Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 1

LORENZO SHIPPING CORPORATION v.

NATIONAL POWER CORPORATION


FACTS:
Lorenzo Shipping is the owner and operator of the commercial vessel MV Lorcon Luzon.
National Power Corporation is the owner of Power Barge 104, “a nonpropelled power plant
barge” which was berthed and stationed at the Makar Wharf. Captain Villarias served as the
Master of MV Luzon. However, MV Luzon at the time was being piloted by Captain Yape as
Harbor Pilot. As they were docking, Captain Yape ordered the vessel to proceed “slow ahead,”
As it moved closer to dock, Captain Yape gave the order “dead slow ahead,” making the vessel
move even slower. He then ordered the engine stopped. As the MV Lorcon Luzon moved
“precariously close” to the wharf, Captain Yape ordered the vessel to move backward, i.e., go
“slow astern,” and subsequently “full astern.” The engine failed to timely respond. Thus, Captain
Yape ordered the dropping of the anchor. Despite this, they still rammed into Power Barge 104.
The National Power Corporation filed a complaint for damages against Lorenzo
Shipping. The NPC claims that the Power Barge 102, connected with the Power Barge 104,
tripped off and caused a total blackout in General Santos City and its underlying areas, that
there was damage to a tank which caused waste oil to leak into the sea, and that they suffered
generation losses as a result. Lorenzo Shipping claims that any liability should be attributed to
the Harbor Pilot and not to the company. RTC absolved Lorenzo Shipping of liability stating that
their negligence was not established. The CA reversed. The CA reasoned that even if the
vessel was under compulsory pilotage, Captain Villarias, the vessel’s Master, remained to be its
overall commander. It added that he was remiss in his duties as he did nothing in the crucial
moments when Captain Yape’s orders to go astern appeared to not have been heeded.

ISSUE:
Whether or not Lorenzo Shipping is liable for the damage sustained by Power Barge
104, despite being under mandatory pilotage by Captain Yape. (YES)

RULING:
Lorenzo Shipping remains to be liable for damages despite the mandatory pilotage of
Captain Yape. PPA Administrative Order No. 03-85 specifies the foremost responsibility of a
Harbor Pilot, that is, the direction of the vessel being piloted. Said order makes the Harbor Pilot
liable for damage caused by his or her negligence or fault. The same provision, however,
emphasizes that “overall command” of the vessel remains in the Master of the vessel. The
Master shall retain overall command of the vessel even on pilotage grounds whereby he can
countermand or overrule the order or command of the Harbor Pilot onboard. In such event, any
damage caused to a vessel or to life and property at ports by reason of the fault or negligence of
the Master shall be the responsibility and liability of the registered owner of the vessel
concerned without prejudice to recourse against said Master. Captain Villarias was remiss in his
duties. In his testimony before the Board of Marine Inquiry, Captain Villarias admitted that about
six (6) minutes had passed before he even realized that there was an engine failure. Six (6)
minutes cannot be characterized as so quick and fleeting that it deprived Captain Villarias and
his crew of “the time they needed to arrest the momentum of the vessel

You might also like