Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 19

Industry report I December 2019

MSCI ESG Research LLC

INDUSTRY REPORT | BEVERAGES Rating momentum


Beverages constituents of the MSCI ACWI Index as of December 3, 2019
December 2019 CCEP
AAA
TCCC
• Beverages producers that concentrate their bottling or manufacturing operations in water stressed
AA AMBEV
regions face heightened risks of operational disruptions (e.g. plant shut-down due to conflicting
Heineken
water usage with local communities). Among the 35 beverages constituents of the MSCI ACWI Index A
A

(as of December 3, 2019) that have facility data available from the MSCI Climate Risk Center, 11 of FEMSA
BBB
them have 40% or more of their facilities concentrated in regions with high or extremely-high water Campari

stress, such as AB InBev, Constellation Brands, and Arca Continental (see Exhibit 2). BB
Kweichow
• As major economies, such as the EU and China prepare to roll out Extended Producer Responsibility B Moutai
(EPR) schemes, beverages producers may face heavier financial obligations towards municipals’ CCC
waste services, starting in 2022 (EU) and 2025 (China). Producers such as CCEP, Carlsberg, Coca-
Cola HBC, that generate more than half of their total revenues from the EU, also face increasing costs 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019
of redesigning plastic bottles to meet regulatory requirements (e.g. bottle with attached lid). See
“Plastics in a Circular Economy”, MSCI ESG Research LLC, 2019 Issuer communication

• Beverages companies are highly controlled by corporate parents and families (vs. MSCI ACWI Beverages constituents of the MSCI ACWI Index
Index)– 22 out of 46 are controlled by corporate parents, among which 7 are ultimately controlled by
46%
families; another 10 of the 46 are ultimately owned by the State (pg 4). 41%

% of companies with
inquiries/feedback
33%
Exhibit 1: Estimated percentage of plastic within packaging mix 28%
24%

TCCC
Coca-Cola Amatil
2015 2016 2017 2018 2019
CCEP
PepsiCo Number of beverages constituents of the MSCI ACWI Index = 46
Carlsberg
Report content Related reports
Pernod Ricard Key issues modelling Plastics in a Circular Economy
Key issues snapshot Food products
Diageo
Corporate Governance
Product Carbon Footprint
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70%
Water Stress
Packaging Material & Waste
Distillers & Vintners Brewers Soft Drinks Health & Safety
Product Safety & Quality
Appendices and scores

Source: Company Disclosure (2018), MSCI ESG Research LLC Author


Siyu Liu | Associate
© 2019 MSCI Inc. All rights reserved. Please refer to the disclaimer at the end of this document.
MSCI.COM | PAGE 1 OF 19
Industry report I December 2019
MSCI ESG Research LLC

Key issues modelling

Corporate Governance Water Stress Product Carbon Footprint Packaging Material & Waste
WEIGHT: 23% WEIGHT: 22% WEIGHT: 11% WEIGHT: 11%

Corporate Governance is a default key Agriculture is responsible for +70% of Beverages producers sell goods with Beverages producers rely on plastic as a
issue for all companies. global water withdrawal and +90% of high upstream carbon footprint. key packaging material, which can create
water consumption (source: OECD, Although carbon pricing has not had a a significant environmental burden when
IPCC). This could impact the availability major impact on the industry, many mismanaged as waste. Regulatory and
and price of agricultural raw materials countries are integrating agriculture in NGO scrutiny could result in clean-up
(e.g. barley, wheat, sugarcane, grape) their low carbon transitions and liabilities, restricted access to market;
and thus companies’ COGS. consumers’ awareness grows. increasing consumer awareness could
result in loss of revenue.

RISK EXPOSURE INDICATORS


• Carbon intensity of the business • Dependence on raw materials with
• We do not measure exposure on • Water input of the business lines,
lines, revenue-weighted high environmental impact
this key issue asset-weighted
• Purchasing volume of raw materials
• Operations located in high water
with high environmental impact
stress areas, asset-weighted

RISK MANAGEMENT INDICATORS


• Measurement of product life cycle • Reduction and/or reuse/recycle
• Board • Water optimization program in own
carbon footprint target across value chain
• Pay operation, risk assessment
• Measurement of suppliers’ • Programs to reduce, reuse or recycle
• Ownership and Control • Programs with local communities
emissions raw material used
• Accounting • Water reduction program with
agricultural suppliers • Reduction target across value chain
• Water efficiency performance • Programs to reduce energy use,
pesticides use and methane
• Reduction target across value chain
emissions

© 2019 MSCI Inc. All rights reserved. Please refer to the disclaimer at the end of this document.
MSCI.COM | PAGE 2 OF 19
Industry report I December 2019
MSCI ESG Research LLC

Product Safety and Quality* Opportunities in Health/Nutrition** Health & Safety


WEIGHT: 22% WEIGHT: 22% WEIGHT: 11%

Beverages producers are mainly assessed on Soft drinks are generally rich in sugar, and if According to Occupational Safety and Health
their marketing, advertising & sales practices consumed in large quantities, can be Administration (OSHA) and Reporting of Injuries,
under this KI. As alcohol consumption has associated with overweight and obesity, which Diseases and Dangerous Occurrences Regulations
large indirect impact on costs of public are linked to more deaths worldwide than (RIDDOR), the beverage industry ranks relatively
services, regulators have been addressing underweight as per WHO. Regulatory highly in terms of accident statistics – albeit lower
the problem of abusive alcohol consumption momentum on more labelling transparency than extractive industries. Injury rate averages can be
through restrictions on sales and advertising. and unhealthy ingredients presence have also explained by material handling strains, wet work
spread recently (e.g. sugar taxes) areas, transportation and misuse of chemicals.

RISK EXPOSURE/OPPORTUNITIES INDICATORS

• Percentage of revenue in product • Operations in areas where demand for • Operations in business lines and countries with
segments that target minors and/or healthier and nutritious food are projected high/moderate/low level of fatalities and
have addictive qualities to grow, revenue-weighted industrial injuries
• Health profile of product portfolio

RISK/OPPORTUNITIES MANAGEMENT INDICATORS


• Scope of reformulation programs (efforts • H&S policies, scope, and executive oversight,
• Responsible marketing standards/codes in reducing sugar, artificial ingredients, improvement targets, training initiatives,
• Training of marketing personnel on etc. from products) auditing, certifications
responsible marketing practices • R&D strategy and targets on healthier • Performance: Lost Time Injury Rate (lost time
• Controversies related to advertising products accidents per million hours) and Fatality Rate
• Bottom of the pyramid strategy (fatalities per thousand employees)
• H&S controversies

Weights are determined at the GICS sub-industry level


*Key issues for Brewers, Distillers & Vintners companies only, ** Key issues for Soft Drinks companies only
© 2019 MSCI Inc. All rights reserved. Please refer to the disclaimer at the end of this document.
MSCI.COM | PAGE 3 OF 19
Industry report I December 2019
MSCI ESG Research LLC

Key issues snapshot


Corporate Governance: Performance overview

The Beverages constituents of the MSCI ACWI Index (as of December 3, 2019) are highly controlled by corporate parents and families (vs. MSCI ACWI Index)
– 22 out of 46 are controlled by corporate parents, among which 7 are ultimately controlled by families; another 10 of the 46 are ultimately owned by the State.
In addition, 27% of companies adopt multiple or single share class with unequal voting rights as control enhancing mechanisms, among which 11 out of 12
are family-controlled (e.g. Brown-Forman, Constellation Brands, Heineken, Molson Coors, AB InBev, Pernod Ricard, and Campari).

Exhibit 2: Board and ownership structures: MSCI ACWI Index vs. Beverages Industry

Largest owner classification Key owner types* Control enhancing structures

Unique industry context: shareholder pooling agreements Unique industry context: All (11) stated-owned Unique industry context: the control enhancing
enabled dominant control of corporate parents, e.g. beverages companies are domiciled in China/HK. mechanisms highlighted below are most frequently
control of COCA-COLA FEMSA by FEMSA and Coca-Cola. used by family firms.

74%
48% 20%
39%
45%
24% 26% 8%
30% 21% 6% 7%
17% 19%
25% 2% 2%
0% 1%
13% 13%
0%
Multiple Voting Rights Single Share Golden
Share Limits Class w/ Shares
Controlled Principal Widely Held Founder Family State Corporate
Classes w/ Unequal
Parent Unequal Voting Rights
Beverages MSCI ACWI Index Beverages MSCI ACWI Index Voting Rights
Beverages MSCI ACWI Index

Controlling – Largest shareholder or shareholder group holds Founder – The founder/s of the company play an active role Multiple share classes with unequal voting rights – (or no
30% or more of the voting rights. in the company – e.g. serve as Chair and/or CEO, is a voting rights for one class) or classes that carry different
director or senior executive, a current shareholder. rights to vote on director appointments.
Principal – Largest shareholder or shareholder group holds
Family – Family hold 10% or more of the voting rights and
between 10% and 30% of the voting rights. maintain at least one board seat. Voting rights mechanisms – Include ceilings on ownership
or voting rights, limits based on nationality or additional
Widely Held – No shareholder or shareholder group holds State – State directly or indirectly controls 10% of the voting
voting rights accruing, depending on ownership duration.
greater than 10% of the voting rights. rights.
Corporate Parent – Issuer is a subsidiary (30% or more) of a Golden shares – Government veto rights for transactions or
corporate, which itself may be listed changes to governing documents.

Source: MSCI ESG Research, as of December 3, 2019 * Ownership types may overlap with key ownership classification.

© 2019 MSCI Inc. All rights reserved. Please refer to the disclaimer at the end of this document.
MSCI.COM | PAGE 4 OF 19
Industry report I December 2019
MSCI ESG Research LLC

Water Stress: Performance overview

Description: The x-axis indicates each company’s exposure to operational risks related to water Best performer | CCEP & AMBEV
stress based on the percentage of the company’s assets in areas facing water stress and the water
intensity of the company’s products. The y-axis indicates each company’s management of water Coca-Cola European Partners outperforms its peers in
resources in its own operations and supply chain, its water intensity relative to peers and usage trend reducing the environmental footprint of its operations
over time, and water-related controversies. and is currently the most water-efficient among the
soft drinks constituents of the MSCI ACWI Index (as of
December 3, 2019), with 1.61 liter of water used per
liter of product produced for past four years (sub-
industry average: 2.19).

Ambev continues to report the lowest water use


efficiency ratio among the brewer constituents of the
MSCI ACWI Index (as of December 3, 2019), at 2.94 hl
water use by hl of production in 2017. However, given
that Ambev sources about 60% of its barley from the
state of Rio Grande do Sul in Brazil, where drought and
flooding have occurred over past years, the company
faces increasing exposure to extreme weather risks in
its agricultural supply chain.

Biggest concern | Treasury Wine


Treasury Wine faces heightened water-related risks
following the heatwaves and droughts experienced in
Australia over past years. This is evidenced by the
year-on-year increase in the company’s water intensity
from 2017 to 2018 (12,621 vs. industry average of
15,614 m3/USD million sales).

Source: MSCI ESG Research, as of December 3, 2019

© 2019 MSCI Inc. All rights reserved. Please refer to the disclaimer at the end of this document.
MSCI.COM | PAGE 5 OF 19
Industry report I December 2019
MSCI ESG Research LLC

Water Stress in focus: Bottling facilities at risk


Beverage producers use freshwater as a key ingredient in their final products, as well as for washing, cooling and boiling purposes during the manufacturing
and bottling operations (see pg 8 for water intensities by sub-industry). Facilities can be significantly impacted if water stress escalated to restrictions on
water usage (e.g. TCCC has experienced at least 7 controversies related to community opposition on its water usage in India over past years). Companies that
concentrate their bottling operations in high or extremely-high water stress regions are at risk of operational disruptions (e.g. plant shut-down due to
conflicting water usage with local communities).

Exhibit 2: Companies that have 40% or more of their bottling facilities concentrated in high, extremely high or arid water stress regions 1

AB InBev (47%)
Spain, Belgium

Beijing Yanjing
Arca Continental (100%) Brewery (75%)
Mexico Northern China
Constellation Brands (44%)
California, Mexico

AB InBev (47%)
India
FEMSA (60%)
Mexico

Source: MSCI Climate Risk Center, MSCI ESG Research, World Resources Institute Aqueduct 3.0, 2019
1
35 out of 46 beverages constituents of the MSCI ACWI Index (as of December 3, 2019) that have facility data available from the MSCI Climate Risk Center are covered in this analysis

© 2019 MSCI Inc. All rights reserved. Please refer to the disclaimer at the end of this document.
MSCI.COM | PAGE 6 OF 19
Industry report I December 2019
MSCI ESG Research LLC

Product Safety & Quality: Performance overview


Description: Risk exposure (x-axis) is determined based on the revenues of companies derived from
Best performer | Heineken N.V.
products exposed to regulatory and reputational risks associated with product safety and misleading
or illegal marketing practices. The strength of each company’s risk management (y-axis) is Heineken demonstrates leading responsible marketing
determined based on commitments to and performance in responsible marketing and/or product practices with a dedicated policy, on which relevant
safety issues. employees and key suppliers have received training. The
company also has auditing mechanisms to ensure
compliance with its code and address related regulatory
and reputational risks. Heineken is also expanding its
portfolio of low and no-alcohol products (325 products
representing 5.5% of total volume in FY 2018) to further
promote responsible consumption.

Biggest concern | Asahi Group Holding


Asahi’s major business in alcohol manufacturing suggests
high exposure to regulatory and reputational risks
associated with misleading or illegal marketing practices.
As a member of the International Alliance for Responsible
Drinking (IARD), it has developed a responsible marketing
policy and auditing mechanisms to manage this risk.
However, we found no evidence of programs to develop low
or no-alcohol based products.

Source: MSCI ESG Research LLC. as of December 3, 2019

© 2019 MSCI Inc. All rights reserved. Please refer to the disclaimer at the end of this document.
MSCI.COM | PAGE 7 OF 19
Industry report I December 2019
MSCI ESG Research LLC

Water Stress in focus: Water intensities Product Safety & Quality in focus: Responsible marketing

On average, manufacturing and bottling operations at distillers & vintners Brewers, Distillers & Vintners may face reputational and regulatory risks
are 7 times more water intensive than soft drinks producers, and 3.7 times (fines, rise in excise duty or strengthening restrictions) in relation to
than brewers2. responsible marketing and sale of alcohol products.

Exhibit 3: Water intensities per liter of drink reported by companies Out of the 30 brewers, distillers & vintners constituents of MSCI ACWI
Index (as of December 3, 2019) that we score on this indicator, 86% have
Suntory
explicit policy articulated, including comprehensive responsible marketing
Coca-Cola Bottlers Japan code across products and regions. While half of them also have
Embotelladora Andina S.A systematic and regular audits towards their standards, only 6% (Campari,
COCA-COLA AMATIL
TCCC Pernod Ricard) have demonstrated best practice on training in terms of
Coca-Cola HBC scope and depth.
FRASER & NEAVE
Arca Continental Exhibit 4: Company practices on responsible marketing
FEMSA
COCA-COLA FEMSA
CCEP
Kirin Explicit policy Systematic and best practice on training
Asahi articulated regular audits by scope and depth
Anadolu Efes
Tsingtao Brewery
100%
MOLSON COORS
90%
Heineken
80%
CARLSBERG
70%
AB InBev
60%
AMBEV
50%
COMPANIA CERVECERIAS UNIDAS
40%
REMY COINTREAU
30%
PERNOD RICARD
20%
Campari
10%
CONSTELLATION BRANDS (spirits)
0%
DIAGEO
CONSTELLATION BRANDS (wine) Responsible marketing, Audit/control Trains employees on
UNITED SPIRITS advertising, and sales procedures on responsible marketing
responsible marketing and advertising
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 practices
Soft Drinks Brewers Distillers & Vintners
No evidence Some evidence Best Practice

Source: MSCI ESG Research, as of December 3, 2019

2Calculated based on most recent company reported water intensities per unit of product, as
of last rating date

© 2019 MSCI Inc. All rights reserved. Please refer to the disclaimer at the end of this document.
MSCI.COM | PAGE 8 OF 19
Industry report I December 2019
MSCI ESG Research LLC

Product Carbon Footprint: Performance overview


Description: The level of risk exposure (on the x-axis) to operational risks from fluctuating energy
Best performer | Coca-Cola HBC
costs is based on the extent to which companies' product portfolios consist of carbon-intensive
products as identified using a life-cycle assessment model estimating total GHG emissions. Risk Coca-Cola HBC demonstrates a strong capacity for
mitigation (on the y-axis) is measured based on the extent of companies’ programs to estimate and managing potential operational risks arising from resource
reduce the carbon-intensity of the raw inputs used in their products, as well as the manufacturing constraints by establishing supply chain programs that
and transportation of their products. address carbon emissions and water usage. The
company’s 2018 performance against its sustainability
targets affirms its leadership position in the Coca-Cola
Group, notably in adapting to climate change risks.

Biggest concern | Uni-President China


As a soft drink and food manufacturer, Uni-President China
has a high dependence on water for its primary business.
As a result, the company has a high exposure to the risk of
water price increases or water availability due to changing
climate conditions and water shortages in China. However,
the company has limited programs in place for reducing the
water requirements in its operations.

Source: MSCI ESG Research LLC. as of December 3, 2019


© 2019 MSCI Inc. All rights reserved. Please refer to the disclaimer at the end of this document.
MSCI.COM | PAGE 9 OF 19
Industry report I December 2019
MSCI ESG Research LLC

Packaging Material & Waste: Performance overview


Description: Risk exposure (x-axis) is determined based on the revenues of companies in regions
Best performer | The Coca-Cola Company
where packaging regulations are stringent or quickly evolving. The strength of each company’s risk
management (y-axis) is determined based on commitments to and performance in reducing In response to growing global concern over plastic
packaging. pollution, TCCC launched its “World Without Waste”
initiative in 2018, including plans to collect and recycle the
equivalent of 100% of its packaging by 2030. In 2019, TCCC
increased its use of bottles made from 100% recycled
materials and expanded its recycling partnerships.

With the EU moving to ban single-use plastics (including


soft drink containers, if their lids are not attached) and
requiring member states to collect 90% of plastic bottles by
2025, Coca Cola may face cost increases in redesigning its
bottles.

Biggest concern | Constellation Brands


The company has developed packaging weight reduction
programs in place for some of its wines, switching from
glass packaging to (recyclable) boxes in order to
lightweight the final products or reduce the weight of its
glass bottles. For its beer business, Constellation Brands
has initiated certain policies, including various initiatives in
the design stage of its products in order to reduce weight,
dimensions and volume of packaging materials.

However, unlike peers such as Carlsberg, Constellation


Brands does not disclose its overall packaging mix by type
of material, preventing us to assess its performance over
time to develop less carbon-intensive and recycled
packaging content.

Source: MSCI ESG Research LLC. as of December 3, 2019

© 2019 MSCI Inc. All rights reserved. Please refer to the disclaimer at the end of this document.
MSCI.COM | PAGE 10 OF 19
Industry report I December 2019
MSCI ESG Research LLC

Health & Safety: Performance overview


Description: Risk exposure is evaluated based on the varying levels of risks associated with
Best performer | Fraser & Neave
geographic standards and the types of operations. Risk management along the y-axis combines an
assessment of overall safety records (based on disclosed metrics, regulatory filings, or news reports) Fraser & Neave exhibits strengthened initiatives for
with strategies, goals, management systems, and improvement programs to manage and mitigate ensuring the health and safety (H&S) of its employees.
health and safety risks. Apart from obtaining OHSAS 18001 certification, Fraser
and Neave also has an internal H&S monitoring system and
emergency response teams to manage occupational
hazard issues. The company had a lower lost time injury
frequency rate of 1.38 case/million hours in 2018, relative
to its industry peers such as The Coca-Cola Company (1.9
case/million hours in 2018).

Biggest concern | Budweiser APAC


Budweiser Brewing Company APAC lags industry peers in
addressing workplace health and safety risks related to the
brewing process for beer products in comparison to peers,
which have obtained certification to internationally
recognized standards such as OHSAS 18001.

Source: MSCI ESG Research LLC. as of December 3, 2019

© 2019 MSCI Inc. All rights reserved. Please refer to the disclaimer at the end of this document.
MSCI.COM | PAGE 11 OF 19
Industry report I December 2019
MSCI ESG Research LLC

Appendices & scores


Appendix I | Company performance
Description: The report consists of 46 companies in the three following sub-GICS industries: Brewers (14 companies), Distillers & Vintners (18 companies),
Soft Drinks (14 companies), constituents of the MSCI ACWI Index as of December 3, 2019.

Country Rating
Current Rating
Brewers Prior Rating Rating Date
Rating Trend
HEIA Heineken N.V. NL A A 28/Nov/19 Maintain
2502 Asahi Group Holdings, Ltd. JP BB BB 2/Aug/18 Maintain
2503 Kirin Holdings Company, Limited JP BBB A 2/Aug/18 Upgrade
291 China Resources Beer (Holdings) Company Limited HK B B 15/Nov/19 Maintain
729 Beijing Yanjing Brewery Co., Ltd. CN CCC CCC 3/May/19 Maintain
AEFES ANADOLU EFES BIRACILIK VE MALT SANAYII ANONIM SIRKETI TR A A 2/Apr/19 Maintain
CARL B CARLSBERG A/S DK AA AA 30/Jul/18 Maintain
CCU COMPANIA CERVECERIAS UNIDAS S.A. CL A A 2/Jul/19 Maintain
HEIO Heineken Holding N.V. NL A A 28/Nov/19 Maintain
TAP MOLSON COORS BREWING COMPANY US A AA 2/Aug/18 Upgrade
600600 Tsingtao Brewery Company Limited CN BB BB 5/Sep/19 Maintain
ABEV3 AMBEV S.A. BR A AA 2/Aug/18 Upgrade
ABI ANHEUSER-BUSCH INBEV N.V. BE AA AA 12/Jul/18 Maintain
1876 Budweiser Brewing Company APAC Ltd HK - BB 30/Oct/19 Initiate

Country Rating
Distillers & Vintners Prior Current Rating
Rating Date
Rating Rating Trend
DGE DIAGEO PLC GB AAA AAA 18/Jul/18 Maintain
CPR DAVIDE CAMPARI-MILANO S.P.A. IT BBB BBB 12/Sep/19 Maintain
600809 SHANXI XINGHUACUN FEN WINE FACTORY CO., LTD. CN B B 29/Jan/19 Maintain
RI PERNOD RICARD S.A. FR AA AA 2/Aug/18 Maintain
BF.B BROWN-FORMAN CORPORATION US BB BBB 27/Aug/18 Upgrade
600779 Sichuan Swellfun Co., Ltd. CN - B 29/Jan/19 Initiate
596 ANHUI GUJING DISTILLERY COMPANY LIMITED CN B B 7/May/19 Maintain

© 2019 MSCI Inc. All rights reserved. Please refer to the disclaimer at the end of this document.
MSCI.COM | PAGE 12 OF 19
Industry report I December 2019
MSCI ESG Research LLC

860 BEIJING SHUNXIN AGRICULTURE CO.,LTD CN - BB 29/Apr/19 Initiate


STZ CONSTELLATION BRANDS, INC. US BB BB 30/Jul/18 Maintain
600519 Kweichow Moutai Co., Ltd. CN B B 5/Sep/19 Maintain
568 Luzhou Laojiao CO.,LTD CN B B 29/Jan/19 Maintain
RCO REMY COINTREAU S.A. FR A A 15/Nov/19 Maintain
MCDOWELL-N UNITED SPIRITS LIMITED IN BB BB 10/Oct/19 Maintain
858 Wuliangye Yibin Co., Ltd. CN B B 29/Jan/19 Maintain
2304 Jiangsu Yanghe Brewery Joint-stock Co., Ltd. CN CCC B 4/Sep/19 Upgrade
TWE TREASURY WINE ESTATES LIMITED AU A A 15/Nov/19 Maintain
603369 Jiangsu King's Luck Brewery Joint-Stock Co Ltd CN B B 17/Apr/19 Maintain
603589 Anhui Kouzi Distillery Co Ltd CN CCC CCC 2/Apr/19 Maintain

Country Rating
Soft Drinks Prior
Current Rating Rating Date Rating Trend
Rating
AC* Arca Continental, S.A.B. de C.V. MX A A 2/Oct/19 Maintain
MNST MONSTER BEVERAGE CORPORATION US CCC CCC 12/Nov/19 Maintain
KOFUBL COCA-COLA FEMSA, S.A.B. DE C.V. MX AA A 28/Nov/19 Downgrade
KO THE COCA-COLA COMPANY US A AA 13/Nov/19 Upgrade
2579 Coca-Cola Bottlers Japan Holdings Inc. JP B B 2/Jul/19 Maintain
CCL COCA-COLA AMATIL LIMITED AU AA AA 28/Nov/19 Maintain
FEMSAB Fomento Economico Mexicano, S.A.B. de C.V. MX BBB BBB 03/Dec/19 Maintain
F&N FRASER & NEAVE HOLDINGS BHD. MY A BBB 29/Aug/19 Downgrade
PEP Pepsico, Inc. US AA AA 27/Aug/18 Maintain
220 UNI-PRESIDENT CHINA HOLDINGS LTD. CN B B 28/Nov/19 Maintain
AKO.A Embotelladora Andina S.A CL A BBB 28/Nov/19 Downgrade
CCH Coca-Cola HBC AG CH AAA AAA 03/Dec/19 Maintain
2587 Suntory Beverage & Food Limited JP A BBB 5/Sep/19 Downgrade
CCEP COCA-COLA EUROPEAN PARTNERS PLC GB AAA AAA 28/Nov/19 Maintain

© 2019 MSCI Inc. All rights reserved. Please refer to the disclaimer at the end of this document.
MSCI.COM | PAGE 13 OF 19
Industry report I December 2019
MSCI ESG Research LLC

Appendix II | Company performance on key issues


Description: The table below indicates ratings and key issue rankings for the Beverages industry. Ratings, quartiles and company scores were correct as of
December 3, 2019, and may since have changed due to frequent updates. In cases of discrepancies between the company report and industry report, the
company report should be considered definitive.

ENVIRONMENT SOCIAL GOVERNANCE

Product Packaging Product Company ESG Rating


Brewers Water Health & Corporate
Carbon Material & Safety & Specific and Trend
Stress Safety Governance
Footprint Waste Quality
11% 22% 11% 11% 22% 23%
MOLSON COORS BREWING COMPANY ●●●● ●● ●● ●●●● ●●●● ● AA ↑

CARLSBERG A/S ●●● ●● ●●● ●●●● ●●●● ●●● AA ↔

AMBEV S.A. ●● ●●●● ●●● ● ●●●● ●● AA ↑

ANHEUSER-BUSCH INBEV N.V. ●●● ●●●● ●● ●● ●●● ●●●● AA ↔

Kirin Holdings Company, Limited ●●●● ● ●●● ●● ●●● ●● *ONH A ↑

Heineken N.V. ●●●● ●●● ● ●●● ●●●● ●●● A ↔

COMPANIA CERVECERIAS UNIDAS S.A. ●●●● ● ●●●● ●● ●●●● ●● *ONH A ↔


ANADOLU EFES BIRACILIK VE MALT SANAYII
ANONIM SIRKETI ●●● ●●●● ●●●● ●●● ●●● ● *ONH A ↔

Heineken Holding N.V. ●●●● ●●● ● ●●● ●●●● ● A ↔

Tsingtao Brewery Company Limited ● ●●● ●● ●●● ●●● ●●● *CI BB ↔

Asahi Group Holdings, Ltd. ●●● ●● ●● ● ●● ●●● *ONH BB ↔

Budweiser Brewing Company APAC Ltd ● ● ●●● ● ●●● ●●● BB new

China Resources Beer (Holdings) Company Limited ● ● ●●●● ●●● ●● ● *CI B ↔

Beijing Yanjing Brewery Co., Ltd. ● ● ●● ● ● ● *CI CCC ↔

*Indicates company-specific Key Issues and/or Weights


*ONH=Opportunities in Nutrition & Health|*CI=Corruption & Instability|
QUARTILE KEY: ● Bottom Quartile; ●● Third Quartile; ●●● Second Quartile; ●●●● Top Quartile
RATING TREND KEY: ↔ maintain ↑ upgrade ↑↑ two or more notch upgrade ↓ downgrade ↓↓ two or more notch downgrade

© 2019 MSCI Inc. All rights reserved. Please refer to the disclaimer at the end of this document.
MSCI.COM | PAGE 14 OF 19
Industry report I December 2019
MSCI ESG Research LLC

ENVIRONMENT SOCIAL GOVERNANCE

Product Packaging Product Company ESG Rating and


Distillers & Vintners Water Health & Corporate
Carbon Material & Safety & Specific Trend
Stress Safety Governance
Footprint Waste Quality
11% 22% 11% 11% 22% 23%
DIAGEO PLC ●●●● ●●●● ●●● ●●●● ●●●● ●●●● AAA ↔

PERNOD RICARD S.A. ●●●● ●●● ●● ●● ●●●● ●●●● AA ↔

REMY COINTREAU S.A. ●●●● ●●● ●● ●● ●●●● ●● A ↔

TREASURY WINE ESTATES LIMITED ●●● ● ●● ●●● ●●●● ●●●● A ↔

BROWN-FORMAN CORPORATION ●●● ●●●● ● ●● ●●● ●●●● BBB ↑

DAVIDE CAMPARI-MILANO S.P.A. ●●● ●●● ● ●●● ●●●● ●● BBB ↔

CONSTELLATION BRANDS, INC. ●● ● ● ●●● ●●● ● BB ↔

UNITED SPIRITS LIMITED ●● ●●● ●●● ● ●●● ●● BB ↔

BEIJING SHUNXIN AGRICULTURE CO.,LTD ● ●●● ●● ● ●● ●●● *CI BB new

Wuliangye Yibin Co., Ltd. ● ●● ● ●● ●● ●● *CI B ↔

Luzhou Laojiao CO.,LTD ● ●● ● ● ●● ●●●● *CI B ↔

ANHUI GUJING DISTILLERY COMPANY LIMITED ●● ●● ●● ●● ●● ● *CI B ↔


SHANXI XINGHUACUN FEN WINE FACTORY CO.,
LTD. ●● ●● ●● ●● ●● ● *CI B ↔

Jiangsu King's Luck Brewery Joint-Stock Co Ltd ●● ●● ●● ● ● ●●●● *CI B ↔

Jiangsu Yanghe Brewery Joint-stock Co., Ltd. ● ● ● ● ● ●●● *CI B ↑

*Indicates company-specific Key Issues and/or Weights


*CI=Corruption & Instability|
QUARTILE KEY: ● Bottom Quartile; ●● Third Quartile; ●●● Second Quartile; ●●●● Top Quartile
RATING TREND KEY: ↔ maintain ↑ upgrade ↑↑ two or more notch upgrade ↓ downgrade ↓↓ two or more notch downgrade

© 2019 MSCI Inc. All rights reserved. Please refer to the disclaimer at the end of this document.
MSCI.COM | PAGE 15 OF 19
Industry report I December 2019
MSCI ESG Research LLC

ENVIRONMENT ENVIRONMENT SOCIAL SOCIAL GOVERNANCE

Product Packaging Product Company ESG Rating and


Distillers & Vintners Water Health & Corporate
Carbon Material & Safety & Specific Trend
Stress Safety Governance
Footprint Waste Quality
11% 22% 11% 11% 22% 23%
Kweichow Moutai Co., Ltd. ● ●● ● ● ●● ●● *CI B ↔

Sichuan Swellfun Co., Ltd. ●● ● ● ● ●● ●●●● B new

Anhui Kouzi Distillery Co Ltd ● ● ● ● ● ●● CCC ↔

*Indicates company-specific Key Issues and/or Weights


*CI=Corruption & Instability|
QUARTILE KEY: ● Bottom Quartile; ●● Third Quartile; ●●● Second Quartile; ●●●● Top Quartile
RATING TREND KEY: ↔ maintain ↑ upgrade ↑↑ two or more notch upgrade ↓ downgrade ↓↓ two or more notch downgrade

© 2019 MSCI Inc. All rights reserved. Please refer to the disclaimer at the end of this document.
MSCI.COM | PAGE 16 OF 19
Industry report I December 2019
MSCI ESG Research LLC

ENVIRONMENT SOCIAL GOVERNANCE

Product Packaging Opportunities Company ESG Rating and


Soft Drinks Water Health & Corporate
Carbon Material & in Nutrition & Specific Trend
Stress Safety Governance
Footprint Waste Health
11% 22% 11% 11% 22% 23%
Coca-Cola HBC AG ●●●● ●●●● ●●●● ●●●● ●●● ●●●● AAA ↔

COCA-COLA EUROPEAN PARTNERS PLC ●●●● ●●●● ●●● ●●●● ●●●● ●● AAA ↔

Pepsico, Inc. ●●●● ●●● ●●●● ●●●● ●●●● ●●●● *PSQ AA ↔

COCA-COLA AMATIL LIMITED ●●● ●●● ●●●● ●●● ●● ●●●● AA ↔

THE COCA-COLA COMPANY ●●●● ● ●●●● ●●●● ● ●● AA ↑

COCA-COLA FEMSA, S.A.B. DE C.V. ●●● ●●●● ●●●● ●●●● ●●●● ● A ↓

Arca Continental, S.A.B. de C.V. ●● ●●● ●●●● ●●●● ●● ●●● A ↔

FRASER & NEAVE HOLDINGS BHD. ● ●●●● ●●●● ●●●● ●●●● ● BBB ↓

Suntory Beverage & Food Limited ●●● ●●●● ●●● ●●●● ●●●● ● BBB ↓

Fomento Economico Mexicano, S.A.B. de C.V. ●●● ●●●● ●●●● ●●●● ●●● ● *PSQ BBB ↔

Embotelladora Andina S.A ● ●● ●●●● ●● ●●● ●●● BBB ↓

Coca-Cola Bottlers Japan Holdings Inc. ●● ●● ● ●● ● ●●●● B ↔

UNI-PRESIDENT CHINA HOLDINGS LTD. ● ● ●●● ●●● ●● ● *PSQ B ↔

MONSTER BEVERAGE CORPORATION ● ● ●●● ● ● ●●● CCC ↔

*Indicates company-specific Key Issues and/or Weights


*PSQ=Product Safety & Quality|
QUARTILE KEY: ● Bottom Quartile; ●● Third Quartile; ●●● Second Quartile; ●●●● Top Quartile
RATING TREND KEY: ↔ maintain ↑ upgrade ↑↑ two or more notch upgrade ↓ downgrade ↓↓ two or more notch downgrade

© 2019 MSCI Inc. All rights reserved. Please refer to the disclaimer at the end of this document.
MSCI.COM | PAGE 17 OF 19
Industry report I December 2019
MSCI ESG Research LLC

ABOUT MSCI ESG RESEARCH PRODUCTS AND SERVICES

MSCI ESG Research products and services are provided by MSCI ESG Research
CONTACT US AMERICAS
LLC, and are designed to provide in-depth research, ratings and analysis of
+ 1 212 804 5299
esgclientservice@msci.com environmental, social and governance-related business practices to companies
worldwide. ESG ratings, data and analysis from MSCI ESG Research LLC. are also
EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA used in the construction of the MSCI ESG Indexes. MSCI ESG Research LLC is a
+ 44 20 7618 2510 Registered Investment Adviser under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 and a
subsidiary of MSCI Inc.
ASIA PACIFIC
+ 612 9033 9339
ABOUT MSCI

MSCI is a leading provider of critical decision support tools and services for the
global investment community. With over 45 years of expertise in research, data and
technology, we power better investment decisions by enabling clients to
understand and analyze key drivers of risk and return and confidently build more
effective portfolios. We create industry-leading research-enhanced solutions that
clients use to gain insight into and improve transparency across the investment
process.

For more information, visit us at www.msci.com.

© 2019 MSCI Inc. All rights reserved. Please refer to the disclaimer at the end of this document.
MSCI.COM | PAGE 18 OF 19
Industry report I December 2019
MSCI ESG Research LLC

NOTICE AND • This document and all of the information contained in it, including without limitation all text, data, graphs, charts (collectively, the “Information”) is the property of MSCI Inc. or its subsidiaries
(collectively, “MSCI”), or MSCI’s licensors, direct or indirect suppliers or any third party involved in making or compiling any Information (collectively, with MSCI, the “Information Providers”)
and is provided for informational purposes only. The Information may not be modified, reverse-engineered, reproduced or redisseminated in whole or in part without prior written permission
DISCLAIMER from MSCI.
• The Information may not be used to create derivative works or to verify or correct other data or information. For example (but without limitation), the Information may not be used to create
indexes, databases, risk models, analytics, software, or in connection with the issuing, offering, sponsoring, managing or marketing of any securities, portfolios, financial products or other
investment vehicles utilizing or based on, linked to, tracking or otherwise derived from the Information or any other MSCI data, information, products or services.
• The user of the Information assumes the entire risk of any use it may make or permit to be made of the Information. NONE OF THE INFORMATION PROVIDERS MAKES ANY EXPRESS OR
IMPLIED WARRANTIES OR REPRESENTATIONS WITH RESPECT TO THE INFORMATION (OR THE RESULTS TO BE OBTAINED BY THE USE THEREOF), AND TO THE MAXIMUM EXTENT
PERMITTED BY APPLICABLE LAW, EACH INFORMATION PROVIDER EXPRESSLY DISCLAIMS ALL IMPLIED WARRANTIES (INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF
ORIGINALITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, NON-INFRINGEMENT, COMPLETENESS, MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE) WITH RESPECT TO ANY OF THE
INFORMATION.
• Without limiting any of the foregoing and to the maximum extent permitted by applicable law, in no event shall any Information Provider have any liability regarding any of the Information for
any direct, indirect, special, punitive, consequential (including lost profits) or any other damages even if notified of the possibility of such damages. The foregoing shall not exclude or limit any
liability that may not by applicable law be excluded or limited, including without limitation (as applicable), any liability for death or personal injury to the extent that such injury results from the
negligence or willful default of itself, its servants, agents or sub-contractors.
• Information containing any historical information, data or analysis should not be taken as an indication or guarantee of any future performance, analysis, forecast or prediction. Past
performance does not guarantee future results.
• The Information should not be relied on and is not a substitute for the skill, judgment and experience of the user, its management, employees, advisors and/or clients when making investment
and other business decisions. All Information is impersonal and not tailored to the needs of any person, entity or group of persons.
• None of the Information constitutes an offer to sell (or a solicitation of an offer to buy), any security, financial product or other investment vehicle or any trading strategy.
• It is not possible to invest directly in an index. Exposure to an asset class or trading strategy or other category represented by an index is only available through third party investable instruments
(if any) based on that index. MSCI does not issue, sponsor, endorse, market, offer, review or otherwise express any opinion regarding any fund, ETF, derivative or other security, investment,
financial product or trading strategy that is based on, linked to or seeks to provide an investment return related to the performance of any MSCI index (collectively, “Index Linked Investments”).
MSCI makes no assurance that any Index Linked Investments will accurately track index performance or provide positive investment returns. MSCI Inc. is not an investment adviser or fiduciary
and MSCI makes no representation regarding the advisability of investing in any Index Linked Investments.
• Index returns do not represent the results of actual trading of investible assets/securities. MSCI maintains and calculates indexes, but does not manage actual assets. Index returns do not
reflect payment of any sales charges or fees an investor may pay to purchase the securities underlying the index or Index Linked Investments. The imposition of these fees and charges would
cause the performance of an Index Linked Investment to be different than the MSCI index performance.
• The Information may contain back tested data. Back-tested performance is not actual performance, but is hypothetical. There are frequently material differences between back tested
performance results and actual results subsequently achieved by any investment strategy.
• Constituents of MSCI equity indexes are listed companies, which are included in or excluded from the indexes according to the application of the relevant index methodologies. Accordingly,
constituents in MSCI equity indexes may include MSCI Inc., clients of MSCI or suppliers to MSCI. Inclusion of a security within an MSCI index is not a recommendation by MSCI to buy, sell, or
hold such security, nor is it considered to be investment advice.
• Data and information produced by various affiliates of MSCI Inc., including MSCI ESG Research LLC and Barra LLC, may be used in calculating certain MSCI indexes. More information can be
found in the relevant index methodologies on www.msci.com.
• MSCI receives compensation in connection with licensing its indexes to third parties. MSCI Inc.’s revenue includes fees based on assets in Index Linked Investments. Information can be found
in MSCI Inc.’s company filings on the Investor Relations section of www.msci.com.
• MSCI ESG Research LLC is a Registered Investment Adviser under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 and a subsidiary of MSCI Inc. Except with respect to any applicable products or services
from MSCI ESG Research, neither MSCI nor any of its products or services recommends, endorses, approves or otherwise expresses any opinion regarding any issuer, securities, financial
products or instruments or trading strategies and MSCI’s products or services are not intended to constitute investment advice or a recommendation to make (or refrain from making) any
kind of investment decision and may not be relied on as such. Issuers mentioned or included in any MSCI ESG Research materials may include MSCI Inc., clients of MSCI or suppliers to MSCI,
and may also purchase research or other products or services from MSCI ESG Research. MSCI ESG Research materials, including materials utilized in any MSCI ESG Indexes or other products,
have not been submitted to, nor received approval from, the United States Securities and Exchange Commission or any other regulatory body.
• Any use of or access to products, services or information of MSCI requires a license from MSCI. MSCI, Barra, RiskMetrics, IPD and other MSCI brands and product names are the trademarks,
service marks, or registered trademarks of MSCI or its subsidiaries in the United States and other jurisdictions. The Global Industry Classification Standard (GICS) was developed by and is the
exclusive property of MSCI and Standard & Poor’s. “Global Industry Classification Standard (GICS)” is a service mark of MSCI and Standard & Poor’s.
• MIFID2/MIFIR notice: MSCI ESG Research LLC does not distribute or act as an intermediary for financial instruments or structured deposits, nor does it deal on its own account, provide
execution services for others or manage client accounts. No MSCI ESG Research product or service supports, promotes or is intended to support or promote any such activity. MSCI ESG
Research is an independent provider of ESG data, reports and ratings based on published methodologies and available to clients on a subscription basis. We do not provide custom or one-off
ratings or recommendations of securities or other financial instruments upon request.
• Privacy notice: For information about how MSCI ESG Research LLC collects and uses personal data concerning officers and directors, please refer to our Privacy Notice at
https://www.msci.com/privacy-pledge.

© 2019 MSCI Inc. All rights reserved. Please refer to the disclaimer at the end of this document.
MSCI.COM | PAGE 19 OF 19

You might also like