Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Current Situation & Challenges in Ee S&L Policy Dev in Indo PDF
Current Situation & Challenges in Ee S&L Policy Dev in Indo PDF
Sudirman Palaloi
Energy Technology Center,
Agency for the Assessment and Application of Technology
Symposium
OUTLINE
• Policy & regulation
• International cooperation
• Current situation of the energy efficiency
labeling program
• Challengers in energy efficiency S & L policy
Development In Indonesia
2
IEEJ: March 2012 All Right Reserved
Energy Conservation Policy and Regulation
2011
CONTENT
1 2 3 4 5
RESPONSIBLE OF CENTRAL
IMPLEMENTATION ON STANDARD & FACILITATION, GUIDANCE AND
GOV’T, LOCAL GOV’T, PRIVATES, SUPERVISION
ENERGY CONSERVATION LABEL INCENTIVE & DISINCENTIVE
AND COMMUNITY
International Cooperation of the Energy Conservation
Program
Program Description
International Bilateral Indonesia-Netherland (NL Agency) :
Cooperation Energy efficiency improvement in industrial sector through implementation of Energy
Potential Scan (EPS)
Bilateral Indonesia-Japan (JICA) :
Study on tariff mechanism and load management at peak load
Labeling for energy equipment (AC, refrigerator and TV)
Funding mechanism for energy efficiency
Methodology and emission factor baseline for energy efficient equipment
International Copper Association (ICA)
Preparing Minimum Energy Performance Standards (MEPS) for Electric Motor and Air-
Conditioning
UNDP - BRESL
Energy Efficiency Labeling for 7 appliances
UNIDO
Promoting Energy Efficiency in the Industries through System Optimization and
Energy Management Standards
IEEJ: March 2012 All Right Reserved
LOGO
EE level
Product model
Registration No.
IEEJ: March 2012 All Right Reserved
Print of
Manufacturer name
Power consumption
Efficacy
7
IEEJ: March 2012 All Right Reserved
Target Products for Labeling
1. Compact Fluorescent Lamp
2. Refrigerator
4. Television
5. Electronic Ballast
6. Electric Fans
7. Rice Cooker
8. Motor
9. Washing machine
IEEJ: March 2012 All Right Reserved
Product Standardization Policy and
Regulation Authority
REGULATION AUTHORITY
STANDARDIZATION DISTRIBUTION
MINISTRY OF
TRADE
MINISTRY OF
INDUSTRY
EE S&L Policy Enforcement
IEEJ: March 2012 All Right Reserved
Road Map of EE Labeling Program (1)
Rice cooker
CFLs and Ballast
Road Map of EE Labeling Program (2)
Products 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
Labeling Criteria
CFL
Voluntary Mandatory program
Testing procedure
Refrigerat Labeling Criteria
or
Road Map of EE Labeling Program (3)
Testing procedure
Rice Labeling Criteria
Cooker
Voluntary Mandatory program
Testing procedure
Ballast Labeling Criteria
Testing procedure
Fan Labeling Criteria
N/A
Rice cooker SNI IEC 60335-1:2009 UNDER CONSIDERATION UNDER CONSIDERATION
Under
Refrigerator consideration
N/A Yes (M) N/A
Under
AC consideration
N/A Yes (M) N/A
Fan
N/A N/A Yes (M) N/A
M : Mandatory
15
IEEJ: March 2012 All Right Reserved
LS Pro & Testing Laboratory
IEEJ: March 2012 All Right Reserved
LS Pro & Testing Laboratory on ESL Program
Proposed
Accredited Testing Processing Time
Producer/Importer Accredited LS‐Pro
Laboratory (Depend on
Product)
No
Had Product Perform
tested by 14‐30 days
Accredited Lab Testing
Yes
Revision/ No
Testing Result 2 days
Verification Testing Result
Correction
Yes
Issue Product
Product Certificate 1 day
certification
IEEJ: March 2012 All Right Reserved
ity
rm
Test report o
onf
Sample c to
of ed
at
n t
io mit Retailers
ar ub
cl s
De
Manufacturer
& Importer
Market Surveillance
Market
Consumers 18
IEEJ: March 2012 All Right Reserved
Sample
Certificate Retailers
Manufacturer
& Importer
Market
Consumers 19
IEEJ: March 2012 All Right Reserved
Availabel Testing Lab
IEEJ: March 2012 All Right Reserved
Refrigerator
6 1
AC 3 1
TV 3 N/A
Ballast 10
Fan 1 N/A
Rice cooker 3 N/A
Motor Pump N/A N/A
Inverter
Inverter
Star rating Non Inverter (weighted Star rating Non Inverter
(weighted COP)
COP)
3.34 < rated COP
Not given 3.05 ≤ COP 3.76 ≤ weighted COP
Not given and
3.76 < weighted COP
3.06 < rated COP 3.34 ≤ weighted COP<
3.20 < rated COP 3.34 < rated COP and 2.92≤COP< 3.05
3.79
3.34 < weighted COP
2.92 ≤ weighted COP<
2.64≤COP< 2.92
2.78< rated COP 2.92< rated COP 2.92 < weighted COP 3.34
2.64 ≤ weighted COP<
2.50 < rated COP 2.64< rated COP 2.64 < weighted COP 2.50≤COP< 2.64 2.92
Note : Rated COP = COP at full load cooling capacity Note : Rated COP = COP at full load cooling capacity
Weighted COP = 0.4*rated COP + 0.6 * half load COP Weighted COP = 0.4*rated COP + 0.6 * half load COP
Half load COP is the COP at 50% cooling capacity Half load COP is the COP at 50% cooling capacity
IEEJ: March 2012 All Right Reserved
Technical Aspects
• Need acceletarate accreditation of the testing laboratories and labeling sertification body
• Some household appliances do not have a performance national standard
• Most of the household appliances do not have energy efficiency rating
• Lack of accredited testing laboratory
• Limiter number of people having sufficient testing capabilities
Thank You
TERIMA KASIH
28
contact:report@tky.ieej.or.jp