Professional Documents
Culture Documents
T1 Practice Exercise Tipo parcialIII
T1 Practice Exercise Tipo parcialIII
Practice Exercise
The Figure shows a stage of a water treatment plant. Here, the 𝑝𝐻 of water (acid solution) must be
neutralized. The 𝑝𝐻 of the inlet water stream is usually under 7. Before this water can be poured into a
nearby lake, the 𝑝𝐻 value must be returned to 7. A maximum 𝑝𝐻 deviation of ±0.2 is accepted due to
environmental regulations. The setpoint to the 𝑝𝐻 controller is set at 7 for safety concerns.
Buffer
Acid Solution
Base Solution
F.O.
AC
pH set point
AT
The implemented control loop manipulates the flow of a base solution (with a density approximately
equal to that of water) stream to maintain 𝑝𝐻. The sensor/transmitter has a range from 0 to 14. The
pressure drop across the F.O. control valve is 1.5 𝑝𝑠𝑖, and it can be considered as constant. In normal
operating conditions, the controller signal bias is 𝑚
̅ = 52 %𝐶𝑂, causing the valve to give 36 𝑔𝑝𝑚 of the
base solution, and maintaining 𝑝𝐻 at 7. When a signal 𝑚 = 73 %𝐶𝑂 is sent to the valve, the flow drops
to 18.312 𝑔𝑝𝑚.
Controller action:
If the 𝑝𝐻 transmitter signal increases above the setpoint (7), this means the pH has become more basic
than the desired value. Thus, the basic solution flow should be decreased. To do that, the controller should
increase the signal sent to the F.O. control valve.
Buffer
Acid Solution
Base Solution
F.O.
AC
pH set point
AT
Valve characteristics:
There are two possibilities: i) the valve is linear, or ii) the valve is equal-percentage (E.P.). Let us explore
both cases.
i) Linear valve
If the F.O. valve were linear,
𝑚
𝐶𝑣 = 𝐶𝑣𝑚𝑎𝑥 (1 − )
100
∆𝑃
Multiplying both sides of the above equation by √ 𝐺 𝑣:
𝑓
∆𝑃𝑣 ∆𝑃𝑣 𝑚
√ 𝐶𝑣 = √ 𝐶𝑣𝑚𝑎𝑥 (1 − )
𝐺𝑓 𝐺𝑓 100
Knowing the ∆𝑃𝑣 remains constant, the above equation becomes:
𝑚
𝑓 = 𝑓𝑚𝑎𝑥 (1 − ) (1)
100
52
36 𝑔𝑝𝑚 = 𝑓𝑚𝑎𝑥 (1 − ) → 𝑓𝑚𝑎𝑥 = 75 𝑔𝑝𝑚 (2)
100
73
18.312 𝑔𝑝𝑚 = 𝑓𝑚𝑎𝑥 (1 − ) → 𝑓𝑚𝑎𝑥 = 67.82 𝑔𝑝𝑚 (3)
100
If, when solving equations (2) and (3), we had obtained the same value for 𝑓𝑚𝑎𝑥 , we could
have concluded that the valve was linear. Since that is not the case, the valve should be E.P.
This scenario will be evaluated in case ii).
∆𝑃
Multiplying both sides of the above equation by √ 𝐺 𝑣, and keeping in mind that ∆𝑃𝑣 is
𝑓
constant:
𝑚
𝑓 = 𝑓𝑚𝑎𝑥 𝛼 −100 (4)
Evaluating the two known operating points into equation (4) yields the following equations:
𝐺𝑓 1 𝑔𝑝𝑚
𝐶𝑣̅ = 𝑓 ̅√ = (36 𝑔𝑝𝑚)√ = 29.4
∆𝑃𝑣 1.5 𝑝𝑠𝑖 √𝑝𝑠𝑖
𝐺𝑓 1 𝑔𝑝𝑚
𝐶𝑣𝑚𝑎𝑥 = 𝑓𝑚𝑎𝑥 √ = (191.97 𝑔𝑝𝑚)√ = 156.74
∆𝑃𝑣 1.5 𝑝𝑠𝑖 √𝑝𝑠𝑖
Minimum controller gain not to exceed the maximum permitted offset for a certain condition:
𝑚=𝑚
̅ + 𝑘𝑐 𝑒
Then:
𝑚−𝑚̅
𝑘𝑐 =
𝑒
Then, the minimum gain (magnitude) not to exceed a maximum permitted error at a given operating
condition is:
𝑚−𝑚 ̅
𝑘𝑐𝑚𝑖𝑛 = (7)
𝑒𝑚𝑎𝑥
The operating point we ate interested in is that when 18.312 𝑔𝑝𝑚. We know that this flow takes place
when 𝑚 = 73 %𝐶𝑂. Then:
73 %𝐶𝑂 − 52 %𝐶𝑂
𝑘𝑐𝑚𝑖𝑛 = (8)
±1.43 %𝑇𝑂
We know, a priori, that 𝑘𝑐 < 0, because we have a direct-action controller. Therefore, we must use the
negative sign for the error, so that 𝑘𝑐𝑚𝑖𝑛 < 0. Finally, we find: