Professional Documents
Culture Documents
GED102 Week 9 WGN - JINGONA
GED102 Week 9 WGN - JINGONA
GED102 Week 9 WGN - JINGONA
Noteboo
k in
GED10
Task List
2
T h e l e s s o n f
concerned about the equitable distribution of
V
matics
o t i n
wherein
g
a group
i
can
s
choose
a
leaders or
t o
approve/disapprove proposals.
Modern
World)
FIRST QUARTER, SY2020-2021 GED 102 WEEK 9
Lesson 1. Apportionment
Highlights
A. What is Apportionment?
Apportionment involves dividing something up, just like fair division. In fair
division we are dividing objects among people while in apportionment we are
dividing people among places. Also like fair division, the apportionment
processes that are widely used do not always give the best answer, and
apportionment is still an open field of mathematics.
FIRST QUARTER, SY2020-2021 GED 102 WEEK 9
The Hamilton/Vinton Method sets the divisor as the proportion of the total
population per house seat. After each state's population is divided by the divisor,
the whole number of the quotient is kept and the fraction dropped. This will
result in surplus house seats. The first surplus seat is assigned to the state with
the largest fraction after the original division. The next is assigned to the state
with the second-largest fraction and so on.
In mathematics and political science, the quota rule describes a desired property
of a proportional apportionment or election method. It states that the number of
seats that should be allocated to a given party should be between the upper or
lower roundings (called upper and lower quotas) of its fractional proportional
share (called natural quota). As an example, if a party deserves 10.56 seats out
of 15, the quota rule states that when the seats are allotted, the party may get
10 or 11 seats, but not lower or higher. Many common election methods, such
as all highest averages methods, violate the quota rule.
• Majority
• Plurality
• Borda Count
• Top-Two Runoff
• Approval Voting
• Pairwise Comparison
Highlights
The Banzhaf power index, named after John F. Banzhaf III (originally invented
by Lionel Penrose in 1946 and sometimes called Penrose–Banzhaf index; also
known as the Banzhaf–Coleman index after James Samuel Coleman), is a power
index defined by the probability of changing an outcome of a vote where voting
rights are not necessarily equally divided among the voters or shareholders.
To calculate the power of a voter using the Banzhaf index, list all the winning
coalitions, then count the critical voters. A critical voter is a voter who, if he
changed his vote from yes to no, would cause the measure to fail. A voter's
power is measured as the fraction of all swing votes that he could cast. There
are some algorithms for calculating the power index, e.g., dynamic
programming techniques, enumeration methods and Monte Carlo methods.