Correlations

Employ Skills Aca_Perf

**
Employ Pearson Correlation 1 .723 .846**
Sig. (1-tailed) .000 .000
N 20 20 20
**
Skills Pearson Correlation .723 1 .821**
Sig. (1-tailed) .000 .000
N 20 20 20
** **
Aca_Perf Pearson Correlation .846 .821 1
Sig. (1-tailed) .000 .000
N 20 20 20
**. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (1-tailed).

There is a significant, positive and strong association between employability and skills (r=0.723,
p<0.05)

There is a significant, positive and strong association between employability and academic
performance (r=0.846, p<0.05)

Correlations
average years of
lung function cigarettes a day smoking
lung function Pearson Correlation 1 -.825** -.793**
Sig. (1-tailed) .000 .000
N 25 25 25
average cigarettes a day Pearson Correlation -.825** 1 .970**
Sig. (1-tailed) .000 .000
N 25 25 25
** **
years of smoking Pearson Correlation -.793 .970 1
Sig. (1-tailed) .000 .000
N 25 25 25
**. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (1-tailed).

Correlation report example DV and IV (years of smoking)

There is a significant (0.000), negative (-7.93) and strong association between years of smoking and
lung function r is 0.000 below 5% therefore initial is significant, positive and related to dependent
variable.
 Coefficientsa
Standardized
Unstandardized Coefficients Coefficients
Model B Std. Error Beta t Sig.
1 (Constant) 27.535 26.332 1.046 .308
initial wood volume .946 .149 .944 6.365 .000
number of tress .725 .832 .093 .872 .394
average age of trees -.504 .286 -.100 -1.763 .093
average volume of trees 3.000 3.751 .071 .800 .433
a. Dependent Variable: final wood volume
Explain Standardize beta coefficient

As initial volume of tree increases by 1 std dev, final wood volume increases by 0.944 of standard
deviation. Which makes initial wood volume the highest influence and the best performer among all
the IVs.

Gender
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid Male 15 50.0 50.0 50.0
Female 15 50.0 50.0 100.0
Total 30 100.0 100.0

 Total of 30 respondent, 50% male 50% female that makes up the gender population

Residence
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid Urban 14 46.7 46.7 46.7
Rural 16 53.3 53.3 100.0
Total 30 100.0 100.0

 More respondent is living in rural compared to urban area

Descriptive Statistics
N Minimum Maximum Mean Std. Deviation
Age 30 20 27 22.30 1.622
CGPA 30 2.10 4.00 3.3443 .43344
Valid N (listwise) 30

 Age has more variation compared to CGPA according to the std variation
 > 1 more variation <1 less variation = std variation

Cronbach alpha
 Reliability Statistics
Cronbach's
Alpha N of Items
.778 6

0.778 = r square = 77.8% of variance in dv is explain by iv

23.2% of the variance = not explain by the variance

More than 70% good model

ANOVA
SIGNIFANCE

ANOVAa
Model Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig.
1 Regression 15.706 2 7.853 21.668 .000b
Residual 6.161 17 .362
Total 21.867 19
a. Dependent Variable: Employ
b. Predictors: (Constant), Aca_Perf, Skills

F-stats = 21.668 = statistically significance

Coefficient

Coefficientsa
Standardized
Unstandardized Coefficients Coefficients
Model B Std. Error Beta t Sig.
1 (Constant) -2.319 1.275 -1.819 .087
Skills .164 .418 .088 .392 .700
Aca_Perf 1.207 .351 .774 3.435 .003
a. Dependent Variable: Employ

t-sig = significant for skills which has more than 0.05 skill (0.392) not related to the dv

If the sig. p (0.000) <0.05 = positive relationship with dv = Aca_perf positive relationship with dv,
Skills negative relationship with dv

beta = when aca perf increase by 1 std deviation, employability increases by 0.774 of std deviation =
report highest influence = conclusion = aca has strongest perform among the iv.

TEST
Problem statement

Schematic diagram

Hypothesis

1 case

Findings cam spss

Report correltion beta>> contoh kat atas