WORKSHEET 2.

(ANALYSIS OF PROGRAM-SPECIFIC PROBLEMS AND STATEMENT OF PROGRAM GOALS AND OPERATIONAL GOALS BY PROGRAM AND AREA)

CAUSES OF THE PROBLEM STATEMENT OF GOALS

AREA/ RANK STATEMENT OF THE
PROGRAMS PROBLEM DOH-CONTROLLED NON-DOH PROGRAM GOAL OPERATIONAL GOAL
CONTROLLED
CARI/IMCI Data/Status: High incidence of Poor implementation Negative beliefs and By the end of December 1. To increase active case
3 checks Upper Respiratory of CARI program in attitudes of mothers 2020 the incidence of ARI finding of URTI/ARI.
0 C’s Tract Infection (URTI) the community due to: towards health care will decrease from: 10- 6  Improve
or Acute Respiratory >Lack of trainings of services: (25/1000-15/1000) implementation of
Tanauan: A infection BHW’s in early  Not submitting CARI/IMCI program in
Proper: A detection of ARI their children for the community.
Maghipid: A >Inadequate Health immunization for  Increase/improve
manpower resource. fear of side mobilization of
Tanuan: 3-1 BHW’s in case
>Poor Case finding effects.
(8/1000-3/1000) finding.
activities on  Not submitting
identifying ARI cases. their children for Proper: 6-4  Improve master
>Insufficient IEC consultation (15/1000-10/1000) listing using
activities on: thinking that the Maghipid: 1-0 appropriate forms.
 Sign and illness is brought (3/1000-0/1000)  Increase KAS of
symptoms of along by some BHWs on URTI/ARI
ARI. climate change casefinding.
and can be treated 2. To conduct regular
 Prevention and
by home consultations and follow
control of ARI.
management. up of URTI/ARI.
 Management of 3. To improve
ARI  Reliance on
management & referral
 When to seek traditional/herbal
cases identified.
consultation medicines
 Improve health
 Proper nutrition  Care is trusted to
seeking behavior of
>No regular schedule young siblings
the community to
of barangay clinic.  Conflict with
increase KSA of the
>Inadequate budget domestic and community people

1
 WORKSHEET 2.1

(ANALYSIS OF PROGRAM-SPECIFIC PROBLEMS AND STATEMENT OF PROGRAM GOALS AND OPERATIONAL GOALS BY PROGRAM AND AREA)

allocation of drugs, socio-economic on URTI/ARI:

supplies& equipment activities  Nature
in ARI management.  Low resistance to  Early
Poor implementation infection due to: detection
of IMCI due to:  Poor and seeking.
> Lack of trained nutrition  Importance
manpower resources.  Repetitive of early
>Poor utilization of exposure referral.
referral system by to 4. Increase coverage of
BHW’s in referring pathogens/ FIC.
cases of ARI. allergens  Improve
>Delayed referral due implementation of
 Changing
to utilization of herbal EPI program.
weather
preparation of mothers.  To improve
conditions.
masterlisting of
children 0-1 years
 Lack of
old.
Knowledge on
 To improve
prevention &
mobilization of BHWs
control, early
in the masterlisting of
Detection of ARI children 0-11
 Utilization of months.
traditional way of  To increase
managing children coordination of RHM
with active regarding the
respiratory schedule & actual
infection resulting immunization of EPI
into delayed targets in concerned
health seeking brgys.
behavior.
 Large Family Size

2
 WORKSHEET 2.1

(ANALYSIS OF PROGRAM-SPECIFIC PROBLEMS AND STATEMENT OF PROGRAM GOALS AND OPERATIONAL GOALS BY PROGRAM AND AREA)

 Poor EVS
-burning of refuse
disposal
-high number of
households with
open drainage
 Lack of
cooperation of
Community
People

3
 WORKSHEET 2.1

(ANALYSIS OF PROGRAM-SPECIFIC PROBLEMS AND STATEMENT OF PROGRAM GOALS AND OPERATIONAL GOALS BY PROGRAM AND AREA)

CAUSES OF THE PROBLEM STATEMENT OF GOALS

AREA/ RANK STATEMENT OF DOH-CONTROLLED NON-DOH CONTROLLED PROGRAM GOAL OPERATIONAL GOAL
PROGRAMS THE PROBLEM
IMCI Data/Status: High incidence of Poor implementation of Negative beliefs and By the end of 1. To increase active case finding of
CDD 3 checks Diarrhea IMCI program in the attitudes of mothers December 2020 Diarrhea cases.
0 C’s community due to: towards health care the incidence of  Improve implementation of
>Lack of trainings of services: ARI will decrease CDD/IMCI program in the
Tanauan: A BHW’s in early  Not submitting their from: 4- 1 community.
Proper: A detection of Diarrhea children for  Increase/improve mobilization
(10/1000-
Maghipid: A >Inadequate Health immunization for of BHW’s in case finding.
3/1000)
manpower resource. fear of side effects.  Improve master listing using
Poor Case finding  Not submitting their appropriate forms.
activities on identifying children for  Increase KAS of BHWs on
Diarrhea cases. consultation diarrhea casefinding.
>Insufficient IEC thinking that the Tanuan: 1-0 2. To conduct regular consultations
activities on: illness is brought (3/1000-0/1000) and follow up of diarrhea.
 Sign and along by some Proper: 2-1 3. To improve management &
symptoms of climate change and (5/1000-3/1000) referral cases identified.
diarrhea. can be treated by Maghipid: 1-0  Improve health seeking
home management. behavior of the community to
 Prevention and (3/1000-0/1000)
 Reliance on increase KSA of the
control of
traditional/herbal community people on
diarrhea.
medicines diarrhea:
 Management of  Nature
diarrhea  Care is trusted to
young siblings  Early detection and
 When to seek seeking.
consultation  Conflict with
 Importance of early
 Proper nutrition domestic and socio-
referral.
>No regular schedule of economic activities
4. Increase coverage of FIC.
barangay clinic.  Low resistance to
 Improve implementation of
>Inadequate budget infection due to:

4
 WORKSHEET 2.1

(ANALYSIS OF PROGRAM-SPECIFIC PROBLEMS AND STATEMENT OF PROGRAM GOALS AND OPERATIONAL GOALS BY PROGRAM AND AREA)

allocation of drugs,  Poor EPI program.

supplies& equipment in nutrition.  To improve masterlisting of
management of children 0-5 years old.
diarrhea.  Lack of Knowledge  To improve mobilization of
Poor implementation of on prevention & BHWs in the masterlisting of
IMCI due to: control, early children 0-59 months.
> Lack of trained Detection of  To increase coordination of
manpower resources. diarrhea. RHM regarding the schedule &
>Poor utilization of  Utilization of actual immunization of EPI
referral system by traditional way of targets in concerned brgys.
BHW’s in referring managing children
cases of diarrhea. with active
>Delayed referral due respiratory infection
to utilization of herbal resulting into
preparation of mothers. delayed health
seeking behavior.
 Large Family Size
 Poor EVS
-burning of refuse
disposal
-high number of
households with
open drainage
 Lack of cooperation
of Community
People

 Poor socio-
economic status of
the family that tend

5
 WORKSHEET 2.1

(ANALYSIS OF PROGRAM-SPECIFIC PROBLEMS AND STATEMENT OF PROGRAM GOALS AND OPERATIONAL GOALS BY PROGRAM AND AREA)

to hinder them to
avail quality
nutritious food for
their daily needs.
 Poor quality of care
of children below 5
years old

 Poor housing
condition such as
small living space or
overcrowding which
increases the risk of
disease transmission
among family
members.
 Poor utilization of
services
-Distance from
health facility
-Inadequate money of
client going to RHU for
consultation.

6
 WORKSHEET 2.1

(ANALYSIS OF PROGRAM-SPECIFIC PROBLEMS AND STATEMENT OF PROGRAM GOALS AND OPERATIONAL GOALS BY PROGRAM AND AREA)

CAUSES OF THE PROBLEM STATEMENT OF GOALS

AREA/ RANK STATEMENT OF THE DOH-CONTROLLED NON-DOH CONTROLLED PROGRAM GOAL OPERATIONAL GOAL
PROGRAMS PROBLEM
EHS Refuse Disposal Poor EVS Inadequate  Poor environmental By the end of 1. To improve
Data/Status:  Poor Refuse Disposal implementation of EHP in sanitation. December 2020 the implementation
3 checks (Open Dumping and the community due to:  Lack of brgy resolution EVS status will
3 C’s burning)  Inadequate IEC regarding the proper improve by:
 Blind Drainage activities on: disposal of refuse and
 Decreasing
Tanauan: C  Proper water waste sewage.
households
Proper: C and refuse disposal  Inadequate income of
using burning
Maghipid: C  Ineffective monitoring the family that tend to
schemes by BHWs due hinder them to and open-
Blind Drainage: to reporting construct sanitation dumping from:
Data/Status: techniques of BHWs: facilities ( garbage can, 100-57 HH
3 checks  No master list of blind drainage, fence) (94.34%-
3 C’s households  Inadequate income of 53.77%)
without blind the family that tend to
Tanauan: C drainage. hinder them to avail
Proper: C  Lack of DOH training quality and nutritious
Maghipid: C on EHP for BHWs food for their daily
Tanuan: 39-27
particularly on proper needs.
(36.79%-25.47%)
water waste disposal.  Negative beliefs and
Proper: 44-21
 Lack of information attitudes of people
towards environmental (41.51%-19.81%)
dissemination on:
 The importance of sanitation: Maghipid: 17-9
Proper waste  Low salience on (16.04%-8.49%)
disposal. effects of poor
 Effects to the environmental
environment and sanitation.  Decreasing
health of improper  Lack of households
environmental

7
 WORKSHEET 2.1

(ANALYSIS OF PROGRAM-SPECIFIC PROBLEMS AND STATEMENT OF PROGRAM GOALS AND OPERATIONAL GOALS BY PROGRAM AND AREA)

waste disposal. sanitation related having open-

 No regular schedule of policy of the drainage
visit done by RSI. barangays. from : 78-45
 Inadequate knowledge HH
of community people
(73.58%-
on:
42.45%)
 Proper practice of
waste disposal.
 Advantages and
disadvantages of Tanuan: 26-15
practicing proper (24.53%-14.15%)
waste disposal. Proper: 37-22
(34.91%-20.75%)
Maghipid: 15-8
(14.15%-7.55%)

8
 WORKSHEET 2.1

(ANALYSIS OF PROGRAM-SPECIFIC PROBLEMS AND STATEMENT OF PROGRAM GOALS AND OPERATIONAL GOALS BY PROGRAM AND AREA)

UNIVERSITY OF THE PHILIPPINES MANILA

SCHOOL OF HEALTH SCIENCES
PALO, LEYTE – MAIN CAMPUS

Worksheet 2.1
BRGY. Magtino, llorente, eastern samar

SUBMITTED BY:

FERRY ANN B. MONTES

BSN 37TH

SUBMITTED TO:

PROF. CARMEN N. FIRMO, PhD

COMMUNITY PRECEPTOR

9
 WORKSHEET 2.1

(ANALYSIS OF PROGRAM-SPECIFIC PROBLEMS AND STATEMENT OF PROGRAM GOALS AND OPERATIONAL GOALS BY PROGRAM AND AREA)

10