Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Farmers Suicide
Farmers Suicide
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide
range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and
facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at
https://about.jstor.org/terms
Economic and Political Weekly is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend
access to Economic and Political Weekly
V SRIDHAR
he summer of 2004 was an unprecedented one for rural there had been no attempt - either by the English language press
Andhra Pradesh, even by the dubious standards estab-or the local media - to collate and analyse the information at
lished in the last two decades when the number of suicides a broader level to highlight the issues at stake.
by peasants had risen alarmingly. In a short span of less than However, the most plausible reason for the spate of suicides
two months, between May and July 2004, more than 400 peasants appears to be related to the fact that farmers were at that time
in the state committed suicide. Although peasant suicides have engaged in the task of planning their next crop. May and June
repeatedly occurred in the state in the past, the significance ofare months when they prepare for sowing the kharif crop in late
this round of deaths lay in the fact that they were reported fromJune and July, when the monsoon arrives in most parts of the
every single district in the state, barring Hyd-rabad. state. Those sympathetic to the plight of the farmers argued that
Blaming "drought", the favourite explanation of do-nothingsmall and marginal farmers across the state had reached the end
politicians, simply failed to explain the tragic phenomenon. Theof the road. Unable to clear their existing loans or to get fresh
fact that suicjdes were reported literally from every corer ofloans for the next season, and seeing no hope on the horizon
the state (Table 1), in particular, from even the better irrigated
they took their lives, they say.
districts, exposed the argument that the scarcity of water, depicted What explains the phenomenon of a sharp increase in thlf
in a vague and generally deceptive sense, was responsible forincidence of suicide among the peasantry? The consensus among
farmers committing suicide. Instead, the stunning sweep of death psychiatrists and social scientists who have explored the phe-
nomenon is that a substantial "dislocation" of livelihoods drives
across the state brought to the fore all that is wrong in the lives
of the peasantry. a community to despair and eventually suicide. Although the
Death hit farmers in varying agro-climatic zones. Unlike the phenomenon of suicide is a deeply personal and individual act,
rounds of suicides in 1987-88, 1997-98 and 2000, when peasants suicidal behaviour is determined by a confluence of factors. These
.growing particular crops such as tobacco, cotton, chillies and are basically in two domains. One, the internal domain, relates
groundnut died, in 2004 death stalked everywhere. No crop wasto factors which operate at the level of the individual. The other
exempted and no section of the small peasantry appeared insu- is external, which suggests that larger social processes determine
lated. The overwhelming proportion of the death toll was amongsuicidal behaviour. It places emphasis on broader society-level
small and marginal farmers and tenant cultivators, who had nochanges, as being responsible for deaths by suicide. The reasoning
claim on the land they cultivated and who paid exorbitant rents is that individuals, unable to cope with the social chur in which
to landlords. they find themselves, resort to suicide. Of course, this is accen-
What explains the unprecedented number of suicides in suchtuated when such a churn is also accompanied by widespread
a short duration? Several theories floated in Hyderabad. The economic distress.
theory popular among sections of bureaucrats, politicians and The evolution of the modern understanding of suicides and
suicidal behaviour has been to marry the externalised and the
the intelligentsia was that the peasants committed suicide because
of the assistance package announced on the eve of elections by internalised views. Diego De Leo, psychiatrist and former presi-
the then chief minister N Chandrababu Naidu, who hitherto dent of the International Association for Suicide Prevention
(IASP), explains that this understanding has come a long way
steadfastly clung to the notion that a relief package for victims
would spur more farmers to their death. On June 2, 2004 the from the early 19th century view that equated suicidal behaviour
previous chief minister remarked that the "unusual spurt" in thewith insanity. Two concomitant revolutions in the late 19th
number of suicides after Rajasekhara Reddy assumed office was century - one in the field of sociology, associated with Emile
because of the package. Durkheim (1951), and the other, the psychoanalytical movement
Another explanation was that it was simply because the media, led by Sigmund Freud, have been synthesised in the modern view
of suicide and suicidal behaviour.
particularly the Telugu language press, was reporting such deaths
in a much more systematic manner than before. Some TeluguThe phenomenon of suicide is therefore widely regarded to
be a result of individuals' inability to cope with sudden and
papers listed the number of suicides in their district editions.
Media observers pointed out that the coverage by the Telugu cataclysmic changes in socio-economic conditions. It is not
media was much better when compared to earlier rounds of such without significance that the highest suicide rates are those
deaths. In fact, observers noted that even the English dailiesprevailing in the countries of the erstwhile Soviet Union, where
published from state reported the deaths in a more systematiccalamitous changes in living conditions have occurred in the last
decade and more.
fashion than in the past. However, media critics also noted that
Crops North Coastal Andhra South Coastal Andhra Rayalaseema South Telangana North Telangana Total State
1958 1998 1958 1998 1958 1998 1958 1998 1958 1998 1958 1998
Foodgrains 66.90 54.40 72.10 65.40 44.40 23.60 64.40 62.50 74.20 60.60 73.10 53.20
Groundnut 7.10 9.50 3.60 1.80 20.30 48.30 10.50 9.50 8.00 5.30 10.50 15.30
Oilseeds 11.30 12.90 6.30 3.70 21.40 56.30 19.50 20.30 15.10 10.80 15.30 20.80
Cotton 0.20 0.70 0.80 7.00 7.90 5.20 0.40 8.20 4.00 17.60 3.10 8.20
Others 21.60 32.00 20.80 23.90 26.30 14.90 15.50 9.00 6.70 11.00 11.60 17.80