Professional Documents
Culture Documents
The Human Act
The Human Act
Actions, since they are products of our thoughts and desires, reveal our moral character. What we
are and what becomes of us as persons depends on our choices and actuations.
Human acts are those performed by a person who is acting knowingly,, freely, and willfully. These
actions are deliberate ,intentional, or voluntary. They are differentiated from acts of mans which are
instinctive and are not under the control of the free will.
An act is considered a human act, when it is done knowingly, freely, and willfully.
1. An act is done knowingly when the doer is conscious and aware of the reason and the consequences of
his actions. Every normal person of age is presumed to act knowingly. However, children below the age of
reason, the senile and the insane-are considered incapable of moral judgment.
2. An act is done freely when the doer acts by his own initiative and choice without being forced to do so
by another person or situation. An action done under duress and against one's freewill is not a voluntary
action. A person is not acting freely when he gives up his money to a robber who threatens him with a
Knife.
3. An act is done willfully when the doer consents to the act, accepting it as his own, and assumes
accountability for its consequences.
An act which lacks of any of the above mentioned attributes 1s ether imperfectly voluntary or
involuntary
B. Commanded acts are the mental and bodily actions pet 1ormed under the command of the Will. These
are either internal or external actions.
Internal actions are those performed mentally, such as reasoning, recalling, imagining, and reflecting.
External actions are those performed bodily, such as walking, dancing, talking, and writing.
All external actions derive themselves from the internal acts, since every deliberate act is first thought of
and decided mentally. Thus, philosopher speak of human acts as "being first in intention, but last in
execution (Paul Gienn, Ethics: A Class Manual in Moral Philosophy, p.7-8).
Moral Distinctions
On the basis of their conformity or non-conformity with the norm of morality, human acts are either
moral, immoral, or amoral.
1. Moral actions are those in conformity with the norm of moral- ity. They are good and permissible actions,
such as working, studying. paying debts, telling the truth, loving someone, etcetera.
2. Immoral actions are those which are not in conformity with the norm of morality. They are evil and
prohibited actions, Such as cursing, cheating, stealing, lying, etcetera.
3. Amoral actions are those which stand neutral or indifferent to
the norm of morality. These acts are neither good nor evil, but they may become evil because of
Circumstances.. Playing basketball be- comes morally wrong when it causes a student to miss his class.
Drinking wine is amoral, but excessive drinking is wrong.
The adjectives ethical and unethical are respectively synonymous with right and wrong, proper and
improper. They best describe actions in relation to professional standards rather than in relation to moral
laws. A doctor who reveals information about his patient is unethical but not necessarily immoral.
1. The doer is able to foresee the evil result or consequence though in a general way;
2. The doer is free to refrain from doing that action which would result in the foreseen evil;
3. The doer has the moral obligation not to do that which would result in something evil. (Paul Glenn: 18-
19).
Acts with Double Effect: Alfredo Panizo cites these principles (bid: 38-39)
1. A person is held morally responsible for any evil effect which flows from the action directly willed and as
a natural consequence of such action, though such evil effect 1s not directly willed nor intended.
2. A human act with double effect, one good and another evil, morally permissible under four conditions. A
Violation of any case conditions makes an act unjustifiable. These conditions are:
1. The action which produces double effects must be good in itself, or at least morally indifferent.
2. The good effect must not come from the evil effect. It is never justified to do evil in order to attain
something good
3. The purpose of the doer is the attainment of the good effect, with the evil effect being tolerated as
an incidental result.
4. The good effect must outweigh in importance the evil result.
These principles apply to "therapeutic abortion, a medical process intended directly to saving the
life of the mother with the sad result of aborting the fetus.
Reading
Moral Sensibility
Moral sensibility 1s our response towards what is right or wrong Some people nave strong aversion
towards wrongdoings, while some are dismissive of them. Some are intolerant and stern, while others
are tolerant and accommodating.
Persons who are liberal and open-minded are inclined to accept evil as a normal occurrence, giving
in to such thoughts as ganyan kasi tao lamang kast bala pakasi walang aral or kasi masama ang gising
People who are intolerant and strict are inclined to punish people "para matuto", "para di na umulir", or
"para magbago"
Moral sensibility may be compared to the sensitivity to pain. Some endure pain longer than others
can. Sensitivity to pain is a good thing because it warns us about a danger. A moderate moral sensibility
may be good to us too. It is moral sensitivity which objects to an indecent behavior or an obscene movie. lt
is moral sensibility which protests against an act of injustice or cruelty. lt is moral sensibility which pre-
vents us from making a fool of ourselves. We use to call moral sensibility as "delicadeza When a person is
not scandalized by what is wrong. when he does not recoil from what IS outrageous, when he is not
ashamed of his vices- he is devoid of moral sensibility, he is " manhig"
A person who lacks moral sensibility is inclined to act accordingly to his self-interest. He would
readily steal to enrich himself, or even commit murder to arrogate power. Adolf Hitler is one such
dangerous and wicked person.
Exercise no 1.
Answer briefly.
2. What moral principle is involved when a car driver who is involved in an accident is
charged with reckless imprudence causing damage to property?