Professional Documents
Culture Documents
2019 Political Law Ateneo Summer Reviewer
2019 Political Law Ateneo Summer Reviewer
VCENTRAL
I BAR OPERATIONS 20191
LEILAS. LIM
Bar Review Secretariat
EUNICE A. MALAYO
FRANCES CHRISTINE F. SAYSON
Central Bar Operations
Academics Understudies
GIA MORIJENO
STEPHEN ESPIRITU FELEO QUIJANO
MARK VERGARA
SELINA MIRANDA JOHN CARILLO
HIDEYUKI SATO
VEYAJOSEF ANTOINEITE DUQUE
MARJOLAINE DE CASTRO
PRAM MENGHRAJAN! HAZEL SEGOVIA
JASON DIZON
GE-AN SALUD NICO CALDOZO
POLITICAL LAW Volunteers
'
'-,./
PRELIMINARIES
A. Political Law : 1
1. Subjects covered by political law ; ...•....•..•...................••...••... : 1
2. Constitutional Law ...............••..••........ .- : ....•....•.... :1
B. Constitution: Definition, Nature and concepts : 1
1. Classes of Constitution .. : 2
2. Basic Principles of Constitutional Construction ; 2
3. Doctrine of Constlt!Jtional Supremacy 2
4. Parts of the Constitution 2
5. Preamble : 2.
c. Self-Exec~ting and Non-Self-Executing Provisions 2
1. General Rule and Exceptions 2
D. General Provisions ......•.•.................•..•........••..........•.. : 3
1. Symbols of Nationality ····: 3
2. The Armed Forces of the Philippines _.. .. 3
3. The Police Force .: 3
4. Consumer Protections · !. 3
5. Mass Media and Advertising 3
E. Forms of Government
1. Government : ." 3
2. Administration 3
3. Types of De Facto Government. 4
4. Legislature 4
5. Executive 4
A. Leqlslatlve Power .. 13
1. Scope and limitatlon 13
2. Principle of Non-delegability; exceptions .. : 17
B. House of Congress; composition and qualification of members 19
1. Senate 19
' ·.
"
·- .. ,
-------~--------------
2. House of Representatives v- ; 19
a. District representatives and questions of appointment. 20
b. Party-1\st system 21
C. Privileges, Inhibitions, and Disqualiflcations .' 25
D. Discipline of Members 26
E. Process of Law-Making 27
F. Quorum and Voting Majorities 29
G. Appropriation and Re-allqnrnent. : 31
H. Legislative Inquiries
I
and Oversight functions
.
33
.
l, Power of Impeachment
I
· '
36
J. Electoral Tribunal. 36
K. Commission pn Appointments 37
L. Initiative and Referendum 38
I
I I m. EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENT -:J
TOPIC OUTLINE bNDER THE 2019 SYLLABUS
A. Qualifications, election, and term of the President and Vice-President.. 39
B. Privileges, ln~ibitlon, and Disqualifications 40
C. Powers of the President. 42
1. Executive and Administrative powers in General 42
2. Powe~of Appointment. 43
a. Confirmation
I
and by-passed appointments 44
.
b. Midnight and ad Interim appointments 45
c. Power of Removal 45
D. Power of Cohtrol and Supervision 46
E. Doctrine of Qualified Political Agency , 46
F. Executive departments and Officers 46
G. Local Governn,ent Units 47
1. Militaf,, Powers 47
a. Callin~ out power ,.. 47
b. Declaration of Martial Law and suspension of the privilege of the writ of habeas
..
:,; -:
corpus; requisites and parameters of extension 47
': _:· I
2. Executive Clemency 49
3. PoweI1rs pertinent to .Foreign Relations 50
H. Rules of Succession 53
1 ·
~- :
2. Fisca Autonomy L : 62
O. Qualifications of Members of the !Judiciary : ; · · .. 61
E. Workings of the Supreme Court .. ~ : ~ 62
1. En bane and Division cases '. : 63
2. Procedural Rule-maklng l 64
3. Administrative supervision oJe,· Jower courts 64
4. Original and Appellate Jurisdiption ,. 64
I '
I v. CONSTITUTIONAL COMMISSION
I
TOPIC OUTLINE UNDER THE 2019 SYLLABUS
A. Common Provisions ; · 66
B. Powers and functions of the csc, COMELEC, and COA : 68
C. Composition and Qualifications of Members 68
0. Prohibited Offices and lnterests .. ! : 66
E. Review of final orders, Resclutions,: and Decisions '
76
VII. CITIZENSHIP
'~.J'
. .
J. Personnel actions .- 172
1. Discipllne 173
a. Grounds 173
b. Jurisdlctions .' 174
c. Dismissal, preventive suspension, reinstatement and back salaries 174 ·
d. Condonatlon doctrine 177
2. Impeachment ~ 177
3. The Ombudsman .- 178
a. Functlone : 179
b. Judicial review in penal proceedings 181
4. Office of the Special Prosecutor ; ........•..... 181
5. The Sandiganbayan , 183
X. ELECTION LAW
~- I
TOPIC OUTLINE UNDER THE 2019 SYLLABUS
A. Suffrage 198
I '
1. Qualification and Disquallficatlon of voters · 199 l~,. " ~·
2. Registration of Voters 200
4. Inclusion and Exclusion Proceedi11gs 201
5. Local and Overseas Absentee Voting 202
6. Detainee VotlngCandidacy 202
B. Candidacy 205
1. Qualifications and Disqualifications of Candidates 205
2. Filing of Certificates of Candldacy 209
a. Effect of Filing ., 209
b. Substitution and Withdrawal of ~andldates : 209
c. Nuisance Candldates ~ 210 ('
\..:.:,.i
d. Duties of the COMELEC · 210
C. Remedies and Jurisdiction in Election Law 218
1. Petition to Deny Due Course or Cancel a Certificate of Candidacy 218
-.s
.••..J.__ -
2. Petition for Disqualification 218
3. Failure of Election, Call of Special Electlon 220
4. Pre-proclamation Controversy : '. 221
5. Election Protest 223
6. Quo Warrant<> 225
··:_,
A. Regalian Doctrine 257
B. Nationalist and Citizenship Requirement provlslons 258
(';, C. Exploration, Development, and Utilization of Natural Resources 260
•...... 1'
D. Franchises, Authority, and Certificates for Public Utilities 261
E. Acquisition, Ownership and Transfer of Public and Private Lands 263
F. Practice of Professlons 264
G. Organization and Regulation of Corporations, Private and Public 264
H. Monopolies, Restraint of Trade, and Unfair Competition 264
XV. FAMILY
A. Rights : : 270
1
{
.,
/
'
i r
""-"
~
..
i
'
; .>
1
":c ~
(
\.
...;,,,.;,
«:»
..
• t·
(, __-, '
ATENEO CENTRAL
BAR OPERATIONS 2019 POLITICAL LAW
THE PHILIPPINE CONSTITUTION l The written instrument agreed upon by tile people ... as
PRELIMINARIES the absolute rule of action and decision for all departments
and officers of the government ... and in opposition to
Political Law which any net or rule of any department or officer of the
Political law - branch of public law which deals with the government, or even of the people themselves, will be
organization and operations of the governmental organs altogether void (Cooley, JI/ Constitutional Umitations,
of the State and defines the relations of the State with the 1868).
inhabitants of its territory. (People v. Pedecto, 43 Phil 88
, 1922) The Constitution both creates the structures of government
and limits their powers.
Subjects covered by Philippine Political Law
a. Constitutional law - guaranties of the constitution to It is the document which serves as the fundamental law of
individual rights and the limitations on governmental the state; that written instrument enacted by the direct
action action of the people by which the fundamental powers of
b. Adrninlstratlve law- exercise of executive power in the the go·1ernment are established, limited and defined, and
making of rules and the decision of questions affecting by which those powers are distributed among the several
private rights departments for their safe and useful exercise, for the
c. Election Law - the study of the laws, rules, and · benefit of the body politic. [Malcolm, Phil. Constitutional
procedures involving the conduct of the election of all Law]
public officials who will exercise the powers of
government as allocated to and within their functions Philippine Constitution and Effectivity Dates
and responsibilitir.s 1935 Constitution: May 14, 1935
d. The law of public corporations - governmental 1973 Constitution: Jan. 17, 1973
agencies for local government or for other special 1986 Freedom Constitution: Mar. 25, 1986
purposes 1987 Constitution: Feb. 2, 1987
e. Law of Public Officers - study of the creation,
modification, and dissolution of public office as well as Classes of Constitution
the eligibility of public officers, the manner of their 1. Written and Unwritten
election or appointment and assumption of office, their (i) A written constitution's precepts are embodied in
rights, duties, powers, inhibitio~s and liabilities, and the one document or set of documents.
modes of terminating official relations. (ii) An unwritten constitution consists of rules which
have not been integrated into a single, concrete
Constitutional Law form but are scattered in various sources, such as
Designates the law embodied in the Constitution and the statutes of fundamental character, judicial
legal principles growing out of the Interpretation and decisions, commentaries of publicists, customs
application of its provisions by the courts in specific and traditions. (Cruz, Constitutional Law 4-5;
cases. It is the study of the maintenance of the proper Nachura, Outline Reviewer in Political Law 2]
balance between the authority as represented by the
three inherent powers of the State and liberty as 2. Enacted (Conventional) and Evolved (Cumulative)
guaranteed by the Bill of Rights. (i) A conventional constitution is enacted formally at
a definite time and place following a conscious or
CONSTITUTION deliberate effort taken by a constituent body or
DEFINITION, NATURE AND CONCEPTS ruler.
. ·. (ii) A cumulative body is the result of political
c f evolution, not inaugurated at any specific time but
·::~· Definition of Constitution
A written instrument enacted by direct action of the people changing by accretion rather than by any
by which the fundamental powers of government are systematic method. [Cruz, id., at 5]
established, limited, and defined, and by which these
powers are distributed among several departments, for , 3. Rigid and Flexible
their more safe and useful exercise, for the benefit of the (i) A constitution is classified as rigid when it may not
body politic (Bernas! 1987 Philippine Constitution, 2009). be amended except through a special process
distinct from and more involved than the method of
Page 1 of320
ATENEO CENTRAL
BAR OPERATIONS 2019
POLiTICAL LAW
changing ordinary laws. It is supposed that bysuch 1. Constitution of Liberty - sets forth the fundamental
a special procedure, the constitution is rendered civil and political rights of citizens, and imposing
difficult to change and thereby acquires a greater , limitations on the powers of government as a means of
degree of stability. · securing the enjoyment of those rights. (Art. Ill)
2. Constitution of Government - outlines the
(ii) A constitution is classified as flexible when it may organization of government, enumerating its powers,
be changed in the same manner and through the laying down rules regarding its administration, and
same body that enacts ordinary legislation. The defining the electorate. (Arts. VI, VII, vm.
IX)
Constitution of the UK is flexible. · 3. Constitution of Sovereignty- the mode or procedure
with which formal changes in the fundamental law may
Note: The Philippine Constitution is written, conventional be made. (Art. XVII)
and rigid.
Preamble
Basic Principles of Constitutional Construction An introduction that identifies:
f. Verba legis - whenever possible, the wcrds used in the authors of the Constitution (i.e. sovereign Filipino
the ConstiMion must be given their ordinary meaning people)
except where technical term are employed; their intentions, and
g. Ratio legls est anlma - words of the Constitution its purpose(s) of tt>e document.
should be interpreted in accordance with the intent of
the framers: _SELF-EXECUTING AND
h. Ut magis valeat quam pereat - the Constitution NON-SELF-EXECUTING PROVISIONS
should be interpreted as a whole [Francisco v. House
of Representatives, 415 SCRA 44 (2003)] General Rule: The provisions of the Constitution are r
considered self-executing, and do not require future '·.
In case of doubt, the provisions should be considered legislation for their enforcement.
self-executing (Manila Prince Hotel v GS/S, GR No
122156, February 3, 1997) ; mandatory rather than Exceptions:
directory (Tanada v Cuenco, GR No. L-10250, February Principles in Article II are not intended to be selt-executinq
28, 1957) and prospective rather than retroactive (Peralta principles ready for enforcement through the courts. They ·
v Director of Prisons, GR No -49, November 12, 1945) are used by the judiciary as aids or as guides in the
exercise of its power of judicial review, and by the
Self-Executing and Non-Self Executing Provisions legislature in its enactment of laws (Tondo Medicalv. Courl
1. Self Executing : provisions 'Nhich is complete in itself of Appeals, G.R. No. 167324, 2000). !
and becomes operative without the aid of The social and economic rights guaranteed in Article XIII ' .
supplementary or enabling legislation, or that which are also non-self-executing provisrons. (Bernas, r:
I .
supplies a sufficient rule by means of which the right it Constitutional Rights aod Social Demands, 1, 2010). ·
grants may be enjoyed or protected. (Manila Prince·
Hotel v GS/8) Exceptions to the Exceptions:
2. Non Self Executing: provisions which lays down a Article 11, Sec. 16 - The right to a balanced and healthful
general principle ecolcgy is self-executory and does not need an
implementing legislation (Oposa v. Factoran, G.R. No.
Doctrine of Constitutional Supremacy 101083, 199:1).
If a law or a contract violates any norm of the Article II, Sec. 28- The duty of full public disclosure is self-
Constitution, that law or contract, whether promulgated by executory(Province of North Cotabato v. GRP, G.R. No.
the legislative or executive branch of the government or 183591, zooe;
entered into by private persons for private purposes, is Article II, Sec. 15- The right to health is also self-executing
null and void, and without any force and effect. Since the (/mbong v. Ochoa, G.R. No. 204819, 2014).
Constitution is the fundamental and supreme law of the
land, it is deemed written in every statute and every NOTE: Whether or not a provision is self-executing
contract. (NACHURA) depends on the language of the provision. Most of the
provisions in Article II are couched in non-self-executing
Parts of the Cor,stitutlon language.
Essential Parts of a Written Constitution
Page 2 of320
ATENEO CENTRAL
BAR OPERATIONS 2019 POLITICAL LAW
~ ·:, 1 Note: On the National tevet, refers to the Legislative, 2Note: A de facto government can be denominated as such
·- :: Executive. Judicial departments. On the local level, refers to the only after they are defeated.
regional, provincial, city, muruclpal, and barrio governments.
Page 3 of320
··... ,;
ATENEO CENTRAL
BAR OPERATIONS 2019 POLITICAL LAW
'
,-,--"'!'-~'!11-----------------------------,------~------~----------------~~--~
I. PRELIMIN1"RY PROVISIONS AND BASIC
CONCEPTS
c. Treaty of 12 January 1930 between the United States
and Great Britain: Ceding the Turtle and Mangsee
TOPIC OUTLINE UNDER THE SYLLABUS Islands. [BERNAS (2003), cited in Justice Velasco's
A. National Territory . concurring opinion In Maga/Iona v. Ermita (2011)).
B. Declaration of Prtnctpies and State Policies
C. Separation of Powers Composition of National Territory
0. Checks and Balances · (a) Philippine Archipelago, with all the islands and
E. State Immunity waters embraced therein;
(b) Internal Waters : waters around, betwean and
connecting the islands of the archipelaqo, regardless
A. NATIONAL TERRITORY of breadth and dimension; and
(c) All other territories over which the Philippines has
Provision on National Territory sovereignty or jurisdiction
The National Territory comprises the Philippine -,
Archipelago, with all the islands and waters embraced It consists of:
therein, and all other territories over which the Philippines (1) Territorial sea, seabed, subsoil, insular shelves, and
has sovereignty or jurisdiction, consisting of its terrestrial, o.~er submarine areas
fluvial, and aerial domains, including its territorial sea, the (2) Terrestrial, fluvial, and aerial domains
seabed, the subsoil, the insular shelves, and other .
submarine areas. The waters around. between, and Future Acquisitions included in Natlonal Territory
connecting the islands of the archipelago, reqardless of The clause includes any territory presently belonging or
their breadth and dimension, form part of the internal those that might in the future belong to the Philippines
waters of the Philippines (Art I , Sec. 1 ). · through any of the accepted international modes of
(. ,;-· acquiring territory.
Archipelagic Doctrine
A body of water studded with islands, or the islands Territories belonging to Philippines by historic right or
surrounded with water, is viewed as a unity of islands and title
waters together forming one integrated unit. (N.B. The clause also includes what was referred to under the
Embodied in Art. II, specifically by the mention of the 1973 Constitution as territories "belonging to the
"Philippine archipelago" and the specification on "internal Philippines by historic right or legal title," that is, territories
waters."] which, depending on available evidence, might belong to
the Philippines (e.g., Sabah, the Marianas, Freedom/and)
Application to the Philippines (Bernas, Constitutional Rights and Social Demands, 8,
The waters around, between, and connecting the islands 2010).
...· ... of the archioeiaqo, regardless of their breadth and
\I ·;
.. ·" dimensions, form part of the internal waters of the Under Article 3 of the UNCLOS, "every state has the right
Philippines (Art. I, Sec. 1) to establish the breadth of its territorial sea up to a limit not
le.·· exceeding 12 nautical miles, measured from the baselines"
Treaty limits of the Philippine archipelago
a. Treaty of.Paris of 10 December 1898: "Spain cedes to Contl3uous Zone
the United States the archipelago known as the It is an area of water which extends up to 24 nautical miles
Philippines Islands, and comprehending the islands from the baseline (12 nautical miles from the Territorial
lying within the follo\Ving line" Article 3 of the said treaty Sea). Although not part of the territory, the coastal State
defines the metes and bounds of the archipelago by may exercise jurisdiction to prevent infringement of
longitude and latitude, degrees and seconds. customs, fiscal, immigratiJJn, or sanitary laws.
Technical descriptions are made of the scope of the
archipelago as this may be found on the surface of the Exclusive Economic Zone
earth. This refers to the body of water extending up to 200
b. Treaty of Washington of 7 November ~900 between nautical miles beyond the baseline, within which the state
,'
,. , the United States and Spain: Ceding Cagayan, Sibuto may exercise sovereign rights to explore, exploit,
and Sulu. conserve, and manage the natural resources.
Portion of the continental shelf that lies beyond the 200 direction of the coast, in order to delineate the internal
nautical mile limit. A coastal state may establish a waters from the territorial waters of an archipelago.
continental shelf beyond the 200 nautical miles from its
coastline. The Basellne Law (R.A. 9522, 2009)
R.A. No. 9522-amended R.A. No. 3046, entitled "An Act to
The coastal State may establish the outer limits of its· Define the Baselines of the Territorial Sea of the
juridical continental shelf wherever the continental margin Philippines;" specified that baselines of Kalayaan Group of
extends beyond 200 nautical miles by establishing the foot Islands and Bajo de Maslnloc (Scarborough Shoal) shall
of the continental slope, by me•}ting the requirements of be detennined as "Regime of Islands" under the Republic
Article 76, paragraphs 4-7, of the UNCLOS. of the Philippines, consistent with the UNCLOS.
The Philippine archipelago and all other territories consist R.A. No. 9522 is const!tutlonal:
of the following domains: (TAFA) ( 1) it is a statutory tool to demarcate the maritime zone and
i. Ierrestrial continental shelf of the Philipptnes under UNCLOS 111,
ii. Aerial and does not alter the national territory. Basehnes laws
iii. fluvial are nothing but statutory mechanisms for UNCLOS Ill
iv. All other territories outside archlpelago over which RP state parties to delimit with precision the extent of their
has sovereignty or jurisdiction maritime zones and continental shelves. The law has
nothing to do with acquisition, enlargement, or
Normal Baseline Method diminution of territory, as States may only acquire (or
The baseline is drawn following the low-water line along lose) territory through the following modes: (CAPO)
the coasts as marked on large-scale charts officially tession,
recognized by the coastal State. This line follows the Accretion
sinuosities of the coast and therefore would normally not frescription, and
consist of straight lines (Section 5, 1982 LOS; Bernas, Qccupation (Magaflona v. Ermita. G.R. No. 187167, 2011).
1987 Philippine Constltution: A Commentary, 23, 2009). (2) The law also does not abandon the country's claim to
Sabah, as it does not expressly repeal the entirety of
Straight basellne method R.A. No. 5446. [Maga/Iona v. Ermita, G.R. No. 187167,
Territorial 12 nautical Absolute consists 16 July 2011)
miles from Sovereignty of
Sea
baselines drawing The law also does not convert internal waters into
24 nautical Enforcement straight archipelagic waters (which allow the right of innocent
miles from of customs. lines passage). The Philippines still exercises sovereignty over
Contiguous baselines fiscal, the body of water lying landward of the baselines including . . ..
Zone immigration, the air space over it and the submarine areas underneath.
sanitation The political branches of the Philippine government, in the
laws competent discharge of their constitutional powers, may
200 nautical Exploitation pass legislation designating routes within the archipelagic
Exclusive
miles from of living and waters to regulate innocent and sea lanes passage
Economic
baselines non-living
' (Maga/Iona v. Ermita, G.R. No. 187167, 2011). \.-,.:1
Zone
resources ..
Submerged Sovereign The Baselines Law does not abandon the Philippines' ·,' ....-:.·'-
prolongation rights of claim over Sabah under RA 5446. The definition of the
of the land exploration baselines of the territorial sea of the Philippine Archipelago
Continental territory and is without prejudice to the delineation of the baselines of
exploitation the territorial sea around the territory of Sabah, situated in
Shelf
of living and North Borneo, over which the Philippines has acquired
dominion and sovereignty (RA 556, Sec. 2).
r '·
non-living
resources of
the seabed Maritime Zones
connecting appropriate points on the coast without
[.. _ .,.:
departing to any appreciable extent from the general Regime of Islands ..
Page6 of320
ATENEO CENTRAL
BAR OPERATIONS 2019 POLITICAL LAW
Examples:
B. DECLARATION OF PRINCIPLES AND STATE i. The right of an alien to be released on ball while
POLICIES awaiting deportation when his failure to leave the
country is due to the fact that no country will accept
Principles him (Mejoffv.Director of Prisons, G.R. No. L-4254,
binding rules which must be observed in the conduct of 1951).
government. ii. The right of a country to establish military
commissions to try war criminals (Kuroda v.
Policies Jalandoni, G.R. No. L-2662, 1949).
guidelines for the orientation of the state. iii. The Vienna Convention on Road Signs and
Signals (Agustin v. Edu, G.R. No. L-49112, 1979).
Elements of a State (GSPoT) iv. Duty to protect the premises of embassies and
§overnment • institution or aggregate of ir1stitutions by legations (Reyes v. Bagatsing, G.R. No. L-65366,
which an independent society makes and carries out those 1983).
rules of action which are necessary to enable men to live v. Pacta sunt servanda - international agreements
in a social state, or which are imposed upon the people must be performed in good falth (Tanada v.
forming that society by those who possess the power or Angara, G.R. No. 118295, 1997).
authority of prescribing them (See also: "General Principles of Law" pg. 303)
l?overeignty - power of the State to regulate matters within
its own territory. The Philippines renounces aggressive war as an
. Population - community of persons sufficient in number instrument of national policy, but allows for a defensive
and capable of maintaining the continued existence of the war.
v , ;, community and held together by a common bond of law .
Ierritory - a definite area over. which the State exercises Civilian Authority
sovereign jurisdiction. Article II, Section 3 of the Constitution states that
. "[c}ivllian authority Is, at all times, supreme over the
Difference between a unitary and federal form of military. The Armed Forces of the PhHippines is the
government protector cf the People and the State. Its goal is to secure
UNITARY FEDERAL the sovereignty of the State and the integrity of the
national territory."
I •. :: Powers are concentrated The central authority and
in one central authority constituent political units Civilian Authority - The head of the armed forces is a
and some of which are divide and share the civilian president and the primary purpose of AFP is to
merely delegated to other power, where the central serve and protect the people.
units (e.g. delegated government is focused on
Mark of sovereignty - Positively, the military is the
legislative power to LGUs) more specificfunctions,
guardian of the people and of the integrity of the national
territory and therefore ultimately of the majesty of the law. Acquisition of Agri-Biotech v. Greonpeece, G.R. No.
Negatively, it is an expression against military abuses. 209271, 2015)
Exception to policy against nuclear weapons may be made Standing to file an action for violation of
by political deoartments, but must be justified by demands environmental laws
of national interest. The enactment of the Rules of Procedure for
Environmental Cases enabled litigants enforcing
Social Justice environmental rights to file their cases as citizen suits. It
The State shall promote social Justice In all phases of liberalized standing for all cases filed enforcing
national development. environmental laws and collapses the traditional rule on
personal and direct Interest, based on the principle that
Social Justice has been defined by Justice Laurel as the humans are stewards of nature. The need to give animals
humanization of laws and the equalization of social and legal standing in environmental cases has been eliminated
economic forces by the State so that justice in its rational by the Rules since any Filipino citizen, as a steward of
and objectively secular conception may at least be nature, is allowed to bring a suit to enforce environmental
approximated (Calalang v. Williams, 70 Phil. 726, 1910). laws. (Resident Marine Mammals v. Reyes, G.R. No. '·
180771, 2015)
Protection of the Life of the Unborn
It is not an assertion that the unborn is a legal person. It is -. Requisites fer the lssuance of Writ of Kalikasan
not an assertion that the life of the unborn is placed exactly 1. There is an actual or threatened violation of the
on the same level of the life of the mother. Hence, when it constltufional right to a balance and healthful ecology;
is necessary to save the life of the mother, the lifo of the 2. The actual or threatened violation arises from an
unborn may be sacrificed. unlawful act or omission of a public official or
employee, or private individual or entity;
The Roe v. Wade doctrine allowing abortion up to the 6th 3. The actual or threatened violation involves or will lead
month of pregnancy cannot be adopted in the Philippines to an environmental damage of such magnitude as to
because the life of the unborn Is protected from the time of prejudice the life, health or property of inhabitants in
conception. two or more cities of provinces. (LNL Archipelago
Minerals Inc v. Agham Party List, GR 209165, 2016) J ·-
1 .. ,
Right to a Balance and Healthful Ecology
The right to a balanced and healthful ecology is not less C. SEPARATION OF POWERS f__-;,
important than any of the civil and political rights
enumerated in the Bill of Rights. The right to a balanced An allocation of the three great powers of government in
and healthful ecology carries with it an intergenerational the following manrer: legislation to Congress, execution of
responsibility to care for and protect the environment laws to the Executive, and settlement of legal I""'\_
(Oposa v. Fectoren, G.R. No. 101083, 1993). controversies to the Judiciary. It is also an implicit limitation i
on their powers, preventinq one from invading the domain
,. ~
In environmental cases, the precautionary principle is used of the others, but the separation is not total. ·..... ... .,
when there is a lack of full scientific certainty in establishing
a causal link between human activity and environmental The principle of separation of powers ordains that each of
effect. The precautionary principle, as a principle of last the three great government branches has exclusive
resort, shifts the burden of evidence of harm away from cognizance of and is supreme in concerns falling within its
those likely to suffer harm and onto those desiring to own constitutionally allocated sphere; e.g., the Judiciary as
change the status quo. (International Service for the Justice Laurel emphatically asserted "will neither direct nor
restrain executive (or legislative] action" (Republic v. Exception - the State consents to be sued;
Bayao, G.R No. 179492, 2013).
How a State gives Its consent
p. CHECKS AND BALANCES a. Express consent
1. General Law
A system operating between and among the three 2. Special Law
branches of government the net effect of which is that no b. Implied consent
one department is able to act without the cooperation of at 1. When the State commences litigation, it becomes
least one of the other departments. vulnerable to a c!ounterclaim; ( United States of
America v. Judge Guinto, 261 Phil. 1n. 790
Examples: (1990)) .
Legislation in the form of an enrolled bill needs final 2. State enters into a business contract (it is
approval from the President to become a law: exercising proprietary functions); (United States of
President must obtain the concurrence of Congress to America v. Judge Guinto, 261 Phil. 777, 795
complete certain acts (e.g. granting of amnesty); (1990))
Money can be released from the Treasury only by authority 3. When it would be inequitable for the State to
of Congress; invoke immunity;
Appropriation, revenue, tariff, increases In public debt and 4. In eminent domain cases.
private bills originate in House of Representatives;
SC can declare acts of Congress or the Executive State's Business Contracts
unconstitutional. A State's commercial activity is a descent to the level of
individuals and there is a form of tacit consent to be sued
E. STATE IMMUNl'fX when It enters Into business contracts with others.
I ;,
BASIS: Art. XVI, Sec. 3: "The state may not be sued However, not every contract entered into ts a form of tacit
without its consent." This is based on the principle of consent to be sued. It depends upon whether the forsiqn
equality of states - par in parem non habet imperium. state is engaged in the activity in the regular course of
business. If not, or if it is in pursuit of a sovereign activity,
Doctrine of State Immunity it falls within the exemption of acts jure imperii especially
It refers to a principle by which a state, Its agents, and when not intended for gain or profit.
property are immune from the jurisdiction of another state
[MAGALLONA]. A party who feels transqressed by anyone claiming
immunity may ask his own government to espouse his
Principle of Equality of States cause through diplomatic channels.
This principle is premised on the juridical equality of states,
according to which a state may not impose its authority or Extent of Immunity
extend its jurisdictlon to another state without the consent Immunity from jurisdiction is enjoyed by both the head of
of the latter through a waiver qt immunity. Thus, domestic , State and by the State itself. The State's diplomatic agents,
courts must decline to hear cases against foreign including consuls to a certain extent, are also exempt from
sovereigns out of deference to their role as sovereigns. the jurisdiction of local courts and administrative tribunals.
Page 9 of320
----··-·· !
ATENEO CENTRAL
BAR OPERATIONS :!013 POLITICAL LAW
activities or economic affairs (Arigo v. Swift, G.R. No. compel performance of a ministerial duty. [Begoso v.
.206510, 2014). PVA (1970)]
b. When from the allegations in the complaint, it is clear
Scope of State Immunity that the respondent Is a public officer sued in a private
Jure lmperii- Immunity is granted only with respect to their capacity;
governmental acts c. When the action is not in personam with the
Jure Gestionis - Immunity is not granted with respect to government as the named defendant, but an action in
their commercial acts rem that does not name the government in particular.
Difference between Jure Gestionis and Jure Imperil Test to determine if suit is against the State
Will the enforcement thereof (decision rendered against
JURE GESTIONIS JURE IMPERii
the public officer or agency impleaded) require an
By right of economic or By right of sovereign power, affirmative act from the State, such as the appropriation of
business relation in the exercise of sovereign the needed amount to satisfy the judgment? If so , then it
functions is a suit agalnst the State. (Sanders v. Verdiano, 162
' SCRA 88)
Maybe sued May not be sued
Suits against an Ynlnco,porated government agency a. When the State commences litigation, it becomes
Suit is against a government Qfficial, but is such that vulnerable to counterclaim
ultimate liability shall devolve on the government b. When the State enters into a business contract (in
It produces adverse consequences to the public treasury jure gestionis or proprietary functions)
in terms of disbursement of public funds and loss of c. When it would be inequitable for the State to invoke
government property. its immunity
It cannot prosper unless the Staie has given its consent. d. In instances when the State takes private property
for public use or purpose (=minent Domain)
When not against the state
I ~.
It was held that the suit is not against the State: Specific Rules ·-,_,
a. When the purpose of the suit is to compel an officer a. When State Commences Litigation . '
charged with the duty of making payments pursuant to ()
an appropriation made by Jaw in favor of the plaintiff to • Exception: When the State intervenes not for the
make such payment, since the suit is intended to purpcse of asking for any affirmative relief, but only
for the purpose of resisting the claim precisely '.·
Page 10 of 320
ATENEO CENTRAL
BAR OPERATIONS2019 POLITICAL LAW
because of immunity from suit (Lim v Brownell, GR Suits against Government Agencies
No. L-8587, March 24, 1960) a. Incorporated: If the charter provides that the agency
can sue and be sued, then suit will lie, including one for
b. When State enters a Business Contract tort. The provision In the charter constitutes express
consent on the party of the State to be sued. (PNB v
• Types of Capacities of the State in entering into
CIR, 81 SCRA 314)
contracts:
b. Unincorporated:
1. Acta jure gestionis - by right of economic or
I) Performs governmental functions: Not suitable
business relations; commercial or proprietary
without State consent event if performing propriety
acts. The State may be sued. (US v, Guinto, GR
funcrion incidentally. Thus, even in the exercise of
No 76607, February 26, 1990)
proprietary functions lncidental to its primarily
2. Acta jum imperil - by right of sovereign power
governmental functions, an unincorporated agency
and in the exercise of sovereign functions; there
still cannot be sued without its consent
is no implied consent to be sued. (US v Ruiz, GR
II) Performs proprietary functions: Suable except
No. 35645, May 22, 1985)
when the proprietary functions are indispensable in
· the discharge of its governmental functions (Mobil
c. When Stale executes and enters private contracts
PHL Exploration \. Customs Arrastre Service, G,~
• General Rule: The State may be sued if a private No. 23139, December 17, 1966)
contract is entered into by the proper officer and
within the scope of his authority. Case Law Exceptions when State/Public Officer May
be sued without prior consent
• Exception: When the private contract Is incidental to
the performance of a govern'!lent function. a. To compel him to do an act required by law;
c. To restrain him from enforcing an act claimed to be
Suits against Public Officers unconstitutiona I;
General Rule: The doctrine of state immunity also applies d. To compel the payment of damages from an ~lready
· appropriated assurance fund or to refund tax over-
to complaints filed against officials of the State for acts
performed by them in the discharge of their duties within payments from a fund already available for the
the scope of their authority. purpose;
e. To secure a judgment that the officer impleaded may
Exception: The doctrine of immunity from suit will not satisfy by himself without the State having to do a
positive act to assist him;
apply and may not be invoked where the public official is
f. Where the government itself has violated its own laws.
being sued in his (1) private and personal capacity as an
ordinary citizen, for (2) acts without authority or in excess [Sanders v. Veridiano II, G.R. No. L-46930 (1988)]
.· ', ::
of the powers vested in him. [Lansang vs CA (2000)]
Rules regarding Garnishment of Government Funds
Rule on Liability of Public Officers General Rule: Garnishment of government funds is not
a. Acting beyond scope of Authority: When a public allowed. Whether the money is deposited by way of
general or special deposit, they remain government funds
officer acts in bad faith, or beyond the scope of his
and are not subject to garnishment.
authority, he can be held personally liable for damages.
b. Acting in Good Faith: If a public officer acted pursuant
Exceptions:
to his offlclal duties, without malice, negligence, or bad
i. Where a law or ordinance has been enacted
faith, he is not personally liable, and the suit is really
. ~~....... one against the State . appropriating a specific amount to pay a valid
[ ;, government obligation, then the money can be
·-..:: ..·
c. Ultra Vires Act: Where a public officer has committed
garnished.
an ultra vires act, or where there is a showing of bad
ii. If the funds belong to a public corporation or a
faith, malice, or gross negligence, the officer can be
GOCC which is clothed with a personality of its
held personally accountable even if such acts are
own, then the funds are not exempt from
claimed to have been performed in connection with
garnlshment(NHA v. Guivelando G.R. No. 154411,
official duties (Wylie v. Rarang, G.R. No. 74135, 1992).
2003).
'
'r'.' /".. To enforce monetary decisions against the Government, a
person may file a claim with the Commission on Audit It ls
Page 11 of 320
-.... j'
. . .. ./
-·- ··-··----------------~-
ATENEO CENTRAL
BAR OPERATIONS 2019 POLITICAL LAW
3. Hostis Humanis Generis - enemy of all mankind or proceedings against a State), the rationale for the ~..... /·
crimes justiciable by any state anywhere. i.e. Slave judgment in the Pinochet case has no bearing. I~
., ,,._ -,>
Trader, Pirate (Filaitiga v, Pena-Ira/a, 630 F.2d 876,
1980). Note:
A state is not deprived of immunity by reason of the fact '·
Acts of State Immunity that it is accused of serious violations of international ,
-::
Every state is bound to respect the Independence of human rights law or the international law of armed conflict.
·~
every other sovereign state. and the courts of one country The court distinguished between immunity and substantive
will not sit in judqrnent on the acts of the government of jus cogens rules of International law and held that a finding
another, done wlthin its. own territory. Redress of of immunity does not equal a finding that a state did not
grievances by reason of such acts must be obtained owe reparations (Jurisdictional Immunities of the State:
through the means open to he availed of by sovereign Germany v. Italy, 2012).
. '
powers as between themselves. v
-,
--- end of topic---
Page 12 of 320
ATENEO CENTRAL
BAR OPERATIONS 2019 P.OI.ITICAL LAW
t. ,:.·
K. Commission on Appointments
L. Initiative and Referendum General Rule: Conqress cannot delegate its legislative
power under the principle of non-delegation (delegata
potestas non potest de/egari or delegated power may not
be delegated). ·
A. LEGISLATIVE POWER
Exceptions: (PLATE)
1. SCOP~ AND LIMITATION
To the extent reserved to the feople by the provision on
initiative and referendum.
Classification of Powers
Delegation to ,bocal government
1. Legislative
Delegc1tion of rule-making 'power to 6dministrative bodies
a. General plenary power ·
Congress may delegate !ariff powers tc the President
b. Specific power of appropriation (will be discussed
~mergency powers delegated by Congress to the
in subsection (G))
President
c. Taxation and expropriation
r. .• d. Legislative investigations (will be discussed in
Classification of Legislative Power (COrODe):
subsection (H))
( -.,. e. Question Hour 1. ~onstituent - The power to propose amendments
0 2. Non-Legislative · to the Constitution.
.... a. Canvass presidential elections
2. Q!:dinary - The power to pass ordinary laws
(,.) ;~
3. Qriginal - Possessed by the people In their
b. Declare the existence of a state of war
:.overeign capacity, exercised via initiative and
c. Delegetiori of emergency powers
referendum.
d. Call special election for President and Vice
President
4. Delegated - Possessed by Congress and other
legislative bodies by virtue of the Constitution
e. Give concurrence to treaties and amnesties
Limits
f. Propose constitutional amendments
Substantive - limitations on the content of laws."
g. Confirm certain appointments (will be discussed in
Procedural - limitations on the manner of passing laws.s
subsection (K))
Conqress cannot pass irrepealable laws.
-, .. :
-· .•.I
ATENEO CENTRAL
BAR OPERATIONS 2019 POLITICAL LAW
Local Legislative Those against such action may apply for initiative. (RA
Local legislative bodies are allowed by our Constitution to · 6735, Sec. 15). ·
legislate on purely public matters. Since what was given to
local legislative bodies are not power to make rules and Limitation on Local Legislative Body vis-a-vis Local
regulations but legislative power, the rules on valid Initiative .
delegation do not apply. However, when what is given to Any proposition or ordinance approved through an initiative
local legislative body is executive power, the rules and referendum shall not be repealed, modified or
applicable to the empowerment of administrative agencies amended by the Scinggunian within 6 months from its date
also becomes applicable (Rubi v. Provincial Board, G.R. of approval, and may be amended, modified, repealed
No. L-14078. 1901). within 3 years thereafter by a vote of 3/4 of nll its members.
In case of baranqays, the period shall be 18 months after
Requisites of A Valid Ordinance: (Must NOT CUPPU, approval.(LGC, S1:1c.125)
Must be GC)
Must not fontravene the Constitution or any statute Indirect Initiative
Must not be .!.!.nfair or oppressive a
Exercise of initiative by the people through proposition
Must not be fartial or discriminatory sent to the Congress or the local legislative body for action·
Must not f rohlbit, but may regulate trade (RA 6735, Sec.3, Par(b)) · ·
Must not be ,Ynreasonable
Must be !zeneral and ~onsistenl with public policy Referendum .
(Magtajas v. Pryce Properties. G.R. No. 111097, 1994). refers to the power of the electorate to approve or reject
I legislation through an election called for the purpose (RA
People's Initiative on Statutes 6735, Sec. 3(c)).
\
Initiative Required Petition
The power of the people to propose amendments to the 1. Petition should be registered with the Commission on
Constitution or to propose and enact legislation called for Elections (RA 6735)
the purpose (RA 6735, Sec. 3(a)). 2. Should be signed by at least 10% of the total number
of registered voters
Three Types Of Initiative (CSL) 3. Every legislative district must be represented by at
1. Initiative on the ~onstitution - A petition proposing feast 3% of the registered voters thereof
amendments to the Constitution.
2. Initiative on §tatutes - A petition proposing to enact a The petition lo be signed b~ the people should contain a
national legislation. definite proposal of the amendment of the Constitution; not : '
::, :
3. Initiative on Local ~,egislation - A petition proposing to merely a ge'leral question whether they approve of the
enact a regional, provincial, city, municlpal, or amendment or not (Lambino v. COMELEC, G.R. No. c
.. 1•
barnngay law. resolution or ordinance (RA 6735, Sec. 174153, 200(>).
3(a)).
Two Classes Of Referendum (RA 6735, Sec. 3(c))
Local Initiative Referendum on statutes - petition to approve or reject an
Not less than 2,000 registered voters in case of act or law, or part thereof, passed by Congress
autonomous regions, 1,000 in case of provinces and cities; R'3ferendum on local laws ~ legal processes whereby the
100 in case of municipalities, and 50 in case of barangays: registered voters of the focal government units may
may file a petition with the Regional Assembly or local approve, amend or reject any ordinance enacted by the
legislative body, respectively, pre.posing the adoption, Sanggunian (LGC. Sec 126).
enactment, repeal or amendment of any law, ordinance or
resolution. (RA No 6735, Sec.13) Matters Which May Not Be the Subject of Initiative or
Referendum (RA 6735, Sec. 10)
Limitations on the Power of Local Initiative Should not A petition embracing more than one subject.
be exercised more than once a year; Statutes Involving emergency measures.
Extended only to subjects or matters which are within the
legal powers of local legislative bodies to enact; ,
If the local legislative body adopts the proposition in toto
before the initiative is held, the initiative shall be cancelled.
Page 14 of 320
·----------'----- ·--· -
.,.,
ATENEO CENTRAL
BAR OPERATIONS 2019 POLITICAL LAW
., .:'
':.........
Page 15 of 320
---- --·---··--'------------'
ATENEO CENTRAL
BAR OPERATIONS 20•9 POLITICAL LAW
Constitutlonal Tax Exemption - The following properties iii. No specific funds shall be appropriated or
are exempt from real property taxes (Sec. 28(3)): (MAC3) paid for use or benefit of ar.y religion, sect,
- Mosques etc., except for priests, etc. assigned to
- ~II lands, buildings and improvements actually, directly AFP, penal Institutions, etc.
and exclusively used for religious, charitable, or 3. On Taxation
educational purposes. i. No law granting any tax exemption shall be
- £haritable institutions. passed without · the concurrence of a
- &hurches, and parsonages or convents appurtenant majority of all the Members of the
thereto. Congress
- Non-profit £emeterit,s. ii. All money collected on any tax levied for a
special purpose shall be treated as a
Other Exemptions Under Article XIV: special fund and poid out for such purpose
Ali revenues and assets of non-stock non-profit only
educational institutions are exempt from taxes and duties iii. All revenues and assets ':>f non-stock, non-
provided that such revenues and assets are actually, profit educational institutions used
directly and exclusively used for educational purposes actually, directly and exclusively for
(Sec. 4 (3)). educational purposes shall be exempt
from taxes and duties
Grants, endowments, donations or contributions used 4. On Constitutional appellate jurisdiction of
actually, directly and exclusively for educational purposes Supreme Court
shall be exempt from tax, subject to conditions prescribed i. No law shall be passed increasing the
by law (Sec. 4 (4)). appellate jurisdiction of the supreme Court
as provided in the Constitution without its
Power t.o Fix Rates (Sec. 28 (2)) advice and concurrence
Delegation of Power to Fix Rates - Congress may, by ii. No law granting title of royalty or nobility
law, authorize the President to fix the following: (TITO) shall be passed
Iariff rates
Import and export quotas b. Implied Limitations
Ionnage and wharfage dues 1. Prohibition against irrepealable laws; and
Qther duties and imposts within the framework of the 2. Non-delegatio;, of powers (NACHURA)
national development program
c. Jurisprudence
Summary of Limitations
a. Substantive • Power of Congress to provide Holdover:
Congress cannot provide for th~ holdover of
a. Express Limitations
elective officers if the same would go beyond their
1. Bill of Rights
terms fixed by the Constitution (Datu Abas Kida v.
I. No law shall be passed abridging freedom
Senate, GR No 196271, October 18, 2011)
of speech, of expression, etc.
ii. No law shall be made respecting an , · • Powor of Congre,ss to create new Term and { ,,
establishment of religion or prohibiting the appoint Occupant of Position: Congress "'--''
free exercise thereof; cannot create a new term and effectively appoint
iii. No law impairing the obligation of the occupant of the position for the new term (Id.)
contracts shall be passed;
• Power to gr.mt franchise for Public Utilities:
iv. No ex post facto law or bill of attainder
Congress cannot grant legisla~ive franchises for
shall be enacted
the operation of publlc utilities which shall be
2. On Appropriation
exclusive in character and which shall not · be
i. The procedure in approving appropriations
subject to amendment, alteration or repeal when ( ';
for the Congress shall strictly follow the "'--'
common good so requires. {Tawang Mufti
procedure for approving appropriations for
purpose Coop. v. La Trinidad Water District, GR
other departments and agencies;
No 166471, March 22, 2011)
ii. Prohibition against use of public money or
property for religious purpose;
Page 16 of 320
ATENEO CENTRAL
BAR OPERATIONS 2G19 POLITICAL LAW
. --·· -·-·--·----------------
ATENEO CENTRAL
BAR OPERATIONS 2019 POLITICAL LAW
and must prescribe sufficient standards. It also includes Test of Valid Delegation
the determination of the presence of the conditions for the 1. Completeness Test - The law must state the policy
law to take effect. that must be carried out or implemented and leave no room
• Rationale: for the delegate to legislate; nor allow discretion on their
o Increasing complexity of the task of government part to say what the law is; there must be nothing left for'
o lack of technical competence on the part of the delegate to do but to enforce the law.
Congress to provide for specific details of
implementation 2. Sufficiency of Standard - The limits are sufficiently
o Administrative agencies may fill up details of the determinate and determinable to which the delegate must
statute for implementation conform in the performance of his actions.
o legislature may pass "contingent legislation
"which leaves to another body the business of Examples:
ascertaining facts necessary to bring the law into Public interest (People v. Rosenthal, G.R. Nos. L-46076
action (ABAKADA v. Ermita, G.R. No. 168056, and L-46077, 1939).
2005). Fair and equitable employment practices (Eastern
Shipping Lines v. POEA, supra)
• If there was a valid delegation, administrative rules and · justice and equity
regulations are just binding as if it was written in the public convenience and welfare
law. simplicity, economy, and efficiency.
• Admlnlstratlve agencies may not issue regulations that
contravene the law (Solicitor General v. Metro Manila Note:
Authority, G.R. No. 102782, 1991) nor may they add to Standards may be expressed or implied from the law taken
the standards set by law (Tatad v. Secretary of Energy, as a whole (Edu v. Ericta, G.R. No. L-32096, 1970). They
G.R. No. 124360, 1997). can even be gathered in other statute of the same subject
• Administrative rules and regulations may be penal in matter (Chongbian v. Orbos, G.R. No. 96754, 1995).
nature provided that:
o such a violation is made a crime by the delegating -, A law allowing a judge to inflict punishment of
law: imprisonment in its discretion without any designated limits
o penalty of such is provided in the statutes is invalid (People v. vacuycoy, G.R. No. L-45127, 1989).
o the regutation is published.
• Powers of Congress which are not to be delegated are Section 8 of PQ 910 regarding the Malampaya funds
those that are strictly or inherently legislative. Purely provides: "all fees, revenues and receipt. .. under the
legislative power is the authority to make a complete Petroleum Act of 1949; as well as the government
law - complete as to the time it shall take effect or to share ... shall form part of a special fund to be used to
whom it shall be applicable and to determine the
expediency of the enactment
finance energy resource development and exploitation
programs and projects of the government and for such
c:
··...:.•
declared national policy in times of war or other national Subordinate legislation: Filling up the details of an \..:-·
emerqency pursuant to law. otherwise complete statute; or
Contingent Legislation: Ascertaining the fact necessary to
bring a "contingent" law or provision into actual operation.
Page 18 of 320
ATENEO CENTRAL
BAR OPERATIONS 2019 POLITICAL LAW
Page 19 of 320
' ,'
ATENEO CENTRAL
BAR OPERATIONS 2019 POLITICAL LAW
Term limit: no more than 2 Term limit: no more than 3 The standards used to determine the apportionment of
consecutive terrns consecutive terms legislative districts is meant to prevent 'gerrymandering.'
·--------------··.-· ...
ATENEO CENTRAL
BAR OPERATIONS2019 POLITICAL LAW
initial legislativ& district. The Constitution does not respective sectors the seats reserved for sectoral
require a city to increase its population by another representation.
250,000 to be entitled to an additional district (/d.)
RA 7941, the Party-List System Act was approved on
• Necessity of Confirmation by Plebiscite: The
March 3, 1995. This law put into place the mechanics for a
creation of legislative districts does not need
party-iist system of representation based on election and
confirmation by plebiscite if it does not involve the
ended the appointment of sectoral representatives by the
creation of a local government unit. (Bagabuyo v.
President as provided in the Transitory Provisions.
COMELEC, GR No. 176970, December 8, 2008)
For the purposes of the May 1998 elections, the first 5
Difference of Re3pportionment In Sec. 5(10), Art. VI
major political parties on the basis of party representation
and the Creation of LGU In Sec. 10, Art. X.
in the House of Representatives at the start of the Tenth
In the former, the purpose is to ensure better access to
Congress of the Philippines shall not be entitled to
one's district representative in Congress. No political or
participate in the party-list system.
corporate unit is created. Thus, there Is no need for a
plebiscite in the creation, dissolution, or any other similar
Mechanics (RA 7941, Sec. 8)
action on a legislative district. ·
Registered party-lists, organizations, or coalitions shall
submit to the COMELEC a list of not less than five (5)
In the latter, political and corporate units are created or
nominees in order of priority.
altered. These possess legal personality and are
• A person may be nominated in one (1) list only.
considered "instrumentalities of the State in carrying out
• Only persons who have given their consent in
the functions of government". They exercise special
writing may be named in the list.
functions for the sole benefit of constituents. Thus, the
need for a plebiscite to expressly secure the consent of the • Candidates for any elective office in the
people affected by the creation, division, merger, abolition immediately preceding election shall be
disqualified from becoming a nominee.
or alteration of boundaries of local government units
through a plebiscite (Bagabuyo v. COMELEC, G.R. No. • No change of names or alteration of the order of
176970, 2008). . nominees shall be allowed after the same shall
have been submitted to the COMELEC,
Party-list system Exceptions:
- When the nominee dies, or
Party-List Representatives (Sec. 5 (2)) - Withdraws in writing his nomination,
Constitute 20% of the total number of representatives (the - Becomes incapacitated in which case the name of the
j .. total includes the party-list representatives). The maximum · substitute nominee shall be placed last in the list.
i,
( ,,
.., number of House of Representative members is set at 250,
which means a maximum of 50 part-list members are Incumbent sectoral representatives in the House of
allowed. But this· number can be increased through a Representatives who are nominated In the party-list
passage of a law (Banat v. COMELEC, G.R. Nos. 179271 system shall not be considered resigned.
& 179295, 2009}.
The parties, organizations, and coalitions shall be ranked
However, for 3 consecutive terms after the ratification of . from the highest to the lowest based on the number of
the 1987 Constitution (1987-1992, 1992-1995 and 1995- votes garnered during elections. (Sec. 11, R.A. 7941).
1998} from February 2, 1987 until 1998, one half of the
seats allocated to party-list representatives shall be filled Parameters In Party-List Elections
as provided by law, by selection or election from the labor, 20% of the total number of the membership of the House
peasant, urban poor, ·indigenous cultural communities, of Representatives Is the maximum number of seats
women, youth, and such other sectors as may be provided available to party-list organizations, such that there is
by law, except the religious sector (PHIL. CONST. art. VI, automatically . o~e party-list seat for every four existing
I'
\-.,;:
' .
legislative districts.
§ 5(2)}.
Garnering 2% of the total votes cast in the party-list
J
Under Art. XVIII, Sec. 7, until a !aw is passed, the President ·, elections guarantees a party-list organization one seat.
may fill by appointment from a :ist of· nominees by the The gu~ranteed seats shall be distributed in a first round
Page 21 of 320
\ ..,}
of seat allocatio11~rties receiving at least two ps-cent A bona fide member of the party or organization he seeks
of the total party-list votes. to represent for at least 90 days before the day of the
The additional seats. i.e. the remaining seats after -, election.
allocation of the guaranteed seats, shall be distributed to A nominee who changes his sectoral affiliation within the
the party-list organizations including those that received same party will only be eligible for nomination under the
less than 2% of the total votes. The additional seats shall new sectoral affiliation if the change has been effected at
be distributed to the parties in a second round of seat least six months before the elections (Amores v.
allocation according to the two-step procedure laid down in HRET, G.R. No. 189600, 2010). .
the BANAT Decision of 21 April 2009 as clarified in this
Resolution. The continued operation of the 2% threshold Guidelines For The Election df Party List
as it applies to the allocation of the additional seats is now Representatives
unconstitutional because this threshold mathematically Three different groups may participate in the party-list
and physically prevents the filling up of the available party- system:
list seats. national parties or organizations, ·
The three-seat cap is constitutional. The three-seat cap is regional parties or organizations, and
intended by the Legislature to prevent any party from sectoral parties or organization (Atong Paglaum v.
dominating the party-list system. There is no violation of COMELEC, G.R. No. 203766, 2013). ·
the Constitution because the 1987 Constitution does not • Principle of Social Justice: The inspiration of the
require absolute proportionality for the party-list system. system is social justice understood in both the
The well-settled rule is that courts will not question the economic and political sense.
wisdom of the Legislature as long as it Is not violative of • Participation not Limited to Sectoral Groups:
the Constitution (Banal v. COMELEC, G. R. No. 119271, Participation in the system is not limited to the
2009). sectors enumerated by the Constitution or law.
• Groups must comply with Constitution and
Seat Allocation for the Party-list Representatives other applicable laws: The enumeration of
Rank all party-lists according to votes received; marginalized and under-represented sectors is not
Determine the 2% qualifiers (divide votes received by exclusive. The crucial element is not whether a
party-list by total vote) sector is specifically enumerated, but whether a
Determine the additional seats. particular organization complies with the
Deduct the number of guaranteed seats (2% qualifiers} requirements of the Constitution and RA 7941.
from the maximum allowed seats, ex. e.g. Assume there Moral disapproval, without more. is not a sufficient
are 17 with guaranteed seats (2% qualifiers) then 55 is the governmental interest to justify exclusion of
maximum allowed seats (220 :1 20%) so, 55 - 17 38 = homosexuals from participation in the party-list
... :;
seats left; system (Ang Lad/ad LG£3T Party v. COMELEC,
Divide the number of votes received by all parties G.R. No. 190582, 2010). · . ·
(qualifiers ar.d non-qualifiers) by the total number of votes • Concept of Economically Marginalized: The
cast, as in #2) and multiply the available seats (e.g., 38 enumerated sectors must be economically
seats) marginalized because that is what disables them
Distribute the additional seats (rounded down) In from successfully engaging in the political struggle.
.... . ...
accordance to the ranking. • Rule on N:itlonal and Regional Organizations:
Take note of the three seat cap. (BANAT v. COMELEC, The national and regional organizations need not be . ),
~· _.'._I
G.R. No. 179271, 2009) economically marginalized and do not need to
organize along sectoral lines but they must be
Qualifications of Party List Representatives (RA 7941, politically or ideologically disadvantaged or
Sec. 9) marginalized.
Natural born citizen of the Philippines; • Rule on purely Sectoral Parties: purely sectoral
Registered voter; parties or organizations may either be 'marginalized
Resident of the Philippines for a period of not less than 1 and underrepresented' or lacking in 'well-defined
year immediately preceding the day of the election; political constituencies'. It is enough that their ,· ...
At least 25 years of age on the day of the election (youth
~SJ)
principal advocacy pertains to the special interest
sector nominee must be at least 25 years but not more than and concerns of their sector.
30 years old on cay of election);
Able to read and write;
Page 22 of 320 "'-.......
ATENEO CENTRAL
BAR OPERATIONS 2019 POLITICAL LAW
(a) Marginalized and Underrepresented sectors: b) National, regional ar,d sectoral parties or
(HI FLOW PUV) organizations si1all not be disqualified If some
1. Handicapped ' · of their nominees are disqualified, provided
2. Indigenous Cultural Communities that they have at least one nominee who
3. Fisher Folk remains qualified.
4. Labor
5. Overseas Workers Dlsquallflcatlons: The party or organization must not be
6. Peasant disqualified under Sec 6, R.A. 7941:
7. Urban Poor religious sector;
8. Veterans advocates of violence or unlawful means of seeking its
(b) Sectors that lack 'well defined political goal;
constituencies' (PWEY) foreign party or organization;
1. Professionals receiving support from any foreign government, foreign
2. Women political party, foundation, organization, whether directly or
3. Elderly through any of its officers or
4. Youth members or indirectly through third parties for partisan
• Rule on Political Party Participation: Political election purposes;
parties can participate in party-list elections fails to comply with laws, rules or regulations relating to
provided they register under the party-list system elections;
and do not field candidates in legislative district declares untruthful statements in its petition;
elections. A political party, whether major or not, ceased to exist for at least 1 year; or fails to participate in
that fields candidates in legislative district elections the last 2 preceding elections or, fails to obtain at least 2%
can participate in party-list elections only through its of the votes cast under the party-list system in the 2
!. :7 sectoral wing that can separately register under the preceding elections for the constituency in which it has
party-list system. The sectoral wing is by itself an registered.
independent sectoral party, and is iinked to a
political party through a coalition. (Along Paglaum Note: The word "or" is a disjunctive term signifying
v. COMELEG, G.R. No. 203766, 2013) disassociation and independence of one thing from the
Its nominees must be able to contribute to the formation other things enumerated; it should, as a rule, be construed
and enactment of leqislatlon that will benefit the nation (RA in the sense in which it ordinarily implies, as a disjunctive
7941, sec. 2) · word. Thus, the plain, clear and unmistakable language of
• Rule on Nominees and Members the law provides for two (2) separate reasons for delisting.
a) The rule. 011 nominees and members coming (Philippine Guardians Brotherhood Inc. v. COMELEC,
from the sector they intent to represent G.R.No. 19052~ 2010)
applies ONLY to the sectoral parties or
C:i organizations. It is enough that a majority of The party or organization must not be an adjunct of, or a
-· project organized, or an entity funded, or assisted by the
~ the members of the sectoral parties or
;
organization must belong to the marginalized foreign government.
and underrepresented sector they represent.
The same is true· for those who lack well- Who determine whether a party represents
defined political constituencies. marginalized sector?
i. The nominees of sectoral parties or COMELEC has jurisdiction to determine whether an
organizations must either be: organization applying for the party list system represents
1. belong to their respective sectors; marginalized sector. It cannot be challenged by certiorari
or because the decision is based on facts and the SC does
2. inust have a track record of not try facts (v.C. Cadangen v. COMELEC, G.R. 177179,
advocacy for their respective 2003).
sectors
ii. The nominees of national and regional Sectoral parties are not required to adduce evidence
r-
.:
''::..
,;.~,;. parties or organizations must be bona showing their track record that they have undertaken to
fide members of such parties or further the cause of the sector they represent. It is sufficient
organizations. that their ideals are geared towards the cause of the sector
-
... ii
. Page 23 of 320
ATENEO CENTRAL
BAR OPERATIONS 2019 POLITICAL LAW
they represent (Abang-Ungkod v. COMELEC, G.R. No. District v. Party List Represeutatlves
206952, 2013).
7
Note: Filling of a vacancy in Congress falls within the
'
discretion of Congress.
Page 24 of 320
ATENEO CENTRAL
BAR OPERATIONS 2019 POLITICAL LAW
Page 25 of 320
....:,
ATENEO CENTRAL
. POLITICAL LAW
BAR OPERATIONS 2019
E. PROCESS OF LAW-MAKING It is sufficient that the title expressing the general subject
of the bill and all the provisions of the statute are germane
Bills that mustoriglnate in the House (PuP-TL) to such general subject (Sumufong v. COMELEC, G.R. No.
1. Bills authorizing the increase of Public debt. L-48609, 1941).
2. f_rivate bills.
3. Iariff bills. Bills passed by either House must pass 3 readings on
4. Bills of ,bocal application. (Sec. 24) separate days, and printed copies thereof in its final form
distributed to its members 3 days before its passage.
Bills of Local Application
A bill of local application, such as one asking for the FIRST READING - Only the title is read; the bill is passed
conversion of a municipality into a city, is deemed to have to the proper committee
originated from t~,e Hcuse provided that the bill of the
House was filed prior to the filing of the bill in the Senate; SECOND READING· Entire text is read and debates are
even if in the end, the Senate approved its own version held; amendments introduced.
(Tolentino v. Secretary of Finance, G.R. No. 115455,
1995). THIRD READING - Only the title is read, no amendments
are allowed. Vote shall be taken immediately thereafter
Private Bills and the yeas and nays entered In the Journal.
One affecting purely private interest, such as one granting
a franchise. Exceptions:
When the President certifies to the necessity of the bill's
Tariff Bill immediate enactment to meet a public calamity or
One that specifies the rates or duties to be imposed on emergency, the 3 readings can be held on the same day
imported articles When the offices of the President and Vice-President are
both vacant, the bill calling for a special election to elect a
Bill Authorizing Increase of the Public Debt ., President and Vice-President is deemed certified. (Art. VU,
One which creates public indebtedness such as bills for the Set. 10).
issuance of bonds and other forms of obligations
Specific Limitations
Revenue Bills No law shall be enacted increasing the Supreme Court's
One specifically designed to raise money or revenue appellate jurisdiction without the SC's advice and
through imposition or levy. concurrence. (Sec. 30)
• For example, registration fees used for the cor istructon No law shall be enacted granting titles of royalty or nobility.
and maintenance of highways. (PAL vs. Edu, G.R. No. (Sec. 31)
L-41383, 1QBB).
• The Videogram Regulatory Board Law imposing a tax Operative Fact Doctrine
on video rentals does not make the law a revenue bill • The Operative Fact Doctrine is a rule of equity that
because the purpose is primarily r&gulation, and not to provides that a law produces effects until it is declared
raise revenue. (Tio v. Videogram Regulatory Board, unconstitutional. As such, it must be applied as an
G.R. No. L-75697, 1987) . exception to the general rule that an unconstitutional
law produces no effects.
General Limitations (Sec. 26) • It can never be invoked to validate as constitutional an
Every bill shall embrace only one (1) subject, as expressed unconstitutional act. The unconstitutional law remains
in the title thereof, which does not have to be a complete unconstitutional. but its effects, prior to its judicial
catalogue of everything stated in the bill. declaration of nullity, may be left undisturbed as a
matter of equity and fair play.
An Act creating the Videogram Regulatory Board included
30% tax on gross receipts on video transactions was held Exc&ption:
to be valid. Taxation is sufficiently related to regulation of The doctrine of operative fact does not always apply, and
the video industry (Tio v. Videogram Regulatory Board, Is not always the consequence of every declaration of
G.R. No. L-75697, 1987). constitutional invalidity. It can be invoked only in situations
;;
, .•
;.
,I where the nullification of the effects of what used to be a
Page 27 of 320 .
~.J}
ATENEO CENTRAL
BAR OPERATIONS 2019 POLITICAL LAW
valid law would result in inequity and injustice; but where "amendment in the nature of a substitute," so long as such
no such result would · ensue, the general rule that an amendment is germane to the subject of the bills before
unconstitutional law is totally ineffective should apply. the oommittee. After all, its report was not final but needed
(Arau/lo v. Aquino Ill, G.R. No. 209287, July 1, 2014) the approval of both houses of Congress to become valid
as an act of the legislative department (Tolentino v:
An unconstitutional law is void and produces no rights, Secretary of Finance, G.R. No. 115455, 1994).
duties, and affords no protection. Being void, Fertiphil is
not required to pay the levy and all levies paid should be PRESIDENTIAL VETO
refunded in accordance with !he general civil code principle Every bill passed by Congress shall be presented to the
against unjust enrichment. Post operatlvs fact doctrine President before it becomes law. To approve, he shall sign
cannot be invoked i~ it will constitute an unjust enrichment. it. Otherwise, he shall veto the bill. (Sec. 27 (1))
In the case of Planters v. Fertiphil, the tax on fertilizers had
already been collected and applied to · a private OVERRIDING A VETO .
corporation's needs. This was by virtue of the law imposing . The President shall transmit to House where the bill
the tax. If the operative fact doctrine would be applied in origina~ed. If, after such reconsideration, 213 of all the
this case it would sanction the enrichment of the Planters members of such House shall agree to pass the bill, it shall
Product at the expense of the Fertiphil. (Planters Products, be sent, togethor with the objections, to the other House
Inc. v. FertiPhi/ Corporation, 548 SCRA 485) by which it shall likewise be reconsidered, and if approved
by 2/3 of all the members of that House, it shall become
BICAMERAL CONFERENCE COMMITTEE - an extra- law.
constitutional creation which is intended to resolve conflicts To override the veto, at least 2/3 of all the members of
between House and Senate versions of bills. (Bernas, · each House must agree to pass the bill. In such case, the
1987 Philippine Constitution: A Commentary, 790, 2009). veto is overridden and becomes a law without need of
presidential approval. (Sec. 27 (1)) '-·
Scope Of The Bicameral Conference commucee's
Powers: (A2R2P) ITEM VETO
Adopt the Bill entirely; or General Rule: As a gener2I rule, if the President
Amend; or disapproves vf a provision in a bill approved by congress,
Revise; or he must veto the entire bill.
Reconcile the House Bill and the Senate Bills;
fropose entirely new provisions not found in either the Exception: As an exception, he is allowed in the case of
House Bili or the Senate Bill. (Amendments in the nature (1) appropriation, (2) revenue, and (3) tariff bills to
of a subsntute) exercise Item-veto. (Sec. 27 (2)). s
1-.
Limitation: So long as the amendment is germane to the Exceptions to the Exception: r··
(
v;
subject of the bill before the Committee. DOCTRINE OF INAPPROPRIATE PROVISIONS - A
provision that is constitutionally inappropriate for an c:
\ ..
In a bicameral system, bills are lndependenny processed appropriation bill may be subject to veto even _if it is not an
by both Houses of Congress. It is not unusual that the final appropriation or revenue "item';. (Gonzalez v. Macaraig,
version approved by one House differs from what has been Jr., G.R. No. 87636, 1990J.
approved by the other, The "conference committee," EXECUTIVE IMPOUNDMENT- Refusal of the President to
consisting of members nominated from both Houses, is an spend funds already· allocated by Congress for a specific
extra-constitutional creation of Congress whose function purpose. It is in effect, an "impoundment" of the law
is to propose to Congress ways of reconciling conflicting allocating such expendlturs of funds.
provisions found in the Senate version and in the House Note:
version of a bill. There is no doctrine for or against executive
impoundment. It has not been judicially questioned.
It is within the power of ci conference committee to include
in its report an entirely new provision that is not found either
in the House blll or in the Senate bill. If the committee can
propose an amendment consisting of one or two
provisions, there is no reason why It cannot propose
several provisions, collectively considered as an
Page 28 of 320
ATENEO CENTRAL
BAR OPERATIONS 2019 POLITICAL LAW
Exception: An enrolled bill prevails over the contents of Neither House during the sessions of the Congress, shall
the Journal. without the consent of the other, adjourn tor more than 3
days, nor to any other place than that in which the two
ENROLLED BILL - The official copy of approved Houses shall be sit!ing. (CONST., Art. VI, Sec.16, Par(5))
legislation and bears the certifications of the pr9siding
officers of each House. Thus, where the certifications are Types of Adjournment
valid and are not withdrawn, the contents of the enrolled 1. Day to day
bill are conclusive upon the courts as regards the provision 2. Yearly
of that particular bill. 3. Sine die - with no appointed date for resumption
For the cffectivity of 2/3 of All Sec. 21, Art. Majority of Both Art. VII,
treaty or VII Confirmation of new Houses, voting Sec. 9
international VP nominated by separately
agreement President
Conviction in 2/3 of Al( Sec. 3(6},
Impeachment . I Art. XI Determination that 2/3 of Both Art. VII,
Pres. Unable to Houses, voting Sec. 11 '
\....
discharge powers & separately
duties t: .•
Page 30 of 320
ATENEO CENTRAL
BAR OPE:RATIO~S 2019 POLITICAL LAW
Page 31 of 320
......_..;;
ATENEO CENTRAL
BAR OPERATIONS 2019 POUTICAL LAW
delegability is violated sfnce the power to Exception: The following may, by law, be authorized to
appropriate is done by law and lodged with augment any item in the general appropriations law for
Congress collectively and not with its individual
'
members (
<....... •
Page 32 of 320 ·
ATENEO CENTRAL
BAR OPERATIONS 2019 POLITICAL LAW
their respective offices from savings in other items of their made available every quarter or at such time as the DBM
respective appropriatlons.8 ,may prescribe, actual revenue surplus may be determined
President accordingly and release from unprogrammed funds may
Senate President take place even before year end. The exercise of the
Speaker of the House of Representatives powe,· to augment shall be strictly construed by virtue of its
Chief Justice of the Supreme Court bein~ an exception to the general rule that the funding of
Heads of the Constitutional Commissions PAPs shall be limited to the amount fixed by Congress for
the purpose. (Arau/lo v. Aquino, G.R. No. 209287, 2015)
The requisites for the valid transfer of appropriated
funds under Sec. 25 (5}: Discretionary Funds of Particular Officials:
There is a law authorizing the President, Senate President, - Disbursed only for public purposes
Speaker, Chief Justice, and heads of the Constitutional - Should be supported by appropriate vouchers
Commissions; - Subject to guidelines as may be prescribed by law ( Sec.
The funds to be transferred are savings generated from the 25 (6)).
appropriations for their respective offices; and
The purpose of the transfer is to augment an Item in the Automatic Re-Appropriation
general appropriations law for their respective offices. If Congress fails to pass the General Appropriations Bill
(GAB) by the end of any fiscal year, the GA law for the
Considering the above requisites, the following preceding fiscal year is deemed reenacted. 1t will remain in
activities under the OAP are unconstitutional: force and effect until Congress passes the GAB (Sec. 25
The withdrawal of unobligated allotments from the (7)).
implementing agencies and the declaration of the
withdrawn unobligated allotments and unreleased H. LEGISLATIVE INQUIRIES AND OVERSIGHT
appropriations as savings prior to the end of the fiscal year FUNCTIONS
and without complying with the statutory definition of Scope
savings contained. in the General Appropriations Act; The power of legislative investigation includes:
(1) The power to issue summons and notices;
Unobligated allotments were encompassed by the first part (2) Power to punish or declare a person in contempt
of the definition of "savings" in the GAA, that is, as "portions (3) The power to determine the rules of its proceedings
or balances of any programmed appropriation in this Act
free from any obligation or encumbrance." However, NBC Legislative Inquiries (Sec. 21}
No. 541 (Authority of DBM to withdraw unobligated Legislative inquiries must be conducted "in aid of
allotments) did not set in dear terms the criteria for the legislation" which does nc1t necessarily mean that there is
withdrawal of unobllgated allotments. It only specified that. pending legislation regarding the subject of the inquiry.
,,--,
'. .:
the withdrawal of unubllgated allotments will be for those Hence. the materiality of a question is determined not by
"slow- moving projects" in order "to fund priority and/or its connection to any pending legislation, but by its
. fast-moving programs/projects." The problern is that such connection to the general scope of the inquiry .
withdrawn money does not satisfy the category of being a
saving since it is not technically considered as abandoned If the investigation is no longer "in did of legislation" but, "in
or discontinued project aid of prosecution" where the stated purpose of the
investigation is, to determine the existence of violations of
Cross-border transfers of savings of the executive the law, it is beyond the scope of congressional powers.
department to offices outside the executive department;
Funding of projects, activities, programs not covered by The sub judice rule does not apply to inquiries in aid of
appropriations in the General Appropriations Act (Araullo legislation. The Senate Rules of Procedure Governing
v. Aquino, G.R. No. 209287, 2014). · Inquiries in Aid of legislation provide that the filing or
pendency of any prosecution of criminal or administrative
Savings could be generated only when the purpose of the action should not stop or abate any inquiry to carry out a
appropriation is fulfilled, or when the need for the legislative purpose. Hence, no individual can escape the
appropriation being no longer existent. However, since power of the Senate to investigate, even if he or she has a
information on actual revenue collections and targets are
•.j
ATENEO CENTRAL
BAR OPERATIONS 2019 POLITICAL LAW
pending administrative or criminal case (Sabio v. Gordon, their appearance upon Congr6ss. This is in line with the
G.R. No. 174340, 2006). principle of separation of powers.
ENFORCEMENT - While the Constitution does not Department heads may appear before Congress in the
expressly vest Congress with the power to punish non- following instances: .
members for legislative contempt, the power has Upon their own · initiative, with the consent of the
nevertheless been invoked by the legislative body as a President (and that of the House concerned}
means of preserving its authority and dignity. (Arnau/t v, - Upon the request of either House
Nazareno, G.R. No. L-3820, 1950) - Written questions shall be submitted to the President of
the Senate or Speaker of the House at least 3 days before
Note: the scheduled appearance of the department heads.
The principle that Congress or any of its bodies has the lnterpellations shall not be limited to written questions,
power to punish recalcitrant witnesses is founded upon but may cover related matters.
reason and policy. Said power must be considered implied The inquiry will be conducted in executive session
or incidental to the exercise of legislative power. (Negros when:
Orientai II Electric Cooperative Inc. v. Sangguniang > Required by the security of state, or public interest,.
Panlungsod of Dumaguete, G.R. No. L-72492, 1987) and ·
> When the President so states in writing.
The continuance of such incarceration only subsists for the
lifetime, or term, of such body. Thus, for each House it lasts The Permissible Powers o't Congressional Oversight
for only 3 years; but, if the Senf•te incarcerates a witness, Scrutiny based primarily on Congress' power of
the term is indefinite. The Senate, with its staggered terms, appropriation and the budget hearings conducted in
is a continuing body. connection with it, its power to ask heads of departments
to appear before and be heard by either of its Houses on
The exercise by Congress or by any of its committees of any matter pertaining to their departments and its power of
its contempt power is based on the principle oi self- confirmation; and Investigation and monitoring of the
preservation. As the branch of the government vested with implementation of laws pursuant to the power of Congress
the legislative power, independently of the judicial branch, to conduct inquiries in aid of legislation (Be/gica v.
it can assert its authority and punish contumacious acts Ochoa, G.R. No. 208566, 2013).
against it. Such power is sui generis, as it attaches not to
the discharge of legislative functions per se, but to the A third power, the review of implementing rules and
sovereign character of the legislature as one of the three regulations, · is unconstitutional. Any provision that
independent and coordinate branches of government. empowers Congress or any of its members to play any role
(Standard Chartered v. Senate, G.R. No. 167173, 2007). in the implementation or enforcement of the law violates
separation of powers. /'•;
" I
\
Limitations: (ADR)
1) The inquiry must be in Aid of legislation. There is no such thing as a 'question hour' in the
2) The inquiry must be conducted in accordance with the. Constitution (It ls a parliamentary concept and practice).
'Q.uly published rules of procedure' of the House The distinction in legislative hearings is between ., '
conducting the inquiry; and investigative function and oversight function.
3) The rights of persons appearing in or affected by such
inquiries shall be .Respected. (e.g., right against self- The mere filing of a criminal or an administrative complaint
incrimination) (Bemas, 1987 Philippine Constitution: A before a court or a quasi-judicial body should not
Commentary, 761, 2009). automatically bar the conduct of legislative investigation.
The exercise of sovereign legislative authority, of which the
Oversight Functions (Sec. 22) power of legislative inquiry is an essential component,
Question Hour- Appearance of department heads before cannot be made subordinate to a criminal or an
Congress to give account of their stewardship (Bernas, administrative investigation (Standard Chartered v.
1987 Philippine Constitution: A Commentary, 769, 2(:09). Senate, G.R. No. 167173, 2007). -'-..::Y
, ....,.
Under Section 22, department heads (members of the , It is incumbent upon the Senate to publish the rules for its I ·.
Executive Department) cannot be compelled to appear legislative inquiries in each Congress or otherwise make \ ..~~
before Congress. Neither may department heads Impose the published rules clearly state that the same shall be
Page 34 of 320
ATENEO CENTRAL
BAR OPERATIONS 2019 POLITICAL LAW
chief, and that as a consequence a military officer who The penalty imposable shall be limited to
defies such injunction is liable under military justice. The removal from office and .
only way to circumvent this is by judicial order because the disqualification to hold any office under the Republic of the
President may be commanded by judicial order to compel Philippine (Soc. 3(7)).
the attendance of the military officer. Final judicial orders
have the force of the law of the land which the President Officers Sl•bject to Impeachment (Sec. 2j (VSCO-P)
has the duty to faithfully execute (Gudani v. Senga, G.R. fresident .
No. 170165, 2006). YJce President
., Members of the §C
Inquiries in aid of leqlslation aim to elicit information that Members of the ~onstitutio.nal Commissions
may be used for legislation, while "question hour" pertains Qmbudsman ·
to the power to conduct inquiries, the object of which is to
obtain Information in pursuit of Congress' oversight Grounds for Impeachment (Sec. 2) (GOT2 BGC)
function. Culpable violation of the ,Gonstitution
!reason
When Congress merely seeks to be Informed on how §ribery
department heads are implementing the statutes which it Qraft and Corruption
has issued, its right to such information is not asimperative Betrayal of Public !rust
as that of the President to whom, as Chief Executive, such Qther high crimes
department heads must give a report of their performance
as a matter of duty. In such instances, Section 22 of Article J. ELECTORAL TRIBUNALS AND THE COMMISSION
VI, in keeping with the separation of powers, states that ON APPOINTMENTS
Congress may only request their appearance.
Nonetheless, when the inquiry In which Congress requires ELECTORAL TRIBUNALS (Sec. 17) .
their appearance is "in aid of legislation" under Section 21, The Senate and the House shall each have an Electoral
Article VI, the appearance is mandatory (Senate v. Ermita, Tribunal.
G.R. No. 169777, 2006). Composition
3 Supreme Court Justices to be designated by the Chief
I. POWER OF IMPEACHMENT Justice.
6 Members of the Senate or House, as the case may be.
Power of impeachment (Article XI) They shall be chosen on the basis of proportional
Exclusive Power To Initiate representation from the political parties and party-list
The House of Representatives shall have the exclusive organizations.
i._ -i
power to initiate all cases of impeachment (Sec. 3 (1)).. The senior Justice in the Electoral Tribunal shall be its
• The impeachment proceedings begin with :3 complaint Chairman.
filed with the House of Representatives either by a
member of the House or by any citizen supporter' by a Nature of Tribunals
resolution of endorsement by any member. The Non-partisan court. It must be independent of Congress
complaint is referred to a Committee which prepares a , and devoid of partisan influence and consideration.
report (which can be favorable or unfavorable). In Disloyalty to lhe party and breach of party discipline are not
either case, the House by a vote of 1/3 of all its valid grounds for the expulsion of a member. (Bondoc v.
members decides whether complaint should be given Pineda, GR No. 97710, September 26, 1991)
due course. (Sec. 3(2-3)).
• Referral to the Committee and decision by the House Security of Tenure
is unnecessary if the complaint is filed by at ieast 1/3 of Membership in the HRET may not be terminated except for
all the members of the house (Sec 3(4)). · a just cause, such as the expiration of the member's
congressional term of office, his death, permanent
Exclusive power to try and decide disability, resignation from the political party he represents
The Senate shall have the sole power to try and decide all in the tribunal, formal affiliation with another political party,
cases of impeachment. No person shall be convicted · or removal for other valid cause. A member may not be
without the concurrence of 2/3 of all the Members of the expelled by the HOR for 'party disloyalty' short of proof that
Senate (Sec. 3 (6)). he has fonrnally affiliated with another political group. ,...:.·
(Pimentel v. HRET)
Page 36 of 320
ATENEO CENTRAL
BAR OPERATIONS 2019 POLITICAL LAW
Page 37 of 320
. .. /
. ,'
I:~_.:
ATENEO CENTRAL
BAR OPERATIONS 2019 POLITICAL LAW
Jurisdiction
Commission on Appointments shall confirm the
appointments by the President with respect to the following
positions: (E·MA2-C)
- Heads of the gxecutlve DepartmentG
Exception: Appointment of Vice President as a member .
of the Cabinet needs no confirmation (PHIL. CONST. Art
VII, §15)
- ,8mbassadors,
(}
- Other public .Ministers or consuls
Officers of the AFP from the rank of Colonel or Naval
Captain and above; and ·
Other officers whose appointments are vested in him
by the ~onstitution {e.g. COMELEC members)
• Examples:
o Chairmen and commissioners of the CSC,
COMELEC, and COA
(]1
o Regular members of the Judicial Bar Council
Term of Office
The President and Vice President shall be elected by direct
vote of the people for a term of 6 years. (CONST. Art. VII,
Sec.4)
.·· f. Election
·. .;· 1. Regular: 2nd Monday of May, every 6 years
2. Special (Requisites)
a. Death, permanent disability, removal from
office or resignation of both President and
Vice-President
Page 39 of 320
.. ,
ATENEO CENTRAL
BAR OPERATIONS 2019 POLITICAL LAW
b. Vacancies occur more than 18 months before iii. Participating in any business.
the next regular presldential election; and iv. Being financially interested in any
c. A law passed by Congress calling for a special contract with, or in any franchise,
election to elect a President and Vice or special privilege granted by the
President to be held not earlier than 45 days government or any subdivision,
nor tater 60 days from the time of such call agency or instrumentality thereof,
(CONST. Art. VII, Sec.10) including GOCCs or their
subsidiaries. (Art. VII, Sec. 13)
Congress as Canvassing Board
The proclamation of presidential and vice presidential Spouses and Cannot be appointed during
winners is a function of Congress and not of the :.tth degree president's tenure as:
COMELEC (Macalintal v COMEL£C, GR No. 157013, relatives of the 1. Members of the Constitutional
June 10, 2003) President Commissions
( consanguinity 2. Office of the Ombudsman
SC as the Presidential Electoral Tribunal (PET) '- or affinity) 3. Department Secretaries
The SC, sitting en bane, shall be the sole judge of all 4. Department Under-secretaries
contests relating to the election, returns and qualifications 5. Chairman or heads of bureaus or
of the President or Vice President, and may promulgate its offices including GOCCs and their
rules for the purpose. (Macalintaf v PET, GR No. 191618, subsidiaries.
November 23, 2010)
If the spouse, etc., was already in any
Oath of Office of the above offices before his/ her
Before they enter on the execution of their office, the spouse became President, he/ she
President, Vice-President or the Acting President shall may continue in office. What is
take the oath or affirmation (CONST. Art. Vfl, Sec.5) prohibited is appolntrnent and
reappointment, not continuation in
B. PRIVILEGES. INHIBITIONS, AND office.
DISQUALIFICATJONS
Spouses, etc., can ba appointed to the
Disquallfications: judiciary and as ambassadors and
SUBJECT SOURCEOF DISQUALIFICATION consuls.
I
"-...::
other emoluments therefor. review of the CPLC (Public Interest Group v. Elma, G.R.
(e.g., Sec. of Finance is head of No. 138965, 2006). { '.",
t._ ..: .•
Monetary Board)
ii. Practicing, directly or indirectly,
any other profession during their
tenure.
Page 40 of 320
ATENEO CENTRAL
BAR OPERATIONS 2019 POLITICAL LAW
Exception to the prohibition on the President and performed in the exercise of official duties. (Estrada v.
his/her official family from holding any other office or Desierlo, GR No. 146710, March 2, 2001)
employment
if 4th degree relatives are already in office when a A department secretary, even if an alter ego of the
President assumes office, the relatives are not thereby President, cannot invoke presidential immunity in a case
ousted from their positions. What is prohibited is filed against him because the questioned acts are not the
appointment or reappointment and not uninterrupted acts of the President. (Gloria v CA, GR No. 119903, August
continuance in office 15, 2000)
'
; .::r Page 41 of 320
' J
..... ,.•,/
ATENEO CENTRAL
BAR OPERATIONS 2019 POLITICAL LAW
The President's generalized assertion of privilego must the commander-in-chief clause, the rower to grant
yield to the demonstrated, specific need for evidence in a reprieves, commutations and pardons, the power to grant
pending criminal trial. (U.S. v. Nixon, 418 U.S. 683, 1974). amnesty with the concurrence of Congress, the power to
Executive privilege cannot be used to conceal a crime or a contract or guarantee foreign loans, the power to enter into t.... ,..,·'
possible wrongdoing. Thus, the specific need for evidence treaties or international agreements, the power to submit
in a pending cdrninat trial outweighs the President's the budget to Congress, and the power to address
generalized interest in confidentiality (Neri v. Ermita, G.R. Congress.
No. 169777, 2006). . ...,,,,
Page 42 of 320
ATENEO CENTRAL
BAR OPERATIONS 2019 POLITICAL LAW
The President's Executive powers are not limited to those that the designation was in a temporary capacity. The
set forth in the Constitution. The President has residual ..Constitution makes no reference to the nature of the
powers as the Chief Executive of the country. which. designation (Fune v. Agra, G.R. No. 191644, 2013).
powers include others not set forth in the Constitution
(Marcos v. Manglapus, G.R. No. 88211, 1989). Kinds of Presidential Appointments untler Sec.15
a. Appointments made by an acting president
Power of Administrative Reorganization b. Midnight appoint -appointment made by a President
The President has the continuing authority to reorganize after the election of his successor and up to the end of
the national government, which includes the JJOWer to his term. This type of appointment is prohibited by the
group, consolidate bureaus and agencies, to abolish Constitution.
offices, to transfer functions, to create and classify c. Appointments for Partisan Political Consideration.
functions, services and activities and to standardize Those made 2 months before the next Presidential
salaries and materials, if effected in good faith and for the election. This is prohibited by the Constitution.
purpose of economy or make the Jureaucracy more d. Regular presidential appointments, with or without
efficient. (MEWAP v Executive Secretary, GR No 160093, confirmation by the Commission on Appolntments, and
July 31, 2007) 'recess' or 'ad-interim' appointments.
-------------------·-- ·-·-
ATENEO CENTRAL
BAR OPERATIONS 2019 POLITICAL LAW
(Calderor. v. Carale, G.R. No. 91636, 1992). e.g. NLRC appointment of Membe-s of the Supreme Court, they
Commissioners, Bangko Sentral Governor. could have explicitly done so. That such specification
was not done only reveals that the prohibition against
PROCEDURE WHEN CA CONFIRMATION NEEDED: . the President or Acting President making appointments
1. Nomination by President within two months before the next presidential
2. Confirmation by CA elections and up to the end of the President's or Acting
3. Appointment by President President's term does not refer to the Members of the
4. Acceptance by appointee. Supremo Court. The usage in Section 4 (1), Article VIII
• At any time before all four steps have been of the word shall - an imperative, operating to impose
complied with, the President can withdraw the a duty that may be enforced - should not be
nomination or appointment. disregarded.
• The framers did not need to extend the prohibition
Procedure When No CA Confirmation Needed: against midnight appointments to appointments In the
1. Appointment , Judiciary, because the establishment of the JBC and
2. Acceptance subjecting the nomination and screening of candidates
for judicial positions to the unhurried and deliberate
Once appointee accepts, President can no longer prior process of the JBC ensured that there would no
withdraw the appointment longer be midnight appointments to the Judiciary. JBC
intervention eliminates the danger that appointments to
(c) Midnight Appolntments the Judiciary can be made for the purpose of buying
General Rule: Two (2) months immediately before the votes in a coming presidential election, or of satisfying
next Presidential elections and up to the end of his term, partisan considerations. The creation of the JBC was
the President or Acting President shall not make precisely intended to de-politicize the Judiciary by
appcintments. This is to prevent the practice of making doing away with the Intervention of the Commission on
"midnight appointments." Appointments (De Castro v. JBC, G.R. No. 191002,
2010).
Exception: Temporary appointments to executive
positions if continued vacancies will prejudice public Power of Removal
service or endanger public safety.
General Rule: The express power of appointment of the
• Prohibition does not extend to appointments in the
President has the corollary lrnpliod power of removal.
Supreme Court. Had the framers intended to extend
Hence, the President may remove appointees.
the prohibition to the appointment of Members of the
Supreme Court, they could have explicitly done so. The
Exception: Appointments requiring certain methods for
prohibition is confined to appointments In the Executive
removal (e.g., Impeachment, appointment of judges of
Department. Existence of the JBC also prevents
inferior courts (Phil Const. art. VIII, § 11; Gonzales Ill vs.
possible abuses in appointment (De Castro v JBC,
Office of the President of the Philippines, G.R. No. 196231,
G.R. No. 191002, April 20, 2010); overturned (In re:
2012).
Appointment of Valenzuela, AM 98-0501 SC, 1998).
• There Is no law that prohibits local elective officials
The succeeding President may not revoke appointments
from makinqappolntments during the last days of his
to the Judiciary made by an Acting President. Sec. ~4, Art.
. or her tenure'. Prohibition only applies to appointments
r-. ·r: VII refers only to appointments in tho Executive
·-...:~ )
by the President (De la Rama v. CA, G.R. No. 131136,
Department. It has no application to appointments in the
2001).
Judiciary because temporary or acting appointments can
• If the President is not satisfied with the list submitted only undermine the judlciary due to their being revocable
by the JBC, he may ask for another list. But once the at will ... Prior to their mandatory retirement or resignation,
appointment is issued by the President and accepted judges of the first or second level courts and the Justices
by the nominee, it needs no further confirmation.
of the third level courts may only be removed for cause, but
• President may appoint SC Justice within 60 days prior the members of the Supreme Court may be removed only
to election. Article Vil deals entirely with the executive by impeachment (De Castro v. JBC, G.R. No. 191002,
department while Article VIII deals with the judiciary. 2010).
Had the framers intended to extend the 60-day
.:. . . . r· prohibition contained in Section 15, Article Vil to the
Page 45 of 320
ATENEO CENTRAL
BAR OPERATIONS 2019
POLITICAL LAW
The President cannot dismiss the Deputy Ombudsman The execution of laws is an OBLIGAT!ON of the President.
because it will unde,·mine the independence of the He cannot suspend theoperation of laws.
Ombudsman. However, the same rule does not apply to
the special prosecutor, which can be dismissed by the (a) Doctrine of Qualified Political Agency or Alter Ego
President. (Gonzales v. OP, G.R. No. 203372, 2014) Principle
While the President may remove from office those ·who are Exceptions:
not entitled to security of tenure. or those officers with no If the acts are disapproved or reprobated by the President.
set terms, such as Department Heads, the officers, and If the President is required to act in person by law or by the
employees entitled to security of tenure cannot be Constitution (e.g. the power to grant pardons).
summarily removed from office.
(b) Executive Departments and Offices
Power of Control
The power of an officer to alter, modify, or set aside what The President may, by executive or adrninistrative order,
a subordinate officer has done in the performance of his direct the reorganization of government entities under the
duties, and to substitute the judgment of the officer for that Executive Department. Section 17, Article Vil of the 1987
of his subordinate. Constitution, clearly states: "The President shall have
control of all executive departments, bureaus and offices."
The President's power of control is a self-executing The Administrative Code also grants the President the
provision. The incurnbent President is free to amend, power to reorganize the Office of the President in ·
rescind and modify any political agreements entered into recognition of the recurring need of every President to
by the previous Presidents (Ocampo v. Enriquez, G.R. No. reorganize his or her office "to achieve simplicity, economy
225973, 2016). and efficiency" (Tondo Medical v. Court of Appeals, G.R.
No. 167324, 2007).
The appeal from the decision of a Department Secretary to
the President can be restricted due to the President's The President may transfer any agency under the Office of
power of control. It may be limited by executive order of the the President to any other department or agency, subject
President, a law providing for judicial review, and a rule of to the poiicy in the Executive Office and in order to achieve : '
'~. ::
procedure promulgated by the Supreme Court. (Angeles v. · simplicity, economy and efficiency (Anak Mindanao v.
Gaite, G.R. No. 165276, 2009). Executive Secretary, G.R. No. 166052, 2007).
(;
Power of Supervision The creation of the Truth Commission does not fall within t: ..
\.,,
The power of a superior officer to ensure that the laws are the President's power to reorganize. It flows from the
faithfully executed by subordinates. · faithful-execution clause of the Constitution under Article
' VII, Section 17 thereof. One of the recognized powers of
The power of supervision does not include the power of the President is the power to create ad hoc committees.
control; but the power of control necessarily includes the This flows from the need to ascertain facts and determine
power of supervision. if laws have been faithfully executed or guide the President
in performing his duties relative to the execution and
The President's power over GOCCs comes not from the enforcement of laws. The Truth Commission will not
Constitution but from statute. Hence. it may similarly be supplant the Ombudsman or the Department of Justice or
taken away by statute. erode their respective powers. The investigative function
of the Commission will complement those of the two offices
For Administrative Proceedings, decisions of Department (Biraogo v. The Philippine Troth Commission of 2010 I
Secretaries need not be appealed to the President in order Rep. Edee/ C. Lagman, et al. v. Exec. Sec. Paquito N.
to comply with the requirement of exhaustion of
administrative remedies.
;
. ;. '
Page 46 of 320 "-..../
-------------·-
ATENEO CENTRAL
BAR OPERATIONS 2G19 POLITICAL LAW
Ochoa, Jr., et al., G.R. No. 192935 & G.R. No. 19303, While the suspension of the privilege of writ and the
2010).9 proclamation of martial law is subject to judicial reviow, the
actual use by the President of the armed forces is not.
(c) Local Government Units Thus, troop deployments in times of war are subject to the
The power of the president over local government units is President's judgment and discretion.
only of general supervision. He can interfere with the
actions of their executive heads only if these are contrary Limitations:
to law. 1. Suspension or proclamation is effective for only 60
days.
President exercises direct supervision over autonomous 2. W!thin 48 hours from the declaration or suspension. the
regions, provinces, and independent cities. President must submit a report in person or in writing
to Congress.
To facilitate the exercise of power of general supervision 3. Congress, voting jointly, by a vote of at lsast c1 majority,
of local government, the President may merge may revoke the same, and the Fresident cannot set
administrative regions and transfer the regional center to aside the revocation.
Koronadal City from Cotabato City (Republic v. Bayao, 4. In the same manner, upon the President's initiative,
G.R. NO. 179492, 2013). Congress may extend the proclamation or suspension
for a period determined by Congress if:
MILITARY/EXTRAORDINARY POWERS a. Invasion or rebellion persists, and
b. Public safety requires it
Scope (Sec. 18)
As Commander-in-Chief of the Armod Forces, whenever Congress CANNOT extend the period motu proprio.
necessary, the President may call out the Armed Forces
\,,.! to: Duty of President to report to Congress
PREVENT or SUPPRESS Section 18, Article VII, requires the President to report his
1. Lawless violence -, actions to Congress, in person or in writing, within 48
2. Invasion hours of such proclamation or suspension. In turn, the
3. Rebellion Congress is required to convene without need of a call
He may also: within 24 hours following the Presidents proclamation or
1. Suspend the privilege of the writ of habeas corpus suspension. Clearly, the Constitution calls for quick action
2. Proclaim a state of martial law on the part of the Congress. Whatever form that action
takes, therefore, should give the Court sufficient time to
Grounds For The Suspension Of The Prlvileqe Of The fulfill its own mandate to review the factual basis of the
Writ Of Habeas Corpus And Declaration Of Martial proclamation or suspension within 30 days of its issuance.
Law (Fortun v. Arroyo, G.R. No. 190293, 2012)
Actual, and not merely imminent
Invasion Supreme Court Review
'.
Rebellion; and 1. In an appropriate proceeding flied by any citizen;
Public safety requires it 2. The SC may review the sufficiency of the factual
~ ;.
. \. . ./' basis of the proclamation or suspension, or the
Effects of Suspension of Writ extension thereof.
1. Proclamation does not affect the right to bail; 3. Its decision must be promulgated within 30 days from
2. Suspension applies only to persons facing charges of filing.
( '"..
rebellion or offenses inherent in or directly connected
with invasion; In reviewing the sufficiency of the factual basis Of the
3. Persons arrested must be charged within 3 days, if not proclamation or suspension, the Court considers only the
they must bereleased: and information and data available to the President prior to, or
4. Proclamation does not supersede civilian authority at tho time of the declaration; it is not allowed to "undertake
an independent investigation beyond the pleadings.ff On
9 Note: The main defect seen in tho Truth Commission was the
the other hand, Congrnss may trike into consideration not Judicial Power to Review vs. Congressional Power to
only data available prior to, but likewise events Revoke Martial Law and Suspension of the Writ of
supervening the declaration. Unlike the Court which does Habeas Corpus
not look into the absolute correctness of the factual basis Judicial flower to review Congressional Power to
as will be discussed below, Congress could probe deeper revoke
and further; it can delve into th€:l accuracy of the facts
presented before it. (Lagman v. Medialdea, G.R. No. Court can only refer to Ccngress may take into
231658, 2017) . information available to the consideration:
President prior to or at the • Data available to the
Section 18, Article VII itself sets the parameters for time of the declaration President prior to or at
determining the sufficiency of the factual basis for the the time of the
declaration of rnartiai law and/or the suspension of the Court is not allowed to declaration and
privilege of the writ of habeas corpus, "namely (1) actual undertake en independent • Events supervening
invasion or rebellion, and (2) public safety requires the investigation beyond the the declaration
exercise of such power." Without the concurrence of the pleadings
two conditions, the President's declaration of martial law
and/or suspension of the privilege of the writ of habeas Does not look into the Can probe further and
corpus must be struck down. What the President needs to absolute correctness of the deeper, can delve into
satisfy is only the standard of probable cause for a valid factual basis accuracy of facts
declaration of martial law and suspension of the privilege presented before it
of writ of habeas corpus. (Id.)
Passive power Automatic
Martial Law Does Not Initiated by filing of a May be activated by
Suspend the operation of the Constitution petition "in an appropriate Congress itself at any time
Supplant the functioning of the civil courts or legif,lative proceeding" by a citizen after ths proclamation or
assemblies
suspension was made
Authorize conferment of jurisdiction on military courts over
civilians where civil courts are able to function " (Lagman v. At,ed1a/dea, G.R. No. 231658, July 4, 2017)
Automatically suspend the privilege of the writ of habeas
corpus Declaration Of State Rebellion
The factual necessity of calling out the armed forces is
The scope of the Supreme Court's power to review the something that is for the President to decide, but the Court
declaration of Martial Law or suspension of the writ of may look into the factual basis of the declaration to ( ..
habeas corpus is limited to a determination of the determine if it was done with grave abuse of discretion ,...
sufficiency of the factual basis of such declaration or amounting to lack of jurisdiction (IBP v. Zamora, G.R. No.
suspension. (Lagman v. Medla/dea, G.R. No. 231658, July 141284, 2000).
4, 2017)
Judicial inquiry can go no further than to satisfy the Court
not that the President's decision is correct but that the
The nature of the Supreme Court's jurisdiction to ' .
determine the suffidency of the factual basis for the President did not act arbitrarily. Thus, the standard laid ·...,.,....:-
!
declaration of martial law and the suspension of the down is not correctness, but arbitrariness.
privilege of the writ of habeas corpus by the President is
sui generis and granted by Sec. 18, Art. VII of the PP 1017 is constitutional insofar as it constitutes a call by
Constitution. The said provision provides that in case of PGMA on the AFP to suppress :awless violence, which
invasion or rebellion, when public safety requires it, the pertains to a spectrum of conduct that is manifestly subject
i i,
President may, for a period not exceeding 60 days to state regulation, and not free speech. '\4.•.;.>
suspend the privilege of the writ of habeas corpus or place
the Philippines or any part thereof under martial law. It PP 1017 is unconstitutional insofar as it grants PGMA the
does not stem from Sec. 1 or 5 of Art. VIII. (Lagman v. authority to promulgate "decrees." Legislative power is
Medislclea, G.R. No. 231658, July 4, 2017) within the province of the Legislature. She can only order
the military, under PP 1017, to enforce laws pertinent to its
duty to suppress lawless violence (David v. Gloria
Macspagal-Arroyo,G.R. No. 171396, 2006).
Page 48 of 320
ATENEO CENTRAL
BAR OPERATIONS 2019 POLITICAL LAW
limitations:
The President does not have the power to take over Cannot be granted:
privately owned public utilities or businesses affected with Before conviction, in cases of impeachment
public interest, without prior legislation. • The President can pardon criminal offenses after
an impeachment proceeding such as what
Gen. Order No. 5 is constitutional since it provides a happened in 2007 when President Arroyo
standard by which the AFP and the PNP should implement pardoned former President Estrada after having
PP 1017, that is, suppressing lawless violence. However, been convicted by the Sandiganbayan of plunder.
considering that "acts of terrorism" have not yet been • The exercise bf the pardoning power is
defined and made punishable by the Legislature, such discretionary in the President and may not be
portion of G.O. No. 5 is declared unconstitutional (David interfered with by Congress or the Court, except
v. Macapagal-Arroyo, G.R. No. 171396, 2006). only when it exceeds the limits provided for by the
Constltutlon (Risos-Vidal v. COMELEC, G.R. No.
The declaration of a state of emergency is merely a 206666, 2015).
description of a situation that authorizes (the President) to For violations of election laws, 'rules, and regulations
call out the Armed Forces to help the police maintain law without the favorable recommendation of the COMELEC
and order. It gives no new power to her, or to the military, In cases of clvll or legislative contempt
or to the police. Certainly, it does not authorize warranUess Granted only after conviction by final Judgment. (People. v.
arrests or control of media (David v. Ermita, G.R. No. Sa/le, 250 SCRA 581).
171409, 2006). 2. As to effect:
Does not absolve civil liabilities for an offense
Presidential proclamation of a state of emergency is NOT Does not restore public offices already forfeited, although
sufficient to allow the President to tal<e over any public eligibility for the same may be restored (Monsanto v.
l,, ,!I utility. Since it is an aspect of emergency powers in Factoran, G.R. No. 78239, 1989).
accordance with § 23 (2). Art. VI of the Constitution, there
must be a law delegating sucn power to the President 4. Forms of Executive Clemency
(David v, Macagapal Arroyo, G.R. No. 171396, 2006). a. PARDON -An act of grace, proceeding from the power
entrusted of the laws, which exempts the individual on
Ways to Lift the proclamation or suspension whom it is bestowed, from the punishment the law
1. Lifting by the President himself; inflicts for a crime he has committed ( United States v.
2. Revocation by Congress; Wilson, 503 U.S. 329, 1992). It is either condltlonal
3. Nullification by the Supreme Court; and or plenary.
4. By operation of law after 60 days (CONST. Art. VII, b. AMNESTY -An act of grace concurred in by Congress,
Sec.18) usually extended to groups of persons who commit
,,.
,,.. "
... pol!tical offenses, which puts into oblivion the offense
I, F The factual necessity of calling out the armed forces is itself. The President alone cannot grant amnesty for it
something that is for the President to decide (IBP v needs the concurrence by a majority of all the members
Zamora, GR No. 141284, August 15, 2000). , of Congress. When a person applies for amnesty, he
must admit his guilt of the offense that is subject to
PARDONING POWERS (SEC. 19) such amnesty. If his application is denied, he can be
convicted based on this admission of guilt.
Nature and Limitation c. REPRIEVE - postpones the execution of an offense to
The matter of executive clemency is non-delegable power a day certain (People v. Vera, G.R. No. L-45685,
and must be exercised by the President personally (Villena 1937).
v, Secretary of the Interior, G.R. No. L-46570, 1939). d. REMISSION OF FINES AND FORFEITURES -
...- _; r: prevents the collection of fines or the confiscation of
The power exists as an instrument for c:orrecting the forfeited property but it cannot have the effect of
(3 infirmities in administration of justice and for mitigating retuming the property which has been vested in 3rd
whenever a strict application of the provisions of the law . parties or money already in the public treasury (Bernas,
will result in undue harshness. (Bernas, 1987 Philippine 1987 Phillppine Constitution: A Commentary, 933,
Ccnstitution: A Commentary, 924, 2009). 2009).
:: . .. ~,·
) :- Page 49 of 320
ATENEO CENTRAL
BAR OPERATIONS 20·,9 POLITICAL LAW
e. COMMUTATION - a rerrussion of a part of the prior concurrence of the Monetary Board; and subject
punishment; it is a substitution of a lesser penalty for to such limita!ions as may be provided by law
the one originally imposed (People v. Vera, G.R. No. L- • The Monetary Board shall, within 30 days from the end
45685, 1937). of every quarter of the calendar year, submit to
Congress a complete report on loans to be contracted
Amnesty v. Pardon or guaranteed by the government or GOCCs that would
have the effect of increasinq foreign debt.
AMNESlY. PARDON
I
ATENEO CENTRAL
BAR OPERATIONS 2019 POLITICAL LAW
EXECUTIVE AGREEMENTS
Executive agreements are concluded: Rules In case Of Conflict Between Treaty And
to adjust the details of a treaty, e.g., EDCA as to VFA; Municipal Law, Depending On Venue
pursuant to or upon confirmation by an act of the Philippine court: Provided both are self-executing, the
Legislature; or later enactment will prevail, be it treaty or law, as it is the
in the exercise of the President's independent powers latest expression of the will of the State.
under the Constitution.
International tribunal: Treaty will always prevail. A State
The President may enter into an executive agreement on cannot plead its municipal law to justify noncompliance
foreign military bases, troops or facllitles only if the with an international obligation
executive agreement
is not the instrument that allows the presence of foreign_ Exception: Vienna Convention on Law of Treaties Art. 46
military bases, troops or facilities; or - Constitutional violation was: .·
merely aims to implement an existing law or treaty. : > Manifest - Objectively evldent to any State
(Saguisag v. Exec. sec., G.R. No. 212426, 2016) conducting itself in the matter in accordance with
normal practice and in good faith.
Altllough municipal law makes a distinction between > Concerned a rule of Its inten 1al law of fundamental
international agreements and executive aqreements, with importance.
the former requiring Senate approval and the latter not
needing the same, under international law, there is no An "exchange of notes" is a record of a routine agreement
such distinction. that has many similarities with a private law contract. The
agreement consists of the exchange of two documents,
The President cannot, by executive agreement, each of the parties being in possession of the one signed
undertake an obligation that indirectly circumvents a legal by the representative of the o1her. Under the usual
prohibition. procedure, the accepting State repeats the text of the
offering State to record its assent. An exchange of notes is
The President alone without the concurrence of the considered a form of an executive agreement, which
Senate abrogated a treaty. Assume that the other country becomes binding through executive action without the
party to the treaty is agreeable to the abrogation provided need of a vote by the Senate or Congress (Abaya vs.
it complies with the Philippine Constitution. If a case Edbane, G.R. No. 167919, 2007).
involving the validity of the treaty abrogation is brought to
the SC, it should dismiss the case. The Jurisdiction of the The Exchange of Notes between Secretary Romulo and
SC (other lower courts) over a treaty is only with respect the US Ambassador embodying a "No Surrender
to questions of its constilutionality of validity. It does not Agreement'' regarding citizens arrested under the Rome
pertain to the termination/abrogation of a treaty {Gonzales Treaty ie valid. An exchange of Notes is equivalent to an
v Hecnenove. G.R. Na. L-21897, 1963). executive agreement and it is a valid form of international
agreement. The categorization of agreements in Eastern
Treaty v. E>recutive Agraement10 Sea Trading, is not cast in stone. Neither a hard and fast
, '...
1,
'< :J
rule on whether Senate concurrence is needed for
TREATY EXECUTIVE AGREEMENT executive agreements. (Bayan Muna v. Secretary Romulo,
Involves political lssues.'
G.R No. 159618, 2011).
Involve details carrying out
national policy national policy
'
'
\ .:/
,.
10
Note: See Part XVI {F) (P11blic International Law - Treaties)
for further discussion..
1. Borrowing Power: The President may contract or The Supreme Court en bane shall act as the sole judge
guarantee foreign loans on behalf of the Republic with over all contests relating to the election, returns, and
the concurrence of the Monetary Board, subject to qualifications of the President or Vice-President and may
such limitations as rr.ay be provided by law. promulgate its rules for the purpose.
2. Deportation Power ·
I
3. Power to Receive Ambassadors and other public Congress may delegate countlnq to a committee provided
., ministers duly accredited to the Philippines it approves it as a body.
4. Informing Power: The President shall address Considered as a non-legislative function of Congress.
Congress at the opening of its regular session. He may
also appear before it at any time. · Proclamation of President-Elect & VP-Elect is the function
5. Call Congress to a special session of Congress not the COMELEC's.
6. Emergency Powers: Congress may authorize the
.. ,.; President to exercise powers necessary and proper to Limitations:
carry out a declared national policy. 1. Salaries and emoluments of the President and Vice-
President shall be determined by law
• Conditions for the Exercise of the President of
2. Shall not be decreased during the tenure of the
Emergency Powers:
President and the Vice-President
10. There must be a war or national emergency;
3. Increases take effect only after the expiration of the
11. There must be a law authorizing the President
term of the incumbent during which the increase was
to exercise emergency powers;
approved.
12. Exercise must be for a limited period
4. No other emolument from the government or any other
13. Exercise must be necessary and proper to
source during their tenure may be received.
carry out a declared national policy; and
14. Must be subject to Restrictions that Congress
may provide
7. Power to Classify an::I Reclassify lands
·.,r
ATENEO CENTRAL
BAR OPERATIONS 2019 POLITICAL LAW
Succession of President-elect and Vice-President Vacancy in the Office of the \'ice-President (Sec.9)
elect at the Start of the Term (Sec. 7) Procedure T':> Fill Up Vacancy
President will nominate new VP from among the members
VACANCY sUCCESSOR of either House of Conqress.
President-elect fails to VP-elect will be Acting . .
qualify or lo be chosen President until a President is Nominee shall assume office upon confirmation by majority
qualified/chosen vote of ALL members of both Houses, voting separately.
(In effect, nominee forfeits his seat in Congress.)
President-elect dies or VP beco mes President
Election of President and Vice-President after
permanently disabled
vacancy (Sec.10)
Both President and VP- Senate President, or in case
elect are not chosen, or of his ina bility, Procedure
do not qualify, or both Speaker of the House shall Congress shall convene 3 days after the vacancy in thl:l
die, or both become act as Presiclent until a offices of both the President and the \/P, without need of a
permanently disabled President or a VP shall have call. The convening of Conqress cannot be suspended.
been cho sen and qualified.
Death, permanent
Within 7 days after convening, Congress shall enact a law
disability, or inability of Congress shall determine,
Senate President and bylaw, who will be the calling for a special election to elect a President and a VP.
Speaker of the House Acting President until a The special election cannot be postponed.
as Acting President President or VP shall have
qual\fied. The requirement of three readings on separate days under
Sec. 26(2), Art VI shall not apply to a bill calling for a
Succession of President and Vice-President During special election. The law shall be deemed enacted upon
Mid-Term (Sec. 8) its approval on third reading.
VACANCY SUCCESSOR The special election shall be held within 45-60 days from
President dies/ VPbecomes President for the time of the enactment of the law.
permanently disabled/ the une xpired term
impeached or resigns Limitation: No special election shall be called if the
vacancy occurs within 18 months before the date of the
Both President and VP Senate President, or in next presidential election.
die/ permanently disabled/ case of his inability,
impeached, or resign Speake r of the House
Temporary Disability of the President to discharge
shall acl as President until
Death, permanent the President or VP shall his duties [Sec. 11 J may be raised In either of two
disability, or inability of have been elected and ways:
Senate President and qualifie d. By the President himself, when he sends a written
Speaker of the House as declaration to the Senate President and the Speaker of the
Acting President Congress shall determine, House. In this case, the Vice-President will be Acting •· t:
bylaw, who will be the President until the President transmits a written declaration
Acting President until a to the contrary.
Preside nt or VP shall have
been el ected and qualified,
When a majority of all Cabinet members transmit to the
subject to the same
Senate President and the Speaker of the House their
restrictions of powers and
disquali fications as the written declaration. The VP will immediateiy assume the
Acting President powers and duties of the office as Acting President.
·:._;..·
' If within 5 days after the President re-assumes his position, ,,... )
~-
-
A TENEO CENTRAL ·
BAR OPERATIONS 2019 POLITICAL LAW
... .:,
':..... ...)
- .,
Page 55 of 320
ATENEO CEN1RAL
BAR OPERATIONS 2019 POLITICAL LAW
1952).
•.. ;.,
Page 56 of 320
ATENEO CENTRAL
BAR OPERATIONS 2019 POLITICAL LAW
.... ,
ATENEO CENTRAL
BAR OPERATIONS 2019 POLITICAL LAW
Page 58 of 320
ATENEO CENTRAL
BAR OPERATIONS 2019 POLITICAL LAW
Requirements for Justiclability d. the case Is capable of repetition yet evading review.
a. That there be an actual controversy between or among (Narra Nickel Mining and Development Corp. v.
the parties to the dispute; Redmont Consolidation Mines Corp., G.R. No. 195580,
b. That the interests of the parties be adverse; 20'15)
c. That the matter in controversy be capable of being
adjudicated by judicial power; and (c) Political questions doctrine
d. That the determinaticn of the controversy will result in
practical relief to the complainant. Political Question - A question, the resolution of which
has been vested by the C0nstitution exclusively
(a) Operative fact 1. In the people, in the exercise of their sovereign
Effect of a Declaration of Unconstitutionality - Prior to capacity, or
the declaration that a particular law is unconstitutional, it is 2. In which full discretionary authority has been delegated
considered an "operative fact". Vested rights acquired to a co-equal branch of the Government (Tanada v.
under such law before it was declared unconstitutional are Cuenco, G.R. No. L-10520, 1957).
not prejudiced by the subsequent declaration that the law
is unconstitutional. While courts can determine questions of legality with
respect to governmental action, they cannot review
A mere administrative practice, not formalized into a rule government policies and the wisdom behind such policies.
or ruling, will not suffice because such a mere These questions are vested by the Constitution in the
administrative practice may not be uniformly and Executive and Legislative Departments.
consistently applied. An administrative practice, if not
formalized as a rule or ruling, will not be known to the "EDSA I involves the exercise of the people power of
general public and can be availed of only by those within revolution which overthrew the whole government. EDSA
,:;
the formal contacts witn the government agency. (CIR v. II is an exercise,of people power of freedom of speech and
San Roque Power Corporation, G.R. No. 187485, 2013) freedom of assembly to petition the government for redress
of grievances which only affected the office of the
(b) Moot questions President. EDSA I is extra constitutional and the legitimacy
When an action is considered Moot of the new government that resulted from it cannot be the
An action is considered MOOT when it no longer presents subject of judicial review, but EDSA II is extra
a justiciable controversy because the issues involved have constitutional and the resignation of the sitting President
become academic or dead or when the matter has already that it caused and the succession of the Vice President as
been resolved. There is nothing for the court to resolve as President are subject to judicial review. EDSA I presented
the determination thereof has been overtaker. by a political question; EDSA II involves legal questions"
subsequent events (Atty. Evillo C. Pormento v. Estrada (Estrada v. Desierto, G.R. No. 146710-15, 2001).
, ... and COMELEC, G.R. No. 191988, 2010).
The Judiciary is NOT precluded from reviewing "political
A moot case is one that ceases to present a justiciable questions". Under the second clause of Sec. 1, Art. VIII
controversy by virtue of supervening events, so that a , (the power to determine whether or not there has been a
declaration thereon would be of no practical use or value. grave abuse of discretion) the Courts may now determine
Generally, courts decline jurisdiction over such case or whether there has been grave abuse of discretion
dismiss it. As this Court has time and again declared, the amounting to lack or excess of jurisdiction on the part of
"moot and academic" principle is not a magical formula any branch or instrumentality of government.
that automatically dissuades courts in resolving a case.
The determination of what constitutes "betrayal of public
When Courts still decide even if the case is Moot trust" or "other high crimes" is a political question. A
The Court may still take cognizance of an otherwise moot determination of what constitutes an impeachable offense
and academic case, if it finds that: is a purely political question, which the Constitution has left
a. there is a grave violation of the Constitution; to the sound discretion of the legislature (Ma. Merveditas
b. the situation Is of exceptional character and paramount . N. Gutierrez v. The House of Representatives Committee
public interest is involved; on Justice, et af., G.R. No. 193459, 2011).
c. the constitutional issue raised requires formulation of
controlling principles to guide the bench, the bar, and · .
the public; and
Page 59 of 320
ATENEO CENTRAL
BAR OPERATIONS 2019 POLITICAL LAW
The Ombudsman, despite being a constitutionally created 3. SC may not be deprived of minimum and appellate
body with constitutionally mandated independence comes jurisdiction; appellate Jurisdiction may not be increased
within the scope of the power of Judicial review which without its advice or concurrence; Congress cannot
serves as a safety net 1:1gainst capricious and arbitrary acts deprive the Supreme Court of its jurisdiction over cases
of any branch or agency of the Government (Presidential provided for in the Constitution. Congress can only do
Ad Hoc Fact-Finding Committee on Behest Loans v. the following:
Desierto, G.R. No. 135715, 2011).
• Define enforceabla and demandable rights;
prescribing remedies for violations of such rights
Examples of political questions In jurisprudence.
Interpretation of the meaning of "disorderty behavior" and • Determine the court with jurisdiction to hear and
the legislature's power to suspend a member (there is no decide controversies or disputes arising from
procedure for the imposition of the penalty of suspension legal rights
nor did the 1935 Constitution define what "dlsorderty 4. SC has administrative supervision over all inferior
behavior is). The matter is left to the discretion of the courts and personnel;
legislature (Osmena, Jr. v. Pendatun, G.R. 17144, 1960). 5. SC has exclusive power to discipline judges/ justices of
Whether the court could intervene in a case where the': inferior courts;
House of Representatives was said to have disregarded its 6. Members of the judiciary enjoy security of tenure;
own rule. The court was hold to have been without 7. Members of judiciary may not be designated to any
authority to interv&ne (Arroyo v. De Venecia, G.R. No. agency performing quasi-judicial or administrative
127255, 1997). functions;
Recognition of diplomatic immunity (International Catholic
• The Court rejected 'petltloner's claim that the
Migration Commission v. Hon. Calleja, G.R. No. 85750,
1990). Presidential Electoral Tribunal (PET) exercises
quasi-judicial functions contrary to Section 12, ;
\, ...
Article VIII of the Constitution. When the Supreme
Examples of cases ln jurisprudence where the Court .
Court, as the PET, resolves a presidential or vice-
held that there was nu political question involved. ·
presidential election contest, it performs what is
1. Apportionment of representative districts {because
essentially a judicial power (Atty. Macalintal v.
there are constitutional rules governing apportionment)
Presidential Electoral Tribunal, G.R. No. 191618,
(Bagabuyo v. COMELEC, G.R. No. 176970, 2008).
2010).
2. Suspension of the privilege of the writ of habeas corpus
because the Constitution sets limits to executive
8. Salaries of judges may not be reduced.
discretion on the matter (Montenegro v. Castaneda, • Salaries of SC Justices and judges of lower courts
G.R. No. L4221, 1952). . shall be fixed by taw. It cannot be decreased
3. Manner of forming the Commission on Appointments during their continuance in office, but can be
(Daza v. Singson, G.R. No. 86344, 1989; Coseteng v.
Mitra, G.R. No. 86649, 1990; Guingona v. Gonzales,
increased. Members of the Judiciary are NOT
'exempt from payment of income tax (Nitafan v. . .
G.R. No. 106971, 1992). CIR, G.R. No. 78780, 1987).
9. SC alone may initiate Rules of Court; ,•. ::..
SAFEGUARDS OF SECURING JUDICIAL 10. SC alone may order temporary detail of judges;
INDEPENDENCE 11. SC can appoint all officials and employees of the
Judiciary.
1. Being a Constitutional body, it may not be abolished by
law; Salaries of Judges and General Income Tax
In Nitafan v CIR, the Court held that the salaries of Justices
• Creation and abolition of courts - The power to
and Judges are properly subject to a general income tax
create courts IMPLIES•the power to abolish and
law applicable to all income earners and that the payment
even re-orqanlze courts. But this power cannot be
of such income tax by Justices and Judges does not fall
exercised in a manner that would undermine the
within the constitutional protection against decrease of
securlty of tenure of the judiciary. If the abolition
their salaries during their continuance in office.
or re-organization is done in good faith and not
for political or personal reasons, it is valid.
2. Members are only removable by impeachment;
JUDICIAL RESTRAINT in the practice of law in the Philippines or has held public
office in the Philippines requiring admission to the practice
Judicial Restraint of law as a requisite.
This doctrine is well intertwined with the doctrine of
separation of powers. The courts should defer to the THE JUDICIAL ANO BAR COUNCIL
decisions made by the legislature and executive branches
and should not thwart the implementation of these acts Composition
unless they are clearly unconstitutional. The Supreme 1. Chief Justice, as ex-officio chairman
Court exercises judicial restraint where the issue before it 2. Secretary of Justice, as ex-officio member
has already been mooted by subsequent events. 3. Representative of Congress, as ex-officio member
4. Representative of the Integrated Bar
Appointments to the Judiciary 5. A professor of law
6. A retired member of the SC
Qualifications
7. Private sector representative
Every prospective appointee to the judiciary must apprise
the appointing authority of every matter bearing on his
The last four are the regular members of the JBC. The
fitness for judicial office including such circumstances as
President, with CA approval, appoints regular members
may reflect on his integrity and probity (Office of the Court
who serve for 4 years, in staggered terms.
Administratorv. Estacio,1, Jr., A.M. No. RTJ-87-104, 1990;
Gutierrez v. Be/an, A.M. No. MTJ-95-1059, 1998).
The JBC is composed of 7 members coming from different
I
sectors. Thus, while we do not lose sight of the bicameral
Until a correction of existing records on one's birth and
nature of our legislative department, it is beyond dispute
citizenship, one cannot accept an appointment to the
that the Constitution is explicit that we have only "a
!,:,, b'
judiciary, as that would be a violation of the Constitution.
representative". Thus, two (2) representatives from
For this reason, he can be prevented by lnjunction from
Congress would increase the number of JBC members to
doing so (Kilosbayan v. Ermita, G.R. No. 177721, 2007}.
eight (8), a number beyond what the Constitution has
Qualifications for J11dges and Justices: contemplated. The lone representative of Congress is
entitled to one full vote. This eifectively disallows the
LOWER scheme of splitting the said vote into half between two
LOWER NON-
SUPREME COLLEGIATE representatives of Congress.
COLLEGIATE
COURT COURTS (CA, CTA,
COURTS
Sandiganbayan) Thus, any inclusion of another member, whether with one
whole vote or 1/2 of it, goes against that mandate. Section
Natural born citizen of the Citizen of the
8(1 ), Article VIII of the Constitution, providing Congress
Philippines Philippines
with an equal voice with other members of the JBC in
(may be a
recommending appointees to the Judiciary is expllcit
naturalized citizen)
(Chavez v. JBC, G.R. No. 202242, 2013).
At least 40 Possesses other qualifications
years old prescribed by Congress Functions of The ,JBC
Primary Function: Recommend appointees to the
At least 15 Member of the Philippine Bar Judiciary.
years of Secondary Function: It may also exercise such other
experience as functions as the SC may assign to it.
a judge or in
the practice of Rules on Appointments/Clustering of Nominees
law in the 1. President shall appoint Members of the Supreme Court
Philippines and judges of lower courts from a list of al least 3
nominees for each vacancy, as prepared by the JBC.
A person of proven competence, integrity, probity and
2. No CA confirmation is needed for appointments to the
independence Judiciary.
'
3. Vacancies in SC should be filled within 90 days from
Note: For the RTC/MTC the age requirements is at least t~e occurrence of the vacancy.
35/30 years old' has been engaged for at least 10/5 years
.. ,i PagP. 61 of 320
·.....
regularly released. Literally, first among equals; the maxim indicates that a \ .
person is the most sen!or of a group of people sharing the
Any exemption from the paymert of legal fees granted by same rank or office. The phrase has been used to describe
Congress to government-owned or controlled corporations the status, condition or role of the Chief Justice in many
and local government units will r.ecessarily reduce the supreme courts around the world.
Judiciary Development Fund (JDF) and the Special
Allowance for the Judiciary Fund (SAJF). Undoubtedly, Decisions By The Supreme Court . ,
t .;,
such situation is constitutionally infirm for it impairs the Reached in consultation before being assigned to a
Court's gl'aranteed fiscal autonomy and erodes its member for the writing of the court's opinion. I '·
t\,,~·'
Page 62 of 320
'----------··. ·-··· -.
A TENEO CENTRAL
BAR OPERATIONS 2019 POLITICAL LAW
All lower colleglate courts shall observe the same Cases Required To Be Heard En Banc
procedure (e.g., CA, CTA, and Sandiganbayan). All cases involving constitutionality of a: (UT)
- !:.aw
Decisions By The Lower Courts - International or executive agreement
• Decisions must state clearly and distinctly the facts - Ireaty
and the law on which they are based. (CONST. Art. All cases involving the constitutionality, application or
VIII, Sec. 14) operation of: (POPORI)
• Memorandum decisions, where the appellate court - f.residential decrees
adopts the findings of fact and law of the lower court, - Qrders
are allowed as long as the decision adopted by - froclamations
reference is attached to the Memorandum for easy - Qrdinances
reference. (Oil and Natural Gas Commission v. CA, - Other _Regulations
GR No. 114323, July 23, 1998) - [nstructlons
Timeframe For Deciding All cases required to be heard en bane under the Rules of
Court
SUPREME COLLEGIATE LOWER Appeals from Sandlganbayan and from the
COURT COURTS COURTS Constitutional Commissions
Cases heard by a division where required r:najority of
24 months from 12 months from 3 months from
submission submission submission
3 was not obtained
Cases where SC modifies or reverses a doctrine or
principle of law laid down by the SC en bane or by a
Periods above commence from the date of submission for division
decision or resolution. Administrative cases to discipline or dismiss Judges
of lower courts
A case or matter shall be deemed submitted for decision Election contests for President and Vice-President.
or resolution upon the filing of the last pleading, briaf, or
memorandum required by the Rules of Court or by the Other cases outside the ehumeration are heard in Division
Court itself. and decided or resolved with the concurrence of a majority
; •·.
of the members who actually took part in the deliberations
·;. T Upon expiration of the period without decision or on the issues and voted thereon, but in no case without the
resolution, a r.ertification stating why no decision or concurrence of at least 3 such members.
•'
,·-,
:.
.;'
resolution has been rendered shall be issued and signed
by the Chief Justice or presiding judge.
Decisions or resolutions of a division of the court, when
concurred in by a majority of Its members who actually took
A copy of the certillcation shall be attached to the record of part in the deliberations on the Issues in a case and voted
the case or matter, and served upon the parties.
thereon is a decision or resolution of the Supreme Court
itself. The Supreme Court sitting en bane is not an
The expiration of the period notwithstanding, the court shall
-, ,;. appellate court vis-a-vis its Divisions, and it exercises no
decide or resolve the case or matter without further delay.
appellate jurisdiction over the latter. Each division of the
Court is considered not a body inferior to the Court en
The Sandiganbayan falls under the 3-month rule because bane, and sits veritably as the Gourt en bane itself. The
it is a trial-court, not a collegiate court (Re: Problemsof
only constraint is that any doctrine or prinr.iple of law laid
Delays in Cases Before the Sandiganbayan,A.M. No. 00-
down by the Court, either rendered en bane or in division,
8-05-SC, 2002).
may be overturned or reversed only by the Court sitting en
bane. (FirestoneCeramics v. CA, G.R. No. 127245, 2000)
1. EN BANC AND DIVISION CASES
:
··.~:i Page 63 of 320
·.... ,
ATENEO CENTRAL
BAR OPERATIONS 2019 POLITICAL LAW
Page 64 of 320
ATENEO CENTRAL
BAR OPERATIONS 2019 POLITICAL LAW
Page 66 of 320
ATENEO CENTRAL
BAR OPERATIONS 2019 POLITICAL LAW
.. .•
(4) Eligibility for Appointment as Chairman of
Where rotational scheme of appointments apply: Commissioner who resigns: A commissioner who
1. Civil Service Commission (CSC) resigns after serving in the Commission for less than
2. Commission on Elections (COMELEC) seven years is eligible for an appointment as Chairman
3. Commission on Audit (GOA) for the unexpired portion of the term of the departing
4. Judicial and Bar Council (JBC) chairman. Such appointment is not covered by the ban
en reappointment, provided that the aggregate period
of the length of service will not exceed seven (7) years
.( -. and provided further that the vacancy in the position of
-. ...;
Chairman resulted from death, resignation, disability or
' ;, removal by impeachment. This Is not a reappointment,
.."',,,
but effectively a new appointment
Page 67 of 320
'·····
.~
... :.,,:
ATENEO CENTRAL.
BAR OPERATIONS 2019 POLITICAL LAW
\..)
. .
Page 68 of 320
. .,;
ATENEO CENTRAL
BAR OPERATIONS 2019 POLITICAL LAW
Appointment to any vacancy shall be only for the unexpired The CSC cannot disallow an appointment to a position
!of•• term of the predecessor. In no case shall any member be authorized by law but not included in the Index of
appointed or designated in a temporary or acting capacity. Occupational Service. Although the CSC rules limit
(CONST. M.IX-8, Sec.1, Par(2)) appointments to positions within the Index of Occupational
Service, nevertheless, it is limited to the implementation of
the laws it is tasked to eniorce. RA 8494 exempted the
Trade and Investment Corporation from conforming to the
position classification; thus, the appointment is valid ( Trade
and Investment v. CSC, G.R.No.182249, 2013) .
.. _ _..{
Page 69 of 320
..__ ., .
ATENEO CENTRAL
POLITICAL LAW
BAR OPERATIONS 2019
administrator of government c!ffices and agencies. Its Whether the employee took Action to maintain his privacy
functions and authority are limited to approving or in the item
reviewing appointments to determine their compliance with Whether the item was in the immediate fontrol of the
requlrernents of the Civil Service Law. On its own, the employee; (Pollo v. Constantino-David, G.R. No. 181881, ~~ ...
Commission does not have ihe power to terminate 2011)
employment or drop members from the rolls (UP and
Torres v, CSC. G.R. No. 132860, 2001).
Page 70 of 320
ATENEO CENTRAL
BAR OPERATIONS 2019 POLITICAL LAW
,,... . ,'
1;. ::
Pagf! 71 of 320
...,•
"---i
A TENEO CENTRAL
BAR OPERATIONS 2019 POLITICAL LAW
• There is no need for a special legislation for the d. Issue writs of certiorari, prchlbltlon and
authorization of the conduct of recall elections mandamus in the exercise of its appellate
because It is deemed included in the constitutional .. jurisdiction.
function of COMELEC, hence, contemplated in its
budget in the GAA (Goh v. Bayron, G.R. No. Decide, except thane involving the right to vote, all
212584, 2014). questions affecting elections, including determination of
the number and location of polling places, appointment of
Exercise election officials and Inspectors, and registration of voters.
Exclusive original jurisdiction over all contests relating to These petitions are cognizable by the Regular Courts
the elections, returns, and qualifications of all elective {MTC).
regional, provincial and city officials
Election contests in the Sangguniang J<abataan (SK) are Deputize, with the concurrence bf the President, law
not under COMELEC jurisdiction but under the jurisdiction · enforcement agencies and instrumentalities of the
of the DILG. Government, including the Armed Forces of the
Appellate jurisdiction over all contests involving: Philippines, for the exclusive purpose of ensuring free,
Elective municipal officials decided by trial courts of orderly, honest, peaceful, and credible elections.
general Ju.-isdiction • This power is NOT limited to the election period.
Elective barangay offlclals decided by trial courts of • Applies to both criminal and administrative
limited jurisdiction cases.
• A petition for certiorari questioning an interlocutory
order of a trial court in an electoral protest was within Register political parties, organizations, or coalitions,
the appellate jurisdiction of the COMELEC. The Court accredit citizens' arms of the Commission on Elections.
recognizes the COMELEC's appellate jurisdiction over • Political parties, etc. must present their platform or i
petitions for certiorari against all acts or omissions of
,....
program of government.
courts in election cases (Bu/i/is v. Nuez, G.R. No. • There should be sufficient publlcation.
195953, 2011). • Groups that cannot be registered:
• Petition for certiorari questioning the decision of Religious denominations/ sects
COMELEC division is premature as there is a plain and Those that seek to achieve their goals through violence or·
speey remedy before COMELEC Er: Banc (Vil/arosa v. unlawful means
Festin, G.R. No. 212953, 2014). Those that refuse to uphold and adhere to the Constitution.
• Decisions, final orders, or rulings of the Those supported by any foreign government e.g. receipt of
COMELEC contests inrolving elective municipal
and barangay offices shall be final, executory,
financial contributions related to elections
.\...,
and not appealable. Fiie, upon a verified complaint, or on its own initiative,
Exception: petitions in court for inclusion or exclusion of voters; ( ~-
May be appealed to tho SC EN BANC on questions of law investigate and, where appropriate, prosecute cases of
When the decision is brought on a special civil action for violations of election laws, including acts or omissions .{ -:.
't, .. ;
certiorari, prohibition, or mandamus under Rule 64 for constituting elections frauds, offonses and malpractices.
grave abuse of discretion under Article IX-A Section 7. COME:LEC has exclusive jurisdiction 10 inve:stigate and
Contempt powers prosecute cases for violations of election laws.
COMELEC can deputize prosecutors for this purpose. The >
,_ .,;
•
COMELEC can exercise this power only in relation to its actions of the prosecutors are the actions of the
COMELEC. .
adjudicatory or quasi-judicial functions. It CANNOT
exercise this in connection with its purely executive or COMELEC can conduct preliminary investigation on
ministerial functions. election cases falling within its jurisdiction. :I :
'"·'
If it is a pre-proclamation controversy, the COMELEC Recommend to the Congress effective measures to ', :-
exercises quasi-judlclal or administrative powers. minimize election spending, including limitation of places .
where propaganda materials shall be posted, and to
<:»
Its Jurisdiction over 'contests' (after proclamation) is in prevent and penalize all forms of election frauds, offenses,
exercise of its judicial funcnons. malpractices, and nuisance candidacies.
Page 72 of 320
ATENEO CENTRAL
BAR OPERATIONS 2019 PO!..ITICAL LAW
Recommend to the President the removal of any officer or • The provisions in Article IX, C, Section 2, enumerating
employee it has deputized, or the imposition of any other the powers and functions of COMELEC does not have
disciplinary action, for violation or disregard of, or
' the same exactitude of the provisions of Art. VI, Sec.
disobedience to its directive, order, or decision. 17, which provides for the HRET and SET, or that of
Art. VII, Sec. 4, which provides that the SC en bane
Submit to the President and the Congress a . shall be the sole judge of all contest regarding the
comprehensive report on the conduct of each election, . Presidency and Vice-Presidency. These tribunals have
plebiscite, initiative, referendum, or recall. (CONST. Art. jurisdiction over the question of qualifications of the
IX-C, Sec. 2) President, VP, Senators, and the HoR.
o Not one of the enumerated powers of the
The vote requirement for a valid COMELEC en Banc COMELEC as stated in Article IX C, Sec. 2 of the
resolution is a majority of the votes of all members, er 4 Constitution grants the commission the power to
votes. If the six members are evenly divided, the determine the qualifications of a candidate.
Commission on Elections should rehear the case (Sevilla • In Fermin v COMELEC, the SC ruled that mere rules
v. COMELEC, G.R. 203833, 2013}. could not be sufficient to provide the COMELEC with
power to decide on the ineligibility of candidates.
Powers not given to COMELEC • Insofar as the qualification of a candidate is concerned,
Decide questions involving the right to vote (placed under Rule 25 and Rule 23 of the COMELEC rules do not
jurisdiction of courts); allow authorization and do not constitute vestment of
Transfer municipalities from one congressional district to jurisdiction for the COMELEC to determine the
another for the purpose of preserving proportionality. qualification of a candidate.
• The facts of qualification must first be established in a
Cases decided by COMELEC subject to judicial prior proceeding before an authority vested with
review: jurisdiction. Prior determination of qualification may be
Decisicns or determinations by COMELEC in the exercise by statute, by an executive order or by a judgment of a
of its administrative (not quasi-judicial) power may be competent court or tribunal.
questioned in an ordinary civil action before the trial court. • Lacking this prior determination, the certificate of
(FilipinasEngineering & Machine Shop v. Ferrer, G.R. No. candidacy cannot be cancelled or denied due course
L-31455, 1985). on ground of false representations regarding a
• · The Court has no power to review on certiorari an candidate's qualifications except if there exists self-
interlocutory order or. even a final resolution issued by evident facts of unquestioned or unquestionable
a DIVISION of the COMELEC. The Court can only veracity and judicial C<;'nfessions.
review a final decision or resolution of the COMELEC • In this light the COMELEC cannot cancel Poe's
en bane (Cagas vs. COMELEC, G.R. No. 194139, certificate of candidacy lacklng prior determination of
2012). her qualifications by a competent body. (Poe-
• COMELEC has jurisdiction to determine the presence Uamanzares 11. Come/ec et al, G.R. Nos. 221697 &
of "probable cause" in election cases. The finding of 221698-700, March 8, 2016)
probable cause and the prosecution of election
offenses rests in the COMELEC's sound discretion Regulation of Public Utilities, Media and Franchises
(Baytan v. COMELEC, G.R. No. 153945, 2003}. The COMELEC may, during the election period, supervise
• The Chief State Prosecutor, who may have been . or regulate the utilization of all franchises or permits for the
designated by the COMELEC to prosecute a criminal operation of transportation and other public utilities, media,
action, merely derives his authority from the all grants, privileges and concessions, granted by the
COMELEC. It is beyond his power to oppose the Government. (CONST. Art.lX-C, Sec.4)
appeal made by COMELEC (Come/ec v. Silva, G.R.
No. 129417, 1998). The aim is to ensure equal opportunity, time, and space,
and the right to reply, induding reasonable equal rates for
The COMELEC cannot itself, in the same cancellation (of public information campaigns and forums among
certificate of candidacy) case, decide the qualification or candidates. (CONST.Art. lX-C, Sec.4)
lack thereof of the candidate if such issues are yet
undecided or undetermined by the proper authority.
. '
-:-...:ff Page 73 of 320
',;.•
-=- ,,
... ·~·"
ATENEO CENTRAL
BAR OPERATIONS 2019 POLITICAL LAW
Can print media be compelled to allocate free space? COA is endowed with enough latitude to determine,
No. Print media may not be compelled to allocate free prevent and disallow irregular, unnecessary, excessive,
space to the Commission. Such would amount to a taking extravagant or unconscionable expenditures of
of property without just compensation. (Philippine Press government funds. In resc.,lving cases brought before it on
Institute v. COMELEC, GR No 119694, May 22, 1995) appeal, respondent COA is not required to limit its review
only to the grounds relied upon by a government agency's
Can the COMELEC regulate expressions made by auditor with respect to disallowing certain disbursements
private citizens?. of public funds. In consonance with its general audit
No. COMELEC had no legal basis to regulate expressions power, respondent COA is not merely legally permitted, but
made by private citizens. As such, COMELEC's order to is also duty-bound to make its own assessment of the
remove the tarpaulin posted by the Diocese of 8acolod merits of the disallowed disbursement and Mt simply
bearing the heading 'Conscience Vote' was restrict itself to reviewing the validity of the ground relied
unconstitutional. (Diocese of Bacotod v COMELEC, GR No upon by the auditor of the £,overnment agency
205728, January 21, 2()15) concerned. To hold otherwise wou!d render COA's vital
constitutional power unduiy limited and thereby useless
COMMISSION ON AUDIT and ineffective (Yap v. Commission on Audit, G.R.
No.158562, 2010).
Composition
1 Chairman, 2 Commissioners Funds cannot be released without auditing in pre-audit
while in post-audit, the auditing is done only after the
Qualifications funds are released.
1. Natural born citizen;
2. At least 35 years old at the time of appointment To settle government accounts
3. CPAs with at least 10 years auditing experience or - This means the power to settle liquidates accounts i.e.
members of the Bar with at least 10 years of accounts which may be adjusted simply by an arithmetical
experience in the practice of law; at no time shall all process. It does not include the power to fix the amount of
members belong to the same profession, and an unfixed or undetermined debl
4. Not a candidate in any election immediately preceding
appointment (CONST. Art. IX-D,Sec.1, Par(1)) To define the scope and techniques for its own auditing
procedures;
Appointment and Term To promulgate accounting and auditing rules i11cluding
Appointed by the President with the consent of the those for the prevention and disallowance of irregular,
Commission of Appointments for a term of 7 years, without unnecessary, excessive, extravagant, or unconscionable
reappointment. expenditures;
Appointment to any vacancy shall only be for the unexpired Conduct post-audit with respect to the following:
portion of the term of the predecessor. - Constitutional bodies, commissions, and offices granted
fiscal autonomy
In no case shall any member be appointed or designated - Autonomous state colleges and universities
in a temporary or acling capacity. (CONST. Art. IX-D, - GOCCs and their subsidiaries incorporated under the
Sec.1, Par.(2)) Corporation Code
- Non-governmental entities receiving subsidy or equity,
Powers and Duties of the Commission directly or indirectly, from or through the government,
Examine, audit, and settle all accounts pertaininq to: which are required by law, through the granting institution, .• ... .
• Revenue and receipts of funds or property to submit to such audit.
• Expenditures and uses of funds or property ownec - To decide administrative cases involving expenditure of
or held in trust by, or pertain to: public funds (CONST. Art. IX-D, Sec.2)
a. The Government
b. Any of its subdivisions, agencie:3 or If COA finds the internal control system of audited
instrumentalities agencies inadequate, COA may adopt measures,
c. GOCCs with original charters. including temporary or special pre-audit, as necessary to
' correct deficiencies. ' <-i,: ..~
Page 74 of 320
ATENEO CENTRAL
BAR OPERATIONS 2019 POLITICAL LAW
Keep the general accounts of the government, preserving COA is generally accorded complete discretion in the
vouchers and other supportinq papers pertaining thereto. exercise of its constitutional duty and responsibility to
examine and audit expenditures of public funds. Only in
The functions of COA can be classified as: instances when COA acts without or in excess of
1. Examining and auditi,1g all forms of government jurisdiction or with grave abuse of discretion amounting to
revenues and expenditures lack or excess of jurisdiction shall the Court interfere. Thus,
2. Settling government accounts · COA can disallow TESDA from paying a healthcare
3. Promulgating accounting and auditing rules allowance to their employees. (TESDA v. COA, G.R. No.
4. Deciding admlnistrative cases involving expenditures 196418, Feb 10, 2015)
of public funds.
Jurisdiction
COA's non-exclusive power to audit 1. Of the Commission in General: No law shall be passed
The COA does not have the exclusive power to examine exempting any entity of the Government, or any
and audit governn:ient entities. As such, public investment of public funds, from the jurisdiction of the
corporations under COA, jurisdiction may employ private ' COA (CONST.Art. IX-0, Sec.3)
auditors. However, COA's findings and conclusions 2. Over GOCCs: The Constitution vests in the COA audit
necessarily prevail over those of private auditors, at least jt_;risdiction over 'government-owned and controlled
Insofar as government agencies and officials are corporations with original charters, as well as
concerned (OBP v COA, GR No. 88435, January ·t 6, 2002) 3. government owr.ed or controlled corporations without
Thus, private auditors can be hired but if there Is a conflict, original charters'. GOCCs with original charters are
COA audit prevails. · subject to COA pre-audit, while GOCCs without
original charters are subject to COA post-audit. The
Prosecutors Power to Review Accounts Settled by determining factor of COA's audit jurisdiction is
COA government ownership or control of the corporation.
Prosecutors may still review accounts already settled and 4. Over LGUs: LGUs, through granted local fiscal
approved by COA for the purpose of dstermlninq possible autonomy are still within the audtt jurisdiction of the
criminal liability. This: is because COA's interest in such COA (Veloso v COA, GR No. 193677, September 6,
accounts is merely adrnlnistrative. 2011)
Exclusive Authority to Define Scope of Audit and COA authority in Public Bidding
Examination · COA has the power to detennine the meaning of 'public
Pursuant to its mandate as the guardians of public funds, bidding' and what constitutes failure of the same when
the COA has the exclusive authority to define the scope of regulations require public bidding for the sale of
its audit and examination, establish the techniques and governmenl property.
methods for such review and promulgate accounting and
auditing rules and regulations (Veloso v. Commission on JURISDICTION OF EACH
... Audit, G.R. No. 193677, 2011). CONSTITUTIONALCOMMISSION
; ... ~
What are Consldered Private Corporations Civil Service Commission
Note that not all corporations, which are not government Scopo: All branches, subdivisions, instrumentalities,
owned or controlled. are ipso facto to be considered private agencies of the government, including government owned
corporations as there exists another distinct class of and controlled corporations with original charters.
corporations or chartered institutions which are otherwise
~· \
' . known as "public corporations." These corporations are
treated by law as agencies or instrumentalities of the
• "With Original Charter" means that the GOCC was
created by special law or by Congress
government. As presently constituted, the BSP is a public If incorporated under the Corporation Code, it does not
corporation created t.iy law for a public purpose, and being· fall within the Civil Service and is not subject to the
such the funds of the BSP fall under the jurisdiction of the CSC jurisdiction
Commission on Audit. (Boy Scouts of the Philippines v. • If previously government-controlled, but is later
s ;.
1
'--'
:- GOA, G.R. No. 177131, June 7, 2011) privatized, it ceases to fall under CSC
• Jurisdiction is determined as of the time of filing the
'".. , ....:··.... Complete Discretion afforded to COA complaint.
Page 75 of 320
. . .....
--~--------------·----- ·-· --·----------------------
ATENEO CENTRAL
BAR OPERATIONS 2019 POLITICAL LAW
prevent and disallow irregular, unnecessary, excessive, How Commission decides Matters or Cases
extravagant or unconscionable expenditures of Each commission shall decide matters or cases by a
government funds. In resolving cases brought before it on majority vote of all its members within 60 days from
appeal, respondent COA is not required to limit its review' submission. The rule on majority vote shall apply both in a
only to the grounds relied upon by a government agency's division or en bane.
auditor with respect to disallowing certain disbursements •... r
of public funds. In consonance with its general audit Who constitutes 'majority'
power, respondent COA is not merely legally permitted, but This prevision is clear when it says that the voting should
is also duty-bound to make its own assessment of the be a majority vote of all its members and not only of those
merits of the disallowed disbursement and not simply · who participated in the deliberation and voted therein.
restrict itself to reviewing the validity of the ground relied
upon by the auditor of the government agency
concerned. To hold otherwise would render COA's vital Effect of Resignation of a Co~missloner
constitutional power unduly limited and thereby useless When a commissioner resigns, it does not automatically
and ineffective (Yap v. Commission on Audit, G.R. invalidate the decision. So long as the required majority of
No.158562, 2010). the commission is still achieved despite the withdrawal of
the vote of the one who resigned, the decision shall stand.
Page 76 of 320
ATENEO CENTRAL
BAR OPERATIONS 2019 POLITICAL LAW
o Exception: COMELEC may sit en bane or in 2 to bring the appeal (PD 807, sec. 37- 39); (CSC v.
divisions. Dacoycoy, G.R. No. 135805, 1999).
How Election cases are decided on . Enforcement - It has been held that the CSC can issue a
Election cases, including pre-proclamation controversies writ of execution to enforce judgments, which is deemed
are decided in division, with motions for reconsideration final.
filed to the COMELEC en bane.
---- end of topic--· --
Majority decision of a Division
The SC has held that a majority decision decided by a
division of the COMELEC is valid.
Page 77 of 320
~-----~-·- -·· - ...
ATENEO CENTRAL
BAR OPERATIONS 2019 POLITICAL LAW
t.....:.~·
2. Watch-list and Hold Dpearture Orders
J. Right to Information I
1. Scope and Limitations
2. Publication of Laws and Regulations • <
Page 78 of 320
\.. ~r
ATENEO CENTRAL
BAR OPERATIONS 2019 POLITICAL LAW
' '
\_)
ATENEO CENTRAL
BAR OPERATIONS 2019 POLITICAL LAW
\ ·
ATENEO CENTRAL
BAR OPERATIONS 2019 POLITICAL LAW
_.,...
....
ATENEO CENTRAL
BAR OPERATIONS 2019
POLITICAL LAW
May be exercised only by the government' or its May be granted to public service
· political subdivisions. companies or public utilities,
The use of the property The property (generally The property is "taken" for public
is "regulated" for the in the form of money) is use or benefit, hence, it must be
purpose of promoting taken for the support of compensated.
the general welfare, government.
hence it is not
compensable.
The person affected Person affected receives The person affected receives the full
receives no direct and the equivalent of the tax and fair market value of the property
immediate benefit but in the form of protection, taken from him.
only such as may arise public improvements,
from the maintenance and benefits he receives
of a healthy economic from the government as
standard of society and such. Therefore, taxation
is often referred i'.o as may be used as an
... =
damnurn absque implement. of police
injuria, i.e., "damage power (Lutz v. Araneta, t -,
~
without injury." 1955)
The amount imposed There is g1merally no There is no amount imposed but ·
should not be more limit to the amount that rather the owner Is paid the market ·
than sufficient to cover may be imposed. · value of the property taken. ·
the cost-of the license
and the necessary
expense of police
surveillance and
inspection,
examination, or
regulation as nearly as
can be estimated.
::..... . ·.·
', ......
ATENEO CENTRAL
BAR OPERATIONS 2019 POLITICAL LAW
PRIVATE ACTS AND BILL OF RIGH..I§. Concept and aspects of Due Process, In General
· .Purpose of Due Process
Conceptually, the set of fundamental human rights and Due process evades a precise definition. The purpose of
freedoms contained in the Bill of Rights, whether civil or the quaranty is to prevent arbitrary governmental
political in character, serve as a limitation on the exercise encroachment against the life, liberty, and property of
of governmental power. Even in the absence of a indiv:duals. The due process guaranty serves as a
Constitution, fundamental human rights may be invoked protection against arbitrary regulation or seizure. Even
before the courts for the protection of citizenry. corporations and partnerships are protected by the
guaranty insofar as their property is concerned (White
The Bill of Rights governs the relationship between the Light Corporation v. City of Manila, G.R. No. 122846,
individual and the state. Its concern is not the relation 2009).
betw3en individuals, between a private individual and other
individuals. What the Bill of Rights does is to declare some The due process guaranty has traditionally been
forbidden zones in the private sphere inaccessible to any interpreted as imposing two related but distinct restrictions
power holder [People v. Marti, G.R. No. 81561 (1991 )]. on governn1ent, "procedural due process" and "substantive
due process. (id.).
The constitutional proscription against unlawful searches
and seizures therefore applies as a restraint directed only Due process of law, in any particular case, means such an
against the government and its agencies tasked with the exercise of the powers of the govornment as the settled
enforcement of the law. If the violation is by private maxims of law permit and sanction and under such
individuals, the remedy is found in the Civil Code, or If safeguards for the protection of individual rights as those
proper, in the Revised Penal Code. (Bernas, The 1987 maxims prescribe for the class of cases to which the one
Constitution of the Republic of the Philippines, 2009) in question belongs. (U.S. v. Ling Su Fan, 10 Phil. Rep.,
\.. ,/
104, 111, 1908; Moyerv. Peabody, 212 U.S. 78, 1909).
Human rights have a primacy over property rights. The
rights of free expression and of assembly occupy a Due process of law, in its broad concept, is a principle in
preferred position as they are essential to the preservation our legal system that mandates due protection to the basic
and vitality of civil institutions [Philippine Blooming Mills rights, inherent or accorded, of every person against harm
Employment Organization v. Philippine Blooming Mills, or transgression without an intrinsically just and valid law,
Co., G.R. No. L-31195 (1973)]. as well as an opportunity to be heard before an impartial
tribunal, that can warrant such an impairment. Due process
The Bill of Rights governs tho relationship between the guarantees against arbitrariness and bears on both
I .
individual and the state. Its concern is not the relation substance and procedure. Substantive due process
between individuals, between a private individual and other concerns itself with the law, its essence, and its
individuals. What the Bill of Rights does is to declare some concomitant efficacy; procedural due process focuses on
forbidden zones in the private sphere inaccessible to any the rules that are established In order to ensure meaningful
power holder [People v. Marti, supra). adjudications appurtenant thereto. (Separate Opinion of
I° ~
· ..... Justice Vitug in Serrano v. NLRC, G. R. No. 11704(), 2000).
DUE PROCESS - THE RIGHTS TO LIFE LIBERTY AND
PROPERTY The Court cannot set the benchmark of due process at the
lowest level by considering each pleading submitted by a
~... ~: No person shall be deprived of life, liberty, or property party as enough to satisfy the requirements of this
,.. .. without due process of law, nor shall any person be denied Constitutional protection. If the Court is to animate the spirit
1.,.,, the equal protection of the laws (Phil. Const., art. 111, § 1 ) . of the Constitution and maintain in full strength the
substance of the due process protectloo, it must afford
All natural persons, and artificial persons, only in so far as each party the full legal opportunity to be heard and
their property is concerned, are protected by the Due present evidence in support of his or her contentions. A
Process clause. (Smith Bell & Co. v, Natividad, G.R. No. party must, therefore, be given full opportunity to proffer
15574, 1919) . evidence on its claim of ownership over the treasury
.- ~
shares in a proper case before the right court. (Philippine
Coconut Producers Federation, inc., et al. v. Republic ot
the Philippines, G.R. Nos. 177857-58, .W16)
Page 83 of 320
.<:»,.
ATENEO CENTRAL
BAR OPERATIONS 2019 POLITICAL LAW
Types of Due Process undue deprivation of the right to property. The petitioners
1. Procedural - Procedural due process refers to the argued that the data preservation order that law
procedures that the government must follow before it enforcement authorities are empowered to issue is a form
deprives a person of life, liberty, or property. of garnishment of perscnal property in civil forfeiture
Procedural due process concerns itself with proceedings and that such order prevents internet users
government action adhering to the established from accessing and disposing of traffic data that essentially
process when it makes an intrusion into the pnvate · belong to them. The court upheld the section explaining
sphere. (White Light Corporation v. City of Manila, that the data that service providers preserve on orders of
G.R. No. 122846, 2009). law enforcement authorities are not made inaccessible to
2. Substantive - If due process were confined solely to users by reason of the issuance of such orders. The
Its procedural aspects, there would arise absurd process of preserving data will not unduly hamper the
situation of arbitrary government action, provided the normal transmission or use of the same. (Dlsini v. Sec. of
proper formalities are followed. Substantive due Justice, G.R. No. 203335, 2014).
process completes the protection envisioned by the
due process clause. It Inquires whether the Relatlvity of Due Process
government has sufficient justification for depriving a The concept of due process is not a static one. "What due
person of life, liberty, or property. (White Light process is depends on circumstances. It varies with the .
Corporation v. City of Manila, G.R. No. 122846, 2009). subject matter and the necessities of the situation." (Moyer
v. Peabody, Governor of Colorado, 212 U.S. 78, 1909)
The Rights to Life, Liberty, and Property
Life I Procedural and Substantive Due Process
not just a protection of the right to be alive or to the security
of one's limb against physical harm; it is also the right to a Procedural Due Process
good life characterized by "dignity" and "a decent standard Procedural due process refers · to the procedure that
of living." Article 2 extends the protection to the life of the government agencies must follow in the enforcement and ·
unborn. application of laws. It contemplates notice and opportunity
to be heard before judgment is rendered affecting one's
Liberty person or property. (Fabe/fa v. Court of Appeals, G.R. No.
includes the right to exist and the right to be free from 110379, 1997).
arbitrary personal restraint or servitude.
Adversarial proceeding becomes necessary only when
Property there is a need to propound searching questions to unclear
includes all kinds of property in the Civil Code, including witnesses, a procedural right which the employee must ask
vested rights such as a perfected mining claim, or a for. Where the dismissal of the employee from service is
perfected homestead, or a final judgment, the right to work due to dishonesty or for a just cause but due process was
and earn a living. But does not include mere privileges not observed as no hearing was conducted despite her
granted by the government, i.e., licenses. (sernas, The request, the employer should be held liable for indemnity .
in the form or' nominal damages. (Lavador v. "J" Marketing ' .
1987 Constitutior. of the Republic of the Philippines, 2009). \~..;:
Corporation, G.R. No. 157757, 2005).
When Right Vested
"A right is vested when the right to enjoyment has become Three copies of every administrative issuance should be
the property of some particular person or persons as a filed in the Office of the National Administrative Reyister
present interest." (16 C.J.S. 1173). It is "the privilege to (ONAR) of the UP Law Center. Non-compliance makes it
f· ··~.
enjoy property legally vested, to enforce contracts, and invalid and it may not be enforced. This requirement is put ~~,. - .
enjoy the rights of property conferred by existing law· (12 into place as a guarantee to the constitutional right to due
C.J. 955, Note 46, No. 6) or "some right or interest in process. (Republic v. Pilipinas Shell, G.R. No. 173918, .!' "'.:·
2008).
property which has become fixed and established and is
no longer open to doubt or controversy" (Downs v. Blount,
170 Fed. 15, 20, cited in Balboa v. Farra/es, 51 Phi/, 498, However, not all rules and regulations adooted by every
government agency are to be filed with the UP Law Center. .. '...
·, ..:-
::,
Interpretative regulations and those merely internal in parties to the proceeding can Know
nature, that is, regulating omy the personnel of the the various issues involved and the
Adrninlstrative agency and not the public, need not be filed reasons for the decision rendered
with the UP Law Center. (The Board of Trustees of the
Government Service Insurance System v. Albert Velasco, What is required is not actual hearing,
G.R. No. 170463, 201'1). but a real opportunity to be heard.
The requirement of due process can
Standards for Different Types of Proceedings be satisfied by subsequent due
hearing.
TYPE STANDARD Notice and hearing are required in
i--~~~~-+~~~~~~~~~~~~-·- judicial and quasi-judicial proceedings,
Judicial CODE: (Ju3NO) but not in the promulgation of a
Proceedings 1. An Impartial court or tribunal general rule.
clothed with Judicial power to hear
and determine the matter before it. ., Academic CODE: {FACE3)
2. Jyrisdiction must be lawfully Institutions f 1. The penalty imposed must be
acquired over the person or subject School f.roportionate to the offense.
matter. Disl':plinary 2. The student shall have the right to
Proceedings Answer the charges against him, with
Service of summons is not only the assistance of counsel if desired.
required to give the court jurisdiction 3. The student must be informed in
over the person of the defendant but writing of the nature and .Qause of any
also to afford the latter the opportunity accusation against them.
to be heard on the claim made against 4. The student has the right to be
him. Thus, compliance with the rules informed of the gvidence against him.
regarding the service of summons is 5. The student has the right to
as much an issue of due process as of adduce §vidence in his own behalf.
jurisdiction (Sarmiento v. Raon, G.R. 6. The gvidence must be duly
No. 157219, 2004) considered by the investigating
committee or official designated by the
3. Judgment must be rendered upon a school authorities to hear and decide
lawful hearing. the case.
4. The defendant must be given • Proceedinqs in student disciplinary
Notice and an Qpportunity to be cases may be summary; cross-
heard. examination is not essential.
• The school has a contractual
Adminisirative CODE: (HIP-DESK) obligation to afford its students a
and Quasi- 1. The right to a Hearing, which fair opportunity to complete the
~~ ·,,.. Judicial includes the right to present one's
. - Proceedings case and subrnlt evidence in support
course they seek to pursue.
Exceptions:
thereof. 1. Serious breach of discipline
2. The tribunal or body or any of i_ts 2. Failure to maintain the required
judges must act on its or his own academic standard
Independent consideration of the law
and facts of the controversy Deportation CODE: (Gin-HO)
3. The decision must be based on the Proceedings 1. There should be a prior
evidence Presented at the hearing or determination by the Board of
.,· ~ at least contair.ed in the record and Commissioners of the existence
disclosed to the parties affected. of, the !zround as charged against
4. The Decision must have something the alien.
to support itself. 2. The alien should be Informed of
!: !.
5. The tribunal must consider the lhe specific grounds for
Evidence presented. deportation.
6. Evidence supporting the conclusion 3. A .!:!earing should be conducted
must be Substantial. · pursuant to the Rules of
7. The board or body should, in all Procedure presented by the CID
.· ,. ccntroversial questions, render its
t.J Commissicner .
decision m such a manner that the
Page 85 of 320
"'--•
t, ..I
ATENEO CEN1RAL
BAR OPERATIONS 2019 POLITICAL LAW
a crime.
9. Suspension 01 a bank's operations by the Monetary
Board upon a prima facie finding of liquidity problems
in such bank.
Page 86 of 320
· .. ~
-------- - - .
ATENEO CENTRAL
BAR OPERATIONS 2019 POLITICAL LAW
..... t·
'<•• ,...i.,''
ATENEO CENTRAL
BAR OPERATIONS 2019 POLITICAL LAW
impunity. A prehrnlnary investig:::ition serves not only the VOID FOR VAGUENESS DOCTRINE
purposes of the State. More importantly, it is a part of the Void for Vagueness Doctrine ·
guarantees of freedom and fair play, which are birthrights A statute which either forbids or requires the doing of an
of all who live in our country. (Sa/onga v. Panon, G.R. No. act in terms so vague that men of common intelligence
59524, 1985). must necessarily guess at its meaning and differ as to its
application violates the essential of due process of law
JUDICIAL STANDARD FOR REVIEW (Estrada v. Sandiganbayan, G.R. No. 148560, 2001).
Jurisprudence has developed three kinds of test
depending on the subject matter involved {Bernas. The
A vague law is unconstitutional because:
1987 Constitution of the Republic of the Philippines, 2009).
• It violates due process for failure to accord persons fair
Tests are also applicable to Equal Protection Cases. notice of the conduct to avoid.
1. Strict scrutiny test • the focus is on the presence of • Law enforr:ers have unbridled discretion in carrying out
compelling, rather than substantial, governmental its provisions. ·
interest and on the absence of less restrictive means
for achieving that interest. In terms of judicial review of The RH Law is not void under the void for vagueness
statutes or ordinances, it refers to the standard for doctrine merely due to insufficiency of definition of some
determining the quality and the amount of terms. In determining whether the words used in a statute
governmental intorest brought to justify the regulation are vague, words must not only be taken in accordance
of fundamental freedoms, it is used today to test the with their plain meaning alone, but also in relation to other
validity of laws dealing with the regulation of speech, parts of the statute. It is a rule that every part of the statute
gender, or race as well as other fundamental rights; its must be interpreted with reference to the context, that is,
scope has been expanded to protect fundamental every part of it must be construed together with the other
rights such as suffrage, judicial access, and interstate parts and kept subservient to the general intent of the
travel (White Light Corporation v. City of Manila,. G.R. whole enactment (lmbong v. Ochoa, G.R. 204819, 2014).
No. 122846, 2009).
BERNABE: Verily, the objective of curbing unbridled
2. Intermediate scrutiny test • classification is at least' enforcement is not the sole consideration in a void for
substantially related to serving an important state vagueness analysis; rather, petitioners must show that this
interest. It applied traditionally to suspect perceived danger of unbridled enforcement stems from
classifications tike gender or illegitimacy. It is used in an ambiguous provision In the law that allows
\ .
dlscrirnlnatlons based on gender or illegitimacy of enforcement authorities to second-guess if a
children. Under the intermediate scrutiny test, the particular conduct Is prohibited or not prohibited. in
classification must be substantially related to an this regard, that amhiguous provision of law contravenes
important government objective (League of Cities v. due process because agents of the government cannot
COMELEC. G.R. No. 176951, 2008). reasonably decipher what conduct the law permits and/or
forbids.
3. Rational basis test· classification is rationally related
to serving a legitimate state interest. This is the most Here, petitioners fail to point out any ambiguous standard
liberal test. It is often used to all subjects other than in any of the provisions of the Curfew Ordinances, but
those listed above. (Bernas, The 1987 Constitution of rather, lament the lack of detail on how the age of a
the Republic of the Philippines. 2009). suspected minor would be determined. Without any
correlation to any vague legal provision, the Curfew
Overcome the presumption of constitutionality Ordinances cannot be stricken down under the void
To overcome the presumption of constitutionality, it must for vagueness doctrine (SPARK v. QC, G. R. No. 225442.
be demonstrated explicitly that the classification is hostile, 2017).
oppressive and discriminatory against particular persons
and classes and that there is no conceivable basis, which Overbreadth Doctrine
might support it. A government purpose may not be achleved by means,
which sweep unnecessarily broadly and thereby invade the
',
i. ~
.. ....,·.
area of protected freedoms (Estrada v. Sandiganbayan,
f."
G.R. No. 148560, 2001). 'L;
Page 88 of 320
·- .......
ATENEO CENTRAL
BAR OPERATIONS 2019 POLITICAL LAW
Analytical tools developed for testing "on their faces" chances as in the area of free speech (Estrada v.
statutes Sandiganbayan, G.R. No. 148560. 2001).
The doctrines of strict scrutiny, overbreadth, and.
vagueness are analytical tools developed for testing "on "Aiding or abetting" in the commission of any offense or
their faces" statutes in free speech cases or, as they are "attempting" to commit any offense punished in the
called in American law, First Amendment cases ... With Cybercrime Prevention is overbroad. A user can post a
respect to such statute, the established rule is that 'one to statement, a photo or a video on Facebook. If the post is
whom application of a statute is constitutional will not be made available to the pub'lc, anyone can react by clicking
heard to attack the statute on the ground that impliedly :t "Like.• "Comment" enables him to post his feelings or
might also be taken as applying to other persons or other views. "Share• makes the post visible to his friends in the
situations · in which its application might be social network. Except from the original author of the
unconstitutional.' As has been pointed out, 'vagueness assailed statement, the rest are knee-jerk sentiments of
challenges in · the First Amendment context, like readers who may think little or haphazardly of their
overbreadth challenges typically produce facial response to the posting. Unless the law takes into account
invalidation, whlle statutes found vague as a matter of due the unique circumstances and culture of cyberspace, such
process typically are invalidated only 'as applied' to a a law will create a cl,illing effect on those who express
particular defendant (Romualdez v. Sandlganbayan, G.R. themselves through cyberspace. Thus, Section 5, which
No. 152259, 2004). punishes "aiding or abetting" libel on cyberspace Is void
(Dislniv. Sec. of Justice, G.R. No. 203335, 2014).
Facial Invalidation
... an examination of the entire law, pinpointing its flaws and Void For Vagueness v. Overbreadth
'
defects, not only on the basis of Its actual operation to the 1. Vagueness and overbreadth are distinct from each
parties, but also on the assumption or prediction that its other; a vaque law must lack clarity and precision,
very existence may cause others not before the court to while an overbroad law need not.
refrain from constitutionally protected speech or 2. It ;s submitted that while the defect of overbreadth as
activities. (Southern Hemisphere Engagement Network, an analytical tool is applicable only to cases involving
Inc., et al. v. Ami-Tetrorism Council, et a!.; KMU, et al. v. speech, this is not so about vagueness (Bernas, The
Hon. EduardoErmita, et al. G.R. Nos. 178552, 178554, 1987 Constitution of the Republic of the Philippines,
2010). 2009).
',,r
A TENEO CEN1 RAL
BAR OPERATION3 2019
POLITICAL LAW
-,---1-i-lE-=R_A_R_C_H_Y
__O_F_R~l"'!'G~H~T~S--------::S~ec-t:'!"'ion-6:-o~f ...e...re
-:-:th-e~C-.yb ...r.,...im"""e~P...
re'."."v::e::nt:;:io:-:n-A:".c::,t~i::m::po:'.s:;".in::g
Primacy of human rights over property rights is . penalty one degree higher than that provided in the RPC
recognized. for acts committed by, through and with the use of
While the Bill of Rights also protects property rights, the . information and communlcatlons technologies was
primacy of human rights over property rights is recognized. assailed for violating equal protection. The Court upheld
Property and property rights can he lost thru prescription; the section and explained that Section 6 merely makes
but human rights are imprescriptible. The superiority of commission of existing crimes through the internet a
these freedoms over property rights is underscored by the qualifying circumstance. There exists a substantial
fact that a mere reasonable or rational relation between the distinctlon between crimes committed through the use of
means employed by the law and its object or purpose - information and communications technology and similar
that the law is neither arbitrary nor discriminatory nor crimes committed using other means. In using the
oppressive - would suffice to validate a law which restricts technology in question, the offender often evades
or impairs property rights. (Phi/fppine Blooming •Mills identification and is able to reach far more victims or cause
Employment Organization v. Philippine Blooming Mills Co., greater harm. The distinction, therefore, creates a basis for
G.R. No. L-31195, 1973). higher penalties for cybercrirnes (Disini v. Secretary of
' Justice, G.R. No. 203335, 2014).
EQUAL PROTECTION
The OAP was challenged as "unfair as it [was] selective"
CONCEPT because tho funds released under the OAP was not made
The Equal Protection clause guarantees equality of all available to all the legislators, with some of them refusing
persons before the law. It does not demand absolute to avail themselves of the OAP funds, and others being
equality. It merely requires that all persons shall be treated unaware of the availability of such funds. The Court held
alike, under like circumstances and conditions both as to that the challenge based on the contravention of the Equal
privileges conferred and liabilities enforced. Protection Clause, which focuses on the release of funds
under the OAP to legislators, lacks factual and legal basis.
Protection against undue favor and individual or class · The denial of equal protection of any law should be an
privilege, as well as hostile discrimination or the issue to be raised only by parties who supposedly suffer it,
oppression of inequality. and, in · these cases, such parties would be the few
The equal protection of the law clause is against undue legislators claimed to have been disc, iminated against in
favor and individual or class privilege, as well as hostile the releases of funds under the OAP. The requirement was
discrimination or the oppression of inequality. It is not not rnet here (Arau/lo v. Aquino Ill, G.R. No. 209287,
·,,
intended to orohibit legislation which is limited either [by} 2014).
the object to which it is directed or by [the} territory within : ~ I'
which it is to operate. It does not demand absolute equality REQUISITES FOR VALID CLASSIFICATION: (GEES)
among residents; it m".lrely requires that all persons shall 1. Be Qermane to the purposes of the law
be treated alike, under like circumstances and conditions · 2. Not limited to Existing conditions only
both as to privileges conferred and liabilities enforced 3. Applied Equally to all members of the same class.
(lchong v. Hernandez, G.R. No. L-7995, 1957). · 4. Rest on Substant!al distinctions (People v. Cayat,
G.R. No. L·45987, 1939).
Not a guaranty of equality
The guaranty of equal protection of the laws is not a Validity of Classification freeze provision
guaranty of equality in the application of the laws upon all The classification freeze provision does not violate the
citizens of the state. It is not, therefore, a requirement, in equal protection and uniformity of taxation. Even though it
order to avoid the constitutional prohibition against failed to promote fair competition among the players in the
inequality, that every man, woman and child should be industry, the classification freeze provision was not
-"":;,~
affected alike by a statute. Equality of operation of statutes precipitated by a veiled attempt or hostile attitude on the
does not mean indiscriminate operation on persons merely part of Congress to unduly favor older brands. Since the
· as such, but on persons according to the circumstances provision was done in good faith and is germane to the
surrounding them. It guarantee:. equality, not identity of purpose of the law, the Court cannot declare it r:
rights (Victoriano v. Elizalde Rope Wor.l<ers' Union, G.R. unconstitutional nor question its wisdom. (British American ~ ,,I
Page 90 of 320
ATENEO CENTRAL
BAR OPERATIONS 2019 POLITICAL LAW
' .r
',
they be given priority in addressing the health development rank and file employees of all GFls from the Salary
of the people. It should be noted that Section 7 of the RH Standardization Law, was rendered void on account of a
Law prioritizes poor and marginalized couples who are violation of the equal protection clause (Central Bank
suffering from fertility issues and desire to have children Employees Association, Inc. v. Bangko Sentral ng
(lmbong v. Ochoa, G.R. 204819, 2014). , Pilipinas, G.R. No. 148208, 2004).
STANDARDS OF JUDICIAL REVIEW means to protect such interest (Bernas, The 1987
Constitution of the Republic of the Philippines, 2009).
Standards of Judicial Review of the constitutionality of ,
a classification imbued in a statute Strict scrutiny test, which is used to review laws dealing
The equality guaranteed by the Equal Protection Clause is with freedom of the mind or restricting the political process,
not a dlsernoodied equality. It recognized that inherent in focuses on the presence of .
the right to legislate is the right to classify. The problem is • Compelling governmental interest; and on
one of determining the validity of the classification made by • The absence of less restricting means for
law. Jurisprudence has developed three kinds of test achieving such interest. (White Light Corporation
depending on the subject matter involved (Bernas, The v. City of Ma,1ila, G.R. No. 122846, 2009).
1987 Constitution of the Republic of the Philippines, 2009).
BERNABE: Jurisprudence holds that compellinq State
Rational Basis Scrutiny interests include constitutionally declared policies. The
The challenged classification needs only be shown to be Court has ruled that children's welfare and the State's
rationally related to serving a legitimate state interest mandate to protect and care for them as parens
(Bernas, The 1987 Constitution of the Republic pf the patrlae constitute · compelling interests to Justify
Philippines, 2009). regulations by the State. It is akin to the paramount
interest of the state for which some individual liberties must
Rational basis examination, which is used to review give way.
economic legislation, is a test to see if laws or ordinances
rationally further a legitimate governmental interest. (White Althouoh treated differently from adults, the foregoing
Light Corporation v. City of Manila, G.R. No. 122846, standard applies to regulations on minors as they are still
2009). accorded the freedom to participate in any legitimate
activity, whether it be social, religious, or civic. Thus, in the
The rational basis test was properly applied to gauge the present case, each of the ordinances must be narrowly
constitutionality of the assailed law in the face of an equal tailored as to ensure minimal constraint not only on the
protection challenge. Under the rational basis test, it is minors' right to travel but also on their other constitutional
sufficient that the legislative classification is rationally rights: In this case, two ordinances were declared·
related to achieving some legitimate State interest. (British unconstitutional for do not account for the reasonable ·
American Tobacco v. Camacho, G.R. No. 163583, 2009). exercise of tho minors' rights of association, free exercise
of religion, rights to peaceabty assemble, and of free
Middle Tier or Intermediate Scrutiny expression, among others. (SPARK v. QC, G.R. No.
The government must shov, that the challenged 225442, 2017). ~...,·.::
classification serves an important state interest and that
the classification is at least substantially related to serving A differentiated rule of computation of the money claims of
that interest (Bernas, The 1987 Constitution of the illegally dismissed OFWs based on their employment
Republic of the Philippines, 200S'). periods violates the Equal Protection Clause because one
-.
category is singled out which . includes those whose
Immediate scrutiny test, which is used to review contracts have an unexpired portion of one year or more
classifications based on gender and legitimacy, and have their monetary awards limited to their salaries for
extensively examines governmental interest and the 3 months or for the unexpired portion, whichever is
availability of less restrictive measures is considered less. Imbued with the same sense of "obliqation to afford
(White Ught Corporation v. City of Manila, G.R. No. protection to labor," the Court in the present case also
122846, 2009). employs the standard of strict judicial scrutiny, for it
perceives in the subject clause a suspect classification
Strict Judicial Scrutiny prejudicial to OFWs {Serrano v. Gallant Maritime Service,
A legislative classlf'cation which impermissibly interferes G.R. No. 167614, 2009).
. . .....
with the exercise of a fundamental right or operates to the
peculiar disadvantage of a suspect class is presumed
unconstitutional, and the burden is upon the government
to prove that the classification is necessary to achieve a l :.
Page 92 of 320
., '
;_ .J
·--------·- - .
A TENEO CENTRAL
BAR OPERATIONS 2019 POLITICAL LAW
BERNABE: Considering that the right to travel is a WARRANT REQUIREMENTS Coda: PDEP
fundamental right in our legal system guaranteed no less · .1.
it must be based on Probable cause;
by our Constitution, the strict scrutiny test is the applicable 2.
Probable cause must be Determined personally by a
test. It should be emphasized that minors enjoy the same jt!dge;
constitutional rights as adults; the fact that the State has 3. The judge must Examine under oath or affirmation the
broader authority over minors than over adults does . complainant and the witnesses he may produce;
not trigger the application of a lower level of sci utlny 4. The warrant must Particularly describe the place to
(SPARK V. QC, supra). be searched and the person or things to be seized
(Phil. Const., art. Ill, § 2)
Page 93 of 320
'~··
ATENEO CENTRAL
BAR OPERATIONS 2019 POLITICAL LAW
CODE: JPEPO CODE: WIPE MS CACP The judge must, before issuing the search warrant,
1. The existence of 1. ~aiver of righUWith personally examine in the form of searching questions and
probable cause is Consent answers, in writing and under oath, the complainant and
determined personally by the witnesses he may produce on facts personally known
the Judge. , 2. Incidental to a l;3wful to them and attach to the record their sworn statements,
arrest
together with the affidavits submitted. (ROC, Rule 126, §
2. It must be issued upon
frobable cause. 3. flain view doctrine 5)' '':
3. The judge must ~xarnine 4.During sxigent and Note:· In issuing a warrant of arrest, the judge is not
under oath the complainant emergency situations required to examine personally the complainant and the
and the witnesses he may witnesses. He is only required to determine probable
produce. 5. Moving vehicle cause personally. He may satisfy himself by fiscal reports,
if not, he may require submission of affidavit of witnesses.
4. The warrant must 6. §top and frisk rule (Soliven v. Makasiar, G.R. No. 82585, 1988).
farticularly describe the
place to be searched and 7. Seizure of goods
person or things to be Warrant must particularly describe the place to be
concealed to avoid
seized. &ustoms duties (does not searched and the person or things to be seized
c.'pply If the place to be Section 2, Article Ill of the 1987 Constitution requires that
5. II must be in connection
with Qne specific offense.
I searched is a dwelling
house) .
a search warrant should particularly describe the things to'
be seized. "The evident purpose and intent of the
requirement is to limit the things to be seized to those, and
8 Airport searches only those, particularly described in the search warrant -
to leave the officers of the Jaw with no discretion regarding
9. &heckpoints what artides they should seize, to the end that
unreasonable searches and seizures may not be made
1. Warrantless search by
and that abuses may not be committed." (People v. Go,
a Private individual
G.R. No. 144639, 2003).
The Commissioner of
Immigration may order General Wa1Tants
the arrest of an alien in Do not allege any specific acts or omissions constituting
order to carry out a final the offense charged in the application for the issuance of
deportation order. the warrant. It contravenes the requisite that the things to
be seized be particularly described (Bernas, The 1987
Probable Cause . Constitution of the Republic of the Philippines, 2009).
• I
Refers to such facts and circumstances, which would lead ''-
a reasonably discreet and prudent man to believe that an Effect of a General Warrant
offense has been committed by the person sought to be It will be considered void (Nolasco v. Pano, G.R. No. L-
arrested (warrant of arrest) or that the objects sought In 69803, 1985).
connection with the offense are in the place to be searched • Exception: The whole warrant will not be voided if
(search warrant). Probable cause is concerned with other items were particularly described (Uy v. BIR,
probability, not ebsolute or moral certainty (Bernas, The G.R. No. 129651, 2000).
1987 Constitution of the Republic of the Philippines, 2009).
Searches with Warrant Requirement of particularity
~.
' .
A search warrant shall not Issue except upcn probable A search warrant may be said to particularly describe the
cause in connection with one specific offense to be things to be seized when the description therein is as
determined personally by the judge after examu :ation specific as the circumstances will ordinarily allow or when
under oath or affirmation of the complainant and the the description expresses a conclusion of fact - not of law
witnesses he may produce, and particularly describing the ., - by which the warrant officer may be guided in making the r':
;t• 1
search and seizure or when the things described are '-.:.
limited to those which bear a direct relation to the offense
Page 94 of 320
for which the warrant is being issued (Bache and Co. v. The offense of illegal poseession of firearms is malum
Ruiz, G.R. No. 32409, 1971; Worldwide Web Corporation prohibltum but it does not follow that the subject thereof is
v. People, G.R. 161106, 2014). necessarily illegal per se. Motive is immaterial in mala
prohibita but the subjects of this kind of offense may not be
A personal description, or descriptio personae is sufficient summarily seized simply because they are prohibited. A
to meet the requirement of particularity (People v. Rubio, search warrant is still necessary (soouses Veroy v.
G.R. No. L-35500, 1932). The principle is applicable Layague, G.R. No. L-95630, 1992).
mutatis mutandis to search warrants (Bernas, The 1987
Constitution of the Republic of the Philippines, 2009). Requirement is primarily meant to enable the law enforcers
serving the warrant to:
John Doe warrant • Readily identify the properties to be seized and
A John Doe warrant, in order to be valid, must contain a thus prevent them from seizing the wrong items;
descriptio personae such as to enable the officer to identify • Leave said peace officers with no discretion
the accused. (People v. Veloso, G.R. No. L-23051, 1925). , regarding the articles to be seized and thus
prevent unreasonable searches and seizures
A total of 42 search warrants were issued against the , (People v. Tee, G.R. Nos. 140546-47. 2003).
petitioners and corporations of which they are officers for
violation of Central Bank Laws, etc. The warrants Process of Search, Required presence of the lawful
mandated the seizure of all papers and documents occupant
pertaining to the said businesses, regardless of the legality No search of a house, room or any other premise shall be
of the transactions, in the offices and residences of made except in the presence of the lawful occupant thereof
petitioners. There was no specific offense charged and no qr any member of his family or in the absence of the latter,
reference to any particular provision of the law that was in the presence of two (2) witnesses of sufficient age and
violated. The SC held that the warrants were general, and discretion residing in the same locality (ROG, Rule 126, §
general warrants are outlawed by the Bill of Rights. 8).
Particular acts must be alleged and the things to be seized
must also be particularly described. A search warrant shall This requirement is mandatory to ensure requtarity in the
only issue upon probable cause in connection with one execution of the search warrant. The Rules of Court clearly
specific offense. The SC held the warrants were a fishing and explicitly establishes a hierarchy among the witnesses
expedition, making the evidence obtained from the said in whose presence the search of the premises must be
search inadmissible (Stonehill v. Oiokno, G.R. No. L- conducted. Thus, Section 8, Rule 126 provides that the
19550, 1967). search should be witnessed by "two witnesses of sufficient
age and discretion residing in the same locality" only in the
.,._. Extent of Specificity Required absence of either the lawful occupant of the premises or
The description is required to be specific only so far as the any member of his family (People v. Go, G.R. No. 144639,
»; r:
circumstances ordinarily allow and where, by the nature of 2003).
the goods to be seized, their description must be rather
·,'.... '·' general, it is not required that a technical description be When any court may Issue search warrant
given, as this would mean that no warrant could issue. A ln certain cases when no criminal action has yet been filed,
. ;.~.r· description substantially complies with the legal provisions any court may issue a search warrant even though It has
when the officer of the law who executed the warrant was no jurisdiction over the offense allegedly committed,
placed in a position enabling him to identify the articles to provided that all the requirements for the issuance of such
be seized. (Bernas, The 1987 Constitution of the Republic warrant are present. (People v. Hon. Edmar P. Castillo, Sr.,
of the Philippines, 2009). G.R. No. 204419, 2016) /·
Test of sufficiency of an affidavit for a search warrant "Knock and Announce" Principle in the Service of a
The test of sufficiency of an affidavit for a search warrant Search Warrant
.'. ..:;. is whether it has been drawn in such a manner that perjury
-:-; Police officers are obliged to give notice, show their
could be charged thereon and the affiant could be held authority, and demand that they be allowed entry. They
liable for the damages caused (Alvarez v. CF/, G.R. No. L- may only break open any outer or inner door or window of
45358, 1937). a house to execute the search warrant If, after such notice
and demand, such officers are refused entry to the place
Page 95 of 320
-----'-------=----- ----------------··-··--.
ATENEO CENTRAL
BAR OPERATIONS 2019 POLITICAL LAW
:'...... ~-
-
circumstances: WIPE MS CACP cause to make the arrest at the outset of the search.
1. ~ofright ' (People v. Bu/en Mariacos, G.R. No. 188611, 2010).
•.. c;,
10. Warrantless search by a Private individual (Note: This the right of the apprehending officers to conduct a
is found in Sec. 5, Rule 113 of the Rules of Court where warrantless search not only on the person of the suspect,
a private person may arrest a person without a but also in the permissible area within the latter's reach.
warrant) (Peop/€; v. Aruta, G.R. No. 120915, 1998) Otherwise stated, a valid arrest allows the seizure of
evidence or dangerous weapons either on the person of
Page 96 of 320
ATENEO CENTRAL
BAR OPERATIONS 2019 POLITICAL LAW
the one arrested or within the area of his immediate passports and immigration documents which they
control. The phrase "within the area of his immediate discovered in the course of their search. (People v. Go,
control" means the area from within which he might gain G.R. No. 144639, 2003).
possession of a weapon or destructible evidence (People
v. Calantiao, G.R. No. 203983, 2014). During Exigent and Emergency Situations (e.g., war,
prevailing chaos, disorder or ongoing coup d'etat)
The better established rule is a strict application of the In the event of a coup d'etat conducted by the "Reform the
exception provided in Rule 126, Sec. 12 (now Sec. 13) and Armed Forces Movement Soldiers of the Filipino People",
that is to absolutely limit a warrantless search of a person · the EUROCAR Building was put unoer surveillance
who is lawfully arrested to his or her person at the time of pursuant to an intelligence report that it housed large
and incident to his or her arrest and to "dangerous quantities of ammunition. During the operations, the car of
weapons or anything which may be used as proof of the the surveillance team was fired upon by 5 persons from a
commission of the offense." (Nolasco v. Pano, G.R. No. L- crowd within the vicinity of the EUROCAR Building. The
69803, 1987). team proceeded to the building without a warrant and was
able to seize de Gracia and plenty of explosives and
An officer making an arrest may take from the person: ammunition. The SC held that the arrests were impelled by
1. Any mor.ey or property found upon his person which the exigencies of the situation, which concerned the very
was used in the commission of the offense; or survival of society and the government. In this case, the
2. Was the fruit thereof; or military operatives had reasonable ground to believe that
3. Which might furnish the prisoner with the means of a crime was being committed. The team had no
committing violence or escaping; or opportunity to apply for a search warrant from the courts,
4. Which may be used in evidence in the trial of the case. as the court with jurisdiction, at that time, was closed due
to disorder. (People v. De Gracia, G. R. Nos. 102009-10,
Plain View Doctrine 1994).
Requisites: (VIAJ)
1. There was a prior Valid intrusion. ·, Moving Vehicle - limited to visual search
2. The evidence was Inadvertently discovered. Requisites: (EP)
3. The evidence is immediately Apparent. 1. This exception is based on Exigency. If there is time
4. Plain view is Justified seizure without further search to obtain a warrant in order to search tne vehicle, a
(People v. Compacion, G.R. No. 124442, 2001) warrant must first be obtained. (Coolidge v. New
Hampshire, 403 U.S. 443, 1971).
. ' The immediate requirement means that the executing 2. Must still be based on Probable cause (applies only to
officer can, at any time of discovery of the object or the extensive search of a moving vehicle). (Bernas, The
facts therein available to him, determine probable cause of 1987 Constitution of the Republic of the Philippines,
the object's incriminating evidence. Probable cause must 2009).
be the direct result of the officer's Instantaneous sensory
perception of the object. The immediately apparent test Limited to visual search - in checkpoint (Caballes v. CA,
·. ,•
does not require an unduly high degree of certainty as to G.R. No. 136292, 2002)
the incriminating character of the evidence. (United
Laboratories, Inc. v. Isip, G.R. No. 163858, 2005). A warrantless search of a vehicle that can be quickly
moved out of the locality or jurisdiction 1s valid. (Paople v.
The seizure of the passports, bankbooks, checks, CF/, G.R. No. L-41686, 1980).
typewriter, check writer, dry seals and stamp pads and
other assorted documents does not fall within the "plain A confidential informer tipped the police that a Gemini car
view" exception. The assertions of the police officers that was going to deliver shabu. When they stopped the car,
said objects were "inadvertently" seized within their "plain they saw a gun tucked in Tuazon's waist. He did not have
view" are mere legal conclusions which are not supported any documents, which strengthened the police's suspicion.
_by any clear narration of the factual circumstances leading After he was told to step out of the car, they found plastic
to their discovery. The supposed illegal character of the sachets containing shabu on the driver's seat. These
items claimed to have been seized within the "plain view" circumstances are sufficient to establish probable cause
of the policemen was not readily and immediately for the warrantless search of the car. Hence, the sachets
apparent. Rather, the suspicions of the policemen appear of shabu may be admitted as evidence. (People v. Tuazon,
to have been aroused by the presence of the numerous G.R. No. 175783, 2007).
.' '
.;,
· Page 97 of 320
ATENEO CENTRAL.
BAR OPERATIONS 2019 POLITICAL LAW
.
I----------·· ..... -
-:
ATENEO CENTRAL
BAR OPERATIONS 2019 POLITICAL LAW
To limit the search to visual searches would defeat the aim day. The apprehending officer was able to identify the
of the COMaEC to effect the gun ban. In this case. the markings and was able to explain how it was made.
method employed by authorities consisted of merely (People v. Montevirgen y Ozaraga, G.R. No. 189840,
stopping cars they deemed suspicious, such as those 2013).
whose windows are heavily tinted just to see if the
passengers thereof were carrying guns. At best they WARRANTLESS ARRESTS
merely directed their flasl 1lights inside the cars they would
stop, without opening the car's doors or subjecting its Arrest with Warrant v. Warrantless Arrest
passengers to a body search. There is nothing ARREST WITH
WARRANTLESS ARREST
discriminatory in this as this is what the situation demands WARRANT
(People v. Escano, G.R. Nos. 129756-58, 2000).
1. The existence of 1. When the person to be
Warrantless Searches by a Private Individual probable cause is arrested has
The rule that searches and seizures must be supported by determined committed, is actually
a valid warrant of arrest is not an absolute rule. What is personally by the committing, or is about
prohibited are "unreasonable searches and seizures." judge. to commit an offense in
Thus, a search made incidental to an arrest Is not 2. It must be issued the presence of the
prohibited. The purpose of this exception is to protect the upon probable arresting officer.
arresting officer against physical harm from the person cause. 2. When an offense has in
who is being arrested who might be armed 'Nith a 3. The judge must fact just been committed
concealed weapon and also to prevent the person arrested examine under oath and the arrestinq officer
from destroying evidence within his reach. (Moreno v. Ago the complainant and has probable cause to
Chi, G.R. No. L-4680, 1909). the witnesses he may believe based on
produce. personal knowledge of
If the search is made at the behest or initiative of the 4. The warrant must facts and circumstances
proprietor of a private establishment for its own and private particularly indicating that the
purposes, and without the intervention of police authorities, . describe the person person to be arrested
the right against unreasonable search and seizure cannot to be arrested. has committed it.
be invoked for only the act of a private individual. not tho 5. It must be in 3. When the person to be
law enforcers, is involved. In sum, the protection against connection with one arrested is a prisoner
unreasonable searches and seizures cannot be extended specific offense. who has escaped.
to acts committed by private individuals so as to bring it
within the ambit of alleged unlawful intrusion by the Arrest with Warrant
government. (People v. Marti, G.R. No. EJ1561. 1991). Procedure
Within 10 days from the flllng of the complaint or
; . Admissibility/Exclusionary Rule Information, the judge shall personally evaluate the
"Any evidence obtained In violation of the search and resolution of the prosecutor and its supporting evidence.
seizure clause, whether or no: it is also self-incriminating ' He may immediately dismiss the case if the evidence on
testimonial evidence, is inadmissible for any purpose in record clearly fails to establish probable cause. If he fihds
any proceeding." (Bernas, The 1987 Constitution of the proc.ible cause, he shall issue a warrant of arrest, or a
Republic of the Philippines, 2009). commitment order if the accused has already been
arrested pursuant to a warrant issued by the judge who
Buy-bust operations ~ conducted the preliminary investigation or when the
There was a failure of officers to comply with the IRR complaint or information was filed pursuant to section 7 of
regarding RA 9165 regarding the physical inventory and this Rule. In case of doubt on the existence of probable
photograph of seized items. Thus, the accused argue that cause, the judge may order the prosecutor to present
the evidence is inadmissible. It is still admissible provided · additional evidence witt,in five (5) days from notice and the
that' that the integrity and evidentlary value of the issue must be resolved by the court within thirty (30) days
evidence have been preserved. The apprehending from the filing of the complaint or information (ROC, Rule
officer marked the seized evidence in front of the appellant, 112, §6).
barangay captain and members of the buy bust team. It
was delivered to the investigator and subsequently sent to
the PNP Crime Laboratory for examination in the same
· Page 99 of 320
ATENEO CENTRAL
BAR OPERATIONS 2019 POLITICAL LAW
- ,-
ATENEO CENTRAL
BAR OPERATIONS 2019 POLITICAL LAW
themselves. (People v. Escordia/, G.R. Nos. 138934-35, case, the petitioner cannot invoke It for other persons.
2002). (Valmonte v. General De Vil:a, G.R. No. 83988, 1989).
...... ;
ATENEO CENTRAL
BAR OPERATIONS 2019 POLITICAL LAW
to the necessary and reasonable requirements of plice 4. To have the outline of his foot traced to determine its
power. identity with bloody tootprints: and
5. To be photographed or measured, or his garments or
'·
3. Students - Constitutional shoes removed or replaced, or to move his body to
It is within the prerogative of schools to require compliance .enable the foregoing things to be done. (People v.
with reasonable school regulations, as a condition for Gallarde, G.R. No. 133025, February 17, 2000}
admission or enrollment. The court found: ·
a. Schools and their administrators stand in loco parentis
with respect to their students; PRIVACY OF COMMUNICATIONS AND
b. Minor students have contextually fewer rights than an CORRESPONDENCE
adult, and are subject to the custody and supervision
of their parents, guardians, and schools; Concept
c. Schools, acting in loco parentls, have a duty to
• The privacy of communication .and correspondence
safeguard the health and well-being of their students
and may adopt such measures as may reasonably be shall be inviolable except upon lawful order of the court,
necessary to discharge such duty; and or when public safety or order requires otherwise as
d. Schools have the right to impose conditions on prescribed by law.
applicants for admission that are fair, just, and non- • Any evidence obtained in vi~lation of this or the
discriminatory. preceding section shall be inadmissible for any purpose
in any proceedir,gs. (Phil. Const., art. 3, § 3).
4. Persons charged before the public prosecutor's
• The privacy right is an aspect of the right to be secure in
office - Unconstitutional . ·
one's person.
Defendants in a criminal complaint are not randomly
picked; neither are they beyond suspicion. Certain persons
PRIVATE AND PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS
are singled out and are impleaded against their will,
Forms of communication considered private and protected
making a medical test a tool for criminal prosecution.
by this provision include letters, messages, telephone
(Social Justice Society v. Dangerous Drugs Board, G.R.
calls, telegrams and the like. (Bernas, The 1987 Philippine
Nos. 157870, 158633, 16165~ 2008).
_Constitution: A Comprehensive Reviewer, 59, 2011 ).
Evidence Obtained Through Purely Mechanical Acts
The constitutional right of an accused against self- Private communications can be made public
incrimination proscribes the use of physical or moral Private communications can be made public where a
secret involves public questions which the State should
compulsion to extort comrnuni« ations from the accused
and not the Inclusion of his body In evidence when it may
and ought to know, the State may infringe that privacy of .,
be material. Purely mechanical acts are not included in the communication by some process or by appealing to the
prohibition as the accused does not thereby speak his guilt, Court for the purpose of determining whether or not the ' ..
hence the assistance and guiding hand of counsel is not privacy should be maintained. The court may allow
required. The essence of the right against self~ Intrusions on privacy of communication and 1:. ·-~
incrimination is testimonial compulsion, that is, the giving correspondence only on the ground of probable cause.
of evidence against himself through a testimonial act. (Bernas, The 1987 Constitution of the Republlc of the
Philippines, 2009).
Hence, it has been held that:
INTRUSION, WHEN ALLOWED
1. A woman charged with adultery may be cornpeued to
submit to physical examination to determine her
It is allowed "upon 1awful order of the court, or when public
pregnancy: ..
safety or order requires otherwise as prescribed by law." :
-;
....
;,
2. An accused may be compelled to submit to physical
(Phil. Const., art. 3, § 3).
examination and to have a substance taken from his ( .
body for medical determination as to whether he was t ~·
General Rule: Intrusion requires court order.
suffering from gonorrhea which was contracted by his
Exception: When public safety or order requires it, the
victim;
executive may intrude into the privacy of an individual but
3. To expel morphine from his mouth;
only in accordance with an existing law allowing such
intrusion. (Bernas, The 1987 Constitution of the Republic effort to curb computer-related Identity theft violates the
of the Philippines, 2009). \ight to. privacy and correspondence as well as the right to
due process of law.
Requisites of an intrusion without an order
It should be based upon a governmeint official's However. Section 12 on real-time collection of traffic data
assessment that public safety and order demand such was declare::l unconstitutional for the authority that Section
intrusion, as provided by law. It is not only that the 12 gives law enforcement agencies is too sweeping and
discretion of the executive officer is !imitable by law but lacks restraint. While it says that traffic data collection
also that a public officer who exercises this power must be should not disclose identities or content data, such
able to point to a law under which he acts. (Bernas, The restraint is but an illusion. Admittedly, nothing can prevent
1987 Constitution of the Republic of the Philippines, 2009). law enforcement agencies holding these data in their
hands from looking into the identity of their sender or
Public order and safety receiver and what the data contains. This will
The security of human lives, liberty, and property against unnecessarily expose the citizenry to leaked information
the activities of invaders, insurrectionists, and rebels." or. worse, to extortion from certain bad elements in these
(1971 Constitutional Convention, Nov. 25, 1972). agencies. Section 12, of course, limits the collection of
traffic data to those "associated with specified
RA 10175 (CYBERCRIME LAWl communications." But this supposed limitation is no
limitation at all since, evidently, it is the law enforcement
Certain Cybercrime Offenses under RA 10175 were aqencies that would specify the target communications.
assailed for violating both the right against unreasonable The power is virtually limitless, enabling law enforcement
searches and seizures and the right to privacy. The court authorities to engage in "fishing expedition," choosing
held that relevant to any discussion of the right to privacy whatever specified communication they want. This
is the concept known as the "Zones of Privacy." Zones of evidently threatens the right of individuals to privacy.
privacy are recognized and protected in our laws. Within (Disini v. Sec. of Justice, G.R. No. 203335, 2014).
these zones, any form of intrusion is impermissible unless
excused by law and in accordance with customary legal The employee has a burden of proving that he has
process. The meticulous regard we accord to these zones legitimate expectation of privacy either in his office or
arises not only from our conviction that the right to privacy computer files. He can prove this by alleging and
is a "constitutional right" and "the right most valued by demonstrating the following: he used a password on his
. clvllized men," but also irom our adherence to the UDHR computer, did not share his office with co-workers and kept
which mandates that, "no one shall be subjected to the same locked. However, the existence of a workplace
arbitrary interference with his privacy" and "everyone has privacy policy may limit or erode the reasonable
the right to the protection of the law against such expectation of privacy. {Pollo v. Constantino-David, GR
(' ·.. interference or attacks." Thus, the two constitutional No. 181881, 2011)
guarantees create these zones of privacy:
.-... A. the right against unreasonable searches and seizures, Test of Reasonable Expectation Of Privacy
·- .
+ .,
which is the basis of the right to be let alone, and • Subjective: A person has exhibited an actual
B. the right to privacy of communication and expectation of privacy; and
correspondence. • Objective: The expectation be one that society
:l i
is prepared to recognize as reasonable (Pollo v.
t .' In assessing the challenge that the State has Constantino-David, supra)
impermissibly intruded into these zones of privacy, a court
must determine whether a person has exhibited a Before one can have an expectation of privacy in his or her
reasonable expectation of privacy and, if so, whether Online Social Network activity, it is first necessary that said
that expectation has been violated by unreasonable user manifest the intention to keep certain posts private. In
government intrusion. The usual identifying information the cyber world, utilization of privacy tools is the
regarding a person includes his name, his citizenship, his manifestation of the user's invocation of his or her right to
residence address, his contact number, his place and date informational privacy. (Vivares v. St. Theresa's College,
of birth, the name of his spouse, If any, his occupation, and G.R.No.20266~ 2014)
similar data. The law punishes those who acquire or use
such identifying inform~tion without right, implicitly to
cause damage. Petltioners failed to show how government
. ·~ .. Page 103 of 32C
.' '
ATENEO CENTRAL
BAR OPERATIONS 2019 POLITICAL LAW
That the photos are viewable by "friends only" does not secretly intercepting or recording private
necessarily bolster the petitioners' contention. In this communication. (Gaanan v, /AC, G.R. No. L-
regard, the cyber community is agreed that the digital 69809, 1986).
images under this setting still remain to be outside the
confines of the zones o! privacy in view of the following: EXCLUSIONARY RLILE
1. Facebook "allows the world to be more open and Any evidence obtained shall be inadmissible for any
connected by giving its users the tools to interact and purpose in any proceeding. However, in the absence of
share in any conceivable way"; governmental interference, the protection against
2. A good numher of Facebook users "befriend" other unreasonable search and seizure cannot be extended to
users who are total strangers; acts committed by private individuals.
3. The sheer number of "Friends" one user has,' usually
by the hundreds; and The constitutional proscription against unlawful searches
4. A user's Facebook friend can "share" the formers post, and seizures applies as a restraint directed only against
or "tag" others who are not Facebook friends with the government and its agencies tasked with the enforcement
former, despite its being visible only to his or her own of the law. Thus, It could only be invoked against the State
Facebook friends. to whom the restraint against arbitrary and unreasonable·
Setting a post's or profile detail's privacy to "Friends" is no exercise of power is Imposed. (People v. Marti, G.R. No.
assurance that it can no longer be viewed by another user 81561, 1991).
who is not Facebook friends with the source of the content.
(Vivares v. St. Theresa's College, G.R. No. 202666, 2014.) This does not mean however that private individuals
cannot be held liable. Almost all these liberties are also
R.A, 4200 (AtJTI-WIRETAPPING ACT) guaranteed by Article 32 of the C!vil Code, making private
violations actionable even if the violation does not have a
a. Only protects letters, messages, telephone calls, constitutional consequence such as the applicability of the
telegrams and the like. exclusionary rule. (Bernas, The 1987 Cons.titution of the
b. The substance of the conversation need not be Republic of the Philippines, 2009 ).
specifically alleged in the information.
c. Under Section 3 of R.A. 4200, a peace officer, who is Exclusionary rule will not apply if the recipient of the
authorized by a written order of the Court, may execute message granted access to the message(s) sent. (Office
any of the acts declared to be unlawful in the said law of the Court Administrator v. Judge Eliza 8. Yu, A.M. No.
in cases involving the crimes of: MTJ-12-1813, 2017)
1. Treason
2. Espionage WRIT OF HABEAS DATA
3. Provoking war and disloyalty in case of war A remedy available to any person whose right to privacy in
4. Piracy and mutiny in the high seas life, liberty or security is violated or threatened by an
5. Rebellion (conspiracy and proposal to commit; unlawful act or omission of a public official or employee, or
incltmg to commit) of a private individual or entity engaged in the gathering,
6. Sedition (conspiracy to commit and inciting to· collecting or storing of data or information regarding the
commit) person, family, home and correspondence of the aggrieved
7. Kidnc1pping party. (A.M. No 08-1-16-SC, Sec. 1).
8. Violations of C.A. No. 616 (punishing
i
... -~·
espionage and other offenses against national Who may file: (P-SCP-R)
security) 1. Person whcse right to Privacy is threatened
d. R.A. 4200 does not distinguish between a party to 2. In case of extrajudicial disappearance or killings: I.- '
the private communication or a third person. (a) Spouse, Children and Parents
Hence, both could be held liable under RA 4200 · (b) Any ascendant, descendant or collateral Relative of
if they commit any of the prohibited acts under RA the aggrieved party within the fourth civil degree of
4200. (Rnrnirez v. CA, G.R. No. 93833, 1995). consanguinity or affinity in default of those
e. The use of a telephone extension to overhear a mentioned in the preceding paragraph. (A.M. No '
" ~.
private conversation is not a vlotatlon of R.A. 4200 08-1-16-SC, Sec. 2). ' ;.,
Where to file: (RGP) independently from those provided under prevailing Rules.
1. Residence of petitioner or respondent, Writs of Amparo and habeas data will not issue to protect
2. Place wnere the data is Gathered or stored purely property or commercial concerns nor when the
3. In case of actions involving public data of government grounds invoked in support of the petitions therefor are
offices: · vague or doubtful. Employment constitutes a property right
(a) Supreme Court under the context of the due process clause of the
(b) Court of Appeals Constitution. It is evident that respondent's reservations on
(c) Sandiganbayan {A.M. No 08-1-16-SC, Sec. 3). the real reasons for her transfer - a legitimate concern
respecting the terms and conditions of one's employment
Contents of the petition: - are what prompted her to adopt the extraordinary remedy
1. The personal circumstances of the petitioner and the of habeas data. (Manila Electric Company v. Lim, G.R. No.
respondent; 184679, 2010}.
2. The manner the right to privacy is violated or
threatened and how it affects the right tc life, liberty or FREEDOM OF SPEECH AND EXPRESSION
security of the aggrieved party;
3. The actions and recourses taken by the petitioner to CON~EPT AND SCOPE
secure the data or information; No law shall be passed abridging the freedom of speech,
4. The location of the files registers or databases, the of expression, or of the press, or the right of the people
government office, and the person in charge, In peaceably to assemble and petition the government for
possession or i,1 control of the data or information, if redress of grievances. (Phil. Const., art. 3, § 4 ).
known;
5. The reliefs prayed for, which may include the updating, Freedom of Speech
rectification, suppression or destruction of the Formulated primarily for the protection of "core" speech,
database or information or files kept by the (i.e., speech, which communicates political, social, or
respondent. In case of threats, the relief may include a religious ideas). These enjoy the same degree of
prayer for an order enjoining the act complained of; protection. Commercial speech, however, does not.
and (Bernas, The 1987 Constitution of the Republic of the
6. Such other relevant reliefs as are just and equitable Philippines, 2009).
(A.M. No 08-1-16-SC, Sec. 6}.
Section 19 of the Cybercrime Prevention Act on Restricting
Court shall immediately order the Issuance of the writ or Blocking Access to Computer Data was assailed for
The Court shall immediately order the issuance of the writ violating freedom of speech. The court declared the
if on its face it ought to issue. The clerk of court shall issue provision unconsntutional and held that the content of the
the writ under the seal of the court and served within 3 days computer data can also constitute speech. In such a case,
,( . from its issuance. Section 19 operates as a restriction on the freedom of
expression over cyberspace. Certainly not all forms of
Cases of Urgt1nt Necessity speech are protected. Legislature may, within
i. ,J In case of urgent necessity, the justice or judge may issue constitutional bounds, declare certain kinds of expression
the writ under his or her own hand, and may deputize any as illegal. But for an executive cfficer to seize content
officer or person to serve it. {A.M. No 08-1-16-SC, Sec. alleged to be unprotected without any judicial warrant, it is
7). not enough for him to be of the opinion that such content
violates some law, for to do so would make him judge, jury,
Date and time for summary hearing - not be later than and executioner all rolled into one. Not only does Section
.. ;• 10 working days from the date of Its issuance. (A.M . 19 preclude any judicial i17tervention, but it also disregards
No 08-1-16-SC, Sec 7). jurisprudential guidelines established to determine the
validity of restrictions on speech. Section 19, however,
Rationale why Writ was conceived merely requires that the data to be blocked be found prima
' It bears reiteration that like the Writ of Amparo, habeas
' J facie in violation of any provision of the cybercrime law.
data was conceived as a response, given the lack of Taking Section 6 into consideration, this can actually be
,( .
effective and available remedies, to address the made to apply in relation to any penal provision. It does not
extraordinary rise in the number of killings and enforced
'
I .
•
.......; disappearances. Its intent is to address violations of or
take into consideration any of the three tests. (Disini v. Sec.
of Justice, G.R. No. 203335, 2014; See case for other
threats to the rights to life, liberty or security as a remedy
.! l Page 105 of 320
'- .•. :
<:»
ATENEO CENTRAL
BAR OPERATIONS 2019 POLITICAL LAW
censorship. (Near v. Minesota, 283 U.S. 697, June 1, publication about the number or location of its troops) ·Ji..•. L
1931; Bernas, The 1987 Constitution ofthe Republic of the , 2. Obscene publications
Philippines, 2009). 3. Security of community life may be protected against ..... ./
\ ...
ATENEO CENTRAL
BAR OPERATIONS 2019 POLITICAL LAW
Requisites for a Qualifiedly Privileged summary of the petition. (GMA Network v. Bustos, G.R.
Communication: (DAG) . No. 146848, 2006).
1. The person wno made the communication had a legal,
moral, or social Duty to make the communication, or indecency
at least, had an interest to protect, which interest may Not conforming with generally accepted standards of
either be his own or of the one to whom it is made; behavior or propriety.
2. The communication is Addressed to an officer or a
board, or superior, having some interest or duty in the Obscenity
matter, and who has the power to furnish the protection Appeals to lascivious thoJghts or desire or tends to
sought; arouse sexual desire.
3. The statements in the communication are rnade in Test for obscenity (Milter Test) codified in BP 880:
Good faitti and without malice. 1. Whether the average person, applying contemporary
community standards would find that the work, taken
Libel Against Public Officials and Public Figures as a whole, appeals to the prurient interest.
A public officlal cannot recover damages for a defamatory 2. Whether the work depicts or describes, in a patentiy
falsehood relating to his official conduct unless he proves offensive way, sexual conduct specifically defined by
that the statement was made with 'actual malice'. Actual the applicable state law.
malice means there was knowledge that it was false or with 3. Whether the work, taken as a whole Lacks Serious
reckless disregard of whether it was false or not. (NY Literary, Artistic, Political, or Scientific value (Code:
Times v. Sullivan, 376 U.S. 254, 1964). LSLAPS) (Miller v. California, 413 US. 15, 1973).
challenge is allowed for this reason alone, the State may overbreadth or vagueness of the statute. (Disini v.
be prevented from onacting laws against socially harmful Secretary of Justice, GR No. 203335, 2014)
'conduct.
TESTS
A plain reading of P.P. No. 1017 shows that it is not The freedom of expression and the right to freely associate
prima,ily directed at speech, rather, it covers a spectrum of are not absolute. The standards to test the validity of
conduct. It is a call upon the AFP to prevent or suppress regulations that curtail the freedom of speech, of the press,
all forms of lawless violence. Facial invalidation on the and of peaceful assembly are:
ground of overbreadth is a manifestly strong medicine, to
be used sparingly and only as a last resort. Petitioners did
not show that there is no instance wherein P .P. No. 1017 1. Dangerous tendency doctrine
may be valid (David v. Arroyo, G.R. No. 171396 2006). This is used for statements against the Supreme Court and
permits the application of restrictions when:
Facial Challenge . (a) There is a rational connecticn between the speech and
Prohibiting placing of campaign decals on private cars is , the danger apprehended;
overorcad, and thus invalid prohibition. (Adiong v. (b) The tendency of one to create the other is shown.
COMELEC, G.R. No. 103956, 1992). (Gonzales v. COMELEC, G.R. No. L-27833, 1969).
Banning the publishing of survey results is also overbroad Citizen Perez made this remark at a political discussion at
because It does not meet the O'Brien test, since it a town municipio: "and the Filipinos, like myself, must use
suppresses one type of expression while allowing others bolos for cutting off Wood's head for having recommended
like editorials. (SWS v. COMELEC, G.R. No. 147571, ·. a bad thing for tho Philippines." The court held that
2001). criticism, no matter how severe, on the Executive, the
Legislature, and the Judiciary, is within the range of liberty
A facial challenge is allowed against vague or overbroad of speech, unless the intention and effect be seditious. In
statutes because of possible ffchilling effect" upon this case, Malcolm found a seditious tendency which could
protected speech. The theory is that "[w]hen statutes easily produce disaffection among (he people and a state
regulate or proscribe speech and no readily apparent of feeling incompatible with a disposition to remain loyal to
construction suggests itself as a vehicle for rehabilitating the Government and obedient to the laws. (People v.
the statutes in a aingle prosecution, the transcendent value Perez, G.R. No. L-21049, 1923; Bernas, The 1987
to all society of constitutionally protected expression is Philippine Constitution: A Comprehensive Reviewer,
deemed to justify allowing attacks on overly broad statutes 2011 ).
with no requirement that the person making the attack
demonstrate that his own conduct could not be regulated If the words uttered create a dangerous tendency which
by a statute drawn with narrow specificity." This rationale the state has a right to prevent, then such words are
does not apply to penal statutes. (Estrada vs. punishable. it is not necessary that some definite or
Sandiganbayan, G.R. No. 148560, 2001 ). immediate acts of force, violence, or unlawfulness be
-:. ..:;;
advocated. It is sufficient that such acts he advocated in
The facial challenge has expanded its scope to cover general terms. Nor is it necessary that the language used
statutes not only regulating free speech, but also those be reasonably calculated to incite persons to acts of force,
involving religious freedom, and other fundamental rights violence or unlawfulness. It is sufficient if the natural
t .. ,,i
because of the expanded scope of judicial power. (lmbong tendency and probable effect of the utterance be to bring
v. Ochoa, GR No. 204819, 2014) . . about the substantive evil the utterance be to bring about
the substantive evil which the legislative body seeks to
In an "as applied" challenge, ,the constitutionality of a prevent (Cabansag v. Fernandez, G.R. No. L-8974, 1957).
statute can be chauenqed only by one who asserts a
violation of his own rights. It cannot be challenged based 2. Clear and present danger rulo
solely on the violation of the rights of third persons not This test Is used for statements against lower courts. The
before the court. An exception to this rule is the concept of question is whether the words are used in such { :.
facial challenge. A petitioner may mount a 'facial" circumstances and are of such a nature as to create a clear
challenge to the constitutionality of a statute even if he and present danger that they will bring about substantive
claims no violation of his own rights under the assailed evils :hat Congress has a right to prevent. It must be
i
(
.,,,.'
st.atute where it involves free speech on grounds of present and inevitable. It is a question of proximity and
Page 110 of 320
··.···
ATENEO CENTRAL
BAR OPERATIONS 2019 POLITICAL LAW
degree. Clear connotes a causal connection with the (Bernas, The 1987 Phflippine Constitution: A
danger of the substantive evil arising from the utterance Comprehensive Reviewer, 2011 ed. citing Gonzales v.
questioned. Present refers to the time element that is COMELEC, G.R. No. L-27833, 1969).
identified with imminent and immediate danger. (Gonzales
v. COMELEC, G.R. No. L-27833, 1969); The dangerous tendency rule and the clear and present
danger rule were evolved in the context of prosecution for
Radio station DYRE was summarily closed for national seditious speech. They are thus couched in terms of
security reasons because it allegedly aired subversive degree of ,=wil and proximity of the evil. But not all evils
programs. The SC held that all forms of media are entitled easily lend themselves, like sedition to measurement of
to the protection of the freedom of speech and expression proximity and degree. For legislation therefore whose
clause. The clear and present danger test may be applied object is not the prevention of evil measurable in terms of
to test the limits of free speech. That the words are used in proximity and degree, another test had to be evolved. The
such circumstances and are of such nature as to create a balancing of interests serves this purpose. It is used, for
clear and present danger that they will bring about the instance, for commercial speech. (People v. Perez, G.R.
substantive evils that Corqress has a right to prevent. The No. L-21049, 1923; Bernas, The 1987 Philippine
SC recognized that the government also has a right to be .Constitution: A Comprehensive Reviewer, 2011).
protected against broadcasts that incite the listeners to
violently overthrow it. . The SC held that the dangerous tendency doctrine and the
clear and present danger rule were fashioned in the course
However, the clear and present danger test is not an all- of testing legislation that l,imited speech expected to have
embracing interpretation that is applicable to all utterances deleterious consequences en the security and public order
i:i all forums. Freedom of television and radio broadcasting of the community. The clear and present danger rule is not
\ is lesser in scope than the freedom accorded to newspaper one of universal applicability and validity (Gonzales v.
[!
and print media. Radio broadcasting receives the most COMELEC, G.R. No. L-27833, 1969).
limited protection from the free expression clause.
Broadcast media have a uniquely pervasive preser.ce in Summary
the lives of all citizens - it reaches even the privacy of the
TEST CRITERION
home. Broadcast media is uniquely accessible to all, even
children - selectivity is more difficult in radio and TV. In 1. There should be a rational
.,..._:: other words, the aurliences of radio and TV have lesser connection between the speech
opportunity to cogitate, analyze, and reject the utterances.
l
, .. .
(Eastern Broadcasting v. Dans Jr., G.R. No. L· 59329, Dangerous
Tendency
and tne evil apprehended.
(Bernas, The 1987 Philippine
1985). .
Constitution: A Comprehensive
Reviewer, 2011).
3. Balancing of interest test 2~ Focus on content.
Represents a wholJy pragmatic approach .. .it rests on the
theory that it is the Court's function in the case before it 1. The words when used under such
when it finds public interests served by legislation on the circumstances are of such a
one hand and First Amendment freedoms affected by it on nature as to create a clear and
the other, to balance the one against the other and to arrive present danger that they will
at a judqrnent where the greater weight shall be placed. !f Clear and bring about the substantive evils
on balance, it appears that the public interest served by Present Danger that the state has a right to
restrictive legislation is of such .a character that it prevent (Bernas, The 1987
.... :.· outweighs the abridgement of freedom, the Court will find Philippine Constffution: A
the legislation valid. (Bernas, The 1987 Philippine Comprehensive Reviewer, 2011).
Constitution: A Comprehensive Review€r, 2011 ). 2. Focus on content & context.
Republic Act 4880 among other things prohibits the too 1. The courts should balance the
early nomination of politlcal candidates and limits the Balancing of public Interest served by
period for partisan political activity. Its purpose is to prevent , Interests legislation and the freedom of
the debasement of the political process. In determining the speech (or any other
constitutional right).
·..' ; validity of the law, free speech as a social value must be
weighed against the political process as a social value.
Page 111 of 32.0
'-, -1'.
-------------·· ---·----- ·--- -- ·-· ··----
A TENEO CENTRAL
BAR OPERATIONS 2019 POLITICAL LAW
FREEDOM OF RELIGION
Rule on Assembly in Private Places -
Only the consent of the owner of the property or person No law shall be made respecting an establishment of
entitied to possession thereof is required. religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof. The free
exercise and enjoyment of religious profession and
B.P. 880 or the Pub I le Assembly Act of 1985 worship, without discrimination or preference, shall forever
Sets forth the requirements and procedure which· are be ailowed. No religious test shall be required tor the
necessary to regulate the time, place and manner of public exercise of civil or political rights. (Phil. Const., art. 3, § 5).
assemblies. It is a content-neutral legislation. It refers to all ·
kinds of public assemblies that would use public places. Freedom of Religion includes:
The reference to "lawful cause" does not make it content- 1. Non-establishment clause
based because assemblies really have to be for lawful . 2. Free exercise clause
causes; otherwise they would not be "peaceable" and
entitled to protection. Non-Establishment ctause and Frfie Exercise Clause
may be required for the exercise of such right in any public tablish an official religion tile legislation as it
park or plaza of a city or municipality until that city or hether those laws operate operates against
municipality shall have established or designated such irectly to coerce non- him in the practice
freedom parks. For without such alternative forum, to deny servlnq individuals or not. of his religion.
the permit would in effect be to deny the right. Advance
notices should, however, be given to the authorities to 2. While the
ensure proper coordination and orderly proceeding. non-estabtishment
clause is absolute,
The use of the term CPR should be discontinued, since it the moment such
does not mean anylhing other than the maximum tolerance belief flows over
policy set forth in B.P. 880. (Bayan v. Ermita, G.R. No. into action, it
169838, 2006). becomes subject to
' ,.
government ;
v.
A TENEO CENTRAL
BAR OPERATIONS 2019
POLITICAL LAW
hands of numerous private citizens who are free to direct Pornillos, G.R. No. 113092, 1994). ~.;
the aid elsewhere. (Mitchell v. Helms, 530 US 793, 2000)
~.
The government cannot certify food as halal - only the However, the RH law violates the guarantee of religious
religion can do this. (Islamic Da'wah Council of the freedom by compelling medical health practitioners,
Philippines, Inc. v. Office of tho Secretary, G.R. No. hospitals, and health care providers, under pain of penalty,
153888, 2003). to refer patients to other institutions despite their
conscientious objections.
The non-establishment clause calls for government
neutrality in all religious matters and governmental reliance The Court is of the view that the obligation to refer imposed
on religious justification is prohibited. Recognizing the by the RH Law violates the religious belief and conviction
religious nature of the Filipinos and the elevating influence of a conscientious objector. Once the medical practitioner,
of religion in society, the Philippine Constitution's religion against his will, refers a patient seeking information on
clauses prescribe a benevolent neutrality and not a strict modern reproductive health products, services,
one. Benevolent neutrality recognizes that the government procedures and methods, his conscience is immediately
must pursue its secular goals and interests, but at the burdened as he has been compelled to perform an act
same time, strive to uphold religious liberty to the greatest against his beliefs. As Commissioner Joaquin· A. Bernas
extent possible within flexible constitutiona! limits. Law- has written, "at the basis of the free exercise clause is the
based morality is secular, but benevolent neutrality could respect for the inviolability of the human conscience."
allow for accommodation of religion-based morality, (lmbong v. Ochoa, G.R. No. 204819, 2014).
provided that doing so would not offend compelling state
interests. (Ang ladlad v. COMElEC, G.R. No. 190582, The Supreme Court denied the motion to lift the TRO and
2010). . upheld the TRO it previously issued in June 2015 which
barred the Department of Health (DOH) from acquiring and
State-sponsored distribution of contraceptives distributing contraceptive products lmplanon and lmplanon
under the RH law does not violate the guarantee. of NXT and ordered the FDA to determine whether the
religious freedom. aforementioned drugs are safe and non-abortifacients.
(Alliance for the Family Foundation, Philippines, Inc.
Matters dealing with "faith, practice, doctrine, form of "(ALFI), et al. v. Hon. Janette L. Garin, et al., G.R. No.
worship, ecclesiastical law, custom and rule of a church ... 217872, 2016)
are unquestionably ecclesiastical matters which are
outside the province of the civil courts." The jurisdiction of TESTS
the Court extends only to public and secular morality. 1. Clear and Present Danger Test
Stated otherwise. while the Court stands without authorny TI1e only justification for a. restraint or limitation upon
to rule on ecclesiastical matters, as vanguard of the religious freedom is the presence of a clear and present
Constitution, it does have authority to determine whether danger of a substantive evil to public safety, peace, or
the RH law contravenes the guarantee of religious order. The State has a right to prevent and punish activities
.......
t: .:.
freedom . that would incite violence and breach the peace in order to
protect others of their equal right to exercise their liberties.
While the Constitution prohibits abortion. laws were (Cantwell v. Connecticut 310 U.S. 296, 1940; also
enacted allowing the use of contraceptives. To some discussed in Ebralinag v. Superintendent, G.R. No. 95770,
medical practitioners, however, the whole Idea of using 1993).
contraceptives is an anathema. Consistent with the
principle of benevolent neutrality, their beliefs should be 2. Benevolent Neutrality - Com::,elling State Interest
respected, · · Test
Government actions that substantially burden a religious
-~- _.: In the same breath that the establishment clause restricts practice must be justified by a compelling governmental
what the government can do with religion, it also limits what interest. (Employment Division v. Smith, 494 U.S. 872,
;;.. ..:, religious sects can or cannot do with the government. They 1990).
can neither cause the governnient to adopt their particular
doctrines as policy for everyone, nor can they not cause Using the compelling state Interest test from a
the government to restrict other groups. To do so, in simple benevolent neutrality stance
terms, would cause the State to adhere to a particular The state has the burden to justify any possible sanction.
religion and, thus, esteblishlnq a state religion. This step involves three steps: (SPL)
~-J
ATENEO CENTRAL
BAR OPERATIONS2019 POLITICAL LAW
1. The courts should look into the Sincerity of the 3. Conscientious Objector Test
religious belief wit:,out inquiring into the truth of the A person who for moral or religious reasons is opposed to
belief participating in any war, and who may be excused from
2. The State has to establish that its fy_rposes are military consc:riptlon but remains subject to service in civil
legitimate and compelling work for the nation's health, safety or interest. (Black's Law
3. The State used the Least intrusive means possible Dictionary, 9th ed).
In the above circumstances, the State undertakes the Escritor was the court interpreter at the RTC of Las Pinas.
burden of presenting evidence of its compelling interest to A complaint for disgrnceful and immoral conduct under the
override respondent's religious belief. Further, the State Revised Administrative Code was filed against Escritor
has to show that the means it has adopted in pursuing the because of living with a man not her husband. As a
said interest is the least restrictive to respondent's defense, she asserted that this conjugal arrangement was
freedom. (Estrada v. Escrltor, A.M. No. P-02-1651, 2003). in conformity with her religious congregation which was the
Jehovah's witnesses. In discussing the Free Exercise
The free exercise of religion enloys a preferred position in Clause, the court tackled United States v. Seeger, which
the hierarchy oi rights. The State's broad interest in involved four men who claimed "conscientious objector"
protecting the institutions of marriage and the family is not status in refusing to serve in the Vietnam War. One cf the
a compelling Interest enforcing the concubinage charges. four, Seeger, was not a rr.ember of any organized religion
(Estrada v. Escritor, A.M. No. P-02-1651, 2003). · opposed to war, but when specifically asked about his
belief in a Supreme Being, Seeger stated that "you could
The free exercise clause does not relieve one of the call (it) a belief in a Supreme Being or God. These just do
obligation to comply with a law that incidentally forbids {or not happen to be the words that I use." . Forest Peter,
requires) the performance of an act that his religious belief another one of the four claimed that after considerable
requires (or forbids}: meditation and reflection "on values derived from the
A. If the law is not specifically directed to reli~ious Western religious and philosophical tradition," he
prac:tlce determined that it would be "a violation of his moral code
B. If the law is constitutional as applied to those who , to take human life and that he considered this belief
engage in the specified act for non-religious purposes superior to any obligation to the state." The Court avoided
a constitutional question by broadly interpreting not the
If the law is not specifically directed to religious practice Free Exercise Clause, but the statutory definition of religion
. and is applied equally to all, regardless of whether they do in the Universal Military Training and Service Act of 1940
the act for religious or non-religious purposes, it does not which exempt from combat anyone "who, by reason of
offend the free exercise clause. The balancing of interests religious training and belief, is conscientiously opposed to
test, whereby government actions that substantially participation in war in any form." (Estrada v. Escritor A.M.
burden a religious practice must be justified by a No. P-02-1651, 2.006. See also Gerena v. Secretary of
... ,.;;;·
',
compelling governmental Interest, is inapplicable to an Education, G.R. No. L-13954, 1959).
across-the-board criminal prohibition of a particular form of
conduct. Otherwise, this would create an extraordinary Conscientious Objection to Military Service
right to Ignore general laws in the name of religion for as As seen in U.S. v. Seeger, supra, it may also be used as a
long as no compelling St::ite interest intervenes. ground for exemption from compulsory military service. It
(Employment Division v. Smith, 494 U.S. 872, 1990). also Includes those with a sincere and meaningful belief
which occupies in the life of its possessor a place parallel
The US SC held that under the free exercise clause, a law to that filled by the God of those admittedly qualifying for
that burdens religious practice need not be justified by a the exemption.
compelling governmental interest, if it is a) neutral and b) . ~
of general applicability. However, when the law is not Other Doctrines t. .r:
neutral or not of ge;,eral application, the same must To allow the Muslim employees in the Judiciary to be
undergo the most riqorous of scrutiny: 1) It must be justified excused from work from 10:00 a.m. to 2:00 p.m. every
by a compelling governmental interest 2) It must be Friday during the entire calendar year would mean a :=. :..
narrowly tailored to advance the said interest (Church of diminution of the prescribed government working hours.
The Lukumi Babalu Aye, Inc., et al. v, City Of Hialeah, 508 The performance of religious practices should not
U.S. 520, 1993). prejudice the court and the public. The remedy of the ... J.
excused from work is legislative. (Re: Request of Muslim LIBERTY OF ABODE AND
Employees in Different Courts in lligan City (Re: Office FREEDOM OF MOVEMENT
Hours) AM. No. 02-2-10-SC, 2005).
The liberty of abode and of changing the same within the
Where the complete separation of civil and ecclesiastical limits prescribed by law shall not be impaired except upon
authority is insisted upon, the civil courts must not unduly lawful order of the court. Neither shall the right to travel be
intrude in matters of · an ecclesiastical nature .. The impaired except in the interest of national security, public
excommunication of members of a religious organization is safety or public health, as, may be provided by law. (1987
a matter best left to the discretion of the officials, laws, and Const, art. 3, §6)
canons of the said organization. It is not for the courts to
exercise control over Church authorities in the LIMITATIONS
performance of their discretionary and official functions. In
CONDITIONS FOR VALID
disputes · involving religious institutions, one area that RIGHT
CURTAILMENT
courts should not touch is doctrinal and disciplinary
differences. The power of excluding from the church those Liberty of• Lawful order of the court; and
allegedly unworthy of membership is unquestionably an abode • Within the limits prescribed by law.
ecclesiastical matter that is outside the province of civil
courts. (Taruc v, Bishop, G.R. No. 144801, 2005). • Lawful order of the court; or
Right to • May only be done on the basis of the
interest of national security, public
A case involving a minister who failed to account fo, funds travel
safety, or public health
and was dismissed is not an ecclesiastloal affair since it did
• Must be provided by law.
not involve doctrines or religious teachings. (Austria v. -
NLRC, G.R. No. 124382, 1999).
Rights Guaranteed
Other Constitutional Provisions Expressing Non- 1. Freedom to choose ar.d change one's place of abode
Establishment 2. Freedom to travel within the country and outside ·.
1. Art VI, Sec 29 - no public money or property given to
religious sect, minister or religious personnel (except· . The UDHR and ICCPR treat the right to freedom of
for those assigned to Army, penal institution, movement and abode within the territory of a state,- the
government orphanage or leprosarium) right to leave a country, and the right to enter one's country
2. Art 11, Sec 6 - Separation of church and State is as separate and distinct rights. The Declaration speaks of
inviolable the "right to freedom of movement and residence within the
3. Art IX-C, Sec 2(5) - No religious sects can be borders of each state". It would therefore be inappropriate
·~. :· registered as political parties · to construe the limitations to the right to return to one's
country in the same context as those i::,ertainir,g to the
' ..,,.••
i.:
.... J Constitutional Exceptions to · Non-Establishment liberty of abode and the right to travel. (Marcos v.
Clause · Manglapus, G.R. No. 88211, 1989).
1. Art VI, Sec. 28(3) - charitable institutions, churches,
etc., and all lands, btJildings, improvements actually, The Mayor of a rr.unlcipality does not have the right to force
x; ..·' directly and exclusively used for religious, charitable, citizens of the Phlllppines to change their domicile from
or educational purposes exempt from taxation one locality to another, even if they are considered women
2. Art VI, Sec. 1(2) - Cited above: the Armed Forces, of "ill repute." (Villavicencio v. Lukban, G.R. No. L- 14639,
penal institution, government orphanage or 1919).
leprosarium
3. Art XIV, Sec 3(3) -At the option in writing of parents RIGHT TO TRAVEL
or guardians, religion can be taught in public (a) Watch-Lists and Hold Departure Orders
elementary and HS within regular class hours A person facing criminal charges may be restrained by the
4. Art XIV, Sec 4(2) - usually there is citizenship Court from leaving too country or, if abroad, compelled to
requirement for ownership of educational institutions return. Article 111, Section 6 of the 1987 Constitution should
.~· ·'
(30%), but not for those established by religious be interpreted to mean that while the llberty of travel may
---· groups and mission boards be impaired even without Court Order. the appropriate
·-, )
executive officers or administrative authorities ore not
armed with arbitrary discretion to impose limitations. They
" ....· Page 119 of 320
-- ~- . . - --- .... -. ---
ATENEO CENTRAL
BAR OPERATIONS 2019
POLITICAL LAW
can impose limits only on the basis of "national security, RIGHT TO INFORMATION
public safety, or public health" and "as may be provided by
law." a limiting phrase which did not appear in the 1973 The right of the people to information on matters of public
text. Article 111, Section 6 of the 1987 Constitution should concern shall be recognized. (Phil. Const., art. 3, § 7).
by no means be construed as delimiting the inherent power
of the Courts to use all means necessary to carry their LIMITATIONS
orders into effect in criminal cases pending before them.
When by law jurisdiction is conferred on a Court or judicial Rights Guaranteed
officer, all auxillary writs, process and other means 1. Right to information on matters of public concern
necessary to carry it into effect may be employed by such 2. Right of access to official records and documents
Court or officer. Petitioner is facing a criminal charge. He
has posted bail but has violated the conditions thereof by The people have the right to information on matters of
failing to appear before the Court when required. Wai':ants public concern, and access to official records shall be
for his arrest have been issued. Those orders and allowed to citizens as may be provided by law. It is a self-
processes would be rendered nugatory if an accused were -, executing provision. The :ight to information is a public
to be allowed to leave or to remain, at his pleasure, outside right - and every citizen is entitled thereto. Civil service
the territorial confines of the country. Holding an accused eligibility is a matter of public concern; there is nothing
in a criminal case within the reach of the Courts by secret about it. (Legaspi v. CSC, G.R. No. L-72119, 1987).
preventing his departure from the Philippines must be
considered as a valid restriction on his right to travel so that Although citizens are afforded the right to information and,
he may be dealt with in accordance with law. The offended pursuant thereto, are entitled to "access to official records,"
party in any criminal proceeding is the People of the the Constitution does not accord them a right to compel
Philippines. It is to their best interest that crirninat custodians of official records to prepare lists, abstracts,
prosecutions should run their course and proceed to finality summaries and the like in their desire to acquire
without undue de'ay, with an accused holding himself information on matters of pubhc concern. Only access to
amenable at all times to Court Orders and processes. the records is permitted. Otherwise, they would unduly
(Silverio v. CA, G.R. No. 94284, 1991). burden the agencies with the preparation of their requested
lists or summaries. (Valmonte v. Belmonte, G.R. · No.
Department Circular Mo. 41 was bereft of legal basis 74930, 1989).
because of the absence of a law authorizing the Secretary .
of Justice to issue Hold Departure Orders (HOO), Watch Limitations
List Orders (WLO), or Allow Departure Order (ADO). The The government has discretion with respect to the
issuance of DOJ Circular No. 41, without a law to justify its authority to determir.e what matters are of public concern .· ,.
action, is an unauthorized act of the DOJ of empowering and the authority to determine the manner of access to ' ,
In every case. the availability of access to a particular The COMELEC may not deny a request to disclose the
public record must be circumscribed by the nature of the names of the nominees of participating party-lists in an
information sought, i.e., election. The COMELEC may not show the names of the
(a) Being cf public concern or one that involves public nominees in the "Certified List." However, nothing in RA
interest. and, 7941 prohibits the COMELEC from disclosing or even
(b) Not being exempted by law from the operation of the [)Ublishing through mediums other than the "Certified List."
. constitutional guarantee. The identity of candidates for an elective office is a matter
of public interest. (Bantay Republic Act or BA-RA 7941 v.
The threshold question ts, therefore, whether or not the COMELEC, G.R. No. 177271, 2007).
information sought is of public interest or public I
concern. In determining whether or not a particular It is always necessary, given the highly important and
information is of public concern there is no rigid test which complex powers to fix tariff rates vested in the president,
can be applied. "Public concern" like "public interest" is a that recommendations submitted for the President's
term that eludes exact definition. Both terms embrace a consideration be well-thought out and well-deliberated.
broad spectrum of subjects which the public may want to The Court has expressly recognized in Chavez v. Public
know, either because these directly affect their lives, or Estates Authority that "a frank exchange of exploratory
simply because such matters naturally arouse the interest ideas and assessments, free from the glare of publicity and
of an ordinary citizen. In the final analysis, it is for the courts pressure by interested parties, is essential to protect the
to d.etermine on a case by case basis whether the matter independence of decision-making of those tasked to
at issue is of interest or importance, as it relates to or exercise Presidential, Legislative and Judicial power."
affects the public. (Legaspi v. CSC, G.R. No. L-72119,
1987). In Almonte v.. Vasquez the Court has stressed the need for
confidentiality and privacy, stating thusly: "A President and
Exceptions (BENT DISC) those who assist him must be free to explore alternatives
1. Banking transactions in the process of shaping policies and making decisions
1".... -..· 2. Executive Sessions and to do so in a way many would be unwilling to express
3. National Security matters except privately." Without doubt, therefore, ensuring and
4. Trade secrets promoting the free exchange of ideas among the members
5. Diplomatic correspondence of the committee tasked to give tariff recommendations to
,....,..
'·
6. Intelligence information . the President were truly imperative. (Sereno v. Committee
7. Suprem3 Court deliberations on Trade and Related Matters of the National Economic
8. Closed Door cabinet meetings and Development Authority, G.R. No. 175210, 2016).
There are certain classes of information which may be It is the general policy of the State to adopt full public
withheld from the public and even from Congress. These disdosure of all transactions involving matters of public
1
,· ...- J..
.::.:.,.,..,~ are national security matters or confidential diplomatic interest. The very existence of the MTRCB is public in
matters, trade secrets and banking transactions, the nature - thus, there can be no valid claim to privacy. The
identity of informants in criminal investigations, confidential decisions of the board are made in the exercise of public
or classified matters which come to the knowledge of functions; hence they assume a public character. The right
public officials by reason of their office. (Chavez v. PCG~. " to privacy belongs to the individual acting in his private
G.R. No 130716, 1998). capacity and not to· a governmental agency or officers
tasked with, and acting in, the discharge of public duties.
As a matter of public right, access to information or official
. .., Page 121 of 320
---····---------------------
A TENEO CENTRAL
BAR OPERATIONS 2019 POLITICAL LAW
records cannot tie made dependent upon the discreti on of invoke the privilege, there must be a showing that the
the agency involved, unless the law itsetf provides document is both predeclsional and deliberative. Court
otherwise. (Aquino-Sarmiento v. Morato, G.R. No. 92541,, records which can be shown to possess both these
1991). qualities cannot be the subject of subpoena. (In Re:
Production of Court Records and Documents and the
PUBLICATION OF LAWS AND REGULATIONS Attendance of Court officials and employees as witnesses
under the subpoenas of Feb 10,2012 and the various
The very first clause of Section I of Commonwealth Act 638 letters for the Impeachment Prosecution Panel dated Jan
reads: "There shall be published in the Official Gazette ... • 19 ar.d 25, 2012, 2012).
The word "shall" used therein imposes upon respondent
officials an imperative duty. That duty must be enforced if A. Predecislonal - refers to communications made in the
the Constitutional right of the people lo be informed on attempt to reach a final conclusion
matters of public concern is to be given substance and · B. Deliberative - refers to information whose disclosure
reality. The law itself makes a list of what should be would discourage candid discussion within the agency
published in the Official Gazette. It Is needless to add that
the publication of presidential issuances "of a public Presidential Cornmunicatlons Privilege
nature" or "of general applicability" is a requirement of due Applies to decision-making of the President; rooted in the
process. constitutional prindple of separation of power and the
President's unique constitutional role; applies to
It is a rule of law that before a person may be bound by documents in their entirety, and covers final and post-
law, he must first be officially and specifically informed of decisional materials as well as pre-deliberative ones;
its contents. Publication is necessary to apprise the public meant to encompass only those functions that form the
of the contents of [penal] regulations and make the said core of presidential authority.
penalties binding on the persons affectedthereby. (Tanada
v. Tuvera, G.R. No. L-63915, 1985). Requisites:
1. The communications relate to a "quintessential and
ACCESS TO COURT RECORDS non-delegable power" of the President
Pleadings and other documents filed by the parties are not 2. The communications are "received" by a close advisor
matters of public concern or interest. Access to court of the President.
records may be permitted at the discretion and subject to 3. There is no adequate showing of a compelling need
the supervisory and protective powers of the court. Only that would justify the limitation of the privilege and cf
those who are "interested persons" who have a legitimate the unavailability of the information elsewhere by an
reason for accessing the recorc s may ask the courts to appropriate investigating authority. (Neri v. Senate
access pleadings. (Hilado v. Judge Reyes, G.R. No. Committee, G.R. No. 180643 2008).
163155, 2006). ,· ~
'
RIGHT TO INFORMATION RELATIVE TO:
Limitation on access to court records coverts other matters (a) Government contract negotiations
in connection with the transaction of any official business {See: Chavez v. PCGG under Right to Information)
by the court, and includes all evidence it has received in a
case. In determining whether a particular information is of (b) D!plomatic neqotiatlons • It is clear that while the final
public concern. there is no right test. In the final analysis, text of the JPEPA may not be kept perpetually confidential
it is for the courts to determine on a case to case basis - since there should be "ample opportunity for discussion
whether the matter at issue is of interest or importance as before a treaty is approved" - the offers axchanged by the
it relates to or affect the public. (Hilado v. Judge Reyes, parties during the negotiations continue to be privileged
G.R. No. 163155, 2006). even after the JPl:PA is published. It is reasonable to
conclude that the Japanese representatives submitted
Court deliberations are traditionally recognized as their offers with the understanding that "historic
privileged s.ommunicatlons (deliberative process confidentiality" would govern the same. Disclosing these
privilege). This privilege may be Invoked by judges and offers could impair the ability of the Philippines to deal not
also by court officials and employees who are privy to only with Japan but with other foreign governments in
these deliberations. It is understood that the rule extends future negotiations. (Akbayan v. Aquino, G.R. No. 170516,
to documents and other communications which are part of 2008).
or are related to the deliberative process, However, to
Page 122 of 320
ATENEO CENTRAL
BAR OPERATIONS 2019 POLITICAL LAW
The power of eminent domain is not an unlimited power. power of eminent domain. (Jesus is Lord School v.
Section 9, Article Ill of the 1987 Constitution sets down the Municipality of Paslg, G.R. No. 152230, 1974).
essential limitations upon this inherent right of the State to
take private property, namely: (a) that the taking must be Heirs of JBL Reyes filed a case for unlawful detainer
for a public purpose: and (b) that just compensation must against Abiog & Maglonso; they obtained a writ of
be paid to the owner. The State must first establish that the execution. However, during the pendency of the case, the
exercise of eminent domain is for a public purpose, which, City of Manila sought to expropriate the same properties.
here, is already settled. What remains to be determined is The CA issued protective orders, requiring the parties to
the just compensation. (EPZA v. Estate of Salud Jimenez, maintain the status quo untll the expropriation is resolved.
G.R. No. 188995, 2011). The heirs question the legality and validity of the
expropriation. The Local Government Code and the
The owner is entitled to legal interest from the time of the Charter of the City of Manila empower the same to
taking of the property until the actual payment in order to expropriate private property for its urban land reform and
place the owner in a position as good as, but not better -, housing program; however, there are other laws to be
than, the position he was in before the taking occurred. complied with. RA No. 7279 (Urban Development &
(EPZA v. Estate of Salud Jimenez, G.R. No. 188995, Hou~,ing Act) lays down the mandatory priority in the
2011). acquisition of lands:
1. Those owned by the government
Who May Exercise (CELPQ) 2. Alienable lands of the publlc domain
1. Congress 3. Unregistered, idle, or abandoned lands
2. Executive, pursuant to legislation enacted by 4. Those within declared Areas of Prior:ty Development,
Congress Zonal Improvement, Slum Improvement, or
3. Local government units, pursuant to an ordinance Resettlement Program sites Bagong Lipunan
enacted by their respective leglslativP-bodies (under lmpro·,ement Sites and Services (BLISS) w/c have not
LGC) been acquired
4. Public corporations, as may be delegated by law 5. Privately owned lands (last in the priority)
5. Quasi-public corporations e.g .. PNR, PLOT,
Meralco. Further, the same Act provides that expropriation is to be
resorted to only when other modes of acquisition
The delegated power of eminent domain of local (community mortgage, land swappinp, land assembly or
government is strictly speaking not a power or eminent but consolidation, land banking, donation, joint venture,
of inferior domain--a share merely in eminent domain. negotiated purchase) have already been exhausted. The
Hence, it is only as broad as the authority delegated to it. City of Manila failed to comply with any of the aforesaid
(Bernas, The 1987 Philippine Constitution: A requirements. The exercise of eminent domain cannot
Comprehensive Reviewer, 2011). override the guarantees of due process conferred upon the
property owners. (Heirs of JBL Reyes v. City of Manila,
The exercise of the right of eminent domain, whether G.R. Nos. 132431 & 137146, 2004).
directly by the State or by its authorized agents, is
necessarily in derogation of private rights. It is one of the. Requisites: (TaPuCom)
.•·.·..,;.,I~· harshest proceedings known to the law. Consequently, 1. There is a I1!l!.i!lil. of orivate property
when the sovereign delegates the power to a political unit 2. Taking is for Public use
or agency, a strict construction will be given against the 3. Payment of just Compensation
agency asserting the power. The authority to condemn is
~.;) to be strictly construed in favor of the owner and against Requisites before an LQU can exercise the power of
the condemnor. When the power is granted, the extent to eminent domain (OPJO):
which it may be exercised is limited to the express terms 1. An ordinance is enacted by the local legislative
or clear implication of the statute in which the grant is council authorizing the local chief executive, in behalf
contained. Corollarily, the respondent, which is the of the LGU, to exercise the power of eminent domain
condemnor, has the burden of proving all the essentials or pursue expropriation proceedings over a particular
·-~·
•• ·!
necessary to show the right of condemnation. It has the private property .
burden of proof to establish that it has complied with all the 2. The power of eminent domain is exercised for
{ : requirements provided by law for the valid exercise of the public use, purpose or welfare, or for the benefit
'-..,;
. '
ATENEO CENTRAL
BAR OPERATIONS 2019 POLITICAL LAW
3. There is payment of just compensation, as required The c;onstruction of floodwalls causes the deprivation and
under Section 9, Article Ill of the Constitution, and dispossession of the property. True, no burden was
other pertinent laws. imposed, and title still belonged to the owner. But the
4. A valid and definite offer has been previously made to nature and eHect of floodwalls would deprive the owner of.
the owner of the property sought to be the normal use of the remaining areas. It would prevent
expropriated, but said offer was not accepted. ingress and egress to the property. (Republic v. Andaya,
G.R. No.160656, 2007). .
There Is Taking of Private Property
The power of eminent domain n'ust be distinguished from In totally prohibiting respondents from collecting parking
police power. When the State exercises "police power," fees from the public for the use of the mall pal"king facilities,
property is merely "regulated." There is no transfer of the State would be acting beyond the bounds of police
ownership. By eminent domain, property Is "taken." There power. [Thus. in this case, there was "taking" on the part of
is transfer of ownership. "Regulotion" is not compensable the State.) (Office of the Solicitor General vs. Ayala Land,
but "taking" must be compensated. (Bernas, The 1987 Incorporated, G.R. No. 177056, 2009).
Philippine Constitution: A Comprehensive Reviewer,
2011 ). There is "taking" when the expropriator enters private
property not only for a momentary period but for a more
The power to regulate does not include the power to permanent duration, or for the purpose of devoting the
prohibit or confiscate. It does not include the power to take property to a public use in such a manner as to oust the
private property for public use. If property is to be taken owner and deprive him of all beneficial enjoyment thereof.
under the authority of the police power, it must be for the In this context, there was taking when the MIAA occupied
purpose of being destroyed for the protection of the public , a portion thereof for its expanded runway. (MIAA v.
welfare. (City Government of QC v. Judge Ericta. G.R. No. Rodriguez, G.R. No. 16183, 2006).
L-34915, 1983).
There was a 'ull taking on the part of NPC, notwithstanding
Elements of Taking (BEAPP) that the owners were not completely and actually
1. Utilization of the property must be in such a way as to dispossessed. It is settled that the taking of private
oust the owner and deprive him of the Beneficial property for public use, to be compensable, need not be an
enjoyment of his property. actual physical taking or appropriation. NPC constructed a
2. The expropriator Enters the property tunnel underneath the land of the Heirs of Macabangkit
3. Entry is made under warrant or color of legal Authority without going through formal expropriation proceedings
4. Property is devoted to Public use and without procuring their consent or at least informing
5. The entrance must be Permanent (Republic v. Vda. de them beforehand of the construction. NPC's construction . •,
{ ;
Castellvi, G.R. No. L-20620, 1974). adversely affected the owners' rights and interests
because the subterranean intervention by NPC prevented ,·-...
While the power of erninent domain often results in the them from introducing any developments on the surface,
t . ,.':i
taking of properly, "taking" may include trespass w:·:hout and from disposing of the land or any portion of it, either by
actual eviction of the owner, material impairment of the sale or rnortqaqe, (NAPOCOR v. Heirs of Macabangkit
value of the property or prevention of the ordinary uses for , Sangkay, G.R. No. 165828, 2011). ,'
which the property was intended such as the establishment
of an easement. A regulation which substantially deprives Compensable takin~1 includes destruction, restriction,
the owner of his proprietary rights and restricts the diminution, or interruption of the rights of ownership or of
beneficial use and enjoyment for public use amounts to the commcn and necessary use and enjoyment of the
compensable taking. (Didipio Earth Savers et ai. v. property in a lawful manner, lessening or destroying its
Secretary, G.R. No. 157882, 2006). . value. It is neither necessary that the owner be wholly
deprived of the use of his property, nor material whether '='.... ,
An ordinance which permanently restricts the use of the property is removed from the possession of the owner,
property such that it can no longer be used for any or in any respect changes hands. (NAPOCOR v. Heirs of
reasonable purpose is beyond regulation and constitutes ·
taking of property. (People v. Fajardo, G.R. No. L-12172,
Mabangkit Sangkay, G.R. No. ·165828, 2011).
'v -~-
1958).
.- . ... ;/
2007) . an unconditional purchase and sale, contract freely entered
Page 127 of 320
...
. ;
···---- ·-· .. - --- - .. -. ---------··--- . : . - ·-
ATENEO CENTRAL
BAR OPERATIONS 2019 POLITICAL LAW
by two parties. on;;m1out obliqafion to buy and the other location, and the tax declarations thereon. The measure is
without the duty to sell. In that case, the fee simple concept not the taker's gain but the owner's loss. To be just, the
really comes into play. There is really no occasion to apply compensation must be fair not only to the owner but also
the "fee simple concept" if the transfer is conditional. to the taker.
The taking of a private land in expropriation proceedings is To determine just compensation, the trial court should first
always conditioned on its continued devotion to its public ascertain the market value of the property, to which should
purpose. As a necessary corollary, once the purpose is be added the consequential damages after deducting
terminated or peremptorily abandoned, then the therefrom the consequential benefits which may arise from
former owner, if he so desires, may seek its reversion, the expropriation. If the consequential benefits exceed the
subject of course to t're return, at the very least, of the consequential damages, these · items should be
just compensation received. (Ouano, et. al. v. Republic, disregarded altogether as the basic value of the property
G.R. No.168770, 2011). should be paid in every case. The award of consequential
damages is not tantamount to unjust enrichment. (Republic
JUST COMPENSATION v. CA, G.R. No. 160379, 2009).
(a) DETERMINATION The general rule is that the just compensation to whlch the
It is just if the owner receives a sum equivalent to the owner of the condemned property is entitled to is the
market value of his property and if it is paid within a market value. The general rule, however. is modified
reasonable period, Market value is generally defined as the where only a part of a certain property is expropriated. In
fair value of the property as between one who desires to such a case, the owner is not restrlcted to compensation
purchase and one who desires to sell. for the portion actually taken, he is also entitled to
recover the consequential damage, if any, to the
If municipal property is acquired in its corporate or private remaining part of the property. In thi3 case, petitioner
capacity, the State must pay just compensation. But ·.tit is contends that BPl's building was "never taken" by
any other property such as public buildings or held by the petitioner, and that to award consequential damages for
municipality for the State in trust for the inhabitants, the , the building was unfounded and without legal basis.
State is free to dispose of it at will, without any Petitioner's contention Is unmeritorious. No actual taking of
compensation. (Land Bank v. Spouses Orilla, G.R. No. the remaining portion of the real property is necessary to
157206, 2008). grant consequential damages. If as a result of the
exproprtatlon made by petitioner, the remaining lot of
Just cornpensation is defined as the full and fair equivalent private respondent suffers from impairment or decrease in
of the property taken from its owner by the expropriator. value, consequential damages may be awarded to private
The measure is not the taker's gain, but the owner's loss. respondent. (DPWH v. BPI, G.R. No. 203039, 2013).
The word "just" is used to intensify the meaning of the word
"compensation" and to convey thereby the idea that the The tax benefit granted to the establtshmsnts can be
equivalent to be rendered for the property to be taken shall deemed as their just compensation for private property
be real, substantial, full and ample. (Republic of the taken by the State for public use. The taxation power can
Philippines, represented by the National Irrigation also be used as an implement for the exercise of the power
Administration v. Rural Bank of Kabacan Inc., G.R. No. of eminent domain. (Commissioner of Internal Revenue v.
185124, 2012). Central Luzon Drug Corporation, G.R. No. 159647, 2005).
Just compensation is the fair market value of the property. The Court also upheld the CA ruling, which deleted the
Fair market value is that "sum of money which a person incluslon of the value of the excavated soil In the payment ', '.!.'·
desirous but not compelled to buy, and an owner willing but for jus! compensation. There is no legal basis to separate
not compelled to sell, would agree on as a price to be given the value of the excavated soil from that of the expropriated
and received therefor." (NAPOCOR v. Ong Co, G.R. No. properties. In the context of expropriation proceedings, the
166973, 2009). soil has no value separate from that of the expropriated
land. Just compensation ordinarily refers to the value of the
Among the factors to be considered in arriving at the fair land to compensate for what the owner actually loses.
market value of the property are the cost of acquisition, the Such value could only be that which prevailed at the time
current value of like properties, its actual or potential uses, of the taking. (Republic of the Philippines, represented by
and in the particular case of lands, their size, shape,
Page 128 of 320
ATENEO CENTRAL
BAR OPERATIONS 2019 POLITICAL LAW
the National Irrigation Administration v. Rural Bank of Effect of non-payment of just compensation
Kabacan lnc., G.R. No. 1.85124, 2012). Non-payment of just compensation does not entitle the
private landowners to recover possession of their
The determination of "just compensation" in eminent expropriated lot. But, th~ prolonged occupation of the
domain case is a judicial fur.ction. The executive government without instituting expropriation proceedings
department or the legislature may make the initial will entitle the landowner to damages. Such pecuniary loss
. determinations, but when a party claims a violation of the entitles him to adequate cornpensat'on in the form of actual
guarantee in the Bill of Rights that private property may not or compensatory darnaqes, which in this case should be
be taken for public use without just compensation, no the legal interest (6%) on th~ value of the land at the time
statute. decree, or executive order can mandate that its of taking, from said point up to full payment. (City of lloilo
own determination shall prevail over the court's findings. v. Besana, G. R. No. 168967, 2010).
Much less can the courts be precluded from looking into
the "just-ness" of the decreed compensation. (Land Bank While the prevailing doctrine is that "the non-payment of
v. Dumlao, et. al., G. R. No. 167809, 2009). just compensation does not entitle the private landowner
to recover possession of the expropriated lots, however, in
The formula for determination of just compensation to cases where the government failed to pay just
landowners doesn't include the factor for inflation rate, as compensation within five (5) years from the finality of the
inflation is properly accounted for through payment of judgment in the expropriation proceedings, the owners
interest on the amount due to the landowner. and through concerned shall have the right to recover possession of
the award of exemplary damages and attorney's fees in their property. This is in consonance with the principle that
cases where there was irregularity in tho taking of property. "the government cannot keep the property and dishonor
(National Power Corporation v. Manalastas, G.R. No. the judgment." To be sure, the five-year period limitation
196140, 2016). will encourage the government to pay Just compensation
punctually. This is in keeping with justice and equity. After
Reckoning period all, it is the duty of the government, whenever it takes
The value of the property must be determined either as of property from private persons against their will, to facilitate
the date of the taking of the property or the filing of the the payment of just compensation. We defined just
complaint, "whichever came first." (Eslaban v. De compensationas not only the correct datermination of the
Onorio, G.R. No. 146062, 2001). amount to be paid to the property owner but also the
payment of the property within a reasonable time. Without
The time of the taking may be reckoned on October 24, prompt payment, compensation cannot be considered
1994, the date of the filing of the complaint. Although the "just." (Republic v. Lim, G.R. No. 161656, 2005).
.·. plaintiff took possession of the property in 1991, due to a
'
'· .: lease contract executed between plaintiff and defendant, New System of Immediate Payment under R.A. 8974;
the intention to expropriate was manifested only upon the application of the rule
filing of the complaint. (PNOC v. 11.Aaglasang, G.R. No. RA 8974 requires that the Government make a direct
155407, 2008). payment to the property owner betore the writ may issue
'.\ ,t'
·. for cases involving national government Infrastructure
Just compensation in agrarian cases government projects. Moreover, such payment is based on
In determining just compensation, the cost of acquisition of the zonal valuation of the BIR in the case of land, the value
the land, the current value of like properties, its nature, of the improvements or structures under the replacement
actual use and income, the sworn valuation by the owner, cost method, or if no such valuation is available in case of
the tax declarations, and the assessment made by utmost urgency, the proffered value of the property to be
\:...• government assessors, shall be considered. The social seized.
and economic benefits contributed by the farmers and the
farm workers and by governr,ent to the property as well as Thus if expropriation is engaged in by the national
the non-payment of taxes or loans secured from any government for purposes other than national infrastructure
govt;imment financing institution on the said land shall be projects, the assessed value standard and deposit mode
considered as additional factorsto determine its valuation. still applies.
(RA 6657, sec. 17. otherwise known as Comprehensive
Agrarian Reform Law of 1988).
Action to Recover Just Compensation v. Action for also be paid to the landowner without delay. (APO v. Land
Damages Bank, G.R. No. 164195, 2011 ).
ACTION TO RECOVER ACTION FOR
Without prompt payment, compensation cannot be
JUST COMPENSATION DAMAGES
considered "just'' inasmuch as the property owner is made
Also known as inverse Seeks to vindicate a legal to suffer the consequences of being immediately deprived
condemnation, has the wrong through damages, of his land while being made to wait for a decade or more
objective to recover the value which may be actual, before actually receiving the amount necessary to cope
of property taken in fact by moral, nominal, with his loss. (Land Bank v. Spouses Orilla, G.R. No.
the governmental defendant, temperate, liquidated, or 157206, 2008).
even though no formal exemplary
exercise of tha power of The Court imposes interest of 12% per annum until
eminent domain has been When a right is exercised payment of just compensation whenever the expropriator
attempted by the taking in a manner not has not immediately delivered the just compensation.
agency conformable wlth the (EPZA v. Pulido, G.R. No. ~88995, 2011).
norms enshrined in
Article 19 and like The concept of delay does not pertain to the ·length of time
provisions on human that elapsed from the filing of the Complaint until its
relatfons in the Civil resofution. Rather, it refers to the fact that property was
Code, and the exercise taken for public use before compensation was deposited
results to the damage of with the court having jurisdiction over the case. There will
another, a legal wrong is be delay if the property was taken for public use before
committed and the compensation was paid or deposited with the court. Hence,
wrongdoer is held between the taking of the property and the actual payment, ':
responsible. legal interests accrue in order to place the owners in a
position as good as the position they were in before the
The two actions are radically different in nature and taking occurred. (National Power Corporation v. Heirs of
purpose. The action to recover Just compensation is based Gregorio Ramoran, G.R. No. 193455, 2016)
on the Constitution while the action for damages is
predicated on statutory enactments. (NAPOCOR v. Heirs · ABANDONMENT OF INTENDED USE AND RIGHT OF
REPURCHASE
of Mabangkit Sangkay, G.R. No. 165828, 2011).
If the property ceases to be used for a public purpose, the
The fact that the owner rather than the expropriator brings property reverts lo the owner in fee simple. (Bernas, The
the action for recovery of just compensation does not 1987 Constitution: A Comprehensive Reviewer 2006).
change the essential nature of the suit as an inverse
condemnation, for the suit is not based on tort, but on the We now expressly hold that the taking of private property,
constitutional prohibiticn against the taking of property consequent to the Government's exercise of its power of
without just compensation. It would very well be contrary eminent domain, is always subject to the condition that the
to the ctsar language of the Constitution to bar the recovery property be devoted to the specific public purpose for
'"·"-'
of just compensation for private property taken for a public which it was taken. Corollarily, if this particular purpose or·
use solely on the basis of statutory prescription. intent is not initiated or not at all pursued, and is
peremptorily abandoned, then the former owners, if they
Effect of delay so desire, may seek the reversion of the property, subject
While confirming the State's Inberent power and right to to the return of the amount of just compensation received.
take private property for public use, this provision at the In such a case, the exercise of the power of eminent ; ~~
·...:.,-•
same time lays down the limitation in the exercise of this domain has become improper for lack of the required
power. When it takes property pursuant to Its inherent right factual justification. (Mactan-Cebu International Airport v.
Lozada, G.R. No. 176625, 2010). ·--....·
and power, the State has the corresponding obligation to
pay the owner just compensation for the property taken.
For compensation to be considered "lust," it must not only
be the full and fair equivalent of the property taken; it must '' ~.
An LGU like the Municipality of Paranaque, cannot No law impairing the obligation of contracts shall be
authorize an expropriation of private property through a passed. (Phil. Consl, art. 3, § 10)
mere resolution of its lawmaking body. The Local
Government Code expressly and clearly requires an What constitutes Impairment:
ordinance or a loCRI law for the purpose. A resolution that 1. If it changes the terms and conditions of a legal
merely expresses the sentiment or opinion of the Municipal contract either as to the time or mode of performance
Council will not suffice. On the other hand, the principle of 2. If it imposes new conditions or dispenses with those
res judicata does not bar subsequent proceedings for the expressed
expropriation of the same property when all the legal . 3. If it authorizes for its satisfaction $Omething different
requirements for its valid exercise are complied with. from that provided in its terms.
(Municipality of Paranaque v. V.M. Realty Corporation,
G.R. No. 127820, 1998). A mere change in procedural remedies which does not
:
-~- ...,
;;
change the substance of the contract, and which still
Judicial review leaves an efficacious remedy for enforcement does not
f·.,..._;.~ Matters that may be reviewed by the courts (ANP): impair the obligation of contracts.
1. The Adequacy of the compensation
2. The Necessity of the taking The non-impairment clause of the Constitution must yield
3. The "Public Use" character of the taking ta the loftier purposes targeted by the Government. Tlrns
·. and again, this Court has said that contracts affecting
If the expropriation is pursuant to a specific law passed by public interest contain an implied reservation of the police
Congress, the courts cannot question the public use power as a postulate of the existing legal order. This
character of the taking. Any law fixing the amount of just power can be activated at any time to change the
Page 131 of 320
ATENEO CENTRAL
BAR OPERATIONS 2019 POLITICAL LAW
provisions of the contract, or even abrogate it entirely, for (Pryce Corporatlon v. China Banking Corporation, G.R.
the promotion or protection of the general welfare. Such No. 72302, 2014).
an act will not militate against the impairment clause, which ,
is subject to and limited by the paramount police power. CONTEMPORARY APPLICATION OF THE CONTRACT
(Chavez v. Cornelec, G.R. No. 162777, 2004). CLAUSE
Zoning regulations are superior to contractual restrictions Police power is superior to the right to contract. (Bernas,
on the use of property. (Ortigas and Co. v. FEATI Bank, the 1987 Philippine Constitution: A Comprehensive
G.R No. L-24670, 1979). .. Reviewer, 2009).
There is nothing in Section 5 © of P.D. No. 902-A The parties to a contract cannot, through the exercise of
(Rehabllitation Act) authorizing the change or modification prophetic discernment, fetter the exercise of the taxing
of contracts entered into by the distressed corporation and power of the State. For not only are existing laws read into
its creditors. It merely provides that "all actions for claims contracts in order to fix obligations as between parties, but
against corporations, partnerships or associations under the reservation of essential attributes of sovereign power
management or receivership pending before any court, is also read into contracts as a basic postulate of the legal
tribunal, board or body shall be suspended accordingly." order. The policy of protecting contracts against
(Leca Realty v. Manuela Corporation, G.R. No. 166800, impairment presupposes the maintenance of a
2007). government, which retains adequate authority to secure
the peace and good order of society. In truth, the Contract
Even granting that the "agreement'' between the two Clause has never been thought as a limitation on the
governments or their representatives creates a binding exercise of the State's power of taxation save only where
obligation under intemauonet law, it remains incumbent for a tax exemption has been granted for a valid consideration.
each contracting party to adhere to its own internal !aw in (Tolentino v. Secretary of Finance, G.R. No. 115455,
the process of complying with its obligations. The promises 1995).
made by a Philippine president or his alter E:!gos to a foreign
monarch are not transubstantiated by divine right so as to
ipso facto render legal rights of private persons obviated. FREE ACCESS TO COURTS AND ADEQUA 1 E LEGAL
(Kuwait Airways v. Philippine Airlines, G.R. No. 156087, ASSISTANCE
2009). Free access to the courts and quasi-judicial bodies and
adequate legal assistance shall not be denied to any
License agreements are not contracts within the purview person by reason of poverty. (Phil. Const., art. 3, § 11 ).
of the due process and the no.ti-impairment of contracts
clauses enshrined in the Constitution. (Republic v. Indigent litigants:
Pagadian City Timber, G.R. No. 159308, 2008). 1. whose gross income and that of their immediate family !I• .
do not exceed four thousand (P4,000.00) pesos a
Timber licenses, permits, and license aqreernents are the month if residing in Metro Manila, and three thousand
principal instruments by which the State regulates the (P3,000.00} pesos a month if residing outside Metro
utilization and disposition of forest resources to the end Manila, and
that public welfare is promoted. It cannot be denied that 2. Who do not own real property with an assessed value
they merely evidence a privilege granted by the State, and of more than fifty thousand (P50,000.00) pesos shall
it does not vest a permanent or irrevocable right. They are be exempt from the payment of legal fees (Sec. 19,
not deemed contracts within the due process of law clause. Rule 141, Rules of Court).
(Oposa v Factoran, G.R. No. 101083, 1993; C&M Timber
t'
·, -
Corporation v. Alcala, G.R. No. 111088, 1997).
·. ~
ATENEO CENTRAL
BAR OPERATIONS 2019 POLITICAL LAW
RIGHTS OF SUSPECTS UNDER CUST..QQ!Ab Custodial investigation involves any questioning initiated
INVESTIGATION 'by law enforcement officers after a person has been
taken Into custody or otherwise deprived of his freedom of
1. Any person under investigation for the commission of actior. in any significant way and begins to operate only
an offense shall have the right to be informed of his after the investigation ceases to be a general inquiry into
right to remain silent and to have competent and an unsolved crime and begins to focus on a particular
independent counsel preferably of his own choice. If suspect, such that the suspect Is taken into custody, and
the person cannot afford the services of counsel, he the police carries out a process of interrogations that
must be provided with one. These rights cannot be lends itse!fto eliciting incriminating statements (People v.
waived except in writing and in the presence of Marra, G.R. No. 108494, 1994).
counsel.
2. No torture, force, violence, threat, intimidation, or any AVAILABlLITY
other means which vitiate the free will shall be used The right becomes available where the "investigation is
against him. Secret detention places, solitary, no longer a general Inquiry into an unsolved crime but
incommunicado, or other similar forms of detention are has begun to focus on a particular suspect, the suspect
prohibited. has been taken into police custody, the police carry out a
3. Any confession or admission obtained in violation of process of interrogation that lends itself to eliciting
this or Section 17 hereof shall be inadmissible in incriminating statements." (Escobedo v. Illinois, 378 U.S.
evidence against him. 478, 1964).
4. The law shcill provide for penal and civil sanctions for
violations of this section as well as compensation to It commences when a person is taken into custody and
and rehabilitation of victims of torture or similar singled out as a suspect in the commission of a crime
practices, and their families. (Phil. Const., art. 3, § 12). under investigation. (People v. Reyes, G.R. No. 178300,
2009).
Rights of persons under custodial investigation or
Miranda Rights (SCIP) RA 7438 however, has extended the guarantee to
1. The right to remain Silent- Unlike Section 17 where individuals who have not been formally arrested but has
the absolute right to remain silent is available to an been merely "Invited for questioning." (Bernas, The
. accused, Section 12 gives a person under 1987 Philippine Constitution: A Comprehansive Reviewer,
investigation the right to refuse to answer any 2011 ).
question.
2. The right to gompetent and independent counsel, Scope
preferably of his own choice - Right to independent
APPLIES TO DOES NOT APPLY TO
counsel is to ensure an !mpartial lawyer to inform the
accused of his rights, as against experiences during Testimonial Body of the accused when it is
the Marcos regime (Bernas, the 1987 Philippine compulsion proposed to be examined.
Constitution: A Comprehensive Reviewer, 2009).
When is one not an independent counsel? - Special e.g., urine sample,
I ·~
counsel, public or private prosecutor, counsel of the photographs, measurements,
police, municipal attorney, mayor, barangay captain, garments
(People v. Gamboa, GR
and any other whose interested may be adverse to
91374, '/991).
accused (Bernas, the 1987 Philippine Constitution: A
Comprehensive Reviewer, 2009).
3. Right to be Informed of these rights - Non-availability
Contemplates the transmlsslco of meaningful The rights are not available before govemment
information rather than just the ceremonial and investigators become involved {Bernas, The 1987
perfunctory recitation of an abstract constitutional Philippine Constitution: A Comprohensive Reviewer,
principle. (People v. Rojas, G.R. Nos. L-46960-62, 2011):
1987). 1. Admissions made in administrative investigations
4. Right to be Provided with the services of counsel if he . conducted by the Philipplne Airlines {People v. Judge
cannot afford the services of one. (People v. Ayson, G.R. No. 85215, 1989).
Reyes, 581 SCRA 691, 2009). 2. Admissions made to private individuals (People v.
Tawat, G.R. No. L-62871, 1984 ).
Page 133 of 320
ATENEO CENTRAL
BAR OPERATIONS 2019 POLITICAL LAW
3. Persons undergoing audit (Navallo v. Sandiganbayan, offense (police, OOJ, context of a formal
G.R. No.97214, 1994) . NBI) investigation.
4. Verbal admissions made to a radio announcer who 4. Statements made to a
was not part of the investigation (People v. Ordono, private person. ·
G.R. No. 132154, 2000). 5. Signing of arrest
5. Admissions made to a mayor who is approached not reports and booking
as mayor but as confidante (People v. Zuela, G.R. No. sheets.
112177, 2000).
6. An interview recorded on video in the presence of
newsmen, but the court warned that trial courts should The criminal process includes .
admit similar confessions with extreme caution. 1. the investigation prior to filing of charges,
(People v. Endino, G.R. No. 133026, 2001 ). 2. the preliminary examination
7. Persons who voluntarily surrender, where no written 3. investigation after charges are filed, and
confession was sought to be presented in evidence as 4. the period of trial.
a result of a formal custodial investigation (People v.
Taylaran, G.R. No. L-49149, 1981). The Miranda rights when the inquiry is under the control of
8. Spontaneous statements, not elicited through police officers (first 3) because the psyc.hological if not
questioning by the authorities, but given in an ordinary physical atmosphere of custodial investigations, in the
manner whereby the accused orally admits having absence of proper standards, is inherently coercive. As an
committed the crime (People v. Baloloy, G.R. No. exception. even after charges are filed, the police might stiil
1407 40, 2002). attempt to extract confessions or admissions from the
9. Person in a police line-up not entitled to counsel. accused outside of judicial supervision. Outside this
(Gamboa v. Judge Cruz, 162 SCRA 642, 1988). exception, Sections 14 and 17 ere applicable. (Bernas,
10. Administrative proceedings (First Class Cadet Aldrin The 1987 Philippine Constitution: A Comprehensive
Jeff P. Cudia of the PMA v. The Superintendent of Reviewer, 2011 ).
PMA, G.R. No. 211362, 2015)
11. Signing of arrest reports and booking sheets. It is not REQUISITES
an extra-judicial statement and cannot be the basis of The rights under this section are available to "any person
a judgment of conviction. The Booking Sheet is merely under investigation for the commission of an offense".
a statement of the accused's being booked and of the These rights, following the ruling in Escobedo v. Illinois,
date which accompanies the fact of an arrest (People were seen as beginning to be available only when "the
v. Morico, G.R. No. 92660, 1995 citing People v. investigation is no longer a general inquiry into an unsolved
Bandin, G.R. No. 104494, 1993). crime but has begun to focus on a particular suspect, the
suspect has been taken into police custody, the police
Summary carry out a process of interrogations that lends itself to
eliciting incriminating statements". Although the 1986
WHEN AVAILABLE WHEN NOT AVAILABLE
deliberations. together with the Ga Iman case, leads to the
1 . After a person has 1. During a police line-up conclusion that the rights are available if a person is
been taken into Exception: Once there already In custody as a suspect, or if the person is the
custody is a move among the suspect, even if he is not yet deprived in any significant
2. When a person is way of his liberty, jurisprudence under the 1987
investigators to elicit
deprived of his freedom Constitution has consistently upheld the stricter view
admissions or
of action in · any confessions from the pronounced in Escobedo. (Bernas, The 1987 Philippine
significant w'3y suspect. Constitution: A Comprehensive Reviewer, 2011).
3. When a person is 2. During administrative r '
merely "invited" for investigations. The rights are available "after a person has been taken into
questioning (R.A. No. 3. Confessions made · by custody or otherwise deprived of his freedom of action in :f ).
any significant way." (People v. Loveria, G.R. No. 79138, .·........-
7438) an accused at !he time
4. The investigation is 1990).
he volunldrily
being conducted by the surrendered to the
government with police or outside the The moment a police officer tries to elicit information from : .._
the suspect, a counsel should at that juncture, assist the .....~
respect to a criminal
suspect, unless he waives this right in writing and in the
Page 134 of 320
ATENEO CENTRAL
BAR OPERATIONS 2019 POLITICAL LAW
1. To honor the presumption of innocence until his guilt is custody over him has been acquired by the judicial
proven beyond reasonable doubt authorities, either by lawful arrest or voluntary surrender.
2. To enable him to prepare his defense without being Only those who have been either arrested, detained, or
subjected to punishment before conviction (Cortes v. otherwise deprived of their freedom, will ever have the
Catral, 270 SCRA 1, 1997). occasion to seek the protective mantle extended by the
right to bail. But the person seeking provisional release
General Rule: All persons actually detained shall, before · · need not wait for a formal complaint or information to be
conviction be entitled to bail. (Phil. Const., art. 3, § 13). filed against him. (?&deranga v. Court of Appeals, G.R. No.
115407, 1995).
I .,
''..1-"
,;. ;;
. Page 136 of 320
ATENEO CENTRAL
BAR OPERATIONS 2019 POLITICAL LAW
· A person is considered to be "in the custody of law" If appellant Escapes from prison or confinement
when: If appellant Jumps bail
1. He is arrested by virtue of a warrant of arrest or by If appellant Flees to another country during the
warrantless arrest; pendency of the appeal (ROC, Rule 124, § 8; Rule 125,
2. He has voluntarily submitted himself to the jurisdiction § 1 ).
of the court by surrendering to the proper authorities
Apart from bail, a person may attain provisional liberty
The SC held that when the person has actually posted a through recognizance, which is an obligation of record
bail bond, which was accepted by the court, he has entered into by a third person before a court, guaranteeing
effectively submitted himself to the jurisdiction of the court the appearance of the accused for trial. It is in the nature
over his person. (Pader-anga v. Court of Appeals, G.R No. of a contract between the surety and the state. (People v.
115407, 1995). Abner, G.R. No. L-2508, 1950) ·
~trong evidence means evident proof or presumption Since the grant of bail is discretionary and can only be
is great determined by judicial findings, such discretion can only be
exercised after evidence is submitted to the court, the
• Evident proof means clear, strong evidence which leads petitioner has the right of cross examination and to
a well-guarded dispassionate Judgment to the introduce his own evidence in rebuttal. (Santos v. Judge
conclusion that the offense has been committed as
charged, and that the accused is the guilty agent. How, AM./ RTJ-05-1946, 2007).
• Presumption is great when the circumstances testified A mere claim of illness is not a ground for bail. Bail is not a
to are such that the inference of guilt naturally to be
sick pass for an ailing or aged detainee or prisoner needing
drawn therefrom is strong, clear, and convincing to an
medical care outside the prison facility. (People v.
unbiased judgment and excuses all reasonable
probability of any other conclusion. (People v. Judge Fitzgerald, G.R. 149723, 2006}.
Cabral, G.R. No. 131909, 1999).
'BUT SEE: Accordingly, we conclude that the
Other rights in relation to bail: Sandiganbayan arbitrarily ignored the objective of bail to
1. The right to bail shall not be impaired even when the
ensus the appearance of the accused durino the trial· and
unwarrar.tedly disregarded the clear showing of the fraqile
privilege of the writ of habeas corpus is suspended;
health ancJ advanced age of Enrile. As such, the
2. Excessive bail shall not be required (Phil. Const., art.
Sctndiganbayan gravely abused its discretion in denying
3, § 13).
Enrile's Motion to Fix Bail. (Juan Ponce Enrile v.
Sandigar,bayan, G.R. No. 213847, 2015)
Factors to ·be considered in setting the amount of bail:
(F3P3 WANC)
Bail in deportation proceedings
0. Financial Ability of the accused to give bail
As a general rule, the constitutional right to bail is available
1. Forfeiture of other bail
only in criminal proceedings. Thus, they do not apply in
2. The accused was a Fugitive from justice when arrested
deportation proceedings, which are administrative in
3. Probability of the accused appearing at tile trial
nature. However, see Mejoff v. Director of Prisons where
4. Penalty for the offense charged
the court applied the general principles ·Jf international law
5. Pendency of other cases where the accused is on bail
r. -. found in the UDHR and ordered reieased under a bond in
6. Character and reputation of the accused
a Habeas Corpus petition (Bernas, The 1987 Philippine
7. Age and health of the accused
Constitution: A Comprehensive Reviewer, 2011).
8. Weight of the evidence against the accused
9. Nature and circumstance of the offense (ROC, Rule
Ball in extradition cases
114,§6).
Our extradition law does not provide for the grant of bail to
·~,, ';, Where the right to bail exists, it should not be rendered an extraditee. There Is no provision prohibiting him or her
';'··
nugatory by requiring a sum that is excessive. (De La from filing a motion for bail, a right to due process under
,·. - ' Camara v, Enage, G.R. Nos. l-32951~2, 1971 ). the Constitution.
•:_.)
··... )
Page 137 of 320
ATENEO CENTRAL
BAR OPERATIONS 2019 POLITICAL LAW
potential extradltee may be subject to arrest, to a Right to Compulsory process to secure the attendance
prolonged restraint of liberty, and forced to transfer to the of witnesses (Bernas. Tho 1987 Constitution: A
demanding state followir,g the proceedings. Comprehensive Reviewer 2011 ).
When evidence of parties are evenly balanced, it should tilt further prosecution for the same cause
in favor of accused Find constitutional presumption of 3. To· inform the court of the facts alleged (U.S. v. J
. ':.s
innocence should prevail (Corpuz v. People, G.R. No. Karelsen, 3 Phil. 223, 1904).
180016, 1991 ).
If the information fails to allege the material elements of the
4. RIGHT TO BE HEARD offense, the accused cannot be convicted thereof even if ( '.·.
Includes the right to be present at the trial from arraignment the prosecution is able to present evidence during the trial
to promulgation of sentence. (U.S. Beecham, 23 Phil. 259, with respect to such elements.
1972). After arraignment, trial may proceed
notwithstanding absence of accused. Th9 real nature of the crime charged is determined from
the recital of facts in the information. It is not based on the
Elements: (PIC3) caption, preamble or from the cited provision of law
allegedly violate<!. {People v. Labado, 98 SCRA 730,
Right to be Present at the trial;
1980).
Right to Counsel;
Right to an lrnparttal judge;
General Rule: It is unnecessary to state in the information
Right of Confrontation; ·-.... ..
the precise date that the offense was committed ;;'
i
Page 138 of 320 <.,
ATENEO CENTRAL
BAR OPERATIONS 2019 POLITICAL LAW
8. RIGHT OF CONF~ONTATION
Requisitas: (ANU)
The accused has been validly Arraiqnedand
Purposes of this right:
Accused has been duly Notified ·
To afford the accused an opportunity to cross-exarnlne His failure to appear is Unjustifiable. (Parada v.
the witness . Veneracion, 269 SCRA 371, 1997).
To allow the judge the opportunity to observe the
conduct or demeanor of the witness (Bernas, The 1987 This Is allowed to speed up disposition of criminal cases.
Constitution: A Comprehensive Reviewer 2011 ). ' (People v. Snlas, 143 SCRA 163, 1986)
'
Exceptions to the right to face witnesses: Exceptions:
The admissibility of "dying declarations" If the accused, after arraignment, has stipulated that he
Trial in absentia under Section 14(2) is indeed the person charged with the offense and
With respect to child testimony (Bernas, The 1987 named In the information; and that any time a witness
-Constitution: A Comprehensive Reviewer 2011 ). refers to a name by which he is known, the wimess .is
to be understood as referring to him.
Notes:
The accused may waive the right to be present at the
• If the failure of the accused to cross-examine a witness trial by not showing up. However, the court can still
is due to his own fault or was not due to the fault of the compel the attendance of the accused if necessary, for
prosecution, the testimony of the witness should be identification purposes.
excluded.
Promulgation of judgment
• It Is demandable only during trials. Thus, it cannot be
Wh:le the accused is entitled to be present during
availed of during preliminary investigations.
promulgation of judgment, the absence of his counsel
• Right of confrontation is available during trial which during such promulgation does not affect its validity.
begins only upon arraignment. .....
Promulgation of judgment in absentia ls valid provided
9 COMPULSORY PROCESS that the essential elements are present:
• that the judgment be recorded in ihe criminal docket ..
The 1973 and 1987 Constitutions expanded the right to ·•. ·t
• that a copy be served upon the accused or counsel.
compulsory process wh!ch now includes the right to
Recording the decision in the criminal docket of the \._.'
secure the production of evidence in one's behalf. By .
court satisfies the requirement of notifying the accused
analogy, U.S. v. Ramirez which laid down the requisites
of the decision wherever he may be. (Estrada v.
for compelling the attendance of witnesses, may be
People, G.R. No. 162371, 2005).
applied to this expanded concept. Thus, the movant must
show:
WHEN PRESENCE OF THE ACCUSED IS A DUTY
A. that the evidence is really rr.aterial:
1. Arraignment and Plea ·
B. that he is not guilt:1 of neglect in previously obtaining
2. During Trial, for identification
the production of such evidence; -,
3. Promulgation of Sentence '. ~,.;.,:
C. that the evidence will be available at the time desired:
cind s
Exception: Light offense where accused need not ',.v ,
0. that no similar evidence could be obtained (Bernas, personally appear.
The 1987 Constitution: A Comprehensive Reviewer
2011 ).
-------------------------------··-·-------·-- .. -- .. --··-- - .
ATENEO CENTRAL
BAR OPERATIONS 2019
POLITICAL LAW
identical activities in cyberspace. As previously discussed, Ylagan, 58 Phil. 851, v. Balisacan, G.R. No. L-
ACPA's definition of child pornography in fact already 1993} 26376, 1966)
covers the use of "electronic, mechanical, digital, optical, 3. If the information for an
' magnetic or any other means." Thus, charging the offender offense cognizable by
under both Section 4(c)(2) and ACPA would likewise be th!'} RTC is filed with the
tantamount to a violation of the constitutional prohibition MTC. There is no
against double jeopardy. (Disini v. Sec. of Justice, G.R No. jurisdiction here. (People
203335, 2014) v. lbasan, Sr., 129 SCRA
695, 1984)
Kinds of Jeopardy
4. If a complaint filed for
SAMEOFFESE SAME ACT preliminary investigation
is dismissed. (People v.
"No person shall be twice "When an act is punished by Oaco, L-17212, 1962)
put in jeopardy of a law and an ordinance,
punishment for the same conviction or acquittal under
offense." either shall constitute a bar The first jeo:,ardy must have been terminated.
to another prosecution for 1. Acquittal;
the same act." 2. Conviction; or
3. Dismissal without the express consent of the accused
Conviction, acquittal, or Only conviction or acquittal • Dismissal based on violation of the right to a
dismissal of the case - not dismissal without the speedy trial amounts to an acquittal
without the express express consent of the • Dismissal based on demurrer to evidence is a
consent of the accused accused - will bar a dismissal on the merits ( .
will bar a subsequent subsequent prosecution.
• Dismissal on motion of the prosecution,
prosecution.
subsequent to a motior. for reinvestigation
filed by the accused
Requisites • Discharge of an accused to be a state witness.
1. A first jeopardy must have attached prior to the second. This amounts to an acquittal.
2 The first jeopardy must have been terminated. • Dismissal on the merits
3. The second jeopardy must be for the same offense as
that in the first. (Bernas, The 1987 Constitution: A If the first dismissal was based on the merits. there should
Comprehensive Reviewer, 2011) be no second prosecution. If the first dismissal was not
based on the merits and was erroneous, one should look v .:
First jeopardy must have attached
at whether the dismissal was with the consent of the
WHEN JEOPARDY WHEN JEOPARDY DOES accused. If not, there should be no second prosecution.
ATIACHES NOT ATIACH (Bernas, The 1987 Philippine Constitution: A ·
Comprehensive Reviewer, 2011)
(Code: CICAP) 1. If information does not
1. A person is ,g,harged charge any offense The second jeopardy must be for the same offense,
2. Under a complaint or (People v. Judge one that includes or is necessarily included in the first
Information sufficient Cor.sulta, :..-41251, offense or is an attempt or frustration of the first.
in form and substance 1976) (Bernas, The 1987 Philippine Constitution: A
., \
to sustain a conviction 2. If, upon pleading guilty, Comprehensive Reviewer, 2011)
3. Before a court of the accused presents
&,ompetent evidence of complete Same Offense
Jurisdiction self-defense, and the 1. Exact identity between the offenses charged in the first
4. After the person is court thereafter acqults and second cases.
Arraigned him without entering a 2. One offense is an attempt to commit or a frustration of
5. Such person enters a new plea of not guiity for the other offense.
valid flea. (People v. accused. There is no 3. One offense is necessarily Included or necessary
valid plea here. (People includes the other. . "·
:
'-.,,,
"
4. The situation is different when one act violates two MOTIONS FOR RECONSIDERATIONAND APPEALS
different statutes or two different provisions of a statute.
The rule in such a case is that if the 011e act results in Motions for Reconsideration
two different offenses, prosecution under one Is a bar At any time before a Judgment of conviction becomes final,
to prosecution under the other. (Bernas, The 1987 the court may, upon motion of the accused or at its own
Constitution of the Republic of the Philippines, 2011 ). instance, but with the consent of tho accused, grant a new
trial or reconsideration. (ROC, Rule 121, § 1)
Same evidence test
Whether the evidence needed in one case will support a "From the phraseology of the rule, it is evident that a motion
conviction in the other. (U.S. v. Tan Oco, 34 Phil. 772, for new trial or a motion for reconsideration applies when
1916) the judgment is one of conviction; and it is the accused, not
the prosecution which avails of the same." (Riano, Criminal
However, this applies only in a more general sense, hence Procedure, 583, 2014) ·
it is the test laid down under Section 9 of Rule 117 of the
Revised Rules of Criminal Procedure that should apply. Appeals
This states that one offense must necessarily be induded Any :)arty may appeal from a judgment or final order,
in the other, i.e., whether one offense Is identical with the unless the accused will be placed in double Jeopardy.
other or whether one offense necessarily includes or is (ROC, Ruis 122, § 1)
necessarily included in the other. Identity of offenses does
not require one-to-one correspondence between the facts General Rule: The prosecution may not appeal an
and law involved in the two charges. (Bernas, The 1987 acquittal, and an acquittal is immediately ·,inal. (ROC, Rule
Philippine Constitution: A Comprehensive Reviewer, 2011) 120, § 7)
.
;":
·'
"
'\
L.,",
Page 145 of 320
·,..__;
····-·--·----- ··-------------------·
ATENEO CENTRAL
BAR OPERATIONS 2019
POLITICAL LAW
revived or refiled even beyond the prescribed periods , It exposes a person to public humiliation (e.g., being tarred
and feathered, then paraded throughout town).
subject to the right of the accused to oppose the same on
the ground of double jeopardy or that such revival or
refiling is barred by the statute of limitations. (People v. Excessive fine
Panfilo Lacson, G.R. 149453, 2003) When under any circumstance, the fine is disproportionate
to the offense.
! "-
1.• ... v=
INVOLUNTARY SERVITUDE Guides for detemalning whether a punishment is
"cruel and unusual":
Involuntary servitude ~. It must not be so severe as to be deg, ading to the
Every condition of enforced or compulsory service of one dignity of human beings.
to another no matter under what form such servitude may 2. It must not be applied arbitrarily.
be disguised. (Rubi v. Provincial Board, 39 Phil. 660, 3. It must not be unacceptable to contemporary society. '·,
I.
1919) ~
.... ....
4. It must not be excessive.
....
ATENEO CENTRAL
BAR OPERATIONS 2019 POLITICAL LAW
Note:
• It must serve a penal purpose more effectively than a NON-IMPRISONMENT FOR DEBTS
less severe punishment would (Brennan concurring in
Furman v. Georgia, 408 U.S. 238, 1972) No person shall be imprisoned for debt or non-payment of
• R.A. 9346 prohibited the imposition of the death a poll tax. (Phil. Const., art. 3, § 20)
penalty. Only by an Act of Congress can it be reborn.
(Bernas, The 1987 Philippine Constitution: A Debt
Comprehensive Reviewer, 154, 2011) A contractual obligation, whether express or implied,
resulting in any liability to pay money. Thus, all other types
Death Penalty of obligations are not within the scope of this prohibition.
Death penalty was abolished because: (Bernas, The 1987 Philippine Constitution: A
• It inflicts traumatic pain not just on the convict but also Comprehensive Reviewer, 159, 2011)
on his family, even if the penalty is not carried out.
If an accused fails to pay the fine imposed upon him, this
• There was no convincing evidence that it is effect!ve
may result In his subsidiary imprisonment because his
as a deterrent of serious crime.
liability is ex delicto and not ex contractu. (Alejo v. Judge
• Penology favors reformative rather than vindictive
lnserto, AM. 1098 CFI, 1976)
penalties.
• Life is too precious a gift to be placed at the discretion A debtor may be imprisoned if the fraudulent debt
of a human judge. constitutes a crime such as estafa and has been duly
• The law itself, by imposing so many safeguards before convicted. (Bernas, The 1987 Philippine Constitution: A
such is carried out, manifests a reluctance to impose Comprehensive Reviewer, 2011)
it. (Bernas, The 1987 Philippine Cc,nstitution: A
Comprehensive Reviewer, 154, 2011)
EX POST FACTO LAWS AND
Legislature may re-impose i~. subject to the following .BILLS OF ATTAINDER
conditions:
No e::.< post facto law or bill of attainder shall be enacted.
• That Congress defines what is meant by heinous
(Phil. Const., art. 3, §22)
crimes.
That Congress specify and penalize by death, only Ex post facto law
those crimes that qualify as heinous in accordance with 1. Make~ an action done before the passing or the law,
the definition set in heinous crimes law or death penalty and which was innocent when done, criminal, and
law. punishes such action.
• That Congress, in enacting this death penalty bill, be 2. Aggravates the crime or makes it greater than when it
singularly motivated by "compelling reasons involving was committed.
heinous crimes." {People v. Echegaray, G.R. No. 3. Changes the punishment and inflicts a greater
117472, 1997) punishment than that which the law annexed to the
crime when lt was committed.
Under RA 7659: Heinous crimes are those which are 4. Alters 1he legal rules of evidence and receives less
grievous, odious, and hateful: and by reason of their testimony than the law required at the time of the
manifest wickedness, viciousness, atrocity, and perversity, commission of the offense ir: order to convict the
... ,..;.,· are repugnant and outrageous to the common standards accused.
and norms of decency and morality in a just, civilized, and 5. Assumes to regulate civi1 rights and remedies but in
ordered society. (People v. Echegaray, G.R. No. 117472, effect imposes a penalty or deprivation of a right, which
1997) when done was lawful.
6. Deprives a person accused of a crime of some lawful
The duty of a judge when an accused pleads guilty to a protection to which he has become entitled such as the
capital offense Is to look into the evidence to see if death protection of a former conviction or acquittal, or a
is the proper penalty. (People v. Vinuya, G.R. No. 125925. proclamation of amnesty. (Bernas, The 1987 Philippine
...._," 1999) Constitution: A Comprehensive Reviewer, 2011)
The prohibition on ex post facto laws only applies to judicial determination of guilt, during which, as the Solicitor
retrospective penal laws. (Bernas, The 1987 Pnilipp.ne General assumes, defense and justifications for non-
Constitution: A Comprehensive Reviewer. 201 ·1) compliance may be raised. Thus, Section _20 is valid
insofar as it applies to the provisions of Chapter IV which
Characteristics of an ex post facto law: are not struck down by the Court. (Disini v. Sec. of Justice,
1. Refers to criminal matters G.R.No.203335,2014)
2. Retrospective
3. Causes prejudice to the accused (Bernas, The 1987 WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS
Philippine Constitution: A Comprehensive Reviewer,
2011) The privilege of the writ of habeas corpus shall not be
suspended except in cases of invasion or rebellion when
Instances when the prohibition ,on ex-post facto laws the public safety requires it. (Phil. Const., art. 3, § 15)
is inapplicable:
A writ directed to the person · detaining another,
1. Extradition treaty .
commanding him to produce the body of the prisoner at a
2. Probation law
designated time and place, with the day and cause of his
3. Change of court Jurisdiction
caption and detention, to do, submit to, and receive
4. House rental law (Wright v. CA, 1994; Fajardo v. CA,
whatever the court or Judge awarding the writ shall
1999; Lacson v, Executive Secretary, 1999; Juarez v.
CA, 1992) consider in the behalf (Sombong v. CA, G.R. No. 111876,
1990).
Bill of attainder
Privilege of the writ of habeas corpus
An act by the legislature that inflicts punishment without The right to have an immediate determination of the
judicial trial. (Cummings v. Missouri, 4 Wall 277, 323 US, legality of the deprivation of physical liberty.
1867)
The bill of attainder does not need to be directed. at a The writ is never suspended. It always issues as a matter
specifically named person. It may also refer to easily of course. What is suspended Is the privilege of the writ.
ascertainable members of a group in such a way as to
inflict punishment on them without judicial trial. (Cummings' It requires deprivation of personal liberty:
v. Missouri, 4 Wall 277, 323 US, 1867) • Physical compulsion or coercion
• Duress
Elements (LINaW)" • Extsrnel moral compulsion
1 . There must be a Law • Founded on groundless fear
2. The law Imposes a penal burden • Erroneous belief in the existence of an imaginary
3. On a Named individual or easily ascertainable power of an imposter to cause harm if not blindly
members of a group obeyed
• Any psychclogical element that may curtail the
4. The penal burden Is imposed directly by the law
mental faculty of choice or the unhampered
Without judicie.l trial. (Bernas, The 1987 Philippine
exercise of the will
Constitution: A Comprehensive Re'tiewer, 2011)
Suspension of the privilege of the writ of habeas
Petitioners challenge Section 20 of the Cybercrime corpus
Prevention Act, alleging that it is a bill of attainder. The
argument is that the mere failure to comply constitutes a The President may suspend the privilege for a period not
exceeding 60 days. The grounds for the suspension of the
legislative finding of guilt, without regard to situations
privilege are:
where non-compliance would be reasonable or valid. The
Section was upheld. Since the non-compliance would be A. Actual invasion or actual rebellion
punished as a violation of PO 1829, Section 20 necessarily B. When the public safety requires the suspension
incorporates elements of the offense which are defined
therein. If Congress had intended for Section 20 to The suspension shali apply only to persons judicially
constitute an offense in and of itself, it would not have had charged for rebellion or offenses inherent in or directly
to make reference to any other statute or provision. Thus, connected with invasion. The crimir,al charge has to be
the act of non-compliance, for it to be punishable, must still filed In court within 3 days because, otherwise, the person
be done "knowingly or willfully." There must still be a shall be released. Thus, the suspension of the privilege will
not apply until such persons are placed in the custody of a
Page 148 of 320 ···.--'
ATENEO CENTRAL
BAR OPERATION3 2019 POLITICAL LAW
judicial officer. Congress is given the power to revoke the WRITS OF AMPARO, HABEAS DATA,
suspension and the President may not set aside such AND KALIKASAN
revocation. Congress, upon the initiative of the President,
may also extend tile suspension. The Supreme Court, WRIT OF AMPARO
upon the initiative of any citizen, may review the sufficiency
A remedy available to any person whose right to life, liberty
of the factual basis of the suspension and must promulgate
and security is violated or threatened with violation by an
its decision thereon within 30 days from filing.
unlawful act or omission of a public official or employee, or
of a private individual or er'itity. (Sec. of Defense v. Manalo,
What is suspended by the Executive is the privilege of the
586 SCRA 42, 2006).
writ and not the writ itself.
The Writ of Amparo does not cover threats to property. To
The Supreme Court has the power:
be entitled to a Writ of Amparo, petitioners must prove that
1. To determine arbitrariness in the manner of arriving at their rights to life, liberty, and security are being violated or
the suspension threatened by an unlawful act or omission. The intrusion
2. To determine the sufficiency or the factual basis of the into their farm was merely a violation of property rights.
suspension (Pador v. Arcayan, G.R. No. 16346, 2013).
The SC is empowered to determine whether. in fact, actual Examples of property rights not covered are:
invasion and rebellion exists and whether public safety
requires the suspension • Right to be restituted of personal belongings. It is
already subsumed under the general rubric of property
Habeas corpus cannot be used when: rights which are no longer protected by the writ of
1. To question the conditions of confinement; amparo. (Roxas v. Arroyo, G.R. No. 183155, 2010)
2. Once charges have been filed in court. • Merely seeking protection of property rights, like land in
possession of the petitioners (Castillo v. Cruz, G.R. No.
Limitations to the writ of habeas corpus 182165, 2009)
EXTENDS TO DOES NOT EXTEND TO • Violent incidents purely property-related such as acts of
terrorism in relation to a disputed land (Tapuz v. Hon.
All cases of illegal Questions of conditions of
.Judge del Rosario, G.R. No. 182484, 2006)
confinement or detention by confinement; but only .to
which any person is the fact and duration of
deprived of his liberty, or by confinement. Two-fold Burden for Public Authorities
which the rightful custody of
The burden for the public authorities to discharge in these
any person is withheld from It is not a means for the
the person entitled to it. situations, under the Rule on the Writ of Amparo, is two-
redress of grievances or to
seek injunctive retlef or fold.
It is essential to inquire into damages. (Jr. re: Major 1. The first is to ensure that all efforts at disclosure and
-. ::~ all manner of involuntary Aquino, G.R. 174994, ' investigation are undertaken under pain of indirect
restraint and to relieve a 2007). contempt from this Court when governmental efforts
person from it if such r.re less than what lhe individual situations require.
restraint is illegal. 2. The second is to address the disappearance, so that
- the life of the victim Is preserved and his or her liberty
and security restored. (Razon v. Tagitis, G.R. No.
182498, 2009).
evidence that will require full and exhaustive proceedings. data or information regard:ng the person, family, home and
(Razon v. Tagitis, G.R. No. 182498, 2009). correspondence of the aggrieved party. (Sec.1)
The petitioner in an amparo case has the burden of proving Where Writ must be Returned
by substantial evidence the indispensible element of 1. If issued by the RTC or any judge thereof, it shall be
returnable before such court or judge
government participation. (Spouses Mmtin and Santiago v.
2. If issued by the CA or Sandiganbayan or any of its
Tulfo, G.R. No. 205039, 2015). ·
justices, it may be returnable before such court or any
justice thereof, or to any RTC of the place where the
Elements of an Enforced Disappearance petitioner/responC:ent resides, or that which has
(1) That there be an arrest, detention, abduction or any Jurisdiction over the place where the date or information
form of deprivation of iiberty; is gathered, collected or stored
3. If issued by SC or any of its justices, it may be
(2) That it be carried out by, or with the authorization,
returnable before such court or any justice thereof, or
support or acquiescence of, the State or a political
· before the CA, SB or any of its justices, or to any RTC
organization;
(3) That it be followed by the· State or political
of the place where the petitloneorespcndent resides, or
that which has jurisdiction over thr place where the date
n,
' ~
··-·
organization's refusal to acknowledge or or information is gathered, collected or stored (Sec.4)
give information on the fate or whereabouts of the
person subiect of the amparo Where Enforce::tble
petition; and Anywhere in the Philippines (Sec.4)
......,
(4) That the intention for such refusal is to remove the
Petition
subject person from the protection of the law for a I. Verified
prolonged period of time. (Section 3(g) R.A. No. 9851: II. Must contain:
Mison v. Gallegos, G.R. No. 210759, 2015) A. personal circumstances of the petitioner and the
respondent
! :-
~OF HABEASDATA B. manner the right to privacy is violated or threatened ;._ ~'-;
and how it affects the right to life, liberty or security
Habeas Data of the aggrieved party
The writ of habeas data is a remedy available to any C. actions and recourses taken by the petitioner to
person whose right to privacy in life, liberty or security secure the data or information
._,,.;
is violated or threatened by an unlawful act or omission of D. the location of th efiles, registers or databases, the
a public official or employee, or of a private individual or government office, and the person in charge, in
entity engaged in the gathering, collecting, or storing of possession or in control of the data or information,
if known
Page 150 of 320 . .:..'
' ,;
ATENEO CENTRA~
BAR OPERATIONS 20·19 POLITICAL LAW
E::. the reliefs prayed for • which may include the otherwise disobeys or resists a lawful process or order of
updating, rectification, suppression, or destruction the court. (Sec. 11)
of the database or information or files kept by the
respondent (in case of threats, the relelf may When Defenses may be heard In Chambers
include a prayer for an order enjoining the act A hearing in chambers may be conducted where the
complained of) respondent invokes the defense that the release of the
F. such other relevant reliefs as are just and equitable data or information in question sha,I compromise national
(Sec.6) security or state secrets, or when the data or information
cannot be divulged to the public due to its nature or
Issuance of the Writ privileged character. (Sec. 12)
Court shall order the issuance of the writ if on its face it
ought to issue. The clerk of court shall issue the writ under Filing of Return
the seal of the court and cause it to be served within 3 days In case the respondem fails to file a return, the court,
from its issuance, or in case of urgont necessity. the justice or judge shall proceed to hear the petition ex parte,
justlce~udge may issue the writ under his own hand, and granting the petitioner such relief as the petition may
may deputize any officer or person to serve it. The writ shall warrant unless the court in its discretion requires the
also set the date and time for summary hearing of the petitioner to submit evidence (Sec. 14)
petition which shall not be later than 10 work days from the
date of its issuance. (Sec. 7) Judgment
. After summary hearing the court shall render judgment
Effect when Writ Refused to Issue or Serve within 10 days from the time the petition is submitted for
Person who refuses to issue writ after Its allowance or to decision. (Sec. 16)
serve the same, shall be punished by the court, or justice
for contempt without prejudice to other disclplinary action Return of Service
(Sec.8) The officer who executed the final judgment shall, within 3
;,
(·
•·. " days from its enforcement, make a verified return to the
How Writ Is Served court. The return shall contain a full statement of the
Writ shall be served upon the respondent by the officer or proceedings under the writ and a complete inventory of the
person deputized by the court. justice or judge who shall database or information, or documents and articles
retain a copy on which to make a return of service. In case inspected, updated, rectified, or deleted, with copies
the writ cannot be served personally on the respondent, served on the petitioner and the respondent. The officer
the rules on substituted service shall apply. (Soc.9) shall state in the return how the judgment was enforced
and complied with by the respondent, as well as all
Return objections of the parties regarding the manner and
Respondent shall file a verified written return with regularity of the service of the writ. (Sec. 17)
supporting affidavits within 5 work days from service of the Effect of Filing a Criminal Action
~·- L writ (period may be extended by the Court for justtfiable When a criminal action has been commenced, no separate
reasons) The return shall contain: petition for the writ shall be flied. The reliefs under the writ
A. lawful defenses such as national security, state secrets, shall be available to an aggrieved party by motion in the
privileged communication, confidentiality of the source criminal case.(Sec.22)
of information of media and others;
· B. in case of respondent in charge, in possession or in Appeals
control of the data or information subject of the petition Any party may appeal from the Judgment or final order to
(i) disclosure of the date or information about the the SC under Rule 45 to raise questions of fact or law or
petitioner, the nature of such data or information both. The period of appeal shall be 5 work days from date
..,.··_.,.·,.,,
{·
and the purpose for its cotlecdon; of notice of the judgment or final order. It shall have the
(ii) the steps or action taken by respondent to same priority as habeas corpus and amparo cases. (Sec.
ensure the security and confidentiality of the 19)
data or Info
.:
;;
... -
;•,
(iii)the currency and accuracy of the data or info WRIT OF KALIKASAN
~ ..• J held· ·
C. other allegations relevant to the resolution of the
The writ is a remedy ava!lable to a natural or juridical
proceeding
person, entity authorized by law, people's organization,
Contempt , non-governmental organization, or any public interest
Court may punish a person who commits contempt by group accreditect by or registered with any government
making a false return or refusing to make a return, or agency, on behalf of persons whose constitutional right to
a balanced and healthful ecology is violated, or threatened
Page 151 of 320
.--------------- ---·-·--· ··- .....
ATENEO CENTRAL
BAR OPERATIONS 2019 POLITICAL LAW
,.
Page 152 of 320 -~. ,,.
ATENEO CENTRAL
BAR OPERATIONS 2019 POLITICAL LAW
Qualifications
MODES OF ACQUIRING CITIZENSHIP
1. Not less than twenty-one years of age on the day of
1. Jus Soll - Acquisition cf citizenship on the basis of
the hearing of the petition;
place of birth.
2. Resided in the Philippines for a continuous period of
2. Jus Sanguinis -Acqulsltlon of citizenship on the basis
1 C years or more;
of blood relationship.
3. Of good moral character; believes In the principles
3. Naturalization - the legal act of adopting an alien and
underlying the Philippine Constitution; conducted
clothing him with the privilege of a native-born citizen
himself in a proper and irreproachable manner during
(Tecson v, COMELEC, 424 SCRA 277; Bernas, The
the entire period of his residence towards the
1987 Philippine Constitution: A Comprehensive
government and community
Reviewer, 2011 ed.) ·
4. Must own real estate in the Philippines worth P5,000
,: ';
The Philippines follows jus sanguinis and naturalization. or more OR must have lucrative trade, profession, or
(.;)
lawful occupation;
Naturalization is a mode for both acquisition (governed by
CA 473) and reacquisition (governed by CA 63) of 5. Able to speak or write English or Spanish or anyone of
Philippine citizenship. · · the principal languages; and
6. Enrolled his minor children of school age in any of the
Election of Philippine citizenship recognized schools where Phhlppine history,
government and civics are taught or prescribed as part
1. Prior to the 1973 Constitution - If a Filipina married an
of the school curriculum, during the entire period of the
alien, she loses her Filipino citizenship. Hence, her
residence in the Philippines required of him. (Sec. 2,
child would have to elect Filipino citizenship upon
CA 473)
reaching the age of majority.
2. Under the 1973 Constitution - Children born of Filipino
mothers were already considered Filipinos.
Marriage of a Filipino with an alien Citizens who lost their The only persons entitled lo
citizenship by rear.on of · repatriation are the
General Rule: The Filipino retains Philippine citizenship their naturalization as following:
Exception: By their act or omission they are deemed, citizens of a foreign 1. Filipino women who lost
under the law, to have renounced it. (1987 Const, art. 4, § country are deemed to their Philippine ()
4) have reacquired their citizenship by marriage
<
Philippine citizenship to aliens 'f.... /
How citizenship is lost: (CANDOR) upon taking the oath of 2. Natural-born Filipinos,
allegiance. including their minor
1. Cancellation of certificates of naturalization children who lost their
2. Serving in the Armed forces of an enemy country Philippine citizenship on t ._,
\ __i
3. Naturalizationin a foreign country account of political or
4. Being a Deserter of the armed forces of the country economic necessity
5. By subscribing to an Oath of allegiance to the laws or
constitution of a foreign country '
-----------~----~-------- -·--···
ATENEO CENTRAL
BAR OPERATIONS 2019 POLITICAL LAW
a. Position must be created by Constitution, amount. (Code of Conduct and Ethical Standards of Public
legislature, or through authority conferred by Officers)
legislature;
b. Portion of sovereign power of government Officer means any person holding any public office in the
must be· delegated to position; govt. of the RP by virtue of an appointment, election, or
c. Duties and powers must be defined, direcUy or contract (executed bet. private person and government.
impliedly, by legislature or through legislative (RA 7000)
authority;
d. Duties must be performed independenUy Employee
without control of superior power other than A person in the service of govemmont 01 any of its
law; and · agencies, divisions, subdivisions, or instrumentalities.
e. Position must have some permanency. (1987 Administrative Code)
~------~----~--------------~----------------------------------------------------·
the Court of Appeals in connection with Section 3, Chapter
is dependent upon the pleasure of the
I of BP 129, as amended by RA 8246. In other words, the appointing power.
earlier the date of the commission of an appointee, the o Acquisition of civil service eligibility during
more senior he is over the other subsequent appointees. tenure of a temporary appointee does not
(Re: Seniority among the four most recent appointments to necessarily translate to permanent
the position of Associate Justices of the Court of Appeals, appointment. A new appointment which is
A.M. 10-4-22-SC, 2010) permanent is necessary. (Province of
Camarines Surv. CA, G.R. No.104639, 1995)
Modes and Kinds of Appointment o Power of Priesident to make temporary
General Rule: Acceptance of appointment is not appointment: The President may temporarily
necessary for the completion or validity of appointment. designate an officer already in the government
Exception: Acceptance is necessary to possession of service or any other competent person to
office, and to enable appointee to the enjoyment and perform the functions of an office in the
responsibility of an office. executive branch, appointment to which is
vested in him by law, when:
General Rule: An appointment to an office, once made 1. The officer regularly appointed to the
and complete, is !10t subject to reconsideration or office is unable to perform his duties by
revocation. reason of illness, absence or any other
Exception: An officer is removable at the will of the cause; or
appointing power. 2. there exists a vacancy
• Instances of Temporary Appointment
Acceptance may be express when it is done verbally 01· in 1. appointee does not possess civil service
writing. Acceptance is implied when, without formal eligibility
acceptance, the appointee enters upon the exercise of the 2. appointment by the President in an
duties and functions of an .office. executive office during the absence or
incapacity of the incumbent
KINDS OF APPOINTMENT 3. designation as officer in charge
4. appointment held at the pleasure of the
Kinds of Appointment under the Civil Service Law appointing power
1. Permanent appointments - Issued to a person who
meets all the requirements for the position to which he . 3. Regular Appol ntment - made by the President while
is being appointed, including the appropriate eligibility Congress is in session and becomes effective after the
prescribed, in accordance with the provisions of the nomination is confirmed by the Commission on
. laws, rules, and standards promulqated in pursuance Appointments.
thereof.
4. Provisional appointment - A person who has not
2. Temporary appointments - issued in the absence of qualified in an appropriate examination but who
any eligibles, when necessary to public interest, in otherwise meets the requirements for appointment to
.,,_. . ·~
order to fill a vacancy with a person who meets all the a regular position in the competitive service, whenever
requirements for the position to ·Nhich he/she is being a vacancy occurs and the filling thereof is necessary in
appointed, except the appropriate civil service the interest of the servlce and there is no appropriate
eligibility. register of eligibles at the time of appointment.
• Appointment in an acting capacity is merely
temporary, one which is good only until another 5. ~d Interim Appointment- it is made while Congress
appointment is made to take its place is not in session, before confirmation by the CA; it is
• Temporary appointments shall not exceed 12 immediately effective, and ceases to be valid if
months. disapproved or by-passed by the CA or until the next
o The appointee may be replaced sooner if a adjournment of the Congress.
qualified civil service eligible becomes
~~
~· l,
:.
available. 6. Midnight Appointment - made by the President or
'I._ ....} o Where a tempcrary appointee acquires civil acting president within 2 months immediately before
[ ... service eligibility during his tenure as such, the next presidential elections and up to the end of his
\,..) his temporary appointment does not thereby term, whether or not it is confirmed by the Commission.
automatically become permanent. What is
required is a new appointment.
o Temporary appointment given to a non-civil
''. ,· service eligible is without a definite tenure and
Officers that the President Shall Appoint: (E-MA2C- b. The Office of the Ombudsman.
JC2AR-NL2) c. Secretary of a Department
1. Heads of Executive departments d. Undersecretary of a Department
2. Ambassadors e. Chairman or Head of Bureaus of Offices
3. Other public Ministers and consuls f. Any GOCC
4. Officers of the Armed forces from the rank of colonel g. Any GOCC subsidiary ·
or naval captain 2. Under the Civil Service Decree, all appointments in the
5. Other officers whose appointment are vested in him in national, provincial, city, and municipal governments
the Constitution or in any branch or instrumentality, including GOCCs,
a. Regular members of the Judicial and Bar made in favor of the appointing or recommending
Council authority, or of the chief of the bureau of the office, or
b. The Chairman and Commissioners: of the Civil of persons exercising supervision over him, are
Service Cornmisslon prohibited. As used In the Civil Service Law, the term
c. The Chairman and Commissioners cf the "relative" and members of the family referred to those
COMELEC within the 3rd degree of consenquinlty or affinity.
d. The Chairman and Commissioners of the
Commission on Audit ' Exceptions: (CTAP)
e. Members of the Regional Oonsultatlve 1. Persons employed in Confidential capacity
Commission 2. Teachers
6. Officers whose appointments are Not otherwise 3. Physicians
provided for by law 4. Members of AFP
7. Officers whom the president may be authorized by Law
to appoint The restriction shall not be applicable to any member who,
8. Officers Lower in rank whose appointments the after his or her appointment to any position in an office or
Congress, by law, vested in the President bureau, contracts marriage with someone in the same
office or bureau. In this event, the employment or retention
Constitutional Limitations on the Presidential Power to therein of both husband and wife may be allowed.
Appoint:
1. Nepotism (see discussion and exceptions below) The mere issuance of appointment in favor of a relative
2. Midnight appointments within the third degree of consanguinity or affinity is
3. Those relating to an Acting President {Sections 13, 14 sufficient to constitute nepotism. Also, even if the case is
and 15 of Art. VII} one of falsification of public document, the requirement of
disclosure of relationship to the appointing power in the
The constitutional limitations refer to appointments in the local government units simply aims to ensure strict
executive and not the judicial branch of government. (De . enforcement of the prohibition against nepotism. {Galeos
Castro v. JBC, C.R. 191002, 2010) v. People, G.R. 174730-37, 2011)
Revocability of Appointment The rule on nepotism also applies to designations made in
General Rule: Appointment to an office once made and favor of a relative of the authority making a designation. A
completed, is not subject to reconsideration or revocation designation accomplishes the same purpose · as
because revocation after a complete appointment Is • appointment. (Laurel v. Civil Service Commission, G.R.
tantamount to removal. No. 71562, 1991)
.....
ATENEO CENTRAL
BAR OPERATIONS 2019 POLITICAL LAW
'., ..::
. ,;
ATENEO CENTRAL
BAR OPERATIONS 2019 POLITICAL LAW
Limits of the Alter Ego Doctrine order, uniformity, system and dispatch in public
There are certain powers that are reserved to the President business.
which cannot be exercised by the Secretaries of the -,
departments such as: As to the relationship of the officer to his subordinates
1. Declaration of Martial Law 1. Power of Control - power of an officer to manage,
2. Suspension of the privilege of writ of habeas corpus direct or govern, including the power to alter or modify
3. Pardoning Power; or set aside what a subordinate had done in the
4. Purely discretionary powers performance of his duties and to substitute his
judgment for that of the latter
2. Power of Supervision - it is the power of mere
Principle of Hold-Over oversight over an inferior body and does not include
In the absence of any express of implied constitutional or any restraining authority over such body. The officer
statutory provision to the contrary, the public officer is merely sees to it that rules are followed but he himself
entiUed to hold office untii his successor shall have been does not lay down such n.. les, nor does he have the
duly chosen and stiall have qualified.( Lecaroz v. discretion to modify or replace them.
Sandiganbayan, GR No 130872, March25, 1999)
ELIGIBILITY AND QUAI.IFICATION REQUIREMENTS
Effect when law fixes specific date for the end of a term
When the law fixes a specific date for the end of the term, Eligibility
there is an implied prohlhition against hold-over (Nueno v state of being legally fit to be chosen.
Angeles. GR no 89, Febn,ary 1, 1946)
Eligible
Nature of Officer during Hold-Over Under the Admln Code, it is used to refer to a person who
During the period of hold-over, the public officer is a de jure obtains a passing grade in a civil service examination and
officer (Bautista v Fajardo, GR No 1 ~799, September 23, whose name is entered in the regbter of eligibles from
1918) which appointments must be made. (ADMIN CODE, Book
V, TITLE 1-a, sEC.5, pAR. (8))
Classifications of Powers and Duties
As to their Nature Nature of right to hold Public Office
1. Ministerial - the law exacting its discharge prescribes The right to hold public office is not a natural right. It exists
and defines the time, mode and occasion of its only because and by virtue of some law expressly or
performance and requires neither judgment nor impliedly creating and conferring it.
discretion. This kind of duty is susceptible of
delegatton. The qualifications which relate to an office must be
2. Dtscretlonary-s- a public officer has the right to decide complied with by persons seeking that office. An election
how and when the duty sh,t1II be performed. A public or appointment to office of a person who is ineligible or
officer cannot delegate this kind of duty. unqualified gives him no right to hold the office. ',_
General Rule: Mandamus will not lie for the performance Qualification r :..
of a discretionary duty ·. . . ..
'\
Two Meaninas of Qualification: An officer who misrepresented his or her qualification, e.g.
·. educational attainment and eligibility for government
WHEN REFERRING TO
WHEN USED IN service, is guilty c,f plain and simple dishonesty as it refers
T~~ THE ACT OF ENTERING to the act of intentionally making a false statement on any
SENSE
INTO THE material fact in securing one's appointment. (Momongan v.
ENDOWMENTS,
OR PERFORMANCE OF THE Surnayo, A.M. No. P-10-2767, 2011)
QUALITIES
FUNCTIONS OF A
ATTRIBUTES
PUBLIC OFFICE All public officers and employees shall take an oath or
affirmation to uphold and defend the Constitution. (Phil.
The individual must Failure of an officer to
Const., art. IX-B, § 4)
possess the qualifications perform an act required by
at the time of appointment law could affect the Limits on Legislature's Power to Prescribe
or election and officer's title to the office.
Qualifica!ions:
continuously for as long as
1. The legislature may not reduce or increase the
the official relationship Note:
qualifications prescribed in an exclusive manner by the
continues. • Prolonged failure or
Constitution.
refusal to take the
2. The legislature may prescribe only general
Note: office coul :! result in
qualifications.
• Property qualiticatlons forfeiture of office. 3. The qualifications must be relevant to the office for
may not be imposed for • An oath of office taken which they are prescribed.
the exercise of the right before one who has no
to run for public office. authority to administer
Where a person is prohibited from holding two offices at
• Loss of any of the oath is no oath at all.
the same time, his appointment or election to a second
qualifications during • Once proclaimed and
office may operate to vacate the first or he may be ineligible
incumbency will be a duly sworn in office, a
for the second.
ground for termination. public officer is entitled
to assume office and to A person who accepts and qualifies for a second and
exercise the. functions
incompatible office is deemed to vacate, or by implication,
thereof. The penciency
to resign from the first office. The same rule obtains where
of an election protest is the holding of more than one position is prohibited by
not sufficient basis to
constitutional or statutory provision although the second
enjoin him from
position is not incompatible with the first.
assuming office.
In the absence of constitutional inhibition, Congress has
Formal Qualifications: (CAP CARES) the same right to provide disqualifications that it has to
1. Citizenship provide qualifications for office.
2. Age
3. Political affiliation Those Prescribe db>V the c ons tltI u ti on
4. Civil service examination
POSITION QUALIFICATIONS
5. Ability to read and write
· 6. Residence
1. A natural-born citizen of the
7. Education
Philippines
8. Suffrage
2. A registefed voter
3. Able to read and write
Only accountable public officers or those who are
. entrusted with the collection and custody of public money,
President and 4. At least 40 years of age on the
Vice President day of the election; and
and public ministerial officers whose actions may aff~ct the
rights and interests of individuals are required to grve an
5. A resident of the Philippines
for at least 10 years
official bond. ·
immediately preceding such
election.
Improper notarization is not among the grounds for
disqualification as stated under the OEC and ~GC. Apart
1. A natural-born citizen of the
from the qualific;ations provided for in the Constitution, ~he Philippines
power to prescribe additional qualiflcatlons for elective
2. On the day of the election, is at
.:.. ..•
\'
·
:':!
office and grounds for disqualification therefrom, Senators
least 35 years of age
consistent with the constitutional provisions, is vested in
3. Able to read and write
Conqress. (Amara v. COMELEC, G.R. 19228, 2011)
4. A registered voter; and
..
'• .:
Page 16~ of 320
'·· ;,
.l
ATENEO CENTRAL
BAR OPERATIONS 2019 POLITICAL LAW
ATENEO CENTRAL
BAR OPERATIONS 2019 POLITICAL LAW
10. Relationship with the appointing power an, agency performing quasi-judicial or administrative
11. Office Newly created or the emoluments of which have functions. (Phil. Const. art. VIII, § 12)
been increased · 4'.: No Member of a Constitutional Commission shall,
12. Grounds under the Local Government Code during his tenure, hold any other office or employment.
(Phil. Const. art. IX-A, § 2) The same disqualification
General Rule: Appointive and elective officials cannot hold applies to the Ombudsman and his deputies. (Phil.
multiple employment or office during their tenure. Const. art. XI, § 8)
5. The Ombudsman and his Deputies shall not be
Exception: Appointive officials may hold other office when qualified to run for any office in the election
allowed by law or by the primary functions of their immediately succeeding their cessation from office.
positions. (Sec 7, Art IX-8) (Phil. Const. art. XI, § 11)
6. Members of Constitutional Commissions, the
Exception to holding multiple offices: Ombudsman and his deputies must not have been
1. Those provided for under the Constitution, such as: Candidates for any elective position in the elections
a. President as head of NEDA (Art XII, Sec. 9) immediately preceding their appointment. (Phil. Const.
b. · VP may be appointed as Cabinet Member (Art art. IX-8, IX-C, IX-0, §. 1; art. XI, § 8)
VII, Sec. 3) 7. Members of the Constitutional Commissions, the
c. VP as Acting President (Art VII, Sec. 7) (;mbudsman and his deputies are appointed to a term
d. In and ex-officio capacity (CLU v. Exec. Sec.• of soven (7) years, without reappointment. {Phil.
G.R. No.83896, 1991)and Const. art. IX-8, § 1 (2); art. IX-C, § 1 (2); Art. IX-D, §.
2. Posts occupied by Executive officials specified in 1 (2); art. IX, §11)
Section 13, Article VII without addltlonal compensation 8. The spouse and relatives by consanguinity or affinity
in ex officio capacities as provided by law and as within the fourth civil degree of the President shall not
required by the primary functions of the officials' during his tenure be appointed as Members of the
offices. (Funa v. Agra, G.R. 191644, 2013) Constitutional Commissions, or the Office of the
Ombudsman. or as Secretaries, Undersecretaries,
Genaral Disqualifications under the Constitution: chairmen or heads of bureaus or offices, including
1. No candidate who lost in an election shall, within one government-owned or controlled corporations (Phil.
year after such election, be appointed to any office in Const.art. VII,§ 13, Art. VII}
Government. (Phil. Const. art. IX-B, §VI)
2. No elective official shall be eligible for appointment or PD 807, Sec. 49 prohibits the appointment of a Senator or
designation in any capacity to any public office or Congressman to any office which may hove been created
position during his tenure. (Phil. Const., art. IX-B, § or emoluments thereof increased during the term tor which
7(1)) he was elected.
3. Unless otherwise provided by law or by the primary
functions of his position, no appointive official shall When the Constitution has attached a disqualification to
hold any other position in Government. (Phil. Const., the holding of any offlce,Congress cannot remove it under
art. IX-B, § 7(2)) the power to prescribe qualifications as to such offces as
it may create. The Constitution imposes limitations on the
Special Disqualifications under the Constitution: right of certain officials to hold more than one office at the
1 . The President, Vice-president, the Members of the same time.
Cabinet, and their deputies or assistants shall not, 1. The President, Vice President, Members of the
unless otherwise provided in the Constitution, hold any Cabinet, their deputies or assbtants shall not, unless
'v-• .) other office or employment during their tenure. (Phil. otherwise provided in the Constitution, hold any other
Const. art. VIII, §13) · office or employment during their tenure.
2. · No Senator or Member of the House of 2. A Senator or Member of the House of Representatives
Representatives may hold any other office or may not hold any office or employment in the
employment in the Government, or any subdivision, Government, or any subdivision, agency, or
agency or instrumentality thereof, including instrumentality, includ\ng GOCCS or their subsidiaries,
government-owned or controlled corporations or their during his term (not tenure) without forfeiting his seat.
subsidiaries, during hi~ term, without forfeiting his seat. 3. The members or the Supreme Court and of other
Neither shall he be appointed to any offlce which may courts established bylaw shall not be designated to
have been created or the emoluments thereof increase any agency performing quasi-judicial or administrative
during the term for which he was elected. (Phil. Const. functions.
art. VI,§ 13) 4. A member of the Constitutional Commission shall not,
3. The Members of the Supreme Court and of other during his tenure, hold any other office or employment.
courts established by law shall not be designated to 5. During their tenure, the Ombudsman and his deputies
are subject to the same disqualiticatlons and
Page 165 of 320
ATENEO CENTRAL
BAR OPERATIONS 2019 POLITICAL LAW
ATENEO CENTRAL
BAR OPERATIONS 2019 POLITICAL LAW
.)
ATENEO CENTRAL
BAR OPERATIONS 2019 POLITICAL LAW
The appointing authority has the discretion to fill the Proof of damage or actual injury
vacancy under the next-in-rank rule or by any other method Proof of damage or actual injury is not required for
authorized by law (e.g. by transfer). administrative liability to attach to a public officer. It is
enough that the act was contrary to the established norms
HOLD-OVER of conduct for government service. However, an employee
When a public officer's term has expired or his services are of GSIS who altered IP addresses without authority, not in
terminated, but he should continue holding his office until· the performance of his duties, will not be guilty of qrave
his successor is appointed or chosen And qualifies. misconduct but conduct prejudicial to the best interest of
service. To constitute misconduct. the act or acts must
RETIREMENT , have a direct relation to and be connected with the
Retirement has been defined as a withdrawal from office, performance of official duties. {GSIS v. Mayordomo, G.R.
public station, business, occupation, er public duty. It No. 191218, 2011)
involves bilateral act of the parties, a voluntary agreement '·
between the employer and the employee whereby the Presumption of good faith in the discharge of official
latter, after reaching a certain age, agrees and/or consents duties.
to sever his employment with the former. Retirement plans Every public official is entitled to the presumption of good
create a contractual obligation in which the promise to pay faith in the discharge of official duties. Although a public
benefits is made in consideration of the continued faithful officer is the final approving authority and the employees
service of the employee for the requisite period. Before a who processed the transaction were directly under his (
I
right to retirement benefits vests in an employee, he must · supervision, personal liabllity does not automatically attach v..
have met the stated conditions of eligibility with respect to to him but only upon those directly responsible for the
the nature of employment, age, and length of service. This unlawfOJI expendituras. {Dlmapilis-Baldoz v. Commission
c
'.. __,
sustained by another due to official acts done within the Election is not a mode. of condoning an administrative
scope of his authority. offense, and there is simply no constitutional or statutory
basis in our jurisd:ction to support the notion that an official
Exceptions: (BM-NID) elected for a different term is fully absolved of any
1. Bad faith; administrative liability arising from an offense done during
2. Malice; a prior term. {Carpio-Morales v. CA and Binay, G.R.
3. Negligence; 217126-27, 2015}
".,
4. Death or Injury to persons or damage to property ' '
Page 168 of 320
-------------- ... - .
ATENEO CENTRAL
BAR OPERATIONS 201!:J POLITICAL LAW
also the officer de facto, the lawful title and possession are
DE FACTO v DE JURE OFFICERS united.
De Jure Officer
One who has the lawful right to the office in all respects,
but who has either been ousted from it, or who has never
actually taken possession of it. When the officer de jure is
Page 169 of 320
.----··-·····-··
ATENEO CENTRAL
POLITICAL LAW
BAR OPERATIONS 2019
TERMINATION OF OFFICIAL RELATION the first office and his title is thereby
terminated without any other act . or
Modes of Termination: (TAD PAIR CAIRR) proceeding. Public policy considerations
1. Natural causes: (TAD) . dictate against allowing the same individual to
a. Expiration of the Term or tenure of office - perform inconsistent and incompatible duties.
his/her rights and duties ipso facto ceases, The incompatibility contemplated is not the
unless authorized to holdover. mere physical impossibility of one person's
b. Tenure represents the term during which the performing the duties of the two offices due to
incurnbent actually holds office. The tenure a lack of time or the inability to be in two places
may be shorter (or, in case of holdover, longer) at the same moment, but ~at which proceeds
than the term for reasons within or beyond the from the nature and relations of the two
power of the incumbent. However, a term, or positions to each other as to give rise to
the time during which the officer may claim to contrariety and antagonism should one person
hold the office as of right, is not affected t·y the attempt to faithfully and impartially discharge
holdover. (Valle Verde v. Africa, G.R. 151969, the duties of one toward the incumbent of the
2009) (See discussion on Part N. Term Limits) other. (Canonizado v. Aguirre, G.R. 133132,
c. Reaching the Age limit (retirement) - 65 years -, 2001).
for public officers and employees
d. Death or permanent disability d. Resignation - Formal renunciation or
relinquishment of office. To constitute a
2. Acts or neglect of officer: (PAIR) complete and operative act of resignation, the
a. Prescription of Right to Office - Quo officer or employee must show a clear
warranto is the proper remedy against a public intention to relinquish or surrender his position
officer or empioyee for his/her ouster from accompanied by the act of relinquishment.
office which should be commenced within 1 Resignation implies an expression of the
year after the cause of such ouster; otherwise incumbent in some form, express or implied,
the action shall be barred. of the intention to surrender, renounce and
relinquish the office, end its acceptance by
b. Abandonment of Office - the voluntary competent and lawful authority. A "courtesy
relinquishment of an office by the holder, with resignation" cannot properly be interpreted as
the intention of terminating his possession and resignation in the legal sense for it is not
control tnereof. There are, therefore, two necessarily a reflection of a public official's
essential elements of abandonment: first, an intention to surrender his position. Rather, it
intention to abandon and second, an overt or manifests his submission to the will of the
"external" act by which the intention is carried political authority and the appointing power.
into effect. (Ortiz v. COMELEC, G.R. 78957, 1988)
Generally, a person holding a public office Cessation from office by virtue of intervening / »
may abandon such office by nonuser or resignation did not warrant the dismissal of the ~- ..•-
d. Removal - ouster of the incumbent before the effected. (Biraogo v. The Philippine Truth Commission,
expiration of his/her term G.R. 192935-36, 2010).
Grounds:
i. Members of Congress - each House The extstence of any or some of the following
may punish its members for disorderly circumstances may be considered as evidence of bad faith
behavior with the concurrence of 2/3 in the removals made as a result of reorganization, giving
of ALL its members. Suspension if rise to a claim for reinstatement or reappointment by an
imposed shall not exceed 60 days .. aggrieved party:
ii. Civil Service Officers or Employees - 1. Where there is a significant increase in the number
for causes provided by law of positions in the new staffing pattern of the
department or agency conc:erned;
As a. matter of law, a department 2. Where an office is abolished and others are
secretary's decision confirming the performing substantially the same functions is
removal of an officer under his created;
authority is immediately executory, 3. Where incumbents are replaced by those less
even pending further remedy by the qualified in terms of status of appointment,
dismissed public officer. (Dimapilis- performance and merit;
Baldoz v. Commission on Audit, G.R. 4. Where there is a reclassification of offices in the
199114, 2013) department or agency concerned and the
e. Recall - refers to the election itself by means reclassified offices perform substantially the same
of which voters decide whether they should function as the original offices:
retain their local official or elect replacement. 5. Where the remov;,;I violates the order of separation
The ground for recall is "loss of confidence." provided In Section 3 hereof. (Cotiangco v,
Province ofBiliran, G.R. 157139, 2011)
A petitio,1 for recall should be initiated by at
least 25% of the total number of registered THE CIVIL SERVICE
voters of the concerned LGU.
Scope
Reorganization Civil Service Commission (CSC)
involves the reduction of personnel, consolidation of central personnel agency of the government.
offices, or abolitior. thereof by reason of economy or
redundancy of functions. It alters the existing structure of Composition
<»: government offices or units therein, including the lines of • Chairman and 2 comrnissloners
control, authority and responsibility between them to make • Appointed by the Presldent with consent of the
the bureaucracy more responsive to the needs of the Commission on Appointments for a term of 7
public clientele as authorized by law. It could result in the years, without reappointment.
loss of one's position through removal or abolition of an
office. A valid reorganization for the purpose of economy . Coverage of the Civil Service
or for making the bureaucracy more efficient must pass the All branches, subdivisions, instrumentalities, and agencies
test of good faith; otherwise it is void ab initio. (Pan v. Pena, of the government including GOCC with original charters.
G.R. 174244, 2009}
Authority of the Civil Service Commission
If the reorganization was done in good faith. the abolition 1. Limited to reviewing appointments on the basis of the
of positions, which resulted in loss of security of tenure of Civil Service Law.
affected government employees, would be valid. Except 2. Only allowed to check whether the appointee
those who hold constitutional offices, which provide for possesses the appropriate civil eligiuility or the
special immunity as regards salary and tenure, no one can required qualification. CSC has no discretionary
be said to have any vested right to an office or salary .. power.
(Banda v. Ermita, G.R. No. 166620, 2010)
t.imttatlons to the power to appoint
The creation of the Truth Commission does not fall within 1. The power does not include authority to make the
the President's power to reorganize. Section 31 of the appointment itself or to direct the appointing authority
Revised Administrative Code refers to reductlon of to change the employment status of an employee.
personnel, consolidation of offices, or abolition thereof by 2. No authority to revoke appointment simply because it
reason of economy or redundancy of functions. These ' believed that another person is better qualified.
refer to situations where a body or an office is already 3. No power to pass upon the qualifications or tenure of
,, 1 existent but a modification or alteration thereof has to be t.he appointing officer or declare the latter's position
vacant for an act that produced forfeiture of his office.
' 1
:... .i Page 171 of 320
ATENEO CENTRAL
BAR OPERATIONS 2019 POLITICAL LAW
4. Cannot change the tenure of office grantt·i to 3. In the case of appointment by transfer,
appointee such as where the appointing authority reinstatement, or by original appointment, that the
indicated permanent appointment but CSC approved protestant is not satisfied with the written special
as temporary such appointment. -, reasonts) given by the appointing authority.
'---------------- ----- ..
ATENEO CENTRAL
BAR OPERATIONS 2019 POLITICAL LAW
Good Faith
ACCOUNTABILITY OF PUBLIC OFFICERS Good faith is ordinarily used to describe that state of mind
denoting honesty of intention and freedom from knowledge
DISCIPLINE of circumstanr.es which ought to put the holder upon
Grounds for Discipline: (0000 IPOD MINI MUG) inquiry. In other words, good faith is actually a question of
1. Discourtesy in the course of official duties; intention. Although this ,is something internal, one can
2. Refusal to perform Official duty or render overtime ascertain a person's intention not from his own protestation
service; of good faith, which is self-serving, but from evidence of his
3. Falsification of Official documents; conduct and outward acts. (Dumduma v. CSC, G.R.
~~--
r '
4. Habitual Drunkenness; 182606,2011)
5. lne:fficlency and incompetence in the performance of
official duties; Every public official who signs or initials documents in the
6. Willful refusal to Pay just debts or willful failure to pay course of standard operating procedures does not
taxes due to the ~overnment; automatically become a conspirator in a crime that
7. Oppression; transpired at some stage in which the official had no
8. Dishonesty: participation. (Peralta v. Desierto, G.R. 15315.'2, 2005)
'. ;;
F· ..,' 9. Misconduct;
..- . 10. Disgraceful and Immoral conduct; Even if the dishonest act was committed by the employee
-:: .•..;.' 11. Neglect of duty; prior to entering government service, such act is still a
12 .. Physical or mental Incapacity due to immoral or ground for disciplinary action. (Orbase v, Ombudsman,
vicious habits; G.R. 175115,2009)
13. Conviction of a crime involving Moral turpitude;
14. Being notoriously Undesirable; Misconduct in office .
·~:_ ..:~ 15. Gambling. refers to "any unlawful behavior by a public officer in
.,
·........
lo
.
fl
relation to the duties of his office, wil:ful in character. The
term embraces acts which the office holder had no right to
perform, acts performed improperly, and failure to act in
:~ ;
·- ...· the face of an affirmative duty to act." In grave misconduct,
as distinguished from simple misconduct, the elements of
Page 173 of 320
·----·-·----------------------------------·
. ··-··· .. ·---------------
ATENEO CENTRAL
BAR OPERATIONS 2019 POLITICAL LAW
corruption, clear intent to violate the law, or flagrant Ultra vlres acts
disregard of established rule must be manifest. Corruption acts which are dearly beyond the scope of one's authority.
as an element of grave misconduct consists in the act of They are null and void and cannot be given any effect. The
an official or employee who unlawfully or wrongfully uses doctrine of estoppal cannct operate to give effect to an act
his station or character to procure some benefit for himself which is otherwise null and void or ultra vires. (Acebedo
or for another, contrary to the rights of others. (Gabon v. Optical Company v. CA, G.R. No. 100152, 2000)
Merka, A.M. P-11-3000, 2011)
Jurisdiction in Disciplinary Cases
Grave misconduct 1. Heads of ministries, agencies and instrumentalities,
consists in a government official's deliberate violation of a . provinces, cities and municipalities have jurisdiction to
rule of law or standard of behavior. It is regarded as grave investigate and decide matters ir.volv:ng disciplinary
when the elements of r::orruption, clear intent to violate the action against officers and err.ployees under their
law, or flagrant disregard of established rules are present. jurisdiction.
In particular, corruption as an element of grave misconduct 2. Decision final in case the penalty imposed is
consists in the official's unlawful and wrorigful use of his suspension of not more than 30 days or fine in an
station or character to procure some benefit for himself or amount not exceeding 30 days salary.
for another person, contrary to duty and the rights of 3. Other cases, decision shall be initially appealed to the
others. Rigging by a public official at a bidding in the department head and finally to the Civil Service· .
organization where he belongs is a specie of corruption. Commission and pending appeal, shall be executory
(NPC v. CSC, G.R. 152093, 2012) EXCEPT when the penalty is removal, in which case it
shall be executory only after confirmation by the
Simple neglect of duty department · head.
defined as the failure of an emptoyee to give proper Committee to hear administrative charge against
attention to a required task or to discharge a duty due to public school teacher representative of the teacher's·
carelessness or indifference. On the other hand, gross organization
neglect of duty is characterized by want of even the 4. Civil Service Commission has appellate jurisdiction.
slightest care, or by consclous indifference to the. Case may be filed directly to it; it may decide on the
consequences, and in cases involving public officials, by case or deputize a department or agency
flagrant and palpable breach of duty. Jt is the omission of
that care that even inattentive and thoughtless men never Preventive Suspension and Back Salaries
fail to take on their own property. (Land Bank of the
Philippines vs. San Juan Jr., G.R. 192890, 2013) PREVENTIVE SUSPENSION
Merely a preventive measure, a preliminary step in an
When demolition Is proper and when Improper that administrative investigation. The purpose of the
may constitute liabllit :
~ .......~..,....~~~~~~~~ ....... suspension order is to prevent the accused from using his
WHEN DEMOLITION IS WHEN DEMOUTION IS position and the powers and prerogativeo of his office to
PROPER NOT PROPER influence potential witnesses or tamper with records which
may be vital in the prosecution of the case against him. If
(
A complaint for damages If a Sanggunian resolution after such Investigation, the charge Is established and the
and injunction against the only authorized a Mayor to person investigated is found guilty of acts warranting his ·
members of the Philippine file for unlawful detainer in suspension or removal, then, as a penalty, he is
army cannot be held case of resistance to obey suspended, removed or dismissed. (Villasenor v.
personally accountab!e for the order or to demolish Sandiganbayan, G. R. No. 180700, 2008)
\.... ...
the demolition since the the building using legal
act was done in means, the act of Two kinds of preventive suspension of government
connection with their demolition without legal employees charged with offenses punishable by
official duties in carryinq order is not proper. After removal or suspension:
the AFP prograrn of "Oplan all, the present Local 1. Preventive suspension pending invesug·ation; and i '
Lin is." There was no Government Code does 2. Preventive suspension pending appeal if the penalty
showing that such acts not expressly provide for imposed by the disciplining authority is suspension or
constitute ultra vires acts the abatement of diamtssal and, after review, the respondent is
nor was there a showing of nuisance. (Asilo v. People exonerated.
bad faith on the part of of the Philippines, r:;.R.
petitioners. (Philippine 159017-18, 2011)
Army, 5th Infantry Division
v, Spouses Pamittan, et. '
et., G.R. 187326, 2011)
Page 174 of 320 ~ ,,.;;.
;
ATENEO CENTRAL
BAR OPERATIONS 2019 POLITICAL LAW
Effect of Decision on Suspension When Made Before GROUNDS FOR PREVENTIVE SUSPENSION OF
or Aft er 90 D ays: POLICE OFFICERS [RA 8551, SEC. 55] (Preventive
Suspension Pending Crimlnal Case)
IF THE CASE IS IF THE CASE 15 The court shall immediately suspend the accused from
DECIDED BEFORc 9() DECIDED NOT DECIDED
office for a period not exceeding 90 days from arraignment:
DAYS WITHIN 90 DAYS
1. Upon the filing of a complaint or information sufficient
in form and substance against a member of the PNP;
The suspension will last The suspension may not 2. For grave felonies where the penalty imposed by law
less than 90 days. exceed the maximum is 6 years and 1 day or more.
period of 90 days.
Exception: If it can be shown by evidence that the
Preventive suspension is merely a preventive measure, a accused is harassing the complainant and/or witnesses,
preliminary step in an administrative investigation; the the court may order the preventive suspension of the
purpose thereof is to prevent the accused from using his accused PNP member even if the charge is punishable by
position and the powers and prerogatives of his office to ·. a penalty lower than 6 years and 1 day.
influence potential witnesses or tamper with records which
may be vital in the prosecution of the case against him. General Rule: The period of preventive suspension shall
(Ombudsman v. Franctsco, G.R. 172553, 20·11) not b~ more than 90 days.
lt is now settled that Sec. 13 of Repul:)lic Act No. 3019 Exception: If the delay in the disposition of the case is due
makes it mandatory for the Sandiganbayan to suspend any to the fault, negligence or petitions of the respondent.
public official against whom a valid information charging
violation of that law, Book II, Title 7 of the Revised Penal The preventive suspension may be socner lifted by the
Code, or any offense involving fraud upon government or court in the exigency of the service upon recommendation
public funds or property is filed. The court trying a case has of the chief, PNP. Such case shall be subject to continuous
neither discretion nor duty to determine whether preventive trial and shall be terminated within 90 days from
suspension is required to prevent the accused from using arraignment of the accused.
his office to intimidate witnesses or frustrate his
prosecution or continuing committing malfeasance in Back salaries during preventive suspension
office. (Villasenor v. Sandiganbayan, G.R. 180700, 2008) General Rule: A public official is not entitled to any
compensation if he has not rendered any service. (Reyes
There is no dispute as to the power of the Ombudsman to v. Hernandez, G.R. No. Apr. 8, 1941)
place a public officer charged with an administrative
offense under preventive suspension. That power is clearly Two conditions before an employee may be entitled to
confined under Section 24 of R.A. No. 6770. The law sets back salaries in preventive suspension cases:
forth two conditions that must be satisfied to justify the 1. The employee must be found innocent of the charges;
issuance of an order of preventive suspension pending an and
investigation, to wit: 2. His suspension must be unjustified or the official was
.· ...
, __..,,,
1. The evidence of guilt is strong; and\ innocent. (CSC v. Cruz, G.R. 187858, 2011)
2. Either the following circumstance co-existing with the
first requirement: The reasoning behind these conditions runs this way:
a. The charge involves dishonesty, oppression or although an employee is considered under preventive
grave misconduct or neglect in the performance of suspension during the pendency of a successful appeal,
...:,_:.; duty; the law itself only authorizes preventive suspension for a
b. The charge would warrant removal from the fixed period; hence, his suspension beyond this fixed
service; or · period ls unjustified and must be compensated. The rule
- ;'
c. The respondent's continued stay in office may on payment of back salaries during the period of
prejudice the case filed against him. (Ombudsman suspension of a member of the civil service who is
v. Valeroso, G.R. 167828, 2007) subsequently ordered reinstated, is already settled in this
jurisdiction. Such payment of salaries corresponding to the
Prior notice ar.d hearing are not required in the period when an empioyee is not allowed to work may be
issuance of" preventive suspension order. decreed not only if he is found innocent of the charges that
Settled is the rule that prior notice and hearing are not caused his suspension (Sec. 35, RA 2260), but also when
· required in the issuance of a preventive suspension order. the suspension ls unjustified. {CSC v. Cruz, G.R. 187658,
"t ... .
.,..
(Carabeo v. CA, G.R. 178000/178003, 2009) 2011).
The mere reduction of the penalty on appeal does not charge against them. (TanJay Water District v. Quinit, Jr.,
entitle a government employee to back salaries if he was G.R. 160502,2007)
not exonerated of the charge against him. If the
exoneration of the employee is relative (as distinguished When an official or employee was illegally dismissed and
from complete exoneration), an inquiry Into the factual his reinstatement has later been ordered, for all legal·
premise of the offense charged and of the offense purposes he is considered as not having left his office. ·
committed must be made. If the administrative offense Therefore, he is entitled to all the rights and privileges that
found to have been actually commitled is of lesser gravity accrue to him by virtue of the office he held. (Galang v.
than the offense charged, the employee cannot be Land Bank, G.R. 175276, 2011)
considered exonerated if the , factual premise for the
imposition of the lesser penalty remains the same. (CSC v. A public officer is not entitled to. reinstatement and back
Cruz, G.R. No. 187858, 2011). salaries, when removal or suspension is lawful. The denial
of salary to an employee during the period of his
Preventive Suspension Pending Investigation v. suspension, if he should later be found guilty, is proper
Aooeal because he had given ground for his suspension. It does
not impair his constitutional rights because the Constitution
PREVENTIVE PREVENTIVE
itself allows suspension for cause as provided by law and
SUSPENSION PENDING SUSPENSION PENDING
the law provides that an employee may be suspended
INVESTIGA 1"10N APPEAL
pending an investigation or by way of penalty. (Bangalisan
Not a penalty. It is a
v. CA, G.R. 124678, 1997)
If the penalty imposed by
measure intended to the disciplining authority is
enable the disciplining A public officer is entitled after his acquittal not only to
suspension or dismissal
authority to investigate reinstatement but also to payment cf the salaries,
and, after review, the
charges against allowances, and other benefits withheld from him by
respondent is exonerated.
respondent by preventing reason of his discharge from the service even if there has
the latter from intimidating been valid suspension from the service pending the
No back salaries shall be
or in any way influencing adjudication of the criminal case. (P/Chief Superintendent
due for the period of
witnesses against him. If Calinisan v. SP02 Roaquin, G.R. 159588, 2010)
preventive suspension
the investigation is not PENDING
finished and a decision is
R'emsta t ement v. Bac kwaQ es:
INVESTIGATION but only
not rendered within that for the period of preventive REINSTATEMENT eACKWAGES
period, the suspension will suspension Pt:NDING
be lifted and the APPEAL, in the event the Restoration to a state or A form Of relief that
respondent will employee is exonerated. condition from which one restores the income that
automatically be ( Gloria v. CA, G.R. had been removed or was lost by ·reason of
reinstated. If after 131012, 1999) separated. One who is unlawfu' dismissal.
Investigation, respondent reinstated assumes the
is found innocent of the position he had occupied
charges and is prior to the dismissal and
'
·~
.
ATENEO CENTRAL
BAR OPERATIONS 2019 POLITICAL LAW
Exceptions: when liability does not devolve ultimately to Who may be impeached: (VP-SOC)
the State such as: 1. President
1. A petition to require official to do his duty; 2. Vice President
2. A petition to restrain him from doing an act; 3. Supreme Court Justices
3. To recover taxes from him; 4. Constitutional Commission members
4. Those where the officer impleaded may by himself 5. Ombudsman
alone comply with the decision of the court;
5. Where the government itself has violated its own laws. Grounds: (GOT BBC)
1. Graft and corruption
Where a public officer has committed an ultra vlres act, or 2. Other high crimes
where there is a showing of bad faith, malice or gross 3. Treason
negligence, the officer can be held personally accountable 4. Betrayal of public trust
even if such acts are claimed to have been performed in 5. Bribery
connection with official duties. (Wylie v, Rarang, G.R. 6. Culpable violation of the Constitution
74135, 1992)
It Is an exclusive list. Congress cannot add to the list
Immunity from sult cannot institutionalize irresponsibility of impeachable offenses.
and non-accountability nor gri:int a privileged status not
claimed by any other official of the Republic. (Republic v. These officers cannot be charged in court with offenses
Sandoval, G.R. 84607, 1993) that have removal from office as penalty. But after an
offici.:il has been impeached, he can be charged with the
Where the public officer is sued in his personal capacity, appropriate offense.
state immunity will not apply. (Lansang v. CA, G.R.
102667, 2000) . Resignation by an impeachable official does not place him
beyond the reach of impeachment proceedings; he can still
CONDONATION DOCTRINE be impeached.
The condonation doctrine is the doctrine that provides that
a reelected official should no longer be made accountable Other public officers and employees -
for an administrative offense committed during his previous They may be removed from office as provided by law but,
·~.· term. not by impeachment.
BERNABE: In Carpio-Morales, the Court abandoned the Who may initiate Impeachment case
"condonation doctrine," explaining that "election is not a The House of Representatives has exclusive power to
mode of condoning an administrative offense, and there is initiate all cases of impeachment.
simply no constitutional or statutory basis in our Jurisdiction
to support the notion that an official elected for a different Procedure:
term is fully absolved of any administrative liability arising 1. Filing of verified complaint. Can be filed by:
·,
\,, ,.r
. from an offense done during a prior term." a. Any member of the House of Representatives
b. Any citizen upon a resolution or endorsement by
The abandonment should be prospectively applied. any Member of the House
(Dimapilis v. Commission on Elections, G.R. No. 227158, c. By at least 1/3 of all the Members of the House of
[April 18, 2017)) Representatives
d. If the verified complaint or resolution of
impeachment was filed by at least 1/3 of all the
·,
:.....
r
)'
Members of the House, it shall constitute the
Articles of Impeachment. Trial in the Senate shall
proceed.
1. Inclusion of complaint in the order of business Upper House. (Gutierrez v. House Committee on Justice,
within 10 session days · .G.~.193459, 2011).
2. Referral to proper Committee within 3 session
days thereafter Effects of impeachment: (LOR)
3. Submission of committee report to the House 1. Removal from office of the official concerned
together with corresponding resolution 2. Disqualification to hold any office
4. The report should be submitted within 60 days 3. Officer still Liable to prosecution, trial, and punishment
from referral, after hearing, and by a majority vote if the impeachable offense committed also constitutes
of all its members. . a felony or crime.
5. Calendaring of resolution for consderatlon by the
House The determination of sufficiency of fotm and substance of
6. Should be done within 10 session days. from an impeachment complaint is an exponent of the express
receipt thereof constitutional grant of rule-making powers or the House of
7. Vote of at least 1/3 of all the members of the Representatives. In the discharge of that power and in the
House necessary to: exercise of its discretion, the House has formulated
a. Affirm a favorable resolution with the Articles · determinable standards as to the form and substance ot an
of Impeachment of the Committee or impeachment complaint. Furthermore, the Impeachment
b. To override its contrary resolution Rules are clear in echoing the constitutional requirements
and providing that there must be a "verified complaint or
Roles of the 3 branches of Government in resolution," and that the substance requirement is met if
impeachment: there is "a recital of facts constituting the offense charged
1. Senate has sole power to try and decide cases of and determinative of the jurisdiction of the committee."
impeachment; . Questions on what constitutes as an impeachable offense
2. If the President is on trial, the Chief Justice presides are considered to be purely political questions and thus left
but does not vote; to the sound determination of the legislature. (Gutierrez v.
3. The Supreme Court can determine it' Congress House Committee on Justice, G.R. 193459, 2011).
committed grave abuse of discretion amounting t0 lack
or excess of jurisdiction (ex. recognizing two · THE OMBUDSMAN
impeachment complaints). i.
i Scope
For impeachment, judgment of conviction requires the GOCCs with original charters and those organized and
concurrence of 2/3 of all the Members of the Senate. incorporated under the Corporation Code within the
jurisdiction of the Sandiganbayan whenever they are
Only one impeachment proceeding should be initiated involved in qraft and corruption. (People v.
against an impeachable officer within a period of one year: Sandiganbayan, G.R. 147706-07, 2005).
(Gutierrez v, House Committee on Justice, G.R. 193459,
2011) · The Ombudsman has the power to grant immunity by itself
and even prior to the filing of information in court. RA 6770
f -
The SC found it well-within its power to determine whether fully recognizes this prosecutory prerogative by '
~ •. _>
Congress committed a violation of the Constitution or empowering the Ombudsman to grant immunity, subject to
gravely abused Its discretion in the exercise of its functions "such terms and conditions" as he may determine. The r
'\ .-J
and prerogatives that could translate as lack or excess of only textual limitation imposed by law on this authority is
jurisdiction in taking cognizance of two impeachmer.t the need to take "into account the pertinent provisions of ' ...:
complaints that are inquisitorial in function, akin to a the Rules of Court," - i.e., Section 17, Rule 119 of the \.,
preliminary investigation. (Gutierrez v. House Committee Rules of Court. The rule under RA 6770 clarifies that in ( ">
on Justice, G.R. 193459, 2011). cases already filed with the courts, the prosecution merely ....
'·.:.
ATENEO CENTRAL
BAR OPERATIONS 2019 POLITICAL LAW
In the exercise of his duties, the Ombudsman is giv13n full agencies or instrumentalities, including GOCCs or
administrative disciplinary authority. His power is not their subsidiaries.
limited merely to receiving, processing complaints, or
recommending penalties. He is to conduct investigations, Appointment:
hold hearings, summon witnesses and require production 1. Ombudsman and deputies
of evidence and place respondents under preventive 2. By the president from a list of at least 6 nominees
suspension. This includes the power to impose the penalty prepared by the Judicial and Bar Council. Vacancies
of removal, suspension, demotion, fine, or censure of a will be filled from a list of 3 nominees.
public officer or employee. The provisions in RA 6770 3. Appointments do NOi• require confirmation
taken together reveal ihe manifest intent of the lawmakers 4. All vacancies shall be filled within 3 months after they
to bestow on the Office of the Ombudsman full occur.
administrative disciplinary authority. These provisions 5. Appointees have 7-year term without reappointment
cover the entire gamut of administrative adjudication which and are not quallfled to run for any office in the election
entails the authority to, inter alia, receive complaints, succeeding their cessation from office.
conduct investigations, hold hearings in accordance with 6. Other ombudsman officials and employees
its rules of procedure, summon witnesses and require the a. By the Ombudsman
production of documents, place under preventive b. In accordance with Civil Service Law
suspension public officers and employees pending an
investigation, determine the appropriate penalty imposable Functions
on erring public officers or employees as warranted by the Powers, Functions and Duties
evidence, and, necessarily, Impose the said penalty. Thus, 1. Investigate on its own, or on complaint by any person,
it is settled that the Office of the Ombudsman can directly any act or omission of any public official, employee,
impose administrative sanctior.s. (Cabalit v. COA, G.R. office or agency, when such act or omission appears
180236, 2012) to be illegal, unjust, improper, or inefficient.
a. May be done on its own initiative or on complaint
The Office of the Ombudsman is tasked to exercise in any form.
disciplinary authority over all elective and appointive b. Such may be delegated.
officials, save only for lmpeachable officers. (Alejandro v. c. The power to investigate includes the power to
Office of the Ombudsman Fact-Finding and Intelligence impose preventive suspension. But, this is not a
Bureau, G.R. 173121, 2013). penalty.
d. Investigate does not mean preliminary
Composition: investigation.
1. OmbudsmanfTanodbayan; e. The complaint need not be drawn up in the usual
2. Overall Deputy (at least one Deputy each for Luzon, form.
Visayas and Mindanao). f. The illegal act or omission need not be in
3. Deputy for military establishment may be appointed connection with the duties of the public officer or
employee concerned.
Qualifications: (Ombudsman and Deputies): g. ANY illegal act may be investigated by the
1. Natural born citizen of the Philippines Ombudsman. In this regard, the Ombudsman's
2. At least 40 years old at time of appointment jurisdiction is concurrent with that of the regular
3. Of recognized probity and independence prosecutors.
4. Member of the Philippine bar -, 2. Direct, upon complaint or at its own instance, any
5. Must not have been candidate for any electlve office in public official or employee of the government, or any
the immediately preceding election r.ubdlvision. agency or instrumentality thereof, as well
6. For Ombudsman: He must have been for 10 years or as of any GOCC with original charter, to perform and
more: expedite any act of duty required by law, or to stop,
a. A judge OR prevent and correct any abuse or impropriety in the
b. Engaged in the practice of law in the Philippines performance of duties.
a. The Ombudsman has persuasive. power, and may
r •.. Disqualifications and Prohibitions:
:-.
; require that proper legal stops are taken by the
1. Cannot hold any other ofi'ice or employment during his officers concerned.
tenure; b. The public official or employee must be employed
2. Cannot engage in the practice of any profession or in in:
the active management or control of any business i. The Government
~.......!- which may be affected by the functions of his office; ii. Any subdivision, agency, or instrumentality
3. Cannot be financially interested, directly or indirectly, iii. GOCCs with original charters
in any contract with or in any franchise or privilege c. The Special Prosecutor may prosecute before the
granted by the Government, any of its subdivisions, Sandiganbayan, judges accused of gmft and
Page 179 of 320
ATENEO CENTRAL
POLITICAL LAW
BAR OPERATIONS 2019
corruption. even If they are under the Supreme of the concerned officer or agency to implement the
Court. penalty imposed. This power to impose administrative
3. Direct the officer concerned to take the appropriate liability is not merely recommendatory but actually
action against a public official or employee at fault, and mandatory. (Ombudsman v. Delijero, G.R. 172635,
recommend his removal, suspension, demotion, fine, 2010).
censure, or prosecution, and ensure compliance 3. The enumeration of the powers of the Ombudsman in
therewith. the Constitution is not exclusive. Congress may add
a. The Ombudsman does not himself prosecute additional powers. The Ombudsman Act grants to the
cases against public officers or employees. Ombudsman fuller authority; he has the power to
b. Final say to prosecute still rests in the executive impose the penalty of suspension. (Ombudsman v.
department. CA, G.R. 160675, 2006).
c. The Ombudsman or Tanodbayan may use . 4. The doctrine of qualified political agency does not
mandamus to compel the fiscal to prosecute. apply to the relationship between the Ombudsman and
d. The refusat by any officer without just cause to the Special Prosecutor. The Special Prosecutor may
comply with an order of the Ombudsman to only file an information only when authorized by the
remove, suspend, emote, flne, censure, or Ombudsman. (Perezv. Sandiganbayan, G.R. 166062,
prosecute an officer or employee who is at fault or > 2006).
who neglects to perform an act or discharge a duty 5. In administrative case involving the concurrent
required by law shall be a ground for disciplinary jurisdiction of two or more disciplining authorities, the
action against said officer. (RA 6770, Sec. 15 (3); body in which the complaint is filed first, and which opts
Ledesma v. CA, G.R. No. 161629, 2005; Article 11 to take cognizance of the case, acquires jurisdiction to
Sec. 13(3), 1987 Constitution) tne exclusion of other tribunals exercising concurrent
4. Direct the officer concerned, in any appropriate case, jurisdiction. In this case, since the complaint was filed
and subject to such limitations as may be provided by first in the Ombudsman, and the Ombudsman opted to
law to furnish it with copies of documents relating to assume jurisdiction over the complaint, the
contracts or transactions entered into by his office Ombudsman's exercise of jurisdiction is to the
involving the disbursement or use of public funds of. exclusion of the Sangguniang Bayan exercising
properties, and roport any irregularity to COA for concurrent jurisdiction. Jurisdiction could no longer be
appropriate action transferred to the Sanggunlang Bayan by virtue of a
5. Request any government agency for assistance and subsequent complaint filed by the same complainants.
intormation necessary in the discharge of its (Ombudsman vs. Rodriquez, G.R. 172700, 2010).
responsibilities, and to examine, if necessary, 6. The Office of the Ombudsman shall have disciplinary
pertinent records and documents and public matters authority over all elective and appointive officials of the
covered by its investigation when circumstances so Government and its subdivisions, instrumentalities and
warrant and with due process. agencies, including Members of the Cabinet, local
6. Determine tile cause of mismanagement, inefficiency, government. governmant-owned or controlled
red tape, fraud and corruption in the government and corporations and their subsidiaries. except over
make recommendations for their elimination and the officials who may be removed only tiy impeachment or
observance of hign standards of ethics and efficiency. over Members of Congress, and the Judiciary. (RA r·
7. Promulgate its rules of procedure and exercise such 7660, sec. 21) However, he Office of the Ombudsman
(
other powers or perform such functions or duties as shall have the power to investigate any serious
may be provided by law. misconduct in the office allegedly committed by '·'
officials removable by impeachment, for the purpose
The Office of the Ombudsman enjoys fiscal autonomy. of filing a verified complaint for impeachment if
Its approved annual appropriations should be warranted. (RA No. 6770, Sec. 22)
automatically and regularly released. 7. An administrative complaint filed against a public
officer before the Ombudsman does not bar an
Doctrines: administrative investigation before the Presidential
1. The Ombudsman has juri15diction over disciplinary Anti-Graft Commission. The jurisdiction of
cases against government employees, which includes Ombudsman over administrative complaints are not
public school teachers. However, Section 9 of the exclusive, it may be exercised concurrently with an
Magna Carta for Public School Teachers provides that authorized agency. (Lacson v. Executive Secretary,
'~.....,
it must first go to a committee appointed by the G.R. 165399, 201 ~ ).
Secretary of Education. (Ombudsman v. Estandarte, 8. Appeals from decisions of the Ombudsman in
'.. ,
G.R. 168670, 2007). administrative cases do not stay the execution of the
2. The Office of the Ombudsman has the authority to penalty imposed. This is in accordance with Section 7
determine the administrative liability of an erring public Rule Ill of the Rules of Procedure of the Ombudsman
official or employee, and to direct and compel the head which explicitly states that an appeal shall not stop the
Page 130 of 320
ATENEO CENTRAL
BAR OPERATIONS 2019 POLITICAL LAW
decision from being executory. No vested right is arraignment of the accused or that the motion was filed
violated because pending appeal the appellant is after a reinvestigation. (City of Tuguerarao v, Ting,
considered as preventively suspended and will be paid .G.R. 192435-3, 2011 ).
backwages in case he wins in his appeal In addition, 14. The power of the Office of the Ombudsman to
under Section 13(8) Article XI of the Constitution investiyate extends to all kinds of malfeasance,
authorizes the Ombudsman to formulate its own rules. misfeasance, and non-feasance that have been
(Facura et al. v. CA, et al., G.R. 166495, 2011 ). committed during his tenure of office by any officer or
9. Section 20 of RA 6770 is merely directory and does employee of the Government, or of any subdivision,
not prohibit the Ombudsman from conducting an agency or instrumentality thereof, including
administrative investigation after the lapse of one year, government-owned or controlled corporations. (Office
reckoned from the time the alleged act was committed. of the Ombudsman v. De Leon, G.R. 154083, 2013).
Without doubt. even if the administrative case was filed 15. A preliminary investigation partakes of an investigative
beyond the one (1) year period stated in Section 20(5), or inquisitorial power for the sole purpose of obtaining
the Ombudsman was well withir, its discretion to information on what future action of a judicial nature
conduct the administrative investigation. (Ombudsman may be taken. Even the action of the Secretary of
v. Andutan, G.R. 16467.9, 2011). Justice in reviewing a prosecutor's order or resolution
10. Although the Ombudsman is not precluded by Section via appeal or petition for review cannot be considered
20(5) of RA 6770 from conducting the investigation, a quasi-judicial proceeding. Hence, Section 14, Artiere
the Ombudsman can no longer institute an VIII of the Constitution does not thus extend to
administrative case against a resigned public officer resolutions issued by the DOJ Secretary. (Bondoc v.
because the latter was not a public servant at the time Tan nong, G.R. No. 186652, 2::>10).
the case was filed. (Ombudsman v. Andutan, G.R. 16. The second paragrar1h of Section 14 of RA 6770 Is
164679,2011). ' declared invalid, and as such, the CA may Impose
11. Findings of fact by the Office of the Ombudsman when provisional injunctive writ over the implementation of
supported by substantial evidence are conclusive. Any prevention suspension order by the Ombudsman.
order, directive or decision Imposing the penalty of Furthermore, the independence granted to the
public censure or reprimand, suspension of not more Ombudsman by the Constitution means freedom from
than one (1) month's salary shell be final and control or supervision of the Executive Department,
unappealable. In the same vein, decision of the not the Judiciary. (Carpio-Morales v. CA, G.R. No.
Ombudsman absolving a public officer of an 217126-27, 2015)
administrative charge is final and unappea!able. 17. Under such terms and conditions as it may determine,
(Tolentino v, Atty. Roy Loyola et. al., G.R. 153809, taking into account the pertinent provisions of the
2011). Rules of Court, the Ombudsman may grant immunity
12. It isworth stressing that the Ombudsman's finding of from criminal prosecution to any person whose
probable cause does not touch on the issue of guill or testimony or whose possession and production of
innocence of the accused. It is not the function of the documents or other evidence may be necessary to
Office of the Ombudsman to rule on such issue. determine the truth in any hearing, inquiry or
Hence, Courts do not interfere in the Ombudsman's proceeding being conducted by the Ombudsman or
exercise of discretion In determining probable cause under its authority, in the performance or In the
unless there are compelling reasons. (Ganaden v. furtherance of its constitutional functions and statutory
Ombudsman, G.R. 170500/170510-11, 2011). objectives. The immunity granted under this and the
13. It is settled that the Office of the Ombudsman has the immediately preceding paragraph shall not exempt the
sole power to investigate and prosecute on its own or witness from cnrnlnal prosecution for perjury or false
on complaint by any person, any act or omission of any testimony nor shall he be exempt from demotion or
public of:icer or employee, office or agency, when such removal from office. (RA 6770, Sec. 17(2))
.• :
\· }. act or omission appears to be Illegal, unjust, improper
. or inefficient. The power to withdraw the Information Judicial Review in Administrative Proceedings and in
already filed is a mere adjunct or consequence of the P ena IP roce eel'mgs
Ombudsman's overall power to prosecute. However,
:f ~ while it is the Ombudsman whc has the full discretion ADMIN. PEN.~L
·-:, .;:
to determine whether or not a criminal case should be
filed in the Sandiganbayan, cnce the case has been Appeals from resolutions Supreme Court is not
1......:-. of the Office of the precluded from reviewing
filed with said court, it is the Sandiganbayan, and no
Ombudsman in the Ombudsman's action
, . longer the Ombudsman, which has full control of the
administrative disciplinary
~-_; case so much so that tt:e Information may not be when there is an abuse of
dismissed without the approval of said court. Further, cases should t:>e taken to discretion, in which case
it does not matter whether such filing of a motion to the Court of Appeals via Rule 65 of the Rules of
dismiss by the prosecution Is done before or after the Pel:tion for Review under Court. ( GE:rcla-Rueda v.
In the organization of the Office of the Ombudsman for Authority and Responsibllltles
filling up of positions therein, regional, cultural or ethnic • Shall be composed of the Special Prosecutor and
considerations shall be taken Into account to the end that his prosecution staff. The Office cf the Special
the Office shall be as much as possible representative of Prosecutor shall be an organic component of the
the regional, ethnic and cultural make-up of the Filipino Office of the Ombudsman and shall be under the
nation. supervision and control of the Ombudsman.
• It shall, under the supervision and control and
Qualifications upon the authority of the Ombudsman, have the
1. Natural born citizens of the Philippines, following powers:
2. At least forty (40) years old, 1. To conduct preliminary investigation and
3. Of recognized probity and independence, prosecute criminal cases within the jurisdiction of
4. Member of the Philippine Bar, the Sandiganbayan;
5. Must not have been candidates for any elective 2. To enter into plea bargaining agreements; and ',........
national or local office in the immediately preceding 3. To perform such other duties assigned to it by the
election whether regular or special. Ombudsman.
Term
The Special Prosecutor, shall serve for a term of seven (7) ... _;
years without reappointment.
Page 182 of 320
·-----------·-····- - . - .. -····-
ATENEO CENTRAL
BAR OPERATIONS 2019 POLITICAL LAW
.. '
..~ ...
• >
'
Administrative Law
TOPIC OUTLINE UNDER THE SYLLABUS
part of public law that fixes the organization and
determines the competence of administrative authorities
A. General principles
and indicates to the individual remedies for the violation of
B. Powers of administrative agencies
his rights (Nachura, Outline Reviewer in Political Law 493
· 1. Quasi-legislative (rule-making) power 2015). • '
a. Kinds of administrative rules and
regulations
Scope of Administrative Law - (FEG-CP-GRB)
b. Requisites for validity 1. Fixes the administrative organization and structure of
2. Quasi-judicial (adjudicatory) power the government.
a. Administrative due process ·
2. Executes or enforces that which is entrusted to
b. Administrative appeal and review
administrative authorities (all those public officers and
c. Administrative res judicata
organs of the government charged with amplification,
3. Fact-finding, investigative, licensing, and rate-
application, and execution of the law).
fixing powers
3. Governs public officers
C. Doctrines of primary jurisdiction and exhaustion
4. Creates administrative agencies
of administrative remedies
5. Provides the remedies to those aggrieved by these
agencies.
6. Governs judicial review
7. Includes Rules, regulations, orders and decisions
made by adminisfrative authorities.
8. Includes the Body of judicial decisions/doctrines on
any of the above.
Classification
As to source·
LAW THAT CONTROLS LAW MADE BY ADMIN.
ADMIN. BODIES AUTHORITIES
.:. E
Constitution, statutes, General regulations and
,: judicial decisions, E.O.s, particular determinations;
j
~·... } A.O.s, etc. constitutes delegations of
power embodied in
statutory administrative
law, and imposing and
constantly expanding body
of law.
'-----------------~··· -·-·--
..
·, ·.: ••I
ATENEO CENTRAL
BAR OPERATIONS 2019 POLITICAL LAW
ATENEO CENTRAL
BAR OPERATIONS 2019 POLITICAL LAW
Procedural
Express or Yes No . standard, mapping out the boundaries of the agency's
authority to which it must conform. The law must offer
Implied
a sufficient standard to specify the limits of the
Express or No No deleqate's authority, announce the legislative policy
Internal ' and specify the conditions under which it is to be
implied
implemented.
Penal Express Yes Yes
The two tests must concur. If one or both are absent,
any delegation that occurs is undue delegation of
legi&lative powers.
According to the Administrative Code, 3 copies of every
rule should be filed in the Office of the National Exceptions (To The Rule Requiring Standards; When
Administrative Register (ONAR) of the UP Law Center. Not Required): (SPIRPE) _
Failure to comply with this makes the administrative 1. Handling of State property or funds '-·
issuance ineffective & may not be enforced. (GMA v. · 2. When the law does not Involve Personal or property
MTRCB, G.R. 148579, 2007) This registration requirement rights
is part of publication. 3. Matters of Internal administration
4. Power of the board to make Recommendation
Not all rules and regulations adopted by every government 5. Matters involving Privileges (liko use of property,
agency are to be filed with the UP Law Center. Only those engag:ng in profession) ',.
of general or of permanent character are to be filed. 6. Regulation or Exercise of police power to protect
Internal rules which are meant to regulate the personnel of general welfare, morals and public policy
the GSIS arc not subject to with the UP Law Center. (Board
of Trustees v, Velasco, G.R. 17046, 2011). Note: Still subject to reasonableness standard
s,
All that is required for the validity of rules promulgated by Nature of power of the Executive to adopt rules and i
administrative agencies is the filing of three (3) certified regulations to execute or Implement the law (.
'<, ••
copies with the University of the Philippine Law Center. The inherent power of the Executive to adopt rules and
Within 15 days of filing, administrative rules become ,,
regulations to execute or lmplemer.t the law is different '-.:
effective. Non-publication does not Invalidate the from the delegated legisl<Jtive power to prescribe rules.
Department Order. (Quezon City PTCA Federation v, The inherent power of the executive to adopt rules to
DepEd, G.R.No. 188720, 2016) execute the law does not require any legislative standards
Page 188 of 320
ATENEO CENTRAL
BAR OPERATIONS 2019 POLITICAL LAW
a party to be heard and to present evidence, is ;1ot a information to govern action is taken which may
mere technicality or a trivial matter in any judicial or
future actions, have no affect the parties' rights
quasi-judicial proceedings. The service of summons is -,
parties, and are not and parties are entitled to
a very vital and indisponsable ingredient of Du/3 · proceedings in which be present in person and
Process). When an agency fails to afford previous
action is taken against by counsel, participate in
notice, it may be cured by subsequently giving the the hearing, and entitled to
anyone.
party an opportunity to be heard. Motion for be furnished a record of
reconsideration is a means to cure the defect of notice. the proceedings.
12. Non-ming of any administrative charge against the
accused preparatory to his dismissal, and therefore
the dismissal effected without any administrative · . The filing of formal charges 'against the respondents
complaint, violated the right of the accused to without complying with the mandated preliminary
substantive and procedural due process. He is entitled investigation (provided by Jaw) or at least giving the
to reinstatement and to payment of the salaries, · respondents the opportunity to tomment violated their right
allowances, and other benefits withheld from him by to due process. Accordingly, the formal charges are void
reason of his discharge from the service. (Calinlsan v. ab initio and may be assailed directly or indirectly at
Roaquin, G.R. 159588, 2010) anytime. (Garcia v. Molina, G.R. 157383/174137, 2010)
13. The subsequent desistance by complainant does not
free tho respondent from liability, as tho purpose of an A formal charge is a 'written speciiication of the charge(s)
administrative proceeding is to protect the public against an employee. While its form may vary, it generally
service based on the time-honored principle that a embodies a brief statement of the material and relevant
public officer is a public trust. (Encinas v. Agustin Jr., facts constituting the basis of the charge(s); a directive for
G.R. 187317,2013) the err.ployee to answer the charge(s) in writing and under
14. The Revised Rules on Administrative Cases in the Civil oath, accompanied by his/her evidence; and advice for the
Service themselves provide that administrative employee to indicate in his/her answer whether he/she
investigations shall be conducted without strict elects a formal investigation; and a notice that he/she may
recourse to the technical rules of procedure and secure the assistance of a counsel of his/her own choice.
evidence applicable to judicial proceedings. (Adalin v. (PAGCOR v. CA, G.R. 185668, 2011)
Taninas, G.R. L-198682, 2013)
15. The dismissal of the criminal complaint does not affect In administrative proceedings, the complainant bears the
the administrative case arising from the same incident onus of establishing, by substantial evidence, the
which gave rise to said criminal case. (Gabriel v. avennents of his complaint. A complainant cannot rely on
Ramos, A.M. P-06-2256, 2013) mere conjenctures and suppositions. (Sasing v.
Gelboiingo, A.M. No. P-12-3032, 2013; Re: Letter
Exceptions to Requirement of Notice And Hearing: Complaint of Merlita 8. Fabiana Against Presiding Justice
(UTOS CLAPP) Andres 8. Reyes, A.M. No. CA-13-51-J, 2013)
1. Urgency of immediate action '',
2. Tentativeness of the administrative action The AMLC's investigation of money. laundering offenses
3. 'Right was previously Offered but not claimed and its determination of possible money laundering .
4. Summary abatement of a nuisance per se offenses, specifically Its inquiry into certain bank accounts
5. Cancellation of a passport of a person sought for allowed by court order, does not transform it into an
criminal prosecution investigative body exercising quasi-judicial powers.
6. Summary proceedings of Levy upon properties of a Hence, Section 11 of the AMLA, authorizing a bank inquiry
delinquent taxpayer court order, cannot be said to violate SPCMB's
7. Replacement of a temporary or Acting appointee constitutional right to procedural process. (Subido Pagente
8. Preventive suspension of a public servant facing Certeza Mendoza and Binay Law Offices v. CA, G.R. No.
administrative charges 216914,2017)
9. Padlocking of filthy restaurants/ theaters showing
obscene movies Rules on adjudication (EO 292, Book VII)
1. Compromise and Arbitratlon - every agency shall, in
lnvastiaation v. Hearin----.,--~~~------~---~'""'I the public interest, encourage amicable settlement,
compromise and arbitration.
INVESTIGATION HEARING 2. All parties shall be entitled to notice and hearing; the
notice shall be served at least 5 days before the date
By government officials, There are parties and of hearing and shall state the date, time, and placo of
which may be held in issues of law ana of fact to the hearing. . ,:
private are informal be tried and at the 3. Parties shall be given opportunity to present evidence \.,.,
proceedings to obtain conclusion of the hearing,
and arqurnent on all issues.
Page 192 of 320
ATENEO CENTRAL
BAR OPERATIONS 2019 POLITICAL LAW
4. Rules on Evidence - May admit evidence commonly 2. A petition for review shall be perfected within 15 days
accepted by reasonably prudent men. from receipt of the final administrative decision; 1
5. Right to cross-examine witnesses. month's extension may be allowed.
6. Agency may make judicial notice to any technical or
scientific facts within in its specialized knowledge. Controversies among Government Offices and
7. The agency shall have the power to require the Corporations
attendance of witnesses or the production of books, All disputes of gover:'lment agencies and corporations are
papers, documents and other pertinent data; may settled administratively in the manner provided by the
Invoke the aid of the RTC within whose jurisdiction the Administrative Code. {EO 292, Book IV, Chap. 14)
contested case falls.
8. Decision - every decision rendered by the agency in a Submission for Decision for Questions of Law v.
contested case shall be in writing and shall state Questions of Fact and Law
clearly and distinctly the facts and the law on which it
QUESTIONS QUESTIONS
is based; shall decide within 30 days following the
OF LAW OF FACT AND LAW
submission.
9. Finality of Order - decision shall be final and
Submitted to Secretary of 1. Solicitor-General - if
executory 15 days after the receipt or a copy thereof.
Justice as Attomey- the dispute, claim or
10. Publication and Compilation of decisions - Every
General. His ruling shall be controversy involves
agency shall publish and make available for public
binding on all the parties only depanments,
inspection all decisions and final orders. It shall be the
concerned. bureaus, offices, and
duty of the records officer of the agency to prepare a
other agencies of the
register or compilation of those decisions or final
National Government
orders.
as well as the GOCCs.
2. Secretary of Justice, in
Administrative Appeal and Review
! .' ull other cases not
Appeal
mentioned above.
an appeal from a final decision of the agency may be taken
to the department head.
The determination of factual issues may be made by
Perfection of Administrative Appeals arbitration panel composed of representatives from each
Appeals shall be perfected within 15 days after the receipt parties, presided over by Secretary of Justice.
of a copy of the decision complained of by the party
' .· adversely affected. General rule: the decision of Solicitor-General and
Secretary of Justice is binding and final.
Effect I
The appeal shall stay tne decision appealed from if the Exception: When the claim involves 1 million pesos, in
appellate agency does not olrect otherwise .. which case, the dispute is appealed to the Office of the
'~ '
President.
Action on Appeal
The appellate agency may review record and receive Administrative res judicata
additional evidences. Decisions and orders of administrative agencies have
upon their finality, the force and effect of a final judgment
Finality of Decision of Appellate Agency within the purview of the doctrine of res judicata.
...-. ..,·, becomes final 15 days after receipt of the decision by the
parties. The extent of whether an administrative decision operates
(,. !, as res judicata also depends on the interpretation of the
' ;
enabling statute.
Judicial Review
Agency decisions shall be subject to judicial review. The The application of the doctrine of res judicata is dependent
action may be brought against the agency, its officers, and upon the type of determination and proceedings. It is
all indispensible and necessary parties. applicable in administrative actions that have been
characterized as "adjudica\ory," "judicial," or "quasi-
~-
>
)
Perfection of Appeal judicial." On the other hand, it is inapplicable in
1 .. Theappeal shall be perfected by filing with the agency administrative determinations which are of
within 15 days from receipt of copy; copies shall be "administrative," "executive," "legislative," or "ministerial"
served upon the agency and all parties of records. nature.
· Page 1 03 of 320
-- - -- ·-·-··- -·-----------------------
ATENEO CENTRAL
BAR OPERATIONS 2019
POLITICAL LAW
Example: The pnnciple of res judicata is applicable in purpose without a judicial warrant authorizing such
labor relations proceedings which are "non-litigious and action; usually without notice and hearing. (e.g.
summary in nature without regard to legal technicalities abatement of nuisance, summary restraint, levy of
obtaining in courts of law." (Rules and Regulations property of delinquent taxpayers)
Implementing the tabcq Code, Sec. 5, Rule XIII, Book V).
i
Not Applicable FACT-FINDING, INVESTIGATIVE, LICENSING AND
1. When the question of citizenship is resolved by a RA TE-FIXING POWERS
court or an administrative body as a material issue
in the controversy after a full-blown hearing. (Zita Investigatory Powers
Ngo Burca v. Republic, G.R. 122226, 1998; United The power to inspect, secure, or require the disclosure of
Pepsi Cola v. Laguesma, G.R. L-24252, 1973) in.formati':m by means of accounts, records, reports,
2. When wee Rereree awards the employee less statements and testimony of witnesses. This power is
than what the law provides (BF Goodrich v. wee, implled and not inherent in adrnlnistrative agencies. (Sec.
G.R. L-42319, ·1978) of Justice v. Lantion, G.R. No. 139465, 2000)
to relieve from an affirmative duty. It differs · from such, the admissions made by petitioner during the '
licensing power since dispensing power sanctions a investigation may be used as evidence to justify her '"-
deviation from a standard. , dismissal. (Carbone! v. CSC, G.R. 187689, 2010)
,
5. Summary powers - Those that apply compulsion or
force against person or property to effectuate a legal
u
Page 194 of 320 <
ATENEO CENTRAL
BAR OPERATIONS 2019 POLITICAL LAW
General Rule: The courts accord groat weight and respect Exceptions to Doctrine of Primary Jurisdiction:
to factual findings of administrative bodies. · 1. Congress does not intend that the issues be left solely
.\ I
to the administrative agency for Initial detennination;
Exceptions: (FIG-SEC) · 2. When issues involve questions of law; and
1. The finding!; are vitiated by Fraud, mistake, illegality, 3. When courts and administrative agencies have
collusion or imposition; concurrent jurisdiction. (Republic v, Martinez, G.R. No.
2. Where the procedure which led to the factual findings 158253,2007)
is Irregular;
3. When Grave abuse of discretion, arbitrariness or The -Doctrine of Primary Jurisdiction does not apply in a
capriciousness is manifest and case seeking to enjoin the Senate Committee from
4. The findings are not supported by Substantial conducting further hearings against Senator Villar on the
;
:, ,J evidence; alleged double insertion of P200 million for the C-5 Road
5. Where palpable Errors are committed; Extension Project in the 2008 General Appropriations Act.
•.:,._ .:~ 6. When there is a Conflict in the factual findings. The issues presented here do not require the expertise,
specialized skills and knowledge of respondent for their
·' ·--~~ The determination of where, as between two possible · resolution. On the contrary, the issues here are purely legal
routes, to construct a road extension is obviously not VJithin questions which are within the competence and jurisdiction
the province of the Court. Such determination belongs to of the Court, and not a11, administrative agency or the
the executive branch. There can be no judicial review of a Senate to resolve. (Pimentel v. Senate, G.R. No. 187714,
question of executive policy. (Tortecampo v, MWSS, G. R. 2011)
188296, 2011)
The Supreme Court may defer to the competence and
Doctrines: expertise of the SEC if there are supervening events which
1. Finality of Administrative Action - The decision of could have substantially changed the factual backdrop of
the tribunal must be final fir$! before it may be reviewed the case while it was pending before the Court. (Nestle v.
by the courts. Uniwide, G.R. 174674, 2010). However, complaints for
2. Primary Jurisdiction - Not concerned with judicial criminal violations of the Securities Regulation Code must
\' ~ .~
review but determines in some circumstances whether be filed with the SEC, not DOJ or the courts, because it is
Page 195 of 320
ATENEO CENTRAL
BAR OPERATIONS 20~9 · POLITICAL LAW
~nsidered a specialized dispute. (Baviera v. Paglinawan, EXCEPTIONS: (OARNN JP LICO DRIED LPS Quo)
G.R. 168380, 2007). 1. If it should appear that an irreparable Damage will be
suffered by a party unless resort to the court is
The court may raise the issue of primary jurisdiction motu immediately made.
proprio and its invocation cannot be waived by the failure 2. When the respondent is the Alter ego of the President
of the parties to argue it, as the doctrine exists for the 3. When no administrative Review is provided as a
proper distribution of power between judicial and condition precedent for court action .
administrative bodies and not for the convenience of the 4. Where insistence on its observance would result in the
parties. In such a case, the CO/Jrt may (1) suspend the Nullificatlon of the claim asserted
judicial process pending referral of such issues to the 5. When there was No decision rendered
administrative body for its view, or (2) if the parties would 6. When there are special circumstances demanding
not be unfairly disadvantaged, dismiss the case w/o immediate Judicial intervention
prejudice. (Euro-Med Laboratories Phil. v. Province of 7. When the administrative remedy is Permissive or
Batangas, G.R. 148106. 2006) concurrent
8. When the question raised is essentially and purely
Legal
DOCTRINE OF EXHAUSTION OF ADMINISTRATIVE 9. When strong public Interest is involved
REMEDIES 10. Where the issue raised is the Constitutionality of the
statute, rule or regulation
General Rule: An administrative decision must first be 11. Where it is a civil action for Damages
appealed to the administrative superiors up to the highest 12. Where the officer acted in utter 'disreqard of Due
level before it may be elevated to a court of justice for process
review. It is a condition precedent that must be complied 13. When there is no other plain, speedy, adequate
with. (Sps. Sadang v. CA, G.R. No. 140138, 2006) Remedy
14. When act complained of is patently Illegal
The premature invocation of a court's intervention is fatal 15. When the administrative body or the person invoking
to one's cause ot action. Exhaustion of administrative the doctrine is in Estoppel
remedies is a prerequisite for judicial review. It ls a 16. When there is lonq-contlnued and unreasonable Delay
condition precedent which must be complied with. 17. When the subject of controversy is private Land
18. When the corsroversv involves Possessory action
Where what is assailed is the validity or constitutionality of involving public lands
a rule or regulation issued by the administrative agency in 19. When the claim involved is Small so that to require
the perforrnance of its quasi-judicial function, the assailing exhaustion would be oppressive and unreasonable
party must exhaust acminlsfratlve remedies before going· 20. In Quo warranto proceedings
to court. However. if the rule or regulation was issued
pursuant to the administrative agency's quasi-legislative A case where the issue raised is a purely legal question,
.>
function, a party need not exhaust administrative well within the competence and the jurisdiction of the court 0
remedies. The determination of whether a speclfic rule or and not the administrative agency, would clearly constitute
(" ":
set of rules issued by an administrative agency an exception. Resolving questions of law, which involve \· ..;
contravenes the law or the constitution is withir. the the interpretation and application of laws, constitutes
jurisdiction of the regular courts. {Smart Communications essentially an exercise of judicic'I power that is exclusively . l
'i., l
v, NTC, G.R. No. 151908, 2003) allocated to the Supreme Court and such lower courts the
Legislature may establish. (Onqsuco v. Malones, G.R.
Reasons: 182065,2009)
1. To enable tt,e administrative superiors to correct the
errors committed by their subordinates; it bears stressing that the remedies of mandamus and
2. Courts should refrain from disturbing the findings of prohibition rnay bs availed of only when there is no appeal
administrative bodies in deference to the doctrine of or any other plain, speedy and adequate remedy in the
separation of powers; ordinary course of law. Moreover, being extraordinary
3. Courts should not be raddled with the review of remedies, resort may be had only in cases of extreme
administrative cases; necessity where the ordinary forms of procedure are
4. Judicial review of admini trative cases is usually done powerless to affo,d relief. Thus, ir,stead of immediately ~-· .,
r "
\_,,
through special civil actions which are available only if filing a petition with the CA, pP.titioners should have first
there is no other platn, speedy and adequate remedy. brought the matter to the CSC which has primary
5. Availment of administrative remedy entails lesser jurisdiction over the case. (Cabungcal v. Lorenzo, G.R.
expenses and provides for a speedier disposition of 160367, 2009)
controversies t ;.
The special civil actions against administrative officers ------- end of topic ------
should not be entertained if there are superior
administrative officers who could grant relief. (Dimson v.
Local Water Utilities Administration, G.R. 168656, 2010)
DOCTRINE OF FINALITY
OF ADMINISTRATIVE ACTION
Regulation of Suffrage
Congress has unlimited power to er.act laws relative to
the right of suffrage and in the exercise of police power,
to suppress whatever evils may be incident to the election
.(
<,;
of public officers.
Scope of Suffrage
1. Referendum - power of the electorate to approve or
reject legislation through an election called for the
purpose \ ... ~ ..
ATENEO CENTRAL
BAR OPERATIONS 2019 POLITICAL LAW
-----------------------------------------------------------------------·~------~
2. Recall - it is the termination of official relationship of right to vote is reacquired upon expiration of five (5)
a local elective official for loss of confidence prior to years after service of sentence.
the expiration of hi,:; term through the will of the 2. Any person who has been adjudged by final judgment
electorate by a competent court or tribunal of having committed
any crime involving disloyalty to the duly constituted
3.. Initiative - it is the power of the people to propose government such as REBELLION, SEDITION,
. amendments to the Constitution or to propose and VIOLATION OF THE ANTI-SUBVERSION AND
enact legislations through an election called fer the FIREARMS LAWS, OR ANY CRIME AGAINST
purpose. It is the people power feature of the NATIONAL SECURllJY
Constitution. a. For (1) and (2):
. 4. Plebiscite - it is the electoral process by which an b. Disqualification may be removed by plenary
initiative on the Constitution is approved or rejected by pardon or amnesty.
the people. It is also the means by which the voters in c. Reacquisition of the right to vote upon
affected areas consent or object to the change in the expiration of 5 years after service of sentence.
form of local government. . 3. Insane or incompetent persons as declared by
competent authcrity.
5. Election - it is the choice or selection of candidates to
public office by popular vote through the use of the NOTE:
ballot. Specifically, it may refer to the conduct of the These qualifications are continuing requirements.
polls, including the listing of voters, the holding of the Congress may not add qualifications but can provide for
electoral campaign and the casting and counting of procedural requirements and disqualiflc.ations. However,
ballots and canvassing of returns. . the disqualifications must not amount to qualifications
Kinds of Election All these disqualifications presuppose that the person was
once qualified, but due to an intervening event, the person
1. Regular or General: provided by law for the election of became disqualified. The Congress cannot add
officers either nation-wide or in certain subdivisions disqualifications which can be characterized as a prior
thereof, after the expiration of the full term of the former restraint.
officers;
2. Special: one held to fill a vacancy before the expiration Dual Citizenship Law - Former natural-born Filipino
of the term which the incumbent was elected · citizens who acquired foreign citizenship through
naturalization are deemed not to have lost their Philippine
citizenship under conditions provided in this act.
Election Period
Unless otherwise fixed by the Commission in special Derivative Citizenship - The unmarried child, whether
cases, the election period shall commence 90 days legitimate, illegitimate, or adopted, under 18 years of age,
,: -
., l
.....J before the day cf election and shall end 30 days of those who re-acquire Philippine citizenship under the
thereafter. (CONST. Art.lX-C, Sec.9; B.P. Big. 881) Dual Citizenship Law shall be deemed citizens of the
Philippines.
1. QUALIFICATION AND DISQUALIFICATION OF
, Requirement for Naturalized Citizens:
VOTERS To vote - swear an oath of allegiance.
To be elected to public office - renounce foreign
·•,
'- _, ,I.
Qualifications (CD R2 18): citzenship.
1. ~itizen of the Philippines To be appointed to public office - swear an oath of
2. Not .Qisqualified by law
"· ~· 3. Besident of the Philippines for at least 'i YEAR
allegiance to the Philippines and renounce foreign
citizenship.
4. ,Resident of the place wherein he proposes to vote for
at least 6 months immediately preceding the election Residence - One's domicile or legal residence. It is
:.' . 5. At least 18 years old where a party actually or constructively has his permanent
' s
home, or where he, no matter where he may be found,
Note: No literacy, property, or other substantive eventually intends to return and remain.
requirement can be imposed on the exercise of suffrage
Residency Requirements:
--:.. ... Grounds for Disqualification to Vote: Domicile - This is in reference to the 1-year residency
1. Any person who has been sentenced by final judgment requirement in the Philippines.
to suffer imprisonment for not less than one (1) year,
'
·,. ~
unless pardoned or granted amnesty. However, the
Page 199 of 320
ATENEO CENTRAL
BAR OPF.RATIONS 2019 POLITICAL LAW
basis by the Election Registration Board. member of an accredited citizen's arms using the data
supplied by the applicant. (R.A. No. 8189, Sec. 14)
List of Voters
Disqualifications to Register as Voter
It refers to an enumeration of names of registered votersin
The same grounds for disqualifications for suffrage.
a precinct duly certified by the Election Registration Board ( '
for use in the election. (RA No 8189)
1. Sentence by final judgment to imprisonment of at least
1 year
No Bio-No Boto 2. Conviction by final judgment of any of the following
Biometrics - refers to a quantitative analysis that provides crimes:
a positive identifica'.io,, of an individual such as voice a. crime involving disloyalty to the government (i.e
photograph, fingerprint, signature, iris, and/or such othe~ rebellion, sedition)
identifiable features. (Mandatory Biometrics Voter b. firearms law
Registration, sec. 2(b))
c. crimes against national security
The biometrics registration requirement is not a 3. Insanity or incompetence declared by competent court
"qualification" to the exercise of the right of suffrage, but a l ..
When registration not allowed: for the annulment of a book of voters witr. the COMELEC.
1. 120 days before regular election Last day for filing is within 90 days before an election.
2. 90 days before special election
Grounds for Annulment of Book of Voters (S2N-
Each precinct shall have no more than 200 voters and shall F312B):
comprise contiguous and compact territories except when 1. ,Not prepared in accordance with law
precincts are clustered. 2. Prepared through:
• fraud
No Election Officer shall hold office In a particular • forgery
city/municipality for more than 4 years. COMELEC has the • force
authority to effect transfer. • Intimidation
• Impersonation
Can COMELEC change registration period by • §.ribery
resolution? · • .§imilar irregularity
. No. The period within which voters may register to vote is • Contains data that are .§.totistically improbable
set by law and cannot be changed by mere resolution of
the COMELEC. Change of Residence (To Another Municipality or City)
Any registered voter may apply with the Election Officer of
Book of voters - Classified as permanent whereby each his new residence for the transfer of his registration
precinct shall have a permanent list of all registered voters · records. The application shall be subject to notice and
residing within the territorial jurisdiction of that precinct. hearing and approval of the ERB. (R.A. No. 8189, Sec. 12)
. I
ATENEO CENTRAL
BAR OPERATIONS 2019 POLITICAL LAW
Domestic Absentee Voting - Public officials Failure to undertake lmprlsonment of not less
'•.
stationed in places other than the place where he is a affidavit yet voted than 1 year
registered voter are allowed to vote in tho place of their
Failure to resume Removal of name from list
work. (e.g. police officers, military personnel, school
teachers). residency
Overseas Absentee Voting - Qualified Filipinos Failure to resume Imprisonment of not less
abroad may be allowed to vote under a system residency yet voted than 1 year
congress will provide.
11
The requirement of actual residency is dispensed with. { ·'
Page 202 of 320 '~
ATENEO CENTRAL
BAR OPERATIONS 2019 POLITICAL LAW
2. serving a sentence of imprisonment for lese than one (1) Manila In a sealed envelope. The votes appearing
-, . in said ballots for national positions, If any, shall be
year; or
3. whose conviction of a crime involving disloyalty to the counted.
duly constituted government such as rebellion, sedition, A Special Board of Election Inspectors for counting
shall be established for the purpose.
violation of the firearms laws or any crime against national
security or for any other crime is on appeal (COMELEC
POLITICAL PARTIES
Resolution No. 9371 );
1. JURISDICTION OF THE COMELEC OVER
Escorted Voting POLITICAL PARTIES
This is a voting mechanism for
1. detainee voters who are residents/ registered voters of Necessity of Registration
municipalities/cities other than the town/city of
To acquire juridical personality, to qualify for
incarceration; and/or for
accreditation, and to be entitled to the rights of political
2. detainee voters in jail facilities where no special polling parties, a political party must be registered with
places are established (COMELEC Resolution No. COMELEC. (Omnibus Election Code, sec, 20)
9371).
Registration and Accreditation
NOTE: The pertinent provisions of Comelec Resolution a. Registration is the act that bestc:wsjuridical personality
No. 9149, promulgated on February 22, 2011 and other for purposes of our election laws; accred'tatton , on the
Resolutions as far as the registration period: qualifications other hand, relates to the privileged participation that
and disqualifications of applicants for registration; the our election laws grant to qualified registered parties.
procedures for filing, processing and hearing of
b. Accreditation can only be granted to a registered
applications; and notices and publication requirements are
political party, organization or coalition; stated
adopted (COMELEC Resolution No. 9371).
otherwise, a registration must first take place before a
request for accreditation can be made . Once
Reckoning Period of Age and Residence Detainees
registration has been carried out, accreditation is the
Those who snail be eighteen years of age on the day of
next natural step to follow ( Magdaia Para sa
election and/or are committed inside the detention centers
Pagbabago v. COMELEC, G.R. No. 190793, 12 June
for at least six (6) months immediately prscedlnq the
2012 ).
election day may be reqistered as a voter (COMELEC
Resolution No. 9371 ). COMELEC has the power to:
• Register political partles, organizations, or coalitions,
Detainees who are already registered voters may apply for and the authority to cancel the same on legal grounds
transfer of registration records as warranted by the • En Banc has the authority to direct a hearing be
circumstances. conducted on the petition for cancellation of
r ';.
\._.:; registration of the party list. However, HRET has the
DETAINEE VOTERS MAY VOTE FOR NATIONAL jurisdiction for contest relating to the qualifications of
POSITIONS ONLY nominee or representative. (Alliance for Barangay
In the case of Aguinaldo v. New Bi/ibid Prison, G.R. No. Concerns Party List v, COMELEC, G.R. 193256,
221201, April 19, 2016,. the Supreme Court issued a 2011)
Temporary Restraining Order enjoining the COMELEC
from enforcing COMELEC Resolution No. 9371 on the Issue of validity or invalidity of the expulslon
local level. This means that detainee voters may only vote
for the national positions. The validity or invalidity of the expulsion of a political
ii
t-
'· J
I party's officers is purely a membership issue that has to
In pursuant to this, the COMELEC issued COMELEC be settled within the party. It is an internal party matter
..
. '. -
,":"
·~- Resolution No. 10112, amending Resolution No. 10057.
This provides that:
over which COMELEC has no jurisdiction. It may
intervene in disputes internal to a party only when
t :
The Board of Election Inspector (BEi) shall instruct necessary to the discharge of its constitutional functions,
c: the DV, in clear terms, that pursuant to the TRO, such as resolving an intra-party leadership dispute as an
incident of its power to register polltical parties (Atienza v,
'J . he or she can only vote for national candidates
.
..... COMELEC, G.R. 188920, 2010; Alcantara v. COMELEC,
namely, candidates for Pres., VP, Senators and
Party list, G.R. 203646, 2013).
-, ;
' All ballots that ccntain votes for local positions
shall be separated and transmitted to COMELEC
Page ~O~ of 320
ATENEO CENTRAL
BAR OPERATIONS 2019 POLITICAL LAW
REGISTRATION
The following political parties cannot be registered National Party ..:..._ Its constituency is spread over the
(UfC-R} geographical territory of at l~ast a majority of the regions.
Religious sects
Thpse which seek to achieve their goals through Y.nlawful Regional Party - Its constituency is spread over the
means geographical territory of at least a majority of the cities
Those which refuse to adhere to the Constitution and provinces cornprisinq a region.
Those which are supported by any foreign government.
( 1 ~87 Constitution, art. IX-C, sec. 2(5)). Sectoral Party - An organized group of citizens whose
principal advocacy pertains to the special interests and
Effect when party fails to obtain at least 10% votes concerns of the following sectors: ·
case in constituency· . 1. Labor
2. Fisher folk
Registration will be forfeited when at least 10% of the
votes cast in the constituency In which It nominated
3. Peasant
candidates is not obtaineo (Omnibus Election Code, sec.
4. Urban poor.
60j 5. Indigenous
6. Cultural communities
Party-list System 7. Youth
A social justice tool designed not only to give mere in law
8. Women
to the great masses of our people who have less in life,
9. Handicapped
but, also to enable them to become veritable lawmakers 10. Elderly
empowered to participate directl'.I in the enactment of 11. Overseas workers
laws designed to benefit them. 12. Veterans
13. Professional workers
Alms and Purposes:
1. Broaden the base of candidates Unique Characteristics of the Philippine Party-List
2. :Encourage multi-party system System:
3. :Ensure party loyalty Only In-House
4. 'Promote proportional representation • The proportional representation er party-list
I · system is only available in the House of
Congress cannot provide for a two-party system Representatives.
because: • Plurality formula is used for other elective officials.
1. :This violates the freedom of association as provided in. The 20% Allocation - The combined number of all party-
the Bill of Rights. . list representatives shall not exceed 20% of the total
2. 1The Constitution mandates that the Phllippine party membership of the House of Representatives, including
system shall be multi-party, open and free. those elected under the party list. However. this only
I prescribes a ceiling and is not considered mandatory.
Poll,tlcal Party - An organized group of persons {
pursuing the same ideology, political ideas or p!atforms of t -,
No. of seats. available to Party-List Reps = (No. of seats
govf rnment including its branches and divisions. available to District Reps/0.80) X 0.20
Criteria to Determine.Type of Political Party (021RA):
• !:stablished .Becord of said parties showing in past Two Votes .
~lections 1.· 1st vote - For the district representative
• Number of Incumbent elective officials 2. 2nd vote - For the party-list representative (but it is '
\..,.'
• Identifiable political Qrganizations and strengths the name of the party that is indicated in the ballot)
• ,Ability to fill and complete slate of candidates
• ~her analogous circumstances (RA 7166, sec. 26}. The 2% Threshold and 3-Seat Limit
. 1. The parties shall be ranked from the highest to lowest
Types of Parties: based on t.he number of votes they garnered.
1. Non-Registered Parties 2. To be entitled to one qualifying seat, a party must
2. RegisterE.:d Parties . obtain 2% of the total ballots cast for qualified party-list
a. Dominant Majority - Entitled to a copy of ER candldatos.
b. Dominant Minority - Entitled to a copy of ER 3. Votes cast for a party which is not entitled to be voted
c. Top 3 - Entitled to appoint a principal watcher > for should not be counted. The votes they obtained
and a copy of the COC shall be deducted from the canvass of the total votes . '
d. Bottom 3 - Entitled to appoint a principal watcher for the party-list. .
'~ ........
Page 204 of 320
ATENEO CENTRAL
BAR OPERATIONS2019 POLITICAL LAW
4. Rounding-off is not allowed. • The party must not be an adiunct of, or a project
5. Parties other than the 1st party (the party that obtained organized or entity funded or assisted by the
the highest number of votes based on plurality) may be government.
entitled to additional seats based on the following • The nominee must be able to contribute to the
formula: formulation of appropriate legislation that will
benefit the whole nation.
No. of votes of party
o Must be organic member not synthetic
(No. of votes of 1st party x no. of seats of 1st party
member
• General averments that an organization
Each party is shall be entitled to not more than three se~s. represents the marginalized sectors must be
substantiated and shown through its constitution,
The two percent threshold in computing for the history, platform, and track record. It must
additional seats is unconstitutional, The continued demonstrate that in case of conflict of interests, it
application of the two percent threshold in the application is likely to choose the interest of the sectors.
of additional seats in proportion to their total number of ·, 2. Non-traditional
votes until all the additional seats will frustrate the • National parties;
attainment of the permissive ceiling that twenty percent of •. Regional parties
the members of the house of representatives shall consist Must be incapable of successful participation
of party-list representatives (BANAT v. Comelec, G.R. in district elections.
179271, 2009). Notes:
The inspiration of the system is social justice understood
Section 6(8) of RA 'i941 provides for two separate grounds in both the economic and political sense.
tor delisting; these grounds cannot be mixed or combined Participation in the system is not limited to the sectors
to support delisting: and the disqualification for failure to enumerated by the Constitution or lew.
garner 2% party-list votes in two preceding elections The enumerated sectors must be economically
...... .., shoeld now be understood, in light of the Banal ruling, to marginalized because that is what disables them from
mean failure to qualify for a party-list seat in two preceding successfully engaging in the political struggle.
elections for the constituency in whiC:1 it has registered. The national and regional organizations need not be
(Philippine Guardians v. COMELEC, G.R. 190529, 2010). economically marginalized but they must be politically or
ideologically disadvantaged or marginalized.
Party-list groups garnering less than 2% of the party-list Traditional political parties, if they wish to participate, must
votes may qualify for a seat in the allocation of additional renounce participation in district elections.
seats depending on their ranking in the second round. The Branches of political parties, if they wish to participate,
continued operation of the two-percent threshold was must be separately incorporated and be independent of
deemed "an unwarranted obstacle to the full their originc,11 parties.
'( .,
implementation of Section 5(2), Article VI of the
.· ":. Constitution and prevents the attainment of the "broadest COMELEC must be guided by what the SC said: "The
possible representation of party, sectoral or group interests common denominator between sectoral and non-sectoral
in the House of Representatives," and has been declared parties is that they cannot expect to win in legislative
·unconstitutional. The 20% share in rspresentatlon may district elections but they can garner in nationwide
never be filled up if the 2% threshold is maintained. In the elections, at least the same number of votes that winning
same vein, the maximum representation will riot be candidates can garner in legislative district elections. The
achieved if those party-list grouµs obtaining less than one party-Ist system will be the entry point to membership in
percentage are disqualified from even one additional seat the House of Representatives for both these non-
.... ~·.• in the second round. (Aksyon Mag:;asaka-ParlidoTinig ng traditional parties that could not compete 1n legislative
[ .: Masa (AKMA-PTM) vs. COMELEC, G.R. 207134, 2015) district elections." (Atong Paglaum v. COMELEC, G.R. No.
·~-· 203766, 2013).
Qualified Organizations (Along Paglaum v. COMELEC, j
G.R. 203766, 2013) Qualifications of a Party-List Nominee: (ABC-RV-25)
1. Sectors enumerated in the Constitution must be A natural-born ~itizen of the Philippines
.! .
~j marginalized and underrepresented A registered yoter
• Only parties and organizations that actually and A Resident of the Philippines for a period of not less than
truly represent the underrepr€sented and 1 year immediately preceding the election day
marginalized constituencies which are Able to read and write
enumerated in the Constitution can participate. A §.ona fide member of the party he seeks to represent for
• At least a majority of its members should belong to at least 90 days preceding election day (need not be
' . the marginalized. marginalized persons)
a
At least 25 years of age on election day.
Page 205 of 320
ATENEO CENTRAL
BAR OPERATIONS 20·19 . POLITICAL LAW
In case of the youth sector, he must be at least 25 but not 2. any of the enumerated grounds for disqualification
more than 30 years of age on the day of the election. in Section 6, R.A. No. 7941 exists (Dayao v.
Any youth sectoral representative who reaches the age of COMELEC, G.R. 193643, 2013).
thirty 30 during his term shall be allowed to continue in
office until the expiration of his term. Each accredltatlon handed by the COMELEC to party-list
A list with 5 names should be submitted to COMELEC as organizations can be likened to the franchise granted by
to who will represent the party in the Congress. Ranking in Congress, thru the SEC, to corporations or associations
the list submitted determines who shall represent party or created under the Corporation Code. A party-list
organization. organization, like a corporation, owes its legal existence to
the concession of Its franchise from the State, thru the
Disqualification of Party-Lists: (F2V2R-COPS) COMELEC. Being a mere concession, it may be revoked
1. foreign party or organization by the granting authority upon the existence of certain
2. Receives foreign support conditions. The fact that a franchise/accreditation may be
3. Advocates ViolP.nce revoked means that it can never be final and conclusive
4. Yiolates electicn laws (Dayao v. Comission on Elections, G.R. 193543, 2013)
5. B.eligious sect, denomination, organization
6. £eased to exist for at least 1 year The laws, rules and regulations violated to warrant
7. Failed to Qbtain at least 2% of the votes cast under cancellation under Section 6 must be one that is primarily
the party-list system in the 2 preceding elections imputable to the party itself and not one that is chiefly
8. Failed to farticipate In the last 2 preceding confined to an Individual member or its nominee.
elections ( COCOFED-.0hilippine Coconut Producers Federation,
9. Untruthful .§.tatements in its petition Inc. v. Commission on Elections, G.R. 207026, 2013).
Cancellation of reqistratlon of a party list may be done by The disqualification of some of the nominees shall not
the COMELEC motu p,·oprio or upon verified complaint of result in the disqualification of the party-list group "provided
any interested party after due notice and hearing. that they have at least one nominee who remains
qualified." ( C:OCOFED-Phi/ippine Coconut Producers
COMELEC may not, through a resolution setting the Federation, Inc. v, Commission on Elections, G.R. 207026,
deadline for registration of political parties, differentiate 2013).
between political parties, on the one hand, and political
organizations and coalitions, on the other. There is no Dellsting
substantial distinction among these entities germane to the
The law provides for 2 separate reasons for the delisting of
act of registration that would justify creating distinctions
among them in terms of deadlines. A petition for any natlonal, regional or sectoral party organization or
coalition. Section 6(8) of the Party - List system Act
registration as a political coalition filed beyond that .,
deadline Is time-barred, and the COMELEC resolution provides that the COMELEC may rnotu proprio or upon
granting that petition constitutes grave abuse of discretion. · verified complaint of any interested party, remove or r
i:-
(Liberal Party v, COMELEC, G.R. 191771, 2010). cancel, after due notice and hearing, the registration of any
national, r~Jional or sectoral party organization or
Section 15 of RA 7941 provides that a nominee . of a coalition. The grounds are :
sectoral party who changes his sectoral affiliation within (a) if it fails to participate in tile last two (2) preceding
the same party is not eligible for nomination under the new
· elections; or
sectoral affiliation, unless such change occurred at least -,
six months before the elections. Section 15 clearly covers (b) fails to obtain at least two per centum (2%) of the votes
changes in both political party and sectoral affiliation within cast under the patty list system in the two (2) preceding
r-" ..
the same party. (Amores v. HRET, G.R. 189600, 2010). elections for the constituency in which it was registered
( Philippine Guardians Brotherhood, Inc. (PGBI) v.
Moral disapproval is nor a sufficient governmental interest COMELEC, G.R. No. 190529, 29 April 2010) .,.
!
to justify exclusion of homosexuals from participation in the '·
8. CANDIDACY
• Use of Foreign Passport: The use of a foreign
. passport amounts to repudiation or recantation of the
1. QUALIFICATIONS OF CANDIDATES
oath of renunciation. Matters dealing with
Candidate • A person aspiring for or seeking an elective
public office who has filed by himself or through an qualifications for public elective office must be strictly
accredited political party a certificate of candidacy at the complied with. A candidate cannot simply be allowed
start of the campaign period to correct the deficiency ln his qualification by
submtttinq another oath of renunciation {Amado v .
There is no constitutional right to run for or hold public COMELEC, G.R. No. 210164, August 18, 2015)
office. What is recognized is merely a privilege subject to
limitations imposed by law. • Dual Citizens: Dual citizens are disqualified from
running for any elective local position. They cannot
The right to run for public office is not inextricably successfully run and assume office because their
intertwined with the rights of expression and association. ineligibility is inherent In them, existing prior to the
One's interest in seeking office, by itself, is not entitled to filing or their certificates or candidacy. Their
constitutional protection. One cannot bring one's action certificates of candidacy are void ab initio, and votes
under the rubric of freedom of association, absent any. cast for them will be dlsregard9d. Consequently,
allegation that, by running for an elective position, one is
whoever gamers the next highest number of votes
advancing the political Ideas of a particular set of voters.
among the eligible candidates is the parson legally
(Quinto v. COMELEC, G.R. 189698, 2010).
entitled to the position { Arlene Llena Empaynado v .
Note: Congress may not add to the qualifications for COMELEC, G.R No. 216607, April 5, 2016 ).
elective officials provided in the Constitution. However,
• Foundlings: As a matter of law, foundlings are as a
they may do so for elective officials net provided in the
class, natural - born citizens ( Poe - Llamanzares v .
Constitution.
COMELEC, G.R. No. 221697, March 8, 2016 ).
When the names of the parents of a foundling cannot
Qualifications
be discovered despite a diligent search, but sufficient
The Constitution prescribes tt1e qualification s {i.e., age, ' evidence is presented to sustain a reasonable
citizenship, residency, voter registration and literacy) for inference that satisfies the quantum of proof required
the following positions: President, Vice • President, · to conclude that at least one or both of his o r her
Senators and Representatives (District and Party • List) parents is Filipino, then this should be sufficient to
...,
while statutes set the qualifications of local officials. establish that he or she is a natural • born citizen
1. Residence - to be understood as domicile that is, the (Rizalito Y. David v . Senate Electoral Tribunal, G.R.
· place where a party actually or constructively has his No. 221538, September 20, 2016)
permanent home, where he/ she, no matter where may
he/ she be round at any given time, eventually intends Disqualifications
to return and remain (Japson v. COMELEC , G.R. No.
·180088, 19 January 2009) Constitution
'
··~ ,t
. 2. Registered Voter
1. Three • term limit for local elective officials ( Art. X,
3. Citizenship Sec. 8 of the Constitution)
• For national elective positions, the candidate must be • term limit rule is not a ground for a petition for
a natural - born citizen. For local elective positions, disqualification, however, it is an ineligibility which is a
the candidate may be naturalized citizen. proper ground for a petition to ,jer,y due course to or
• Natural - born citizens of the Philippines who have to cancel a Certificate of Candidacy under Section 78
lost their Philippine citizenship by reason of their of the OEC ( Albania v, COMELEC, G.R. No. 226792,
naturalization as citizens of a foreign country can 7 June 2017 ).
seek elective office provided they re • acquire • Two conditions must concur for the application of the
Philippine citizenship by taking the oath of allegiance
disqualification of a candidate based on violation of
to the Republic prescribed under the Citizenship the three - term limit rule, which are: (1) that the official
i Retention and Re· acquisition Act of 2003, and make concern ed has been elected for three consecutive
·-;... J
a personal and sworn renunciation of any and all terms in the same local government post, and (2) that
foreign citizenship before any public officer
authorized to administer an oath.
ATENEO CENTRAL
BAR OPERATIONS 2019 POLITICAL LAW
he has fully served \hree consecutive terms ( Albania 1. . Those sentenced by final judgment for an offense
v. COMELEC, G.R. No. 226792, 7 June 2017 ). ir.volving moral turpitude or an offense punishable by
impriscnrnent for at least one year, within 2 years
• When it was only upon the favorable decision on his after service of sentence.
petition for correction of manifest error that a 2. Those removed from office as a result of an
candidate was prodaimed as the duly - elected official, administrative case.
he is deemed not to have served office for the full term 3. Those convicted by final judgment for violating his
of three years to which he was supposedly entitled, oath of allegiance to the Republic.
since he only assumed the post and served the 4. Those with dual citizenship.
unexpired term of his opponent ( Albania v. 5. Fugitives from justice in criminal or non - political
COMELEC, G.R. N0. 226792, 7 June 2017). cases.
• . An involuntary interrupted term, as in the case of
6. Permanent residents in foreign country or those who
assumption of office only after winning an election have the right to reside abroad and continue to avail
protest, cannot, in the context of the disqualification of it (Caasi v. Court of Appeals, 191 SCRA 229).
rule, be considered as one term for purposes of 7. The insane or feeble - minded (Sec. 40, Local
counting the three - term threshold, since prior to Government Code ) .
winning, the candidate was not the rightful holder of
the position ( Abundo v. COMELEC, G.R. No. 201716, Conditions For The Three-Term Ban:12
8 January 20 13 ). The official has been elected for 3 consecutive terms in the
same local government post
• A provincial board member's election to the same Fully served 3 consecutive terms
position for the third and fourth time, but now in Elected in a regular election
representation of the renamed district, is a violation of
the three - term limit rule ( Naval v. COMELEC; GR Service of Full Term:
No. 207851, 8 July 2014 ). When a municipality has been converted to a city, and the
· area and inhabitants of the locality are the same, and the
Omnibus Election Code 3-term municipal mayor continued to hold office until such
1. Any person declared by competent authority insane time as city elections are held.
or incompetent When an incumbent mayor loses in election protest but the
decision of the RTC was promulgated AFTER the service
2. Any person sentenced by final judgment for any of
of the term.
the following offenses:
1. Insurrection, or rebellion Not Service of Full Term:
2. Offense for which he was sentenced to penalty • Fills up a higher office (by succession or operation of
of more than 18 months law).
(
3. Crime involving moral turpitude ( Sec. 12, • Suspended from office (failed to serve full term). 1· .., ..
country unless he waives such status ( Sec. 68, • Served unexpired term after winning in the recall
elections
Omnibus Election Code )
• Assuming a local government post (even if served for
Revised Administrative Code-Municlpc1I Office 3 consecutive terms) after winning a recall election
(since not considered an immediate re-election).
1. Ecclesiastics (Parnil v. Teleron, 86 SCRA413)
2. Persons receiving compensation from provincial or Holdover Principle - The term of all local officials is 3
municipal funds years, but Sec. 5 of R.A. 9164 authorizes the holdover of
3. Contractors for public works of the municipality (Sec. incumbent barangay officials until their successors are
2175, Revised Administrative code ) . elected.
12
Note: The 3-term ban applies only for elective local
officials.
Page 208 of 320
A TENEO CENTRAL
BAR OPERATIONS 2019 POLITICAL LAW
N
--ot_e_:l_n_th_e_c_s_s_e_o_f-Ta_g_o-lin_o_v-.""."H~R~E~T:--,
~G-:.R:o-.~N-:-o-.
~20;:-;2~2~02~.-~o~f~t7::'.he:-"rc:ro~M"ELEC
(Cerafica v. COMELEC, GR. 205136,
2013, the COMELEC first ruled that substitutior. is allowed 2014)
because it held that a candidate's failure to meet the
· Nuisance candidates · . .
qualifications is a ground for disqualification. This was One who has no bona fide intention to run for the office: and
adopted by the HRET. However, the Supreme Court ruled would thus prevent a faithful determination of the true will
that it is actually a cancellation of the certificate of of the people. ·
candidacy. Thus. no substitution is allowed.
Factors to Consider: (CROP5-PIPES-IQ)
General Rule: No substitution is allowed for an 1. ~apability to wage nationwide campaign
independent candidate. Only candidates who are 2. Running under a slate · ·
members of and are nominated by a party can be 3. Qrganization and machinery
substituted. 4. Performance in previous elections
Exception: A candidate for a barangay elective office 5. Platform of government
notwithstanding the policy that barangay elections are non-
6. foiitical party affiliation and support
7. fopularity
partisan can be substituted by his/her spouse. (Ru/loda v. -,
8. froperties
COMELEC, G.R. 1541P8, 2003). 9. f.olitlcal exposure
10. Intention to run for office
Rules on Substitution: 11. Profession
1. Any candidate may withdraw his candidacy anytime 12. Educational attaintnent
before election day. . ' 13. §.imilarity in name causes confusion
2. A person without a valid certificate of candidacy cannot 14. Income
be considered a candidate and therefore cannot ·be 15. Qualifications and disqualifications
substituted.
3. Substitute candidate may file his certificate of COMELEC cannot motu proprio deny due course to or
candidacy no later than mid-day of election day. . · cancel an alleged nuisance candidate's certificate of
4. No person who has withdrawn his candidacy for a candidacy without providing the candidate his opportunity
position shall be eligible as a substitute candidate for to be heard. ( Timbol vs. COMEL EC, G.R. 206004, 2015)
any other position.
5. The substitute candidate must be qualified to hold Petition to deny or cancel certificates of candidacy
office and must be a member of and nominated by the
same political party. Who can file: Any Party
6. A public office is personal to the public officer and not How: Petition to deny due course or Cancel certificate of
a property transmissible to the heirs upon death. The candidacy under oath . ·
Court has allowed substitution and intervention but When: Any time not later than 25 days from filing of
only by a real party in interest. The Protestant's widow certificate of candidacy . · ·
is not a real party in interest to the election protest. Where: COMELEC must decide the case not later than 15
7. The filing of the withdrawal shall not affect the civil, · days before election (period is not mandatory however)
criminal or administrative llablilties the substituted
!
candidate may have already incurred. Exclusive Ground: material misrepresentation (FMD) ;
8 A candidate who is disqualified under Section 68 of the 1. Must be False. ·
Omnibus Election Code can be validly substituted 2. Must be Material (goes into the qualifications).
pursuant to Section 77 because he remains · a 3. Must be Qeliberate and there is an intention to defraud
candidate until disqualified; but a person whose the electorate.
certificate of candidacy has been denied due course to . ' '
and/or cancelled under Section 78 cannot be The COMELEC must determine whether or · not the
substituted because he is not considered a candidate candidate deliberately attempted to mislead, misinform or
(Tagolino vs. HRET, G.R. 26)2202, 2013). hide a fact about his or her residency that would otherwise
render him or her ineligible for the position sought. The
Ministerial duty of COMELEC to receive certificate COMELEC gravely abused its discretion in this case when,
It is the ministerial duty of COMELEC and its officers to in considering the residency issue, it based its decision
receive a certificate of candidacy (Omnibus Election Code. solely on very personal and subjective assessment
sec. 76) While the COMELEC may look into patent defects standards, such as the nature or design and furnishings of
in the CoCs, it may not go into matters not appearing on the dwelling place in relation to the stature of the candidate
their face. The question of eligibility or ineligibility of a (Mitra v. COMELEC, G.R. No. 191938, 2010).
candidate is thus beyond the usual and proper cognizance
Page 21 o of 320
ATENEO CENTRAL
BAR OPERATIONS 2019 POLITICAL LAW
A TENEO CENTRAL
BAR OPERATIONS 2019
POLITICAL LAW
prior term can be wiped off by the fact that he was elected d. A petition to deny due course or to cancel a certificate
to a second term of office, or even another elective post. of candidacy must be filed within 25 days from the time
ElecOon is not a mode of condoning an administrative '· of filing of the COC, as provided under Section 78 of
offense, and there is simply no constitutional or statutory the OEC ( Albania v. COMELEC, G.R. No. 226792, 7
basis in our jurisdiction to support the notion that an official June 2017 ).
elected for a different term is fully absolved of any e. A petition for disqualification of a nuisance candidate
administrative liability arising from an offense done during · should be filed within 5 days from the last day for filing
' a prior term. (Carpio-Morales v, Bfnay, G.R. 217126-27, certificate of candidacy ( Fermln v . COMELEC , G.R.
2015) No. 179695, 18 December 2008 ).
reasonable, (c) narrowly tailored to meet the objective of does not represent a trend ( Sec. 5.5, Republic Act No.
enhancing the opportunity of all candidates to be heard 9 006 ). .
and considering the primacy of the guarantee of free
Paid Advertisements
expression, and (d) demonstrably the least restrictive
1. PRINT
means to achieve that object. The regulation must only be
• X page in broadsheet, 3x a week
with respect to the time, place, and manner of the rendition
• ~ page in tabloid, 3x a week
of the message. In no situation may the speech be 2. RADIO (per network)
prohibited or censored on the basis of its content. For this • . Aggregated total of 180 mins. for National
purpose, it will not matter whether the speech is mane with candidates
or on private property. (Diocese of Baco/od v. COMELEC, • Aggregated total of 90 mins. for Local candidates
G.R. 205728, 2015; Note: obiter dictum). 3. TV (per network)
• Aggregated total of 120 mins. for National
Election Surveys candidates .
The names of those who commission or pay for election • Aggregated total of 60 mins. for Local candidates
surveys, Including subscribers of survey firms, must be
disclosed pursuant to Section 5.2(a) of the Fair Election TV and radio paid advertisements airtime cannot exceed · .
Act. This requirement is a valid regulation in the exercise their AGGREGATED TOTAL TIME. (COMELEC
of police power and effects the constitutional policy of Resolution No. 9615).
"guaranteeing equal access to opportunities for public
service.", and neithercurtalls petitioners' free speech rights The Fair Election Act does not justify a conclusion that the
I
nor violates the constitutional proscription against the maximum allowable airtime should be based on the
impairment of contracts. (Social Weather Stations, Inc. et totality of possible broadcast in · all television or 35 radio
al v. COMELEC, G.R. No. 208062, 2015) stations, and the COMELEC has no authority to provide
for rules beyond what was contemplated by the law it
When published, the tendency of election surveys to shape is supposed to implement ( GMA Network, Inc. v.
voter preferences comes into play. In this respect, COMELEC, G.R. 205357, 2014).
published election surveys partake of the nature of election
propaganda. it is then declarative speech in the context of General Rule: It shall be unlawful for any person or
an electoral campaign properly subject to regulation. organization to solicit and/ or accept any gift, contribution,
( Social Weather Stations, Inc. et al vs. COMELEC, G.R. food, transportation or donation in cash or in kind from the
208062, 2015) commencement of the election period up to and including
election day.
While Resolution No. 9674 does regulate expression (i.e., Exception: Normal and customary religious stipends,
petitioners' publication of election surveys), it does not go tithes or collections.
so far as to suppress deslred expression. There is neither
prohibition nor censorship specifically aimed at election Rules on Election Propaganda: \..,.
surveys. The freedom to publish election surveys remains. • All registered parties and bona fide candidates shall
All Resolution No. 9674 does is articulate a regulation as· have the right to reply to charqes published against
them.
regards the manner of publication, that is, that the
• No movie: cinematograph, documentary portraying the t.:,
disclosure of those who commissioned and/or paid for,
life or biography of a candidate shall be publicly
including those subscribed to, published election surveys exhibited in a theatre, 1V station, or any public forum 1:
must be made. (Social Weather Stations, Inc. et al v. during the campaign period. "~ -·
COMELEC, G.R. 208062, 2015) • No movie, cinematograph, documentary portrayed by
an actor or media personality who is himself a
Exit Polls candidate shall be publicly exhibi!ed in a theatre, TV
a: Surveys shall not be conducted within 50 meters from station or any public form during the campaign period.
the polling places. • All mass media entities shall furnish the COMELEC
I
b. Pollsters shall inform the voters that they may· refuse to with copies of all contracts for advertising, promoting, \.... .:
answer. or opposing any political party or the candidacy of any
c. The result may be announced after the closing of the person for public office with:n 5 days after its signing. "\;,.,.,:
polls on election day and must Identify the number of , e Any media personality who is a candidate or is a
respondents and the places where they were taken. campaign volunteer for or employed or retained in any
The announcement must state that it Is unofficial and capacity by any candidate or political party shall be
deemed resigned, if so required by their employer, or
Page 214 of 320
A TENEO CENTRAL
BAR OPERATIONS 2019 POLITICAL LAW
STATEMENT OF CONTRIBUTIONS ANO EXPENSES 1. Each certificate of canvass was executed, signed,
Every candidate and treasurer of the polltical party shall, thumb-marked by the Chair · and transmitted to
within 30 days after the day of the election, file in duplicate Congress;
with the offices of the Commission the full, true and
2. Each certificate contains the names of all candidates·
and votes in words and figures
itemized statement of all contributions and expenditures in
3. No discrepancy in authentic copi~s
connection with the election.
Board of Canvassers for Senators: COMELEC en bane,
No person elected to any public office shall enter upon the and not the provincial board.
duties of his office until he hds filed the statement of
contributions and expendltures herein required. Disqualifications: e . •
1. COMPOSITION POWERS
Provincial
1. Provincial election supervisor of lawyer in the mgional Duty of Board t'f Canvassers: Purely ministerial; to
office of the COMELEC (Chairman); compile and add results as appearing in the results
2. Provincial fiscal (vice) transmitted to it.
3. Provincial superintendent of schools (member)
4. Substitute members (in order): Grounds to Challenge an Illegal Voter:
a. Provincial auditor 1. Not registered
b. Register of Deeds . 2. Using the name of another
c. Clerk of Court nominated by executive judge 3. Suffering from existing disqualification
d. Other available appointive provincial officer
General Rule: No voter shall be required to present his
City voter's affidavit on election day.
1. City election supervisor or lawyer of COMELEC (chair) Exception: His identity is challenged.
2. City fiscal (vice) . .
3. City superintendent of schools (member) Failure to producevoter's affidavit shall not preclude him
4. Substitute members - same as provincial from voting if:
Municipal
1. Election registrar or COMELEC representative (chair)
1. His identity be shown from the photograph, fingerprints
or specimen signatures in his approved application in .i...
the book of voters. ·
2. Municipal treasurer (vice) 2. He is identified under oath by a member of the BEi and i ·
3. Most senior district school supervisor (member) such identification shall be reflected in the minutes of t ,:,
4. Or principal of the school, if absent the board.
5. Substitute members: ' :
i.,,_.;
a. Municipal administrator Grounds to Challen::1e Based on Illegal Acts:13
b. Municipal assessor 1. Vote buying
c. Clerk of Court nominated by executivejudge 2. Vote selling
d. Other available appointive municipal officers 3. Vote betting
Board of Canvassers for President and Vice· Buildings Not Valid as a Polling Place:14 .- ......
President:
1. Public or private building owned, leased or occupied l.t
Congress to determine the authenticity and due execution by any candidate of any person who is related to any
of certificates of canvass. Must prove: candidate within the 4th civil degree of consanquinlty
13 14
Note: The chalienqed person sh.311 take a prescribed Note: Where no suitable public building is available,
oath before the SE! that he has not committed any of private school buildin9s may be used as polling places ~ ..
the acts alleged in the chall1:mge, after which he will be \ '
allowed to vote.
Page 216 of 320
A TENEO CENTRAL
BAR OPERATIONS2019 POLITICAL LAW
or affinity, or any officer of the government or leader of will not affect the result of the elections. (Aksyon
any political party Magsasaka-Partido Tinig ng Mesa (AKMA-PTM) v.
2. Building or surrounding premises under the actual COMELEC, G.R. 207134, 2015)
control of a private entity
3. Those located within the perimeter of or inside a The manual COCP is the official COMELEC document in
military or police camp or reservation or within a prison cases wherein the canvassing threshold is lowered. In fact,
compound ·
clear from the language of the Resolution is that the
winners, in such instances, are proclaimed "by manually
Requisites for valid transfer of venue of counting:15
(BV-NW) preparing a Certificate of Canvass and Prodamation of
Imminent threat of Yiol~nce Winning Candidates," the format for which is appended to
To Nearest school [see comment] COMELEC Resolution No. 9700. (Garcia v. COMELEC,
Unanimous vote of ~oard of Inspectors G.R. 216691, 2015)
Majority of Watchers
Casting of Votes
If there is actual danqsr, 110 need for the unanimous vote
of the BOI and assent of majority of poll watchers • The chairman of the board of election Inspectors should
sign each ballot at the back. (Sec. 24, Republic Act No.
General Rule: Voting by proxy is not allowed. 7166). The omission of such signature does not af feet
Exceptions: the validity of the ballot ( libanan v. House of
1. Illiterate
Representatives Electoral Tribunal, 283 SCRA 520;
2. Handicapped
Punzalan v. COMELEC , 289 SCRA 702; Pacris v.
General Rule: No ballots other than official ballots shall Pagalllauan, 337 SCRA 638; Malabaguio v. COMELEC
be used or counted , 346 SCRA 699; De Guzman v. Sison, 355 SCRA 69)
,. \
Exceptions:16
Failure to receive the official ballots on time
• A voter who was challenged on the ground t hat he has
There are no sufficient ballots for all registered voters
The official ballots are destroyed at such time as shall been paid for his vote or made a bet on the result of the
render it impossible to prcvide other official ballots election will be allowed to vote if he takes an oath that
hf'. did not comm it the alleged in the challenge ( Sec.
Features of Canvassing: 200, Omnibus Election Code).
1. The Board of Canvassers (BOC) is a collegial body.
2. The BOC exercises ministerial duty. • An illiterate or physically disabled voter may be assisted
3. The BOC exercises quasi-judicial functions. by a relative by affinity or consanguinity within the fourth
4. Proceedings before BOC are summary in nature. degree or any person of his confidence who belongs to
( ' 5. The BOC convenes at 6pm. the same household or ar.y member of the board of elect
6. Canvassing shall be in public. ion inspectors ( Sec. 196, Omnibus Election Code, De
7. Proceedings are continuous from day to day, without Guzman v. COMELEC, 426 SCRA 698).
interruption except to adjourn.
8. No police, army or security officer allowed withir1 50 • It is unlawful to use carbon paper, paraffin paper or other
meters from canvassing room unless called in writing means for making a copy of the contents of the ballot or
by the BOC to stay outside the room. to use any means to identify the bal lot ( Sec. 195,
9. After proclamation, eoc becomes functus officio. Omnibus Election Code ). A ballot prepared under such
circumstances should n ot be counted. ( Gutierrez v.
The proviso designating Smartmatic as the joint venture Aquino, G.R. No. L ~ 14252, February 28, 1959).
partner in charge of the technical aspect of the counting
and canvassing wares does not translate to ceding control • Absentee Voting:
·- ..I''
of the electoral process to Smartmatic. (Roque v.
• .Members of the board of election inspectors and their
COMELEC, G.R. 18845~, 2009).
substitutes may vote in the precinct where they are
assigned ( Sec. 169, Omnibus Election Code).
COMELEC is authorized by law to proclaim wmnmg
·-.. . candidates if the remaining uncanvassed election returns
Thus, a candidate who is A person whose Coe A party aggrieved by an Interlocutory order issued by a
disqualified under Section 68 has been denied due Division of the COMELEC In an election protest may not
can validly be substituted course or cancelled directly assail the order in this Court through a special civil
under Section 77 of the OEC under Section 78
action for certiorari. The remedy is to seek the review of
because he/she remains a cannot be substituted
-, the interlocutory order during the appeal of the decision of
candidate until disqualified. because he/she Is
never considered a the Division in due course. The court may have the power
Note: However, if the candidate. (Tagolino v. to re~ligw any decision, order or ruling of the COMELEC,
candidate is disqualified after HRET, G.R. 202202, limits such power to a final declslon or resolution of the
"A;._ ~-' assumption of office, he shall '2013) COMELEC en bane, and does not extend to an
vacate the position and interlocutory order issued by a Division of the COMELEC.
succession under LGC shall Note: lf the CoC of the Otherwise stated, the Court has no power to review on
apply as ruled. candidate was denied certiorari an interlocutory order or even 3 final resolution
or cancelled in due issued by a Division of the COMELEC. Where the
course after he has
Commission in division committed grave abuse of
assumed office, he
discretion or acted without or in excess of jurisdiction in
shall vacate the
position and the issuing interlocutory orders relative to an action pending
second placer will be before it and the controversy did not fall under any of the
declared as winner. instances mentioned in Section 2, Rule 3 of the COMELEC
Rules of Procedure, the remedy of the aggrieved party is
not to refer the controversy to the Commission en bane as
Page 219 of 320
ATENEO CENTRAL
BAR OPERATIONS 2019 POLITICAL LAW
this is rot permissible under its present rules but to elevate GMA did not intend to restore his right to suffrage (Risos-
it to this Court via a petition for certiorari under Rule 65 of Vida/ v. COMELEC and Estrada, G.R. No. 206666, 20:5).
the Rules of Court (Cagas v. COMELEC, G.R. 194139,
2012). The disqualification from running for public office due to
libel shall be removed after service of the five-year
Removal of Disqualification sentence, which is counted from the date the fineis paid.
(Ty-Delgado v. .'-IRET, G.R. No. 219603, 2016)
Plenary Pardon
The phrase in the presidential pardon which declares that 3. PETITION TO DECLARE FAILURE OF ELECTIONS
the person "is hereby restored to his civil and political There is a failure to elect when nobody can he declared as
rights" substantially complies with the requirement of a winner because the will of the majority has been defiled
express restoration of l1is right to hold public office, or the and cannot be ascertained.
right of suffrage. Articles 36 and 41 of the Revised i''enal
Code should be construed in a way that will give full effect When Failure of Elections May Be Declared: (SNR)
to the executive clemency granted by the President, -, ·j . Election was §uspendcd before the hour fixed by iaw
instead of indulging in an overly strict interpretation that for the ch)sing of the voting
may serve to impair or diminish the import of the pardon 2. Election in any polling place was N,ot held on the date
which emanated from the Office of the President and duly fixed
signed by the Chief Executive himself/herself. The said
3. Elections f!esults In a failure to elect (after the voting
and during tne preparatlon and transmission of the
coda! provisions must be construed to harmonize the
election returns or in the custody or canvass thereof).
power of Congress to define crimes and prescribe the
penalties for such crimes and the power of the President
Grounds: (V-F2AT)
to grant executive clemency. All that the said provislons force majeure
impart is that the pardon of the principal penalty does not .Eraud
carry with it the remission of the accessory penalties Y,iolence
unless the President expressly includes Said accessory Ierrorism
penalties in the pardon. It still recognizes the Presidential Analogous circumstances
prerogative to grant executive clemency and, specifically,
to decide to pardon the principal penalty while excluding its Conditions to Annul an Election: (WIG)
accessory penalties or to pardon both. Thus, Articles 36 Winner cannot be determined
!!legality must affect more than 50% of the votes cast
and 41 only clarify the effect of the pardon so decided upon
2ood votes cannot be distinguished from the bad votes
by the President on the penalties imposed in accordance
with law (Risos-Vidal v. COMELEC, G.R. 206666, 2015).
FAILURE
POSTPONEMENT
A whereas clause In a pardon which states that the person OF
OF ELECTIONS
"publicly committed to no longer seek any elective position ELECTIONS
or office" does not make the pardon conditional. Whereas Any SERIOUS cause 1.Force majeure
clauses do not forrn part of a statute because, strictly of: · Violence
speaking, they are not part of the operative language of the Force majeure Fraud ,•.
statute. The whereas clause is not an integral part of t'le Violence Terrorism 1._j
' decree of the pardon, and therefore, does not by itself Grounds Terrorism Analogous
alone operate to make the pardon conditional or to make Loss or destruction of
its effectlvity contingent upon the fulfillment of the election
aforementioned commitment nor to limit the scope of the paraphernalia
Analogous
pardon (Risos-Vidal v. COMELl•G, G.R. 206666, 2015).
Serious and Failure to elect
Former President Estrada was granted an absolute pardon Extent of impossibility to have and affects·
f,
that fully restored all his civil and political rights, which Cause free and orderly results of >.:....,
naturally includes the right to seek public elective office. elections elections
The wording of the pardon extended to him is complete,
Grounds must exist Grounds may
unambiguous, and unqualified. The fact that the pardon did Conditions
before voting occur anytime :"
not specify the specific rights restored does not mean that
----- 't \)
'---'--------------·- _ .. _, __
. •} j :•.-·
ATENEO CENTRAL
BAR OPERATIONS 2019 POLITICAL LAW
---·----------------.,--b-1--------~T~w-o-::O~b~J·e~c~ti~o~n~R~u~l~e--~S~u~b:m:i;t~o~rajl;c;~~e;ci;,io~n~a;n~dr;;:w;.ritttte;;n
For national officials, the only grounds avai a e ere:
_ Illegal composition or proceedings of the board of objection simultaneously to BOC chairper~n befor~ ERs
canvassers -, have been canvassed. There is substantial compliance
_ "Manifest Errors" - Matters regarding the preparation, even if the oral objection is filed first, then the written
transmission, receipt, custody, and appreciation election objection with evidence is submitted within 24 h~urs.
returns shall be brought, in the first instance, before the
boards of canvassers, not the COMELEC (Fernandez vs. However, ir. Marabur vs. COMELEC, the Court held that
COMELEC, G.R. No. 171821, 2006). there is substantial compliance if despite the absence of a
written objection, an offer of evidence is made within the
Generai Rule: COMELEC cannot go behind the face of an
election return. It is beyono the jurisdiction of COMELEC 24-hour period (Maraburvs. COMELEC, G.R. No. 169513,
to go beyond the face of the returns or investigate electlon 2007).
irregularttles. ·
Exception: When there is prima fade showing that the ER Summary Nature:
is not genuine. • Pre-proclamation controversies shall be heard
e.g., as when several entries have been omitted (Lee vs. summarily by the COMELEC.
COMELEC, G.R. No 157004, 2003). • Its decision shall be executory after 5 days from receipt
by the losing party of the decision, unless restrained
Grounds For Material Defects: by the SC.
1. Omission of name of candidates
2. Omission of votes for candidates General Rule: Pre-proclamation cases are deemed
terminated:
Material Defect v. Falsified/Tampered 1. At ihe beginning of the term of the office involved and
the rulings of the BOC concerned deemed affirmed.
MATERIAL DEFECT ERs HAVE BEEN 2. This is without prejudice to the filing of a regular
IN THE ERs FALSIFIED/ TAMPERED election protest by the aggrieved party.
Exceptions: Proceedings may continue if:
BOC needs authority BOC needs no prior 1. COMELEC determines that the petition is meritorious
from COMELEC to get permission from the and issues an order fo, the proceedings to continue.
copies of the other ERs COMELEC to get copies of 2. The SC issues an order for the proceedings to
the other ERs continue in a petition for certiorari.
General Rule: When the Electoral Tribunal obtains But the remedy of filing a pre-proclamation case is still
jurisdiction, it precludes the COMELEC from exercising available after prcclamation if the proclamation should
powers over pre-proclamation controversies. have been suspended because of ccntested election
Exceptions: (PAPI-Q) returns (Jainc1f vs. Comelec, G.R. No. 174551, 2007).
1 . BOC was [mproperly constituted
'2. Proclamation was null and void Grounds for Recount:
3. Quo warranto is Ml the proper remedy 1. Material defects in the ERs
4. What was filed was a fetition to annul a proclamation, 2. ERs are tampered or falsified
and not quo warranto or election protest. 3. Discrepancies in the ERs
5. Election contest expressly made without prejudice to
PPC or it was made Ad cautelam (cautionary). When Recount is Possible:
1. COMELEC order BEi to conduct recount
In exercising Its powers and jurisdiction, as defined by its 2. Integrity and identity of ballot box is not violated
mandate to protect the integrity of elections, the 3. BEi ascertains that integrity of ballots in box preserved
COMELEC "must not be straight-jacketed by procedural 4. BEi recounts and complete/correct returns
rules in resolving election disputes." (V/o/ago v. ·
COMELEC. G.R. 194143, 2011).
In regular election contests, the general averment of fraud Notwithstanding the pende.ncy of any pre-proclamation
or irregularities in the counfnq of votes justifies the •. controversy, the Commission may summarily order the
examination of the ballots and recounting of votes. This proclamation of other winning candidates whose election
process of examination is the revision of the ballots will r::>t be affected by the outcome of the controversy.
pursuant to Section 6, Rule 20 of the 1993 COMELEC
Rules of Procedure. The protests involved herein assailed An aggrieved party may file a petition for certiorari with the
Iha authenticity of the election returns and the veracity of COMELEC whenever a judge hearing an election case has
the counting of lhe ballots. In that regard, the ballots acted without or in excess of his Jurisdiction or with grave
themselves are the best evidence. The only means to abuse of discretion and there is no appeal, nor any plain,
overcome the presumption of legitimacy of the election speedy, and adequate remedy In the ordinary course of
returns is to examine and determine first whether the ballot law. (Bu/ilis v. Nuez, G.R. No. 195953, 2011).
boxes have been substantially preserved in the manner
mandated by law. Hence, the necessity to issue the order ELECTION CONTESTS
of revision" (Tolentino vs. COMELEC, G.R. No. 187958,
20101) An election contest is any adversary proceeding by which
matters invotving title or claim of title to an elective office,
Statistically Improbable Data made before or after the proclamation of the winner, is
1. Uniformity of tally in favor of candidates belonging to 1 settled whether or not contestant is claiming office in
party. dispute. (Javier v. COMELEC, G.R. Nos. L-68379-81,
2. Systematic blanking out of candidates belonging to September 22, 1986)
another party.
Kinds Of Election Contests:
General Rule: Pre-proclamation cases are NOT allowed 1. Election Protest
in elections for the President, Vice President, Senator and 2. Quo Warranto
members of the House of Representatives.
Exceptions: Objective: To dislodge the winning candidate from office
1. Manifest Errors in the ERs, or COCs may be corrected and determine the true winner.
motu propio or upon written complaint of any interested
person. Withdrawal of nomination and substitution by another
2. Questions affecting the composition or proceedings of nominee is neither an election protest nor an action for
the board of canvassers may be initiated in the board quo warranto. Petitioner correctly brought before the
or directly with the Commission in accordance with Supreme Court this special civil action for certiorari under
Section 19 (RA 7166). · Section 7 of Article IX-A of the 1987 Constitution,
notwithstanding the proclamation of, and assumption of
Manifest Errors: office by, the substitute nominee. (Lokin, Jr. v. COMELEC
1. Mistake in adding G.R. 179431-32/180443, 2010).
2. Mistake in copying of figures from ER or Statement of
Votes COMELEC Jurlstllctlon Over Election Contests:
3. ERs from non-existent precinct canvassed 1. Original Jurisdiction over contests relating to elections,
4. Copy of ER tabulated more than twice returns, and qualifications of all elective:
5. 2 or more copies. of ER and COC in 1 precinct counted a. Regional
separately b. Provincial
c. City officials
The grounds for manifest errors are inclusive. 2. Appellate Jurisdiction over contests involving:
a. Elective Municipal officials decided by trial courts
The allowable margin of error is 60%. of general jurisdiction
b. Elective Barangay officials decided by trial courts
,.___-
{°': of limited jurisdiction
It suspends the running of the period within which to file an
c. COMELEC may issue extraordinary writs of
election protest or quo warranto proceeding. certiorari, prohibition and mandamus
A petition for mandamus will lie aqainst the Speaker of the
House and the House Secretary General for not
18 Note: The COMELEC did not commit grave abuse of resolving whether 16 of those 44 ballots should be
discretion when it ordered the revision of 44 ballots included in the revision.
with the Senate Electoral Tribunal without first
~.. ,.; Page 223 of 320
ATENEO CENTRAL
BAR OPERATIONS 2019 POLITICAL LAW
performing their ministerial duties to administer the oath of Grounds For Election Protest: (IN MVP)
the second placer and enter his name in the Roll of 1. .M,isappreciation ·
Members of the House of Representatives, when the 2. Violence
winner's COC had been cancelled due to ineligibility. 3. intimidation
( Velasco v. Belmonte, G.R. 211140, 2016) 4. Ho padlock
5. fadding of votes
Pre-proclamation Controversy v. Election Contest
House of Representatives Electoral Tribunal
Jurisdiction Over Election Contests
PRE-PROCI.AMATION ELECTION
CONTROVERSY . CONTEST The House of Representatives has the jurisdiction to
question the qualification of the nominees of party-list
Before proclamation of After proclamation of organizations. Although party list organizations are voted
candidate candidate for in the elections, still it is not the organizations which sit
~~~~-+-~~~~~~~-;
and become members cf the House cf Representatives but
Jurisdiction of COMELEC is Jurisdiction of
administrative or quasi-judicial COMELEC is quasi- their nominees. Subsequently, Section 17, Article VI of the
judicial Constitution provides that the HRET shall be the sole judge
of all contests relating, among others, to the qualifications ·
of the members of the House. Thus, since party list
• Only real parties In interest can file and pursue election
protests.19 nominees are considered as "elected members" of the
Even if It was the 2nd placer who filed the election House, the HRET has jurisdiction to hear and pass upon
protest, the 3rd placer may :!.till possibly win.20 their qualifications (Abayon v. HRET, G.R. 189466, 2012).
Requisites for an Election Protest General Rule: Ballots are the best and most conclusive
1. Filed by candidate who has filed a COC and has been evidence in an election contest where the correctness of
voted upon for the same offic:e.21 the number of votes of each candidate is involved (Delos
2. Filed within 10 days from proclamation of results Reyes v. COMELEC, G.R. No. 170070, 2007).
a. Period to file EP is suspended during pendency of Exception: Election returns are the best evidence when
PPC
the ballots are lost, destroyed, tampered or fake.
b. A counter-protest must also comply with the
reglementc.1ry period
3. On grounds of: Exec•Jtion Pending Appeal:23
1. Public interest is involved or will of the electorate
a. election fraud/terrorism, and
2. Length of time that the election contest has been
b. irregularities or illegal acts before, dur;ng, or after
pending
casting and counting of votes
3. Shortness of the remaining portion of the term of the
Additional Requirements: contested office. (Pecson v, COMELEC, G.R. 182865,
1. Payrnent of docket fee22 2008).
('
2. Certificate of ~Jon-Forum Shopping
General Rub: The COMELEC cannot proclaim as winner
the candidate who obtains the 2nd highest number of
votes in case the winning candidate is ineligible or
disqualified. When a winner is declared ineligible, the
candidate who finished 2nd cannot assume the position
(Quizon v. COMELEC, G.R. 177927, 2008) ( :
Exception: . ,;,;
19 21
Note: A real party in interest is the party who would be Note: Special rule for PET: Only the 2nd or 3rd placer
benefited or injured by the judgment and the party who may file the protest
is entitled to the avails of the suit. e.g. candidate of the 22
Note: Failure to pay is ground to dismiss the case.
same position
20
Note: The case of presidential protest cases, only two
Except when there is estoppel by the other party, by
not raising the ground promptly.
,. .
persons, the 2nd and 3rd placers, may contest the , 73
~. .3
Note: A combination of 2 or more will suffice to allow
election (Poe vs. Macapogal-Arroyo, PET Case No. · execution pending appeal, but shortness of the
003, 2005). remaining period alone is not a ground for execution
pending appeal
Page 224 of 320
ATENEO CENTRAL
BAR OPERATIONS2019 POLITICAL LAW
·~.. ,:
24 Note: Not penalized if done to promote efficiency in
government service. ·
-.:.. ... : Page 225 of 320
·-·---- -·-···--·-· -------· ·------------------
ATENEO CENTRAL
BAR OPERATIONS 20"19 POLITICAL LAW
The prohibition on transfer or detail covers any movement 15. Receiving COC out of allowed !ime and making it
of personnel from one station to another, whether or not in appear it was filed on time; or coercing the officer to
the same office or aqency when made or caused during perform this act
the election period, and includes reassignment. (Aquino v. 16. Interfering with B.adio or TV broadcast of lawful political
program
COMELEC, G.R. 211789-90, 2015)
17. Soliciting votes on election Q.ay
If the reassignment orders are issued prior to the start of Under the present law, the COMELEC and other
the election period, they are automatically rendered prosecuting arms of the government, such as the DOJ,
beyond the coverage of the pr~hibition and the issuing
now exercise concurrent jurisdiction in the investigation
official cannot be held liable for violation of Section 261 (h)
and prosecution of election offenses (Arroyo v. Departrr.ent
of BP 881. (Aquino v. COMELEC, G.R. 211789-90, 2015)
of Justice G.R199082, 2013).
Retention of duties and temporary discharge of additional' Other Election Offenses Under R.A. No. 6646:
duties do not contemplate or involve any movement of 1. Causing the printing of official ballots and election
personnel, whether under any of the various forms of returns by printing establishments not on contract with
personnel action enumerated under the laws governing the COMELEC and printing establishments which
civil service or otherwise. Hence, they are not covered by undertakes unauthorized printing
the legal prohibition on transfers or detail. (Aquino v. 2. Tampering, Increasing or decreasing the votes
COMELEC, G.R. 211789-90, 2015) received by a candidate or refusing after proper
verification and hearing to credit the correct votes or
Elements of Violation of Sec 261 (h) of the Omnibus deduct the tampered votes (committ€d by a member
Election Code (Transfer of Officers and Employees in of the board of election inspectors)
the Civil Service): 3. Refusing to issue the certificate of voters to the duly
1. Fact of transfer or cJetail within election period; · accredited watchers (committed by a member of the
2. Transfer or detail made without prior approval of BEi)
COMELEC. 4. Violating provisions against prohibited forms of
election propaganda
Full List of Election Offenses Under Sec. 68 of the 5. Failure to give notice of meetings to other members of
OEC (D2T4R-VS3· P4MC; same grounds for the board, candidate or political party (committed by
disqualification): · the Chairman of the board of canvassers)
1. Yote-buying 6. A person who has been declared a nuisance candidate
2. Acts of Terrorism or is otherwise disqualified who continues to
3. .§.pending in excess of allowable limit misrepresent himself as a candidate and any publlc
4. §.oliciting. receiving, or making prohibited contributions offlcer or private individual who knowingly induces or
5. Campaigning outside feriod abets such misrepresentation by commission or
6. Iamper with election propaganda omission.
7. If the chairman of the BEi fails to affix his signature at f:
7. frohibited election propaganda .
the back of the official ballot, in the presence of the
,....,
8. Coercing §.ubordinates to aid, campaign, or vote.for a
candidate
9. Using J:hreat, intimidation, terrorism, fraudulent,
voter, before delivering the ballot to the voter.
{ :
devises Prescription of Election Offenses:
10. Soliciting votes or electioneering during registration 1. Election offenses prescribe after 5 years from the date
day and election day within felling place or within 30m of their commission.
radius 2. If the discovery of the offense is made in ail election
11 . Public official or employee who releases, disburses, or contest proceeding, the period of prescription shall
expends Eublic funds 45 days before election or 30 commence on the date which the judgment in such
days: before special election proceedings becomes final and executory.
.·· ....
12. Political party holds political ~onventions or meetings ! I
to nominate official candidates earlier than allowed ELECTION AUTOMATION LAW (R.A. NO. 8436 AS •.......,,i
·-----------····-··· ·- .
ATENEO CENTRAL
BAR OPERATIONS 2019 POLITICAL LAW
PAPER-BASEDELECTION SYSTEM v. DIRECT ·.. The voter himself or herself verifies the accuracy or the
RECORD ELECTIONSYSTEM vote. In instances of Random Manual Audit and election
protests, the WPAT becomes the best source of raw data
PAPER-BASED DIRECT RECORD
for 'votes (Bagumbayan-VNP Moveme11t, Inc. v.
ELECTION SYSTEM ELECTRONIC ELECTION
SYSTEM COMELEC, G.R. No. 222731, March 8, 2016)
SOURCE CODE
ATENEO CENTRAL
BAR OPERATIONS 2019 POLITICAL LAW
Public Corporation
r
Juridical entities or agencies formed or organized for the l
·------------ -····· - ..
ATENEO CENTRAL
BAR OPERATIONS 2019 POLITICAL LAW
Public v. Private v. Quasi-Public As a rule, the government and its attached agencies are
exempted from appeal bonds because it is presumed that
PUBLIC PRIVATE QUASI-PUBLIC
the State is always solvent. This exemption however does
Created by the Private Created by will of not apply to GOCCs. Thus, while a GOCC's majority
State through corporations that incorporators with stockholder, the State, will always be presumed solvent,
the Congress, are required by the recognition of the presumption does not necessarily extend to the GOCC
the President law to render the State. itself. However, when a GOCC performs a governmental
or the public service or function there is the assurance 'that the government will
Judiciary supply wants necessarily fund its primary functions. Thus, a GOCC that
is sued in relation to its governmental functions may be,
under appropriate circumstances, exempted from the
(a) Distinguished from government-owned and
controlled organizations payment of appeal fees. In this case, BBC Is a GOCC
Government-Owned or Controlled Corporations performing not a governmental function but a proprietary
(GOCC) • refer to any agency c,rganized as a stock or non- function which is to engage In commercial television
stock corporation, vested with functions relating to public broadcasting. As such, It is not exempted from appeal
needs whether gov~rnmental or proprietary in nature and bonds (Banahaw Broadcasting Corporation v. Pacana,
owned directly by the government or through its G.R. 171673, 2011).
instrumentalities.
Radio Philippines Network, Inc. (RPN) Is not a GOCC.
GOCCs are owned by the Government directly or through Under the Administrative Code of 1987, a GOCC is that
its instrumentalities either wholly or, where applicable as in which refers to any agency organized as a stock or non-
the case of stock corporations, to the extent of at least fifty. stock corporation vested with functions relating to public
one (51) per cent of its capital stock. (Administrative Code, · needs whether governmental or proprietary in nature, and
Sec. 2, Par. 13). owned by the government directly or indirectly through its
instrumentalities either wholly, or wt:ere applicable as in
A GOCC created through a special charter must meet the case of stock corporations, to the extent of at least 51 %
two conditions namely: of its capital stock. Although there is a controversy as to
1. it must be established for common good: and the amount of shares transferred to the government,
2. it must meet the test of economic viability. ($ecfion administrative agencies, such as the PCGG and Office of
· 16, Article XII, 1987 Constitution). the President agree, that RPN is not a GOCC. Considering
that the construction of a statute given by administrative
May be further categorized by the DBM, CSC, and the
agencies deserves respect, the uniform administrative
COA for purposes of the exercise and discharge of their
constructions of the relevant aforementioned laws defining
respective powers and functions.
what are GOCCs as applied to RPN is highly persuasive.
(Carandang v. Deslerto, G.R. 148076, 2011).
They shall be attached to the appropriate department with
which they have allied functions or as may be provided by The structure of the Philippine National Red Cross is sui
executive order.
' generis being neither strictly private nor public in nature.
(Uban, et al. v. Gordon, G.R. 175352, 2011)
At least 1/3 of the members of the Boards of such
corporations should either be a Secretary, Undersecretary 2. CLASSIFICATIONS
....: ~
....
or Assistant Secretary.
Quasi-Corporations
A local water district is a government-owned and controlled
corporation with special charter since it is created pursuant Quasi-corporations - Public corporations created by law
to a special law. PD 198 constitutes the special charter by as agencies of the State for a narrow and limited purpose.
virtue cf which local water districts exist. Unlike private
corporations that derive their legal existence and power Such quasi-corporations are described as bodies of
citizens who have no personal nor private interests to be
from the Corporation Code, water districts derive their legal
subserved, but are simply required by the State to do some
existence and power from PD 198. (Felici.ino v. Gison,
public work. The State merely clothes one of its agencies
G.R. 165641, 2010).
or instrumentalities with such corporate powers. It is
neither a private corporation but a class of artificial entity.
(J. Padilla Dissent, Fontanilla v. Maliaman, G.R. L- benefit and advantage of the community. it is in this
55963/61045, 1991). character that they are acting as a separate entity for their
own purposes and not as a subdivision of the State ·
Quasi-corporations are NOT the same as quasi-public
corporation Types of Municipal Corporations
Quasi-corporations are NOT the same as quasi-public Municipal corporation by Prescription - those that
corporations. Quasi-corporations are classified as public exercised their powers from time immemorial without
corporations created by the State for a limited purpose, objection from the government, that although no charter
while quasi-public corporations are private corporations exists, it is presumed to have been duly incorporated and
that render public service. Quasi-public corporations, on had been lost or destroyed
the other hand, is a private corporation which obtained a When existence presumed
franchise to supply public needs. An example of a ouasi- the community has claimed and exercised corporate
public corporation ls PLDT.
functions;
-, with legislature's knowledgl:3 and acquiescence; and
Specie of Private Corporations
without objection or interruption for a period long enough
A quasi-public corporation is a species of private to afford title by prescription .
corporations, but the qualifying factor Is the type of service 1. De Jure Municipal Corporation - those created or
the former renders to the public. If it performs a public · recognized by operation of law
service, ther. it becomes a quasi-public corporation.
2. De Facto Municipal Corporation - those where the
(Philippine Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals
people have organized themselves under color of law,
v. COA, G.R. No. 169752, September 25, 2007).
into ordinary municipal bodies exercising their powers,
with their rights dependent quite as much as on
Municipal Corporation
acquiescence as on the rept;larity of their origin
Municipal Corporation - public corporation established by
1aw partly as an agent of the State to assist in civil Requisites for creation, conversion, division, merger
government but chiefly to regulate and administer the local or dissolution
affairs of the city, town or district which is incorporated. · Requisites of a municipal corporation by prescription
(CLAW)
MUNICIPAL CORPORATIONS 1. fommunity claimed and exercised corporate functions
2. With knowledge and ~cquiescence of the Legislature
Elements (LITC): 3. Without interruption or ob;ection
1. A ,begal creation or incorporation; . 4. For a period .bong enough to afford it title by
2. A &,orporate name by which the artificial personality or prescription
legal entity is known in which all corporate acts are ~·
~, . .
done Requisites of a de facto municipal corporation (GLAC)
3. !nhabitants constituting the population 1. Valid 1,.aw authorizing incorporation !
4. Ierritory 2. Attempt in !i_ood faith to organize under it
3. £olorable compliance with law
Nature and Functions (SID) 4. ~ssumption of corporate powers '•..:,.:.-
sovereignty of the State. It includes the us of legislative, In a de jure municipal corporation, it is its valid
executive and judicial powers. incorporation that makes it impregnable to any attack,
q
'
.
essentially legislative in nature. [Pelaez v, Auditor General, There is no need for any plebiscite in the creation,
G.R. No. L-23825 (1965)] dissolution or any other similar action on the following:
,,..........
•\
Legislative Districts: Legislative districts are not political
The enactment of a LGC is not a sine qua non for the subdivisions through which functions of the government
creation of a municipality, and before the enactment of are carried out. [Bagabuyo v. COMELEC, G.R. No. 176970
such, the power remains plenary except that creation (2008))
should be approved in a plebiscite. [Torralba v. Sibagat, Administrative Regior,s: Administrative regions are not
G.R. No. L-59180 (1987)) territorial and political subdivisions. The power to create
and merge administrative regions rs traditionally vested in
', ) Plebiscite Requirement the President. Hence, the merger ot' provinces that did not
vote for inclusion in the ARMM into existing administrative
In accordance with criteria set by the LGC, no province,
regions does not require a plebiscite. [See Abbas v.
city, municipality or barangay may be created, divided,
rnerged, abolished or its boundary substantially altered, COMELEC, G.R. No. 89651 (1989)1
\ .....
except in accordance with the criteria established in the
LGC and subject to approval by a majority of the votes cast "Material change" as standard
in a plebiscite in the political units affected. (CONST. If the creation, division, merger, abolition or substantial
ART.X, Sec.10} alteration of boundaries of an LGU will cause a material
(·,, ..~
change in the political and economic rights of a political
The plebiscite must be conducted by COMELEC within unit, the residents of such political unit should have the
120 days from the date of effectivity of the law or ordinance right to participate in the required plebiscite. [Miranda v.
effecting such action, unless said law or ordinance fixes Aguirre (1999)1
another date. (LGC, Sec.10)
(, }" Hence, in the conversion of a component city to a highly
' ... .;,
Plebiscite must be "in the political units directly urbanized city, the residents of the province must
affected" participate. The conversion of the city will, among others,
result in reduction in trucing jurisdiction and reduced
When the law states that the plebiscite shall be conducted
(i j: "in the political units directly affected," it moans that the economic viability of the province. {Umali v. COMELEC,
·~.. ,
residents of the political entity who would be economically G.R No. 203974 (2014)1
dislocated by the separation of a portion thereof have the '
right to vote in said plebiscite. [Padilla v. COMELEC, G.R. But the inhabitants of a neighboring city (e.g. San Juan)
No. 103328 (1992)] are ~roperly excluded from a plebiscite concerning the
-------··-···
ATENEO CENTRAL
BAR OPERATIONS 2019
POLITICAL LAW
conversion of a city (e.g. Mandaluyong) to a t;,ghly Commences upon the election and qualification of its chief
urbanized city. [See Tobias v. Abalos (1994)1 executive and a majority of members of the Sanggunian,
unless some other time is fixed by the law or ordinance
'
Indicators for the creation or conversion of LGU (LIP) creating it.
1. ,band Area
2. [ncorne Dissolution of Municipal Corporations
3. f opulation Dissolved by a repeal of the charter
As a result of:
ccnslderauone in the creation of local government 1. Annexation,
units 2. Merger,
3. Consolidation,
The central policy considerations in the creation of local 4. Division.
government units are economic viability, · efficient
administration and capability to deliver basic services to Specific Requirements
constituents. The criteria prescribed by the LGC (income,
population, and land area) are all designed to accomplish Income Population Land Area
these results. The primordial consideration in the creation
of local government units, particularly a province is Average Total Generally,
annual number of must be
economic viability. (Navarro v. Ermita, G.R. 180050, 2011).
income for inhabitants contiguous
the last 2 within
The creation, division, merger, abolition, or substantial consecutive LGU's
alteration of boundaries of LGU should be approved by a years territory
majority of the votes cast in a plebiscite cailed for the
purpose in the political unit or units directly affected. Compliance Department NSO land
attested by of Finance Management
'Boundaries' Bureau
"Boundaries" in Sec 10, Art Xis NOT limited to the physical Province P20M 250,000 2,000 sq.km
metes and bounds of the LGU, but also to its political (1991
boundaries. In one case, a city was converted into an HUC Prices)
which resulted in material changes in the economic and
Highly P50M 200,000 100 sq.km.
political rights of the people and LGUs, thus, the plebiscite Urbanized (1991
requirement under Sec 10, Art X should apply. The entire City Prices)
province stands to be directly a~ected by the conversion
hence should be included in the plebiscite. (Naval v. Component P100M 150,000 100 sq.km.
COMELEC, 2014) City (2000
prices)
Division and Merger cif LGUs Municipality P2.5M 25,000 SO sq.km.
Division shall not reduco the income, population, lanr:I area (1991
of the LGU to less than the minimum requirement prices)
prescribed. Income classification should not fall below the
Baran gay No 2,000 or No
current income classification prior to division (Local
requirement 5,000 if requirement
Government Code, sec. 8)
Metro except for
Manila or contiguity
Abolition of LGU HUCSs
When income, population, or land areas are irreversibly
reduced to less than the minimum standards prescribed for
creation as certified by the national agencies concerned.
The law or ordinance abclishing LGU shall specify the
province, city, municipality or barangay with whi<:h the LGU
sought to be abolished will be incorporated or merged.
(Local Government Code, sec. 9)
'---------------······..·· -·--
ATENEO CENTRAL
BAR OPERATIONS 2019 POLITICAL LAW
Which requirement must be satisfied? No. The principle of local autonomy under the Constitution
'simply means 'decentralization'. It does not make the local
Province or City 1. Income and
government sovereign within a State or an imperium in
2. Either population or land area
lmpeio. (Basco v. PAGCOR, GR No 91649, May 14, 1991)
Municipality 1. Income
2. Population and Devolution - it refers to the act by which the national
3. Land area government confers power upon the various LGUs to
perform specific functions. It is mandatory under the LGC.
Barangay 1. Population and
2. Territorial Contiguity
---- Decentralization - it is the devolution of national
administration, not power, to the local levels, in which local
A. PRINCIPLES OF LOCAL AUTONOMY officials rernaln accountable to the central government in
the manner the law may provide.
Section 2, Art. X of the Constitution provides that LGUS
"shall enjoy local autonomy." This is decentralization of
administration and not decentrallzatlon of power. (Limbona DECENTRA-
DEVOLUTION
LIZATION
v. Conte Mange/in, G.R. 80391, 1989)
Political Administrative
Both are
Declaration of Policy decentrali- decentralize-
decentralize-lion
The territorial and political subdivisions of the State shall zation tion
enjoy genuine and meaningful local autonomy to enable Transfer of
them to attain their fullest development as self-reliant personnel, Both involve
communities and make them more effective partners in the funds/asset, transter from Transfer of
attainment of national goals. delivery of basic national powers/
The State shall provide for a more responsive and services, government to functions only
accountable local government structure instituted through regulatory LGU
a system of decentralization whereby local government powers
units shall be given more powers, authority, Recipients of
responsibilities, and resources. Both have its
powers: field
Recipients of source of power
The State shall ensure the accountability of local offices/regional
powers: LGU from the national
government units through the institution of effective offices of the
government
mechanisms of recall, initiative and referendum. I same agencies
All national agencies are required to conduct periodic Powers are No enumeration
consultations with the appropriate tGUs, NGOs, people's specific; LGC Thf!re must be a of powers
orqanizations and other concerned sectors before any enumeration Is law for both needed in the
project or program is implemented in their respective exclusive LGC
jurisdictions. [Sec. 2, LGC]
LGU cannot
assume a
Local government unit- a political subdivision constituted
national President or
by law and possessed of substantial control over its own
government department
affairs. Both have a
power not given itself
deadline for
to it. It may only determines
Local autonomy - can be considered a measure of effectivity - 6
do sc when what powers
decentralization of the functions of government. This months
power is will be
means that local governments have certain powers given delegated delegated
by the Constitution which may not be curtailed by the (devolved
national government, beyond these, local gcvernments power)
may not enact ordinances contrary to the statute.
(BERNAS)
. . .. ·
.
. '
ATENEO CENTRAL
BAR OPERATIONS 2019
POLITICAL LAW
Limitation on LGU's local autonomy action or step as judgment of the latter for
The President shall exercise general supervision over local prescribed by law to make that of the former.
governments them perform their duties
Even as the Constitution guarantees autonomy to local Supervising officials
government units, the exercise of local autonomy is still merely see to it that the
subject to the power of control by Congress. (Dadcle v Officers in control lay down rules are followed, but they
GOA, GR No 125350, December 3, 2002) the rules in the themselves do not lay
performance or down such rules, nor do
Levels of Decentralization or Kinds of Autonomy accomplishment of an act. they have the discretion to
1. Administrative Autonomy or Decentralization of If these rules are not modify or replace them. If
Administration- the central government delegates followed, they may, in their the rules are not observed,
administrative powers to the political subdivisions. discretion, order the act they may order the work
Purposes for delegatl,:m: (BD-MNR) undone or redone by their done or redone, but only to
1. To ~roaden the local power base subordinates . or even conform to such rules.
2. To make the units more Responsive and accountable decide to do it themselves. They may not prescribe
3. To ensure the full .Qevelopment of LGUs into self- their own manner of
reliant communities execution of the act.
4. To break the .Monopoly of the national government
over managing local affairs Supervisory power of National Gov't over LGU
5. To relieve: the National g0vernment from the burden
of managing local affairs National government agencies exercise only supervisory
powers over LGUs. The power of review is part of·
2. Political autonomy or Decentrnlization of Power - supervision; if there is no enabling law. no such power of
involves the abdication of political power in favor of LGUs review will be granted to national government agencies.
declared to be autonomous.
It would amount to self-immolation because the Scope of Power of Supervislon
autonomous government would become accountable The power of supervision carries with it the power to
to its constituency, not to the central government.
investigate and discipline to see to it that laws are
effectively carried out.
3. Deconcentration - it is the transfer of power, authority
or responsibility , or the discretion to plan, ctecide, and
manage from central point or local levels, but within the President's power over LGUs
central or national government itself. The nature of the The President has only the power of supervision over
transfer is administrative and the approach is sectoral. LGUs. He cannot interfere with the local governments as
long as they act within the scope of their authority.
4. Debureaucrati:tation - it is the transfer of some public
functions and responsibilities , which the government may The President exercisos direct supervision over provinces,
perform, to private entities or NGOs, it is people's highly urbanized cities and independent component cities.
empowerment or participation in local governance. · He exercises Indirect supervision over component cities
and municipalities through the provinces. He also
' \
ATENEO CENTRAL
BAR OPERATIONS 2019 POLITICAL LAW
b. economic and social structures, and c. Section 3, Article 1/: General Welfare Clause:
c. other relevant characteristics. Section 3. The Bangsamoro Government shall
exercise the powers expressly granted, those
(Section 16) The President shall exercise general necessarily implied therefrom, as well as powers
supervision over autonomous regions to ensure that laws necessary, appropriate, or incidental for its efficient
are faithfully executed. and effective governance and these which are
essential to the promotion of general welfare.
(Section 18) An organic act shall be enacted for each Within its territorial jurisdiction, the Bangsamorb
autonomous region with the asslstance and participation of Government shall ensure and support, among
the regional consultative coinrnlssion composed of other things, the preservation and enrichment of.
representatives appointed by the President from a list of culture, promote health and safety, enhance the
nominees from multi-sectoral bodies. right of the people to a balanced ecology,
encourage and support the development of
This would define the basic structure of government for the appropriate and self-reliant scientific and
region, and special courts with personal, family, and technological capabillties, improve public morals,
property law jurisdiction consistent with the provisions of enhance economic prosperity and social justice,
this Constitution and national laws. promote full employment among Its residents,
maintain peace and order, and preserve the
To create an auionnmous region, a majority of the comfort and convenience of its inhabitants.
votes cast by the consfltuent units in a plebiscite d. The President may suspend the Chief Miriister for
called for the purpose is required. Only those a period not exceeding six (6) months for willful
provinces, cities. and geographic areas voting violation of the Constitution, national laws, or this
favorably in such plebiscite shall be lncluded in the Organic Law.
autonomous re ion. e. This created the National Government-
Bangsamoro Government Intergovernmental
(Section 20) The organic act of autonomous reqionsshall Relations Body. hereinafter referred to as
provide for legislative powers over: "Intergovernmental Relations Body," to coordinate
(1) Administrative organization; · and resolve issues on intergovernmental relations
(2) Creation of sources of revenues; through regular consultation and continuing
(3) Ancestral domain and natural resources; negotiation in a non-adversarial manner.
(4) Personal, family, and property relations; f. Unresolved issues shall be elevated to the
(5) Regional urban and rural planning development; President, through the Chief Minister.
(6) Economic, social, and tourism development; g. The National Government and the Banasamoro
(7) Educational policies; Government shall each appoint representatives to
(8) Preservation and development of the cultural the Intergovernmental Relations Body. The
heritage; and Intergovernmental Relations Bocly shall be
(9) Such other matters as may be authorized by law for · supported by a Joint secretariat.
the promotion of the general welfare of the people of h. Bangsamoro Participation In National
the region. Government.- As far as practicable, the
Bangsamoro Government shall be represented in
Section 21. The preservation of peace and order within the the departments, offices, commissions, agencies
regions shall be the responsibllity of the local police and bureaus of the National Government that \ ..:
agencies which shall be organized, maintained, ' implement and enforce policies, programs, and
supervised, and utilized in accordance with applicable projects of the National Government in the
laws. Bangsamoro Autonomous Region.
i. The defense and security of the Bangsamoro (.'·-
"-·::-
RA 11054: Organic Law for the Bangsamoro Auton9mous Region shall be the responsibility of
Autonomous Region in Muslim Mindanao the National Government.
a. Bangsamoro People, defined: Those who, at the j. This act also provides for an Annual Block Grant.
advent of the Spanish colonization, were The National Government shall provide an annual
considered natives or original inhabitants of block grant which shall be the share of the
Mindanao and the Sulli archipelago and its Bangsamorc Government in the national internal
adjacent islands, whether of mixed or of full blood revenue tax collections of the Bureau of Internal
shall have the right to identify themselves, thei; Revenue and collections of the Bureau of
spouses and descendants, as Bangsamoro. Customs. The amount shall be sufficient for the
b. The present geographical area known as the exercise of the powers and functions of the
Autonomous Region in Muslim Mindanao Bangsamoro Government under this Org<1nic Law
and in no case shall be less than the last budget
Page 236 of 320 i
.....
:o:,J..
ATENEO CENTRAL
BAR OPERATIONS 2019 POLITICAL LAW
received by the Autonomous Region in Muslim a. Police Power (General Welfare Clause)
Mindanao immediately before the establishment of Police power is not Inherent In rr.unicipal corporations.
the Bangsamoro Autonomous Region. Under the LGC, LGUs exercise police power under the
general welfare clause; it refers to the power of regulation.
1. POWERS OF LOCAL GOVERNMENT UNITS
Requisites for valid exercise of police power
Sources of the powers of LGUs: 1. Lawful subject: public interest requires interference.
1. Constitution 2. Lawful means: means is necessary to accomplish
2. Statute the purpose and not unduly oppressive upon
3. Those applicable to all municipal corporations or to the individuals.
class to which it belongs ·
4. Special acts of the legislature General Welfare Clause - it is the statutory dP,legation of
5. Charter · police power of the state to LGUs. (Local Government
Code, sec. 16).
Four Categories of Powers Exercised by LGUs:
1. Powers expressly granted Test to Determine Validity of Exercise Police Power
2. Powers necessarily implied therefrom 1. The subject matter of the law must be lawful, which
3. Powers necessary, appropriate, or Incidental for efficient means that public interest, as distinguished from those
of a particular interest, requires the interference of the
and effective governance
State;
4. Powers essential to the promotion of the general 2. The means employed to attain the purpose of the law
welfare [Sec. 16, LGC) must be reasonably necessary;
3. It must not be unduly oppressive upon individuals.
Within their respective territorial jurisdictions, LGUs (NTC v, Philippine Veterans Bank. G.R. Nos. 84132-
shall ensure and support: 33, December 10, 1990).
(a) Preservation and enrichment of culture
Branches of the General Welfare Clause:
(b) Promotion of health and safety General legislative power - authority to enact
(c) Enhancement of the right of the people to a balanced ordinances and regulations as may be necessary to
ecology carry into effect and discharge the powers and duties
(d) Development of self-reliant scientific and technological conferred upon the municipal council by law.
capabilities Police power proper - authority lo enact ordinances
(e) Improvement of public morals as are necessary and proper to provide for the health
and safety, promote prosperity, improve morals,
(f) Enhancement of economic prosperity and social
peace, good order etc.
·,· ~ justice
(g) Promotion of full employment among residents Limitation: (DETEC)
(\
- (h) Maintenance of peace and order 1. gxpress grant by law
. . . .. "\
(i) Preservation of the comfort and convenience of its 2. Ierritoriality, meaning power is exercisable only
(
... : inhabitants [Sec. 16, LGC) within territorial limits of the local government unit,
except for protection of water supply. {Rodriguez, The
Local Government Code of 1991 Annotated, 9, 2003).
Two Branches of General Welfare Clause 3. Does not contravene the gqual protection clause
General legislative power - Authorizes municipal 4. Does not contravene Que process
t: '1
I
;.__:•
'
councils to enact ordinances and make regulations not 5. Must not be &_ontrary to law .
repugnant to law and may be necessary to carry into effect
and discharge the powers and duties conferred upon it by Tests used to detennine validity of the exercise of
Police power
law
Police power proper - Authorizes the municipality to To invoke the exercise of police power as the rationale for
enact ordinances as may be proper and necessary for the the enactment of an ordinance and to free it from the
health and safety, prosperity, morals, peace, good order, imputation of constitutional infirtnity, two tests have been
comfort and convenience of the municipality and its used:
inhabitant, and for the protection of their property (1) the rational relationship test- there must be a
[Fernando v. St. Scholaslica's College, G.R. No. 161107 concurrence of a lawful subject and lawful method.
(2013)) (2) the strict scrutiny test. Under the strict scrutiny test, the
focus is on the presence of c.ompelling, rather than
Page 237 of 320
issued by trial courts should be stricttf or for the welfare of the poor or landless.
followed. No preliminary injunction should 2. Qrdinance authorizing the local chief executive to
issue unless the evidence to support the subject a certain property to expropriation
injunctive relief is clear and convincing. 3. Paymant of Just compensation (·
(Dynamic Builders and Construction Co., Inc. 4. Valid and definite Qffer to pay which was not
v. Presbitero, G.R. 174201, 2015) accepted,
5. Exercised by the LGU through its thief executive.
A municipality is a real party-in-interest and an
indispensable party that stands to be directly affected by Jurisdiction
any judicial resolution on the case assailing the validity of An expropriation suit falls under the Jurisdiction of the r .';\
r.
the loan, considering that: (a) the contracting parties to the RTCs. The subject of an expropriation suit is the '~-'
loans are the bank and the municipality; and (b) the government's exercise of eminent domain, a matter that is
municipality owns the public plaza as well as the incapable of pecuniary estlmation. [Barangay San Roque
improvements constructed thereon, and must therefore be v. Heirs of Pastor, G.R. No. 138896 (2000)]
impleaded In the case. (Land Bank v. Cacayuran, G.R.
191667, 2015). Just Compensation
Page 238 of 320
ATENEO CENTRAL
BAR OPERATIONS 2019 POLITICAL LAW
• The determination of "just compensation" In eminent Under the Urban Development and Housing Act,
domain cases is a judicial function. Hence, a statutory expropriation by an LGU for purposes of urban land reform
provision on a fixed formula in the computation of just and housing shall occur only as a last resort. It must be
compensation in cases of acquisition of easements of shown by the LGU that other rnethods of acquisition
right of way is not binding upon the Court. [National (community mortgage, land swapping, land assembly or
Power Corp. v. lleto, G.R. No. 169957 (2012)] consolidation, land banking, donation to the Government,
joint venture agreements, and negotiated purchase) have
• Just compensation is determined as of the time of actual
been exhausted [Sec. 1 OJ I
taking [Sec. 19, LGCJ
Role of judiciary - It can Inquire into the legality of the Taxes, fees, and charges which accrue exclusively for their
exercise of the right and determine whether there was a use and disposition
genuine necessity. Just share In national taxes which shall be automatically
and directly released to them
Procedure for expropriation Equitable share in the proceeds from utilization and
NATIONAL development of national wealth and resources within their
LGUs territorial jurisdiction [Sec. 18, LGC]
GOVERNMENT
1. The filing of a 1. The filing of a LGUs may create their own sources of revenue
complaint for expropriation complaint for
sufficient in form and expropriation sufficient in All LGUs are empowered to create their own sources of
substance; and form and substance; and revenue and to levy taxes, fees, and charges subject to the
provisions on local taxation consistent with tile basic policy
2. The deposit of the 2. The making of a of local autonomy. The Sanggunian concerned through an
amount equivalent to 15% of deposit equivalent to the ordinance has the power to impose a tax, fee, or charge.
the fair market value of the assessed value of 'the ' The procedural requirements of public hearing and
property to be expropriated property subject to publication must be observed for purposes of compliance
based on its current tax expropriation. with the requirements of due process. (Local Government
declaration (lloHo v. Legaspi,
Code, Sec. 18)
G.R. 154614, 2004). See: Rules of Court, Rule
67 and Robern
See: Local Government Development Corporation Powers to generate and apply resources
Code.sec. 19 v. Quitain, G.R. 135042, 1. To establish an organization that shall be responsible
1999 for the efficient and effective implementation of their
development plans, program objectives, and
priorities.
c. Taxing Power 2. To create their own sources of revenues and to levy
taxes, fees, and charges which shall accrue
Each local government unit shall have the power to create exclusively for their use and disposition and which
its own sources of revenues and to levy taxes, tees, and shall be retained by tnem. .
charges subject to such guidelines and limitatlons as the 3. To have a just share in national taxes which shall be
Congress may provide, consistent with the basic policy of automatically and directly released to them without
local autonomy. Such taxes, fees, and charges shall need for any further action.
accrue exclusively to the local governments. (1987 4. To have an equitable share in the proceeds from the
Constitution, Art. X, Sec. 5) utilization and development of the national wealth and
resources within their respective territorial
jurisdictions including sharing the same with the
Principles of Taxation inhabitants by way of direct benefits.
Taxation shall be uniform: 5. To acquire, develop, lease, encumber, alienate, or
Taxes, fees, and charges:
(a) Shall be eauitable and based as far as
otherwise dispose of real or personal property held by
them in their proprietary capacity and to apply their
.
.._ .:
resources and assets for productive, developmental,
practicable on the taxpayer's ability to pay;
or welfare purposes, in the exercise or furtherance of
(b) Shall be levied and collected only for a public their governmental or proprietary powers and
purpose; · functions and thereby ensure their development into
(c) Shall not be unjust, excessive, oppressive, or self-reliant communities and active participants in the
confiscatory; and attainment of national goals.
(d) Shall not be contra;y to law, public policy,
national economic policy, or in restraint of trade; r
.' ._
"'-
....... ..:
Collection shall in no case be left to any private person;
Revenue shall inure solely to the benefit of the levying
~.. ;·
LGU, unless otherwise specified; and
Each LGU shall, as far as practicable, evolve a progressive
system of taxation [Sec. 130, LGC]
,.
\ ,•
Sources of LGU Funds
Page 240 of 320
·---------------..··- .. ---
ATENEO CENTRAL
BAR OPERATIONS2019 POLITICAL LAW
~ ....
------------------. -
ATENEO CENTRAL
BAR OPERATIONS 2019 POLITICAL LAW
that the exemption shall not apply if the sand and g'ravel Government Code should be read as granting fiscal
were to be disposed of commercially. An exemption from flexibility to local government units. (Demaa/a v. COA, G.R.
the requirements of the provincial government should have -, 199752, 2015).
a clear basis, whether In law, ordinance, or even from the
contract itself. (Lepanto Consolidated Mining Company v. By operation of Sec. 151 of the LGC extending to cities the
Ambanloc, G.R. 180639, 2010). authority of provinces and municipalities to levy certain
taxes, fees, and charges, cities may therefore validly levy
Nature of L.GUs power to tax amusement taxes on cinemas subject to the parameters
set forth under the law. (Film Development Council of the
LGUs have no inherent power to tax except to the extent
Philippines v. City of Cebu et al, G.R. 204418, 2015). ·
that such power might be delegated to them either by the
basic law or by the statute. Under the 1987 Constitution,
where there is neither a grant nor a prohibition by statute, LGUs shall accrue exclusively to the LGU and to
the tax power must be deemed to exist althouqh Congress eannark
may provide statutory l!mitations and guideline'>. The basic Taxes levied by LGUs shall accrue exclusively to the LGU
rationale for the current rule is to safeguard the viaoility and and to earmark, If not altoqether confiscate, the income to
self-sufficiency · of local government units by directly be received by the LGU from the taxpayers in favor of and
granting them general and broad tax powers. for transmlttal to the Fiim Development Council of the
Nevertheless, the fundamental law did not intend the Philippines, is repugnant to the power of LGUs to apportion
delegation to be absolute and unconditional; the their resources in line with their priorities (Film
constitutional objective obviously is to ensure that, while Development Council of the Philippines v, City of Cebu et
the local government units are being strengthened and al, G.R. 204418, 2015).
made more autonomous, the legislature must still see to it
that (a) the taxpayer will not be over-burdened or saddled An injunction case before the RTC is a local tax case. A
· with multiple and unreasonable impositions; (b) each local certicrari petition questioning an interlocutory order issued
government unit will have its fair share of available in a local tax case falls under the jurisdiction of the CTA.
resources; (c) the resources of the national government ( CE Casecnan Water and Energy Company, Inc. v. The
will not be unduly disturbed; and (d) local taxation will be Province of Nueva Ecija, G.R. 196278, 2015).
fair, uniform. and just. (Ferrer v. Bautista, G.R. 210551,
2015). Mayor has the ministerial duty to ensure that all taxes
and other revenues of the city are collected
To pass judicial scrutiny, a regulatory fee must not produce
The mayor has the ministerial duty to ensure that all taxes
revenue in excess of the cost 1,f the regulation because
and other revenues of the city are collected, and that city
such fee will be construed as an illegal tax when the
funds are applied to the pay,nent of expenses and
revenue generated by the regulation exceeds the cost of
settlement of obligations of the city, in accordance with law
· the regulation. (Ferrer v. Bautista, G.R. 210551, 2015).
or ordinance. On the other hand, under the LGC, all local
taxes, fees, and charges shall be collected by the
While local govemmer.t units are authorized to burden all
'provincial, city, municipal, or ba'rangay treasurer, or their
such other class of goods with "taxes, fees and charges,"
duly-authorized deputies, while the assessor shall take
excepting excise taxes. a specific prohibition is imposed
charge, among others, of ensuring that all laws and
barring the levying of any other type of taxes with respect
policies governing the appraisal and assessment of real
to petroleum products. (Petron Corporation v. Tiangco,
properties for taxation purposes are properly executed. ·.. ;;.
G.R. 158881, 2008; Batangas Cny v. Piliplnas Shell
Thus, a writ of prohibition may be issued against them to
Petroleum Corp., G.R. 187631, 2015)
desist from further proceeding in the aciion or matter
specified in the petition. (Ferrer v. Bautista, G.R. 210551,
Setting the rate of the additional levy for the special
2015).
education fund at less than 1% is within the taxing power
of local government units. It is consistent with the guiding
The socialized housing tax charged by the city is a tax
constitutional principle of local autonomy. The option given
which is within its power to impose. Aside from the specific
lo a local goverrnnent unit extends not only to the matter of
authority vested by Section 43 of the UDHA, cities are
whether to collect but also to the rate at which collection Is
allowed to exercise such other powers and discharge such
to be made. The limits on the level of additional levy for the
other functions and responsibilities as are necessary,
special education fund under Section 235 of the Local
approprlate, or incidental to efficient and effective provislon
Page 242 of 320 ·..:,
·----------·· ... -
.'•. ,·· ..
ATENEO CENTRAL
BAR OPERATIONS 2019 POLITICAL LAW
of the basic services and facilities which include, among a. Real property owned by the Republic of the
others, programs and projects for low-cost housing and Philippines or any of its political subdivisions
other mass dwellings. The collections made accrue to Its EXCEPT when the beneficial use thereof has
socialized housing programs and projects. The tax is not a been granted, for consideration or otherwise, to
pure exercise of t3xing power or merely to raise revenue: a taxable person;
it is levied with a regulatory purpose. The levy is primarily a. Cha.ltable institutions, churches, parsonages or
in the exercise of the police power for the general welfare convents appurtenant thereto, mosques, nonprofit
of the entire city. It is greatly imbued with public interest. or religious cemeteries and all lands, buildings, and
(Ferrerv. Bautista. G.R. N210551, 2015). improvements actually, directly, and exclusively
used for religious, charitable or educational
Withdrawal of Local Tax Exemption Privileges purposes;
Unless otherwise provided in the LGC, tax exemptions or b. All machineries and equipment that are actually,
incentives granted to, or enjoyed by all persons, wheiher directly and exclusively used by local water districts
natural or juridical, including government-owned or - and government- owned or -controlled corporations
controlled corporations were withdrawn upon the effectivity engaged in the supply and distribution of water and/or
of the LGC. [Sec. 193, LGC] generation and transmission of electric power;
c. All real property owned by duly registered cooperatives
Privileges Retained: Tax exemption privileges of the as provided for under R.A. No . .3988; and
following were not withdrawn by the LGC: d. Machinery and equipment used for pollution control
1. Local water districts; and environmental prctectlon [Sec. 234, LGCJ
2. Cooperatives duly registered under R.A. No. 6938; and
3. Non-stock and non-profit hospitals and educational Other limitations on taxing powers of LGUs
institutions [Sec. 193, LGC; Sec. 234, LGC] Taxes already Imposed by National Government:
Generally, LGUs cannot impose taxes that are already
Regulation of Activity and Tax imposed by the National Government (e.g. income tax,
The garbage fee is a charge fixed for the regulation of an documentary stamps, estate taxes, customs duties, excise
activity. It is not a tax and cannot violate the rule on double taxes under the NIRC, VAT) (See generally, Sec. 133,
taxation. (Ferrer v. Bautista, G.R. 210551, 2015). LGC]
Person!'i exempted: LGUs cannot impose taxes, fees,
Mactan Cebu International Airport Authority is an and charges on (a) countryside and barangay business
instrumentality of the government, not a GOCC; thus, its enterprises: (b) cooperatives duly registered under the
properties actually, solely and exclusively used for public Cooperative Code; and National Government, its agencies
purposes, consisting of the airport terminal building, and instrumentalities, and local government units. [Sec.
airfield, runway, taxiway and the lots on which they are 133(n)-(o), LGC]
<:>
situated, are not subject to real property tax and the city is • An inrstrumentality of the State or National
, .• not justified in collecting taxes from petitioner over said Government is exempt from local taxation.
properties. (Mactan Cebu fnternationaf Airport v. City of [Sec. 133(0), LGCJ Hence, the Manila
'
Lapu-Lapu, G.R. No. 181756, 2015). International Airport Authority, being such an
instrumentality and not being an GOCC, is
Real Property Taxation exempt from local taxation. [MIM v. CA, G.R.
( '\
.. ,:; Annual ad valorem tax on real property may be levied by No. 155650 (2006)]
a: • However, GOCCs are [generally] not exempt
(1) Province; or from local taxation. [MIAA v. CA (2006)]
(2) City; or
(3) Municipality within Metropolitan Manila Area [Sec. 232, RECLASSIFICATION OF LANDS
LGC]
Requisites for Reclassification
Exemptions from Real Property Tax yia ordinance;
The following are exempted from payment of the real After public hearings for the purpose
property tax: Limited to the following percentages:
, '
?.
Page 243 of 320
ATENEO CENTRAL
BAR OPERATIONS 2019 POLITICAL LAW
15% for highly urbanized and independent component CLOSURE AND OPENING OF ROADS
cities
10% for component cities and 1st to 3rd class A LGU may, pursuant to an ordinance, permanently or
municipalities · temporarily close or open any local road, alley, park, or
5% for 4th to '3th class municipalities square fam.,g within its Jurisdiction.
{ .
Page 244 of 320 ' .
',.;..,•
. ,..,_ -·- ..
A TENEO CENTRAL
BAR OPERATIONS 2019 POLITICAL LAW
The passage of an ordinance by a local government unit to If a freedom park is permanently closed, there must be a
effect the opening of a local road, can have no applicability provision for its transfer or relocation to a new site. [Sec.
to the if the subdivision road lots sought to be opened to 21(a),{b)]
decongest traffic in the area have already been donated to, ·
and the titles thereto alreaoy issued in the name of tne City Such property permanently withdrawn from public use may
Government. Having been already donated or turned over be used or conveyed for any purpose for which other real
to the City Government, the road lots in question have property belonging to the LGU may be lawfully used or
since then taken the nature of public roads which are conveyed. [Sec. 21{b}]
withdrawn from the commerce of man. (New Sun Valley v.
Sangguniang Barangay, G.R. 156636, 2011). D. LEGISLATIVE POWER
Road, alley, park or square is (d) Requisites of a valid ordinance (CUP PUG)
1. Must not ~ontravene the Constitution or any
National Local statute
' 2. Must not be .Ynfair or oppressive
Temporary closuro 1. Temporary 3. Must not be fartlal or discriminatory
only. 2. Permanent closure i.·. Must not frohibit, but may regulate trade
5. Must not be ,!.lnreasonable
Scope of LGIJ's power to close 6. Must be ~eneral and consistent with public policy
Via ordinance approved by at least 213 of all members of Barangay because he is already a member of the
the Sanggunian; Sangguniang Barangay.
When necessary, an adequate substitute for the public
,.•..::,,.;,·, The Liga ng mga Barangay cannot exercise legislative
. facility that is subject to closure should be provided;
Such ordinance must have provisions for the maintenance powers because it is not a local government unit and its
of public safety therein; and primary purpose is to determine representation of the liga
in the sanggunians to ventilate, articulate and crystallize
·.. ;.;
•: I
issues affecting barangay government administration, and
f._,_;
Page 245 of 320
ATENEO CENTRAL
BAR OPERATIONS 20·19 POLITICAL LAW
to secure solutions for them through proper and legal The higher council can declare the ordinance or resolution
means. (Onon v. Fernandez, G.R. No.139813, 2001). invalid if it is beyond tho scope of the power conferred upon
the lower Sanggunian. For barangay ordinances, the
Grounds for the veto power of the Local Chief higher council can also rule that it is inconsistent with law ·
Executive or city/municipal ordinances.
1. Ultra vires
2. Prejudicial to public welfare Presiding officer
Third reading is required Third reading not required Procedure for local initiative:
1. Number of voters who should file petition with c·:......
Usually used in the Usually used in the LGU's Sanggunian concerned:
exercise of the LGU's exercise of proprietary ·a. Provinces and cities - at least 1000 registered
governmental functions functions voters
b. Municipality - at least 100 registered voters
Only some may be subject c. Barangay - at least 50 registered voters
Subject to veto
to veto and review 2. Sanggunian concerned has 30 days to act on the
petition. If the Sanggunian does not take any favorable 'x.;
by the LGU to private persons, (Macasiano v. Diokno, G.R. concerned for adjustment, amendment or modification; in
97764, 1992). which case the effectivity of the barangay ordinance is
suspended until such time as the revision called for is
Pursuant to tha regalian doctrine, any land that has never effected.
been acquired through purchase, grant or any other mode
of acquisition remains part of the public domain and is 2.LIABILITY OF LOCAL GOVERNMENT UNITS
owned by the State. LGUs cannot appropriate to
themselves public lands without prior grant from the Municipal Liability
government. (Rural Bank of Anda v. Roman Catholic LGUs and their officials are not exempt from liability for
Archbishop of Lingayen·Dagupan, G.R. 155051, 2007). death or injury to persons or damage to property.
If the Sangguniang Panlungsod or Sangguniang Bayan, as The government is justified to decline payment of the
the case may be, finds the barangay ordinances purchase price of illegally cut lumber delivered by a
inconsistent with law or city or municipal ordinances, the contractor who won a public bidding for the construction of
Sanggunian concerned shall within 30 days from the the Navotas Bridge. All contracts, including government
receipt thereof, return the same with its comments and contracts, are subject to the police power of the '•·.:..·
recommendations to the Sangguniang Barangay State. Being an inherent attribute of sovereignty, such
Page 248 of 320
power is deemed incorporated into the laws of the land, corporate name, they may sue, be sued, contract and be
which are part of all contracts, thereby qualifying the contracted with. (Torio v. Fontanilla , G.R. L-29993, 1978).
obligations arising therefrom. Thus, it is an implied
condition in the subject contract for the procurement of A mayor cannot be held personally liable if his actions were
materials needed in the repair and construction of the dcne pursuant to an ordinance which, at the time of the
Navotas Bridge that petitioner as private contractor would collection, was yet to be invalidated. (Demaala v. COA,
comply with pertinent forestry laws and regulations on the G.R. 199752, 2015).
cutting and gathering of the lumber she undertook to
supply the provincial government (Guadines v. The writ was directed at' the mayor not in his personal
Sandiganbayan, G.R. 164891, 2011). capacity, but in his capacity as municipal mayor, so that it
is not irregular whether it was served upon him during his
Liability v. Defense earlier term or In his subsequent one. (Vargas v. Cajucom,
LIABILITY DEFENSE G.R. 171095,2015)
LGUs and IQCal officials &re LGUs generally can 3.SETTLEMENT ..Qf BOUNDARY DISPUTES
liable in case of: be sued based on
Death their "charters/laws- Situation v. Where to Settle
Injury, or power to sue and be
SITUATION WHERE TO SETTLE
Damage to property (Local sued"
Government Code, sec. 24)
Boundary disputes Involving 2 The sangguniang
Generally lirnltcd to
or more barangays in the same panlungsod or
The State is responsible in like proprietary functions.
city or municipality. Sangguniang bayan
manner when it acts through a
concerned.
special agent; but not when the
damage has been caused by the Boundary disputes Involving 2 The Sangguniang
official to whom the task done or more municipalities within panlalawigan
properly pertains. (Civil Coda, the same province concerned
art.2180)_
Boundary disputes involving Jointly referred for
State/LGUs liable fur death or municipalities or component settlement to the
injuries suffered by reason of cities of different provinces Sanggunians of the
defective roads, bridges or other province concerned
public works under their
supervision Provlnces, cities and Boundary disputes Involving a Jointly referred for
r • municipalities shall be liable for component city or municipality settlement to the
=.. •; damages for the death of, or on the one hand and a highly respective
injuries suffered by any person urbanized city on the other, or Sanggunians of the
(~ two (2) or more hlghly parties
~••. ,iJ by reason of the defective
condition of roads, streets, urbanized cities.
bridges, public buildings, and
.. '!
other public works under their '
,.
control or supervision. (Civil According to Section 118 of the Local Government Code,
1::..:-~
Code, art. 2189)
bour.aary disputes between and among municipalities
should be referred for settlement to the sangguniang
Special aget;tt - One who receives a definite and fixed panlalawiqan and not with the Regional Trial Court.
order or commission, foreign to the exercise of the duties (Municipality of Sta. Fe v. Municpality of Artao, G.R. No.
of his office, so that in representation of the state and being 140474, 2007)
bound to act as agent thereof, he executes the trust
confided to him. However, there is no law providing for the jurisdiction of
. any court or quasi-judicial body over the settlement of a
In tile case where a stage collapsed during a zarzuela, boundary dispute between a municipality and an
municipal corporations will be liable for the injury sustained independent component city, thus, the Re,gional Trial Court
by the victims. Under Philippine law, municipalities are has jurisdiction to adjudicate it. Under Section 19 (6) of the
political bodies corporate. They are endowed with the Judiciary Reorganization Act, the RTC has exclusive
faculties of municipal corporations. In their proper original jurisdiction in all cases not within the exclusive
Page 249 of 320
ATENEO CENTRAL
BAR OPERATIONS 2019 POLITICAL LAW
Permanent Vacancy
Qualifications: (FR-LAV)
1. f ilipino citizen
Grounds for Permanent Vacancy: (F2VR2-DP)
2. Registered ~oter in the:
a. barangay, municipality, city or province where he 1. Elective local official fills a higher vacant office
intends to be elected ·
2. Refuses to assume office
b. district where he intends to be elected in case of a
3. fails to qualify
4 . .Qi~s
member of the Sangguniang P,mlalawigan, •, I,'
5. Bemoved from office
Sangguniang Panlungsod or Sangguniang bayan
6. ~oluntarily resigns
3. Besident therein for at least 1 year immediately
7. fermanently Incapacitated to discharge the functions
preceding the day of the election
of his office
4. Able to read and write Filipino or any other local
,banguage or dialect
Filling of Vacancy:
5. Age requirement
• Automatic succession
• Appointment
Age Requirement
General Rule: the successor (by appointment) should
AGE come from the same political party as the Sanggunian
POSITION
REQUIREMENT member whose position has beccme vacant.
Exception: case of vacancy in the Sangguniang barangay
Governor, Vice Governor, Mayor,
(Local Government Code, sec. 45).
Vice Mayor, member of At least 23 years
SangguniangPanlungsod in old on election day
highl~, urbanized cities Ranking - Determined on the basis or proportion of votes
obtained by each winning candidate to the total number of
Mayor, Vice Mayor of registered voters in each district in the immediately
At least 21 years
independent component cities or preceding local election.
old
municipalities
Temporary Vacancy
(i) Elective officials
Non-exclusive grounds for temporary vacancy
1. Leave of absence i. Grounds (MA3C 020):
2. Travel abroad 1. Commission of any offense involving Moral
3. Suspension from office turpitude or an offense punishable by al least
prison mayor
General Rule: If the position of governor, mayor, or 2. ~pplication or acquisition of foreign citizenship
punong barangay becomes temporarily vacant, the vice- or residence or the status of an immigrant of
governor, vice-mayor or highest-ranking Sanggunian another country
member will automatically exercise the powers and 3. Abuse of authority
perform· the duties and functions of the local chief 4. Unauthorized Absence for 15 consecutive
executive concerned. working days, ~cept in the case of members
Exception: HE: cannot exercise the power to appoint, of the Sanggunian Panlalawigan,
suspend or dismiss employees. Sangguniang Panlungsod, Sanggunlang
Exception to the Exception: If the period of temporary Bayan, Sangguniang Barangay.
incapacity exceeds 30 working days. (Local Government 5. Culpable Vloletlon of the ~onstitution
Code, sec. 46). 6. Qisloyalty to the Republic of the Philippines
7. Qishonesty, oppression, misconduct in office,
Termination of Temporary Incapacity gross negligence, dereliction of duty
1. Upon submission to the appropriate Sanggunian of a 8. Qther ground.1. as may be provided by the
written declaration by the local chief that he has
Code or other laws.
reported back to office.
2. ltthe temporary incapacity was due to legal reason, the If the incident complained of occurred in another barangay
local chief executive should also submit necessary over which a barangay official has no authority and
documents showing that the legal causes no longer jurisdiction, the Supreme Court ruled that he is liable for
exist (Local Government Code, sec. 46). abuse of authority on the basis that he participated in the
unlawful act as a higher authority that gave a semblance
Appointment of OIC
of legality over that act and influenced the actions of his co-
The local chief executive can designate in writing an OIC if
defendants. Here, petitioner was president of the
he is traveling within the country but outside his territorial
organization of baraaqay officials i11 his municipality and
. jurisdiction for a period not exceeding 3 consecutive days.
sat as ex-officio member of the Sangguniang Bayan, which
The OIC cannot exercise the power to appoint, suspend or
has power to review barangay ordinances and authority to
dismiss employees (Local Government Code, sec. 46).
discipline barangay officials. (Bien v. Bo, G.R. 179333,
2010)
('\ VACANCY SUCCESSOR
·-,
II Jurisdiction
Governor, Mayor Vice-Governor, Vice-Mayor
\ .- ELECTIVE APPOINTED
Governor, Vice-governor, Highest ranking
.. ~ Mayor or Vice-mayor Sanggunlan member President -
.. 4" .. .,
Elective official
.' •. Highest ranking of a province,
': !i Sanggunian member
Second highest ranking highly
(who was supposed to fill urbanized or
Sanggunian member The local chief
the vacant position of Independent
governor, etc.) executive to sny
Who may component
subordinate official
preventively city.
Highest ranking or employee under
suspend
Sangguniang Barangay his authority pending
In the office of the Governor-·
member OR the 2nd investigation.
Punong Barangay Elective official
highest ranking
ofa
Sanggunlan member
component city
';. J
. DISCIPLINE OF LOCAL OFFICIALS
or municipality.
Ma yor-
El ective official Sa ngguniang
of a barangay. Pa nlalawigan -
'
el ective
A ny :.ingle m unicipal
preventive 0 fficials.
suspension
shall not Penalty of
extend beyond suspension -
60 days; if shall not
multiple, exceed his
Duration of Except as otherwise
cannot be A period not · unexpired
preventive provided by law, t.he
suspended for exceeding 60 days. term, or a
suspension local chief executive
more than 90 period of 6
may impose the
days within a months for
penalty of:
single year for every
tne same admlnlstrafive
ground or
1. Removal from
offense. Nor
service
grounds shall said
existing. penalty be a
- Disciplinary
2. Demotion in
bar to the
Any of the rank
jurisdiction candidacy of
grounds (disciplinary the respondent
provided under cases)
3. Suspension -
as long as he
RA 7160, after for not more
Charges for is qualified.
the issues are than 1 year
preventive without pay
joined, when Removal - can
suspension must
the evidence of only be done
involve dishonesty, 4. Fine- in an
guilt is strong by a court of
oppression or grave amount not
and there is law; the
misconduct or exceeding 6
great penalty of ·
When to neglect in the months salary
probability that removal from
preventively performance of duty,
the office shall be
suspend or if there is reason . 5. Reprimand
continuance in a bar to the
to believe that the
office could candidacy from
respondent is guilty
influence the ' any elective
of the charges which
witnesses or office.
would warrant his
pose a threat
removal from
to the safety Decisions may,
service.
and Integrity of within 30 days
If the penalty
the records from receipt be
Imposed is •... :r
and other appealable to:
suspension without
evidence.
pay for not mor~
Sangguniang
Administrative than 30 days, his
Panlalawigan -
Govomed by Discipline Governed decision shall be
Governing law decisions of
RA 7160. by the Civil Service final· if the penalty
Appeals component
Law. imp~sed is heavier,
(disciplinary cities'
the decision shall be
cases) S.Panglunsod
A verified appealable to the
and the
complaint to: Civil servtce
s.Bayan
F resident-for Commission which
Where to file provincial, shall decide the
( disciplinary The local chief OP-decisions
highly appeal within 30
cases) executive. of the
urbanized city, days from receipt
Sangguniang
independent thereof.
Panlalawigan
componentc ity
and
elective officl al.
a ~ 252 of320
pg:
ATENEO CENTRAL
BAR OPERATIONS 2019 POLITICAL LAW
The doctrine of condonatlon has been dispensed with Punong barangay and
by the Court. Election is not a mode of condoning an City Sangguniang barangay members
administrative offense, and there is simply no constitutional in the city
or statutory basis in our jurisdiction to support the notion Electi·.ie municipal/ barangay ·~. -r
that an official elected for a different term rs fully absolved Legislative district
officials
of any administrative liability arising from an offense done
during a prior term. However, the doctrine of condonation Punong barangay and
should be, as a general rule, recognized as good law prior Municipal Sangguniang barangay members i -,
'I.,:: .. '
to its abandonment. ( Carpio-Morales v. CA and Binay, in the municipality
G.R. 217126-27, 2015).
·----------------···- -----
A TENEO CENTRAL
BAR OPERATIONS2019 POLITICAL LAW
• The written petition for recall should be duly signed For the 3-term rule to apply, the local offlcial must
before the election registrar or his represe:ntative and have:
in the presence of the representative of the petitioner 1. fully served the term
and the official sought to be recalled. 2. been elected through a regular election
• It should be signed in e public place.
• Petition should be filed with COMELEC through its The following are not considered as interruptions in
office in the LGU concerned term:
• Publication of petition for 10-20 days in order to verify 1. Voluntary renunciation of a term.
the authenticity and genuineness of the petition and A councilor assuming the office of vice-mayor through
the required percer.tage of voters (Local Government succession is not considered a voluntary renunciation of
Code, sec. 70). his position as councilor. It is clear therefore that voluntary
renunciation of a term does not cancel the renounced term
Conduct of Recall Election: in the computation of the three term limit; conversely,
1. The official sought to be recalled are
involuntary severance from office for any length of time
AUTOMATICALLY considered as duly registered -, short of the full term provided by law amounts to an
candidates. interruption of continuity of service (Montebon v.
2. The date set for the recall election should not be less COIV,ELEC, G.R. 180444, 2008).
than 30 days after filing of resolution/ petition in the
case of barangay, city or municipal officials and 45
The relinquishment of the office of Punong Barangay
days in the case of provincial officials {Local
. during the third term, as a consequence of one's
Government Code, sec. 71).
assumption to office as Sangguniang Bayan, is a voluntary
renunciation (Bolos v. COMELEC, G.R. 184082, 2009).
Effectivity of Recall
1. Recall will only be effective upon the election and
( 2. Sandiganbayan preventively suspended the
_,:, proclamation of a successor.
officer for 90 days in relation with a criminal case
2. If the official sought to be recalled receives the highest (Aldovino Jr. v. COMELEC, G.R. 184836, 2009).
number of votes, confidence in him is affirmed and he
shall continue in office (Local Government Code, sec. 3. Munic\pality merged with another municipality to
72). form a new political unit iLeced«, Sr. v. Limena, G.R.
182867, 2008).
Limits on Recall
• Elective local official can be the subject of a recall When a permanent vacancy occurs in an elective position
election only once during his term of office. and an official assumed office under the rules on
• No recall shall take place within 1 year from the date succession under the LGC, his assumption to said office
of the official's assumption to office or 1 year shall not be considered as one full term (Borja Jr. v.
immediately preceding a regular local election (Local COMELEC)
GovernmentCode, sec. 74).
r ~·'
l
'I: ••
..
I
':.,,._.,
'
,
.,'- .;'
".,.
~-.)
t ..
...
\ ;
XII. NATIONAL ECONOMY AND PATRIMONY Three-Fold Goal of the National Economy
1. More equitable distribution of opportunities, income
TOPIC OUTLINE UNDER THE SYLLABUS and wealth;
2. Increase of wealth for the benefit of the people, and
A. Regalian Doctrine 3. Increased productivity (CONST, Art.XII, Sec.1)
B. Nationalist and Citizenship Requirement
REGALIAN DOCTRINE
provisions
C. Exploration, Development, and Utilization of IMPERIUM DOMINIUM
Natural Resources
D. Franchises, Authority, and Certificates for Public Government authority The capacity of the State
possessed by the State to own and acquire
Utilities
which is appropriately property.
E. Acquisition, Ownership and Transfer of Public and
embraced in sovereignty. It refers to lands held by
Private Lands
the govtlrnment in a
F. Practice of Professions proprietary character.
G. Organization and Regulation of Corporations,
Private and Public
What is the Regalian doctrine? (Jura Regalia)
H. Monopc.lies, Restraint of Trade, and Unfair
Universal feudal theory that all lands were held from the
Competition
Crown. All lands not otherwise clearly appearing to be
privately owned are presumed to belong to the State.
(Carino v. Insular Government. GR No. 72, February 23,
1909)
;
... ,,,
General Rule: All natural resources cannot be
(.
v,....·"'
alienated.
Native Title
refers to pre-conquest rights to lands and domains which,
as far back as memory reaches, have been held under a
claim of private ownership by indigenous cultural
communities and indigenous people, have never been
public lands and are thus indisputably presumed to have
been held that way since before the Spanish conquest.
(IPRA, sec. 3(/)).
scientific and technological research in the field of NATIONALIST ANO CITIZENSHIP REQUIREMENT
agriculture. They have ceased to be alienable public lands. PROVISIONS
Besides, when Congress enacted the IPRA or RA 8371 in
1997, it provided in Section 56 that "property rights within Rule on Private Lands
the ancestral domains already existing and/or vested" General Rulo: Private lands CAN only be conveyed to:
upon its effectivity "shail be recognized and respected." In 1. Filipino citizens .
this case, ownership over the subject lands had been 2. Corporations or associatlons incorporated in the
vested in CMU as early as 1958. Consequently, Philippines, at least 60% of whose capital is owned by
transferring the lands in 2003 to the indigenous peoples Filipino citizens (1987 Constitution, art. XII, sec. 7).
around the area is not In accord with the IPRA. (CMU v.
Executive Secretary, G'.R. 184869, 2010). Exceptions:
In intestate succession, where an alien heir of a Filipino is
Limitations on the cf is position of the State of alienable the transferee of private land. (1987 Constitution, art. XII,
lands of the public domain sec. 7).
1. Only agricultural lands of the public domain may be A natural-born citizen of the Philippines who has lost his
alienated; Phiiippine citizenship may be a transferee of private land,
2. Only Filipino citizens may acquire lands not more than subject to limitation provided by law." Hence, land cen be
12 hectares by purchase, homestead or grant or lease used only for residential purposes. In this case, _he only
no more than 500 hectares. Private corporations may acquires derivative title. (1987 Constitution, art. XII, sec.
lease not more than 1,000 hectares for 25 years 8). However, a former natural born Filipino citizen who
renewable for another 25 years. (CONST. Art.XII, became a citizen of other countries may acquire land for
Sec.3) business and other purposes. (R.A. No. 8179, Sec. 5)
3. The exploration, development and utilization (EDU) of Foreign states may acquire land but only for embassy and
all natural resources shall be under the full control and staff residence purposes.
supervision of the State either by directly unde!'l::tking
such EDU or through co-production. joint venture, or When Filipino citizenship Required
production sharing agreements with qualified persons ... Filipino citizenship is only required at the time the land is
4. The use and enjoyment of the marine wealth of the acquired. Thus, loss of citizenship after acquiring the
archipelagic waters, territorial sea, and the EEZ shall land does not deprive: ownership.
be reserved for Filipino citizens
5. Utilization of natural resources in rivers, lakes, bays Scope of Restrir.tlon
and lagoons may be allowed only on a 'small scale' to Restriction against aliens only applies to acquisition of
Filipino citizens or cooperatives- with priority for ownership. Therefore:
subsistence fishermen and fish workers. (CONST. 1. Aliens may be lessees or· usufructuaries of private
Art.XII, Sec. 2) lands
2. Aliens may be mortgagees of land, as long as they do
not obtain possession thereof and do not bid in the
Exception with respect to rule on EDU foreclosure sale.
For large-scale EDU of minerals, petroleum and other 3. Land tenure is not indispensable to the free exercise of
mineral oils, the President may enter into agreements with religious profession and worship. A .religious
foreign-owned corporations involving technical or financial corporation controlled by non-Filipinos cannot acquire
assistance. and own land, even for religious purposes.
5. Management and service contracts are not allowed in this case through the DENR, to ensure that the terms
under this rule. and conditions of existing laws, rules and regulations,
and the IFMA itself are strictly and faithfully complied
Under the 1987 Constitution, the Philippine Government with. (Ropub/ic v. Pagadlan City·Timber, G.R. 159308,
may still enter into service contracts, but only for financial 2008).
and technical agreements with respect to large scale
development of minerals, petroleum, and other mineral FRANCHISES, AUTHORITY AND CERTIFICATES OF
resources. PUBLIC UTILITIES
A foreign corporation may enter into financial and technical Public Utility - The undertaking must involve dealing
assistance ar:;reement with the government involving the directly with the public.
management and operation of a mining enterprise. Section
2, Article XII of the Constitution allows other forms of
Primary Franchise Secondary Franchise
assistance or activities having to do with technical or
financial assistance and it will not prohibit the involvement Invests a body of men I The privilege to operate as
of foreign corporations in the management of mining with corporate existence a public utility after the
ventures. The policy recogn!zes that foreign corporations corporation has already
who will invest in mining will require that they be given a come into being
say in the management to ensure its success. The
Constitutional Commission understood technical or
The Constitution does not prohibit the mere formation of a
financial agreements as interchangeable with service
public utility corporation without the required formation of
contracts. (La Bugat-B'faan Tribal Association, Inc. v.
Filipino capital. What it does prohibit is the granting of a
Ramos, G.R. 127882, 2004, affirmed in a MR in 2005).
franchise or other form of authorization for the operation of
Also, the grant of such service contracts must be subject
a public utility to a corporation already in existence but
without the requisite proportion of Filipino capital (People
to the following safeguards: ·
of the Philippines v. Quasha, G.R. L-6055, 1953}.
1. it must be in accordance with a general law
., 2. the President must be the signatory for the government
·!_- 3. the President must report the executed agreement to Operation Ownership
Congress within 30 days. (La Bugal B'laan v. Ramos, of a Public Utility of Public Utility
G.R. No. 127882, 2004, affirmed in a MR in 2005).
May exist independently Relation in law by virtue of
Protection of Marine Wealth and separately from the which a thing pertaining to
1. The State shall protect its marine wealth in its ownership of the one person is completely
·........ .;' archipelagic waters, territorial sea and EEZ. facilities. subjected to his will in
2. The State shall reserve its use and enjoyment everything not prohibited by
exclusively to Filipino citizens. · One can own said law or the concurrence with
3. License Agreement - "a privilege granted by the State facilities without the rights of another.
to a person to utilize forest resources within any forest · operating them as a
land with the right of possession and occupation public utility, or The exercise of the rights
thereof to .the exclusion of others, except the conversely, one may encompassed in ownership
government, but with the corresponding obligation to operate a public utility is limited b, law so that a
develop, protect and rehabilitate the same in without owning the property cannot be operated
accordance wilh the terms and conditions set forth in facilities used to serve and used to serve the public
said agreement" (PD 705, sec. 3}. the public. as a public utility unless the
4. Private rights must yield when they come in conflict operator has a franchise.
with this public policy and common interest. They must
give way to the police or regulatory power of the State,
Page 261 of 320
ATENEO CENTRAL
BAR OPERATIONS 2019
POLITICAL LAW
A Build-Operate-Transfer grantee is NOT a public 1..itility. authority that it granted, it cannot do so for an
The grantee merely constructs the utility, and it leases the accumulated period exceeding 50 years. Otherwise, it
same to the government. It is the government which ,. would violate ihe proscription under Article Xii, Section 11
operates the public utility (operation separate from of the 1987 Constitution, which provides that no public
ownership). utility franchise shall be for a longer period than 50 years.
(Francisco v. Toll Regulatory Board, G.R. 166910, 2010).
To Whom Granted:
Filipino citizens or While the Republic of the Philippines appointed petitioner
Corporations or associations incorporated in the as the exclusive party to conduct petroleum operations in
Philippines and at least 60% of the capital is owned by . the Camago-Malampaya area under the State's full control
Filipino citizens and supervision, it does not follow that petitioner has
become the State's "aqent" within the meanir,g of the law.
A foreigner or foreign company may own assets of a public · An agent's ultimate undertaking is to execute juridical acts
utility corporation. What is not allowed is the grant of the that would create, modify or extinguish relations between
franchise to non-citizens of the Philippines. his principal and third persons. It is this power to affect the
principal's contractual relations with third persons that
Rule on Public Utilitle;; differentiates the agent from a service contractor. (Shell
Refers to a utility corporation which renders service to the Philippines Exploration 8. V. v. Efren Jatos, et al., G.R.
general public for compensation 179918, 2010).
Franchise, cartlficate or any other form of authorization for
the operation of :1 public utility may be issued or granted PJIGCOR is no longer exempt from corporate income tax.
only to Filipino citizens or entities with 60% capital owned Under Section 11, Article XII of the Constitution,
by such citizens. Thus, foreign corporations and foreigners PAGCOR's franchise is subject to amendment, alteration
MAY own the facilities. (Tatad v. Garcia, GR No 114222, or repeal by Congress. A franchise partakes the nature of
April 6, 1995) a grant, which is beyond the purview of the non-impairment
Terms and Conditions: clause of the Constitution. Also, Article XII, Section 11, of
Duration: not more than 50 years. the 1987 Constitution, is explicit that no franchise for the
Franchise is NOT exclusive in character. operation of a public utility shall be granted except under
Franchise is granted under the condition that it is subject the condition that such privilege shall be subject to
to amendment, alteration, or repeal by Congress when the amendment, alteration or repeal by Congress as and when
common good so requires. the common good so requires (PAGCOR v. BIR, G.R.
172087, 2011).
Participation of Foreign lnvesfors:
1. Shall be limited to their proportionate share in its Franchises can be granted to companies whose capital is
capital. at least 60% Filipino-owned. However, "capital" here [ ...
l. ,,,,>
2. Foreigners cannot be appointed as the executive and should be interpreted to include only voting shares. Hence,
managing officers because these positions are in the computation for "capital," only common stock will be l
i •
reserved for Filipino citizens (1987 Constitution, art. considered and not preferred shares. ( Gamboa, et al. v. ': ...:..·
XII, sec. 11). Finance Secretary, G.R. 176579, 2011).
Administrative agencies may be empowered by the SEC Memorandum Circular No. 8, s. 2013, was issued and { ..:.
Legislature by means of a law to grant franchises or similar provides that: all covered corporations shall, at all times,
authorizations. In this case, the Court ruled that the Toll observe the constitutional or statutory ownership 1 ,.
•.,;.
Regulatory Board (TRB) is empowered to grant a franchise requirement in that "the required percentage of Filipino
for toll road projects. PD 1112 provided further that the ownership shall be applied to BOTH (a) the total number
TRB has the power to amend or modify a Toll Operation of outstanding shares of stock entitled to vote in the
Certificate that it issued when public Interest so requires. election of directors; AND (b) the total number of
Accordingly, there is nothing infirm, much less outstanding shares of stock, whether or not entitled to vote
questionable, about the provision in the MNTC (Manila in the election of directors." (Roy Ill v. Herbosa, G.R. No.
North Tollways Corp.) Supplemental Toll Operation 204276, 2016)
Agreement allowing the substitution of MNTC in case it
defaults in its loans. While the TRB Is vested by law with Police Power and Expropriation over Public Utilities i......
ATENEO CENTRAL
BAR OPERATIONS 2019 POLITICAL LAW
1. Police Power - When public Interest requires, under prerogative has been delegated to it by Congress under
reasonable terms, the state may temporarily take over ·,CA 141. (Directorof lands v. Court of Appeals,G.R. 58867,
the operation of any privately owned public utility or 1984).
those with pubtic interest (1987 Constitution, art. XII,
sec. 17). Clas~ification should be categorical; a lard cannot have a
mixed classification. For example: an owner of an
• The nature and extent of the emergency is the
agricultural land in which minerals are discovered has no
measure of the duration and the terms of the
right to utilize such minerals. The State may discontinue
takeover.
his/her ownership after just cornpensa'Ion in order to
• Just compensation is not required. extract such minerals. (Republic v. Court of Appeals, G.R.
L-43938, 1988).
• This power is activated only when Congress declares
a state of national emergency.
Reclassification from forest reserves into non-forest
• 'Businesses affected with public interest' includes reserves - now exclusively a DENR prerogative. There is
businesses which are quite similar public utilities, no need to wait for Congressional concurrence. (Apex
such as those having mass-based consumers. Mining v. SoutheastMindanao Gold, G.R. 152613/152628,
2009).
2. Expropriation - The State may, upon payment of just
compensation, transfer to public ownership utilities and Limitations Regarding Allenabie Lands of Public
private enterprises to be operated by the government, Dominion
in the interest of national welfare or defense. (1987 Means by which Land of Public Dominion Becomes
Constitution, art. XII, sec. 18). · Private Land:
1. Acquired from the Government by purchase or grant.
( ACQUISITION. OWNERSHIP AND TRANSFER OF 2. Uninterrupted possession by the occupant and his
PUBLIC AND PRIVATE L~NO~ predecessors-in-interest since time immemorial.
3. Open, exclusive, and undisputed possession of
Lands of the public domain are classified into: MAN-F ALIENABLE (agricultural) public land for a period of 30
1. ~riculturnl years.
2. forest or timber a. Upon completion of the requisite period, the land
3. .Mineral lands becomes private property ipso jure without need of
4. National Parks (1987 Constitution, art. XJI, sec. 3). any judicial or other sanction.
b. Possession since 1time immemorial leads to the
Rule on Reclassification or Conversion of Lands presumption that the land was never part of public
·! ': Reclassification or conversion of lands require the positive domain.
....~
act of government, mare issuance of title is not enough. An c. In computing 30 years, start from when the land was
.
·:•.
'
1
affirmative act from the executive or legislative is converted to alienable land, not when it was still
necessary to reclassify property of public dominion. (Laurel forest land
v. Garcia, GR No. 92013, July 25, 1990) d. Presumption is always that land belongs to the
State.
Reclassification:
1. Public (mineral and agricultural) lands - exclusive NHA is an "end-user agency" authorized by law to
r. .'! prerogative of the executive department. But this is administer and dispose of reclaimed lands. The moment
only a delegated power. titles over reclaimed lands based on the special patents
2. Forest and national parks - Congress has the sole are transferred to the NHA by the Register of Deeds, they
power to reclassify. are automatically converted to patrimonial properties of the
State which can be sold to Filipino citizens and private
Classification is descriptive of the legal nature of the land corporations, 60% of which are owned by Filipinos.
and NOT what it looks !ike. Thus, the fact that forest land ( Chavez v. NHA, G.R. 164527, 20Cl7).
is denuded does not mean it is no longer forest land
(Secretary of DENR v. Yap, G.R. 167707, 2008). Reclaimed foreshore and submerged lands are lands of
·•
.. I
public domain, and can only be alienated as private
i Only the President, upon recommendation of the DENR property if it is classified by competent authority as
\;. ,·
secretary, may now classify lands of public domain. This alienable. (Republic v. Enciso, G.R. 160145, 2005).
Page 263 of 320
ATENEO CENTRAL
BAR OPERATIONS 2019 POLITICAL LAW
Filipino citizens
Can lease up to 500 hectares
Can ACQUIRE not more than 12 hectares by purchase,
homestead or grant
PRACTICE OF PROFESSION
The practice of all profession in the Philippines shall be ,'
limited to Filipino citizens save in cases prescribed by law.
{ 1987 Constitution, art. XII, sec. 14).
·----------···· ... -
ATENEO CENTRAL·
BAR OPERATIONS20t9 POLITICAL LAW
Nature of Policy
The policy of social Justice is not intended to countenance
wrongdoing simply because it is committed by the
underprivileged. At best it may mitigate the penalty but it
certainly will not condone the offense. Compassion for the
poor is an imperative of every humane society but only
(
when the recipient Is not a rascal claiming an undeserved
;
privilege. Social justice cannot be permitted to be refuge of
scoundrels any more than can equity be an impediment to
the punishment of the guilty. (International Schoo/ Manila
v. /SAE, G.R. No. 167286, 2014) .
Principal Activities
1. Creation of more economic oppcrtuntties and more
wealth
2. Closer regulation of the acquisition, ownership, use and
disposition of property in order to achieve a more
equitable distribution of wealth and political power.
3. Creation of economic opportunities based on freedom
of initiative and self-reliance.
----------------~------·----- _
..... .. __ -- ..... ------ .. ----- -
·········· . -------------
ATENEO CENTRAL
BAR OPERATIONS 2019 · POLITICAL LAW
NAMA-MCCH-NFL had not registered as a labor The NHA has authority to order relocation of persons and
organization. Not being a legitimate labor organization, demolition of their property as part of its mandate to
NAMA-MCCH-NFL is not entitled to those rights granted to improve blighted areas.
a legitimate labor organization under the Labor Code,
specifically: 1) To act as the representative of its members Lands acquired by the NHA for resettlement purposes or
for the purpose of collecnve bargaining; 2) To be certified housing development are exempt from the coverage of
as the exclusive iP-presentative of all the employees in an agrarian reform laws. Such acquisition converts the land
appropriate collective bargaining unit for purposes of by operation of law from agricultural to residential. The
collective bargaining ( Visayas Community Medical Center NHA is not bound to pay disturbance compensation to any
v. Erma Yballe, et al., G.R. 196156, 2014). tenant in possession of the purchased land (National
Housing Authority v. Department of Agrarian Reform
Agrarian Reform Adjudication Board, et al., G.R. 175200, 2010).
Eviction and demolition "in accordance with law and in a The State shall protect working women by providing safe
justand humane manner" does not mean that the validity and healthful working conditions, taking into account their
or legality of the demolition or eviction is hinged on the maternal functions, and such facilities and opportunities
existence of a resettlement area designated or earmarked that will enhance their welfare and enable them to realize
by the government." Rather, it means that "the person to their full potential in the service of the nation (Art. XIII,
be evicted be accorded due process or an opportunity to Sec. 14, Phil Const.)
controvert the allegation that his or her occupation or
possession of the property involved ls unlawful or against COMMISSION ON HUMAN RIGHTS
the will of the landowner; that should the illegal or
unlawful occupation be proven, the occupant be Composition: (5)
sufficiently notified before actual eviction or demolition is 1. Chairman and
done; and there be no loss of lives, physical injuries or 2. 4 members
unnecessary loss of or damage to properties (People v.
Leachon, G.R. Nos. 108725-726, 1998). Qualifications:25
Natural-born citizens of the Philippines
Health Majority of the Commission must be members of the
The State shall adopt an integrated and comprehensive Philippine bar
approach to health development which shall endeavor to
make essential goods, health and other social services The appointment of the CHR members is not subject to CA
available to all the people at affordable cost. There shall confirmation; and the CHR is not of the same level as the
be priority for the needs of the underprivileged sick, COMELEC, CSC, or COA.
elderly, disabled, women, and children. The State shall
(. endeavor to provide free medical care to paupers. (Art. Powers: (IAC-PE2RM-IRAO)
;
XIII, Sec. 11, _Phil Const.) 1. !nvestigate all forms of human rights violations
involving civil or political rights, and recommend.26
In the article, there are two principles premised on the ' 2. Adopt operational guidelines and rules of procedure.
understanding that the high level of health of the people 3. Cite for g,ontempt for violations of its rules, in
and of the country can be attained only through a c,-;cordance with the Rules of Court.
combination of social, economic, political, and cultural 4. frovide appropriate legal measures for the protection
conditions. Integration connotes a unified health delivery of the human rights of all persons, within the
system, a combination of private and public sectors, and Philippines, as well as Filipinos residing abroad, and
a blend of western medicine and traditional health care provide for preventive measures and legal aid services
modalities. Comprehensiveness includes health to the underprivileged whose human rights have been
promotion, disease prevention, education, and planning. violated or need protection.27
And all of these are a recognition of the people's right to. 5. .sxercise visitorial powers over jails, prisons and other
•<:> health. (Bernas, Comprehensive Reviewer, 2011) · detention facilities.
6. !;.stablish continuing programs for research, education
Women and information in order to enhance respect for the
primacy of human rights.
25
Note: The term of office, other qualifications, and
disabilities shall be provided by law.
26
Notes: 27
Notes:
1. Violations may be committed by public officers or • The CHR can initiate court proceedings on behalf of
by clvilians or rebels. victims of human rights violations.
2. CHR cannot investigate violations of social rights. • The CHR can recommend the prosecution of human
3. CHR has NO adjudicatory powers over cases rights violators, but it cannot itself prosecute these
. involving human rights violations. cases.
4. They cannot investigate cases where no rights . • The CHR cannot issue restraining orders or
are violated. e.g., There is no right to occupy injunctions against alleged human rights violators.
government land (squat). Therefore, eviction These must be obtained from the regular courts.
therefrom ts NOT a human rights violation.
----·.end of topic----
'
J ,
'_)
I
l
"·· ,.·-
r~
i:..;;:
' ·-·
r:· ;\
;'~_;..i
r:
•! __ .1
XV.FAMILY
Integrated System of Education
1. Free movement from one school to another; or public
TOPIC OUTLINE UNDER THE SYLLABUS
to private and back. So this means there Is the same
A. Rights
program.
2. Free public education in elemontary and HS levels. The State recognizes the Filipino family as the foundation
c. Elementary education is compulsory of the nation. Accordingly, it shall strengthen its solidarity
d. But it cannot be subject to penal sanction; It is a and actively promote its total development (CONST. Art.
moral, not legal compulsion. XV, Sec.1)
Historic Sites
The Court held that there was no violation of the I
\. .
'
XVI. AMENDMENTS OR REVISIONS OF THE Each House may separately formulate amendments by a
CONSTITUTION vote of 3/4 of all its members, and then pass it on to the
other house for similar process. Nothing is said about joint
sessions (Bernas, The 1987 Philippine Constitution: a
TOPIC OUTLINE UNDER THE SYLLABUS
Comprehensive Reviewer, 544, 2011 ).
A. Procedure to amend or revise the Constitution
Even in a joint session, they must still vote separately
Amendment because Congress is bicameral.
An alteration of one or a few specific separable provisions
of the Constitution. The chanqss brought about by Constitutional Convention (ConCon)
amendments will not affect the other provisions of the Congress may call a ConCon by a 2/3 vote of all its
Constitution (Bernas, 1987 Philippinf; Constitution: A members, or
Commentary, 1345, 2009). By a majority vote of all its members, Congress may submit
to the electorate the question of calling a ConCon.
An addition or change within the lines of the original
constitution as will effect an improvement, or better carry Notes:
out the purpose for which it was framed; a change that The choice of either a constituent assembly or
adds, reduces or deletes without altering the basic constitutional convention for the purpose of intiating
principles involved; affects only the specific provision being amendments or revisions is left to the discretion of
amended. [Lambino v. COMELEC, G.R. No.174153. Conqress. In other words,'it is a political question.
October 25, 2006
The manner of calling a ConCon is subject to judicial
Examples: review, because the Constitution has provided for voting
a change reduc:ing the voting age from 18 years to 15 requirements.
years;
a change reducing Filipino ownership 'Jf mass media If Congress, acting as a ConAss, calls for a ConCon but
companies from 100% to 60%; a change requiring a does not provide the details for the calling of such ConCon,
college degree as an additiona: qualification for election to Congress -- exercising its ordinary legislative power -
the Presidency (Lambino v. COMELEC, G.R. No. 174153, may supply such details. But in so doing, Congress (as
2006). legislature) should not transgress the resolution of
Congress acting as a constituent assembly (Bernas, The
Necessary Steps to Give Effect to Amendments or 1987 Philippine Constitution: a Comprehensive Reviewer,
t. Revisions (PSR) 544-545, 2011).
1. f
roposal of amendments or revisions by the proper
( ···~. Congress, as a ConAss and the ConCon, has no power to
\._:, constituent assembly
appropriate money for their expenses. Money may be
2. §ubmission of the proposed amendments or revisions
spent from the treasury only pursuant to an appropriation
-; ,; to the people
made by law. However, the constitutional convention is
3. Batificat;on
free to dispose the funds appropriated by Congress for the
Convention's operation (Bernas, The 1987 Philippine
Ways of Proposing Amendments:
Constitution: a Comprehensive Reviewer, 545, 2011).
Constituent Assembly (ConAss)
Acting as a Constituent Assembly, the Congress by itself People's Initiative
-; )
may propose amendments by 3/4 vote of all its members. For a valid People's Initiative, there must be:
.c ·~ The power of Congress to propose amendments is NOT 5. Petition to propose such amendments must be signed
part of its ordinary legislative power. Congress possesses by at least 12% of all registered voters.
constituer.t power only because it has been specifically
6. Every legislative district must be represented by at
given that power by and under the conditions of Article XVII
least 3% of the registered voters therein.
(Bernas, The 1987 Philippine Constitution: a
·~·-··f 'While the substance of the proposals made by each type
Comprehensive Reviewer, 544, 2011, citing Gonzales v.
of ConAss is not subject to judicial review, the manner the
COMELEC, G.R. No. L-28196, 1967).
proposals were made is subject to judicial review.
Since a ConAss owes their existence to the Constituton, Quantitative test - The court examines only the number
the courts may determine whether the assembly has acted of provisions affected and does not consider the degree of
in accordance with the Constitution. like: the change. Whether the proposed change ts so extensive
Whether a proposal was approved by the required nurnber in its provision as to change directly the "substance
of votes in Congress (acting as a constituent assembly). entirety" of the Constitution by the deletion or alteration of
Whether the approved proposals were properly submitted numerous provisions.
to the people for ratification. Qualitative test - Inquires into the qualitative effects of
Notes: the proposed change in the Constitution. The main inquiry
is whether the change will "accomplish such far-reaching
• The electorate can propose through initiative ONLY
. changes in the nature of our basic governmental plan as to
amendments, since it would be practically impossible to
amount to a revision" (Lambino v. COMELEC, G.R. No.
have an over-all review of the Constitution through
174153, 2006).
action by the entire electoral population.
• No amendment through a People's lnltiative shall be Ways of Proposing Revisions
authorized within 5 years following the ratiflcatlon of the By Congress, upon a vote of 3/4 of its members
1987 Constitution. (February 2, 1987)'nor
By a Constitutional Convention ·
• More often than once ever/ 5 years. The Congress shall
provide for the implementation of the exercise of this Doctrine of Proper Submission
right. (Art. XVII, Sec.2) A plebiscite may be held on the same day as a regular
• Revision of the Constitution cannot be effected through election [Gonzales v. COMELEC, 21 SCRA 774}. The
initiative and referendum. Formulation of provisions entire Constitution must be submitted for ratification at one
revising the Constitution requires both cooperation and plebiscite only. The people must have a proper "frame of
debate which can only be done through a collegial body. reference". [Tolentino v. COMELEC, 41 SCRA 702]. No
(BERNAS) "piecemeal submission," e.g. submission of age
amendment ahead oi other proposed amendments.
Revision [Lambino v. COMELEC, G.R. No.174153. October 25,
2006}
A re-examination of the entire Constitution or of
provisions which have over-all implications for the entire
N.B. The process of revision is the same in all respects
Constitution to determine how and to what extent it should
except that it cannot be proposed via a People's Initiative.
be altered. A revision implies substantive change, affecting
[See Lambino, supra)
the Constitution as a whole ~Bernas, 1987 Philippine
Consthution: A Commentary, 1345, 2009).
Judicial Review of Amendments
A change that alters a basic principle in the constitution, The validity of the process of amendment is not a political
like altering the principle of separation of powers or the question because the Court must review if constituUonal
system of checks-and-balances; alters the substantial processes were followed. [See Lambino, supra]
entirety of the constitution, as when the change affects
substantial provisions of the constitution. Ratification of Proposal if made through ConAss or
ConCon
Examples: Amer.dments and revisions are valid when ratified by a
altering the principle of separation of powers or the system majority of votes cast in a plebiscite.
of checks-and-balances; Plebiscite is held not earlier than 60 days nor later than 90
a switch from the presidential system to a parliamentary days from the approval of such amendments or revisions.
system: ~·.-i. .
·-:,·
a switch from a brcameral system to a unicameral system Ratification of Proposal _If made through Poople's
(Lambino v. COMELEG, G.R. No. 174153, 2006). Initiative
Valid when ratified by a majority of votes cast in a
plebiscite.
Two-part test in determining whether a proposal
involves an amendment or revision. ' .
' ..i
·------------ .... --
ATENEO CENTRAL
BAR OPERATIONS 2019 POLITICAL LAW
AMENDMENT REVISION
The determination of the conditions under which proposed
amendments/revisions are submitted to the people falls Change In the Constitution
within the legislative sphere. That Congress could have
done better does not make the steps taken invalid. Purpose is to Purpose Is to
improve specific parts examine entirety
1--~--~~~~~~--1.
All the proposed amendments or revisions made by the
constituent assemblies must be submitted for ratification in Affects only the specific Affects several provisions
one single plebiscite. There cannot be a piece-meal provision amended
ratification of amendments/revisions. Adds, reduces, deletes Affects
without basic principles
All the amendments to be proposed by the same altering basic principle
Convention must be submitted to the people in a single Affects
"election" or plebiscite (Tolentino v. COMELEC, G.R. No. substantial entirety
L-34150, 1971).
Ex: extending term limit of Ex: shift from presidential
Presidential proclamation is NOT required for effectivity of House Representatives to parliamentary system
amendments/revisions.
.,
Can be done by: How Ratification
Amendments 1.Congress (Constituent By a vote of 3/4 of all its Through a plebiscite, 60-90
Assembly I ConAss) members days after submission of the
amendments
By a 2/3 vote of all the members
of Congress; or
2. Constitutional Convention
By a majority vote of all its
(Cancan)
.r , members. Congress may submit
to the electorate the question of
calling a ConCon
. ·-·-.. --,------·-·-·-·-·---·-----------------'
ATENEO CENTRAL
BAR OPERATIONS 2019 POLITICAL LAW
Case Title Facts Held+ Ratio the general There was a proper
elections scheduled submission.
Mabanag Resolution of Petition dismissed. on Nov. 1967.
v.Lopez Congress Proposal of
Vito (1947) proposing the Parity amendments to the
Amendment was constitution is a Tolentino Validity of a Petition granted. All
assailed on the political question. v. CONCON amendments
ground that it did The enrolled copy of COMELEC Resolution proposed by the
not comply with the the resolution in (1971) (submitting, for · same Constitutional
314 rule prescrlbe« which it was certltied ratification, the Convention shall be
by the Constitution. that the proposal proposal to lower submitted to the
had been approved the voting age to people in a single
by the required vote 18) was assailed. etection.
was conclusive upon The question here
the courts. is whether
piecemeal
Modified by amendments to the
Gonzales, and Constitution could
Tolentino be submitted to the
people for
ratification or
Gonzales RBH No. 1 called Petition denied. rejection.
v. for an increase in
COMELEC the membership of Proposal of
(1967) the HOR; RBH No. amendments is not Planas v. Petitioners seek to Petition dismissed.
2 called for a a political but a COMELEC enjoin respondents The issue of validity
Constitutional justiciable question {1973) from implementing of e&lling for a
Convention; and subject to judicial PD 73, which called plebiscite
RBH No. 3 called review. for a plebiscite {to (submission) is
for the amendment be held on January justiciable; BUT,
of Sec. 1 a, Art.VI to Congress may 15, 1373) for the issue became moot.
allow members of propose constitution
Congress to amendments and at approved by the
become delegates the same time call CONCON on 1972,
to the CONCON for a Constituent on the theory that:
without losing their Assembly. (a) the power to
seats. Petitioners submit is lodged
r ?
seek to restrain Ratification may be exclusively in '- .... .r
respondents from done simultaneously Congress, and (b)
enforcing the law there is no proper I
passed by
with a general
election or in a . submission to the
(_,:
Congress special election people.
submitting RBH called specifically for
Nos. 1 and 2 for that purpose. '
ratification during
Page 274 of 320
·------------'-------------· -- . .
ATENEO CENTRAL
BAR OPERATIONS2019 POLITICAL LAW
The system of
initiative found in
Mitra v. Petitioners argue Even without valid Article XVII, Sec. 2
("' COMELEC that the 1973 ratification, a new is not self-executory.
(1981) Constitution never Constitution could It needs an enabling
validly took effect, come Into force and law before the right
Javellana aside, on effect by the of the people could
the theory that the acquiescence of the be exercised.
1973 Constitution people. Popular However, an
wa& still and is still acquiescence to a examination of its
:, __ ~ at the stage of new Constitution provisions reveals
proposal. They ask gives the document that RA 6735 is
..". :J the Court to order a the force and effect incomplete,
plebiscite for the of the Fundamental inadequate, or
ratification of the Law of the Land, wanting in essential
l
1973 Constitution. regardless of the terms and conditions
method of insofar as initiative
ratification. If it is on amendments to
accepted by the the Constitution is
people (as shown by concerned.
their participation in
several elections
and referenda since
:
'·:_ J
' then), in whom
'
'i~_.,,-·,;..
ff' -,;
'-.:.--'
t ,,
( _.;.
---------------·-· -- .. ---
ATENEO CENTRAL
BAR OPERATIONS 2019 POLITICAL LAW
•w-
ATENEO CENTRAL
. BAR OPERATIONS 2019 · POLITICAL LAW
.....
·- il
·a ·~
,r -.
~..]
• .. /
B.REL6.TIONSHIP EIETWEEN INTERNATIONAL AND international law and domestic law belong to only one
system of law.
INTERNATIONAL LAW DOMESTIC LAW i. Theory 1: Municipal law subsumes
and is superior to international law
Scope ii. Theory 2: International law is superior
to domestic law
The conduct of States and Apply to a single country or
2. Dualism - International law and national iaw are
international organizations, nation, within a determined
essentially different from each other as tosource (i.e.
their relations with each territory and it.s inhabitants.
in certain municipal law is a product of local custom or legislation;
other and,
circumstances, their whereas sources of international law are treaties and
relations with persons, custom grown among states.); as regards the relations
natural or juridical. they regulate (i.e. municipal law regulated relations
[American Third between individual persons under the state; whereas
Restatement] international law regulates relations between states);
and lastly, as to substance (i.e. municipal law is a law
How Made of the sovereiqn over individuals whereas international
' law is a law between sovereign states) (Bernas, Public
Through consent, adopted Issued by a political InternationalLaw, 2009)
by States as a common rule superior for observance.
of action.
MONISM DUALISM
Relations Regulated
Monists have a unitary Domestic and international law
Regulates relations of Regulates relations · of concept of law and see are INDEPENDENT of each
States and other individuals among all laws (both other.
international persons themselves or with their international and
own States. municipal law) as an Municipal Law International
integral part of the Law
Sources SAME SYSTEM. If
conflict exists between regulate regulates
Derived principally from Consists· mainly of international law and relations of relations
treaties, intematlonal enactments from the municipal law, individuals between
custom and general lawmaking authority of international law must under a state states
principles of law. (ICJ, each State. prevail.
Stat., art. 38(1 )) a product of dorived from
local custom or such sources
Settlement of Disputes legislation as
international
By means of State-to-State By rneans of local customs, (~
'
transactions. administrative and judicial conventions, '·, ..;;.
processes. or genel'al
principles of
Responsibility law
Collective responsibility Breach of domestic law law of the international
because it attaches directly entails individual sovereign over law is a law
to the State and not to its responsibility.
nationals. _J individual between
sovereign
states
NATIONAL LAW
-;__. :~
.
within a state, it Is only because ii has been expressly '·'
1. Monism - there is no substantial distinction between incorporatert by municipal law. The Philippines is a ·,·
international law and municipal law. Under this theory, dualist state. ... ...
Theories as to Manner of Adopting International Law declare a treaty unconstitutional. (Bernas, Public
as Part of the Law of the State International Law, 2009)
1. Doctrine of Incorporation -A State is, by reason of
its membership in the family of nations, bound by the Conflict between Treaty and Domestic Leglslation
generally accepted principles of international law, the When the two instruments relate to the same subject, try
same being considered as part of its own laws. to give effect to both; if inconsistent, the later in date will
2. Doctrine of Transformation -This is based on a control, provided that the treat} stipulation is self-
strict dualist approach. Since the two systems are executing. But this rule only applies in the domestic
distinct and operate separately, for international law to sphere. A treaty, even if contrary to a later statute, is
become part of domestic law it must be expressly and binding in international law.
specifically transformed into domestic law through the
appropriate constitutional machinery such as an act of Fitzmaurice Compromise
Congress or Parliament. (Bernas, Public lntemational Assumes that since the two systems, international and
Law, 2009) national law, do not operate in common field, they can
never come into conflict. Each one of them is supreme in
Types of Transformation Theories its own domain, thereby any apparent conflict In the
1. Hard Transformation Theory - Only legislation can domestic field is automatically settled by the domestic
transform International Law into domestic law. Courts conflict rules of the forum and any conflict in the
may apply International L.aw only when authorized by international field would be resolved by International Law.
legislatlon
2. Soft Transformation Theory - Either a judicial or C. SOURCES OF OBLIGATIONS IN INTERNATIONAL
legislative act of a state can transform International ~ J
Law into domestic law.
DOCTRINE OF DOCTRINE OF
Conflict Between International and Municipal Law INCORPORATION TRANSFORMATION··~
A. International Rule or Conflict Resolved by The rules of international The generally accepted
International Tribunal- Before an international law form part of the law of rules of international law
tribunal, a state may not plead its own law as an excuse the land, and no further are not per se binding
for failure to comply with international law. A State, legislative action is upor, the State but must
which has contracted valid international obligations, needed to make such first be embodied in
'<, ,
must modify its laws to ensure fulfillment of its rules applicable in the legislation enacted by the
obligations under the treaty, unless the constitutional
domestic sphere. lawmaking body and so
violation is manifest and concerns a rule of internal law
of fundamental importance. National laws must yiela to transformed into municipal
the laws of nations because international law provides Incorporation is law. Only when so
the standards by which legality of State conduct is to recognized by the transformed will they
,:.' ~ be determined. Constitution. (e.g. become binding upon the
•.,. .,· B. Municipal Rule er Conflict Resolved by Local customs and general State as part of its
Court-When the conflict comes before a domestic principles of international municipal law, (e.g. treaty
court, domestic courts are bound to apply the domestic law)(1987 Constitution, obligations)
law. Rules of international law are given a standing
. . equal, not superior, to national leglslativ€ enactments .
art. 2, §2)
1...J
Should a conflict arise between an international
agreement and the Constitution, the treaty would not "SOURCES" OF INTERNATIONAL LAW ACCORDING
be valid and operative as domestic law. It does not, TO ARTICLE 38(1). ICJ STATUTE
however, lose its character as international law. The Court, whose function is to decide in accordance with
international law such disputes as are submitted to it, shall
apply:
Conflict between a State's Constitution and
International Law a. international conventions or treaties, whether general
or particutar, establishing rules expressly recoqnizeo
When the constitutional violation is manifest and concerns by contesting states;
a rule of internal law of fundamental l-nportance, State may
b. international custom, as evidence of a general practice
deviate from treaty obligation. Should a conflict arise
accepted as law;
between an international agreP.ment and the Constitution, 'c. the general principles of law recognized by civilized
the treaty would not be valid and operative as domestic
nations;
law. The Constitution, in Article VIII, Section 5, 2(a)
explicitly recognizes the power of the Supreme Court to
Page 281 of 320
-- ------------------
ATENEO CENTRAL
BAR OPERATIONS 2019 POLITICAL LAW
d. subject to the provisions of Article 59, judicial decisions Under the principle of pacta sunt servanda, a state party to
and the teachings of the most highly qualified publicists a treaty is bound to comply with the obligations it assumed
of the various nations, as subsidiary means for the ,. under such treaty In good faith. [VCLT, art. 26}
determination of rules of law. ·
2. Custom
Primary Sources: TCG
Definition
1. Treaties: Conventional International Law; International
General and consister-t practice of States followed by them
conventio.is, whether general or particular.
from a sense of legal obligation. (Restatement (Third) of
establishing rules expressly recognized by the
Foreign Relations Law of the Unites States)
contracting states
2. fustomary International Law: International custom, as
Elements of International Custom
evidence of a general practice accepted as law;
3. ~neral Principles of Law: General principles of law . 1. State Practl~e (DUG) - A consistent ·and uniform
recognized by civilized nations. [ICJ Statute, art. . · external conduct of States. Generally, both what
38(1 )(aHc)] . States say and what they do . are considered state
practice.
Subsidiary Sources (JT) a. .Quratlon of practice
('I) Judicial decisions and b. Yniformity, consistency of practice
c. Qenerality (majority of specially affected States)
(2) Teachings of the most highly qualified publicists of the
various nations. fJCJ Statute, art. 38(1 )(d)] 2. OPIN/0 JURIS S/VE NECESSITAT/S (OPINIO
JURIS) - As an element in the formation of customary
Notes: norm in international law, it is required that States, in
their conduct amounting to general practice, must act
• While the primary sources create law, the subsidiary out a sense of legal duty and not only by the motivation
sources constitute evidence of what the law is. of courtesy, convenience or tradition.
• There is no stare decisis: Case law is considered only a
"subsidiary means." Even the decisions of the ICJ itself Not only must acts amount to a settled practice, but they
do not create binding precedent, since it only binds the must also be such or be carried out in such a way, as to be
parties and in respect of the particular case [ICJ Statute, evidence of a belief that this practice is rendered
art. 59}. obligatory by the existence of a rule of law requiring it.
• Teachings of publicists may include the work of (International Court of Justice in the North Sea Continental
organizations such as the International Law Shelf ceseo, cited in Mijares v. Ranada, G.R. No. 139325,
Commission (a UN body) and private institutions.
2005)
'----------·. .. - ..
ATENEO CENTRAL
BAR OPERATIONS 2019 POLITICAL LAW
but extending to the high seas [Asaall v, Commissioner 4. Circumstantial evidence is admitted as indirect
(1968)]. evidence in all systems of law and its use is recognized
by international decisions. Such circumstantial
3. General Principles of Law evidence. however, must consist of a series of facts or
events that lead to a single conclusion [Corfu Channel
Definition
Case (ICJ, 1949)). ·
Principles based on natural justice common to most 5. 'Jurisdictional principles, such as the power of a
national systems of law. These refer to those general tribunal to determine the extent of its own jurisdiction
principles in municipal Jaw (particularly those of private {competence de la competence).
law) that may be appropriated to apply to the relations of
states [OPPENHEIM]. (e.g., good faith, estoppal,
exhaustion of local remedies, unjust enrichment). Secondary Sources:
4. Judicial Decisions.
The ban on enforced disappearance is a generally A subsidiary means for the determination of rules of law
accepted principle of inlernational law which is considered that are acceptable so long as they correctly interpret and
part of the law of the 'and (Razon v. Tagitis, G.R. No. apply international law.
182498, 2009). Note, however, that RA 10353 (An Act
Defining and Penalizing Enforced or Involuntary Decisions of riational courts, when applying international
Disappearance) was passed on December 21, 2012. law. are acceptable.
The Yogyakarta Principles (the Application of International Stare Decises does not Apply
Human Rights Law In Relation to Sexual Orientation and The ICJ Statute directs the Court to apply judicial decisions
Gender Identity) has not yet evirlced an obligatory norm in as subsidiary mean for the determination of the rules of.
the Philippines. There are declarations and obligations law, but this is made subject to ArL 59 of the same statute,
outlined in said Principles which are not reflective of the which states that, 'the decisions of the court have no
current state of international law, and do not find basis in binding force except between the parties and in respect of
any of the sources of international law enumerated under that particular case".
Article 38(1) of the Statute of the International Court of
Justice. (Ang Lad/ad LGBT Party v. COMELEC. G.R. No.
5. Teachings of the Most Highly Qualified Publicists
190582, 2010).
(/CJ .Statute, art. 38)
The word 'publicist' means 'learned writer.' Learned
The following principles are considered general principles
writings, like judicial decisions, can be evidence of
of international law:
customary law, and can also play a subsidiary role in
Roman law principles;
developing new rules of law.
1. Principles such as estoppal, res judicata, res inter alias
acta, and prescription; e.g. With respect to estoppel,
Highly-qualified publicists are writers whose main value
when Thailand did not object to, and has in fact
· depends on the extent to which their books and articles are
benefited from, the, Treaty of 1904 for 50 years. it is
cited as wo.-ks of scholarship {i.e based on thorough { "
deemed to have accepted said treaty. It is thereby
research Into what the law is said to be {lex lata) rather ·
precluded from questioning Annex I thereof, which
than comparing the views of other writers as to what they
showed that the Temple of Preah Vihear was within
think the law out to be (lex ferenda).
Cambodian territory [Temple of Preah Vihear Case
(ICJ, 1962)).
2. Other substantive principles, such as the duty to make Requisites For A "Highly Qualified Publicist"
reparations [Chorzow Factory Case (PCIJ, 1927)]. 1. Fair and impartial representation of law.
principle of reciprocity, pacta sunt servanda, separate 2. Acknowledged authori!y in the field.
corporate personality [see Barcelona Traction Case
(ICJ, ·1970)); D.SUBJECTS ,I.. J
. -~"
ATENEO CENTRAL
BAR OPERATIONS 2019 POLITICAL LAW
--------·-·---··.
ATENEO CENTRAL
BAR OPERATIONS 2019 POLITICAL LAW
The Concept of Association of States have functional personality which is limited to what is
An association is formed when two States of unequal necessary to carry out their functions as found In the
power voluntarily establish durable links. In the basic instruments of the organization.
model, one State, the associate, delegates certain
responsibilities to tne other, the principal, while maintaining Generally, special personality:
its international status as a State. However, this concept is The status and powers of an international organization is
not recognized uncJer the present Constitution. The determined by agreement and not by general or customary
Constitution does not contemplate any State in this international law. They are considered subjects of
jurisdiction other than the Philippine State, much less does international law "if their legal personality is established by
it provide for a transitory status that aims to prepare any their constituent instrument."
part of Philippine territory for independence (The Province Further, its constituent rights and duties, or capacities and
of North Cotabato v. GRP Panel on Ancestral Domains,
immunities. arE:: limited to those set forth in the treaty
G.R. No. 183591, 2008).
creating the International organization. Thus, legal
personality in this context is a relative concept.
Principle of State Continuity [MAGALLONA]
The State continues as a juristic being notwithstanding the
changes in its circumstances, provided only that such Exception:
changes do not result In the loss of any of its essential United Nations: The United Nations has objective
elements. · ·
international personality. Its personality is binding on the
whole international community, including States who are
Rights of States not UN members. [Reparations for Injuries Advisory
1. Jurisdiction Opinion (ICJ, 1949)]
2. Equality
3. Individual or collective Self-Defense Preconditions for international personality
4. Independence 1. It must constitute a permanent assodalion of states,
5. Legation (the right of the State to send and receive with lawful objects, equipped with organs;
diplomatic missions, which enables States to carry on , 2. There must be a distinction, in terms of legal powers
friendly intercourse) and purposes, between the organization and its
member states; and
Duties of States 3. ll must have legal powers that it may exercise on the
1. To carry out in good faith all its obligat:ons; intemational plane and not solely within the national
'• ...
2. To refrain from recognizing any territorial acquisition systems of one or more states. [BROWNLIE]
by another State which resorts to war or to the use of
threat or force; National Societies
3. To refrain from giving assistance to any State which National societies such as the Philippine National Red
resorts to war or threat or use of force, or against which Cross act as auxiliaries to the public authorities of their
. .. the UN is taking preventive or enforcement actions own countries in the humanitarian field and provide a range
~.,.) 4. [o conduct its relations with other States in of services including disaster relief and health and social
accordance with International Law programmes. National societies were held to be
;, I
5. To ensure that conditions prevailing in its territory do organizations that are directly regulated by international
not menace international peace and order . humanitarian law, in contrast to other ordinary private
6. To refrain from resorting to war and the threat or use entities, including NGOs. The auxiliary status of a Red
of force Cross Society means that it is at the same lime a private
7. To treat all persons under its jurisdiction with respect institution and a public service organization, because the
for human rights and fundamental rights, without very nature of its work implies cooperation with the
discrimination authorities, a link with the State. The PNRC, as a national
·.· .. .., society of the International Red Cross and Red Crescent
8. To refrain from intervening
Movement, can neither "be classified as an instrumentality
i . 9. To settle its disputes with other States by peaceful
'-. > of the State, so as not to lose its character of neutrality" as
means
well as its independence, nor strictly be as a private
'·..:: •'
. corporation, since it is regulated by international
International Organizations humanitarian law and is treated as an auxiliary of the State.
·f.:: .)'
Definition (Uban v. Gordon, G.R. No. 175352, 2011)
International orqanlzations are created by sovereign
States and whose functioning are regulated by
• ... · international law. not the law of any given country. They
Page 287 of 320
.. ,
ATENEO CENTRAL
BAR OPERATIONS 2019 POLITICAL LAW
lndivlduats Corporations
Under modern international law, an individual has limited "Internationalized contracts" between a foreign
personality. corporation and a State gives the corporatio~ limited
personality by invoking in international law the rrghts that.
The question whether the Philippine government should may be derived from the contract.
espouse claims of its nationals against a foreign
government is a foreign relations matter, the authority for Incomplete Subjects
which is demonstrably committed by our Constitution not 1. Protectorates : Dependent states which have control
to the courts but to the political branches. In the Comfort over their interna! affairs but whose external affairs are
Women Case, the Executive Department has decided that controlled by another state.
it is to the best interest of the country to waive all claims of 2. Federal State : Union of previously autonomous
its nationals for reparations against Japan in the Treaty of entities. The central organ will have personality in
Peace of 1951. The wisdom of such decision is not for the lnternational law, but the extent of the international
courts to question; thus, said determination by the personality of the component entities can be a
Executive Department cannot be questioned through a problem. ·
petition for certiorari. (Vinuya v, Romulo G.R. No. 162230, 3. Mandate and Trust Territories : Territories placed by
2010). the League of Nations under one or other of the
victorious allies of WWI.
Special personality
Individuals may assume the status of subjects of
E. JURISDICTION OF STATES ·
international law only on the basis of agreernent by states
and in specific context, not in accordance with general or
customary international law. OVERVIEW
Definition
Examples Jurisdiction means the power of a state under international
a. UNCLOS, art. 187(c)-{e) provides for jurisdiction of the law to govern persons and property by its municipal law.
Sea-Bed Disputes Chamber of the ITLOS over This may be criminal or civil, and may be exclusive or
disputes between parties to contracts relating to the . concurrent with other states. [HARRIS)
exploitation of marine resources. Parties to such ·
contracts may be natural or juridical persons. Kinds of Jurisdictlo»
b. The Claims Settlement Declaration of 1981 between a. Prescriptive jurisdiction refers to the power of a State
US and Iran provides for direct access to the Iran-US to make Its law applicable to the activities, relations, or
Claims Tribunal to individuals for the settlement of their · status of persons, or the Interests of persons in things,
claims involving more than $250,000 either against whether by legislation, by executive act or order, by
Iran or the US. administrative rule or regulation, or by determination by
c. The Mixed Claims Tribunals established in the Treaties a court.
of Peace concluded at the end of World War I prcvided b. Adjudicative jurisdiction refers to a State's
for locus standi of individuals In actions against states jurisdiction to subject persons or things to the process
relating to contracts, debts, and property adversely of its courts or administrative tribunals, whether in civil
affected by the war. or in crimina: proceedings, whether or not the state is a
d. The London Agreement of the International Military party to the proceedings.
Tribunal at Nurernberq, relating to crimes against c. Enforcement jurisdiction refers to a State's
peace, war crimes and crimes against humanity, jurisdiction to enforce or compei compliance or to
imposed duties and liabilities upon individuals as well punish noncompliance with its laws or regulations,
as upon states. whether through the courts or by use of executive,
e. Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the administrative, police, or other nonjudicial action.
Crime of Genocide, art. VI defined "parties charged
with genocide" as including individuals. [MAGALLONAJ Basis of jurisdiction
f. The International Criminal Court has jurisdiction over (a) Territoriality Principle
individuals who commit genocide, crimes against
humanity and war crimes, subject to conditions under The fundamental source of Jurisdiction is sovereignty over
the ICC Statute. [ICC Stat., art. 25(1} in relation to art. territory. A State has absolute, thouqn not necessarily
5} exclusive. power to prescribe, adjudicate, and enforce
rules for conduct within its territory.
--~
! .
i
Page 288 of 320 ' .e
ATENEO CENTRAL
BAR OPERATIONS 2019 POLITICAL LAW
(b) Nationality Principle the choice of a forum which is not the natural or proper
Every State has jurisdiction over its nationals even when forum, either on the ground of convenience of trial or
those nationals are outside the State. the residence or domicile of parties or of its being the
locus contractus, or locus solutionis. Its appllcation is
discretionary on the part of the court. Forum
(c) Protective Principle
conveniens presumption is with the plaintiff. (Piper
A State may exercise jL•risdiction over conduct outside its Aircraft Co. v. Reyno, 545 U.S. 235, 1981).
territory that threatens it~ security, as long as that conduct • Under the rule of forum non conveniens, a
· is generally recognizer! as criminal by the States in the Philippine court orragency may assume jurisdiction
international community. over the case if it chooses to do so, provided: (1)
that the Philip;,ine court is one to which the parties
(d) Universality Prlnclple may conveniently resort to; (2) that the Philippine
. Recognizes that certain offenses are so heinous and so court is in a position to make an intelligent decision
widely condemned that any State, if it captures the as to the law and the facts; and (3) that the
offender, may prosecute and punish that person on behalf Philippine court has or is likely to have power to
of the international community, regardless of the nationality enforce its decision. (Manila Hotel v. NLRC, G.R.
of the offender or victim or where the crime was committed. No. 120077, 2000).
ATENEO CENTRAL
BAR OPERATIONS 2019 POLITICAL LAW
organization to the authority of the local courts would afford Immunity as a customary norm
a convenient medium thru which the host government may · The principle of sovereign immunity from suits ts a
interfere in their operations or even influence or control its customary norm of International law that holds, unless
policies and decisions of the organization; besides, such waived by the state concerned.
subjection to local jurisdiction would impair the capacity of
such body to discharge its responsibilities impartially on Such immunity applies even if the claim against the state
behalf of its member-elates. (Southeast Asian Fisheries v. is for violation of a jus cogens norm in international law.
NLRC, G.R. No. 86773, 1992).
Furthermore, State assets are also lmmune from execution
There are basically three propositions underlying the grant in connection with such claim. [Jurisdictional Immunities of
of International immunities to international organizations. the State Case (ICJ, 2012)1 ·
These principles, contained in the ILO Memorandum are
stated thus:
Who determines immunity in the Phlllpphres?
1. International institutions should have a status which
protects them against control or interference by any Under Philippine law, the DFA's function includes the
one government in the performance of functions for the -, determination of persons and institutions covered by
effective discharge of which they are responsible to diplomatic immunities. While exclusive to the DFA, the
democratically constituted international bodies in which DFA's determination is not conclusive. Even with a DFA
all the nations concerned are represented; certification, however, the court is not precluded from
2. No country should derive any national financial making an inquiry into the intrinsic correctness of such
advantage by levying fiscal charges on common certification. [China Nat'I Machinery & Equipment Corp.
international funds; and (Group) v. Sta. Maria (2012), or the Northrail Case)
3. The international orqanzanon should, as a collectivity
of States members, be accorded the facilities for the Criminal Jurisdiction on board merchant ships and
conduct of its official business customarily extended to government ships operated for commercial purpose
each other by its individual member States. The criminal jurisdiction of the coastal State should not be
(International Catholic Immigration Commission v. · exercised on board a foreign ship passing through the
Calleja. G.R. No. 85750, 1990) territorial sea to arrest any person or to conduct any
investigation in connection with any crime committed on
Doctrine of State Immunity board the ship during its passage. EXCEPTIONS:
It refers to a principle by which a state, its agents, and 1. if the consequences of the crime extend to the coastal
property are immune from the jurisdiction of another state State; ·
[MAGALLONA]. 2. if the crime is of a kind to disturb the peace of the
country or the good order of the territorial sea;
This principle is premised on the juridical equality of states, 3. if the assistance of the local authorities has been
according to which a state may not impose its authority or · requested by the master of the ship or by a diplomatic '.·. I,
1 ... •
in a proceeding which relates to the operation of that ship ownership used for the used excluslvely for the
if, at the time the c.ause of action arose, the ship was used purpose of the mission purposes of consular post.
for other than government . non- commercial purposes. including the residence
{Article 16, United Nations Convention on Jurisdictional of the head of mission.
Immunities of States and Their Property]
The consular premises, their
Immunity of warships from execution furnishings, the property of
A state's naval vessel may not be proceeded against to the consular post and its
answer for said state's financial liabilities to a third party. It means of transport shall be
stated that, "in accordance with general international law, immune from any form of
a warship enjoys immunity" and that "any act which requisition for purposes of
prevents by force a warship from discharging its mission national defense or public
and duties is a source of conflict that may endanger utility. If expropriation is
friendly relations among States." [Argentina v, Ghana necessary for such purposes,
(ITLOS, 2012)] all possible steps shall be
taken to avoid impeding the
performance of consular
BASIC PRINCIPLES OF DIPLOMATIC AND CONSULAR
functions, and prompt,
LAW
adequate and effective
compensation shall be paid to
Diplomatic And Consular Relations the senJing State.
I
DIPLOMATS CONSULS
The agents of the The agents of the receiving
Administrative and receiving State may not State may not enter the
Political relatlons of the premises except with the
economic issues of the enter the premises
state except with the consent consent of the head ·cif
state
of the head of the consular post.
mission.
Right of Legation
The consent may be
The right of a state to maintain diplomatic relations with
assumed in case of fire or
other states. other disaster requiring
prompt protective action
Types
1. Active - right to send diplomatic representatives. The diplomatic bag shall The consular bag shall not be
2. Passive - right to receiv~ diplomatic representatives, not be opened or opened or detained.
detained.
Diplomatic And Consular Immunities Authorities may request that
• Personal Inviolability the bag be opened in their
• Inviolability/Immunity of premises presence by an authorized
representative of the sending
f • • Right of protection
state if they have serious
• Immunity from local jurisdiction on the basis of reason to believe that the bag
r :
international custom contains objects other than
..~··-''
\: • Exemption from taxes and personal services articles, documents,
I' ·;.
• lnviolabil!ty of means of communication correspondence or articles.
•; y • Immunity from search of diplomatic bag
A diplomatic agent is not Members of the consular post
obliged to give evidence may be called upon to attend
DIPLOMATIC as a witness. as witnesses.
CONSULAR IMMUNlrf
IMMUNITY (Vienna
(Vienna Convention on
Convention on If a consular officer should
Consular Relations)
Diplomatic Relations) decline to do so, no coercive
measure or penalty may be
"Premises of the "Consular premises" - Include applied.
mission" - Include the the buildings or parts . of '1--~~~~~~~~-1--~~~~~~~~~--l
buildings or parts of buildings and the land A diplomatic agent shali Members of the consular post
buildings and the land irrespective of ownership enj~y immunity from the shall enjoy immunity from the
irrespective of
Page 291 of 320
ATENEO CENTRAL
BAR OPERATIONS 2019 POLITICAL LAW
Full Powers
There is no hard and fast rule on the propriety of entering,
The authority granted unto a representative of the state to
on a given subject, into a treaty or an executive agreement
enter into, negotiate, sign and seal a treaty. This shall be
as an instrument of ir,ternational relations. The primary
made by the President 01: the Secretary of the DFA, whel
consideration in the choice of the form of agreement is the
:,j I delegated. (E.O No. 459)
parties' intent and desire to craft an international
agreement in the 1orm they so wish to further their
respective interests. The matter of form takes a back seat Persons exempted from showing full powers
when it comes to effectiveness and binding effect of the 1. Secretary of the DFA
'.
",
\.
J
enforcement of a treaty or an executive agreement, as the 2. Heads of Philippine diplomatic missions (for the
parties in an international ag,eement each labor under purpose of adopting the text of a treaty or an
the pacta sunt servanda principle. (Bayan Muna v.. agreement between the Philippines and the State to
\'..;_, ,,/
Romulo, G.R. No. 159618, 2011). which they are accredited):
3. Representatives accredited by the Philippines to an
Power to Negotiate and Senate Concurrence international conference or to an international
In the realm oi treaty-making, the President has the sole organization er one of its organs, for the purpose of
authority to negotiate with other Slates. It follows that adopting the text of a treaty in that conference,
Congress, while possessing vest legislative powers, may organization or organ (EO No. 459)
not interfere in the field of treaty negotiations. While Article
VII, Section 21 provides for Senate concurrence, such Requisites for Validity
pertains only to the validity of the treaty under
1. Treaty making capacity, which is possessed by all
consideration, not to the conduct of negotiations attendant
states as an attribute of sovereignty. International
to its conclusion. Moreover, it is not even Congress as a
organizations also possess treaty- making capacity,
whole that has been giv1m the authority to concur as a
although limited by the organization's purpose;
means of checking the treaty-making power of the
·. ... 2. Competence of the representative/organ making the
treaty, which may be the head of state, which generally
Page 293 of 320
--- - -··~---------------------------------------1
ATENEO CENTRAL
BAR OPERATIONS 2019 POLITICAL LAW
has full powers, or other persons called its representative) (Article 12( 1 ), VCLOT);
plenipotentiaries, which must produce an instrument
showing authority to sign a treaty binding their Practice of Alternat
government; Arrangement under which each negotiator is allowed to
3. Consent freely givf3n by the parties. If consent was sign first on the copy of the treaty which he will bring
given erroneously, or was induced by fraud, the treaty . home to his own country, the purpose being to preserve
shall be voidable; the formal appearance of equality among the
4. Object and subject matter, which must be lawful; contracting states and to avoid delicate questions of
5. Ratification in accordance with the constiMional precedence among the signatories.
process of the parties concerned.
Effect of Signature with respect to Ratification
In addition to the constitutional requirement, Signature does not create an obligation to ratify.
ratification is necessary under international law when:
1. The treaty provides for consent to be expressed by Obligation not to Defeat the Object and Purpose of
means of ratification; a Treaty before its Entry Into Force
2. It is otherwise established that the negotiating states A State is obliged to refrain from acts which would
agreed that ratification should be required; defeat the object and purpose of a treaty when:
3. The representative of the state has signed the treaty 2. it has signed the treaty or has exchanged
subject to ratification [VCLT, art. 14(1 )], that Is, when
instruments constituting the treaty subject to
the intent was to make it subject to ratification.
ratification, acceptance or approval, until it shall
have made its intention clear not to become a party
Treaty-making process to the treaty; or
1. Negotiation. The state representative 1 discuss the 3. it has expressed its consent to be bound by the
terms and provisions of the treaty. treaty, pending the entry into force of the treaty and
2. Adoption. When the form and content have been provided that such entry into force is not unduly
settled by the negotiating states, the treaty is adopted. delayed. (VCLT, Art.18)
This is only preparatory to (1) the authentication of the 2. Ratification , the formal consent to the treaty given by
text of the treaty and (2) the signing thereof. [VCLT, the head of state, sometimes in conjunction with the
art. 9} legislature; ·
3. Authentication. A definitive text of the treaty is 1. Exchange of instruments constituting the treaty;
established as the correct and authentic one; 2. Acceptance;
4. Expression of consent. The state parties express 3. Approval;
their consent to be bound by the terms of the treaty. 4. Accession, the method by which a state, becomes
The modes of such expression are provided in the a party to a treaty of which it is not a signatory and
VCLT. in the negotiation of which it did not take part;
5. Registration. The treaty is then registered with the
Secretariat of the United 5 Nations. Otherwise, the l ....
Kinds of Accession
treaty may not be invoked before any UN organ [UN
Charter, art. 102(2)] including the ICJ. 1. Accession proper - non-signatory becomes a party to
all the provisions of the treaty
In the Philippines, the negotiation of treaties and their 2. Adhesion or Adherence: non-signatory becomes a
ratification are executive functions, subject to concurrence party in some o'i the provisions of the treaty
of the Senate.
Interpretation of Treaties
Consent to be bound by the terms of a treaty may be 1. Actuality - based on actual text
expressed through: 2. Natural and Ordinary meaning -, ,,/
1. Signature, when the negotiator is authorized to sign the 3. Integration - interpreted as a whole;
treaty. This signature is sufficient to bind the state under 4. Effectiveness - based on object and purpose
the treaty if: · 5. Subsequent Practice
.,......
a. The treaty provides that signature shall have that 6. Contemporaneity - interpreted in light of linguistic \:.._:i
effect; usage current at the time when the treaty was
b. It is otherwise established that the negotiating states concluded ,, r,
"\:,.,,:...
agreed that signature should have that effect; or
c. The state can be shown to have had the intention to be '
bound by the signature (e.g., based on the powers of
.
\.
,· ....,
~
! ·~
was notified to the other negotiating states prior to the pacta sunt servanda. A party to a treaty is not allowed to
representative expressing such consent; Invoke the provisions of Its internal law as justification for
its failure to perform a treaty. Nevertheless as far as the
7. If consent was given in violation of provisions of
Court is concerned, a treaty is always subject to
internal law regarding competence to conclude treaties
that is manifest and of fundamental importance. ~ualifi?3tion or amendment by a subsequent law, or that, it
rs subject to the police power of the State (Um v. Executive
(VCLT] .
Secretary, G.R. No. 151445, 2002).
Grounds for termination '
Rebus Sic Stantlbus
1. Expiration of the term, or withdrawal of a party in
accordance with the treaty; General Rule: A fundamental change of circumstances is
not a ground for a treaty to be suspended or terminated.
2. Extinction of a party to the treaty, when the treaty rights
and obligations would not devolve.upon the successor-
state; Exceptions:
3. Mutual agreement of parties; 1. The circumstance Is the essential basis of consent.
''~., .I 4.. Denunciation or. desistance by a party; 2. The obligation is transformed radically that It becomes
5. . Supervening impossibility of performance; burdensome or unreasonable.
Page 295 of 320
ATENEO CENTRAL
· POLITICAL LAW
BAR OPERATIONS 2019
...... ,
ATENEO CENTRAL
BAR OPERATIONS 2019 POLITICAL LAW
The propriety of governmental acts should be put to the 2. One who has committed a serious non-political crime
test of international standards. The treatment of an alien, outside the country of refuge prior to his admission to
in order to const'tute an international delinquency, should that country as a refugee.
amount to an outrage, to bad faith, to willful neglect of duty, 3. One who has been guilty ol acts contrary to the
or to an insufficiency of governmental action so far short of purposes and principles of the United Nations. (1951
international standards that every reasonable and impartial Convention Relating to the Status of Refugees, art 1).
man would readily recognize its insufficiency [Neer Case
(PCIJ, 1926)]. Rights of Refugees
Refugee law and lnternatlenal human rights law are closely
For the enforcement of this state responsibility, the intertwined; refugees are tleeing governments that are
following must be complied with: either unable or unwilling to protect their basic human
1. Exhaustion of local administrative remedies; rights. Additionally, in cases where the fear of persecution
2. Representation of the alien by his own state in the or threat to life or safety arises in the context of an armed
international claim for damages. conflict, refugee law. also intersects with international
humanitarian law.
Calvo Clause · 1. Non-Refoulment
2. Freedom of Movement
A stipulation which states that the foreign party must rely
3. Right to Liberty and Security of Person
exclusively on local remedies and not seek any diplomatic
4. Right to Family Life
protection.
5. Others (rights to education, access to justice,
employment, and other fundamental freedoms and
Rationale: privileges similarly enshrined in international and
1. Non-intervention; and regional human rights treaties.
2. aliens are entitled only to such rights as are accorded
nationals and thus had to seek redress for grievances Principle Of Non-Refoulement
exclusively in the dornestlc arena. [SHAW]
No Contracting State shall expel or return a refugee in any
manner whatsoever to the frontiers of territories where his
e.g. A stipulation may be made by virtue of which an alien life or freedom would be threatened on account of his race,
waives or restricts his right to appeal to his own state in religion, nationality, membership of a particular social
connection with any claim arising from a contract with a group or political opinion. (1951 Convention Relating to the
foreign state and limits himself to the remedies available Status of Refugees, art. 33). It does not distinguish
under the laws of that state. · between returning them to the State from which they might
have come or to one that will also maltreat them.
I. REFUGEES
Definition Internally Displaced Persons
·, . One who, owing to a well-founded fear of being persecuted
for reason of race, religion, nationality, membership oi a
People or groups of people who have been forced or
obliged to flee or to leave their homes of places of habitual
particular social group or political opinion, is outside the residence, in particular as a result of or in order lo avoid
country of his nationality, and is unable to, or owing to such the effects of armed conflict, situations of generalized
fear, is unwilling to avail himself of the protection of that violence, violations of human rights or natural or human-
country. (1951 Convention Relating to the Status of ' made disasters, and who have not crossed an
Refugees, art. 1) internationally recognized State border. (UN Guiding
t >
Principles on Internal Displacement, par. 2).
!
Governing Statute
r.'• n . The controlling international convention on refugee law is
the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of
Statelessness
Refugees (1951 Convention) and its 1967 Optional Statelessness is the condition or status of an individual
Protocol relating to the Status of Refugees who Is born without any nationallty or who loses his
nationality without retaining or acquiring another [CRUZ].
Some persons not covered by the 1951 Convention
Relating to the Status of Refugees . Under the Convention Relating to the Status of Stateless
--~· 1. 0ne who has committed a crime against peace, a war Persons ~1960), a stateless person is entitled to, among
others, the right to religion and religious instruction, access
crime, or a crime against humanity, as defined in the
to courts, elementary education, public relief and
'c.....,;' international instruments draw up to make provision in
respect of such crimes. . assistance and rationing of products in short supply, as
.[ . well as treatment of no less favorable than that accorded
<, ;
to aliens.
Stateless Persons . In a case decided by the Supreme Court, the Chief Justice
A person who is not considered as a national by any State pointed out that in 166 out of 189 countries surveyed (or
under the operation of its law. (1954 Convention Relating 87.83%), foundlings are recognized as citizens. These
to the Status of Stateless Persons, art 1). circumstances, including the practice of jus sanguinis
· countries, show that it is a generally accepted principle of
Types of Statelass Persons international law to presume foundlings as having been
born of nationals of the country in which the foundling is
1. De Jure Stateless Persons - Those who have lost
found. [Poe-Uamanzares v. COMELEC, G.R. No. 221697
their nationality if they had one, and have not acquired
a new one. '·
(2016))
2. De Facto Stateless Persons -Those who have a
nationality but to whom protection is denied by their
J. EXTRADITION
state when out of the state. This is the situation of
many refugees. Deflnltlon
a. The removal of an accused from the jurisdiction of a
Asylum Seeker Host State with the object of placing him at the disposal
A person who has left their country of origin and formally of foreign aulhcrities to enable the Requesting State or
applied for asylum in another country but whose government to hold him in connection with any criminal
application has not yet been concluded. investigation directed against him or the execution of a
penalty imposed on him under the penal or criminal law
Foundlings of the Requesting State or Government.
Definition b. Extradition means the surrender of a person by one
state to another state where he is wanted for
A child, whose parents are both unknown shall have the prosecution or, if already convicted, for punishment
nationality of the country of his or her birth' A foundling is
until the contrary is proved, presumed to have been bor~ Fundamental Principles
on the territory of the State in which he or she was found.
(F::~·Llamanzares v, COMELEC, G.R. No. 221697, 2016, General Rule: There can only be extradition if there is a
c,tmg 1961 Convention on the Reduction of Statelessness treaty between the States. Outside a treaty, there is no rule
art. 2; 1930 Hague Convention on Certair. Question; in inte,national law compelling a State to extradite anyone.
Relating ~o t~e Conflict of Nationa/J~, Laws, art. ·t4) This Such may be done, however, as a gesture of cornity.
presumption in favor of foundlings is a generally accepted Exception: Even with a treaty, crimes with political and
principle of international law. (Poe-Llamanzares v. religious cornplexlon are exempted.
COMELEC, G.R. No. 221697, 2016). Exception to the Exception: The assassination of a head
l .'.
of State or any member of his family is not regarded as '1 ·'
While the Philippines is not a party to the 1961 Convention political offense for purposes of extradition. This is also
on the Reduction of Statelessness (UNCRS) and the 1930 known as the attendant clause. It also applies for the crime
of genocide.
Hague Convention, it is a signatory to the Universal
Declaration on Human Rights (UDHR}. Article 2 of the
UNCRS and Article 14 of the Hague Convention merely Principle of Specialty
give effect to Article 15(1) of the UDHR. (Poe-Llamanzares As a general rule, a fugitive who is extradited may be tried
v. COMELEC, G.R. No. 221697! 2016). only for the crime specified in the request for extradition,
and such crime is included in the list of extraditable / j_
"-i- • ...,.-
Citizenship of Foundlings offenses in the treaty.
Foundlings are citizens under international law. Article 24
of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights Who may be Extradited
provides for the right of every child "to acquire a
nationality." The Philippines is obligated under various
Any person may be extradited, whether he be a national of
the requesting state, of the state of refuge or of another
' ·. .,-
c?nventions such as the ICCPR to grant nationality from state.
birth and ensure that no child is stateless. This grant of
Political and Religious Offenders Procedure For Extradition (Presldent/11/ Decree 1069)
Political and religious offenders are generally not subject 1. Foreign diplomat of the Requesting State or
to extradition, For the purpose of extradition, genocide and Government requests for extradition with Secretary of
murder of the head of state or any member of his family Foreign P.ffairs.
are not political offenses. 2. DFA forwards request to DOJ.
3. DOJ files petition for extradition with RTC.
Absence of Special Agreement 4. RTC issues summons or Wamint of Arrest to compel
In the absence of special agreement, the offense must the appearance of the individual.
have been committed within the territory or against the 5. Hearing (provide counsel de officio, if necessary).
interests of the demanding state 6. Appeal to CA within 10 days whose decision shall be
final and executory.
Aut dedere aut judicare 7. Decision forwarded to DFA through the DOJ.
(means 'either extradite or prosecute') is a conventional 8. Individual placed at the disposal of the authorities of
obligation of States found in various treaties. A state requesting State. Costs and expenses to be
subject to this obligation is bound to extradite if it does not shouldered by Requesting state.
prosecute, and prosecute if it does not extradite.
Distinguished from deportation
Principle of Double Criminality (a) Extradition is the "removal of an accused from the
According to this principle, a person may be extradited only Philippines with the object of placing him at the
when his/her actions constitute an offense In both the disposal of foreign authorities." (PD 1069, §2(a)). It is a
Requesting and Requested States. This principle is now form of international iudicial assistance designed to
commonly accepted by States and is embodied in deny criminals a safe haven abroad. It is a formal
extradition treaties. A party to an extradition treaty may ask procedure whereby a,, individual, accused or convicted
the ether party to extradite a person for a crime committed of a crime under the laws of one State, is arrested in
before the effectivity of a treaty. It does not violate the another State and handed over to the former State, at
prohibition against ex post facto laws. The constitutional that State's request, for trial or punishment. (Boczek,
prohibition applies to penal laws only. An extradition treaty The A to Z of /ntemational Law, 60, 2010).
is not a penal law. (Wright v. CA, G.R. No. 113213, 1994). (b) Deportation is the act or an instance of removing a
person to another country (Black's Law Dictionary,
Notice and Hearing 504, 2004). It is exercised by the President to expel or
A person does not have the right to notice and hearing deport aliens whose presence is deemed inimical to the
during the evaluation stage of ~he extradition process. public interest. Deportation is based on the fact that
Extradition is a proceeding sui generls. It is not a criminal since the aliens are not part of the nation, their
proceeding which will call into operation all the rights of an admission into the territory is a matter of pure
..: .
_:,
accused guaranteed by the Bill of Rights. The process of
extradition does not Involve the determination of the guilt
permission and simple tolerance which creates no
obligation on the part of the government to permit them
or innocence of an accused. There Is no deprivation of the to stay. (Djumantan v. Domingo, G.R. No. 99358,
right to due process. (Secretary of Justice v. Hon. Lant/on 1995).
and Mark Jimenez, G.R. No. 139465, 2000).
\. ; Extradition v De ortation
Right to Bail EXTRADITION DEPORTATION
An extraditee should not be deprived of his right to apply
for bail, provided that a certain standard for the grant is Effected at the request of Unilateral act of the State
satisfactorily met. The standard or proof required in another state
granting or denying bail in extradition cases is clear and
,; t Based on offenses Elased on causes arising in
•.:...:.' convincing evidence that the extraditee is not a flight risk
and will abide with the orders of the extradition court. committed in the state or the local state.
( Government of Hong Kong v. 0/alia,Jr., G.R. No. 153675, origin.
2007).
Calls for the return of the An undesirable alien may
fugitive to the requesting be deported to a state other
If bail can be granted in deportation· proceedings, there is
state than his own or the state of
t-._~' no justification not to allow it for extradition because both
are administrative proceedings where the innocence or
origin.
' . guilt of the parties is not in issue.
~ ._: However, aliens may be expelled or deported from the
I :
Philippines only on grounds and in the manner provided for
Page 301 of 320
-----~--------------- - . -· .
ATENEO CENTRAL
BAR OPERATIONS 2019 POLITICAL LAW
by the Constitution, the Philippine Immigration Act of ; 940, Despite this. the UDHR is considered a normative
as amended, and administrative issuances pursuant instrument that creates binding obligations for all states
thereto. (Sec. of Justice v. Koruga, G.R. No. 166199, ... because of the consensus evidenced by the practice of
2009). . . states that the UDHR is now binding as part of international
law [CARILLO) .
.K. INTERNATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS LAW
Rights Covered
PRELIMINARIES 1. Civil and political rights .
Definition of Human Rights 2. Economic, social, and cultural rights
Human rights are those fundamental and inalienable rights
which are essential for life as a human being. They pertain The UDHR embodies both first and second generation
to rights of an individual as a human being which are rights. The civil and political rights enumerated
recognized by the international community as a whole lncluds:
through their protection and promotion under 1. The right to life, liberty, privacy and security of person;
contemporary lntematlonal law. 2. · Prohibition against slavery; ·
3. The right not to be subjected to arbitrary arrest,
Classlflcatfon detention or exile;
1. First generation right5 consist of civil and political 4. The right to fair trial and presurnpton of innocence;
rights; 5. The right to a nationality;
2. Second generation rights consist of economic, social 6. The right to freedom of thought, conscience and
and cultural rights; religion;
3. Third generation rights consists of the ,rights to 7. The right to freedom of opinion and expression;
development, to peace, and to environment. [VasakJ 8. Right to peaceful assembly and association;
9. The right to take part in the government of his country.
FIRST GENERATION SECOND GENERATION The economic, social and cultural rights enumerated
include:
ObiigatoryForce
1. The right to social security;
Strictly (or objectively) Relatively obligatory, 2. The right to work and protection against
obligatory, whatever the unemployment;
states are required to
economic or other progressively achieve the 3. The right to equal pay for equal work; ·
conditions of the states full realization of these 4. The right to form and join trade unions:
obligated tights "to the maximum of 5. The right to rest and leisure.
th~ir available resources"
UDHR as Customary Internatlonal Law
Derogation/Restriciton · Rights covered by UDHR are customary international law;
May only be derogated in a May be restricted for the hence, even during the times when the Bill of Rights under
public emergency the Constitution are inoperative, rights under UDHR
general welfare. with or
remained in E3ffect (Republic v. Sandiganbayan, G.R. No. ~...
without an "emergency that
104768, 2003). .
threatens the
independence or security ''• .
of a state party." INTERNATIONAL COVENANT ON CIVIL · AND
POLITICAL f~IGHTS (ICCPR)
Overview
Universal Declaration of Human Rights
Overview The ICCPR ls an international covenant and is binding on i".,·.
the respective state parties. It ernbodies the first
The UDHR is the basic international statement of the generation of human rights, although it lists more rights .~. '.
inalienable and inviolable rights of human beings. It is the than the UDHR.
; . :-
first comprehensive international human rights instrument .. ,
!-
proclaimed by an irlternational organization. Rights Guaranteed \;.,,,....,'
-, ;"1
ATENEO CENTRAL
BAR OPERATIONS 2019 POLITICAL LAW
depends on what actually happens on the ground. It is Does not include interual situations such as riots,
based on factual conditions. [ICRC] Isolated and sporadic acts of violence
However, it c1oes r.ot include internal situations such as
Jus Ad Bel/um - use of armed force riots, isolated and sporadic acts of violence, other acts of
General Rule: Under Article 2(4) of the UN Charter, all similar nature. (Additional Protocol II to the Geneva
Member States are bound to refrain from the threat or use Conventions of 1949).
of force against the territorial integrity or political
independence of a State. Additional Protocol II requires control over territory. For this
Exception: Self-defense reason, the Philippine-NDF conflict is not governed by AP
II but by the Common Article 3 to the Geneva Convention
Anticipatory Self Defense of 1949, which requires only minimum humanitarian
Article 51 of the UN Charter recognizes the inherent right protection.
of States to self-defense if an armed attack occurs.
Collective Self-Defense Common Article 3
Before a State can be justified in assisting another by way ' The main legal sources in this regard are the Common
of collective self -defense: Article 3, Geneva Conventions, and Artide 1, Additional
1. The second State must be a victim of an armed Protocol 11.
attack
2. The second State must request from the first State Common Article 3 applies to "armed conflicts not of an
military assistance international character occurring in the territory of one of
the High Contracting Parties." These include armed
Self Defense v. Just War conflicts in which one or more non-governmental armed
groups are involved.
SELF-DEFENSE JUST WAR THEORY
Applicability of Com:non Article 3
Permits only the use of Once a state has a valid
force to put an end to an reason for resorting to Article 1 develops Common Article 3. It applies to:
armed attack and to any force, there is no limit on 1. All armed conflicts which take place in the territory of a
occupation of territory or the extent of force which state party;
other forcible violation of could be employed. 2. Between its armed forces and dissident armed forces
rights which may have or other organized groups;
been committed. 3. Which, under responsible command, exercise such
control over a part of its territory;
Armed attacks include not only action by regular armed 4. As to enable to carry out sustained and concerted
forces across an international border but also sending by military operations and to implement the Protocol.
or on behalf of the State of armed groups, bands, irregulars
or mercenaries. IHL also establishes a distinction between non-
intemational armed conflicts in the meaning of Common
Authorized Military Actions By The UN or Competent Article 3, Geneva Conventions of 1949 and non-
Regional Organizations (Such As NATO) intemational armed conflicts falling within the definition
provided in Article 1, Additional Protocol II.
----~----~----------------------------------- - -·
ATENEO CENTRAL
BAR OPERATIONS 2019
POLITICAL LAW
means that the restrictive definition is relevant for the · thus contribute to the prevention of such crimes, it
application of Protocol II only, but dces not extend to the being the duty of every State to exercise its criminal
law of non-internauonal armed conflict in general. Jurisdiction over those responsible for international
crimes
In any case, while Common Article 3 is recognized as a
customary norm of international law and binding to all Definition of Terms
states, Additional Protocol II is a treaty binding only to state Apartheid
parties. Its rules may, however, develop onto customary Inhumane acts committed in the context of an
norms (ICRC). institutionalized regime of systematic oppression and
domination by one racial group or groups and committed
C. War of National Liberation with the intention of maintaining that regime
Armed conflicts in which people are fighting against
colonial domination and alien occupation and against racist Armed conflict
regimes in the exercise of their right of self-determination,
Any use of force or armed violence:
Those engaged in such c1 conflict receive combatant status
and are entitled to combatant rights and duties. This a. between States or
conflict is considered an international armed conflict under b. a protracted armed violence between governmental
Article 1, 3rd and 4th pars., Protocol 1. (AdditionalProtocol authorities and organized armed groups; or ·
I to the Geneva Conventions of 1949). c. between such groups within that State:
Provided, That such force or armed violence gives rise, or
Wars by peoples against racist, colonial and alien may give rise, to a situation to which the Geneva
domination "for the implementation of their right to self- Conventions of 12 August 1949, including their common
deterrnination and independence is legitimate and in full Article 3, apply.
accord with principles of international law," and that any
attempt to suppress such struggle is unlawful (Resoiution i. Armed conflict may be international, that is, between
3103 (XXVIII)). two (2) or more States, including belligerent
occupation; or
When peoples subjected to alien domination resort to ii. Non-international, that is, between governmental
forcible action in order to exercise their right to self- authorities and organized armed gmups or between
determination, they "are entitled to seek and to receive such groups within a state. It does not cover internal
support in accordance with the purposes and principles of disturbances or tensions such as riots, isolated and
the Charter." [UN GA Reso. 2625 (XXV)) sporadic acts of violence or other acts of a similar
nature.
PHILIPPINE PRACTICE: . R.A. 9851 (PHILIPPINE ACT
ON CRIMES AGAINST INTERNATIONAL Enslavement
HUMANITARIAN LAW, GENOCIDE, AND the exercise of any or all of the powers attaching to the
OTHER CRIMES AGAINST HUMANffY) right of ownership over a person and includes the exercise
of such power in the course of trafficking in persons, in
RA 9851 was enacted on December 11, 2009. It 1::. the particular women and children.
Philippine act on crimes against international humanitarian ''· .
.;
law, genocide, and other crimes against humanity. Its .,_ Extermination
policies are: . means the international infliction of conditions of life, inter
1. The Philippines renounces war as an instrument of alia, the deprivation of access to food and medicine,
national policy, adopts the generally accepted calculated to bring about the destruction of a· part of a
principles of International law as a part of the law of the population.
land.
2. The state adopts the generally accepted principles of Hors de Combat
international law, including the Hague Conventions of
A person who:
1907, the Geneva Conventions on the protection of
victims of war and international humanitarian law, as ( 1) is in the power of an adverse party;
part of the law our nation. (2) has clearly expressed an intention to surrender; or
(3) has been rendered unconscious or otherwise
3. The most serious crimes of concern to the intematior.al ·
community as a whole must not go unpunished and incapacitated by wounds or sickness and therefore is
incapable of defending hlmself: Provided, that in any of
. ...,
/
d
....... _.,,
.,
considered a stateless person or refugee under the (3) Taking of hostages; and
relevant international instruments accepted by the ( 4) The passing of sentences and the carrying out of
parties to the conflict concerned or under the national executions without previous judgment pronounced by
legislation of the state of refuge or state of residence; a regularly constituted court, affording all judicial
(5) a member of the medical personnel assigned guarantees which are generally recognized as
exclusively to medical purposes or to the indispensable.
j •
1,,_,.,
administration of medical units or to the operation of or
administration of medical transports; or
Page 307 of 320
• ... #
ATENEO CENTRAL
BAR OPERATIONS 2019 POLITICAL LAW
23. In an international armed conflict, declarinq abolished, 3. With knowledge of the attack
suspended or inadmissible in a court of law the rights 4. Any of the following acts: .
and actions of the nationals of the hostile party; a. Willful killing;
24. Committing any of the following acts: b. Extermination;
a. Conscripting, enlisting or recruiting children under c. Enslavement;
the age of fifteen ( 15) years into the national armed d. Arbitrary deportation or forcible transfer of
forces; · population;
b. Conscripting, enlisting or recruiting children under e. Imprisonment or other severe deprivation of
the age of eighleen (18) years into an armed force physical liberty in violation of fundamental
or group other than the national armed forces; and rules of International law;
c. Using children under the age of eighteen (18) f. Torture;
years to participate actively in hostilities; and g. Rape. sexual slavery, enforced prostitution,
25. Employing means of warfare which are prohibited forced pregnancy, enforced sterilization, or
under international law, such as: any other form of sexual violence of
a. Poison or poisoned weapons; comparable gravity;
b. Asphyxlating, poisonous or other gases, and all h. Persecution against any Identifiable group or
analogous liquids, materials or devices; collectivity on political, racial, national, ethnic,
c. Bullets which expand or flatten easily in the human cultural, religious, gender, sexual orientation or
body, such as bullets with hard envelopes which other grounds that are universally recognized
do not entirely cover the core or are pierced with as impermissible under international law, in
incisions; and 'connecuon with any act referred to in this
d. Weapons, projectiles and material and methods of paragraph or any crime defined in this Act;
warfare which are of the nature to cause i. Enforced or involuntary disappearance of
superfluous injury or unnecessary suffering or persons;
which are inherently indiscriminate in violation of j. Apartheid; and
the international law of armed conflict. k. Other inhumane acts of a similar character
intentionally causing grea~suffering, or serious
Genocide injury to body or to mental or physical health.
Any of the following acts with intent to destroy, in whole
or in part, a national, ethnic, religious, social, or any Persecution
other similar stable and permanent group International and severe deprivation of fundamental rights
1. Killing members of the group; · contrary to international law by reason of identity of the
2. Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of group or collectivity
the group;
.~ :-
3. Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life Enforced or Involuntary Disappearance
calculated to bring about Its physical destruction in The arrest, detention, or abduction of persons authorized
whole or in part; by the State or political organization fellowed by a refusal
4. Imposing measures intended to prevent births within to acknowledge that deprivation of freedom or to give
the group; and · information on the fate or whereabouts of those persons,
5. Forcibly transferring children of the group to another , with the intention of removing from the protection of the law
group. for a prolonged period of time.
Also unlawful to directly and publicly incite others to Prlnclples of Criminal Liability
commit genocide. Individual Criminal Responsibility
I. Liable as principal
Forced Pregnancy a. Commits such a crime, whether as an individual,
Unlawful confinement of women to be forcibly made jointly with or through another regardless of
pregnant, with the intent of affecting the ethnic composition whether that other person is liable
,... ~· of any population carrying out other grave violations of b. Orders, solicits or induces the commission of such
International law. a crime which occurs or is attempted
c. In any other way contributes to the commission or
Other Crimes Against Humanity attempted commission by persons in conspiracy:
1. Committed as part of a widespread/systematic i. With the aim of furthering the criminal activity
attack or criminal purpose of the group
2. Directed against any civilian population
ii. Be made in the knowledge of the intention of CORE INTERNATIONAL OBLIGATIONS OF STATES
the group to commit the crime. IN INTERNATIONAL HUMANITARIAN LAW
2. Llable as accomplice
Facilitates the commission of a crime; aids, abets or Common Article 1 of all four Geneva Conventions is a key
otherwise assists in its commission or attempted provision when it comes to a state's responsibilities under
commission, including providing the means for its IHL. It provides that states are responsible to "respect and
commission ensure respect" for the conventions in all circumstances.
3. Liable for a crime punished under this act
Attempts to commit such a crime by taking action that In general, IHL defines the following obligations:
commences its execution by means of a substantial 1. Parties to an armed conflict, together with their armed
step, but the crime does not occur because of forces, do not have unlimited choice of methods or
circumstances independent of the person's intention means of warfare. They are prohibited from employing
4. No llablllty · weapons or means of warfare that cause unnecessary
A person who abandons the effort to commit the crime damage or excessive suffering.
or prevents the completion. if completely and voluntarily -, 2. Parties to an armed conflict shall, at all times,
gave up the criminal purpose. distingubh between civilian population and the
combatants (prindple of distinction). Civilians shall be
Irrelevance of Official Capacity spared frcm military attacks which shall be directed
The provisions of the act shall apply equally to all persons only against military objectives.
without any distinction based on official capacity. However 3. Persons hors de combat are those who have been
the following shall be considered: injured in the course of hostile battle. action and are no
1. Immunities or special procedural rules that may be longer able to directly take part in hostilities. They shall
attached to the official capacity of a person under be protected and treated humanely without any
P~ilippine law other than the President's immunity from adverse distinction. Their right to life and physical and
moral integrity shall be respected.
suit, shall not bar the court from exercising jurisdiction
over such a person 4. It is prohibited to kill or injure an enemy who is hors de
2. Immunities that may be attached to the official capacity combat or who surrenders.
of a person under international law may limit the 5. The wounded and the sick shall be protected and
application of this Act cared for by the party to the conflict which has them in
its power. Protection shall also apply to medical
persor.nel, establishments, transports and material.
Jurisdiction
6. Combatants and civilian who are captured by authority
of the party to a dispute are entitled to respect for their
Requisites to acquire jurisdiction
right to life, dignity, conviction, and other personal
1. The accused is a Filipino citizen rights. They shall be protected against acts of violence
2. The accused regardless of citizenship or residence, is or reprisals. [Legality of the Threat or Use of Nuclear
present in the Philippines Weapons Advisory Opinion (1990)]
3. The accused has committed the said crime against a
Filipino citizen The ICCPR, particularly its protection on the right to life,
does not determine the legality of the use of nuclear
Foreign Accused weapons in an armed conflict. What applies is the lex
1. The Philippine authorities may dispense with the specialis, which is the IHL. It determines whether the taking
invesligation or prosecution of a crime under this act if of life in times of war has been arbitrary. .
another court or international tribunal is already
conducting such proceedings. In this case, the International Humanitarian Law covers two areas:
authorities may surrender or extradite the accused 1. the protection of those who are not, or no longer, taking
persons to the appropriate ~tate or Court. . part in the fighting; and
2. No criminal proceedings shall be initiated against 2. resfrictions on the means ot' wariare, in particular, ...
f~reign nationals accused of violating this act, if already t{
weapons and methods of warfare, such as military
tned by a court outside the Philippines with tile same tactics.
offense and acquitted of it, or convicted and has
already served sentence.
Obligations are found primarily in the four Geneva
Conventions of 1949 and the Additional Protocols I and II
;
\',
.
.,,
... ; ....
thereto. Other sources include:
!
• 1954 Convention for the Protection of Cultural Property '·'
in the Event of Armed Conflict, and its two protocols;
Page 310 of 320
ATENEO CENTRAL
BAR OPERATIONS 2019 POLITICAL LAW
Requirement for Humanitarian Intervention Combatants are not entitled to the rights afforded to
1. There are grave and massive human rights violations civilians.
2. The other state is incapable or unwilling to meet the
redress Prisoners of War (POW)
3. There is no other practical alternative than to intervene Prisoners of war are captured for security reasons and not
4. The action should be limited in time and scope. for punishment.
General Rule: A prisoner of war shall not be liable to
.... ,__ Hors de combat judicial prosecution even If he has committed to facilitate
escape (e.g., theft, drawing of false papers).
Under Article 41(2), Protocol 1, a person is hors de combat
if: Exception: When the escapee has used violence against
1. He is in the power of an adverse party to the conflict; life arid limb during his escape.
2. He clearly expresses an intention to surrender; or
Persons belonging to one of the following categories:
3. He has been rendered unconscious or is otherwise
incapacitated by wounds or sickness, and is therefore 1. Members of the armed forces of a party to the conflict,
<,»
incapable ot defending himself, provided that in any of including militias or volunteer corps;
these cases, he abstains from any hostile act and does 2. Militias or volunteer corps operating in or outside their
not attempt to escape. own territory, even if such territory is occupied
provided:
'~.J . Persons hors de combat shall be protected and treated
f •
humanely without any adverse distinction. Their right to liff3 ·. 3. They are being commanded by a person responsible
' ·, and physical and moral integrity shall be respected. for his subordinates;
II '
-.. I 4. Have a fixed distinctive sign recognizable at a
distance;
Page 311 of 320
ATENEO CENTRAL
BAR OPERATIONS 2019 POLITICAL LAW
Martens clause/principle of humanity of war and supplies across the territory of a neutral
power.
I~ ?!ises not covered by other international agreements, 3. A neutral power is forbidden to allow belligerents to
c1V1hans and combatants remain under the protection and use its territory for moving troops, establishing
.suthority of the principles of international law derived from
communication facilities, or forming corps of
established custom, from the principles of humanity and combatants.
from the dictates of public conscience.
4. Troops of belligerent armies received by a neutral Suppression of the Financing of Terrorism (1999) is as
power in its territory shall be interned by away from the -, follows:
theatre of war.
5. The neutral power may supply them with food, clothing An act done by any person intended to cause (a) death or
or relief required by humanity. serious bodily injury to any person, or (b) serious damage
6. If the neutral power receives escaped prisoners of war, to a State or Government facility with intent to cause
it shall leave them at liberty. It may assign them a place extensive destruction of such a place, facility or system, or
of residence if it allows them to remain in its territory. where such destruction results or is likely to result in major
7. The neutral power may authorize the passage into its economic loss, when the purpose of such an act is to
territory of the sick and wounded if the means of intimidate a populatior. or to compel a Government or an
transport bringing them does not carry personnel or international organization to do or abstain from doing any
materials of war. act.
The Geneva Convention (Ill) allows neutral powers lo
cooperate with the parties to the armed conflict in making Criminal acts intended or calculated to provoke a state of
arrangements for the accommodation in the forrner's terror in the general public, .:. group of persons or particular
territory of the sick and wounded prisoners of war. persons for political purposes are in any circumstance
unjustifiable, whatever the considerations of a political,
Interned persons among the civilian population, in philosophical, ideological, racial, ethnic, religious or any
particular the children, the pregnant women, the mothers other nature that may be invoked to justify them. ( UN
with infants and young children, wounded and sick, may be General Assembly Resolution 51/210, 1996).
accommodated in a neutral state in the course of
hostiiities, by agreement between the parties to the Criminal acts, including against civilians, committed with
conflict. · the intent tu cause death or serious bodily injury, or taking
of hostages, with the purpose to provoke a state of terror
Protecting power in the general public or In a group of persons or particular
A protecting power is a state or an organization: persons, intimidate a population or compel a government
or an international organization to do or to abstain from
1. Not taking part in the hostilities;
doing any act, which constitute offenses within the scope
2. Which may be a neutral state; of and as defined in the international conventions and
3. Designated by one party to an armed conflict with the protocols relating to terrorism, are under no circumstances
consent of the other; ju~tifiable by considerations of a political, philosophical,
· 4. To safeguard or protect its humanitarian interests in ideological, racial, ethnic, religious or other similar nature
the conflict, the performance of which IHL defines (UN Security Council Resolution 1566, 2004).
specific rights and duties.
Right to unilateral s1~cession or external self-
Responsibility To Protect determination under International Law?
The State carries the primary responsibility for protecting General Rule: The people's right to self-determination
populations from genocide, war crimes, crimes against should not be understood as extending to a unilateral right
humanity and ethnic cleansing, and their incitement; of secession.
·.. ;; Exception: International law, at best, only recognizes the
The international community has a responsibility to right to external self-determination in situations of {1)
l . encourage and assist States in fulfilling this responsibility; former colonies; (2) whore a people is oppressed, as for
\...,.) example under foreign military occupation; or (3) where a
The international community has a responsibility to use definable group is denied meaningful access to
appropriate diplomatic, humanitarian and other means to government to pursue their political, economic, social and
protect populations from these . crimes. If a State is cultural development (Province of North Cotabato v. GRP.
manifestly failing to protect its populations, the G.R. No. 183591, 2008).
international community must be prepared to take
·......
collective action to protect popuiations, in accordance with M. LAW OF THE SEA
the Charter of the United Nations (UN General Assembly
Resolution 60/1, 2005).
Overvi~w
International Terrorism The United Nations Convention on Law of the Sea
(UNCLOS) is the body of treaty rules and customary norms
In international law, it is difficult to criminalize terrorism
governing the use of the sea, the exploitation of its
because of the difficulty in defining the prohibited act. The
resources, and the exercise of jurisdiction over maritime
draft definition at the lnt13rnational Convention for the
regimes (Magallona).
Page 313 of 320
ATENEO CENTRAL
BAR OPERATIONS 2019 POLITICAL LAW
Straight lines are made to connect appropriate poir,·.s on Transit passage refers to the right to exercise freedom of \.:_ 7
the coast without departing radically from its general navigation and over flight solely for the purpose of
direction. The waters inside the lines are considered . continuous and expeditious transit through the straights
internal. This is the method used by the Philippines in · used for international navigation. The right cannot be
drawing baselines. unilaterally suspended by the coastal state.
' ,
Page 314 of 320 '.. .,,
ATENEO CENTRAL
BAR OPERATIONS 2019 POLITICAL LAW
Jurisdiction over Contiguous Zone If after determining the maximum allowable catch, the
coastal state does not have the capacity to harvest the
In the contiguous zone, the coastal State may exercise the
entire catch, it shall give other states access to the surplus
control necessary to: .
by means of arrangements allowable under the UNCLOS.
• Prevent infringement of its customs, fiscal,
The UNLCOS, however, does not specify the method for
immigration, or sanitary raws and regulations within its
determining "allowable catch."
territory or territorial sea;
• Punish infringement of the above laws and regulat!ons
Within its EEZ, a coastal state may also:
committed within its territory or territorial sea.
1. Establish and use of artificial islands, installations and r
structures;
EXCLUSIVE ECONOMIC ZONE
2. Conduct scientific research; (
Definition 1, .
3. Preserve and protect its marine environment.
An Area extending not more than 200 nautical miles ·~ 4. However. under Article 58, UNCLOS, all states enjoy I .
beyond the baseline. The coastal State has rights over the the freedom of navigation, over flight, and laying of ,:,,a;.
economic resources of the sea, seabed and subsoil, but submarine cables and pipelines in the EEZ of coastal
the right does not affect the right of navigation and states.
overflight of other States. ( UNCLOS, art. 55).
The coastal state has the right to enforce all laws and
Jurisdiction over EEZ regulations enacted to conserve and manage the living
The UNCLOS gives the coastal State sovereign rights over · . resources in its EEZ. It may board and inspect a ship,
all economic resources of the sea, seabed and subsoil in arrest a ship and its crew and institute judicial proceedings
an area extending not more than 200 nautical miles against them. In detention of foreign vessels. the coastal t '
beyond the baseline from which the territorial sea is state has the duty to promptly notif°'J the flag state of the
'<::
measured (Arts. 55 and 57, UNCLOS). action taken.
Undar the UNCLOS, states have the sovereign right to Conflicts regarding the attdbution of rights and jurisdiction
exploit the resources of this zone, but shall share that part in the EEZ must be resolved on lhe basis of equity and in
of the catch that is beyond its capacity to harvest. the light of all relevant circumstances, taking into account
Page 316 of 320 .,,w•'
ATENEO CENTRAL
BAR OPERATIONS 2019 POLITICAL LAW
the respective importance of the interests involved to the When the continental shelf extends beyond 200 nautical
parties as well as to the international community as a miles, the coastal state shall establish its outer limits.
whole (Article 59, UNCLOS).
At any rate, the continental shelf shall not extend beyond
Geographically Disadvantaged States 350 nautical miles from the baseline of the territorial sea,
Geographically disadvantaged states (i.e., those who have or 100 nautical miles from the 2500-meter isobath (i.e., the
no EEZ of their own or those coastal states whose point where the waters are 2500 meters deep).
geographical situations make them dependent on the
exploitation of the living resources of the EEZ of other Rights of the Coastal State
states) and land-locked states have the right to participate, The continental shelf does not form part of the territory of
on equitable basis, in the exploitation of the surplus of the the coastal state.
living resources in the EEZ of coastal states of the same
sub region or region. It only has sovereign right~ with respect to the exploration
A coastal state whose economy is overwhelmingly and exp!oitation of its natural resources, including the
dependent on the exploitation of its EEZ, however, ls not mineral and other non-living resources of the seabed and
required to share its resources. subsoil together with living organisms belonging to the
sedentary species.
CONTINENTAL SHELF
Definition The coastal state has the exclusive right to authorize and
'
Also known as the archipeJagicor insular shelf which refers regu!ate oil--drillihg on its continental shelf.
to:
1. The seabed and subsoil of the submarine areas These rights are exclusive in the sense that when the
adjacent to the coastal State but outside the . coastal state does not explore its continental shelf or
territorial sea, to a depth of 200 meters, or beyond exploit ;ts resources, no one may undertake these activities
that limit, to where the depth allows exploitation, without the coastal state's consent.
and
2. The seabed and subsoil of areas adjacent to
islands. (UNCLOS, art. 76). ' CONTINENTAL SHELF EXCLUSIVE ECONOMIC
ZONE
Extended Ccntinental Shelf Duty to manage and conserve living resources
It is part of the Continental Shelf that lies beyond the 200.
nautical miles from the coastal baselines. It is the seabed No duty Coastal state is obliged to
and subsoil of the submarine areas extending beyond the manage and conserve living
territorial sea of the coastal state throughout the natural resources in the EEZ
prolongation of its lands territory up to: Rights of the coastal state to natural resources
1. The outer edge of the continental margin; or
2. A distance of 200 nautical miles from the baselines of Relate to mineral and Have to do with natural
the territorial sea where the outer edge of the other non-living resources of both waters
continental margin does not extend. up to that distance. resources of the seabed super adjacent to the
and the subsoil seabed and those of the
~ontinental margin.
the submerged prolongation of the land mass of the
I seabed and subsoil
Allowable Acts in the High Seas in the Area. It organizes, carries out and controls the
1. Freedom of navigation activities of the Area on behalf of mankind as a whole.
2. Freedom of overflight
3. Freedom cf scientific research Composition
4. Freedom to construct artificial islands and structures The following form the Authority:
5. Freedom of fishing 1. The Assembly - all state parties to the UNCLOS
6. Freedom to lay submarine cables and pipelines 2. The Council - the executive organ whose 36 members
(UNCLOS, art. 87). are elected by the Assembly
3. The Enterprise - the organ directly ·engaged in the
China's "nine-dash linfl" and its claim to resources based exploration and exploitation of the resources of the
on historic right is incompatible with the detailed allocation Area, including the transporting,· processing and
of rights and maritime zones under the UNCLOS. Even if marketing of minerals
China had historic rights to resources in the waters of the
South China Sea, such rights were extinguished by the Activities In the Area
entry into force of the Convention to the extent they were
The Enterprise carries out mining activities on behalf of the
incompatible with the Convention's system of maritime
Authority:
zones. Further, China's historical navigation and fishing in
the waters of the South China sea represents the exercise
1. Directly; or
of high seas freedom, not the exercise of historic right. 2. By joint ventures with: a. State parties; b. State
(The South China Sea Arbitration, 2013-19, July 12, 2016) enterprises; or c. Natural or juridical persons
sponsored by state parties.
Bays Applicants for license in deep seabed mining are limited to
those controlled by states parties to the UNCLOS or by
Well-marked indentation whose penetration is in such
their nationals.
proportion to the width of its mouth as to contain
landlocked arees and constitute more than a mere
curvature of the coast. An indentation shall not be reg.:.rded INTERNATIONAL TRIBUNAL FOR
as a bay unless its area is as large as, or larger than, that JHE LAW OF THE SEA {ITLOS)
of the semi-circle whose diameter is a line drawn across
the rnouth of that indentation. (UNCLOS, art. 10(2)) ' Definition
The International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea is an
THE AREA independent judicial body to adjudicate disputes arising out
Definition of the interpretation and application of the UNCLOS. It is
"Area" means the seabed and ocean floor and subsoil the proper venue to resolve the issue on the Baselines
thereof, beyond the limits of national jurisdiction. Law.
i .
Legal Status of the Area and Its Resources Jurisdiction of the ITLOS
No State shall claim or exercise sovereignty or sovereign Its jurisdiction comprises all disputes and all applications rc....,'.
submitted to it in accordance with the Convention. It also
rights over any part of the Area or its resources, nor shall
any State or natural or juridical person appropriate any part includes all matters specifically provided for in any other .
. '
thereof. [Article 137, UNCLOSJ agreement which confers Jurisdiction on the Tribunal
(UNCLOS, Art. 21). It has jurisdiction to deal with disputes
(contentious jurisdiction) and legal questions (advisory t ........ ;
The Area and its resources are the common heritage of
jurisdiction) submitted to it.
mankind. {Article 136, UNCLOSJ Activities in the Area shall
be carried out for the benefit of mankind as a whole. [Article
140, UNCLOS] The ·Tribunal, however cannot exercise jurisdiction over
certain types of disputes such as disputes over sovereignty
over the islands of South China Sea and the delimitation of
The Area shall be open to use exclusively for peaceful
maritime boundary. (The South China Sea Arbitration,
purposes by all States. [Article 141, UNCLOS)
2013-19, July 12, 2016)
r -.
INTERNATIONAL SEABED AUTHORITY \., .....i
Certain preconditions must be present before the Tribunal
can exercise jurisdiction. This includes a dispute
Definition settlement mechanism entered into by State Parties and
\" ·\
,...;,,·
It is the organization established by UNCLOS which acts an exchange of views between the State Parties on the
on behalf of mankind in governing the regime of resources mear.s of settling their dispute. This requirement was met
in the record of diplomatic communications between
..~-· ,
Page 318 of 320
ATENEO CENTRAL
BAR OPERATIONS 2019 POLITICAL LAW
Philippines and China. (The South China Sea Arbitration, Precautionary Principle
2013-19, July 12, 2016) · In order to protect the environment, the precautionary
approach shall be widely applied by States according to
Both the Philippines and China are parties to the their capabilities. Where there arc threats of serious or
Convention and bound by its provisions on the settlement irreversible damage, lack offull scientific certainty shall not
of disputes. China's decision not to participate does not be used as a reason for postponing cost-effective
deprive the Tribunal of jurisdiction and Philippines' measures to prevent environmental degradation (Principle
decision to commence arbitration unilaterally was not an 15, Rio Declaration). ·
abuse of the Convention's dispute settlement procedures.
(The South China Sea Arbitration, 2013-19, July 12, 2016) Factors to be Considered
a. Threatening to human life of health or
Peaceful Settlement of Disputes b. Inequity to present or future generations
Under Article 2, 3rd par., UN Charter, states have the duty c. Prejudice to the environment without legal
to settle disputes by peaceful means. This obligation consideration of the environmental rights of those
extends to state parties of the UNCLOS, underscoring the affected
right of the parties to resort to peaceful means of their own
choice on which they can agree any time. For purposes of evidence, the precautionary principle
should be treated as a principle of last resort, where
Compulsory Settlement of Disputes application of the regular Rules of Evidence would cause
Where no successful settlement can be achieved, or if the in an inequitable result for the environmental plaintiff.
parties are unable to agree on the means of settlement of (International Service for the Acquisitio."'I of Agri-Biotech
a dispute concerning the application of UMCLOS, such Applications v.' Greenpeace, G.R. No. 209271, 2015)
dispute may be governed by the principle of compulsory
settlement, where procedures entail binding decisions. The case for the precautionary principle is strongest when
the following features coincide:
The parties may choose, through a written revocable and 1. Settings in which the risks of harm are uncertain;
replaceable declaration, to submit the dispute to: 2. Settings in which harm might be irreversible and what
1. ITLOS; is lost is irreplaceable; and
2. ICJ; 3. Settings in which the harm that might result would be
3. Arbitral tribunal; serious. (International Service for the Acquisfflon of
4. Special arbitral tribunal Agri-Biotech Applications v. Greenpeace, G.R. No.
209271, 2015)
The court or tribunal has jurisdiction over:
1. Any dispute submitted to it concerning the application When in doubt, cases must be resolved in f;JVC\r of the
i : or interpretation of UNCLOS; or constitutional right to a balanced and healthful ecology.
~ J, Parenthetically, judicial adjudication is one of the strongest
2. Any dispute concerning the interpretation or
fora ir. which the precautionary i:;rinciple may find
applicafion of an international agreement:
applicability. (International Service for the Acquisition of
a. Related to the purposes of the UNCLOS;
Agri-Biotech Applications v. Greenpeace, G.R. No.
b. When such dispute is submifted to it in
'·, s , 209271, 2015)
accordance w'th that agreement.
N. BASIC PRINCIPLES OF The precautionary principle only applies when the link
between the cause, that is the human aotlvity sought to be
INTERNATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL LAW
inhibited, and the effect, that is the damage to the
environmer,t, cannot be established with full scientific
Overview certainty. (West Tower Condomimium v. First Philippine
--~.v
It is the branch of public international law comprising those Industrial Corporation, G.R. No. 194239, 2015)
substantive, procedural, and institutional rules which have
as their primary objective the protection of the OTHER CONCEPTS COVERED BY INT'L
environment, the term environment being understood as ENVIRONMENTAL LAW
encompassing "both the features and the products of the
natural world and those of human civilization" (Sands,
·, Principle of Common but Differentiated Responsibility
c~· Principles of International Environmental Law).
States shall cooperate in a spirit of global partnership to
conserve, protect and restore the health and integrity of the
earth's ecosystem. In view of the different contributions to
ATENEO CENTRAL
BAR OPF.RATIONS 2019 POLITICAL LAW
Overview
!ntemational Economic law is international law rslatinq to
rnvestment, economic relations, economic development,
economic institutions, and regional economic integration t,"~ '
•I
(Black's Law Dictionary, 2004). . '· .
i '
1
Most Favoured Nation Clause
Under the WTO agreements, countries cannot normally
discriminate between their trading partners or grant one
State party a special favour (such as a lower customs duty 4' ~ :
~- I
rate for one of their products) witr,out extending the same
to all other WTO members.
1-
---------------···- ··- ---