Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 3

MERCEDES GOES AFTER YOUNGER BUYERS

Mercedes and BMW have been competing head-to-head for market share in the luxury-car market for
more than four decades. Back in 1959, BMW (Bayerische Motoren Werke) almost went bankrupt and
nearly sold out to Daimler-Benz, the maker of Mercedes-Benz cars. BMW was able to recover to the
point that in 1992 it passed Mercedes in worldwide sales. Among the reasons for BMW’s success was its
ability to sell models that were more luxurious than previous models but still focused on consumer
quality and environmental responsibility. In particular, BMW targeted its sales pitch to the younger
market, whereas Mercedes retained a more mature customer base. In response to BMW’s success,
Mercedes has been trying to change their image by launching several products in an effort to attract
younger buyers who are interested in sporty, performance-oriented cars. BMW, influenced by
Mercedes, is pushing for more refinement and comfort. In fact, one automotive expert says that
Mercedes wants to become BMW, and vice versa. However, according to one recent automotive expert,
the focus is still on luxury and comfort for Mercedes while BMW focuses on performance and driving
dynamics. Even though each company produces many different models, two relatively comparable
coupe automobiles are the BMW 3 Series Coupe 335i and the Mercedes CLK350 Coupe. In a recent year,
the national U.S. market price for the BMW 3 Series Coupe 335i was $39,368 and for the Mercedes
CLK350 Couple was $44,520. Gas mileage for both of these cars is around 17 mpg in town and 25 mpg
on the highway.

Discussion

1. Suppose Mercedes is concerned that dealer prices of the CLK350 Coupe are not consistent and that
even though the average price is $44,520, actual prices are normally distributed with a standard
deviation of $2,981. Suppose also that Mercedes believes that at $43,000, the CLK350 Coupe is priced
out of the BMW 3 Series Coupe 335i market. What percentage of the dealer prices for the Mercedes
CLK350 Coupe is more than $43,000 and hence priced out of the BMW 3 Series Coupe 335i market? The
average price for a BMW 3 Series Coupe 335i is $39,368. Suppose these prices are also normally
distributed with a standard deviation of $2,367. What percentage of BMW dealers are pricing the BMW
3 Series Coupe 335i at more than the average price for a Mercedes CLK350 Coupe? What might this
mean to BMW if dealers were pricing the 3 Series Couple 335i at this level? What percentage of
Mercedes dealers are pricing the CLK350 Couple at less than the average price of a BMW 3 Series Coupe
335i?

Answer:
1. a.)Prob(x > 43,000 | μ = 44,520 and σ = 2981):
Z= (43,000-44,520)/2,981= -0.51
From Table A.5, the area for z = -0.51 is .1950.
Prob(x > 43,000) = .5000 + .1950 = .7224 = 69.50%
Over 69.50% of Mercedes dealers would be priced out of competition with BMW 3 Series Coupe 335i
market.

b.) Prob (x > 44,520 | μ = 39,368 and σ = 2367):


Z = (44520-39,368)/2,367 = 2.18
From Table A.5, the area for z = 2.18 is .4854.
Prob(x > 44,520) = .5000 – .4854 = .0001 = 0.01%
Virtually none of the BMW dealers are pricing the 335i more than the average price of the Mercedes
CLK350.
c.) Prob(x < 39,368 | μ = 44,520 and σ = 2981):
Z = (39,368-44,520)/2,981 = -1.73
From Table A.5, the area for z = -1.73 is .4582.
Prob (x < 39,368) = .5000 – .4582 = .0042 = 0.42%
About .4% of the Mercedes dealers are pricing CLK350 less than the average price of the BMW 335i.

d.) Prob (x < 39,368 | μ = 43,000 and σ = 2981):


Z = (39,368-43,000)/2,981= -1.93
From Table A.5, the area for z = -1.22 is .3888.
Prob (x < 39,368) = .5000 – .3888 = .0268 = 1.11%
Only 1% of the Mercedes dealers price the CLK320 less than $39,368.
Conclusion: There is little overlap in the prices of the two cars and it could be concluded that they are
not really competing with each other pricewise.

2. Suppose that highway gas mileage rates for both of these cares are uniformly distributed over a range
of from 20 to 30 mpg. What proportion of these cars would fall into the 22 to 27 mpg range? Compute
the proportion of cars that get more than 28 mpg. What proportion of cars would get less than 23 mpg?

Answer:
a = 20; b = 30; x1 = 22; x2 = 27
Prob. = (27-22) / (30-20) = .5
50% of these cars would fall into the 22 to 27 mpg range.

Prob (x > 28 mpg) = (30-28) / (30-20) = .2


20% of cars get more than 28 mpg.

Prob (x < 23 mpg) = (30-23) / (30-20) = .7


70% of cards would get less than 23 mpg.

3. Suppose that in one dealership an average of 1.37 CLKs is sold every 3 hours (during a 12-hour
showroom day) and that sales are Poisson distributed. The following Excel-produced probabilities
indicate the occurrence of different intersales times based on this information. Study the output and
interpret it for the salespeople. For example, what is the probability that less than an hour will elapse
between sales? What is the probability that more than a day (12-hour day) will pass before the next sale
after a car has been sold? What can the dealership managers do with such information? How can it help
in staffing? How can such information be used as a tracking device for the impact of advertising? Is there
a chance that these probabilities would change during the year? If so, why?
Answer:
= 1.37 cars/3 hours, = 1/1.37 = .73 of 3 hours = 2.19 hours
For 1 hour:
1 hour = .333 of 3 hours. x 0 = 0.333. The cumulative probability of this time interval is .3663. This means
that there is a 36.63% chance that there will be less than one hour between sales.

For 12 hours:
12 hours = 4 times 3 hours. x0 = 4. The cumulative probability for this time interval is .9958 meaning that
there is a 99.58% chance that there will be less than 12 hours between sales. The complement of this is
that there is a 1 - .9958 = .0042 = 0.42% chance that there will be more than 12 hours between sales.

Managers know that there is an almost 37% chance of a sale within every hour. They need to determine
how much staffing it takes to sell a car every hour or less. Given that it takes several potential buyers
and often multiple visits to the dealership to sell one car and that it is relatively likely (probability almost
75%) that they will close a sale every 3hours ( x0 = 1), the dealership should never go without having
salespeople around and may have to have several employees around all the time.

By having good exponential and Poisson distribution data, one can, to some extent, track the impact of
advertising on sales by testing values of using random arrival data in time periods following
advertising to determine if has increased. For example, if = 1.37 every 3 hours but following an
advertising campaign, there is a randomly selected 3 hours period and 5 cars are sold, then
management might be able to statistically justify that the has increased and then conclude that the
advertising campaign was the cause.

These probabilities may change during the year because the value of lambda changes with time of day,
day of the week, and season of the year. In particular in the car business, there may be an increase in
sales on the weekend, in the evening, or perhaps in the Christmas season when people receive their
bonuses and when new models arrive. As the lambda changes, the probabilities will also likely change.

You might also like