Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Ms File 5b692123b87d92.42985137 PDF
Ms File 5b692123b87d92.42985137 PDF
Ms File 5b692123b87d92.42985137 PDF
ABSTRACT
Introduction: E-learning has changed the college experience for many students. Rather than sitting through college courses
and taking notes, tech-savvy Net generation students are taking advantage of online classes and other forms of online learning.
Materials and Methods: A questionnaire was prepared and distributed among various undergraduate students, and the
results were assessed.Results: Based on the results obtained, e-learning has a positive influence on the academic performance
of undergraduate students.Conclusion: Overall, traditional learning is expensive and takes a long time, and the results can
vary. E-learning offers an alternative that is faster, cheaper, and potentially better. E-learning has to be implemented and made
available to everyone easily.
Department of Biochemistry, Saveetha Dental College, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Saveetha
1
University, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India, 2Department of Biochemistry, Saveetha Dental College, Saveetha Institute of
Medical and Technical Sciences, Saveetha University, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
*Corresponding author: V. Vishnu Priya, Department of Biochemistry, Saveetha Dental College, Saveetha Institute of
Medical and Technical Sciences, Saveetha University, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India. E-mail:drvishnupriyav@gmail.com
students’ learning abilities and academic achievement of e-learning method, 67% of participants claimed
and that students are often chronically sleep to prefer interactive e-learning, 16% preferred text
deprived.[23] The implementation of e-learning could driven e-learning, and 16% preferred stimulation
help the students in doing their assessment more [Figure 2]. The findings suggest that it may be
efficient and effective. The use of the technology important to integrate interactive instructional video
will ensure that the implementation of e-learning into e-learning systems. Only 53% of them had taken
would be a success. Moreover, the technology tools e-learning courses previously. Of which, 41% of
being used to implement e-learning should be able to the people understood the course that was taught to
deliver the knowledge as required. Technology has them, 39% of them claimed to understand most of
been developing day to day which is highly useful the topic, and 20% did not understand the topic. 75%
in educational aspects for students like introducing of the students find that e-learning courses create a
the iPad system without carrying heavy textbooks or platform to learn faster, as it creates a deep memory,
notebooks.[21] Students having access to an e-learning while 25% of them complain that it was more time
system can now interact with instructional materials consuming and a laborious method. 38% of them
in various formats (text, pictures, sound, video on stated that e-learning had helped improve their
demand, and so on) anywhere and at any time, as long academic performance [Figure 3]. 70% of students
as they can log on to the internet. believe that e-learning courses will be a better choice
for the future generation, at the same time, they feel
Furthermore, given the functionality of message boards, that it may not be affordable for everyone [Figure 4].
instant message exchanges, and video conferencing, 87% of the students think that e-learning helps them
they can even interact with teachers and classmates to prepare well for all the competitive examinations
both individually and on a simultaneous basis. They can and also guides them in choosing their career
also engage in self-paced learning, taking control over [Figure 5].
both the process and the content of their learning.[18-20]
RESULTS
Among the people who participated in the survey,
83% were females and 17% were males. They were
all between the age groups of 18–21. About 86%
of them are aware of e-learning which proves that
e-learning has been growing and has become more
popular in recent times. More than 52% of the
people preferred the conventional teaching methods Figure 3: Do you think your academic performance has
to e-learning [Figure 1]. When asked about the type improved?
developing countries: Case study eBIT, Sri Lanka. Int J Educ computer conference to support literacy. Br J Educ Technol
Dev ICT 2008;4:101-14. 2003;34:57-66.
10. Richardson JC, Newby T. E role of students’ cognitive engagement 18. Massa LJ, Mayer RE. Testing the ATI hypothesis: Should
in online learning. Am J Distance Educ 2006;1:23-37. multimedia instruction accommodate verbalizer-visualizer
11. Azliza Y, Aini K, Zainudin O, Zurairah A. Student awareness cognitive style? Learn Individ Dierences 2006;16:321-35.
towards e-learning in education. Proced Soc Behav Sci 19. Jackson CJ. Using the hybrid model of learning in personality
2012;67:93-101. to predict performance in the workplace. In: Proceedings
12. Trombley BK, Lee D. Web-based learning in Corporations: of 8th IOP Conference, Sydney, Australia; 2009. p. 75-9.
Who is using it and why, who is not and why not? J Educ Media Available from: http://www.allworthjuniper.com.au/8th_IOP_
2002;27:137-46. Conference_Proceedings.pdf#page=76.
13. Underwood J, Szabo A. Academic offences and e-learning: 20. Jones C, Cross S. Is there a Net Generation Coming to
Individual propensities in cheating. Br J Educ Technol University? In: Proceedings of ALT-C 2009 “In Dreams
2003;34:467-77. Begins Responsibility”: Choice, Evidence and Change, 8-10
14. Paul RP, Elisabeth VG. Motivational and self-regulated September 2009, Manchester, UK; 2009.
learning components of classroom academic performance. 21. Thejeswar EP, Thenmozhi MS. Educational research-iPad
J Educ Psychol 1990;82:33-40. system vs textbook system. Res J Pharm Tech 2015;8:1158-60.
15. Balannskat A, Blamire R, Kefala S. A Review of Studies of ICT 22. Okon EA, Ahiauzu B. Towards effective development of
Impact on Schools in Europe. Brussels: European Schoolnet; electronic information resources in Nigerian University
2006. Libraries. Lib Manage 2008;29:504-14.
16. Christensen EW, Anakwe UP, Kessler EH. Receptivity to 23. Rupashri SV. Survey on sleep habits and academic performance
distance learning: The effect of technology, reputation, of dental college students. Int J Life Sci Rev 2015;1:268-78.
constrains, and learning preferences. J Res Computing Educ
2001;33:263-79.
17. Clark L, Heaney P. Author online: Using asynchronous
Source of support: Nil; Conflict of interest: None Declared