Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 90

CERVICAL CANCER

SCREENING UPDATES

Carolyn R. Zalameda-Castro, MD
INTRODUCTION

• Cervical cancer screening started with the


use of the pap test

Feldman S, Goodman A, Peipert JF. Screening for cervical cancer. UpToDate.


www.uptodate.com. March 15, 2018.
INTRODUCTION

• Cervical cancer screening started with the


use of the pap test
• HPV testing

Feldman S, Goodman A, Peipert JF. Screening for cervical cancer. UpToDate.


www.uptodate.com. March 15, 2018.
INTRODUCTION

• Cervical cancer screening started with the


use of the pap test
• HPV testing
• Visual inspection with acetic acid (VIA)
especially in low-resource settings where
either pap test or HPV testing are not
available or are too costly
Feldman S, Goodman A, Peipert JF. Screening for cervical cancer. UpToDate.
www.uptodate.com. March 15, 2018.
INTRODUCTION
Debate about a lot of issues surrounding cervical
cancer screening
• whom to screen
• how often should screening be done
• which among the available screening modalities
is the best one
• when should screening end
CERVICAL CANCER SCREENING GUIDELINES

A. 2012 ACS-ASCCP-ASCP Screening Guidelines for the


Prevention and Early Detection of Cervical Cancer
B. 2012 PSCPC Clinical Practice Guidelines
C. 2015 SGO and ASCCP Interim Clinical Guidelines on the
Use of Primary HPV Testing
D. 2016 ASCO Resource-Stratified Clinical Practice Guidelines
on Secondary Prevention of Cervical Cancer

E. Philippine Department of Health and Philhealth


CERVICAL CANCER SCREENING GUIDELINES

A. 2012 ACS-ASCCP-ASCP Screening Guidelines for the


Prevention and Early Detection of Cervical Cancer
B. 2012 PSCPC Clinical Practice Guidelines
C. 2015 SGO and ASCCP Interim Clinical Guidelines on the
Use of Primary HPV Testing
D. 2016 ASCO Resource-Stratified Clinical Practice Guidelines
on Secondary Prevention of Cervical Cancer

E. Philippine Department of Health


2012 ACS-ASCCP-ASCP
Screening Guidelines

Saslo w D , So lo m o n D , Law so n H W , K illacke y M , K u lasin gam SL, C ain J, G arcia FA R , M o riarty A T, W axm an A G , W ilb u r D C , W e n tze n se n N , D o w n s LS
Jr, Sp itze r M , M o scicki A B , Fran co EL, Sto le r M H , Sch iffm an M , C astle PE, M ye rs ER . A m e rican C an ce r So cie ty, A m e rical So cie ty fo r C o lp o sco p y an d
C e rvical Path o lo gy an d A m e rican So cie ty fo r C lin ical Path o lo gy Scre e n in g G u id e lin e s fo r th e Pre ve n tio n an d Early D e te ctio n o f C e rvical C an ce r.
2012 ACS-ASCCP-ASCP
Screening Guidelines
When does screening for cervical cancer start?

At the age of 21 years and not earlier


regardless of age of sexual debut or
presence of risk factors for the disease.
Saslo w D , So lo m o n D , Law so n H W , K illacke y M , K u lasin gam SL, C ain J, G arcia FA R , M o riarty A T, W axm an A G , W ilb u r D C , W e n tze n se n N , D o w n s LS
Jr, Sp itze r M , M o scicki A B , Fran co EL, Sto le r M H , Sch iffm an M , C astle PE, M ye rs ER . A m e rican C an ce r So cie ty, A m e rical So cie ty fo r C o lp o sco p y an d
C e rvical Path o lo gy an d A m e rican So cie ty fo r C lin ical Path o lo gy Scre e n in g G u id e lin e s fo r th e Pre ve n tio n an d Early D e te ctio n o f C e rvical C an ce r.
2012 ACS-ASCCP-ASCP
Screening Guidelines
Why?

• Cervical cancer is very rare in women less than 21yo.

• The presence of premalignant diseases of the cervix in


young women have very high probability of spontaneous
resolution.

Saslo w D , So lo m o n D , Law so n H W , K illacke y M , K u lasin gam SL, C ain J, G arcia FA R , M o riarty A T, W axm an A G , W ilb u r D C , W e n tze n se n N , D o w n s LS
Jr, Sp itze r M , M o scicki A B , Fran co EL, Sto le r M H , Sch iffm an M , C astle PE, M ye rs ER . A m e rican C an ce r So cie ty, A m e rical So cie ty fo r C o lp o sco p y an d
C e rvical Path o lo gy an d A m e rican So cie ty fo r C lin ical Path o lo gy Scre e n in g G u id e lin e s fo r th e Pre ve n tio n an d Early D e te ctio n o f C e rvical C an ce r.
2012 ACS-ASCCP-ASCP
Screening Guidelines
Focus should be on primary prevention
• Vaccination against HPV
• education
• lifestyle and behavioral modification

Saslo w D , So lo m o n D , Law so n H W , K illacke y M , K u lasin gam SL, C ain J, G arcia FA R , M o riarty A T, W axm an A G , W ilb u r D C , W e n tze n se n N , D o w n s LS
Jr, Sp itze r M , M o scicki A B , Fran co EL, Sto le r M H , Sch iffm an M , C astle PE, M ye rs ER . A m e rican C an ce r So cie ty, A m e rical So cie ty fo r C o lp o sco p y an d
C e rvical Path o lo gy an d A m e rican So cie ty fo r C lin ical Path o lo gy Scre e n in g G u id e lin e s fo r th e Pre ve n tio n an d Early D e te ctio n o f C e rvical C an ce r.
2012 ACS-ASCCP-ASCP
Screening Guidelines
Age group Recommendation Comments

Saslo w D , So lo m o n D , Law so n H W , K illacke y M , K u lasin gam SL, C ain J, G arcia FA R , M o riarty A T, W axm an A G , W ilb u r D C , W e n tze n se n N , D o w n s LS
Jr, Sp itze r M , M o scicki A B , Fran co EL, Sto le r M H , Sch iffm an M , C astle PE, M ye rs ER . A m e rican C an ce r So cie ty, A m e rical So cie ty fo r C o lp o sco p y an d
C e rvical Path o lo gy an d A m e rican So cie ty fo r C lin ical Path o lo gy Scre e n in g G u id e lin e s fo r th e Pre ve n tio n an d Early D e te ctio n o f C e rvical C an ce r.
2012 ACS-ASCCP-ASCP
Screening Guidelines
Age group Recommendation Comments
No added benefit in screening more
21-29 y.o. Cytology every 3 years
often and in adding HPV testing

Saslo w D , So lo m o n D , Law so n H W , K illacke y M , K u lasin gam SL, C ain J, G arcia FA R , M o riarty A T, W axm an A G , W ilb u r D C , W e n tze n se n N , D o w n s LS
Jr, Sp itze r M , M o scicki A B , Fran co EL, Sto le r M H , Sch iffm an M , C astle PE, M ye rs ER . A m e rican C an ce r So cie ty, A m e rical So cie ty fo r C o lp o sco p y an d
C e rvical Path o lo gy an d A m e rican So cie ty fo r C lin ical Path o lo gy Scre e n in g G u id e lin e s fo r th e Pre ve n tio n an d Early D e te ctio n o f C e rvical C an ce r.
2012 ACS-ASCCP-ASCP
Screening Guidelines
Age group Recommendation Comments
No added benefit in screening more
21-29 y.o. Cytology every 3 years
often and in adding HPV testing
Co-testing every 5 years
Addition of HPV DNA testing to
30-65 y.o. cervical cytology increases the
(Acceptable) Cytology alone every 3
detection of prevalent CIN3 & AIS
years

Saslo w D , So lo m o n D , Law so n H W , K illacke y M , K u lasin gam SL, C ain J, G arcia FA R , M o riarty A T, W axm an A G , W ilb u r D C , W e n tze n se n N , D o w n s LS
Jr, Sp itze r M , M o scicki A B , Fran co EL, Sto le r M H , Sch iffm an M , C astle PE, M ye rs ER . A m e rican C an ce r So cie ty, A m e rical So cie ty fo r C o lp o sco p y an d
C e rvical Path o lo gy an d A m e rican So cie ty fo r C lin ical Path o lo gy Scre e n in g G u id e lin e s fo r th e Pre ve n tio n an d Early D e te ctio n o f C e rvical C an ce r.
2012 ACS-ASCCP-ASCP
Screening Guidelines
Age group Recommendation Comments
No added benefit in screening more
21-29 y.o. Cytology every 3 years
often and in adding HPV testing
Co-testing every 5 years
Addition of HPV DNA testing to
30-65 y.o. cervical cytology increases the
(Acceptable) Cytology alone every 3
detection of prevalent CIN3 & AIS
years
Discontinued when
• without history of at least a CIN 2 Not be restarted even if a woman
> 65 y.o.
disease has a new sexual partner
• prior negative screening results

Saslo w D , So lo m o n D , Law so n H W , K illacke y M , K u lasin gam SL, C ain J, G arcia FA R , M o riarty A T, W axm an A G , W ilb u r D C , W e n tze n se n N , D o w n s LS
Jr, Sp itze r M , M o scicki A B , Fran co EL, Sto le r M H , Sch iffm an M , C astle PE, M ye rs ER . A m e rican C an ce r So cie ty, A m e rical So cie ty fo r C o lp o sco p y an d
C e rvical Path o lo gy an d A m e rican So cie ty fo r C lin ical Path o lo gy Scre e n in g G u id e lin e s fo r th e Pre ve n tio n an d Early D e te ctio n o f C e rvical C an ce r.
2012 ACS-ASCCP-ASCP
Screening Guidelines
Age group Recommendation Comments
No added benefit in screening more
21-29 y.o. Cytology every 3 years
often and in adding HPV testing
Co-testing every 5 years
Addition of HPV DNA testing to
30-65 y.o. cervical cytology increases the
(Acceptable) Cytology alone every 3
detection of prevalent CIN3
years
Discontinued when
• without history of at least a CIN 2 Not be restarted even if a woman
> 65 y.o.
disease has a new sexual partner
• prior negative screening results
No screening needed if
Screening for vaginal cancer is not
Post- hysterectomy done for a benign
cost-effective nor beneficial due to
hysterectomy disease and no history of CIN 2+
Saslo w D , So lo m o n D , Law so n H W , K illacke y M , K u lasin gam SL, C ain J, G arcia FA R , M o riarty A T, W axm an A G , W ilb u r D C , W e n tze n se n N , D o w n s LS

the rarity of the disease


Jr, Sp itze r M , M o scicki A B , Fran co EL, Sto le r M H , Sch iffm an M , C astle PE, M ye rs ER . A m e rican C an ce r So cie ty, A m e rical So cie ty fo r C o lp o sco p y an d
C e rvical Path o lo gy an d A m e rican So cie ty fo r C lin ical Path o lo gy Scre e n in g G u id e lin e s fo r th e Pre ve n tio n an d Early D e te ctio n o f C e rvical C an ce r.
disease
2012 ACS-ASCCP-ASCP
Screening Guidelines
When do we NOT stop screening?

üIf with history of CIN 2, CIN 3 or AIS

üContinue “routine screening” for at least 20 years, even if this


extends past age 65 years.

Saslo w D , So lo m o n D , Law so n H W , K illacke y M , K u lasin gam SL, C ain J, G arcia FA R , M o riarty A T, W axm an A G , W ilb u r D C , W e n tze n se n N , D o w n s LS
Jr, Sp itze r M , M o scicki A B , Fran co EL, Sto le r M H , Sch iffm an M , C astle PE, M ye rs ER . A m e rican C an ce r So cie ty, A m e rical So cie ty fo r C o lp o sco p y an d
C e rvical Path o lo gy an d A m e rican So cie ty fo r C lin ical Path o lo gy Scre e n in g G u id e lin e s fo r th e Pre ve n tio n an d Early D e te ctio n o f C e rvical C an ce r.
2012 ACS-ASCCP-ASCP
Screening Guidelines
Do we need to screen women who have
already been vaccinated against HPV?

Screening recommendations for vaccinated


women follow the age-specific screening
recommendations

Saslo w D , So lo m o n D , Law so n H W , K illacke y M , K u lasin gam SL, C ain J, G arcia FA R , M o riarty A T, W axm an A G , W ilb u r D C , W e n tze n se n N , D o w n s LS
Jr, Sp itze r M , M o scicki A B , Fran co EL, Sto le r M H , Sch iffm an M , C astle PE, M ye rs ER . A m e rican C an ce r So cie ty, A m e rical So cie ty fo r C o lp o sco p y an d
C e rvical Path o lo gy an d A m e rican So cie ty fo r C lin ical Path o lo gy Scre e n in g G u id e lin e s fo r th e Pre ve n tio n an d Early D e te ctio n o f C e rvical C an ce r.
CERVICAL CANCER SCREENING GUIDELINES

A. 2012 ACS-ASCCP-ASCP Screening Guidelines for the


Prevention and Early Detection of Cervical Cancer
B. 2012 PSCPC Clinical Practice Guidelines
C. 2015 SGO and ASCCP Interim Clinical Guidelines on the
Use of Primary HPV Testing
D. 2016 ASCO Resource-Stratified Clinical Practice Guidelines
on Secondary Prevention of Cervical Cancer

E. Philippine Department of Health


2012 PSCPC Clinical Practice
Guidelines

Philippine Society for Cervical Pathology and Colposcopy Clinical Practice


Guidelines on Cervical Cancer Screening. September 2012.
2012 PSCPC Clinical Practice
Guidelines

The Philippine Society of Cervical Pathology and


Colposcopy (PSCPC) advocates initiation of
cervical cancer screening at the age of 21 years.

Philippine Society for Cervical Pathology and Colposcopy Clinical Practice


Guidelines on Cervical Cancer Screening. September 2012.
2012 PSCPC Clinical Practice
Guidelines
Age group Recommendation Comments

Philippine Society for Cervical Pathology and Colposcopy Clinical Practice


Guidelines on Cervical Cancer Screening. September 2012.
2012 PSCPC Clinical Practice
Guidelines
Age group Recommendation Comments
Conventional cytology: annually Due to high burden of cervical CA and
21-29 y.o. Liquid-based cytology (LBC): every 2 low sensitivity of conventional pap
years smear in the local setting

Philippine Society for Cervical Pathology and Colposcopy Clinical Practice


Guidelines on Cervical Cancer Screening. September 2012.
2012 PSCPC Clinical Practice
Guidelines
Age group Recommendation Comments
Conventional cytology: annually
21-29 y.o. Liquid-based cytology (LBC): every 2
years Due to high burden of cervical CA and
low sensitivity of conventional pap
Conventional cytology: annually smear in the local setting
30-65 y.o. LBC: every 2 years
Co-testing with HPV every 5 years

Philippine Society for Cervical Pathology and Colposcopy Clinical Practice


Guidelines on Cervical Cancer Screening. September 2012.
2012 PSCPC Clinical Practice
Guidelines
Age group Recommendation Comments
Conventional cytology: annually
21-29 y.o. Liquid-based cytology (LBC): every 2
years Due to high burden of cervical CA and
low sensitivity of conventional pap
Conventional cytology: annually smear in the local setting
30-65 y.o. LBC: every 2 years
Co-testing with HPV every 5 years
Conventional cytology: annually Due to the high rate of cervical cancer
> 65 y.o. LBC: every 2 years in women greater than 65 years old in
Co-testing with HPV every 5 years the country

Philippine Society for Cervical Pathology and Colposcopy Clinical Practice


Guidelines on Cervical Cancer Screening. September 2012.
2012 PSCPC Clinical Practice
Guidelines
Age group Recommendation Comments
Conventional cytology: annually
21-29 y.o. Liquid-based cytology (LBC): every 2
years Due to high burden of cervical CA and
low sensitivity of conventional pap
Conventional cytology: annually smear in the local setting
30-65 y.o. LBC: every 2 years
Co-testing with HPV every 5 years
Conventional cytology: annually Due to the high rate of cervical cancer
> 65 y.o. LBC: every 2 years in women greater than 65 years old in
Co-testing with HPV every 5 years the country
Post- If done for a benign condition and with
No further screening no history of CIN2 or greater lesion
hysterectomy

Philippine Society for Cervical Pathology and Colposcopy Clinical Practice


Guidelines on Cervical Cancer Screening. September 2012.
CERVICAL CANCER SCREENING GUIDELINES

A. 2012 ACS-ASCCP-ASCP Screening Guidelines for the


Prevention and Early Detection of Cervical Cancer
B. 2012 PSCPC Clinical Practice Guidelines
C. 2015 SGO and ASCCP Interim Clinical Guidelines on the
Use of Primary HPV Testing
D. 2016 ASCO Resource-Stratified Clinical Practice Guidelines
on Secondary Prevention of Cervical Cancer

E. Philippine Department of Health and Philhealth


2015 SGO and ASCCP Interim
Clinical Guidelines on the Use of
Primary HPV Testing
üHPV testing alone as a primary screening
modality for cervical cancer in women 25
years and above.

üThey recommend screening every 3 years if


initial result is negative.
Huh WK, Ault KA, Chelmow D, et al. Use of primary high-risk human papillomavirus testing
for cervical cancer screening: interim clinical guidance. Obstet Gynecol 2015; 125:330.
2015 SGO and ASCCP Interim
Clinical Guidelines on the Use of
Primary HPV Testing

üsupported by ACOG with their guidelines released in 2016

üACOG further recommended discontinuation of screening


at age 65 years if previous screening results are all
negative

Huh WK, Ault KA, Chelmow D, et al. Use of primary high-risk human papillomavirus testing
for cervical cancer screening: interim clinical guidance. Obstet Gynecol 2015; 125:330.
2015 SGO and ASCCP Interim
Clinical Guidelines on the Use of
Primary HPV Testing
ATHENA (Addressing the Need for Advanced HPV
Diagnostics) Study:

“HPV testing as a primary screening modality was 28.3%


more sensitive in detecting CIN 3+ in women 25-29 years
and 28.3% more in women ≥30 years old compared to
cytology”
Wright TC, Stoler M H, Behrens CM et al. Primary cervical cancer screening with human papillomavirus:
end of study results from the ATHENA study using HPV as the first-line screening test. Gynecol Oncol 2014;
2015 SGO and ASCCP Interim
Clinical Guidelines on the Use of
Primary HPV Testing
ATHENA (Addressing the Need for Advanced HPV
Diagnostics) Study:

Limitations:
1. Follow-up of patients is only 3 years with a significant
number of participants getting lost to follow-up
2. The rigorous study design may not really be applicable or
feasible in the clinical setting
Wright TC, Stoler M H, Behrens CM et al. Primary cervical cancer screening with human papillomavirus:
end of study results from the ATHENA study using HPV as the first-line screening test. Gynecol Oncol 2014;
CERVICAL CANCER SCREENING GUIDELINES

A. 2012 ACS-ASCCP-ASCP Screening Guidelines for the


Prevention and Early Detection of Cervical Cancer
B. 2012 PSCPC Clinical Practice Guidelines
C. 2015 SGO and ASCCP Interim Clinical Guidelines on the
Use of Primary HPV Testing
D. 2016 ASCO Resource-Stratified Clinical Practice
Guidelines on Secondary Prevention of Cervical Cancer

E. Philippine Department of Health


2016 ASCO Resource-Stratified Clinical
Practice Guidelines on Secondary
Prevention of Cervical Cancer

Because of the disparity in the


provision of primary prevention
and mass screening both
among and within countries,
ASCO came up with a
resource-stratified CPG.
Jeronimo J, Castle PE, Temin S et al. Secondary prevention of cervical cancer: ASCO resource-stratified
clinical practice guideline. J Glob Oncol 2016; Oct 12, 3(5): 635-57. doi: 10.1200/JGO.2016.006577.
eCollection 2017 Oct.
2016 ASCO Resource-Stratified Clinical
Practice Guidelines on Secondary
Prevention of Cervical Cancer
4-Tiered Resource Settings
for Secondary Prevention Maximal-
Enhanced- resource
resource settings
Limited-
resource settings
Basic-
resource settings
settings
Jeronimo J, Castle PE, Temin S et al. Secondary prevention of cervical cancer: ASCO resource-stratified
clinical practice guideline. J Glob Oncol 2016; Oct 12, 3(5): 635-57. doi: 10.1200/JGO.2016.006577.
eCollection 2017 Oct.
2016 ASCO Resource-StratifiedMass Clinical
screening
Practice Guidelines on Secondary available to the entire
target population,
Prevention of Cervical Cancer
Most programs in urban
covering ≥80% of
women 25-70 yo
areas of middle-income
Rural areas in countries
middle-income
No mass screening
countries Maximal-
and no culture of
Enhanced- resource
screening
resource settings
Limited-
resource settings
Basic-
resource settings
settings
Jeronimo J, Castle PE, Temin S et al. Secondary prevention of cervical cancer: ASCO resource-stratified
clinical practice guideline. J Glob Oncol 2016; Oct 12, 3(5): 635-57. doi: 10.1200/JGO.2016.006577.
eCollection 2017 Oct.
2016 ASCO Resource-Stratified Clinical
Practice Guidelines on Secondary
Prevention of Cervical Cancer

Maximal-
Enhanced- resource
resource settings
Limited-
resource settings
In the Philippines, screening
Basic- is opportunistic and less
resource settings than 10% only of eligible
women have had at least
settings one pap smear
Jeronimo J, Castle PE, Temin S et al. Secondary prevention of cervical cancer: ASCO resource-stratified
clinical practice guideline. J Glob Oncol 2016; Oct 12, 3(5): 635-57. doi: 10.1200/JGO.2016.006577.
eCollection 2017 Oct.
2016 ASCO Resource-Stratified Clinical
Practice Guidelines on Secondary
Prevention of Cervical Cancer
Recommendation: BASIC-RESOURCE SETTING

Either HPV DNA testing or visual inspection with acetic


acid (VIA) as primary screening modality for women 30 to
49 years old, one to three times per lifetime.

Jeronimo J, Castle PE, Temin S et al. Secondary prevention of cervical cancer: ASCO resource-stratified
clinical practice guideline. J Glob Oncol 2016; Oct 12, 3(5): 635-57. doi: 10.1200/JGO.2016.006577.
eCollection 2017 Oct.
CERVICAL CANCER SCREENING GUIDELINES

A. 2012 ACS-ASCCP-ASCP Screening Guidelines for the


Prevention and Early Detection of Cervical Cancer
B. 2012 PSCPC Clinical Practice Guidelines
C. 2015 SGO and ASCCP Interim Clinical Guidelines on the
Use of Primary HPV Testing
D. 2016 ASCO Resource-Stratified Clinical Practice Guidelines
on Secondary Prevention of Cervical Cancer

E. Philippine Department of Health


Philippine Department of Health

Advocate the use of VIA in the Single Visit


Approach (SVA) to women 25-55 years old
especially at the community primary health centers

They advise to continue using pap smear in


facilities and hospitals where these laboratories are
in place and have capabilities for their maintenance.
Banzon EP, Ngelangel CA, Fajutrao LB et al. For an organized cervical cancer screening program in the
Philippines – http://the Health Policy Brief. Healthpolicy-brief-cervical-cancer-screening-philippines
Saslo w D , So lo m o n D , Law so n H W , K illacke y M , K u lasin gam SL, C ain J, G arcia FA R , M o riarty A T, W axm an A G , W ilb u r D C , W e n tze n se n N , D o w n s LS Jr,
Sp itze r M , M o scicki A B , Fran co EL, Sto le r M H , Sch iffm an M , C astle PE, M ye rs ER . A m e rican C an ce r So cie ty, A m e rical So cie ty fo r C o lp o sco p y an d
C e rvical Path o lo gy an d A m e rican So cie ty fo r C lin ical Path o lo gy Scre e n in g G u id e lin e s fo r th e Pre ve n tio n an d Early D e te ctio n o f C e rvical C an ce r.
Jo u rn a l o f Lo w er G en ita l Tra ct D isea se V o l 1 6 N u m b e r 3 , 2 0 1 2 , 1 -2 9 .
MANAGEMENT OF
ABNORMAL SCREENING TESTS

Saslo w D , So lo m o n D , Law so n H W , K illacke y M , K u lasin gam SL, C ain J, G arcia FA R , M o riarty A T, W axm an A G , W ilb u r D C , W e n tze n se n N , D o w n s LS Jr,
Sp itze r M , M o scicki A B , Fran co EL, Sto le r M H , Sch iffm an M , C astle PE, M ye rs ER . A m e rican C an ce r So cie ty, A m e rical So cie ty fo r C o lp o sco p y an d
C e rvical Path o lo gy an d A m e rican So cie ty fo r C lin ical Path o lo gy Scre e n in g G u id e lin e s fo r th e Pre ve n tio n an d Early D e te ctio n o f C e rvical C an ce r.
Jo u rn a l o f Lo w er G en ita l Tra ct D isea se V o l 1 6 N u m b e r 3 , 2 0 1 2 , 1 -2 9 .
MANAGEMENT OF
ABNORMAL SCREENING TESTS

Based on 2012 ACS-ASCCP-ASCP Screening


Guidelines for the Prevention and Early Detection
of Cervical Cancer

Saslo w D , So lo m o n D , Law so n H W , K illacke y M , K u lasin gam SL, C ain J, G arcia FA R , M o riarty A T, W axm an A G , W ilb u r D C , W e n tze n se n N , D o w n s LS Jr,
Sp itze r M , M o scicki A B , Fran co EL, Sto le r M H , Sch iffm an M , C astle PE, M ye rs ER . A m e rican C an ce r So cie ty, A m e rical So cie ty fo r C o lp o sco p y an d
C e rvical Path o lo gy an d A m e rican So cie ty fo r C lin ical Path o lo gy Scre e n in g G u id e lin e s fo r th e Pre ve n tio n an d Early D e te ctio n o f C e rvical C an ce r.
Jo u rn a l o f Lo w er G en ita l Tra ct D isea se V o l 1 6 N u m b e r 3 , 2 0 1 2 , 1 -2 9 .
UNSATISFACTORY CYTOLOGY

Photo from WHO International Agency for Research on Cancer


Saslo w D , So lo m o n D , Law so n H W , K illacke y M , K u lasin gam SL, C ain J, G arcia FA R , M o riarty A T, W axm an A G , W ilb u r D C , W e n tze n se n N , D o w n s LS Jr,
Sp itze r M , M o scicki A B , Fran co EL, Sto le r M H , Sch iffm an M , C astle PE, M ye rs ER . A m e rican C an ce r So cie ty, A m e rical So cie ty fo r C o lp o sco p y an d
C e rvical Path o lo gy an d A m e rican So cie ty fo r C lin ical Path o lo gy Scre e n in g G u id e lin e s fo r th e Pre ve n tio n an d Early D e te ctio n o f C e rvical C an ce r.
Jo u rn a l o f Lo w er G en ita l Tra ct D isea se V o l 1 6 N u m b e r 3 , 2 0 1 2 , 1 -2 9 .
UNSATISFACTORY CYTOLOGY

≤ 1% across all types of preparation

Unreliable for detecting epithelial


abnormalities

Most common causes:


• obscuring blood
• inflammation
• presence of mucus or atrophy
Photo from WHO International Agency for Research on Cancer
• insufficient squamous cells (LBC)
Saslo w D , So lo m o n D , Law so n H W , K illacke y M , K u lasin gam SL, C ain J, G arcia FA R , M o riarty A T, W axm an A G , W ilb u r D C , W e n tze n se n N , D o w n s LS Jr,
Sp itze r M , M o scicki A B , Fran co EL, Sto le r M H , Sch iffm an M , C astle PE, M ye rs ER . A m e rican C an ce r So cie ty, A m e rical So cie ty fo r C o lp o sco p y an d
C e rvical Path o lo gy an d A m e rican So cie ty fo r C lin ical Path o lo gy Scre e n in g G u id e lin e s fo r th e Pre ve n tio n an d Early D e te ctio n o f C e rvical C an ce r.
Jo u rn a l o f Lo w er G en ita l Tra ct D isea se V o l 1 6 N u m b e r 3 , 2 0 1 2 , 1 -2 9 .
UNSATISFACTORY CYTOLOGY

Repeat cytology in 2-4 months


Reflex HPV testing is not recommended but if co-testing is done
and HPV test is positive, doing colposcopy is also an acceptable
option.

Saslo w D , So lo m o n D , Law so n H W , K illacke y M , K u lasin gam SL, C ain J, G arcia FA R , M o riarty A T, W axm an A G , W ilb u r D C , W e n tze n se n N , D o w n s LS Jr,
Sp itze r M , M o scicki A B , Fran co EL, Sto le r M H , Sch iffm an M , C astle PE, M ye rs ER . A m e rican C an ce r So cie ty, A m e rical So cie ty fo r C o lp o sco p y an d
C e rvical Path o lo gy an d A m e rican So cie ty fo r C lin ical Path o lo gy Scre e n in g G u id e lin e s fo r th e Pre ve n tio n an d Early D e te ctio n o f C e rvical C an ce r.
Jo u rn a l o f Lo w er G en ita l Tra ct D isea se V o l 1 6 N u m b e r 3 , 2 0 1 2 , 1 -2 9 .
UNSATISFACTORY CYTOLOGY
HPV unknown HPV negative HPV positive
(any age) (age≥30) (age≥30)

either is
acceptable
Repeat cytology
after 2-4 months Colposcopy

Negative Unsatisfactory
Abnormal

Routine screening (HPV-/ unknown) or


Manage per cotesting @ 1year (HPV+)
ASCCP guidelines
Saslo w D , So lo m o n D , Law so n H W , K illacke y M , K u lasin gam SL, C ain J, G arcia FA R , M o riarty A T, W axm an A G , W ilb u r D C , W e n tze n se n N , D o w n s LS Jr,
Sp itze r M , M o scicki A B , Fran co EL, Sto le r M H , Sch iffm an M , C astle PE, M ye rs ER . A m e rican C an ce r So cie ty, A m e rical So cie ty fo r C o lp o sco p y an d
C e rvical Path o lo gy an d A m e rican So cie ty fo r C lin ical Path o lo gy Scre e n in g G u id e lin e s fo r th e Pre ve n tio n an d Early D e te ctio n o f C e rvical C an ce r.
Jo u rn a l o f Lo w er G en ita l Tra ct D isea se V o l 1 6 N u m b e r 3 , 2 0 1 2 , 1 -2 9 .
Cytology negative for intraepithelial
lesion or malignancy but absent or
insufficient endocervical cells

Saslo w D , So lo m o n D , Law so n H W , K illacke y M , K u lasin gam SL, C ain J, G arcia FA R , M o riarty A T, W axm an A G , W ilb u r D C , W e n tze n se n N , D o w n s LS Jr,
Sp itze r M , M o scicki A B , Fran co EL, Sto le r M H , Sch iffm an M , C astle PE, M ye rs ER . A m e rican C an ce r So cie ty, A m e rical So cie ty fo r C o lp o sco p y an d
C e rvical Path o lo gy an d A m e rican So cie ty fo r C lin ical Path o lo gy Scre e n in g G u id e lin e s fo r th e Pre ve n tio n an d Early D e te ctio n o f C e rvical C an ce r.
Jo u rn a l o f Lo w er G en ita l Tra ct D isea se V o l 1 6 N u m b e r 3 , 2 0 1 2 , 1 -2 9 .
Cytology negative for intraepithelial
lesion or malignancy but absent or
insufficient endocervical cells

Routine screening
• Occurs in about 10-20% especially in older women

• risk of development of CIN 3+ over time in women with this


result is comparable with those having satisfactory
endocervical cells or transformation zone component.

Saslo w D , So lo m o n D , Law so n H W , K illacke y M , K u lasin gam SL, C ain J, G arcia FA R , M o riarty A T, W axm an A G , W ilb u r D C , W e n tze n se n N , D o w n s LS Jr,
Sp itze r M , M o scicki A B , Fran co EL, Sto le r M H , Sch iffm an M , C astle PE, M ye rs ER . A m e rican C an ce r So cie ty, A m e rical So cie ty fo r C o lp o sco p y an d
C e rvical Path o lo gy an d A m e rican So cie ty fo r C lin ical Path o lo gy Scre e n in g G u id e lin e s fo r th e Pre ve n tio n an d Early D e te ctio n o f C e rvical C an ce r.
Jo u rn a l o f Lo w er G en ita l Tra ct D isea se V o l 1 6 N u m b e r 3 , 2 0 1 2 , 1 -2 9 .
CYTOLOGY NEGATIVE, HPV POSITIVE
≥ 30 YEARS OLD

Saslo w D , So lo m o n D , Law so n H W , K illacke y M , K u lasin gam SL, C ain J, G arcia FA R , M o riarty A T, W axm an A G , W ilb u r D C , W e n tze n se n N , D o w n s LS Jr,
Sp itze r M , M o scicki A B , Fran co EL, Sto le r M H , Sch iffm an M , C astle PE, M ye rs ER . A m e rican C an ce r So cie ty, A m e rical So cie ty fo r C o lp o sco p y an d
C e rvical Path o lo gy an d A m e rican So cie ty fo r C lin ical Path o lo gy Scre e n in g G u id e lin e s fo r th e Pre ve n tio n an d Early D e te ctio n o f C e rvical C an ce r.
Jo u rn a l o f Lo w er G en ita l Tra ct D isea se V o l 1 6 N u m b e r 3 , 2 0 1 2 , 1 -2 9 .
CYTOLOGY NEGATIVE, HPV POSITIVE
≥ 30 YEARS OLD
• Despite negative cytology, women with oncogenic
HPV are at higher risk for later CIN 3+ than women
with negative HPV tests

• Persistent HPV increases risk further

• Most HPV infections are cleared allowing observation


for clearance
Saslo w D , So lo m o n D , Law so n H W , K illacke y M , K u lasin gam SL, C ain J, G arcia FA R , M o riarty A T, W axm an A G , W ilb u r D C , W e n tze n se n N , D o w n s LS Jr,
Sp itze r M , M o scicki A B , Fran co EL, Sto le r M H , Sch iffm an M , C astle PE, M ye rs ER . A m e rican C an ce r So cie ty, A m e rical So cie ty fo r C o lp o sco p y an d
C e rvical Path o lo gy an d A m e rican So cie ty fo r C lin ical Path o lo gy Scre e n in g G u id e lin e s fo r th e Pre ve n tio n an d Early D e te ctio n o f C e rvical C an ce r.
Jo u rn a l o f Lo w er G en ita l Tra ct D isea se V o l 1 6 N u m b e r 3 , 2 0 1 2 , 1 -2 9 .
CYTOLOGY NEGATIVE, HPV POSITIVE
≥ 30 YEARS OLD
Repeat co-testing HPV Genotyping
after one year

(-) HPV 16, 18 (+) HPV 16, 18


Negative results ≥ ASC or Co-testing COLPOSCOPY
HPV (+)
Co-testing after after 1 year
3 years COLPOSCOPY

Saslo w D , So lo m o n D , Law so n H W , K illacke y M , K u lasin gam SL, C ain J, G arcia FA R , M o riarty A T, W axm an A G , W ilb u r D C , W e n tze n se n N , D o w n s LS Jr,
Sp itze r M , M o scicki A B , Fran co EL, Sto le r M H , Sch iffm an M , C astle PE, M ye rs ER . A m e rican C an ce r So cie ty, A m e rical So cie ty fo r C o lp o sco p y an d
C e rvical Path o lo gy an d A m e rican So cie ty fo r C lin ical Path o lo gy Scre e n in g G u id e lin e s fo r th e Pre ve n tio n an d Early D e te ctio n o f C e rvical C an ce r.
Jo u rn a l o f Lo w er G en ita l Tra ct D isea se V o l 1 6 N u m b e r 3 , 2 0 1 2 , 1 -2 9 .
ASCUS
Atypical Squamous Cells of Undetermined Significance

Photo from Blaustein’s Pathology of the Female Genital Tract, 6th ed. (2011)
Saslo w D , So lo m o n D , Law so n H W , K illacke y M , K u lasin gam SL, C ain J, G arcia FA R , M o riarty A T, W axm an A G , W ilb u r D C , W e n tze n se n N , D o w n s LS Jr,
Sp itze r M , M o scicki A B , Fran co EL, Sto le r M H , Sch iffm an M , C astle PE, M ye rs ER . A m e rican C an ce r So cie ty, A m e rical So cie ty fo r C o lp o sco p y an d
C e rvical Path o lo gy an d A m e rican So cie ty fo r C lin ical Path o lo gy Scre e n in g G u id e lin e s fo r th e Pre ve n tio n an d Early D e te ctio n o f C e rvical C an ce r.
Jo u rn a l o f Lo w er G en ita l Tra ct D isea se V o l 1 6 N u m b e r 3 , 2 0 1 2 , 1 -2 9 .
ASCUS
Atypical Squamous Cells of Undetermined Significance

• Most common cytologic


abnormality

• About 1/3 to 2/3 of cases are not


associated with HPV
• Carries lowest risk of CIN 3+

• reflex HPV testing followed by


colposcopy for HPV-positive
Photo from Blaustein’s Pathology of the Female Genital Tract, 6th ed. (2011) women preferred
Saslo w D , So lo m o n D , Law so n H W , K illacke y M , K u lasin gam SL, C ain J, G arcia FA R , M o riarty A T, W axm an A G , W ilb u r D C , W e n tze n se n N , D o w n s LS Jr,
Sp itze r M , M o scicki A B , Fran co EL, Sto le r M H , Sch iffm an M , C astle PE, M ye rs ER . A m e rican C an ce r So cie ty, A m e rical So cie ty fo r C o lp o sco p y an d
C e rvical Path o lo gy an d A m e rican So cie ty fo r C lin ical Path o lo gy Scre e n in g G u id e lin e s fo r th e Pre ve n tio n an d Early D e te ctio n o f C e rvical C an ce r.
Jo u rn a l o f Lo w er G en ita l Tra ct D isea se V o l 1 6 N u m b e r 3 , 2 0 1 2 , 1 -2 9 .
ASCUS
HPV Testing Repeat cytology
after 1 year

(-) for High (+) for High


Risk Types Risk Types Negative result ≥ ASC
Co-testing COLPOSCOPY Routine COLPOSCOPY
after 3 years screening

Saslo w D , So lo m o n D , Law so n H W , K illacke y M , K u lasin gam SL, C ain J, G arcia FA R , M o riarty A T, W axm an A G , W ilb u r D C , W e n tze n se n N , D o w n s LS Jr,
Sp itze r M , M o scicki A B , Fran co EL, Sto le r M H , Sch iffm an M , C astle PE, M ye rs ER . A m e rican C an ce r So cie ty, A m e rical So cie ty fo r C o lp o sco p y an d
C e rvical Path o lo gy an d A m e rican So cie ty fo r C lin ical Path o lo gy Scre e n in g G u id e lin e s fo r th e Pre ve n tio n an d Early D e te ctio n o f C e rvical C an ce r.
Jo u rn a l o f Lo w er G en ita l Tra ct D isea se V o l 1 6 N u m b e r 3 , 2 0 1 2 , 1 -2 9 .
LSIL
Low-grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesion

Photo from Blaustein’s Pathology of the Female Genital Tract, 6th ed. (2011)
Saslo w D , So lo m o n D , Law so n H W , K illacke y M , K u lasin gam SL, C ain J, G arcia FA R , M o riarty A T, W axm an A G , W ilb u r D C , W e n tze n se n N , D o w n s LS Jr,
Sp itze r M , M o scicki A B , Fran co EL, Sto le r M H , Sch iffm an M , C astle PE, M ye rs ER . A m e rican C an ce r So cie ty, A m e rical So cie ty fo r C o lp o sco p y an d
C e rvical Path o lo gy an d A m e rican So cie ty fo r C lin ical Path o lo gy Scre e n in g G u id e lin e s fo r th e Pre ve n tio n an d Early D e te ctio n o f C e rvical C an ce r.
Jo u rn a l o f Lo w er G en ita l Tra ct D isea se V o l 1 6 N u m b e r 3 , 2 0 1 2 , 1 -2 9 .
LSIL
No HPV test Positive HPV test Negative HPV test

Repeat co-testing
COLPOSCOPY after 1 year
(PREFERRED)

Negative results
Routine
screening
Saslo w D , So lo m o n D , Law so n H W , K illacke y M , K u lasin gam SL, C ain J, G arcia FA R , M o riarty A T, W axm an A G , W ilb u r D C , W e n tze n se n N , D o w n s LS Jr,
Sp itze r M , M o scicki A B , Fran co EL, Sto le r M H , Sch iffm an M , C astle PE, M ye rs ER . A m e rican C an ce r So cie ty, A m e rical So cie ty fo r C o lp o sco p y an d
C e rvical Path o lo gy an d A m e rican So cie ty fo r C lin ical Path o lo gy Scre e n in g G u id e lin e s fo r th e Pre ve n tio n an d Early D e te ctio n o f C e rvical C an ce r.
Jo u rn a l o f Lo w er G en ita l Tra ct D isea se V o l 1 6 N u m b e r 3 , 2 0 1 2 , 1 -2 9 .
ASCUS or LSIL
in women 21-24 years

ASCUS: Reflex
REPEAT HPV testing
CYTOLOGY
AFTER 1 YEAR
Negative result Positive result
Routine Repeat cytology
screening after 1 year

Saslo w D , So lo m o n D , Law so n H W , K illacke y M , K u lasin gam SL, C ain J, G arcia FA R , M o riarty A T, W axm an A G , W ilb u r D C , W e n tze n se n N , D o w n s LS Jr,
Sp itze r M , M o scicki A B , Fran co EL, Sto le r M H , Sch iffm an M , C astle PE, M ye rs ER . A m e rican C an ce r So cie ty, A m e rical So cie ty fo r C o lp o sco p y an d
C e rvical Path o lo gy an d A m e rican So cie ty fo r C lin ical Path o lo gy Scre e n in g G u id e lin e s fo r th e Pre ve n tio n an d Early D e te ctio n o f C e rvical C an ce r.
Jo u rn a l o f Lo w er G en ita l Tra ct D isea se V o l 1 6 N u m b e r 3 , 2 0 1 2 , 1 -2 9 .
LSIL
in pregnant women

Postponing
COLPOSCOPY colposcopy 6
weeks postpartum
*Endocervical (ACCEPTABLE)
curettage is totally
unacceptable

Saslo w D , So lo m o n D , Law so n H W , K illacke y M , K u lasin gam SL, C ain J, G arcia FA R , M o riarty A T, W axm an A G , W ilb u r D C , W e n tze n se n N , D o w n s LS Jr,
Sp itze r M , M o scicki A B , Fran co EL, Sto le r M H , Sch iffm an M , C astle PE, M ye rs ER . A m e rican C an ce r So cie ty, A m e rical So cie ty fo r C o lp o sco p y an d
C e rvical Path o lo gy an d A m e rican So cie ty fo r C lin ical Path o lo gy Scre e n in g G u id e lin e s fo r th e Pre ve n tio n an d Early D e te ctio n o f C e rvical C an ce r.
Jo u rn a l o f Lo w er G en ita l Tra ct D isea se V o l 1 6 N u m b e r 3 , 2 0 1 2 , 1 -2 9 .
ASC-H
Atypical Squamous Cells: Cannot Exclude High-Grade SIL

• ASC-H confers higher risk for CIN 3+ over time than ASC-US or
LSIL, although lower than that following HSIL.

• There is high rate of HPV detection in women with ASC-H making


reflex HPV testing unsuitable.

Saslo w D , So lo m o n D , Law so n H W , K illacke y M , K u lasin gam SL, C ain J, G arcia FA R , M o riarty A T, W axm an A G , W ilb u r D C , W e n tze n se n N , D o w n s LS Jr,
Sp itze r M , M o scicki A B , Fran co EL, Sto le r M H , Sch iffm an M , C astle PE, M ye rs ER . A m e rican C an ce r So cie ty, A m e rical So cie ty fo r C o lp o sco p y an d
C e rvical Path o lo gy an d A m e rican So cie ty fo r C lin ical Path o lo gy Scre e n in g G u id e lin e s fo r th e Pre ve n tio n an d Early D e te ctio n o f C e rvical C an ce r.
Jo u rn a l o f Lo w er G en ita l Tra ct D isea se V o l 1 6 N u m b e r 3 , 2 0 1 2 , 1 -2 9 .
ASC-H
Atypical Squamous Cells: Cannot Exclude High-Grade SIL

COLPOSCOPY
*Regardless of age/HPV status

Saslo w D , So lo m o n D , Law so n H W , K illacke y M , K u lasin gam SL, C ain J, G arcia FA R , M o riarty A T, W axm an A G , W ilb u r D C , W e n tze n se n N , D o w n s LS Jr,
Sp itze r M , M o scicki A B , Fran co EL, Sto le r M H , Sch iffm an M , C astle PE, M ye rs ER . A m e rican C an ce r So cie ty, A m e rical So cie ty fo r C o lp o sco p y an d
C e rvical Path o lo gy an d A m e rican So cie ty fo r C lin ical Path o lo gy Scre e n in g G u id e lin e s fo r th e Pre ve n tio n an d Early D e te ctio n o f C e rvical C an ce r.
Jo u rn a l o f Lo w er G en ita l Tra ct D isea se V o l 1 6 N u m b e r 3 , 2 0 1 2 , 1 -2 9 .
HSIL
High-grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesion

Photo from Blaustein’s Pathology of the Female Genital Tract, 6th ed.
(2011)
Saslo w D , So lo m o n D , Law so n H W , K illacke y M , K u lasin gam SL, C ain J, G arcia FA R , M o riarty A T, W axm an A G , W ilb u r D C , W e n tze n se n N , D o w n s LS Jr,
Sp itze r M , M o scicki A B , Fran co EL, Sto le r M H , Sch iffm an M , C astle PE, M ye rs ER . A m e rican C an ce r So cie ty, A m e rical So cie ty fo r C o lp o sco p y an d
C e rvical Path o lo gy an d A m e rican So cie ty fo r C lin ical Path o lo gy Scre e n in g G u id e lin e s fo r th e Pre ve n tio n an d Early D e te ctio n o f C e rvical C an ce r.
Jo u rn a l o f Lo w er G en ita l Tra ct D isea se V o l 1 6 N u m b e r 3 , 2 0 1 2 , 1 -2 9 .
HSIL
High-grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesion

Risk for CIN 3 is from 29-50%


depending on the HPV status,
while that of cervical cancer is 7%
regardless of the HPV status

Photo from Blaustein’s Pathology of the Female Genital Tract, 6th ed.
(2011)
Saslo w D , So lo m o n D , Law so n H W , K illacke y M , K u lasin gam SL, C ain J, G arcia FA R , M o riarty A T, W axm an A G , W ilb u r D C , W e n tze n se n N , D o w n s LS Jr,
Sp itze r M , M o scicki A B , Fran co EL, Sto le r M H , Sch iffm an M , C astle PE, M ye rs ER . A m e rican C an ce r So cie ty, A m e rical So cie ty fo r C o lp o sco p y an d
C e rvical Path o lo gy an d A m e rican So cie ty fo r C lin ical Path o lo gy Scre e n in g G u id e lin e s fo r th e Pre ve n tio n an d Early D e te ctio n o f C e rvical C an ce r.
Jo u rn a l o f Lo w er G en ita l Tra ct D isea se V o l 1 6 N u m b e r 3 , 2 0 1 2 , 1 -2 9 .
HSIL

Colposcopy with Immediate loop


endocervical electrosurgical
assessment excision procedure
(LEEP)*
*not acceptable in 21-24 years
and in pregnant women

Saslo w D , So lo m o n D , Law so n H W , K illacke y M , K u lasin gam SL, C ain J, G arcia FA R , M o riarty A T, W axm an A G , W ilb u r D C , W e n tze n se n N , D o w n s LS Jr,
Sp itze r M , M o scicki A B , Fran co EL, Sto le r M H , Sch iffm an M , C astle PE, M ye rs ER . A m e rican C an ce r So cie ty, A m e rical So cie ty fo r C o lp o sco p y an d
C e rvical Path o lo gy an d A m e rican So cie ty fo r C lin ical Path o lo gy Scre e n in g G u id e lin e s fo r th e Pre ve n tio n an d Early D e te ctio n o f C e rvical C an ce r.
Jo u rn a l o f Lo w er G en ita l Tra ct D isea se V o l 1 6 N u m b e r 3 , 2 0 1 2 , 1 -2 9 .
AGC
Atypical Glandular Cells

Photo from Blaustein’s Pathology of the Female Genital Tract, 6th ed.
(2011)
Saslo w D , So lo m o n D , Law so n H W , K illacke y M , K u lasin gam SL, C ain J, G arcia FA R , M o riarty A T, W axm an A G , W ilb u r D C , W e n tze n se n N , D o w n s LS Jr,
Sp itze r M , M o scicki A B , Fran co EL, Sto le r M H , Sch iffm an M , C astle PE, M ye rs ER . A m e rican C an ce r So cie ty, A m e rical So cie ty fo r C o lp o sco p y an d
C e rvical Path o lo gy an d A m e rican So cie ty fo r C lin ical Path o lo gy Scre e n in g G u id e lin e s fo r th e Pre ve n tio n an d Early D e te ctio n o f C e rvical C an ce r.
Jo u rn a l o f Lo w er G en ita l Tra ct D isea se V o l 1 6 N u m b e r 3 , 2 0 1 2 , 1 -2 9 .
AGC
Atypical Glandular Cells

Associated with polyps, metaplasia,


adenocarcinoma of the
endometrium, ovary, fallopian tube
and other sites

The risk of CIN 3+ is about 9% in


women at least 30 years old while
the risk of cancer is 3%.
Photo from Blaustein’s Pathology of the Female Genital Tract, 6th ed.
(2011)
Saslo w D , So lo m o n D , Law so n H W , K illacke y M , K u lasin gam SL, C ain J, G arcia FA R , M o riarty A T, W axm an A G , W ilb u r D C , W e n tze n se n N , D o w n s LS Jr,
Sp itze r M , M o scicki A B , Fran co EL, Sto le r M H , Sch iffm an M , C astle PE, M ye rs ER . A m e rican C an ce r So cie ty, A m e rical So cie ty fo r C o lp o sco p y an d
C e rvical Path o lo gy an d A m e rican So cie ty fo r C lin ical Path o lo gy Scre e n in g G u id e lin e s fo r th e Pre ve n tio n an d Early D e te ctio n o f C e rvical C an ce r.
Jo u rn a l o f Lo w er G en ita l Tra ct D isea se V o l 1 6 N u m b e r 3 , 2 0 1 2 , 1 -2 9 .
AGC
All subcategories Atypical
except Atypical endometrial cells
endometrial cells
Endometrial and
Colposcopy with endocervical endocervical
sampling + endometrial sampling
sampling if ≥35yo or if with
risk factors for EM neoplasia No endometrial pathology
COLPOSCOPY
Saslo w D , So lo m o n D , Law so n H W , K illacke y M , K u lasin gam SL, C ain J, G arcia FA R , M o riarty A T, W axm an A G , W ilb u r D C , W e n tze n se n N , D o w n s LS Jr,
Sp itze r M , M o scicki A B , Fran co EL, Sto le r M H , Sch iffm an M , C astle PE, M ye rs ER . A m e rican C an ce r So cie ty, A m e rical So cie ty fo r C o lp o sco p y an d
C e rvical Path o lo gy an d A m e rican So cie ty fo r C lin ical Path o lo gy Scre e n in g G u id e lin e s fo r th e Pre ve n tio n an d Early D e te ctio n o f C e rvical C an ce r.
Jo u rn a l o f Lo w er G en ita l Tra ct D isea se V o l 1 6 N u m b e r 3 , 2 0 1 2 , 1 -2 9 .
2015 SGO and ASCCP Interim
Clinical Guidelines on the Use of
Primary HPV testing

COLPOSCOPY
Abnormal HPV if abnormal pap
test Pap test
test

Feldman S, Goodman A, Peipert JF. Screening for cervical cancer. UpToDate.


www.uptodate.com. March 15, 2018.
2015 SGO and ASCCP Interim
Clinical Guidelines on the Use of
Primary HPV testing

High risk HPV Non-high risk HPV


types types

OUTRIGHT Pap Test


COLPOSCOPY

Feldman S, Goodman A, Peipert JF. Screening for cervical cancer. UpToDate.


www.uptodate.com. March 15, 2018.
2016 ASCO Resource-Stratified Clinical
Practice Guidelines on Secondary
Prevention of Cervical Cancer
HPV DNA IF POSITIVE
VIA
Testing
Negative result Positive
Cryotherapy
or LEEP

Follow up in 12 mos
Jeronimo J, Castle PE, Temin S et al. Secondary prevention of cervical cancer: ASCO resource-stratified
clinical practice guideline. J Glob Oncol 2016; Oct 12, 3(5): 635-57. doi: 10.1200/JGO.2016.006577.
2016 ASCO Resource-Stratified Clinical
Practice Guidelines on Secondary
Prevention of Cervical Cancer
VIA

Positive
Cryotherapy
or LEEP

Follow up in 12 mos
Jeronimo J, Castle PE, Temin S et al. Secondary prevention of cervical cancer: ASCO resource-stratified
clinical practice guideline. J Glob Oncol 2016; Oct 12, 3(5): 635-57. doi: 10.1200/JGO.2016.006577.
CERVICAL CANCER
SCREENING UPDATES
CERVICAL CANCER SCREENING GUIDELINES

A. 2012 ACS-ASCCP-ASCP Screening Guidelines for the


Prevention and Early Detection of Cervical Cancer
B. 2012 PSCPC Clinical Practice Guidelines
C. 2015 SGO and ASCCP Interim Clinical Guidelines on the
Use of Primary HPV Testing
D. 2016 ASCO Resource-Stratified Clinical Practice Guidelines
on Secondary Prevention of Cervical Cancer

E. Philippine Department of Health and Philhealth


REFERENCES

5. Committee on Practice Bulletins—Gynecology. Practice Bulletin No. 168: Cervical Cancer


Screening and Prevention. Obstet Gynecol 2016; 128:e111.

6. Wright TC, Stoler MH, Behrens CM et al. Primary cervical cancer screening with human
papillomavirus: end of study results from the ATHENA study using HPV as the first-line screening
test. Gynecol Oncol 2014; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2014.11.076.

7. Jeronimo J, Castle PE, Temin S et al. Secondary prevention of cervical cancer: ASCO resource-
stratified clinical practice guideline. J Glob Oncol 2016; Oct 12, 3(5): 635-57. doi:
10.1200/JGO.2016.006577. eCollection 2017 Oct.

8. Banzon EP, Ngelangel CA, Fajutrao LB et al. For an organized cervical cancer screening
program in the Philippines – http://the Health Policy Brief. Healthpolicy-brief-cervical-cancer-
screening-philippines
Thank you very much! J
Interactive Questions
1. Which statement is true based on the recommendations of
the Philippine Society of Cervical Pathology and Colposcopy
(PSCPC) for cervical cancer screening for Filipino women?
1. For women 21 years old and above, annual screening using conventional
cytology or every 3 years with liquid-based cytology is advised.
2. Screening is discontinued at the age of 65 years if there are three prior
Interactive Questions
normal Pap smear results.
3. Screening for vaginal cancer in women who had total hysterectomy for
benign conditions, except premalignant cervical lesions, is not
recommended.
4. Screening for women below 21 years is recommended if there is first coitus
within two years from menarche or if with one pregnancy prior to age 17.
1. Which statement is true based on the recommendations of
the Philippine Society of Cervical Pathology and Colposcopy
(PSCPC) for cervical cancer screening for Filipino women?
1. For women 21 years old and above, annual screening using conventional
cytology or every 3 years with liquid-based cytology is advised.
2. Screening is discontinued at the age of 65 years if there are three prior
Interactive Questions
normal Pap smear results.
3. Screening for vaginal cancer in women who had total hysterectomy for
benign conditions, except premalignant cervical lesions, is not
recommended.
4. Screening for women below 21 years is recommended if there is first coitus
within two years from menarche or if with one pregnancy prior to age 17.
2. A 32-year old G1P1(1001) comes in with an
unsatisfactory Pap smear result due to
obscuring blood. What will be the next step?

1. Repeat cytology
Interactive in 2-4 months
Questions
2. Do reflex HPV testing
3. Repeat cytology in 12 months
4. Proceed to colposcopy
2. A 32-year old G1P1(1001) comes in with an
unsatisfactory Pap smear result due to
obscuring blood. What will be the next step?

1. Repeat cytology
Interactive in 2-4 months
Questions
2. Do reflex HPV testing
3. Repeat cytology in 12 months
4. Proceed to colposcopy
3. On repeat cytology, the result turned out to
be ASCUS. What will be the preferred
management?

1. Repeat cytology
Interactive after 6 months
Questions
2. Repeat cytology after 12 months
3. Colposcopy
4. HPV DNA testing
3. On repeat cytology, the result turned out to
be ASCUS. What will be the preferred
management?

1. Repeat cytology
Interactive after 6 months
Questions
2. Repeat cytology after 12 months
3. Colposcopy
4. HPV DNA testing
4. A 51-year old G5P5 (5005) was referred to
your clinic due to a Pap smear result of HSIL.
What will you do next?

1. Immediate
Interactiveloop electrosurgical
Questions excision
(LEEP)
2. Colposcopy with endocervical assessment
3. HPV DNA testing
4. Either A or B
4. A 51-year old G5P5 (5005) was referred to
your clinic due to a Pap smear result of HSIL.
What will you do next?

1. Immediate
Interactiveloop electrosurgical
Questions excision
(LEEP)
2. Colposcopy with endocervical assessment
3. HPV DNA testing
4. Either A or B
5. Based on the 2016 ASCO Resource-Stratified Clinical
Practice Guidelines on Secondary Prevention of Cervical
Cancer, which among the following are appropriate
screening and treatment methods in our local setting?
1. Primary screening recommended is HPV DNA testing or VIA.
Interactive Questions
2. If VIA was the primary screening done and turned out positive,
outright treatment with either cryotherapy or LEEP is
advocated.
3. Women with negative triage result should be followed up in 12
months while those with positive result should receive
treatment then followed up after 1 year.
4. All of the above.
5. Based on the 2016 ASCO Resource-Stratified Clinical
Practice Guidelines on Secondary Prevention of Cervical
Cancer, which among the following are appropriate
screening and treatment methods in our local setting?
1. Primary screening recommended is HPV DNA testing or VIA.
Interactive Questions
2. If VIA was the primary screening done and turned out positive,
outright treatment with either cryotherapy or LEEP is
advocated.
3. Women with negative triage result should be followed up in 12
months while those with positive result should receive
treatment then followed up after 1 year.
4. All of the above.
THANK YOU!
REFERENCES

1. Feldman S, Goodman A, Peipert JF. Screening for cervical cancer. UpToDate.


www.uptodate.com. March 15, 2018.

2. Saslow D, Solomon D, Lawson HW, Killackey M, Kulasingam SL, Cain J, Garcia FAR, Moriarty
AT, Waxman AG, Wilbur DC, Wentzensen N, Downs LS Jr, Spitzer M, Moscicki AB, Franco EL,
Stoler MH, Schiffman M, Castle PE, Myers ER. American Cancer Society, Americal Society for
Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology and American Society for Clinical Pathology Screening
Guidelines for the Prevention and Early Detection of Cervical Cancer. Journal of Lower Genital
Tract Disease Vol 16 Number 3, 2012, 1-29.

3. Philippine Society for Cervical Pathology and Colposcopy Clinical Practice Guidelines on
Cervical Cancer Screening. September 2012.

4. Huh WK, Ault KA, Chelmow D, et al. Use of primary high-risk human papillomavirus testing for
cervical cancer screening: interim clinical guidance. Obstet Gynecol 2015; 125:330.

You might also like