Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Anti-Sexual Harassment Act To Provisions On Minors
Anti-Sexual Harassment Act To Provisions On Minors
03
Women Night Workers
04
Employment of Minors
(R.A. No. 10151) • Provisions on Minors under the
• Star Paper Corp. v Simbol Labor Code
• Domingo v Rayala
• Duncan Association v Glaxo
• Philippine Telegraph &
Telephone Co. v NLRC
What is Sexual Harassment?
It is not about a man taking
advantage of a woman by reason
of sexual desire – it is about power
being exercised by a superior
officer over his women
Act of demanding or requesting subordinates.
sexual favor, by a person having
authority or moral ascendancy
over another, regardless of It is not necessary that the
whether demand or request is demand, request or requirement
accepted or not for sexual favor be articulated in a
categorcal oral or witten
statement. It is enough that the
respondent’s acts result in
creating an intimidating, hostile or
01 Anti-Sexual Harassment Act (R.A. No. 7877) offensive environment for the
employee.
Where can sexual harassment be committed?
i. ii.
In a work-related In an education or
environment training environment
i. ii.
Work-related environment
(a) (b)
(c) (d)
Any person who has authority, influence, or Any person who directs, induces, or
moral ascendancy over another in a work or cooperates with another to commit any act
training or education environment of sexual harassment
The committee on decorum and investigation shall be composed of at least one (1)
representative from:
(a) Management
(b) Rank and file employees (a) The administration
(c) Supervisory employees (b) Trainors, teachers,
(d) Union, if any. instructors, professors or
coaches
(c) Student or trainees
02 Safe Spaces Act (R.A. No. 11313) recreational spaces such as, but not limited
to, cinema halls, theaters and spas
What does it include?
• misogynistic,
transphobic, homophobic and
Designate at least
Include the anti-sexual one (1) anti-sexual Deploy security guards in these places to
(4) harassment hotline harassment (6) apprehend perpetrators caught
number in bold letters (5) officer to receive in flagrante delicto and are required to
gender-based immediately coordinate with local
sexual authorities.
harassment
complaints.
NOTE:
The Land Transportation Where the perpetrator is the driver
of the vehicle shall also constitute a
Franchising and
breach of contract of carriage, for
Regulatory Board (LTFRB) the purpose of creating a
may suspend or revoke presumption of negligence on the
The Land Transportation Office the franchise of part of the owner or operator of
(LTO) may cancel the license of transportation operators . the vehicle in the selection and
perpetrators. supervision of employees and
rendering the owner or operator
solidarity liable for the offenses of
the employee.
oExemption:
• authorized written orders of the court for any peace officer to use online
records or any copy thereof as evidence in any civil, criminal investigation or
trial of the crime
02 Safe Spaces Act (R.A. No. 11313)
What are qualified gender-based streets, public spaces and online sexual harassment?
a) If the act takes place in a common carrier or PUV, including, but not
limited to, jeepneys, taxis, tricycles, or app-based transport network
vehicle services, where the perpetrator is the driver of the vehicle
and the offended party is a passenger;
b) If the offended party is a minor, a senior citizen, or a person with
disability (PWD), or a breastfeeding mother nursing her child;
c) If the offended party is diagnosed with a mental problem tending to The penalty next
impair consent; higher in degree will
d) If the perpetrator is a member of the uniformed services, such as be applied in the
the PNP and the Armed Forces of the Philippines (AFP), and the act following cases:
was perpetrated while the perpetrator was in uniform; and
e) If the act takes place in the premises of a government agency
offering frontline services to the public and the perpetrator is a
government employee.
(a)
An act or series of acts involving any unwelcome sexual advances, requests or demand (b)
for sexual favors or any act of sexual nature, whether done verbally, physically or
through the use of technology such as text messaging or electronic mail or through any
A conduct of sexual nature and other conduct-based on sex affecting the
other forms of information and communication systems, that has or could have a
dignity of a person, which is unwelcome, unreasonable, and offensive to
detrimental effect on the conditions of an individual’s employment or education, job
the recipient, whether done verbally, physically or through the use of
performance or opportunities;
technology such as text messaging or electronic mail or through any other
forms of information and communication systems;
(c) (d)
A conduct that is unwelcome and pervasive and creates an intimidating, hostile or Information and communication system refers to a system for generating,
humiliating environment for the recipient: Provided, That the crime of gender- sending, receiving, storing or otherwise processing electronic data messages
based sexual harassment may also be committed between peers and those or electronic documents and includes the computer system or other similar
committed to a superior officer by a subordinate, or to a teacher by a student, or devices by or in which data are recorded or stored and any procedure related
to a trainer by a trainee; and to the recording or storage of electronic data messages or electronic
documents.
01 02
Provide measures to prevent gender-based sexual
Disseminate or post in a conspicuous place a copy of this harassment in the workplace, such as the conduct of anti-
Act to all persons in the workplace. sexual harassment seminars;
04
sexual harassment which shall:
Provide and disseminate, in consultation
1) Adequately represent the management, the employees from the with all persons in the workplace, a code of
supervisory rank, the rank-and-file employees, and the union, if any;
conduct or workplace policy which shall:
2) Designate a woman as its head and not less than half of its members
should be women;
3) Be composed of members who should be impartial and not connected or
related to the alleged perpetrator; 1) Expressly reiterate the prohibition on
4) Investigate and decide on the complaints within ten (10) days or less upon gender-based sexual harassment;
receipt thereof; 2) Describe the procedures of the
5) Observe due process;
internal mechanism created under
6) Protect the complainant from retaliation; and
7) Guarantee confidentiality to the greatest extent possible; Section 17(c) of this Act; and
3) Set administrative penalties.
b)
in the penal provisions; or
Not taking action on • It is a yearly spontaneous
a) acts
Refrain from committing reported acts of gender-
based sexual harassment
inspections to ensure
compliance of employers and
of gender-based sexual
committed in the employees with their
b)gander-based
harassment;
Discourage the conduct of workplace. obligations under this Act.
sexual
c) support
harassment in the workplace;
Provide emotional or social
a) The Department of Labor and
Employment (DOLE) - for the private
to fellow employees, sector
co-workers, colleagues or
peers who are victims of
gender-based sexual
b) The Civil Service Commission (CSC) - for
the public sector
d) harassment; and
Report acts of gender-based
sexual harassment witnessed
in the workplace.
b) Provide measures to prevent gender-based sexual harassment in educational institutions, like information campaigns;
c) Create an independent internal mechanism or a CODI to investigate and address complaints of gender-based sexual harassment which
shall:
i. Adequately represent the school administration, the trainers, instructors, professors or coaches and students or trainees, students
and parents, as the case may be;
ii. Designate a woman as its head and not less than half of its members should be women;
iii. Ensure equal representation of persons of diverse sexual orientation, identity and/or expression, in the CODI as far as practicable;
iv. Be composed of members who should be impartial and not connected or related to the alleged perpetrator;
v. Investigate and decide on complaints within ten (10) days or less upon receipt, thereof;
vi. Observe due process;
vii. Protect the complainant from retaliation; and
viii. Guarantee confidentiality to the greatest extent possible.
d) Provide and disseminate, in consultation with all persons in the educational institution, a code of conduct or school policy which shall:
i. Expressly reiterate the prohibition on gender-based sexual harassment;
ii. Prescribe the procedures of the internal mechanism created under this Act; and
iii. Set administrative penalties.
a) Non-implementation of
based sexual harassment shall • conduct regular spontaneous
only be held liable for inspections to ensure compliance of
their duties under Section administrative sanctions by the school heads with their obligations
22 of this Act, as provided school as stated in their school under this Act.
in the penal provisions; or handbook.
Discourage the conduct of
gander-based sexual a) The Department of Education (DepEd)
harassment
workplace;
in the
b)The Commission on Higher Education (CHED),
b) Failure to act on reported
and
acts of gender-based
sexual harassment c) The Technical Education and Skills
committed in the Development Authority (TESDA)
educational institution.
Pregnant women and nursing mothers may be allowed to work at night only if a competent
physician, other than the company physician, shall certify their fitness to render night work, and
specify, in the case of pregnant employees, the period of the pregnancy that they can safely
work.
The measures referred to in this article may include transfer to day work where this is possible,
the provision of social security benefits or an extension of maternity leave.
03 Women Night Workers (R.A. No. 10151) The provisions of this article shall not leave the effect of reducing the protection and benefits
connected with maternity leave under existing laws.
Night Work
Compensation. Schedules
§ The compensation for night • Before introducing work
workers in the form of
working time, pay or similar
Social Services schedules requiring the
services of night workers,
benefits shall recognize the § Appropriate social services the employer shall consult
exceptional nature of night shall be provided for night the workers'
work. workers and, where representatives/labor
necessary, for workers organizations concerned on
performing night work. the details of such schedules
and the forms of organization
of night work that are best
adapted to the establishment
and its personnel, as well as
on the occupational health
measures and social services
which are required. In
establishments employing
night workers, consultation
shall take place regularly.
Simbol was employed by the company and met a co-employee and they eventually had a relationship and got married.
Prior to the marriage, the manager advise the couple that should they decide to get married, one of them should resign pursuant
to a company policy: ISSUE:
1. new applicant will not be allowed to be hired if he/she has a relative, up to 3rd degree of consanguinity, already employed by
the company. Whether or not the policy of the
2. if the two employees got married, one of them should resign to preserve the policy stated first. employer banning spouse from
working in the same company, a
Simbol resigned. valid exercise of management p
F: rerogative.
RULING:
No, it is not a valid exercise of management prerogative and violates the rights of employees under the constitution. The case at bar involves Article 136 of the
Labor Code which provides “it shall be unlawful for an employer to require as a condition of employment or continuation of employment that a woman employee s
hall not get married, or to stipulate expressly or tacitly that upon getting married, a woman employee shall be deemed resigned or separated , or to actually dismiss
, discharge , discriminate or otherwise prejudice a woman employee merely by reason of her marriage.”
The company policy of Star Paper, to be upheld, must clearly establish the requirement of reasonableness. In the case at bar, there was no reasonable busines
s necessity. Petitioners failed to show how the marriage of Simbol, then a Sheeting Machine Operator, to Alma Dayrit, then an employee of the Repacking Secti
on, could be detrimental to its business operations. The questioned policy may not facially violate Article 136 of the Labor Code but it creates a disproportionat
e effect and under the disparate impact theory, the only way it could pass judicial scrutiny is a showing that it is reasonable despite the discriminatory, albeit d
isproportionate, effect. Lastly, the absence of a statute expressly prohibiting marital discrimination in our jurisdiction cannot benefit the petitioners.
Domingo v Rayala, February 20, 2008
FACTS: RULING:
Ma. Lourdes T. Domingo The law penalizing sexual harassment in our jurisdiction. Section 3 of RA 7877 defines work-related sexual harassment in
(Domingo), then Stenographic this wise:
Reporter III at the NLRC, filed a
Complaint for sexual harassment Sec. 3. Work, Education or Training-related Sexual Harassment Defined. – Work, education or training-related sexual
against Rayala, the chairman of harassment is committed by an employer, manager, supervisor, agent of the employer, teacher, instructor, professor, coach,
NLRC. trainor, or any other person who, having authority, influence or moral ascendancy over another in a work or training or
She alleged that Rayala called her education environment, demands, requests or otherwise requires any sexual favor from the other, regardless of whether the
in his office and touched her demand, request or requirement for submission is accepted by the object of said Act.
shoulder, part of her neck then a) In a work-related or employment environment, sexual harassment is committed when:
tickled her ears. Rayala argued 1) The sexual favor is made as a condition in the hiring or in the employment, re-employment or continued employment of
that his acts does not constitute said individual, or in granting said individual favorable compensation, terms, conditions, promotions, or privileges; or the
sexual harassment because for it refusal to grant the sexual favor results in limiting, segregating or classifying the employee which in a way would
to exist, there must be a demand, discriminate, deprive or diminish employment opportunities or otherwise adversely affect said employee;
request or requirement of sexual 2) The above acts would impair the employee’s rights or privileges under existing labor laws; or
favor. The above acts would result in an intimidating, hostile, or offensive environment for the employee.
Even if we were to test Rayala’s acts strictly by the standards set in Section 3, RA 7877, he would still be administratively
liable. It is true that this provision calls for a “demand, request or requirement of a sexual favor.” But it is not necessary that
ISSUE: the demand, request or requirement of a sexual favor be articulated in a categorical oral or written statement. It may be
discerned, with equal certitude, from the acts of the offender. Holding and squeezing Domingo’s shoulders, running his
Whether or not Rayala commit fingers across her neck and tickling her ear, having inappropriate conversations with her, giving her money allegedly for
sexual harassment. school expenses with a promise of future privileges, and making statements with unmistakable sexual overtones – all these
acts of Rayala resound with deafening clarity the unspoken request for a sexual favor.
Duncan Association v Glaxo, September 17, 2004
ISSUE:
Whether or Not Glaxo’s policy against its
FACTS: employees marrying employees from
competitor companies is valid, and in not
Petitioner Pedro Tecson was hired on Oct. 25, 1995 by respondent Glaxo Wellcome Philippines, Inc. holding that said policy violates the equal
as a medical representative. He was assigned to market Glaxo's products in the Camarines Sur- protection clause of the Constitution.
Camarines Norte sales area. Upon his employment, Tecson signed an employment contract,
wherein he agreed, among others, to study and abide by existing company rules; to disclose to
management any existing or future relationship by consanguinity or affinity with co-employees or
employees of competing drug companies; and if management found that such relationship posed a
possible conflict of interest, to resign from the company.
RULING:
On September, 1998 Tecson married Bettsy, an employee of a rival pharmaceutical firm Astra Yes. The record shows that Tecson was cognizant about the policy imposed by Glaxo
Pharmaceuticals as the branch coordinator. The relationship, including the subsequent marriage, company,uponsigningthecontract,hevoluntarilysethishandstofollowthesaidpolicies.
dismayed Glaxo. On January 1999, Tecson's superiors informed him that his marriage to Bettsy had Albeit employees are free to cultivate relationships with and marry persons of their own
given rise to a conflict of interest. Negotiations ensued, with Tecson adverting to his wife's possible choosing. What the company merely seeks to avoid is a conflict of interest between the
resignation from Astra, and Glaxo making it known that they preferred to retain his services owing employee and the company that may arise out of such relationships. After Tecson
to his good performance. Yet no resolution came to pass. In September 1999, Tecson applied for a married Bettsy, Glaxo gave him time to resolve the conflict . Glaxo even
transfer to Glaxo's milk division, but his application was denied in view of Glaxo's "least-movement- expressed its desire to retain Tecson in its employ because of his
possible" policy. Then in November 1999, Glaxo transferred Tecson to the Butuan City-Surigao City- satisfactory performance and suggested that his wife would be the one
Agusan del Sur sales area. Tecson asked Glaxo to reconsider its decision, but his request was to resign instead. Glaxo likewise acceded to his repeated requests for
denied. Tecson sought Glaxo’s reconsideration regarding his transfer and brought the matter to more time to resolve the conflict of interest. When the problem could not
Glaxo’s Grievance Committee. Glaxo, however, remained firm in its decision and gave Tescon until be resolved after several years of waiting, Glaxo was constrained to
February 7, 2000 to comply with the transfer order. Tecson defied the transfer order and continued reassign Tecson to a sales area different from that handled by his wife
acting as medical representative in the Camarines Sur-Camarines Norte sales area. for Astra. Notably, the Court did not terminate Tecson from employment
but only reassigned him to another area where his home province,
On Nov. 15, 2000, the Nat’l. Conciliation and Mediation Board ruled that Glaxo’s policy was Agusan del Sur, was included. In effecting Tecson’s transfer, Glaxo even
valid. Glaxo's policy on relationships between its employees and persons employed with competitor considered the welfare of Tecson’s family. Clearly, the foregoing dispels
companies and affirming Glaxo's right to transfer Tecson to another sales territory. any suspicion of unfairness and bad faith on the part of Glaxo.
Philippine Telegraph & Telephone Co. v NLRC (272 SCRA 596)
RULING:
FACTS:
Petitioner’s policy of not accepting or considering as disqualified from work any woman worker who
Petitioner Philippine Telegraph and contracts marriage runs afoul of the test of, and the right against, discrimination, afforded all women
Telephone Company (hereafter, PT&T) ISSUE:
workers by our labor laws and by no less than the Constitution.
invokes the alleged concealment of civil
status and defalcation of company WON the policy of “ART. 136. Stipulation against marriage. – It shall be unlawful for an employer to require as a condition of
funds as grounds to terminate the not accepting or employment or continuation of employment that a woman shall not get married, or to stipulate expressly or
services of an employee. That
considering as tacitly that upon getting married, a woman employee shall be deemed resigned or separated, or to actually
employee, herein private respondent dismiss, discharge, discriminate or otherwise prejudice a woman employee merely by reason of marriage.”
Grace de Guzman, contrarily argues that disqualified from
what motivated PT&T to terminate her work any woman In the case at bar, it can easily be seen from the memorandum sent to private respondent by the branch
services was her having contracted worker who supervisor of the company, with the reminder, that “you’re fully aware that the company is not accepting
marriage during her employment, which contracts marriage married women employee (sic), as it was verbally instructed to you.” Again, in the termination notice sent to
is prohibited by petitioner in its her by the same branch supervisor, private respondent was made to understand that her severance from
company policies. She thus claims that
is valid
the service was not only by reason of her concealment of her married status but, over and on top of that,
she was discriminated against in gross was her violation of the company’s policy against marriage (“and even told you that married women
violation of law, such a proscription by employees are not applicable [sic] or accepted in our company.”
an employer being outlawed by Article
136 of the Labor Code. Petitioner’s policy is not only in derogation of the provisions of Article 136 of the Labor Code on the right of a
woman to be free from any kind of stipulation against marriage in connection with her employment, but it
likewise assaults good morals and public policy, tending as it does to deprive a woman of the freedom to
choose her status, a privilege that by all accounts inheres in the individual as an intangible and inalienable
right. Hence, while it is true that the parties to a contract may establish any agreements, terms, and
conditions that they may deem convenient, the same should not be contrary to law, morals, good customs,
public order, or public policy. Carried to its logical consequences, it may even be said that petitioner’s policy
against legitimate marital bonds would encourage illicit or common-law relations and subvert the
sacrament of marriage.
Employment of Minors
Art. 137. MINIMUM EMPLOYABLE AGE. -
a) No child below fifteen (15) years of age shall be employed,
except when he works directly under the sole responsibility of
his parents or guardian, and his employment does not in any
way interfere with his schooling.
b) Any person between fifteen (15) and eighteen (18) years of age
may be employed for such number of hours and such periods
of the day as determined by the Secretary of Labor in
appropriate regulations.
c) The foregoing provisions shall in no case allow the
employment of a person below eighteen (18) years of age in an
undertaking which is hazardous or deleterious in nature as
determined by the Secretary of Labor
Art. 138. PROHIBITION AGAINST CHILD DISCRIMINATION. – No
employer shall discriminate against any person in respect of
terms and conditions of employment on account of his age.