The ADAPT questioning system is a logical method developed by Thomas Ingram to provide support during relationship-based selling over multiple meetings. It consists of five types of questions asked in a specific order: Assessment questions to gather broad customer information; Discovery questions to understand problems and emotions in more depth; Activation questions to make customers feel discomfort with current problems; Projection questions to show customers solutions and benefits of solving problems; and Transition questions to move to a sales presentation aligned with customer needs.
Fisher and Ury proposed four elements of principled negotiation: separating people from problems to avoid emotions clouding issues; focusing on interests, not positions, and prioritizing shared interests; inventing options for mutual gain rather than limiting solutions
The ADAPT questioning system is a logical method developed by Thomas Ingram to provide support during relationship-based selling over multiple meetings. It consists of five types of questions asked in a specific order: Assessment questions to gather broad customer information; Discovery questions to understand problems and emotions in more depth; Activation questions to make customers feel discomfort with current problems; Projection questions to show customers solutions and benefits of solving problems; and Transition questions to move to a sales presentation aligned with customer needs.
Fisher and Ury proposed four elements of principled negotiation: separating people from problems to avoid emotions clouding issues; focusing on interests, not positions, and prioritizing shared interests; inventing options for mutual gain rather than limiting solutions
The ADAPT questioning system is a logical method developed by Thomas Ingram to provide support during relationship-based selling over multiple meetings. It consists of five types of questions asked in a specific order: Assessment questions to gather broad customer information; Discovery questions to understand problems and emotions in more depth; Activation questions to make customers feel discomfort with current problems; Projection questions to show customers solutions and benefits of solving problems; and Transition questions to move to a sales presentation aligned with customer needs.
Fisher and Ury proposed four elements of principled negotiation: separating people from problems to avoid emotions clouding issues; focusing on interests, not positions, and prioritizing shared interests; inventing options for mutual gain rather than limiting solutions
The ADAPT questioning system is a logical method developed by Thomas Ingram to provide support during relationship-based selling over multiple meetings. It consists of five types of questions asked in a specific order: Assessment questions to gather broad customer information; Discovery questions to understand problems and emotions in more depth; Activation questions to make customers feel discomfort with current problems; Projection questions to show customers solutions and benefits of solving problems; and Transition questions to move to a sales presentation aligned with customer needs.
Fisher and Ury proposed four elements of principled negotiation: separating people from problems to avoid emotions clouding issues; focusing on interests, not positions, and prioritizing shared interests; inventing options for mutual gain rather than limiting solutions
Q1. What is the ADAPT (Assessment, Discovery, Activation, Projection,
Transition) questioning system? The ADAPT questioning system is a logical method that was developed by Thomas Ingram. It was developed to provide support to the relationship-based selling that happens over multiple meetings on a long-term basis. It is used to gain information about the customer, along with discovering problems and providing solutions to them. The method consists of five types of questions in the specific order. Assessment – The assessment questions are the opening and broad questions asked to gather information about the customers. These are generally open-ended, relaxing, non-threatening, to make them comfortable and gather information about the customers. These can be about their current situation, their work situation, history, etc. Discovery – Questions in this phase are deeper than assessment. After identifying any problem areas, question in detail about facts as well as of their emotions and perceptions, enquiry about their experiences. The discovery questions are aimed to be used for understanding where and how to make a selling pitch. Activation – After identifying the problems in detail, in this phase the acquired information is used to active their discomfort and consequences they might have due to the identified problems. The aim here is to make the customers feel the discomfort and uncomfortable situation that they are facing, to make them realise of the problems and their negative consequences in the future. Projection – After the activation of discomfort and making them realise of the problems, the projection questions are used to make them see to the solutions. These questions are used to project to them the benefits and a scenario where the problems are solved. Use of projection to give them hint of what they are seeking as solutions. Transition – After finding the customer’s facts and interests, and making them aware of the problems along with solutions, the last phase is to move forward to the sales presentation. In this phase, the facts of the customers are used to pitch them with an alignment with their requirements and needs. It is used to provide them solutions based on their interests and needs.
Q2. What are the four elements of Principled Negotiation proposed by
Fisher & Ury? Roger Fisher & William Ury of the Harvard Negotiation Project, in their negotiation text “Getting to Yes: Negotiating Agreement without Giving In” described four main elements of principled negotiation. It was designed “to produce wise outcomes efficiently and amicably”. The four elements are – Separate the People from the Problem – The aim is to attain a better and mutual understanding in a negotiation. With personal involvement and strong emotions, the negotiation issues could get clouded and clear view of the situation may become complicated to solve. So, the authors suggest to separate personal ego & emotions like fear, anger, from the issues at stake. Thus, it would result in clear view of the conflict that is to be dealt. Focus on Interests, not Positions – In principled negotiation, the negotiators are focused on shared interests, needs, desired results, rather than factors like past events and getting own way first. This element focuses on the importance of prioritizing the interests and needs, along with an openness to different positions. Invent Options for Mutual Gain – In negotiation, to attain a mutually gained agreement that is beneficial for all the involved parties, the authors suggest ways to invent and broaden options for mutual gain, rather than limiting to solutions. The authors suggest the negotiators to devote time with brainstorming, evaluation of varied range of possible options, focusing on shared interests. As per this element, it is required to search for proposal beneficial to all parties with mutual gains. Insist on Using Objective Criteria – In principled negotiation, to avoid an inefficient compromise, the authors suggest to negotiate based on objective criteria – an independent standard for all parties involved. The objective criteria need to be logical and legitimate standard, based on factors like law, industry protocols, market value, etc.