Professional Documents
Culture Documents
How To Debate
How To Debate
How To Debate
Characteristics of a debate
In the event that there is a moderator, it is to rectify the order that has
been agreed, especially in public debates.
Public debates are generally of a political or philosophical-social order
and in these they can directly infer the public and in these there may
be attendees who observe the same but without participating.
In the public debate, the moderator explains the topic of the debate,
and indicates who starts the dissertation and who should respond.
Emulator form, in the political debates the question and answer table
has been established, which resembles a press conference.
This point is a for you to know what things do you need to know before
the debate, what type of information do you need to learn for the
debate and the type of information you should have to be very prepare
to the debate
You´ll need the general details of the topic that you'll be expected to
debate, but in particular, you should take note of specific information
and figures you might use. This will help your coherence appeal in your
arguments, as statistics or studios can have a biggest impact over the
audience and can be difficult to refute.
Once you have decided on your argument and the material you will
use in it, you will need to write the speech you will use during the
debate. Depending on the kind of debate and the rules your debate
chapter, these can differ significantly, though every debate should
have:
You didn´t need to learn or your speech and position, you need to
learn main points and key words, this will help you the get vital
information. Additionally, memorization will put information vital to your
argument/counterargument at your disposal. Demonstrating your quick
wit can earn you points with your judges and put you ahead of your
opponents.
While constructing your argument, you should take weak points into
consideration, as these will likely be used by your opposition. Beyond
that, what are the best arguments you can think to use for the opposing
argument? Keep this in mind, and think of specific ways you can
question or undermine the validity of these arguments.
Prove that the problem solved by the motion does not exist.
Prove that the motion proposed does not solve the problem.
Prove that the motion is not the appropriate way to solve the
problem and/or that the plan proposed brings more negative
consequences than benefits.
To finish here are other types that could help you
1. Research, print your information
2. Actively participate
3. Public speaking, rhetorical questions