ANGELES UNIVERSITY Vs ANGELES CITY G.R. No. 189999

You might also like

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 1

G.R. No.

189999               June 27, 2012

ANGELES UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION, Petitioner,


vs.
CITY OF ANGELES, JULIET G. QUINSAAT, in her capacity as Treasurer of Angeles City and
ENGR. DONATO N. DIZON, in his capacity as Acting Angeles City Building
Official, Respondents.

VILLARAMA, JR., J.:

FACTS

Angeles University, a non-stock and non-profit educational institution applied for a building permit for
the construction of its 11-storey building. The city building office then issued permit fee to the
University, which the latter paid under protest. The University later sought for the refund of paid fees
claiming that they are exempted from such fee which they considered as taxes in reliance to Sec. 8
of RA 6055, which exempts institutions such as the Angeles university from taxes.

ISSUE

Is the university correct in claiming its exemption from payment of building permit fees?

RULING

NO, The university is not exempted from payment of building permit fees.

In distinguishing tax and regulation as a form of police power, the determining factor is the purpose
of the implemented measure. If the purpose is primarily to raise revenue, then it will be deemed a tax
even though the measure results in some form of regulation. On the other hand, if the purpose is
primarily to regulate, then it is deemed a regulation and an exercise of the police power of the state,
even though incidentally, revenue is generated.

Concededly, in the case of building permit fees imposed by the National Government under
the National Building Code, revenue is incidentally generated for the benefit of local government
units.

Sec 8 of RA 6055 indeed exempts the university from imposition of taxes, however, building permit
fees are not taxes but regulatory fees which the university is not exempted.

You might also like