The accused-appellants attacked and killed Gerardo Longasa along with six other armed men. The trial court found the accused-appellants guilty of murder without appreciating treachery. The Supreme Court ruled that treachery was present because Gerardo was unarmed and his arms were held behind him, making it impossible for him to defend himself against the attack. The Court also ruled that superior strength was absorbed by treachery and should not be considered a separate aggravating circumstance. The crime committed was murder with the aggravating circumstance of treachery.
Original Description:
case digest, criminal law
Original Title
People v Villonez G.R. Nos. 122976-77 November 16, 1998
The accused-appellants attacked and killed Gerardo Longasa along with six other armed men. The trial court found the accused-appellants guilty of murder without appreciating treachery. The Supreme Court ruled that treachery was present because Gerardo was unarmed and his arms were held behind him, making it impossible for him to defend himself against the attack. The Court also ruled that superior strength was absorbed by treachery and should not be considered a separate aggravating circumstance. The crime committed was murder with the aggravating circumstance of treachery.
The accused-appellants attacked and killed Gerardo Longasa along with six other armed men. The trial court found the accused-appellants guilty of murder without appreciating treachery. The Supreme Court ruled that treachery was present because Gerardo was unarmed and his arms were held behind him, making it impossible for him to defend himself against the attack. The Court also ruled that superior strength was absorbed by treachery and should not be considered a separate aggravating circumstance. The crime committed was murder with the aggravating circumstance of treachery.
People v Villonez G.R. Nos. 122976-77 November 16, 1998
Facts On May 3, 1994, Gerardo Longasa, the deceased, had a fistfight with Rudy Santos at Liwayway street, Baritan, Malabon. Edgar Jimenez, the witness, went to the area to stop the fistfight. Edgar passed at Javier II street going to Liwayway street. At Javier II street, Edgar was attacked by seven armed men, which included the accused-appellants. Edgar was able to escape from his assailants. While fleeing, Edgar ran past Gerardo, who seemed drunk. Edgar called Gerardo but the assailants already attacked Gerardo. Edgar saw Emerlito hit Gerardo with a 2x2 inches piece of wood while Regando and Ruel simultaneously hit Gerardo with bottles. Rey and Buddha held Gerardo’s arms while Rudy and Eddie Santos stabbed Gerardo, which caused his death. The RTC held that the accused-appellants were guilty beyond reasonable doubt of the crime of murder without appreciating treachery because the deceased was already engaged in a fistfight prior the attack, thus he was forewarned. The aggravating circumstance, superior of strength, was appreciated for the assailants had the upper hand, which was strength in number. Issue Whether or not the aggravating circumstance, treachery, should be appreciated. Whether or not the aggravating circumstance, superior of strength, should be appreciated. Held Yes. Treachery should be appreciated. No. superior of strength should not be appreciated. Ruling Treachery may still be appreciated even when the victim was forewarned of an attack against him. What is decisive is that the execution of the attack made it impossible for the victim to defend himself or to retaliate. The fact that the victim was unarmed and his arms were held behind him preclude the possibility of any defense by him. The other aggravating circumstance, superior of strength, will no longer be taken against the accused-appellants for it is absorbed in treachery. Hence, the crime committed was murder with the aggravating circumstance of treachery.
CaseDigest☺
G.R. No. 189328 February 21,2011
PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES vs. ARNOLD PELIS
G.R. No. 191721 January 12, 2011
PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES vs. ROGELIO DOLORIDO y ESTRADA
G.R. No. 181701 January 18, 2012
PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES vs. EDUARDO DOLLENDO AND NESTOR MEDICE, NESTOR MEDICE