Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Cigarette Smoking Among Persons With Schizophrenia or Bipolar Disorder in Routine Clinical Settings, 1999-2011 PDF
Cigarette Smoking Among Persons With Schizophrenia or Bipolar Disorder in Routine Clinical Settings, 1999-2011 PDF
Cigarette Smoking Among Persons With Schizophrenia or Bipolar Disorder in Routine Clinical Settings, 1999-2011 PDF
Objective: This study examined the prevalence of cigarette smoking and serious mental illnesses smoke ciga-
the quantity of cigarettes consumed by individuals with schizophrenia or rettes compared with those in the
bipolar disorder and by those with no psychiatric disorder in the period overall population (4,5). Among those
1999–2011. Methods: A total of 991 individuals with schizophrenia, bi- with serious mental illness, the preva-
polar disorder, or no psychiatric illness provided information about their lence of smoking has been found to be
cigarette smoking at recruitment into a research study for which they higher among persons with schizo-
were selected without regard to their smoking status. Differences among phrenia than among those with bipolar
groups and trends over time among new enrollees were examined with disorder or major depression (5). Pre-
multivariate models. Regression analyses were used to compare smoking vious studies also indicate that persons
between the schizophrenia and bipolar disorder groups. Results: There with serious mental illness smoke more
were marked differences in the prevalence of smoking and in the heavily, have longer smoking histories,
quantity of cigarettes consumed among the diagnostic groups. Overall, and have lower rates of smoking
64% of individuals with schizophrenia, 44% with bipolar disorder, and cessation than smokers in the overall
19% without psychiatric illness reported that they were current smokers. population (6–8). It is not surprising,
These group differences remained fairly constant over the observation then, that cigarette smoking contrib-
period, and there were no statistically significant time trends in smoking utes to the excess morbidity and
or cigarette consumption after adjustment for demographic covariates. mortality among people with schizo-
Within the psychiatric illness groups, smoking and cigarette consumption phrenia and other serious mental
were significantly associated with less education, a history of substance illnesses (9–11).
abuse, longer illness duration, Caucasian race, and schizophrenia di- Over the past decades there have
agnosis but not with psychiatric symptom severity. Conclusions: The been intense public health campaigns
prevalence of smoking has remained alarmingly high among individuals to reduce cigarette smoking in the
with schizophrenia and bipolar disorder in routine psychiatric settings. overall population. Although 42.4% of
Concerted efforts are urgently needed to promote smoking cessation in adults in the United States were
these groups. (Psychiatric Services 64:44–50, 2013; doi: 10.1176/appi. smokers in 1965, the prevalence had
ps.001432012) declined to 24.7% in 1997 and then to
19.3% in 2010, the most recent year
S
moking is the leading cause of disease and contributes to other health for which data are available (1,12).
preventable mortality in the problems, such as diabetes and obesity Attention to cigarette smoking among
United States (1). Smoking is (2,3). Previous studies have docu- persons with serious mental illness has
a risk factor for lung cancer and heart mented that many more people with lagged behind efforts in the overall
population despite the high preva-
Dr. Dickerson, Ms. Stallings, Ms. Origoni, Ms. Vaughan, and Dr. Khushalani are lence of smoking and the known
affiliated with the Stanley Research Center, Sheppard Pratt Health System, 6501 North health risks to persons with mental
Charles St., Baltimore, MD 21204 (e-mail: fdickerson@sheppardpratt.org). Dr. illness. This gap is due to a number
Schroeder is with Schroeder Statistical Consulting LLC, Ellicott City, Maryland. Dr. of factors, including inattention by
Yolken is with Johns Hopkins University, School of Medicine, Baltimore. health care providers and also the
Characteristic N % N % N %
inpatient settings (132 of 547, 24%), individuals with schizophrenia, 55 of and for participants without mental
day hospital programs (29 of 547, 126 (44%) with bipolar disorder, and illness (x2=15.5, df=3, p=.002) but not
5%), or office practices (32 of 547, 86 of 444 (19%) participants without for smokers with bipolar disorder.
6%) at the research program site; psychiatric illness reported that they For the smokers with schizophre-
recruitment setting was not signifi- were current smokers. The prevalence nia, the log odds of being in the
cantly associated with smoking status. of smoking in each group, by enroll- highest two consumption categories
Almost all of the participants with ment year, is shown in Figure 1. (.1.0–1.5 ppd and .1.5 ppd) rela-
schizophrenia or bipolar disorder There was no statistically significant tive to the lowest category (#.5 ppd)
(540 of 547, 99%) were receiving effect of recruitment year on smoking decreased significantly over time
psychotropic medication at the time prevalence for any of the diagnostic (x2=10.3, df=1, p=.001, and x2=5.86,
of their study enrollment. A total of groups (schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, df=1, p=.016, respectively). For par-
340 (81%) of the participants with or no disorder). An overall model ticipants with no disorder, the likeli-
schizophrenia and 61 (48%) of par- consisting of diagnostic group, year, hood of being in the consumption
ticipants with bipolar disorder were and diagnostic group 3 year interaction category .1.0–1.5 ppd, relative to the
receiving second-generation antipsy- showed a statistically significant main lowest category, ,.5 ppd, showed a
chotic medications; 57 (14%) and 37 effect for diagnostic group (x2=182.5, trend toward statistical significance
(29%), respectively, were receiving df=2, p,.001) but no effect of year and (x2=2.92, df=1, p=.09). Adjusting for
lithium; 148 (35%) and 75 (60%), no interaction. Adjusting for the cova- the covariates age, race, and gender
respectively, were receiving an anti- riates of age, race, and gender also did did not change the results for the
convulsant medication; and 77 (18%) not affect the results. participants without a disorder, but
and 60 (48%), respectively, were re- the effect of year became non-
ceiving an antidepressant. A total of 43 Consumption of cigarettes significant for the smokers with
(8%) were receiving bupropion, which and trends over time schizophrenia.
may be used for smoking cessation, The quantity of cigarettes smoked per An overall model consisting of di-
and no one was receiving varenicline, day by diagnostic group is shown in agnostic group, year, and diagnostic
a smoking cessation medication. Table 1 and by the smokers with group 3 year interaction showed
schizophrenia is shown in Figure 2. a highly significant effect of diagnostic
Smoking prevalence There were statistically significant de- group (x2=65.4, df=6, p,.001),
and trends over time creases in cigarette consumption over whereas neither the effect of study
During the years of the study recruit- the study period for smokers with year nor the group 3 year interaction
ment, a total of 268 of 421 (64%) schizophrenia (x2=12.9, df=3, p,.005) achieved statistical significance. When
Smokers (%)
60
Correlates of tobacco 50
use with mental illness 40
As shown in Table 2, a multiple 30
logistic regression model showed 20
that across all years of study enroll- 10
ment, current smoking among the 0
participants with a psychiatric disor- 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
der was significantly associated with a a
Data are not shown for the bipolar disorder sample prior to 2007 or for the control group (no
longer duration of psychiatric illness, psychiatric illness) for 2004 because N,10 for each of these years for these groups. Number of
history of substance abuse, fewer persons in each of the other groups, by year, follows. For schizophrenia: 1999, 15; 2000, 21; 2001,
years of education, Caucasian race, 10; 2002, 27; 2003, 34; 2004, 15; 2005, 48; 2006, 21; 2007, 26; 2008, 49; 2009, 77; 2010, 41; 2011, 37.
For bipolar disorder: 2007, 15; 2008, 14; 2009, 20; 2010, 30; 2011, 33. For the no-disorder control
and schizophrenia compared with group: 2002, 71; 2003, 28; 2005, 66; 2006, 35; 2007, 45; 2008, 64; 2009, 61; 2010, 35; 2011, 39
bipolar disorder diagnosis. In this
model, we did not find a statistically diagnostic groups in this study. These The prevalence of smoking in our
significant association between smok- group differences remained relatively sample is generally consistent with, but
ing status and symptom severity as constant over the observation period, at the lower end of, that observed in
measured by the PANSS total score, and there were no significant time other recent U.S. cohorts of individu-
gender, or socioeconomic status trends in prevalence of smoking or als with schizophrenia and bipolar
measured by maternal education. quantity of cigarettes consumed when disorder. In studies of schizophrenia
As also shown in Table 2, an ordinal analyses adjusted for demographic published since 2000, the reported
multiple logistic regression showed covariates. prevalence of smoking ranges from
that the quantity of cigarettes con-
sumed by the participants with mental
illness was significantly associated with Figure 2
these same variables and with male Quantity of cigarettes consumed (packs per day) by smokers with
gender. schizophrenia, by year of study enrollmenta
Within the bipolar disorder and
schizophrenia groups, there were no >1.5 >.5–1.0
statistically significant associations be- >1.0–1.5 >.0–.5
100
tween smoking status and receipt of
selected specific medications (valproate,
90
clozapine, olanzapine, or lithium) or
classes of medication (anticonvulsant
80
or any second-generation agent) ex-
cept for bupropion, which was signif-
70
icantly and inversely associated with
smoking for persons with schizophre- 60
nia (x2=4.60, df=1, p=.032) but not for
Percentage
Discussion 0
We found marked differences in the 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
prevalence of smoking and in the quan- a
Number of smokers per year: 1999, 10; 2000, 11; 2001, 5; 2002, 20; 2003, 20; 2004, 10; 2005, 28;
tity of cigarette consumption among the 2006, 13; 2007, 19; 2008, 30; 2009, 53; 2010, 24; 2011, 23
61% to 88% (4,5,17,24). In the fewer race, though the latter is not found in for additional comparisons between
studies of smoking with bipolar disor- all studies of persons with serious the groups.
der, the reported prevalence ranges mental illness nor in the U.S. overall Although our recruitment efforts
from 31% to 69% (6,19,20,33,34). population (1,17–20). We found no were continual for the three diagnostic
It is noteworthy that none of these significant association between ciga- groups throughout the study period,
previous studies compared persons rette smoking or quantity of cigarettes enrollment into research studies is
enrolled at different time points to consumed and the severity of psychi- affected by many factors, and we can-
determine time trends as we did in atric symptoms. Results of previous not rule out the possibility that there
this investigation. studies are mixed on this topic may be unmeasured confounders that
In addition to showing differences (17,18,21–24). Our data also suggest could distort the relationships among
in smoking between individuals with that cigarette smoking is not associated the groups or the apparent effects of
schizophrenia and individuals without with the receipt of specific medications time. It is also possible that the per-
a psychiatric disorder, our study also except bupropion. However, we do sons who participated in our studies
demonstrated that individuals with not know whether the lower amount are not fully representative of persons
schizophrenia are more likely to be of smoking by persons receiving with these disorders in clinical settings
smokers and to consume larger num- bupropion was an effect of its use as because our participants voluntarily
bers of cigarettes than individuals with a smoking cessation medication. consented to a research study. How-
bipolar disorder. With the exception of Strengths of our study include that ever, smoking status was not a basis for
a study by Diaz and colleagues (34), no we had a relatively large sample that inclusion in the study, so it is unlikely
studies have directly evaluated and included two groups with psychiatric that participation introduced any clear
compared smoking among individuals illness and a control group with no bias with respect to smoking.
with schizophrenia and individuals with psychiatric illness. Smoking was as- Finally, although our overall sample
bipolar disorder in the same investiga- sessed among new study enrollees in size was relatively large, individuals
tion. We enrolled individuals with a period that exceeded a decade, with bipolar disorder were underrep-
either disorder from the same geo- through 2011. resented. In addition, we may have
graphic area and treatment centers, and One limitation of our study was that had limited power to detect time
our analytic model included covariates we did not biochemically verify smok- trends given the small number of
that are also associated with smoking. ing status, although self-report of individuals for some recruitment years
Therefore, our comparisons between smoking is considered valid in epide- for some diagnostic groups.
the two psychiatric groups are relatively miological studies (1). Another limi-
free of obvious confounders. tation was that we assessed smoking Conclusions
The demographic and clinical cor- status only at study entry, so we do not Our study demonstrates that the
relates of smoking that we found are know the change in smoking status or relatively high prevalence rates of
generally consistent with previous in the quantity of cigarettes consumed smoking by individuals with schizo-
studies of smoking by persons with by participants over time. In addition, phrenia or with bipolar disorder have
mental illness and mirror trends in the we did not collect data on the duration persisted over the past decade despite
overall population: lower education of smoking or quit attempts, which increasing environmental restrictions
(1), male gender (1,4), a history of would be informative about the to- on smoking, ongoing public health
substance abuse (5), and Caucasian pography of smoking and provide data campaigns, rising cigarette prices, and