Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • G. V. Florida Transit Inc. Vs Tiara Commercial Corporation - 842 SCRA (2017)

    Uploaded by

    Mistery Gaimier
    6 views1 page
    G. V. Florida Transit Inc. vs Tiara Commercial Corporation established that voluntary appearance of a defendant is equivalent to service of summons, which gives a court jurisdiction over the defendant. However, if a defendant raises the issue of lack of jurisdiction, they can also include other grounds for objection without it being considered a voluntary appearance that waives the jurisdiction argument.

    Original Description:

    Original Title

    G. V. Florida Transit Inc. vs Tiara Commercial Corporation_842 SCRA (2017).docx

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    G. V. Florida Transit Inc. vs Tiara Commercial Corporation established that voluntary appearance of a defendant is equivalent to service of summons, which gives a court jurisdiction over the defendant. However, if a defendant raises the issue of lack of jurisdiction, they can also include other grounds for objection without it being considered a voluntary appearance that waives the jurisdiction argument.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    6 views1 page

    G. V. Florida Transit Inc. Vs Tiara Commercial Corporation - 842 SCRA (2017)

    Uploaded by

    Mistery Gaimier
    G. V. Florida Transit Inc. vs Tiara Commercial Corporation established that voluntary appearance of a defendant is equivalent to service of summons, which gives a court jurisdiction over the defendant. However, if a defendant raises the issue of lack of jurisdiction, they can also include other grounds for objection without it being considered a voluntary appearance that waives the jurisdiction argument.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    of 1

    93. G. V. Florida Transit Inc.

    vs Tiara Commercial Corporation 842 SCRA (2017)


    Under Section 20 of Rule 14, voluntary appearance of a defendant is equivalent to service of
    summons, which then gives a court jurisdiction over such defendant. Section 20 of Rule 14 of the
    Rules of Court provides that so long as a defendant raises the issue of lack of jurisdiction, he or
    she is allowed to include other grounds of objection. In such case, there is no voluntary
    appearance.

    You might also like