Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 5

See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.

net/publication/236495916

Amylase production from the yeast Saccharomycopsis fibuligera and its potency
for glucose production from raw starch

Conference Paper · October 2008

CITATIONS READS

2 1,410

5 authors, including:

Safri Ishmayana Dian S. Kamara


Universitas Padjadjaran Universitas Padjadjaran
64 PUBLICATIONS   134 CITATIONS    11 PUBLICATIONS   18 CITATIONS   

SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE

Saadah D. Rachman Idar Kardi


Universitas Padjadjaran Universitas Padjadjaran
30 PUBLICATIONS   88 CITATIONS    9 PUBLICATIONS   49 CITATIONS   

SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE

Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:

Resistance and Enzim Activity of Spodoptera litura from Karangpawitan and Lembang subdistrict to chlorpyrifos and their sensitivity to the formulation of Azadirachta
indica and Cymbopogon nardus oil View project

Recombinant Human Serum Albumin View project

All content following this page was uploaded by Safri Ishmayana on 21 May 2014.

The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file.


S. Ishmayana et al. Proceeding of The International Seminar on Chemistry 2008 (pp. 688-691)
ISBN 978-979-18962-0-7 Jatinangor, 30-31 October 2008

Amylase production from the yeast Saccharomycopsis fibuligera and


its potency for glucose production from raw starch

Safri Ishmayana*, Dian S. Kamara, Saadah D. Rachman,


Idar Kardi, Muhammad Fadhlillah
Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Universitas Padjadjaran
Jl. Raya Bandung-Sumedang km. 21 Jatinangor 45363 Sumedang, West Java, Indonesia
*e-mail: ishmayana@unpad.ac.id

Abstract

Raw starch digesting amylolytic enzyme is a potential enzyme that can be used in bioethanol
production, since it can save energy requirement of starch processing. S. fibuligera R-64 produces
two types of amylolytic enzyme, i.e. α-amylase and glucoamylase, which are capable to digest raw
starch. This research is aimed to investigate the effect of different carbon sources on amylase
production by the yeast S. fibuligera and to investigate the enzyme ability in digesting raw starches.
The media that used for enzyme production media were 1% of yeast extract and 1% of raw starch
(sago, corn, cassava, and rice). The media was shaked (180 rpm) in room temperature for 72 hours.
The crude extract was used for digesting raw starches. The crude extract was added to 5% (w/v) raw
starch solution in 25 mM phosphate-citrate buffer pH 5.8. The mixture was then shaked in room
temperature for 24 hours. After 24 hours, the sample was taken, and the reducing sugar was
determined using colorimetric method using alkaline potassium ferry cyanide reagent. The results
showed that sago is the best carbon source, which gave the highest amylolytic activity (305.77
units/mg). We also found that sago was the easiest starch digested by the enzyme, followed by rice,
corn and cassava.

Keywords: amylase, glucose, raw starch, Saccharomycopsis fibuligera

Introduction other only produces one of the enzyme (Hostinova,


2002).
In recent years, there are high demands for highly Our group has worked on S. fibuligera R-64 and
efficient starch processing. This type of processing previous studies showed that this strain produces
require starch acting enzyme that has capability in glucoamylase and α-amylase. Interestingly, while
digesting raw starch (Hostinova, 2002). Raw starch glucoamylase highly adsorbed onto raw starch, the α-
digesting enzyme has important application in various amylase can digest raw starch without adsorption
industries, such as foods, beverages, textile, mechanism (Hasan et al., 2008).
pharmaceuticals and also bioethanol (Nigam & Singh, Optimizing of production of these enzyme need to
1995). be done. One of factors affecting the production of
Bioconversion of raw starch using raw starch enzyme is nutrient in growth medium (de Oliveira et
acting enzyme has been reported represent economical al., 2007). Previous studies showed that optimum
advantages compared to conventional process which nutrient concentration for amylase production by S.
uses pregelatinised starch as substrate. While fibuligera R-64 is 1% of starch and 1% of yeast
conventional process require high amount of energy extract (Soemitro et al., 1996). But, influence of
for gelatinization process, raw starch processing does different starches on amylase production has not been
not require this step for the hydrolysis process (van investigated. Therefore in present study, we
der Maarel, 2006). investigate the influence of different starches as
Therefore, exploration has been conducted to find carbon sources on amylolytic activity produced by the
amylolytic enzyme that highly active towards raw yeast.
starches. Many researchers found this type of enzyme, We also examine the effectiveness of the enzyme
and some of these types of enzyme have been well in hydrolyzing different type of raw starches.
studied (Hayashida et al., 1988; Hostinova et al.,
2003; Goyal et al., 2005).
S. fibuligera is a food borne yeast that has high
amylolytic activity. Previous studies showed that some
S. fibuligera strains produces two types of amylolytic
enzyme which are α-amylase and glucoamylase while

688
S. Ishmayana et al. Proceeding of The International Seminar on Chemistry 2008 (pp. 688-691)
Jatinangor, 30-31 October 2008

Materials and Methods Results and Discussion


Microorganism One of factors affecting enzyme production is
availability of nutrition in growth media, including
S. fibuligera is routinely grown at room temperature carbon source. However, carbon sources such as
for 48 hours on the agar plate contain 6% sucrose, dextrin, fructose, glucose, lactose, maltose and starch
1.5% bacto agar, and 10% tauge extract. are very expensive for commercial production of these
enzymes (Gupta et al., 2003). These expensive carbon
Production of the enzyme sources can be replaced in the medium with
The enzyme was produced, in the medium containing economically available agricultural by-products (de
1% starch (cassava, sago, rice and corn) and 1% yeast Oliveira et al., 2007; Abu et al., 2005). To investigate
extract as described by Ismaya et al. (2003), and the influence of different carbon source on the
cultivated for 3 days at room temperature. After amylase production, we examine some starch as
removal of cells by centrifugation at 4oC, the carbon source in relation to amylase production.
supernatant was used as crude extract of enzyme There were no significant differences of
which was used for hydrolyzing raw starch. extracellular protein produced by the yeast (Figure 1).
This finding is different with previously reported
Amylase activity assay finding (de Oliveira et al., 2007). Even though same
The enzyme activity was determined using Fuwa nitrogen source was used, de Oliveira et al. (2007)
(1951) method. Briefly, 100 µL of enzyme solution found that extracellular protein produced by the same
was added to 100 µL 0.1% soluble starch solution, rhizobia can differ significantly. However, this result
and incubated for 10 minutes in 50°C. Reaction was is very influenced by intrinsic properties of the
stopped by addition of 100 µL HCl 0.1 N. To microorganism. For S. fibuligera, it might be that total
visualize remaining starch in solution, 100 µL iodine extracellular protein production is highly affected by
solution was added and the total volume brought to 2 the nitrogen source in the media. This hypothesis
mL by water addition. The absorbance was recorded needs to be confirmed by more experimental data.
on 600 nm wavelength. To calculate unit activity of Figure 2 show the influence of different starches as
the enzyme, following equation was used: carbon source on amylase activity. High activity of
amylase (~305 units/mg) was found in the presence of
Ac - As 1 sago starch as sole carbon source, followed by rice
AU = × 10 × × f
Ac Ve (~210 units/mg), cassava (~127 units/mg) and maize
(~76 units/mg) (Figure 2). These differences also
Where : AU = Activity Units found in production of amylase by rhizobia (de
Ac = Control Absorbance Oliveira et al., 2007) and Bacillus strain (Aiyer,
As = Sample absorbance 2004). This finding suggests that the same behavior
Ve = Volume of enzyme used in assay also true for yeast.
f = dilution factor High activity of raw starch digesting enzymes is
desired for more economical process. Therefore we
Hydrolysis of raw starches examine the activity of our enzyme towards several
Hydrolysis of raw starch was conducted as described raw starches, namely corn, cassava, rice and sago.
by Hostinova et al. (2003) with slight modification. From the experiment, it can be suggested that sago
Raw starch (cassava, corn, rice and sago) suspension gave the highest glucose production (1935 µg/ g raw
was made with concentration of 5% (w/v) in starch), followed by rice (924µg/ g raw starch),
phosphate-citrate buffer pH 5.8 (25 mM). To 20 mL cassava (751 µg/ g raw starch), and maize (720 µg/ g
of the suspension 1 mL of crude enzyme extract (2000 raw starch) (Figure 3). This result have similar pattern
units/mL) was added. This mixture was than shaken as amylase activity, therefore high amylase production
(180 rpm) in room temperature for 24 hours. might be related to high digestability of the substrate
Reducing sugar after 24 hour of digestion was in the growth media.
determined using method described by Walker & The physicochemical properties of partially
Harmond (1994). hydrolyzed starch are interesting thing to be
elucidated. Different treatment during hydrolysis
Determination of reducing sugar process can influence the final product. Therefore,
To 1 mL of sample solution, 0.8 mL of alkaline ferry optimization for hydrolysis process and finally
cyanide (7.5 mM potassium ferry cyanide in 0.3 M products that formed during hydrolysis also still needs
sodium carbonate) was added. The mixture was than to be investigated.
heated for 10 minutes. After cooling, 4 mL of water
was added and the absorbance at 420 nm was
recorded.

689
S. Ishmayana et al. Proceeding of The International Seminar on Chemistry 2008 (pp. 688-691)
Jatinangor, 30-31 October 2008

Protein Concentration (mg/mL)


4

0
Sago Cassava Rice Maize
Type of Carbon Source

Figure 1 Extracellular protein produced by the yeast S. fibuligera R-64 in growth media composed of 1% starch
and 1% yeast extract

350.00
Specific Activity (Units/mg)

300.00

250.00

200.00

150.00

100.00

50.00

0.00
Sago Cassava Rice Maize
Type of Carbon Source

Figure 2 Amylase production by the yeast produced by the yeast S. fibuligera R-64 in growth media composed of
1% starch and 1% yeast extract

2500
Glucose Production (µg/g)

2000

1500

1000

500

0
Sago Cassava Rice Maize
Type of Raw Starch

Figure 3 Glucose produced using crude extract of amylase produced by S. fibuligera R-64

690
S. Ishmayana et al. Proceeding of The International Seminar on Chemistry 2008 (pp. 688-691)
Jatinangor, 30-31 October 2008

Conclusions Hostinova E., Solovicova A., Dvorsky R. &


Gasperik J. 2003. Molecular cloning and 3D
S. fibuligera R-64 produces high activity of structure prediction of the first raw-starch-
amylase in the presence of sago starch as sole degrading glucoamylase without a separate
carbon source in the growth medium. The amylase starch binding domain. Arch. Biochem.
can be used for direct glucose production from raw Biophys. 411: 189–195.
starch. However, efforts still need to be done for Hostinova, E. 2002. Amylolytic enzymes produced
optimizing the process for higher yield of enzyme by the yeast Saccharomycopsis fibuligera.
activity by modification of growth media or genetic Biologia, Bratislava. 57/Suppl. 11: 247-251.
engineering of the enzyme. Ismaya, W. T., Setiana, T., Natalia, D. & Soemitro,
S. 2003. Peningkatan kestabilan amilase
melalui rekayasa protein. Laporan Hibah
Acknowledgements Bersaing IX. Departemen Pendidikan Nasional.
Jakarta.
This research is funded by DIPA Universitas Nigam, P. & Singh, D. 1995. Enzymes and
Padjadjaran budget year 2007 based on contract microbial system involved in starch processing.
No. 251D/JO6.14.LP/PL/2007. Therefore we are Enzyme Microbiol. Technol., 17, 770-778.
very grateful to research institute of Universitas Soemitro, S., Bahti, H. H., Adi, T. P., Thaurhesia,
Padjadjaran. S., Hardjito, L., Niloperbowo, W. & Wenten I.
G. 1996. Produksi enzim pemecah pati.
Laporan RUT I. Kementrian Riset dan
References Teknologi.
van der Maarel, M.J.E.C. 2006. Bioethanol
Abu, E.A., Ado, S.A. & James, D.B. 2005. Raw production from starch and cellulose. The
starch degrading amylase production by mixed Gruber Soedigdo Lecture. ITB Bandung 20
culture of Aspergillus niger and June 2006.
Saccharomyces cerevisae grown on sorghum Walker, J.A. & Harmon, D.L.. 1996. Technical
pomace. Afr. J. Biotechnol. 4: 785-790. note: a simple, rapid assay for α-amylase in
Aiyer, P.V.D. 2004. Effect of C:N ratio on alpha bovine pancreatic juice. J. Anim. Sci. 74:658-
amylase production by Bacillus licheniformis 662.
SPT 27. Afr. J. Biotechnol. 3 : 519-522.
de Oliveira, A.N., de Oliveira, L.A., Andrade, J.S.
& Chagas Junior, A.F. 2007. Rhizobia amylase
production using various starchy substances as
carbon substrates. Braz. J. Microbiol. 38:208-
216.
Fuwa, H., 1951. A new method for micro
determinations of α-amylase activity by the use
of amylose as substrate. J. Biochem. 41: 583-
603.
Goyal, N., Gupta, J. K. & Soni, S. K. 2005. A novel
raw-starch digesting thermostable α-amylase
from Bacillus sp. I-3 and its use in the direct
hydrolysis of raw potato starch. Enz. Microb.
Technol. 37:723-734.
Gupta, R., Gigras, P., Mohapatra, H., Goswami,
V.K., & Chauhan, B. (2003). Microbial α-
amylases: a biotechnological perspective.
Process Biotechem., 38, 1599-1616.
Hasan, K., Ismaya, W.T., Kardi I., Andiyana Y.,
Kusumawidjaya S., Ishmayana, S., Subroto, T.,
& Soemitro, S. 2008. Proteolysis of α-amylase
from Saccharomycopsis fibuligera:
characterization of digestion products.
Biologia. 63: 1044 – 1050.
Hayashida, S., Teramoto, Y. & Inoue, T. 1988.
Production and characteristics of raw potato
starch digesting α-amylase from Bacillus
subtilis 65. App. Envir. Microb. 54:1516-1522.

691

View publication stats

You might also like