International Journal of Manpower

Work values and commitment

Dov Elizur
Article information:
To cite this document:
Dov Elizur, (1996),"Work values and commitment ", International Journal of Manpower, Vol. 17 Iss 3 pp. 25 - 30
Permanent link to this document:
http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/01437729610119496
Downloaded on: 31 January 2016, At: 13:58 (PT)
References: this document contains references to 36 other documents.
To copy this document: permissions@emeraldinsight.com
The fulltext of this document has been downloaded 4958 times since 2006*
Users who downloaded this article also downloaded:
Dov Elizur, Meni Koslowsky, (2001),"Values and organizational commitment", International Journal of Manpower, Vol. 22 Iss
7 pp. 593-599 http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/01437720110408967
Downloaded by Middle East Technical University At 13:58 31 January 2016 (PT)

David L. Stum, (2001),"Maslow revisited: building the employee commitment pyramid", Strategy & Leadership, Vol. 29
Iss 4 pp. 4-9 http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/10878570110400053
Wim J. Nijhof, Margriet J. de Jong, Gijs Beukhof, (1998),"Employee commitment in changing organizations: an exploration",
Journal of European Industrial Training, Vol. 22 Iss 6 pp. 243-248 http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/03090599810224701

Access to this document was granted through an Emerald subscription provided by emerald-srm:195450 []
For Authors
If you would like to write for this, or any other Emerald publication, then please use our Emerald for Authors service
information about how to choose which publication to write for and submission guidelines are available for all. Please
visit www.emeraldinsight.com/authors for more information.
About Emerald www.emeraldinsight.com
Emerald is a global publisher linking research and practice to the benefit of society. The company manages a portfolio of
more than 290 journals and over 2,350 books and book series volumes, as well as providing an extensive range of online
products and additional customer resources and services.
Emerald is both COUNTER 4 and TRANSFER compliant. The organization is a partner of the Committee on Publication
Ethics (COPE) and also works with Portico and the LOCKSS initiative for digital archive preservation.

*Related content and download information correct at time of download.

 Work values and
Work values and commitment
commitment
Dov Elizur
School of Business, Bar-Ilan University, 25
Ramat-Gan, Israel

Introduction
Downloaded by Middle East Technical University At 13:58 31 January 2016 (PT)

Two parallel areas of research have been of particular interest in the

organizational literature in recent years: the study of work values and the
analysis of commitment in its various forms. Although the type of data
collected in both types of research are naturally similar, as both ask subjects to
respond to questionnaire items which assess either attitudes or values, little
effort has been made to analyse the relationship between them. The purpose of
the present study was to analyse the relationship between the two concepts.
There has been growing interest, in recent years, in the analysis of human
values in general (Braithwaite and Law, 1987; Levy, 1990; Rokeach, 1979;
Shwartz and Bilsky, 1990) and of work values specifically (Elizur, 1984; Elizur
et al., 1991; Furnahm, 1984). Extensive empirical attention has been devoted to
typology and measurement of values (Borg, 1986; Elizur et al., 1991), to the
dynamics of value priorities such as stability and change (Elizur et al., 1991;
Furham, 1984) and to the relationship between values and attitudes, goals and
behaviour (Guttman, 1982; Levy and Guttman, 1976; Rokeach, 1973).
Some authors suggest a distinction between values and attitudes (Rokeach,
1973), while Levy and Guttman (1976) consider values as a subset of attitudes
with an emphasis on the concept of importance.
Various definitions of work values as a unique concept have been suggested.
According to Pennings (1970), for instance, work-value systems can be defined
as constellations of attitudes and opinions with which individuals evaluate their
jobs and work environments. Herzberg et al. (1956) considered work values as
representing motivational aspects, i.e. motivators and hygiene. Other authors
consider work values as representing Protestant work ethics (e.g. Furnham,
1984).
According to Levy and Guttman’s (1976) definition of values, an item belongs
to the universe of work values if its domain asks for an assessment of the
importance of a goal or behaviour in the work context and the range is ordered
from very important to very unimportant.
The formal approach of facet analysis (Elizur, 1984; Elizur and Guttman,
1976; Guttman, 1959; Shye and Elizur, 1994) as applied to work values was
studied here. Facet analysis attempts to define the universe of observations International Journal of Manpower,
formally and test hypotheses about the relationship between the definitional Vol. 17 No. 3, 1996, pp. 25-30.
© MCB University Press,
framework and the structure of the empirical observations. 0143-7720
 International Defining the work values domain
Journal of In order to analyse the work values domain systematically, an attempt was
Manpower made to define its essential facets. Two basic facets were distinguished:
modality of outcome and system performance contingency.
17,3
Facet A. Modality of outcome
26 Various work outcomes are of a material nature. Some of them can be directly
applied (such as pay), others have direct practical consequences (such as
benefits, hours of work, work conditions, etc.). This class of outcomes can be
defined as material, or instrumental, in a sense that they are concrete and of
practical use. It should be noted that the term “instrumental” is applied here in
Downloaded by Middle East Technical University At 13:58 31 January 2016 (PT)

a fashion similar to that used in many attitude studies (Elizur, 1970; Elizur and
Guttman, 1976) which can be contrasted with the meaning applied in theories of
work motivation (e.g. Graen, 1969; Vroom, 1964). The instrumentality of
outcomes refers here to the external nature of this class of outcomes rather than
the internal nature of the other modalities.
Although material outcomes are more salient, there exist various other
outcomes which are not of material nature. Most studies include items which
ask about relations with people, including colleagues, supervisor and others.
These items deal with interpersonal relations, and they are affective rather than
material.
An additional class of outcomes includes items such as interest, achievement,
responsibility and independence. These items may be classified as cognitive
rather than affective or instrumental.

Facet B. System-performance contingency

The second classification concerns system-performance contingency and can
be considered to cut across that of modality. Personnel managers recognize the
necessity of motivating individuals to join the organization and to attend to
work. For that purpose they provide various incentives which are usually given
before task performance and are not conditional on its outcome. These include
benefit plans, work conditions and various services such as transportation and
subsidized meals, as well as other resources provided by the organization. Katz
and Kahn (1966) refer to these as systems rewards, earned merely through
membership in the system. The term resources is suggested to characterize this
class of outcomes.

Commitment
Commitment, particularly in the area of work, has been analysed from several
perspectives (Martin and O’Laughlin, 1984; Morrow, 1983; Mowday et al., 1982).
It has served as both a dependent variable for antecedents such as age, tenure,
gender and education (Ferris and Aranya, 1983; Hunt et al., 1985; Luthans et al.,
1985), and as a predictor of various outcomes such as turnover (Rusbult and
Farrell, 1983), intention to leave (Ferris and Aranya, 1983) and absenteeism
(Ivancevich, 1985).
 One other type of analysis using commitment as the measure of interest has Work values and
been emphasized in the literature. This involves the distinction between moral commitment
commitment which focuses on attachment or loyalty (Porter and Lawler, 1968)
versus calculative commitment which emphasizes potential benefits derived
from the employees belonging to the organization (Hrebiniak and Alutto, 1972).
Findings reported by Ferris and Aranya (1983) and Wiener and Vardi (1980)
seem to indicate that the former is more predictive and stable than the latter. 27
Kidron (1978) found that work values were related more to moral than to
calculative commitment. According to these findings, the present study focused
on the moral dimension as the indicator of commitment.
Downloaded by Middle East Technical University At 13:58 31 January 2016 (PT)

Values and commitment

Several authors considered values in general and work values specifically as
important variables in explaining organizational commitment (Kidron, 1978;
Putti et al., 1989). According to Werkmeister (1967) commitment is a
manifestation of the individual’s own self, and reflects value standards that are
basic to the individual’s existence as a person. Some empirical support to this
view was provided in studies relating work values to commitment (Kidron, 1978).
In a study of central life interest, Dubin et al. (1975), found that workers with
a central life interest in work had a higher commitment to their work
organization compared to those with a different central life interest. Kidron
(1978) found a moderate relationship between work values and organizational
commitment. Putti et al. (1989) analysed the relationships between work values
and organizational commitment based on a sample of workers in Singapore.
Their findings indicate that intrinsic work values relate more closely to
organizational commitment than extrinsic work values.

Objectives and hypothesis

In summary, the main objective of the present study was to examine the
relationships between the various work values and commitment. It was
expected that commitment would correlate highest with cognitive items such as
job interest and independence and lowest with instrumental items such as pay,
benefits, etc. These distinctions should hold when commitment is considered a
measure of attitudes or loyalty, as was the case here.

Method
A group of 144 randomly chosen adults in Israel responded to a questionnaire
which contained 24 work values previously identified by Elizur (1984) and a
measure of commitment which asked the subject to rate from 1 (very great
extent) to 6 (very little extent) to the statement that “if a similar job were
suggested in another place, would you leave to take the offer?”

Results
The correlations between work values and commitment are shown in Table I.
The results indicate that moderate correlations were obtained between certain
 International Content Commitment
Journal of
Manpower Cognitive
17,3 Advancement 0.12
Feedback 0.00
Status 0.11
28 Achievement 0.14
Job interest 0.16
Meaningful work 0.07
Personal growth 0.10
Use of abilities 0.15
Responsibility – 0.09
Downloaded by Middle East Technical University At 13:58 31 January 2016 (PT)

Contribution to society – 0.10

Independence 0.19
Company 0.00
Work influence 0.13
Organizational influence 0.14
Affective
Recognition 0.06
Co-workers – 0.12
Esteem 0.07
Interaction 0.11
Supervisor – 0.07
Instrumental
Pay 0.15
Table I. Benefits 0.01
Correlations between Security – 0.10
work values and Convenient hours – 0.06
commitment Work conditions 0.00

specific work value items and commitment, such as independence, job interest,
use of abilities, pay, achievement, influence in the organization and in work, and
advancement.
Although the correlations were low, they indicated that certain associations
do exist. As hypothesized, the strongest relationships were observed between
cognitive work values and commitment, e.g. independence, job interest and use
of abilities. Quite remarkably, however, a relatively high correlation was also
observed with pay. Thus, it appears that pay also, although considered
instrumental, is an aspect of work values that is involved with a person’s
commitment to the organization.

Discussion
The major objectives of the present study were to examine the relationships
between work values and commitment and explore whether those values which
were found to be related to commitment in previous studies in the USA (Kidron,
1978) and in the Far East (Putti et al., 1989) hold true in the Israeli context.
 The implications of the study stem from the findings that work values have Work values and
a moderate positive correlation with organizational commitment, and that commitment
cognitive (intrinsic) work values, rather than affective or instrumental values,
are positively related with organizational commitment. Quite remarkably,
however, one instrumental work value, pay, shows a positive relation with
commitment as well. Further research with wider samples of respondents from
various cultural environments, and examining additional aspects of 29
commitment, such as calculative and organizational commitment, that have
been distinguished in previous studies from moral commitment and job
commitment, respectively, need to be studied as well. It may be that in certain
populations affective values also have an effect on commitment, e.g. women are
Downloaded by Middle East Technical University At 13:58 31 January 2016 (PT)

known to assign higher importance to affective values (Elizur, 1994). It may be

expected, similarly, that in calculative commitment additional instrumental
values, e.g. benefits, security, should have a stronger effect than in our case.
Since work values were found to be related to commitment, organizations
which wish to enhance the commitment of their employees should strive for a
congruence between organizational rewards and the important work values of
their members. Furthermore, attempts to enhance commitment should focus on
cognitive outcomes. This, however, does not mean that instrumental values are
unimportant. As the data indicate, at least one instrumental value, pay, showed
also positive relations with commitment. Thus, organizations may combine
cognitive outcomes with other incentives and strategies to enhance
commitment.

References
Borg, I. (1986), “A cross-culture replication on Elizur’s facets of work values”, Multivariate
Behavioral Research, Vol. 21, pp. 401-10.
Braithwaite, V.A. and Law, H.G. (1985), “Structure of human values: testing the adequacy of the
Rokeach value survey”, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 49, pp. 250-63.
Dubin, R., Champoux, J. and Porter, L. (1975), “Central life interest and organizational
commitment of blue collar and clerical workers”, Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 20, pp.
411-21.
Elizur, D. (1970), Adapting to Innovation: A Facet Analysis of the Case of the Computer, Jerusalem
Academic Press, Jerusalem.
Elizur, D. (1984), “Facets of work values: a structural analysis of work outcomes”, Journal of
Applied Psychology, Vol. 69, pp. 379-89.
Elizur, D. (1994), “Gender and work values: a comparative analysis”, The Journal of Social
Psychology, Vol. 134, pp. 201-12.
Elizur, D. and Guttman, L. (1976), “The structure of attitudes toward work and technological
change within an organization”, Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 21, pp. 611-22.
Elizur, D., Borg, I., Hunt, R. and Beck, I.M. (1991), “The structure of work values: a cross-cultural
comparison”, Journal of Organizational Behavior, Vol. 12, pp. 21-38.
Ferris, K.R. and Aranya, N. (1983), “A comparison of two organizational commitment scales”,
Personnel Psychology, Vol. 36, pp. 87-98.
Furnham, A. (1984), “Work values and beliefs in Britain”, Journal of Occupational Behavior,
Vol. 5, pp. 281-91.
 International Graen, G. (1969), “Instrumentality theory of work motivation: some experimental results and
suggested modifications”, Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 53 (monograph), pp. 1-25.
Journal of Guttman, L. (1959), “A structural theory of intergroup beliefs and action”, American Sociological
Manpower Review, Vol. 24, pp. 318-28.
17,3 Guttman, L. (1982), “What is not what in theory construction”, in Hauser, R.M., Mechanic, D. and
Hailer, A. (Eds), Social Structure and Behavior, Academic Press, New York, NY, pp. 331-48.
Herzberg, F., Mausner, B. and Snyderman, B. (1956), The Motivation to Work, 2nd ed., Wiley, New
30 York, NY.
Hrebiniak, L.G. and Alutto, J.A. (1972), “Personal and role-related factors in the development of
organizational commitment”, Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 18, pp. 555-73.
Hunt, S.D., Chouko, L.B. and Wood, V.R. (1985), “Organizational commitment and marketing”,
Journal of Marketing, Vol. 49, pp. 112-26.
Downloaded by Middle East Technical University At 13:58 31 January 2016 (PT)

Ivancevich, J.M. (1985), “Predicting absenteeism from prior absence and work attitudes”,
Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 28, pp. 219-28.
Katz, D. and Kahn, R.L. (1966), The Social Psychology of Organizations, Wiley, New York, NY.
Kidron, A. (1978), “Work values and organizational commitment”, Academy of Management
Journal, Vol. 21, pp. 119-28.
Levy, S. (1990), “Values and deeds”, Applied Psychology: An International Review, Vol. 39,
pp. 379-400.
Levy, S. and Guttman, L. (1976), Values and Attitudes of Israeli High School Children, The Israel
Institute of Applied Social Research, Jerusalem (Hebrew translation).
Luthans, F., McCaul, H.S. and Dodd, N.G. (1985), “Organizational commitment: a comparison of
American, Japanese, and Korean employees”, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 28,
pp. 213-19.
Martin, T.N. and O’Laughlin, M.S. (1984), “Predictors of organizational commitment: the study of
part-time army reservists”, Journal of Vocational Behavior, Vol. 25, pp. 210-28.
Morrow, P. (1983), “Concept redundancy in organizational research: the case of work
commitment”, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 8, pp. 486-500.
Mowday, R.T., Porter, L.W. and Steers, R.M. (1982), Employee-organization Linkages: The
Psychology of Commitment, Absenteeism and Turnover, Academic Press, New York, NY.
Pennings, I.M. (1970), “Work value systems of white-collar workers”, Administrative Science
Quarterly, Vol. 15, 1970, pp. 397-405.
Porter, L.W. and Lawler, E.E. (1968), Managerial Attitudes and Performance, Dorsey Press,
Homewood, IL.
Putti, J.M., Aryee, S. and Ling T.K. (1989), “Work values and organizational commitment: a study
in the Asian context”, Human Relations, Vol. 42, pp. 275-88.
Rokeach, M. (1973), The Nature of Human Values, Free Press, New York, NY.
Rokeach, M. (1979), Understanding Human Values, Free Press, New York, NY.
Rusbult, C.E. and Farrell, D. (1983), “A longitudinal test of the investment model: the impact on job
satisfaction, job commitment and turnover of variations in rewards, costs, alternatives, and
investments”, Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 68, pp. 429-38.
Schwartz, S.H. and Bilsky, W. (1990), “Toward a universal psychological structure of human
values”, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 58, pp. 878-91.
Shye, S. and Elizur, D. (1994), Introduction to Facet Theory: Content Design and Intrinsic Data
Analysis in Behavioral Research, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.
Vroom, V.H. (1964), Work and Motivation, Wiley, New York, NY.
Werkmeister W. (1967), Man and His Values, University of Nebraska Press, Lincoln, NE.
Wiener, Y. and Vardi, Y. (1980), “Relationships between job, organization, and career commitments
and work outcomes: an integrative approach”, Organizational Behavior and Human
Performance, Vol. 26, pp. 81-96.
 This article has been cited by:

1. Peter Stokes, Christopher Baker, Jessica Lichy. 2016. The Role of Embedded Individual Values, Belief and Attitudes and
Spiritual Capital in Shaping Everyday Postsecular Organizational Culture. European Management Review n/a-n/a. [CrossRef]
2. Khaled Aladwan, Ramudu Bhanugopan, Brian D'Netto. 2015. The effects of human resource management practices on
employees’ organisational commitment. International Journal of Organizational Analysis 23:3, 472-492. [Abstract] [Full Text]
[PDF]
3. Sven Hauff, Stefan Kirchner. 2015. Identifying work value patterns: cross-national comparison and historical dynamics.
International Journal of Manpower 36:2, 151-168. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
4. Ercan Yilmaz. 2013. Examination of Entrepreneurship from Humanistic Values Perspective. Sociology Mind 03, 205-209.
[CrossRef]
5. Michael Chiu Kai‐ting. 2012. Development and impacts of a new performance management system in the Hong Kong police
force. Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies & Management 35:3, 468-490. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
6. Chonlatis Darawong, Barbara Igel. 2012. Acculturation of local new product development team members in MNC subsidiaries
in Thailand. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics 24:3, 351-371. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
7. Bernard Burnes, Rune Todnem By. 2012. Leadership and Change: The Case for Greater Ethical Clarity. Journal of Business
Ethics 108, 239-252. [CrossRef]
8. Bernard Burnes, Philip Jackson. 2011. Success and Failure In Organizational Change: An Exploration of the Role of Values.
Downloaded by Middle East Technical University At 13:58 31 January 2016 (PT)

Journal of Change Management 11, 133-162. [CrossRef]

9. Stuart Roper, Gary Davies. 2010. Business to business branding: external and internal satisfiers and the role of training quality.
European Journal of Marketing 44:5, 567-590. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
10. Jan Selmer, Romie Littrell. 2010. Business managers' work value changes through down economies. Journal of Chinese Human
Resources Management 1:1, 31-48. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
11. Bih‐Shiaw Jaw, Ya‐Hui Ling, Christina Yu‐Ping Wang, Wen‐Ching Chang. 2007. The impact of culture on Chinese
employees' work values. Personnel Review 36:1, 128-144. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
12. Christopher White. 2006. Towards an understanding of the relationship between work values and cultural orientations.
International Journal of Hospitality Management 25, 699-715. [CrossRef]
13. David McGuire, Thomas N. Garavan, Sudhir K. Saha, David O'Donnell. 2006. The impact of individual values on human
resource decision‐making by line managers. International Journal of Manpower 27:3, 251-273. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
14. Luis M. Arciniega, Luis González. 2006. What is the influence of work values relative to other variables in the development
of organizational commitment?. Revista de Psicología Social 21, 35-50. [CrossRef]
15. Thomas Acton, Willie Golden. 2003. Training the knowledge worker: a descriptive study of training practices in Irish software
companies. Journal of European Industrial Training 27:2/3/4, 137-146. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
16. Dov Elizur, Meni Koslowsky. 2001. Values and organizational commitment. International Journal of Manpower 22:7, 593-599.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]