Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Psych 162: Observation: Behavior-Based Inventories, Checklists, Rating Scales
Psych 162: Observation: Behavior-Based Inventories, Checklists, Rating Scales
Assumptions
- Shared understanding about the construct
- Ability to detect information/ behavior relevant to the attribute of interest
Advantages
- Standardized format
- Draw on past experiences (varied situations)
- Convenient and economical to use
- Detect potentially rare but salient behaviors
- Different formats, different topic areas
- Quantifiable information regarding frequency, severity
- Ideal for initial screening measures for new referrals
- Summarizes data obtained from observations and interviews
- Can be administered more than once
Disadvantages
- Social desirability can affect behavior ratings
- Rater’s degree of familiarity with both the person an his/her environment
- Cannot take into account the situation or context of the person’s behavior
- Accuracy and consistency of ratings can be influenced by rating scale characteristics
1
Thursday, 23 March 2017
- Self-report instruments
• The person being observed/ assessed rates him/herself
- Informant instrument
• Parent/teacher/close other rates the behavior of the person
2
Thursday, 23 March 2017
- Expectancy effect
- Observer reactivity
- Unrepresentative sample
Reliability
- Inter-observer reliability
- Test-retest reliability
- Internal consistency reliability
Validity
- Construct validity: whether coded observation fit the construct observed
- Content validity: data must reflect the nature and degree of the construct observed
- Concurrent validity: reflect individual’s reactions in other situations
- Predictive validity: behaviors predict other important criteria