applicant seeks for a leave of this Honorable Tribunal to it and forming part of
this affidavit.
7. That, on the 13th August 2013 the kinondoni municipal council summoned the respondent
with a letter with reference no MEK/MB/VO/11/6.The kinondoni municipal council ordered
the respondent to stop construction with immediate effect, an order which the respondent
has disrespectfully disagreed with.
A copy of the letter is attached herewith and marked as annexure “MAA-4”and the
applicant seeks for a leave of this honorable tribunal to it as forming part of this
affidavit.
Civil Procedure and Practice ;
By Solicitor Katura
8. That, on the 11th December 2013 the kinondoni municipal council authorized the applicant
to construct a fence around the plot.
A copy of the letter from the kinondoni municipal council is attached herewith and
marked as annexure “MAA-5”and the applicant seeks for a leave of this
Honorable Tribunal to it and forming part of this affidavit.
9. That, the respondent has continued with his construction and used his workmen to fill the
fence foundation that was constructed by the applicant.
10. That, the applicant then wrote a letter to the officer commanding district (OCD) of wazo hill
to complain about the respondents act.
A copy of the letter is attached herewith and marked as annexure “MAA-5” and
the applicant seeks for a leave of this Honorable Tribunal to it and forming part
of this affidavit.
11. That, the officer commanding district (OCD) then issued a RB against the respondent.
A copy of the RB is attached herewith and marked as annexure “MAA-6”and the
applicant craves for the leave of this Honorable Tribunal to it as forming part of
this affidavit.
12. That, without this honorable tribunal intervention the respondent will continue developing
the applicants land.
13. That, it is in the interest of justice that this honorable tribunal issues temporary injunction
against the respondent and his workmen to stop construction process pending determination
of the suit.
14. That, the Applicant has filed this Application without unreasonable delay as the Respondent
unlawful occupies the said plot of land therefore the intervention of this Honorable court is
of extreme urgency to ensure that justice is served.
15. That, I make this affidavit in support of the orders sought for in the chamber summons.
Civil Procedure and Practice ;
By Solicitor Katura
VERIFICATION
I, OMAR YUSUPH MWINYI states that, all what has been stated under paragraph 1, 2, 3, 4, and
5 is true to the best of my own knowledge.
BEFORE ME:
……………………………………
COMMISSIONER FOR OATHS
ASANTE SANA.
By SOLICITOR KATURA.