Professional Documents
Culture Documents
JR 2 4
JR 2 4
a Sydney Institute for Women, Children and Their Families, Sydney Local Health District, Sydney, NSW, Australia;
b Monash
IVF-Sydney Ultrasound for Women, Sydney, NSW, Australia; c Discipline of Obstetrics, Gynaecology and
Neonatology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia; d Department of Obstetrics and
Gynaecology, University Malaya Medical Centre, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia;
e Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark; f Department of Biomedicine, Aarhus
University, Aarhus, Denmark; g Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus,
www.karger.com/fdt
Downloaded by:
Values are n total n (%) unless otherwise indicated. TTTS, twin-twin transfusion syndrome; IUGR, intrauter-
ine growth restriction; CRL, crown-rump length; NT, nuchal translucency; DV, ductus venosus; PIV, pulsatility
index for veins.
4
0.3
10
CRL difference
DV difference
NT difference
3
0.2
2
5
0.1
1
0 0 0
No TTTS TTTS No TTTS TTTS No TTTS TTTS
CRL difference NT difference DV difference
Fig. 1. Discordance between markers in normal pregnancies and cohort affected by TTTS. TTTS, twin-twin trans-
fusion syndrome; CRL, crown-rump length; NT, nuchal translucency; DV, ductus venosus.
0.75
0.75
0.50 0.50
0.25 0.25
0 0
Fig. 2. NT, DV and CRL to predict TTTS. TTTS, twin-twin trans- Fig. 3. NT, DV and CRL to predict sIUGR. sIUGR, selective intra-
fusion syndrome; CRL, crown-rump length; NT, nuchal translu- uterine growth restriction; CRL, crown-rump length; NT, nuchal
cency; DV, ductus venosus. translucency; DV, ductus venosus.
Kagan et al. [11] found that a >20% discordance in NT with differential growth in twins. However, similar to
was associated with 50% detection of TTTS for a 20% other authors [23], we did not find a meaningful associa-
false-positive rate. In our series, the sensitivity and speci- tion between first-trimester CRL discordance and subse-
ficity of NT discordance (>20%) were 88% (8/9 cases) and quent development of sIUGR in this study.
71% (40/56 cases), respectively. There was evidence that The data did not establish any association between ab-
NT discordance was more marked in those cases with an sence/reversal of the “A” wave of the DV and TTTS; this
early diagnosis (2/3 cases) than in those cases (0/6) that contrasts to previous reports of a 75% sensitivity and 92%
were diagnosed after 18 weeks. If a therapy was developed specificity [13, 14]. We also analysed the DV data in terms
that allowed for chorioangiopagus vessels to be function- of the PIV. Whilst there were more cases (20%) with DV
ally separated in the early part of the second trimester [8, PIV discordance in our series (Table 2), the prevalence
9], then NT discordance >20% would be an effective tool was similar in control and adverse outcome pregnancies.
for defining a cohort who should be offered treatment. An association between TTTS and tricuspid valve flow
However, as 2 out of every 3 pregnancies treated would has not previously been reported. Although the preva-
have been treated on the basis of a false-positive result, lence of TR is slightly higher in the TTTS group, the num-
the intervention would need to carry minimal procedure- bers are too small to draw any conclusions. Importantly,
related risk. in 8/9 pregnancies complicated by TTTS, TR was not ob-
The data attempting to relate CRL discordance in served on assessment at approximately 12 weeks’ gesta-
MCDA twins with subsequent development of TTTS is tion.
conflicting. Similar to the findings of Sebire et al. [22], we Although the Quintero staging system identifies hae-
did not find a meaningful relationship between CRL dis- modynamic changes relatively late in the course of TTTS
cordance and TTTS. This is not surprising given the un- (associated with stage 3 disease), other groups have shown
likely biological link between TTTS (a haemodynamic that significant haemodynamic changes can be demon-
problem) and abnormal CRL. Of greater biological plau- strated from earlier time points – if they are actively
sibility is the possibility that a significant difference in sought during cardiac evaluation. Rychik et al. [24] in a
placenta territory could be anticipated to be associated retrospective review of 150 MCDA twins with TTTS
193.51.85.197 - 1/22/2020 8:31:18 PM
References
1 Sebire NJ, Snijders RJ, Hughes K, Sepulveda 3 Ghalili A, McLennan A, Pedersen L, Kesby G, 6 Committee on Practice Bulletins–Obstetrics;
W, Nicolaides KH. The hidden mortality of Hyett J. Outcomes of monochorionic diamni- Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine. Practice
monochorionic twin pregnancies. Br J Obstet otic twin pregnancies: a comparison of assist- Bulletin No. 169: Multifetal Gestations: Twin,
Gynaecol. 1997 Oct;104(10):1203–7. ed and spontaneous conceptions. Aust N Z J Triplet, and Higher-Order Multifetal Preg-
2 Nakayama S, Ishii K, Kawaguchi H, Hayashi Obstet Gynaecol. 2013 Oct;53(5):437–42. nancies. Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Oct;
S, Hidaka N, Murakoshi T, et al. Perinatal out- 4 Oldenburg A, Rode L, Bødker B, Ersbak V, 128(4):e131–46.
come of monochorionic diamniotic twin Holmskov A, Jørgensen FS, et al. Influence of 7 RANZCOG. Management of monochorionic
pregnancies managed from early gestation at chorionicity on perinatal outcome in a large twin pregnancy. July 2014.
a single center. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2012 cohort of Danish twin pregnancies. Ultra-
Apr;38(4):692–7. sound Obstet Gynecol. 2012 Jan;39(1):69–74.
5 RCOG Guidelines: Monochorionic Twin
Pregnancy, Management (Green-top Guide-
line No. 51). Published: 2016 Nov 16.
193.51.85.197 - 1/22/2020 8:31:18 PM