Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Assnment Quality Issues in Education
Assnment Quality Issues in Education
Lack of Resources
Resources are not being utilized properly due to presence of unskilled, dishonest and less
educated administration. But the problem is that we are not taking benefits of available
resources.
Three kinds of resource are necessary for delivery of quality formal and non-formal primary
education programs: Human resources, Material resources and financial resources. These are
defined below.
Human resources
There is a full range of human resources that are essential for success. These resources include
planners, administrators, teachers, mentors, managers, and support staff. Here, we focus on
teachers as one of the critical aspects of human resource commitment.
Material resources
Both the availability and quality of materials can be barriers to a quality education. In many
countries there are insufficient basic materials such as blackboards and chalk, textbooks, teacher
support materials, student workbooks, and supplementary learning aids. They may be
unavailable due to lack of financial resources to publish and transport them, lack of human
resources to develop them and/or make them appropriate, and or due to geographical barriers that
make delivery untimely or impossible.
Financial resources
The most important source of financing for education comes from sources within
country/domestic sources. The majority of OOSC live in economically poor countries. In recent
years, these countries have suffered further from the impact of the global economic crisis. Even
in many of those countries where the domestic spending on education is a significant and
respectable percentage of GDP, the actual amount of money available is insufficient to provide a
quality education to those children who are in school, let alone those who are excluded.
2. Accountability
Accountability has been an educational issue for as long as people have had to pay for and
govern schools. The term covers a diverse array of means by which some broad entity requires
some providers of education to give an account of their work and holds them responsible for
their performance.
3. Learning environment
Learning environment should be healthy, secure, protective, inspiring and adapted for both girls
and boys. Inclusive environment should be provided to minorities or pupils with disabilities.
Teachers cooperate to ensure a sound learning environment. School should be welcoming place
to the surrounding community.
4. Different curriculum
The education system of Pakistan is based on unequal lines. Curriculum is different in both
public and private sector. This creates a sort of disparity among people, divide them into two
segments. When curriculum is not equal for all then achieve the quality of education impossible,
curriculum difference create gap among the people.
5. Fewer budgets
Budgeting is a process whereby future income and expenditure are decided in order to streamline
the expenditure process. Budgeting is done in order to keep track of the expenditures and
income. It begins by deciding upon the financial goals according to which the budget will be
made.
A school that’s not granted adequate funding and has no clear guidelines will not be able
to ensure quality education.
The allocation of funds for education very low.
It is only 1.5 to 2.0 percent of the total GDP.
It should be around 7 percent of the total GDP.
6. Untrained teacher
Quality education depends upon quality teacher.
The teacher in the government school is not well trained.
People who do not get job in any sector ,they try their luck in education system,
They are not professionally trained teachers ,they hurdle to assess quality education
7. Poverty
Poverty is also another factor that restricts the parents to send their children to public or private
schools. So, they prefer to send their children to madrassas where education is totally free.
Student poverty is a growing problem. Data from the National Center for Education Statistics
shows that as of the 2014-2015 school year, low-income students comprised a majority (52
percent) of public school students in the U.S. That represented a significant increase from 2000-
2001, when only 38 percent of students were considered low-income (meaning they qualified for
free or discounted school lunches). Low-income students tend to perform worse in school than
their more affluent peers. Studies have shown that family income strongly correlates to student
achievement on standardized tests. That may be partly because parents with fewer financial
resources generally can't afford tutoring and other enrichment experiences that can boost student
achievement. In addition, low-income children are much more likely to experience food
instability, family turmoil, and other stressors that can negatively affect their academic success