Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Heat Transfer
Heat Transfer
Every student in phase behavior class had an experiment to do. The objective of the
experiment was to study the relationship between Volume, Pressure, and Temperature (PVT). To
use the PVT Simulator was simple. First, there were few steps before you begin the experiment
in the system which was guiding steps to start the system. On the simulator, record the standard
conditions for volume, vapor as yellow, liquid as brown, volume of mercury removed, the sum
of volume (liquid and vapor), and then pressure. When you begin the experiment, recording the
values every time it changes is required for the experiment to see the relationship between the
Volume, Pressure, and Temperature. On the other hand, there are different temperatures from
one group to another. So each group has different numbers to record during the experiment.
Every time you open the PVT Simulator System, the standard conditions are the same for every
group which is 10 for liquid, 0 for vapor, and 0 mercury removed, and also the pressure is the
same starting at 2000. Now, the idea is kind of complicated but easy to follow. Start by using F5
every time you want to remove arbitrary amounts of mercury to reduce the pressure and find the
bubble point. Record the volume and pressure values are very important to do the experiment.
The technique is by typing the number followed with a minus sign, the volume (liquid) is going
down, and by typing the number without a minus sign, the volume (vapor) is going down. The
main objective for the PVT Simulator is to get to the bubble point for the volume vapor and dew
point for the liquid (should get to 0.002 cc or less). Keep going until you get to the bubble and
dew point (until you get to 0.002 cc or 0.001) proceed with 4 or 5 readings while continuing the
experiment, recording is required for every step. Overall, it was a simple experiment.
Regards,
Ibraheem Alkhuder
Concept:
The concept is to have a pure substance. Which means the liquid must be at the bubble
point to develop the first molecules into gas bubbles. As for the dew point, it should develop the
last liquid molecules into gas bubbles. These points are required to make the pressure equals the
Objective:
The objective of the experiment is to use the PVT system simulator to study the
relationship between the Volume, Pressure, and Temperature. Also it is to find the volume vapor
bubble point and liquid dew point of pure carbon dioxide at standard condition. Keep in mind
using 4 different temperatures for each group. In addition, the experiment has some tools like: a
small black oil tank, a small mercury tank, and pressure measuring device.
Experimental Procedure:
At the beginning of the experiment the main idea is to get the volume liquid and volume
vapor (gas) 0.002 cc or less, which means at bubble and dew point. To do that, a multiple things
must be done first. Open the PVT Simulator, hit F2 to open/close valves, and then hit F5 to
utilize the hand pump and enter values, notice the change of volume liquid and gas, and pressure.
Then, recording pressure and mercury’s volume reading is important to do the experiment.
The figure (1) below is very close to the actual PVT Simulator as you do the experiment.
Figure 1
The experiment is simple and easy to follow the steps. The objective is to get low as you
can get (0.002 or less) by repeating the same values until you reach bubble and dew point, but
keep in mind 0.000 is not needed, for it is either 0.002 or 0.001. Additionally, the pressure can be
read in any location if the valve is open. The default pressure is either 14.7 psia or 0 psig. On the
other hand, anyone who is trying to do the experiment should know that as more mercury is
Figure 2
As for figure (2) above, it shows the explanation of bubble point and dew point, and the
Results:
The results I have got in doing the experiment were good and satisfying, as the bubble
point and dew point have been found. As soon as you get the volume vapor to the bubble point
The tables below show everything I have recorded until I got to the bubble and dew point
(0.002 or 0.001). In the experiment, to get to the bubble and dew point is to do some calculations
Group 1
Vl Vg Vhg Vt P
10 0 0 10 2000 and enter a lot of numbers, and if the numbers were too many
11 0 1 11 1824
before you reach to your goal, the experiment will exit itself
940.8
13 0 3 13
6
means it has been destroyed and you go back and do the
13.31 13.31
0.002 3.319 214.1
7 9 experiment from the beginning. So, concentrating and
10.45 18.31
7.865 8.319 914.1
4 9 calculations are important when doing the experiment to
23.59 18.31 28.31
4.726 914.1
3 9 9 avoid this issue.
31.45 Pressure 33.31
vs Mercury Volume
1.863 23.32 914.1
6
2500 9 Also, I have the graphs below that show the
36.56 36.56
0.001 2000 26.57 914.1
8 9 relationship between volume mercury and
41.56
1500 41.56 880.6
0
2
1000 2 3 pressure.
46.56 46.56 843.8
0 500
9 9 3
0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Table1
Graph1
Group 11
Vl Vg Vhg Vt P
10 0 0 102000
13 0 3 131068
1004.
14 0 4 14
9
14.43 4.43 14.43 990.0
0.002
1 3 3 1
7.43 17.43 990.0
11.54 5.893
3 3 1
15.71 12.4 22.43 990.0
6.722
1 3 3 1 Table 3
23.56 16.4 26.43 990.0
Pressure vs Mercury Volume
2.868
5 3 3 1 Graph
2500
29.40 19.4 29.40 990.0
0.002
5 2000 1 7 1 3
34.40 24.4 34.40 958.5
0
7 1500 1 7 3
39.40 29.4 39.40
0 1000 918.7
7 1 7
Pressure
500 vs Mercury Volume
2500 Group 15
0
Vl 1 Vg
2 3 Vhg
4 5 Vt 6 7P 8 9 10
2000
10 0 0 10 2000
1500 11 0 1 11 1505.9
1000
13 0 3 13 1134
15.602 0.002 5.604 15.604 1034.2
500 12.327 5.277 7.604 17.604 1034.2
0 5.777 15.827 11.6 21.604 1034.2
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
2.502 21.102 13.6 23.604 1034.2
0.002 25.129 15.13 25.131 1034.2
0 29.131 19.13 29.131 1014.6
0 33.131 23.13 33.131 984.94
Table 4 Graph 4
As seen in the results, the tables are explaining what the values are that made me get to
the bubble point and dew point. Look close to the shaded area in the tables, that shows the
volume liquid (Vl) at bubble point and volume gas (Vg) at dew point, and there is volume total
(Vt) means the sum of volume liquid and volume gas, and lastly look how the pressure (P) is
changing when you increase and decrease the values. Also, the tables have many readings
because it is required to record how it reached to (0.002 or 0.001). So, I have done the
experiment 4 times in 4 different temperatures because the values are going to be different if the
temperature is different. As for the graphs, it shows the relationship between the pressure in the
Overall, the experiment could be possible to have errors and mistakes due to mercury
compressibility, mercury might mess up the pressure measuring, and another issue is trapped air
in lines, means altering the original pressure. Also, instrument accuracy (10), means it is not
practical for real work. Other issues like temperature of black oil tank, it plays a huge role which
the issue here is that has to be maintained throughout the experiment so it does not affect the
pressure reading. Last but not least, human errors, like anyone could record the wrong reading or
maybe forget a step or something which it may lead to do the experiment in a wrong way!
Conclusion:
In conclusion, the experiment was very simple and useful for those who want to become
an engineer. I have learned from this experiment how to operate a mercury valve, how to reach
or find the bubble and dew point for volume liquid and volume gas and more important how to
use obtained information about an experiment. Other than that, the experiment went perfectly
and I’m sure it taught a lot of students how to manage the PVT Simulator System.
References
1. Hosein, R., Mayrhoo, R., & McCain Jr. "Determination of Bubble-Point and Dew-Point
Pressure without a Visual Cell." - OnePetro. Society of Petroleum Engineers, 9 June 2014. Web.
2. Dali Hou, Yang Xiao, Yi Pan, Lei Sun, and Kai Li,. "Experiment and Simulation Study on the
Special Phase Behavior of Huachang Near-Critical Condensate Gas Reservoir Fluid." Journal of
Chemistry 2016 (2016): 10. Web. 5 Nov. 2015.
3. Julius U. Akpabio1,2*, Sunday O. Isehunwa2 and Oluwatoyin O. Akinsete. "PVT Fluid
Sampling, Characterization and Gas Condensate Reservoir Modeling." Advances in Research
(2015): n. pag. Print.