Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Section 1 21
Section 1 21
Section 1 21
VI. As to whether they are open to the public or not * Pwede bang incorporator ka at stockholder at the
Close Corporation- limited to selected person or same time? YES
members of a family * Lahat ba ng stockholder incorporator? NO
3 Basic Characteristics
Stockholder should not exceed 20 All incorporators are stockholders
There is a restriction in transfer of shares- di Not all stockholders are incorporators
pwedeng ibenta yung share sa public
The shares cannot also be sold at the stock Section 6- Classification of Shares
exchange Doctrine of Equality of Shares
Open Corporation- open to the public (the public can All shares are presumed to be equal.
buy the shares)
Partnership the presumption of the contribution is
VII. As to their relation to another corporation equal
Parent or holding corporation- majority of directors
controlling the subsidiary corporation. Section 13 wala na tinanggal na. For purposes of
Subsidiary Corporation- related to another corporation increase in capital stock kaya ididiscuss. In
that the majority of its directors can be elected either, consonance in the increase of capital stock not because
directly or indirectly, by such other corporation. of incompliance with Section 13
VIII. As to whether they are corporations in a true Capital Stock- total number of shares of the
sense or only in a limited sense corporation
True Corporation- exists by statutory authority or Authorized Capital Stock- pag inapproved ng
grant SEC
Quasi-Corporation- no legislative grant Subscribed Capital Stock- 25% of the
Authorized Capital Stock
Quasi-Public Corporation Paid-up Capital Stock- 25% of the SCS
Franchise/ contract- given by congress (there Unissued Capital Stock- portion not yet issued
is a contract between the government and the to the public
corporation) Outstanding Capital Stock- defined under 137
Public duties for profit in the former law and in present under 173.
Quasi-Corporation Example: ACS is 100,000
No legislative grant (no franchise) SCS- 25,000- minimum di pwedeng
Not a corporation in its full sense bumaba otherwise it is a de facto corporation.
PCS- 6,250- minimum pweden tumaas pero
Section 4- Corporations created by special laws or bawal bumaba
charters UCS- 75,000
General Incorporation Law- RA 11232 (batas mismo, Minimum Capital of Corporation- 5,000
lahat ng corporation dito created) Cooperative Capital- 15,000
These are under the old law
This is only for purposes of power. Kasi sa * Can par value and no par value exist? YES
power may increase of Capital Stock. * Pwede bang yung shares lahat ay no par value? NO
walang bibili ng share mop ag ganon
* Wala ng minimum Paid-up Capital Stock at
Subscribed Capital Stock ngayon. (wala ng 2. Voting- bumoboto for election of BOD (shares na
requirement) pwedeng bumoto)
Non-Voting- GR di sila bumoboto (shares na di
Capital pwedeng bumoto)
Actual property of the corporation- could be E- under ASIMID Instances- they can vote under these
building, land instances
Fluctuate yung value (nagdedepreciate) Amendment of the Articles
Belongs to the corporation Amendment of the by laws
Can be Real or Personal Property Sale, lease, exchange, mortgage
Incurring creating, increasing bonded
Capital Stock indebtedness
Something which is abstract Merger or consolidation
Amount fixed Investment of Corporate funds
When issued it belongs to the Stockholders Dissolution of the corporation
Always Personal Property (kaya nga share)
* Ang shares pwede lahat voting pero di pwede yung
Shares of Stock- management/ profit/ asset (MPA) lahat non-voting kasi walang mag-eelect ng BOD
Pag ikaw ay isang stockholder may part ka sa * Pwede bang voting and non-voting? YES they can
management you can vote. may share sa profit co-exist
– dividend and may share sa left over ng
assets of the corporation. The mere fact that 3. Common- all shares are presumed to be equal
you are a stockholder. Preferred- there are certain privileges (rights to
Characteristics of the Shares of Stock dividend, preference sa voting rights and sa assets at
1. Personal/Movable Property the time of dissolution)
2. Intangible Property
3. Does not constitute an indebtedness on the part of 4. Promotion- Binibigay sa promoter (the person
the corporation convincing his incorporators to incorporate)
Founders- Incorporators (privilege the right to vote
Shares of Stock and to be elected for the period of 5 years)
Constitutes the interest (may share ka at
ownership sa corporation) 5. Share in Escrow (in trust)/ Escrow Stock
Intangible Example: ABC corporation nag-issue kay Pedro ng
Can be issued even if it is not yet fully paid share. Problema si Pedro di pa nya bayad yung share.
Certificate of Stock Habang di nya bayad, hawag ni Juan yung share ni
Written evidence Pedro for in trust. For the benefit of Pedro in the event
Tangible that Pedro will be able to pay, then that is the time that
Must be fully paid before iissue Juan will give the share to Pedro.
* Kailangan pa ba ang CoS para tawagin akong
stockholder? NO because the mere fact na 6. Convertible- pwedeng common or preferred and
nagsubscribed ka, you are considered as a stockholder vice versa
even though you did not pay.
* Can you issue a share of stock even though it is not 7. Redeemable v. Treasury- both are acquired by the
yet fully paid? YES corporation
* Can you issue a certificate of stock even though it is
not yet fully paid? NO because of the Doctrine of 8. Watered Stock- VOID
Individuality of Subscription (Di pwedeng iissue Law 1- Absolutely Simulated Contract
yung CoS unless it is fully paid) Characteristics
Sabi ng SEC, it is considered on1, whole, Walang bayad, kulang ang bayad ibinigay ang
indivisible contract share. Ibinigay ang certificate of stock. VOID
Anong tawag sa stock na ibinigay pero walang
Classes of Shares bayad o kulang ang bayad? Watered Stock
1. Par Value- nakalagay yung amount sa face ng
certificate of stock 9. Over-issued/ Spurious stock (fake)
No Par Value- di nakalagay yung stated value pero 100,000 is the ACS. Nag-issue ng 100,000
merong issued price ( no less than 5 peso)
10. Original/ Formative- number of shares from the Delinquent
beginning
Section 7- Founders’ Shares
11. Increased- pag itinaas ang share Exclusive right to vote and be voted for
5 years limitation (duration of the founders’
Statutory restrictions regarding the issuance of no shares)
par shares (5) Approval of SEC is required\
Batas mismo ang nagsasabi na bawal o kaya
may restriction Redeemable
1. Entities not allowed to issue no par shares (7) The stipulation is needed para maging
Bank redeemable
Trust Companies Di kailangan ang Unrestricted Retained
Insurance Companies Earning (URE)
Building and Loan Association * Ano yung stock na pwedeng bilhin ng corporation
Preened Companies kahit walang URE? Redeemable
Public Utilities
Other corporations authorized to obtain or Treasury
access funds from the public Di kailangang yung stipulation
Educational corporation are allowed Kailangan ang Unresricted Retain Earnings
2. All preferred shares has stated par value- Why? * Similarity parehas nirereacquire ng corporation
How can you compute the preference as to dividends,
voting rights if there is no stated par value. Section 8- Redeemable shares
No voting rights and no need for Unrestricted
3. No par- fully paid, non-assessable, not liable for Retained Earnings
corporate creditors (basic characteristics of no par) These are the shares reacquired by the
corporation with a stipulation that it can be
* Saan applicable ang Trust Fund Doctrine? Par reacquired notwithstanding with the absence
Value of URE
Retroactive- corporations existing prior to February Whether you are an OPC or an Ordinary
23, 2019 Corporation there is no minimum CS
GR- perpetual (the law has no maximum Is there a minimum capital stock requirement?
period) NONE
E- They have chosen Fixed Is there a minimum paid up capital stock
Vote- Majority of the Outstanding Capital requirement? NONE
Stock Is there is a percentage requirement? YES
Period to decide- 2 years (from February 23, * Before there was a minimum paid up under Section
2019, they have 2 years to decide what have 13- 5,000
they chosen for those corporation which are
existing. They can choose perpetual or a Cooperative- there is a minimum paid up capital
corporation with a fixed term.) stock.
Effect of violation (not distinguishable) Effects if * If the corporation has met all the requirements is it a
your name is found not to be distinguishable discretionary or ministerial act on the part of the SEC
SEC will summarily order- without an to issue? Ministerial that is the reason why you can
opponent, the SEC with its own initiative can fila a case for Mandamus if the corporation still
issue: refuses to issue the COI
1. Cease and desist order (SEC is
telling you not to use the corporate Section 19- De Facto Corporation
name) De Jure- all the legal requirements have been met so it
2. Removal of all visible signages is a valid corporation
3. Fails to comply- cited for contempt De Facto- one some or maybe or some of the
(damages amounting to P30,000) requirements have not been complied
4. Administratively/Criminally liable
5. Revoke the COI Requisites of De Facto Corporation
If it is distinguishable 1. Valid law- RA 11232
The SEC will allow you to file the AOI
2. Attempt to incorporate/organize- the corporation Section 20- Corporation by Estoppel
has filed the name verification, file the articles De Jure- complied all the legal requirements (legal)
3. Actual user of the corporate power- the corporation De Facto- has the AOI and COI but it failed to satisfy
has elected the BOD, elected the officers and file the 1 or some of the requirements under the law so it can
by-laws (operating) be subjected to a Quo Warranto Proceeding
4. Issuance of COI despite of the non-compliance with Corporation by Estoppel- No AOI, no COI basically
the legal requirements it is not a corporation
Effect of corporation by estoppel- persons
* De Facto does it have articles? YES comprising it are liable as a general partner (up to
* Does it have certificate? YES but the problem was the extent of their separate property)
issued but there is something violated.
Some Reasons why we are going to declare the Legitimate Corporation- Stockholders are not liable
corporation as a de facto up to the extent of their separate property (trust fund
Corporate name resembles, it is not doctrine)
distinguishable
Forgery in the articles Ostensible corporation/estoppel-
Citizenship Can you evade your liability or use it as a
Percentage Requirement defense that you are a corporation by estoppel
De Jure and De facto so that you will not become liable? NO
Technically they are the same because you Provided, however, That when any such
apply all the principle in de facto subject only ostensible corporation is sued on any
to the one exception. transaction entered by its as a corporation or
on any tort committed by it as such, it shall
Remedy against De Facto- Quo Warranto not be allowed to use on any its lack of
(questioning the legal existence of the corporation) corporate personality as a defense. Anyone
Example: A case was filed against ABS-CBN who assumes an obligation to an ostensible
questioning its legal existence (Quo-Warranto). corporation as such cannot resist performance
Solicitor general was questioning the existence of thereof on the ground that there was in fact no
ABS-CBN corporation.
Quo Warranto- filed against De Facto Example 1: I’m a corporation by estoppel can
corporation and only the solicitor general can I use that as a defense? NO
file Example 2: Suppose a TP transacted to me
and I’m a corporation by estoppel. Can the TP
Direct Attack evade the liability? NO
Directly questioning the legal existence of the
corporation. Section 21- Effects of Non-use of Corporate
The direct attack is the quo warranto Charter and Continuous Inoperation
proceeding to be filed by the solgen Non-Use- form the start (issuance of certificate by
Collateral Attack SEC), it becomes a perpetual corporation
ABC corporation (de facto) and Pedro. ABC Did not do anything
extended a loan to Pedro. Pedro does not want What if in a period of 5 years, it did not elect
to pay because it is a de facto corporation. the BOD, did not elect the officers and did not
Indirect because even though ABC is a de file the by-laws?
facto corporation, it is only the solicitor Deemed Revoked- the corporation is dissolve
general who can file the case. Anyone (COI will be revoked)
questioning the legal existence, which is not a Continuous Inoperation- What if during the 5-year
quo warranto proceeding, which is not filed by period they were able to elect the BOD and officers
the solicitor general is a collateral attack. and filed the by-laws. All of a sudden they cease to
Not allowed against a de facto corporation. operate. It is possible in the first year of operation they
did something and later on, stop doing it.
* If you are De Jure, you cannot be subjected to a Did something but afterwards for a period of 5
direct or a collateral attack. But if you are De Facto years they stopped operation
corporation, can you be subjected to a collateral Placed under delinquent status for 2 years
attack? NO. To a direct attack? YES- Quo warranto (extension for you to operate)
If compliant- order will be lifted (it is
De Facto- has COI but there is a violation now again a valid corporation)
Corporation by estoppel- No articles, no certificate If not compliant- the revocation of
but it is operating as if it is a corporation. COI will happen
Old Revised Cooperative
Non- Use 2 years 5 years 2 years
Continuous 5 years 5 years 2 years
Mandamus Quo-Warranto
* Compelling the performance * Questioning the
of an act legal existence of the
Example: The SEC does not corporation. It is a
like to issue the COI, the direct attack filed by
corporation does not allow the the Solicitor
stockholder to examine the General.
books or allow the stockholder
to attend the meeting.
* Non-use (5 years) * Continuous
inoperation (5 years)
Section 16 PD 902- A