Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 10 views

    CREW v. Sec. of Education Et Al (Formerly CREW V. Sec. Margaret Spellings, Now CREW V. Sec. Arne Duncan) : 3/14/2007 - Motion To Stay

    Uploaded by

    CREW
    On December 7, 2006, Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW) filed a lawsuit against the U.S. Department of Education (DOE) and the Secretary of Education Margaret Spellings in the District court for the District of Columbia. The lawsuit is based on DOE's failure to release certain records required by law to be made public. Those records include the activities of advisory panels created under the Reading First Initiative, which was set up by the No Child Left Behind Act. CREW's complaint alleges that DOE failed to comply with any of the provisions of the Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA), which requires agencies using panels such as those implemented by the Reading First Initiative to conduct open meetings, make records of those meetings publicly available, and ensure that any recommendation of the panels is the result of a fairly balanced panel. The panel sets up under the Reading First Initiative make recommendations to the Secretary about which states should receive federal funds under the program. In a report issued in September 2006, DOE's Inspector General found that the Reading First Initiative was plagued by conflicts of interest, possible corruption, and numerous violations of law and General Accounting Office (GAO) standards.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    CREW v. Sec. of Education Et Al (Formerly CREW V. Sec. Margaret Spellings, Now CREW V. Sec. Arne Duncan) : 3/14/2007 - Motion To Stay

    Uploaded by

    CREW
    10 views9 pages
    On December 7, 2006, Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW) filed a lawsuit against the U.S. Department of Education (DOE) and the Secretary of Education Margaret Spellings in the District court for the District of Columbia. The lawsuit is based on DOE's failure to release certain records required by law to be made public. Those records include the activities of advisory panels created under the Reading First Initiative, which was set up by the No Child Left Behind Act. CREW's complaint alleges that DOE failed to comply with any of the provisions of the Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA), which requires agencies using panels such as those implemented by the Reading First Initiative to conduct open meetings, make records of those meetings publicly available, and ensure that any recommendation of the panels is the result of a fairly balanced panel. The panel sets up under the Reading First Initiative make recommendations to the Secretary about which states should receive federal funds under the program. In a report issued in September 2006, DOE's Inspector General found that the Reading First Initiative was plagued by conflicts of interest, possible corruption, and numerous violations of law and General Accounting Office (GAO) standards.

    Original Title

    CREW v. Sec. of Education et al (formerly CREW V. Sec. Margaret Spellings, now CREW V. Sec. Arne Duncan): 3/14/2007 - Motion to Stay

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    On December 7, 2006, Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW) filed a lawsuit against the U.S. Department of Education (DOE) and the Secretary of Education Margaret Spellings in the District court for the District of Columbia. The lawsuit is based on DOE's failure to release certain records required by law to be made public. Those records include the activities of advisory panels created under the Reading First Initiative, which was set up by the No Child Left Behind Act. CREW's complaint alleges that DOE failed to comply with any of the provisions of the Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA), which requires agencies using panels such as those implemented by the Reading First Initiative to conduct open meetings, make records of those meetings publicly available, and ensure that any recommendation of the panels is the result of a fairly balanced panel. The panel sets up under the Reading First Initiative make recommendations to the Secretary about which states should receive federal funds under the program. In a report issued in September 2006, DOE's Inspector General found that the Reading First Initiative was plagued by conflicts of interest, possible corruption, and numerous violations of law and General Accounting Office (GAO) standards.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf or txt
    10 views9 pages

    CREW v. Sec. of Education Et Al (Formerly CREW V. Sec. Margaret Spellings, Now CREW V. Sec. Arne Duncan) : 3/14/2007 - Motion To Stay

    Uploaded by

    CREW
    On December 7, 2006, Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW) filed a lawsuit against the U.S. Department of Education (DOE) and the Secretary of Education Margaret Spellings in the District court for the District of Columbia. The lawsuit is based on DOE's failure to release certain records required by law to be made public. Those records include the activities of advisory panels created under the Reading First Initiative, which was set up by the No Child Left Behind Act. CREW's complaint alleges that DOE failed to comply with any of the provisions of the Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA), which requires agencies using panels such as those implemented by the Reading First Initiative to conduct open meetings, make records of those meetings publicly available, and ensure that any recommendation of the panels is the result of a fairly balanced panel. The panel sets up under the Reading First Initiative make recommendations to the Secretary about which states should receive federal funds under the program. In a report issued in September 2006, DOE's Inspector General found that the Reading First Initiative was plagued by conflicts of interest, possible corruption, and numerous violations of law and General Accounting Office (GAO) standards.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf or txt
    of 9

    Case 1:06-cv-02086-HHK Document 6 Filed 03/14/2007 Page 1 of 9

    Case 1:06-cv-02086-HHK Document 6 Filed 03/14/2007 Page 2 of 9


    Case 1:06-cv-02086-HHK Document 6 Filed 03/14/2007 Page 3 of 9
    Case 1:06-cv-02086-HHK Document 6 Filed 03/14/2007 Page 4 of 9
    Case 1:06-cv-02086-HHK Document 6 Filed 03/14/2007 Page 5 of 9
    Case 1:06-cv-02086-HHK Document 6 Filed 03/14/2007 Page 6 of 9
    Case 1:06-cv-02086-HHK Document 6 Filed 03/14/2007 Page 7 of 9
    Case 1:06-cv-02086-HHK Document 6 Filed 03/14/2007 Page 8 of 9
    Case 1:06-cv-02086-HHK Document 6 Filed 03/14/2007 Page 9 of 9

    You might also like