Professional Documents
Culture Documents
LAB 8 - Compaction - LEVEL 2 - AINUR NASUHA BINTI MOHAMMAD RODZI-2019892466
LAB 8 - Compaction - LEVEL 2 - AINUR NASUHA BINTI MOHAMMAD RODZI-2019892466
COURSE NAME
COURSE CODE
OPEN-ENDED LAB
SEMESTER
MARKS COMMENTS
INTRODUCTION
BASIC CONCEPTS
METHODOLOGY 1 2 3 4 5
RESULTS&ANALYSIS 1 2 3 4 5
DISCUSSION 1 2 3 4 5
CONCLUSION 1 2 3 4 5
ORGANIZATION 1 2 3 4 5
TOTAL MARKS
ENGINEERING PROPERTIES
COMPACTION
(With referenced to clause 7 of BS1377: Part 7: 1990)
PREAMBLE
Introduction
Objectives
1. To determine the optimal water content at which the soil sample can
reach its maximum dry density.
Learning Outcomes
Procedure
1.The compaction mold was set to the base plate without the removable collar
and weighed.
2.Then the removable collar was attached.
3.Around 3kg representative specimen of the air dried soil Around 3kg
representative specimen of the air dried soil sample was obtained and all the
lumps sample was obtained and all the lumps were broken.
4.The soil passed through no.4 sieve was collected to a tray.
5.Water was added to the soil and mixed thoroughly to get a homogeneous soil
sample. The test was started with a water content lower than the optimum.
6.The mold assembly was placed on the ground and soil was added to the mold so
that it was about half full
7.The soil was compacted by applying 25 blows of the rammer dropping from the
controlled height of 300mm and ensured a uniform distribution of blows.
8.A second approximately equal layer of soil was placed in the mold and
compacted it with 25 blows as before.
9.Procedure was repeated with a third layer, which should bring the compacted
soil level in the extension collar to about 6mm above the level of the mold body.
10.Extension collar was removed carefully. The excess soil was cut and leveled off
to the top of the mold. The small cavities resulting from the removal of stones
were filled with fine materials.
11.Excess soil on the base plate was removed carefully using a brush and weighed
Table 1 shows the recorded mass and dimensions of the cylindrical mold that was
used for the computation for its volume as shown in Equation 1:
1
V mold = π d 2 h Equation 1
4
RESULTS Table 2 presents the data on the masses of the mold after the addition and
compaction of the soil. Note that the mass of the empty mold is 3.5145 kg.
Table 2: Mass of the Soil Sample inside the mold in each trial
Trial Mass of Mold + Soil, kg Mass of Soil, kg
1 5.0945 1.58
2 5.1315 1.62
3 5.2215 1.71
4 5.2740 1.76
5 5.3270 1.81
6 5.3140 1.80
7 5.2930 1.78
The moisture content of the soil sample in each of the trials is determined using
Equation 2:
M w+ M d Equation 2
w= x 100
Mw
Table 3 presents the data used in order to determine the moisture content of each
trial using Equation 2.
Next is to present the moist (total) and dry density, and dry unit weight of the
compacted soil in each trial. First to calculate the total density, Equation 3 is used:
M❑
ρm = Equation 3
v
The dry density of the compacted soil sample can be computed using Equation 4:
❑d
❑b= Equation 4
(1+ w)
Table 6 contains all the computed values for the computed dry unit weight of all
the trials.
The compaction curve is then generated by plotting the dry unit weight versus the
moisture content graph as shown in Table 7.
DATA ANALYSIS
From the graph ,we concluded that the maximum dry unit weight of 1641.69
kN/m3 can be achieved using 9.00% moisture content.
By analzing graph ,we could determine that the best to achieve 9% moisture
content in order to attain the highest compaction of soil possible.