Professional Documents
Culture Documents
CIA 3 - Response Paper I
CIA 3 - Response Paper I
OVERVIEW
• the falling standards, public mistrust and declining confidence in the legal profession, particularly in
lawyers, the time has come to emphasize a deeper understand of professional ethics among lawyers.
• Lawyers should not isolate their private morality as distinct from their
legal profession.
• Both the Bar Council and legal academy undermining the normative
values in lawyer
FIRST REASON:
“If the legal system is so so professional, ethical and noble, then why it is that the legal system have
increasingly become inaccessible to the poor and marginalised section.”
• Laweyrs, on the other hand, care embody traditional masculine values of rationality, neutrality and
impartiality in a fair and predictable legal system
• The author believes that there shouldn’t be just feminine value or masculine values.
• This has resulted in creating a gap between lawyers and public in understanding the concept of
professional ethics.
• Because of this gap, public has lost their faith in the legal profession
• And they perceive lawyers as cold, uncaring, aggressive, competitive and overly rule oriented.
• Absence of ‘real’ professional value can be witnessed from the fact that
• 90 percent of the Supreme Court lawyers appearing for the Advocates on Record examination in 2013
failed the paper on Professional Ethics and Advocacy.
Lower Court Judges have Narrow Minded Opinionated Views and Focus on Upholding
Procedural and Administrative Views
The structure and practice milieu of legal practice in India has been radically altered in the last decade or
so. In this context, the legal academy and the Bar must attempt to develop new approaches to teaching,
learning and practicing professional responsibility which will require a counter-socialisation of sorts that
prioritises social context, moral reasoning, care and connection, intuition and motivation.
SECOND REASON
THIRD REASON: MASCULINE VS FEMININE VALUES: GAP BETWEEN LAWYERS AND PUBLIC
Conclusion
- Ipshita Sengupta
• Lawyers should not isolate their private morality as distinct from their legal profession.
• Every lawyer shall integrate their individual emotions, feelings ad instincts into professional decision
making.
• Incined and restricted to the standards of professional conduct and etiquette for lawyers as devised by
the Bar Council of India rules; and
OVERVIEW
• Despite such large numbers, Indian legal profession has constantly become a subject of public
misunderstanding and mistrust
• Both the Bar Council and legal academy undermining the normative values in lawyer
• and which finally becomes the peutimate reason of widespread public mistrust and disbelief in the
Indian legal profession
Assumption of Law
Movement to "Humanize Legal Education
• by prioritizing
• the falling standards, public mistrust and declining confidence in the legal profession, particularly in
lawyers, the time has come to emphasize a deeper understand of professional ethics among lawyers.
• Resulted in distancing themselves from ethical responsibilities and goals of truth and justice
Ethics of Care