Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Design of A Hybrid Directional Coupler in Empty Substrate Integrated Waveguide (ESIW)
Design of A Hybrid Directional Coupler in Empty Substrate Integrated Waveguide (ESIW)
I. INTRODUCTION
1531-1309 © 2015 IEEE. Personal use is permitted, but republication/redistribution requires IEEE permission.
See http://www.ieee.org/publications_standards/publications/rights/index.html for more information.
FERNANDEZ et al.: DESIGN OF A HYBRID DIRECTIONAL COUPLER IN ESIW 797
(1)
is 0.083 dB at the central frequency. Regarding the power-split and low-cost than classical waveguides. Therefore, ESIW
unbalance, the measurements show differences below 0.5 dB, devices, like the proposed hybrid, are a good option whenever
except for scarce peaks that arrive at a maximum difference of conditions of space, low-weight, low-cost, low-losses, high
0.7 dB; and about the phase-shift, the results are among 86 quality factor, high frequency and integration have to be taken
and 94 , so in both parameters the measurements are very close into account.
to the simulations and the design requirements. The causes for
these deviations among the simulated and measured values are IV. CONCLUSION
due to losses in the real material, tolerances of the manufac-
turing process and especially the inherent deviations in the mea- The first 4-port device in ESIW technology has been de-
surement procedure due to the fact of using a two-port ana- scribed in this letter. The design constraints of the proposed
lyzer and the consequent reflections introduced by the respec- hybrid directional coupler have been stated and the circuit has
tive loads at the unconnected ports. Taking these causes into been simulated, manufactured and measured. The results show
account, it can be stated that the response of the real device that this real device accomplishes the imposed characteristics,
matches with that of a typical hybrid circuit in the whole band- accepting the differences between the simulated and measured
width from 13 to 17 GHz. values of the S-parameters that are within the manufacturing
To compare and contrast the proposed circuit in ESIW, tolerance limits. Comparing equivalent designs of this hybrid
the equivalent circuits [5] in SIW –using the same substrate in ESIW, SIW and classical waveguides, the ESIW circuit
Rogers-4003C as in ESIW–and classical waveguide–using a is revealed as a promising candidate if limits about volume,
standard WR-62–have been simulated in CST Studio consid- weight, losses and cost are considered.
ering only the stand-alone circuits without transitions. The The realization and validation of this circuit proves again the
ESIW hybrid is not as compact as the equivalent in SIW due feasibility of the ESIW technology and initiates the path for the
to the absence of dielectric, but fabrication tolerances have a design of the full suite of useful devices in ESIW.
greater impact in SIW devices due to the smaller dimensions
and due to the substrate permittivity [2], and even more, this REFERENCES
effect is aggravated as the frequency increases; on the other [1] D. Deslandes and K. Wu, “Integrated microstrip and rectangular wave-
hand, the ESIW circuit has the same footprint as the equivalent guide in planar form,” IEEE Microw. Wireless Compon. Lett., vol. 11,
in classical waveguide, but with a very small height. Regarding no. 2, pp. 68–70, Feb. 2001.
[2] A. Belenguer, H. Esteban, and V. Boria, “Novel empty substrate inte-
the losses, the best is the classical waveguide circuit with grated waveguide for high-performance MICROWAVE integrated cir-
0.055 dB of insertion loss, followed by the ESIW hybrid with cuits,” IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Tech., vol. 62, no. 4, pp. 832–839,
0.083 dB, and then the SIW circuit with 0.304 dB. ESIW cir- Apr. 2014.
[3] S. Cohn and R. Levy, “History of MICROWAVE passive COMPO-
cuits are planar low-cost, like SIW ones, in comparison with the NENTS with particular attention to directional couplers,” IEEE Trans.
high-cost of manufacturing classical waveguides. Regarding Microw. Theory Tech., vol. MTT-32, no. 9, pp. 1046–1054, Sep. 1984.
the quality factor, where applicable, the ESIW technology [4] H. Riblet, “The short-slot hybrid junction,” Proc. IRE, vol. 40, pp.
180–184, Feb. 1952.
achieves values 4.5 times higher than the equivalent SIW [5] K. Murai, H. Ikeuchi, T. Kawai, M. Kishihara, and I. Ohta, “Broadband
designs [2]. As a stand-alone component, this circuit presents design method of SIW directional couplers,” in Proc. China-Japan
good performance indexes, better than the equivalent SIW Joint Microw. Conf. (CJMW’11), Apr. 2011, pp. 1–4.
[6] A. Eldridge and V. Price, The Stanford Two-Mile Accelerator. New
circuit, which is more compact but with higher insertion loss; York: W. A. Benjamin Inc., 1968, ch. 11–Waveguides, pp. 364–371.
but if this is used within a larger structure, specially if filters [7] J. Hirokawa and M. Ando, Advanced Millimeter-Wave Technologies.
are also present, the whole ESIW structure would be much New York: Wiley, 2009, ch. 6–Planar Waveguide-Type Slot Arrays, pp.
256–259.
better regarding low-losses and high quality factor than SIW, [8] K. Toda, I. Ohta, and M. Kishihara, “H-plane crossed-waveguide hy-
and much better regarding total volume and weight, integration brids,” in Proc. 36th Eur. Microw. Conf., 2006, pp. 987–990.