Professional Documents
Culture Documents
What Is New in The Treatment of Sepsis
What Is New in The Treatment of Sepsis
What Is New in The Treatment of Sepsis
UNIVERSITY
TOPIC- WHAT IS THE NEW IN
TREATMENT OF SEPSIS?
BY – KOMAL JAISWAL
Introduction
• Sepsis is one of the oldest described illnesses. The term sepsis is derived
from the ancient Greek term (“make rotten”) and was used by
Hippocrates.
• After its recognition, it took over 2,000 years to establish the hypothesis
that it is not the pathogen itself but rather the host response that is
responsible for the symptoms seen in sepsis.
• Clear definitions are of great importance in the medical field, as
appropriate treatment of illness demands a correct preceding diagnosis.
This is not always simple, and, particularly in emergency and intensive
care medicine, fast and reliable diagnosis is needed to treat acute illness.
The challenge of fast diagnosis of sepsis is that this syndrome is based on
highly complex pathophysiological pathways that may show varying
clinical signs and symptoms.
From understanding to defining
sepsis
The former understanding of sepsis as a hyper-inflammatory
response to infection, often accompanied by a fast “cytokine
storm” 11, was the basis for former sepsis definitions: the US critical
care specialist Roger Bone organized a consensus conference in 1992
and suggested that the sepsis definition include the aspect of host
response. Here, the term systemic inflammatory response syndrome
(SIRS), which is still commonly used, was defined.
If SIRS occurs without infection (for example, in the case of burns and
pancreatitis and in the post-operative setting), the condition is defined
only as SIRS; similarly, an infection without SIRS does not equal sepsis.
Therefore, sepsis was defined as “a systemic inflammatory
response syndrome to infection” (“Sepsis-1”) that may be
seen when two or more of the following criteria are fulfilled:
✓ core temperature of more than 38°C (100.4°F) or less than 36°C
( 96.8°F)
✓ respiratory rate of more than 20 breatheart rate of more than 90
beats/minute
✓ hs/minute or partial pressure of carbon dioxide (PaCO 2) of less than
32 mmHg
✓ white blood cell count of more than 12,000/mL or less than 4,000/
mL or more than 10% immature neutrophils(abnormal white blood
cell count).
Sepsis-2 (“PIRO” )
A classification system allowing the stratification of patients with sepsis,
“PIRO” (today called “Sepsis-2”), was developed at conference in 2001.
“P” stands for predisposition, “I” for type and extent of the primary
insult (in the case of sepsis, primary infection), “R” for type and extent
of host response, and “O” for extent of organ dysfunction.
The benefit of the PIRO model is that it enabled one to separate
morbidity due to the infection itself from secondary morbidity that
develops through the host response.
The introductions of a PIRO model, however, remained theoretical,
even though there have been several attempts to introduce a point
system that enables scoring of patients with sepsis
Sepsis-3
A new approach (“Sepsis-3”) was developed that is based on patient
data from several validated sources and that was published in the form
of three articles in 2016.
What is new in this concept? On the one hand, it is the omission of
SIRS as a factor in the definition.
The new Sepsis-3 defines sepsis as “a life-threatening organ
dysfunction caused by a dysregulated host response to infection” 15.
Therefore, if no organ dysfunction is seen, one may speak only of an
infection, not of “sepsis”.
Stages of sepsis
There are three stages of sepsis:
❑ sepsis
❑ severe sepsis
❑ septic shock.
The term “severe sepsis” is superfluous, as its criteria (organ
dysfunction) are already included in the new definition of sepsis. The
term “septic shock” remains; however, it now also includes an
elevated lactate level of more than 2 mmol/L as an additional factor.
SOFA
Part of the new Sepsis-3 definitions is SOFA as a grading score for
defining acute organ dysfunction (“Sequential [Sepsis-related] Organ
Failure Assessment Score”, or SOFA score) .
This score allocates points according to pathological change in six
different organ systems; an increase in the total SOFA score by at least
two points.
In 2016 a new consensus was reached to replace screening
by systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) with the
sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA score) and the
abbreviated version (qSOFA).
qSOFA (“quickSOFA”)is intended primarily for use in emergency
departments, peripheral wards, rest homes, and so on and not in ICUs, and
it consists of the following three criteria:
➢ respiratory rate of more than 22 breaths/minute
➢ systolic blood pressure of less than 100 mmHg.
➢ Glasgow coma scale score of less than 15 (This scale is used to determine
your level of consciousness.)
When two of these three qSOFA criteria are met, organ dysfunction should
be suspected, and the classic SOFA score should be determined by
experienced physicians, usually intensive care specialists.
Operationalization of clinical criteria identifying patients with
sepsis and septic shock
What causes sepsis?
Any infection can trigger sepsis, but the following types of infections are more likely to
cause sepsis:
• pneumonia
• abdominal infection
• kidney infection
• bloodstream infection
According to the National Institute of General Medical Sciences, the number of sepsis
cases in the United States increases every year. Possible reasons for the increase include:
• an aging population, because sepsis is more common in seniors
• an increase in antibiotic resistance, which happens when an antibiotic loses its ability
to resist or kill bacteria
• an increase in the number of people with illnesses that weaken their immune systems
How is sepsis diagnosed?
If you have symptoms of sepsis, your doctor will order tests to make a diagnosis
and determine the severity of your infection. One of the first tests is a blood
test. Your blood is checked for complications like:
• infection
• clotting problems
• abnormal liver or kidney function
• decreased amount of oxygen
• an imbalance in minerals called electrolytes that affect the amount of water in
your body as well as the acidity of your blood
Depending on your symptoms and the results of your blood test, your
doctor may order other tests, including:
• a urine test (to check for bacteria in your urine)
• a wound secretion test (to check an open wound for an infection)
• a mucus secretion test (to identify germs responsible for an infection)
If your doctor can’t determine the source of an infection using the above
tests, they may order an internal view of your body using one of the
following:
• X-rays to view the lungs
• CT scans to view possible infections in the appendix, pancreas, or bowel area
• ultrasounds to view infections in the gallbladder or ovaries
• MRI scans, which can identify soft tissue infections
Quality improvement in sepsis
management
Around 15 years ago, three international research societies founded
the SSC(Surviving Sepsis Campaign ), aiming to reduce sepsis
mortality by more than 25% (relative risk reduction) over 5 years.The
first version was published in 2004 and the third revision in 2017.
The drug company behind APC, Eli Lilly, has announced the
discontinuation of all ongoing clinical trials using this drug for
treating patients with severe sepsis or septic shock.
•
Strategies to treat sepsis
(experimental)
➢ Targeting bacterial pathogens (Antistaphylococcal monoclonal,
Antipseudomonas monoclonal,Lytic bacteriophage against
Pseudomonas aeruginosa )
➢ Targeting endotoxin (Eritoran,TAK-242, Alakaline phosphatase,
Immobilized polymyxin B filter)
➢ Targeting superantigens (Superantigen antagonists)
➢ Targeting signal transduction & inflammatory response (Polyclonal
TNF Fab fragments,Vagal nerve stimulation,a7-nicotinic acetylcholine
receptor agonists,HMGB-1 inhibitors,Anti-RAGE, Suppressors of
cytokine signaling,High-volume hemofiltration,PPARg agonist, Statins)
➢ Targeting the gut (Bovine lactoferrin, Recombinant human
lactoferrin)
➢ Targeting coagulation cascade/endothelium (Transgenic
antithrombin, Activated protein C,Activated protein C variants,
Recombinant soluble thrombomodulin )
➢ Targeting complement ( Anti-C5a antibodies Repletion of protective
molecules,Inter a inhibitor proteins,Estrogen receptor binding
agonists)
➢ Targeting immunosuppression (Inhibitors of lymphocyte apoptosis,
siRNA against Fas and BIM, HIV protease inhibitors,IL-7 and -15,Anti-
PD-1 )
➢ Reversing monocyte hyporesponsiveness (GM-CSF, IFN-g)
InnovoSep
New Research brings much-needed hope for the treatment of
sepsis. Researchers at the Royal College of Surgeons in
Ireland (RCSI) have tested a compound called cilengitide in a
preclinical trial. The drug goes by the brand name InnovoSep.
Principal investigator Steve Kerrigan of InnovoSep said, "Our
research has shown the InnovoSep candidate drug can prevent
sepsis progression early or indeed treat advanced sepsis.
The drug appears to act by preventing the bacteria from getting
into the bloodstream from the site of infection by stabilising the
blood vessels so that they cannot leak bacteria and infect the
major organs.“
In the preclinical trial, the researchers successfully used
InnovoSep to inhibit S. aureus and E. coli from binding to
human endothelial cells, both in vivo and in vitro.
Endothelial cells are “the first barrier between the blood
and the extravascular space.”
Hence,it is very new research so the trial is going on….!!
Extracorporeal Therapies
More recently, extracorporeal techniques have been employed in both
adults and children in treating sepsis. Extracorporeal therapies include
continuous renal replacement (CRRT), plasma-based removal
techniques, and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO).
These treatments could theoretically
1) provide immunohomeostasis of pro- and anti-inflammatory
cytokines and other sepsis mediators
2) decrease organ microthrombosis through removal of pro-
coagulant factors and modulating the impaired septic coagulation
response in sepsis
3) provide mechanical support of organ perfusion during the acute
septic episode to allow time for response to traditional sepsis
therapies and antimicrobials.
CRRT is beneficial in managing fluid overload and acute
renal failure in sepsis. Removal of sepsis mediators through
the technique is variable, and the outcome impact of CRRT
on sepsis has not been definitively determined. High-flow
CRRT has demonstrated benefit in septic adults.
Intriguing early results suggest that plasma exchange could
improve outcomes in both adults and children.
Based on experience, ECMO is recommended for
refractory septic shock in neonates and should be
considered for use in children.
Ongoing trials may help determine whether the promise of
extracorporeal therapies translates into outcome
improvement in septic children.
Extracorporeal endotoxin binding by polymyxin B
hemoperfusion
A toxic substance is associated with the membrane of bacteria,
and called it ‘endotoxin’ . Endotoxin infusion mimics many of
the inflammatory, metabolic, cardiovascular changes
observed in sepsis patients and represents one of the main
inducers of shock in sepsis.
Clinical research has shown that endotoxin is indeed circulating
in the blood of up to 50% of sepsis shock patients and
associated with impaired clinical outcome .
In view of the pivotal role of endotoxin in sepsis patients, the
idea of ‘blood purification’ emerged. Polysterene fiber filters
coated with polymyxin B are able to bind endotoxin.
The primary end-point of this
study was the change in
hemodynamic stability.
Secondary endpoints included
change in SOFA-score and
mortality.
Polymyxin B (PMX)
hemoperfusion has been
shown in numerous studies to
successfully remove endotoxin
and potentially improve
outcomes.
Proposed prospective treatment
The proposed auxiliary therapy is based on the application of bacterial
polyvalent antibody-column (BPVAC) for neutralization of wide
spectra of blood bacterial antigens and their toxins (BATs) known as causal
agents of prevalent types of bacterial sepses.
The course of resuscitation of septic patients, BPVAC behaves as the key unit.
It would trap bacteria and remove their toxins from the blood out of the
body.
BPVACs perform as out of body detoxification for trapping of BATs from
septic blood and check them from returning back to the patient’s body.
Schematic diagram of proposed setup for
prospective auxiliary treatment of sepses.
Notes: It uses BPVAC for removing BATs from the blood
of septic patients. BPVAC would work aseptically with
the aid of a blood pump in a closed circuit. Main features
of the treatment would include (A) hand of septic
patient, (B) blood removed from artery, (C) arterial
pressure monitor, (D) inflow sampling to detect BATs
titer before processing, (E) heparin pump (to prevent
clotting), (F) peristaltic blood pump, (G) pressure
monitor indicating outflow pressure from the blood
pump, and (H) BPVAC, the central component of the
treatment, designed to trap and immobilize BATs from
infected blood. BATs would adhere to BATs-antibodies,
and hence, would be trapped inside the column. (I)
pressure monitor indicates outflow pressure from BPVAC,
(J) air detector and air trap, (K) outflow sampling to
monitor BATs titer by appropriate serological tests, and
(L) detoxified blood returns to the vein. All tubing and
BPVAC would be applied aseptically; however, they are
single-use and would be properly disposed of after
treatment.
Abbreviations: BPVAC, bacterial polyvalent antibody-
column; BATs, bacterial antigens and their toxins.
Use of BPVAC as an auxiliary therapy along with conventional
treatments would improve the therapy outcome since:
1) BPVAC diminishes BATs in blood and minimizes the duration of their
contact with internal vital organs and
2) when BPVAC is used, the major titer of BATs in blood would be
depleted rapidly, and hence, the efficacy of conventional treatments,
especially antibiotic therapies, would enhance.
Such a dual therapy may decrease sepsis side effects.