‘ons Is deciding when > Gomman problem en’ {C atop considering possPve® ities that the team considers most. Coe i a See gaussian focused ono” tev. > + Conwut previous JHA and accident investio ‘= Talk with experienced tage 3: Develop recommendatl jon reports for ways to eliminate, OF ‘control each hazard ions whenever possible ‘Recommending Corrective Measures mend con the job site » Retormnseone paren vine uence, beginning wath the Sst © Recommendations should be hazard, ‘= Recommendations must be specific 2 As many sobttons as possible should be listed ‘The same four factors used fo dently hazards ca” Pe recommendation for corrective measures: 41. Physical actions povtay be nossibeto ebminate he risks by modiying, rearranging or combining used to develop an effective actions" «tis also good practice to lit personal protective equipment (PPE) that may be used to control the employee's exposure to hazards associated with a particular physical action even when- recommendations for eliminating the hazard have been proposed. 2. Materials ray be posse to set's esha mate. not posse In be econ conrad ways to conta ie employee's exposure tatrtaalby suggesting hese of PPE ore nallaton of protective devi ‘such as splash guards or shields. 3. Equipment + Recommendations for corective measures may includ Reco : othe instal ine guards, automatic safeguard devices or perhaps even the one of a particular piece of equipment. ecu + Recommending the use f PPE should also be considered * Recommendations for correcti : , OF noise reduction systems, the use of PI he ral redesign of the work area, gaan lighting, ation or ee