Professional Documents
Culture Documents
The (Almost) Complete History of 'Fake News' - BBC
The (Almost) Complete History of 'Fake News' - BBC
The (Almost) Complete History of 'Fake News' - BBC
Menu
BBC Trending
22 January 2018
ALAMY
"We ended up finding a small cluster of news websites all registered in the
same town in Macedonia called Veles," Silverman recalls.
He and a colleague started to investigate, and shortly before the US
election they identified at least 140 fake news websites which were
pulling in huge numbers on Facebook.
The young people in Veles may or may not have had much interest in
American politics, but because of the money to be made via Facebook
advertising, they wanted their fiction to travel widely on social media. The
US presidential election - and specifically Donald Trump - was (and of
course still is) a very hot topic on social media.
And so the Macedonians and other purveyors of fakery wrote stories with
headlines such as "Pope Francis Shocks World, Endorses Donald Trump for
President" and "FBI Agent Suspected in Hillary Email Leaks Found Dead in
Apparent Murder-Suicide".
They were completely false. And thus began the modern - and internet-
friendly - life of the phrase "fake news".
A cluster of sites run from Veles sparked interest in the role of Facebook
algorithms in spreading fake viral stories
In the wake of President Trump's victory, BBC Trending delved into the
huge world of pro-Trump Facebook groups. Inside those hyper-partisan
spaces there were some outright falsehoods circulating.
FACEBOOK
But pundits scrambling to explain the shock result (and in many cases, their
own follies) turned to "fake news" as one possible explanation.
Enter politics
The phrase now evokes much more than those get-rich-quick Macedonian
teenagers. President Trump even gave out "Fake News Awards" to
reporters who had made errors or poor predictions - with a special nod to
all reporting on the ongoing and very real investigations into collusion
between the Trump campaign and Russia.
But to say that President Trump was the first politician to deploy the term
would itself be, well, "fake news".
"It's now clear that so-called fake news can have real-world consequences,"
she said. "This isn't about politics or partisanship. Lives are at risk… lives of
ordinary people just trying to go about their days, to do their jobs,
contribute to their communities."
S j li h i i dh k f
Some journalists at the time interpreted her remarks as a reference to
"Pizzagate", a bonkers conspiracy theory which sprouted and grew to
tremendous proportions online.
It started with a rumour that sex slaves were being held under a
Washington pizza restaurant, and ended a couple of days before Clinton's
speech, when a man entered the busy family-friendly restaurant with a rifle.
Nobody was injured, and the man was arrested and sentenced to four years
in jail.
COURT FILING
But in that speech, Clinton also asked her audience to help "protect our
democracy". Other reporters interpreted that more broadly as a reference
to the election.
President-elect Trump took up the phrase the following month, in January
2017, a little over a week before taking office. In response to a question, he
said "you're fake news" to CNN reporter Jim Acosta. Around the same time
he started repeating the phrase on Twitter.
Donald J. Trump
@realDonaldTrump
"That signalled to the many people out there who were supporting Trump
and running websites supportive of him, that he was saying 'OK, we're going
to take this term and make it ours'," Silverman says.
The fake news horse had not just bolted from the stable, it was off and
running.
GETTY IMAGES
Useless words?
Since then phrase has been used more or less continuously by Trump and
other world leaders, as well as by countless political operatives, journalists
and ordinary people. As a rough guide, a Google News search of "fake news"
throws up 5 million results, and already in 2018 the phrase has been used
about two million times on Twitter.
But within months the sheer ubiquity of the phrase "fake news" had perhaps
rendered the term meaningless. All sorts of things - misinformation, spin,
conspiracy theories, mistakes, and reporting that people just don't like -
have been rolled into it.
"We did this to ourselves, and by 'we', I mean the media," says Alexios
Mantzarlis, director of the Poynter Institute's International Fact-Checking
Network. "Right aer the election, in editorials, in news articles, we started
calling 'fake news' a bit of everything.
"We should be conscious that our industry is partly to blame for the
confusion we're at."
And some experts with huge experience in the field have started to back
away from the fake news fire altogether.
"The reason I don't like the phrase now is it's used as a term to describe
everything," says Clare Wardle of First Dra News, a truth-seeking non-
profit based at Harvard's Shorenstein Centre. "Whether it's a sponsored
post, an ad, a visual meme, a bot on Twitter, a rumour - people just use it
against any information they don't like."
"This is a really complex problem," she says. "If we're going to start thinking
of ways we can intervene, we're going to have to have clear definitions."
Wardle says that an obsession with the phrase (and yes, this story
admittedly might be a part of that) is actually hurting the credibility of
otherwise credible news outlets.
Mantzarlis says that while he's concerned about language creep, he isn't
ready to abandon it altogether - although he would like to see "fake news"
restricted to descriptions of spammy made-up stories wrecking Facebook
news feeds.
"Just because someone else is using the term to mean something different
doesn't mean it loses its value," he says. "If someone starts calling a
telephone a banana, and has a very big megaphone, doesn't mean that the
rest of us should stop calling a telephone a telephone."
GETTY IMAGES
Going viral
Clearly the enabler of the modern form of "fake news" - or, if you like,
misinformation - has been the explosive growth of social media.
"In the early days of Twitter, people would call it a 'self-cleaning oven',
because yes there were falsehoods, but the community would quickly
debunk them," Wardle says. "But now we're at a scale where if you add in
automation and bots, that oven is overwhelmed.
"There are many more people now acting as fact-checking and trying to
clean all the ovens, but it's at a scale now that we just can't keep up."
"We're been heralding robotic fact checking for about 20 years and we're
nowhere near it," he says. "What we can do is help humans and journalists
find fishy claims faster, and get access to the stats that they need to verify a
claim faster."
But all the fact-checking institutions in the world will never be able to beat
down every rumour or fake "fact" And while some media reports have cast
down every rumour or fake "fact". And while some media reports have cast
doubt on the efficacy of fact-checking, Mantzarlis is convinced that his
work has an impact.
"What we've seen over the past two years is that consistently, across the
board, regardless of partisanship, when people get told a falsehood and get
People might be "fact resistant", but very few are "fact immune", he says.
GETTY IMAGES
"The opaqueness of these platforms and their power and the fact that so
much speech has moved on to them is something that we need to pay
attention to and make sure that we don't turn them from places where
misinformation is running rampant to places that are so locked down that
they are inhibiting speech," he says.
Alongside worries about the power of the social media companies, the
experts also have concerns about the power of governments.
And beyond viral political text news stories, there are new frontiers which
fact-checkers are trying to delve into.
"I really think we need to be thinking of visuals more. Visuals are very
powerful vehicles of disinformation," Claire Wardle says.
Oen photos are travelling with rapid speed on closed messaging apps such
as WhatsApp or Viber. And while the discussion about "fake news" has
focused on the West, a lot of misinformation like this is circulating about
health, religion and society outside of the US, in developing countries.
"The power of something like WhatsApp is that it's travelling between very
close networks of peers who are much more likely to trust each other,"
Wardle says.
Impact?
In one of the first academic studies about the consumption of fake news,
researchers at Princeton, Dartmouth and the University of Exeter estimated
that about 25 percent of Americans visited a fake news website in a six-
week period around the time of the 2016 US election.
But the researchers also found that the visits were highly concentrated -
10% of readers made 60% of the visits. And crucially, the researchers
concluded "fake news does not crowd out hard news consumption."
"The reach was relatively wide, but not so deep," Mantzarlis says. "It's quite
a big step further to say, are people voting on this, making decisions on it."
"To say it's poisoning our democracy or it won this guy or the other guy an
election, we need a lot more research to be able to say that."
Related Topics
3 hours ago
2 hours ago
6 hours ago
Features
Wh Ni i
Why Nigerian protesters are upset
with Beyoncé
Most Read
US Election 2020: Biden seeks to clarify remark on ending oil 1
Emily in Paris: Netflix hit's creator Darren Star 'not sorry' for
7
'clichés'
On your mobile
On smart speakers
Terms of Use About the BBC Privacy Policy Cookies Accessibility Help
Why you can trust the BBC Advertise with us AdChoices / Do Not Sell My Info
© 2020 BBC. The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read about our
approach to external linking.