Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Mam PDF
Mam PDF
Mam PDF
1
Outline
Background
Statement of the problems
Significance of the study
Objectives
Methodology
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Recommendations
Acknowledgements
2
1.1 BACK GROUND
The International Pharmaceutical Federation (FIP) in
1998, defined pharmaceutical care (PC) as the
“responsible provision of pharmacotherapy for the
purpose of achieving definite outcomes that improves
or maintains a patient’s quality of life”
This is a collaboration process between the
pharmacist and the patient who is aimed at preventing
or identifying and resolving drug and health related
problems (FIP,1998)I
3
CONT..
PC is key in pharmacy practice globally. This aims at providing a
better outcome for the patients And PC is one of those outcomes
For pharmacies to have high patronage, their service must be
attractive for patient inflow.
Patient satisfaction is likely to affect the image of the Pharmacist
and pharmacy profession
The need to track patient satisfaction in pharmaceutical
services is vital because level of satisfaction reflects the reality
of care, as well as the preferences and expectations of the
patient.
Therefore, it becomes important to evaluate the satisfaction
level of patients in face of the services offered by healthcare
professionals, once it can be used as an indicator of quality of
these services
4
Cont..
The observed satisfaction level becomes a useful
instrument; since by it, it might be possible to take
necessary corrective measures, aiming constant
improvement of the patient’s care.
5
1.2 Statement of the problem
Patient satisfaction with health services emerged to be
as an important indicator of quality of services
provided.
7
Cont..
8
1.3 Significance of the study
This study increase the awareness of pharmacists about patient’s
satisfaction value and how it could affect the pharmacotherapuetics
outcomes.
9
Cont..
The administrators of the Health Bureau may also utilize the
finding in taking administrative measure.
10
3.objective
General Objective
to assess Patients satisfaction in Pharmaceutical care and
associated factors at SABIYAN PRIMARY HOSPITAL (SPH)
Specific Objectives
To assess the extent of involvement of pharmacy personnel in
pharmaceutical care
To assess the level of patient satisfaction with pharmacy location,
the pharmacy premises and the interaction with the pharmacist
To assess factors affecting patient satisfaction
11
Conceptual frame work
pharmaceutical
care
patients Socio-
demographic
patronage characteristics
and status of e.g. (Age, sex,
payment Educational
level, work
status, income)
satisfaction
level
12
4.Methodology
4.1Study Area and Period: The Study was conducted at OPD
pharmacy of SPH in Dire Dawa, Eastern Ethiopia, from August 1
up to September, 15 ,2018
4.2 Study Design :A constitutional based cross-sectional study is
conducted using structured questionnaire was conducted
Population
Source population:
13
Inclusion and exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria :
All Patients who visited OPD Pharmacy for
medication
Exclusion Criteria
14
Sample size determination
15
Cont..
calculated is 340+17=357
16
Sampling technique
Systematic sampling technique is employed to select study
participants in the study. After calculating the total sample size.
357 questionaries’ were used to OPD SPH pharmacy by
c o n s i d e r i n g number of prescription comes to pharmacy per day,
every 8th patient was interviewed
Study variables
Independent variables
Socio-demographic (age, sex, marital status etc.)
Dependent variables
Patient satisfaction
17
Data Collection Method
Data Collection Instrument: A structured questionnaire was
used to collect data.
22
Socio-Demographic characteristics
Among respondents (51%) were females and (49%) males. (62.2
%) of them were married and, (50.7 %) Orthodox Christians
24
Satisfaction level of clients with the services of
the pharmacy
In the present study all of the 357 respondents
gave their responses to all the 18 parameters they
were asked to rate.
Based on the five point Likert scale the mean
summary score for each variable satisfaction level
was done (table 2)
25
Cont..
Among the mean scores the maximum scores were
given for parameters including “The location of the
pharmacy relative to other service areas” (3.51)
the overall cleanliness and comfort of the waiting area”
(3.41).
On the other hand, the parameters rated lowest
included “the information the pharmacist provided to
patients about the proper storage of your medication”
(1.89).
“The amount of time the pharmacy professional spent
with w” (1.7759), and The information the pharmacy
professional gives to patients about the results you can
expect from your medication therapy (1.3669).
26
Cont..
27
Level of satisfaction among the clients in SPH
OPD Pharmacy
Difference in satisfaction level among respondents
Bivariate logistic regression output to identify factors
associated with satisfaction level showed that age and level of
education were significantly associated with clients’
satisfaction.
30
Table 3. Test of statistical significance (logistic regression) of variation
in the mean satisfaction level of client’s by socio-demographic
characteristics, SPH, 2018
satisfaction Adjusted
OR p value
characteristics Satisfied Not satisfied [95% CI]
32
Cont..
are the leading cause of dissatisfaction and is almost the same
to the finding from a study done in Addis Ababa, on
pharmacies of governmental hospitals (Eshetu E, 2010).
38
5.8 Recommendation
The study recommends the following points which may help in
improving patients’ satisfaction in pharmaceutical care:
39
Cont..
40
reference.
Acknowledgment
1.Almighty God for giving me the inspiration to start and
patience to finalize this research.
2.A great thanks to my advisor Mr. bisrat hagos (B-pharm,Msc )